ML20196C034: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-        -
D0CKET NUMBER nn PROPOSED RULE TA      30
                                                ;00 KC iE (53 FA' 1645SJ                g MNkC
                                        '88 JN 20 P3 :57            June 6,  1988 Samuel J. Chilk                        OUICE ar sism iAn-Secretary of the Commission            00CMEi t;r .gEHVMtent ion: Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                          and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.      20555
 
==Dear Sir:==
 
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing See. brook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.      All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
Sincerely, MA                  )
bL m M-            .
            - C-              P                                  1-  .-    .    , ,,
ame and Address:              *                                                      <
Se          hAtrt--                                                                    l Y        t. >    L      W/ ,            ,                                      .
tALd/
f        h lYY 8806300437 080606 PDR  PP 50 53FR16435      PDR            .
5-M i
                                                                                              !}}

Revision as of 08:18, 13 November 2020

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Proposed Rule Developed W/Only Util Interests in Mind
ML20196C034
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/06/1988
From: Cyr S, Cyr W
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00792, 53FR16435-792, NUDOCS 8806300437
Download: ML20196C034 (1)


Text

- -

D0CKET NUMBER nn PROPOSED RULE TA 30

00 KC iE (53 FA' 1645SJ g MNkC

'88 JN 20 P3 :57 June 6, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk OUICE ar sism iAn-Secretary of the Commission 00CMEi t;r .gEHVMtent ion: Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Sir:

On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing See. brook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.

In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.

Sincerely, MA )

bL m M- .

- C- P 1- .- . , ,,

ame and Address: * <

Se hAtrt-- l Y t. > L W/ , , .

tALd/

f h lYY 8806300437 080606 PDR PP 50 53FR16435 PDR .

5-M i

!