ML20136F787: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IA-85-161, Suppls Final Response to FOIA Request.App of Documents Addressed Under FOIAs 85-101 & 84-291 Also Pertain to Request.App Encl]]
| number = ML20136F787
| issue date = 11/08/1985
| title = Suppls Final Response to FOIA Request.App of Documents Addressed Under FOIAs 85-101 & 84-291 Also Pertain to Request.App Encl
| author name = Felton J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
| addressee name = Stephens S
| addressee affiliation = NUCLEAR AWARENESS NETWORK
| docket =
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = FOIA-85-161
| document report number = NUDOCS 8511220188
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 3
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:r I    '
Ya                        UNITED STATES                                  Tb bOTA I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
  *f.            e WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555.
4 4...  . +*
NOV 081985 Ms. Stevi Stephens Nuclear Awareness Network 13471 Massachusetts                                        IN RESPONSE REFER Lawrence, KS' 66044                                        TO F0IA-85-161
 
==Dear M.s. Stephens:==
 
In my final response dated July 16, 1985, to your above referenced Freedom.of Information Act (F0IA) request, I informed you that other documents that are subject to your request were being addressed in our responses to two previous F0IA requests. We have now completed our responses to those two requests, F0IA-84-291 from Elizabeth Brosius of your organization, and F01A-85-101 from Michele Yarricchio and Thomas Devine of the Government Accountability Project.
I have identified these documents on the enclosed appendix, and indicated under which request the documents were addressed and the dates of our responses.
Sinc rely,
                                                    . M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
 
==Enclosure:==
As stated 8511220188 851108 PDR    FOIA STEPHEN 85-161    PDR
 
                  ,    N                                            Re:  F0IA-85-161 F0IA Files.- F01A-84-291 from Brosius F01A-85-101 from Varricchio/Devine APPENDIX
: 1. 11/24/82 Memo from Chilk to Fitzgerald., [ Addressed under y01A-85-101,
                        -letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix 0, document 1.
Portions denied under Exemption 5.]
: 2. 06/29/83 OI Report of Inquiry, Q4-83-014.      [ Addressed under F0IA-84-291, letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix L, document 1.
Portions denied under Exemptions 6, 7C, and 7D.]
: 3. 08/18/83 01 Report of Investigation, 4-83-005.      [ Addressed under F0IA-84-291, letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix I, document 3. Portions denied under Exemption 70.]
l        4. 04/11/84 OI Report of Inquiry, Q4-84-018.      [ Addressed under F0IA-84-291, l                        letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix N, document 7. Denied under Exemption 7A.]
: 5. 12/10/84 I4emo from Hayes to H. H. E. Plaine, [Addressedunder F01A-85-101, letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix P, document 1. Denied under Exemption 5.]
: 6. 12/21/84 Memo from Hayes to Martin. [ Addressed under F0IA-85-101, letter dated-October 15, 1985, Appendix K, document 18 -
Released.]
: 7. 12/21/84 Memo from Ward to Hayes. [ Addressed under F0IA-85-101, letter dated October 15, 1985, Appendix'K, document 19 - Released.]
: 8. 12/24/84 Memo from Hayes to Palladino and Comrs. [ Addressed under F01A-85-101, letter dated November 7,1985, Appendix P document 2. Denied under Exemption 5.]
: 9. 01/16/85 Memo from Palladino to Hayes. [ Addressed under F0IA-85-101, letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix P, document 6.
Denied under Exemption 5.]
: 10. 01/30/85 OI Report of Inquiry, Q4-84-042.        [ Addressed under F0IA-85-101, letter dated October 15, 1985, Appendix G, document 3. Denied l
under Exemptions 6, 7A, 7C, and 70.]
: 11. 01/31/85 . Memo from Herr to Martin. [ Addressed under F01A-85-101, letter dated October 15, 1985, Appendix G, document 7. Denied under Exemption 7A.]
 
                              ^v-                                              Re:  F0IA-85-161
                        . 4g F0IA Files:    F01A-84-291 from Brosius F01A-85-101 from Varricchio/Devine APPENDIX
: 12. 02/05/85 Memo form Herr to Westerman. [ Addressed under F01A-85-101, let.ter dated October 15, 1985, Appendix K, document 22. Denied underExemption7A.]
    ,        13. 02/19/85- Memo from Chilk to Asselstine.          [ Addressed under F01A-85-101, letter dated November 7, 1985, Appendix M, document 16 -
Released.]
: 14. 02/21/85 OI Report of Inquriy, Q4-85-001.            [ Addressed under F0IA-85-101, letter dated October 15, 1985, Appendix K, document 3.          Denied under Exemptions 6, 7A, 7C, and 7D.]
l i
i i
i i
 
v.- 3          n.
                        ; + ..-- . a . ,. . +                              -
      , 3.y b, .
w t
(-                          (b  '
s      .
March 1, 1985 nucear oworeness networc 1347% massachusetts . lawrence, kansas 66044 .(913)749-1640 Director Office of Administration US Nuclear Regulatory Commission                    fREEBOM OF INFORMAT:ON Washington, D.C. 20555                              'W REQUEST FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST                  FRA--M- l(a I To h' nom It May concern:                                  Qd3          ((
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, U.S.C. 522, as amended, the Nuclear Awareness Network requests the following documents regarding the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Plant.
Please consider " documents" to include reports, studies, test results, correspondence, memoranda, meeting notes, meeting minutes, working papers, graphs, charts, diagrams, notes and summaries of conversations and interviews, computer records, and any other forms of written communication, including inter-nal NRC staff memorands. The documents are specifically re-quested from, but not limited to, the following offices of the NRC: Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD); Office of Nuclear Reactor Research (NRR); Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (Research); Office of Inspection and Enforcement (I&E); Office of Investigations (OI); Generic Issues Branch of the Division of Safety Technology, and the Operating Reactors Branches of the Division of Licensing.
In your response, please identify which documents correspond to which requests below.
Pursuant to this request, please provide all documents prepared or utilized by, in the possession of, or routed through the NRC related to the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Plant:
: 1.      Any and all NRC documents relating to the Quality First cases, allegations, investigations.
: 2.      Any and all information on instances of intimidation and/or harassment of any workers at the plant.
: 3.        Any and all documents between the Commission and all other NRC offices particularly about, but not limited to, issues which the Commission is allowing to be in-vestigated and inspected.
: 4.        Any    an all documents generated within or as a result of the    February 28, 1985 Commission briefing relating to the    structural steel welding problem, licensing, and any    other areas, by NRR or any other branches.          j q .pp x  ,
s-
                                                                                  -pyeg
 
l : M i m W m w s & e . ,3 7 ;;. p y-t- w r ~ s p ~
                                                                      -m m, v -n- q3
            %                                                                        .,q y
w
                                                                                      - g%
'l      ' ' Tf any of the material covered by this request has been des-troyed and/or removed, please provide all surrounding docu-mentation, including but not limited to a description of the action (s) taken, relevant date(s), and justification (s) for the actions.
For any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific FOIA-exemption, please. provide an index itemizing and describing the documents or portions of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is rele-vant to the document or portion of the document withheld. This index is required under Vauchn v. Rosen (I), 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973 ) ,-'edet . denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).
                      -    ' ~. U i.
We look forward to your response to this request within ten days.
Sincerely, I            f 2byu-Stevi Stephens}}

Revision as of 07:39, 2 September 2020

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20136F787&oldid=2938827"