ML21071A205: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act President of the Senate                        Speaker of the House of Representatives                            GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
: 1. Name of Department or Agency                                          2. Subdivision or Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                        Research
: 3. Rule Title Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.240 "Fresh and Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analyses"
: 4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
: 5.          Major Rule        Non-major Rule
: 6.          Final Rule          Other      Issuance of Regulatory Guide
: 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments?                            Yes    No          N/A
: 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or                        Routine and Frequent or Significant; or                                        Informational/Administrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant                            (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
: 9. Effective Date (if applicable)
: 10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both)                attached      stated in rule Submitted by: _____________________________              (signature)
Eugene Dacus Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
 
==Title:==
For Congressional Use Only:
Date Received: ________________
Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________
3/23/99
 
Yes No N/A A. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
: 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
: 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under           
    § 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 12612, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99}}

Revision as of 23:19, 8 September 2021

Gao for Rg 1.240 Fresh and Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analyses
ML21071A205
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/12/2021
From: Michael Eudy
NRC/RES/DE/RGDB
To:
US General Accounting Office (GAO)
Eudy M
Shared Package
ML20352A361 List:
References
RG-1.240
Download: ML21071A205 (2)


Text