|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams
| | #REDIRECT [[RS-12-159, Enclosure 2 to RS-14-034 - Updated Transmittal 2 (Annex B) Seismic Walkdown Report in Report to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 3.4. Part 1]] |
| | number = ML12339A227
| |
| | issue date = 11/16/2012
| |
| | title = 12Q0108.10-R-002, Revision 0, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Braidwood Station, Unit 2. Part 4 of 5
| |
| | author name = Delaney M
| |
| | author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Stevenson & Associates
| |
| | addressee name =
| |
| | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| |
| | docket = 05000456, 05000457
| |
| | license number = NPF-072, NPF-077
| |
| | contact person =
| |
| | case reference number = RS-12-159
| |
| | document report number = 12Q0108.10-R-002, Rev 0
| |
| | document type = Report, Miscellaneous
| |
| | page count = 112
| |
| | project =
| |
| | stage = Other
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| =Text=
| |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21P08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| INSTRUMENT BUS 214 INVERTER - DIV. 22 Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used, to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-3391BK Revision D Anchor spacing is 10" at 2 locations while drawing specifies 12". NSWP-S-05 allows 2 diameter relocation which would equal 10" for 1" diameterexpansion anchors therefore OK.
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-254
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) '
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21P08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| INSTRUMENT BUS 214 INVERTER - DIV. 22 Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Seismic block walls.
| |
| No bulb guards on lights but they would not impact equipment if they fell. S&L Std E-103 -ok
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 1.0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-255
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: M. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21P08E Equipment Class: (16) Bat tery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| INSTRUIMENT BUS 214 INVERTER - DIV. 22 Photos Zlf-UtSt (NV-bbVb) 1-31-12 U23 21P1::: (NI-5-95) 7-31-12 024 C-256
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1 0-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21P08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| INSTRUMENT BUS 214 INVERTER- DIV. 22 21P08E (NP-6695) 7-31-12 025 21POSE 7-31-12 020 C-257
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21P08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters iipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| INSTRUMENT BUS 214 INVERTER - DIV. 22 21P08E 7-31-12 021 C-258
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0606 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2A OUT li/P TRANSDUCER Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoracqe
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Attached to well-anchoredrack 2PL86J C-259
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0606 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2A OUT I/P TRANSDUCER Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,.ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Overheadfire protection piping and HVAC is well-supported
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/2/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-260
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0606 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2A OUT I/P TRANSDUCER Photos Z IY-bSUb5 -Z-1IZ U4Vd C-261
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0607 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX #2B OUT I/P TRANSDUCER Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Well-supported rack C-262
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0607 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX #2B OUT I/P TRANSDUCER Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Seismic block walls
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/2/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-263
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 21Y-0607 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX #2B OUT I/P TRANSDUCER Photos 21Y-606 8-2-12 049 21Y-606 8-2-12 050 C-264
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS001C Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MS ISOL VLV LOOP 2C ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 377.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-265
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M ,N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS001C Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MS ISOL VLV LOOP 2C ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Valve is robust Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-266
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS001C Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MS ISOL VLV LOOP 2C ASMBLY Photos 2MSO301 (AWB - UAMAUEU IULA I ION JOIN I 2Mb001U 8-1-12 AM 001 AND WEATHER STRIP) 8-1-12 AM 008 C-267
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS001C Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves nmant na'qrrinfinn- MS ISOL VLV LOOP 2C ASMBLY 2MS001C 8-1-12 AM 002 2MS001C 8-1-12 AM 003 C-268
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2C PORV Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 404.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-269
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2C PORV Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Valve is robust Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-270
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12QO108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2C PORV 2MS018C 8-1-12 AM 004 2MS018C 8-1-12 AM 005 C-271
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Pirminmcanf 'aarrinfinn. 5qi/ 92. PC)P\/
| |
| C-272
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status:
| |
| * N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018D Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2D PORV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of.equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage.
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-273
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-0P2 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018D Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2D PORV ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Valve is robust Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-274
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018D Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2D PORV ASMBLY Photos ZM,-iU1lSL (AVVb - UNIN I-ALLU 05-1--1 AM U1 Z C-275
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2MS018D Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| S/G 2D PORV ASMBLY
| |
| = L I I ý r I 2MS018D 8-1-12 AM 010 2MS018D 8-1-12 AM 011 C-276
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA03J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)
| |
| Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoracie
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Flooris tiled
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Weld exceeds drawing requirement
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-277
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA03J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)
| |
| Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| No bulb guards but lights wouldn't impact equipment if they fell. S&L Std E-103 -ok
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-278
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA03J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)
| |
| Photos 2PA03J 7-31-12 035 2PA03J 7-31-12 036 C-279
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA09J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (SSPS Cab. Train A)
| |
| Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Flooris tiled
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-339 IC Revision BM Weld exceeds drawing requirements
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-280
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: FT] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PAO9J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (SSPS Cab. Train A)
| |
| Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| No bulb guards but lights wouldn't damage equipment if they fell. S&L Std E-103 -ok
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-281
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA09J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (SSPS Cab. Train A)
| |
| Photos 2PA 09J (AWB -MSAC TEST PANEL) 7-31-12 039 2PA 09J (AWB -MSAC TEST PANEL) 7-31-12 040 C-282
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PAO9J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (SSPS Cab. Train A)
| |
| -MSAC TEST PANEL) 7-31-12 041 2PAO9J 7-31-12 037 C-283
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PAO9J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (SSPS Cab. Train A) 2PA09J 7-31-12 038 C-284
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA27J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (A)
| |
| Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoraqge
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Flooris tiled
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing20E-0-3391C Revision BM Weld exceeds drawing requirements
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-285
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA27J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (A)
| |
| Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| No bulb guards on lights but would not damage equipment if they fell. S&L Std E- 103 -ok
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?.
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-286
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA27J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (A),
| |
| Photos ZI'APZ(J I-L*1-1Z U4Z 2PA27J 7-31-12 043 C-287
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PA27J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (A) 2PA27J 7-31-12 044 C-288
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| SFP PMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoracqe
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| ,5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Rack mounted to wall Nut at 7:00 location is loose. Two otherscrews are tight and are more than adequate to supportsmall weight of pressure indicator. No immediate concern. IR 1394916 was written.
| |
| C-289
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| SFP PMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adverselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/30/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-290
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| SFP PMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos 2PI-0633 7-30-12 PM 001 C-291
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PL07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A DG 1DG01KA CONTROL PANEL Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| -Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Flooris coated
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-292
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PLO7J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A DG lDG01KA CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| OverheadHVAC well-supported
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-293
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PL07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A DG lDG01KA CONTROL PANEL Photos 2PL07J 7-31-12 095 2PL07J 7-31-12 096 C-294
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2B DG 2DG01KB Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchora-ge
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-295
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2B DG 2DG01 KB Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely, to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Small hairline crack in wall is not a structural/seismicissue Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/12 Philip Gazda 10/1/12 C-296
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2B DG 2DG01 KB Photos 2PL08J 7-31-12 104 C-297
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at.the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoraae
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-3391AN Revision U. Additional detailed information from CalculationDetail#8276 Revision B pages 2 to 6 which is input into Structural Calculation 7.16.10.2 (2113/85).
| |
| Due to configuration of the panels and the control room, it is not possible to verify all the welds (front/back, interior/exterior)for the control room panels.
| |
| Welds that are seen are good, matching the drawings and otherinputs without cracks, corrosion, etc. Cabinetsopened for inspection.
| |
| C-298
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| See associatedarea walk-by
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| No structural/seismicissues Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am C-299
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 Photos 2PM05J 7-31-12 045 2PM05J 7-31-12 046 C-300
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 1200108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PMO5J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD 2PM05J 7-31-12 055 C-301
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM06J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-3391AN Revision U. Additional detailed information from Calculation Detail #8276 Revision B pages 7 to 9 which is input into Structural Calculation 7.16.10.2 (2113/85).
| |
| Due to configuration of the panels and the control room, it is not possible to venfy all the welds (front/back, interior/exterior)for the control room panels.
| |
| Welds that are seen are good, matching the drawings and other inputs without cracks, corrosion, etc.
| |
| C-302
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM06J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| see associatedarea walk-by (AWC 13)
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am C-303
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 1200108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM06J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 Photos
| |
| ;10M1 2PM06J 7-31-12 048 2PM06J 7-31-12 049 C-304
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM06J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD I
| |
| 2PM06J 7-31-12 052 2PM06J 7-31-12 053 C-305
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| Drawing 20E-0-3391AJ Revision F.
| |
| Due to configurationof the panels and the control room, it is not possible to verify all the welds (front/back, interior/exterior)for the control room panels.
| |
| Welds that are seen are good, matching the drawings and other inputs without cracks, corrosion,etc. Cabinets were opened to perform verification.
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-306
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| see associatedarea walk-by
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am C-307
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 Photos 2PM07J 7-31-12 050 C-308
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: . 2PM11J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-309
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM11J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| see associatedarea walk-by
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/31/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-310
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PM11J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| MAIN CONTROL BOARD Photos ZFMl ii t-31-1z u1bi C-311
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0514 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2A STEAM PRESS PR Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 377.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? I Well-mounted on rack that is anchoredwith large anchors C-312
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0514 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2A STEAM PRESS PR Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| .11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-313
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.1 O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0514 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2A STEAM PRESS PR Photos 2PT- 0514 (AWB) 8-1-12 AM 017 2PT-0514 8-1-12 AM 015 C-314
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0514 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2A STEAM PRESS PR 2PT-0514 8-1-12 AM 016 C-315
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0546 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2D STEAM PRESS PR Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 377.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applica.ble
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Well mounted on rack Rack is welded to embed plate C-316
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0546 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2D STEAM PRESS PR Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-317
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0546 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| STM GEN LOOP 2D STEAM PRESS PR Photos C-318
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0935 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CNMT PRESS XMTTR Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Instrument mounted on rack that is welded to embed plate C-319
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0935 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CNMT PRESS XMTTR Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/2/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-320
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0935 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CNMT PRESS XMTTR Photos 21- 1-U9.3b (NF--bb~Jb) US-2-1 Z ~ -U!J.S t ZVI F-UO t$-Z-I Z UZI C-321
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2PT-0935 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CNMT PRESS XMTTR ZF 1-0935 U-2-1 2 024 2F1-' 0935 U-2-1 2 025 C-322
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP,2A RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 346.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoracie
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent,, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| DrawingM-1219 Sheet 2 Revision Y Equipment is contaminatedso anchordiameternot measured but visual verification performed
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-323
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP,2A RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/30/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-324
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP,2A RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Photos 2RHO1PA 7-30-12 AM 032 21RHO1PA 7-30-12 AM 033 C-325
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP,2A RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY 2RH01 PA 7-30-12 AM 034 ZKHUI VA (-SU-1 2 AM UJb C-326
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP,2A RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY 2RH01PA 7-30-12 AM 036 C-327
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH PUMP 2A SEAL COOLER Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 346.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| Mounted to skid. Well-anchored.
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-328
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RHO1 PA-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH PUMP 2A SEAL COOLER Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/30/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-329
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH01PA-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH PUMP 2A SEAL COOLER Photos 2RHOI PA-A 7-30-12 AM 030 2RH01 PA-A 7-30-12 AM 031 C-330
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH610 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RHR PUMP 2A MINFLOW VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 357.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-331
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH610 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RHR PUMP 2A MINFLOW VLV ASMBLY, Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Nearby block walls are seismic.
| |
| Nearby scaffolding is laterallysupported with stand-offs on 3 walls. Cannot damage equipment if it were to move in the free direction.
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Valve is a MOV and is robust.
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/30/12 am Valve class changed from fluid operated valve as indicated on SWEL.
| |
| Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-332
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: IN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH610 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RHR PUMP 2A MINFLOWVLV ASMBLY Photos 2RH610 7-30-12 AM 018 2RH610 7-30-12 AM 019 C-333
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH610 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RHR PUMP 2A MINFLOW VLV ASMBLY 2RH610 8-2-12 002 C-334
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH8716B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2B DISCH CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchora-ae
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-335
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH8716B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2B DISCH CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Weil-supported valve Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 7/30/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-336
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.1 0-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH8716B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2B DISCH CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Photos 2RH8716B 7-30-12 AM 043 2RH8716B 7-30-12 AM 044 C-337
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2RH8716B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| RH HX 2B DISCH CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY C-338
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEG INJ ISOL ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 375.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-339
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEG INJ ISOL ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Gallery above is well-supported
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/2/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/11/2012 62 "Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-340
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEG INJ ISOL ASMBLY ZZ5i6dOIA d5-Z-1Z U15 Z,,.?I$UIA d-Z-1Z U15O C-341
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEG INJ ISOL ASMBLY ZZAMUIA O-Z-1Z UI I C-342
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEGS INST ISOL VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 375.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-343
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEGS INST ISOL VLV ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| Overheadgallety is well-supported
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes
| |
| . potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/2/12 am Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 (7 ' "-Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-344
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SI8801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CHG PUMP TO COLD LEGS INST ISOL VLV ASMBLY Photos 2SI8801B 8-2-12 019 C-345
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CC HX 2 INLT VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-346
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CC HX 2 INLT VLV ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Robust valve on well-supported pipe Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-347
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CC HX 2 INLT VLV ASMBLY Photos 26)WU413-1-1Z FM U15 2ZZXUU46~-1-12 HMU1Th C-348
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| CC HX 2 INLT VLV ASMBLY 2SX004 8-1-12 PM 017 C-349
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| U-0 CC HX INLET VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-350
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| U-0 CC HX INLET VLVASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Robust, well-supported valve Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-351
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| U-0 CC HX INLET VLV ASMBLY Photos 2SX005 8-1-12 PM 021 2SX005 8-1-12 PM 022 C-352
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01AA Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A SX PUMP LUBE OIL COOLER Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Equipment is an in-line mounted coolerwith no anchorage details.
| |
| C-353
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01AA Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A SX PUMP LUBE OIL COOLER Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Well-supported IR written on component (tagged) but no impact to seismic safety functions Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-354
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01AA Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| 2A SX PUMP LUBE OIL COOLER Photos C-355
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01PA Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A ESSENTIAL SER WTR ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchora-ge
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Well-anchored C-356
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01PA Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A ESSENTIAL SER WTR ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-357
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01PA Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A ESSENTIAL SER WTR ASMBLY Photos 2bXU1 PA 8-1-12 PM 011 2SX01PA8-1-12 PM 010 C-358
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01PA-C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A SX AUX LUBE OIL PP Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchoraqe
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| Equipment is mounted to oil reservoir. Well-anchored.
| |
| C-359
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX01PA-C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A SX AUX LUBE OIL PP Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012
| |
| .° Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-360
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SXO1PA-C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| PUMP, 2A SX AUX LUBE OIL PP Photos 2SX01 PA-C 8-1-12 PM 006 C-361
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.1O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX033 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ESSENTIAL SERVICE WTR PMP 2A CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
| |
| Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
| |
| Anchorage
| |
| : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
| |
| : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
| |
| : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
| |
| : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
| |
| : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
| |
| : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
| |
| C-362
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX033 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ESSENTIAL SERVICE WTR PMP 2A CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Interaction Effects
| |
| : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
| |
| : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
| |
| : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
| |
| : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
| |
| Other Adverse Conditions
| |
| : 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
| |
| Robust, well-supported valve Comments Seismic walkdown team M. Delaney & P. Gazda 8/1/12 pm
| |
| /~4~LA( 4d4_
| |
| Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-363
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q01 08.1 O-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX033 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| ESSENTIAL SERVICE WTR PMP 2A CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY Photos 2SX033 (NP-6695) 8-1-12 PM 020 2SX033 8-1-12 PM 018 C-364
| |
| | |
| Braidwood Station Unit 2 12Q0108.10-R-002 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
| |
| Equipment ID No.: 2SX033 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment Descriotion: ESSENTIAL SERVICE WTR PMP 2A CROSSTIE VLV ASMBLY 2SX033 8-1-12 PM 019 C-365}}
| |