IA-88-464, Expresses Thanks & Appreciation at Comments & Review Re Termination of Proposed Rev to SRP 3.9.3: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IA-88-464, Requests That Generic Issue (GI) 119.1, Pipe Rupture Requirements & Decoupling of Seismic Loads Be Subsumed in Remaining Portion of GI B-6, Loads,Load Combinations & Stress Limits]]
| number = ML20206E604
| issue date = 10/02/1986
| title = Expresses Thanks & Appreciation at Comments & Review Re Termination of Proposed Rev to SRP 3.9.3
| author name = Arlotto G
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
| addressee name = Bernero R, Speis T, Thompson H
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket =
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = FOIA-88-464
| document report number = NUDOCS 8811180136
| package number = ML20205C260
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- _-_ -_          ___  _                                  _    _                            _
    .             %,                           umito sTAtts
[f' D                e o          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, O. C. 20555 t
s,.....
OCT    2 1936 MCMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM:              Guy A. Arlotto. Director Division of Engineering Safety Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
 
==SUBJECT:==
TERMINATION OF PROPOSED REVISION TO SRP 3.9.3 On March 12, 1986      I requested coments on a proposed revision to SPR 3.9.3 dealfag with decoupling of seismic and pipe rupture loads. This revision was recomended by the USNRC Piping Review Comittee.          As a result of efforts and inputs from several NRC offices, a consensus has been developed to terminate ti  nroposed revision to SRP 3.9.3. Pending licensing actions do not require the reposed revision to SRP 3.9.3. An assessment of value/ impacts for a rule to amend GDC-2 is underway to detemine if this course should be adopted.
This could pemit a more comprehensive treatment of the issue. I wish to express my thanks to all those who reviewed the proposed revision and offered comments.
(          /
Cd A. Arletto. Director Division of Engineering Safety Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Distribution:  See attached Forn~tt VV(
n/4 8811180136 881104 PDR  FOIA CHAPMANB8-464      PDR
 
m-      --                   ._
  ,e  .
DISTRIBUTION T. Speis, NRR H. Thompson, NRR R. Bernero, NRR F. Miraglia, NRR E. Jordan, IE S. Ebneter, RI A. Gibson, RI!
C. Paperic*alo, R!!!
E. Johnson, RIV D. Kirsch, RV W. Olmstead OGC W. Shicids, OGC J. Scinto. 0GC R. Bosnak, NRR F. Cherny, NRR H. Wong. IE K. Kniel NRR J. Page, NRR K. Wichman, NRR l
l}}

Latest revision as of 04:42, 12 January 2021