ML102730400: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
Line 49: Line 49:
B. R. Morrison                                  ~~AflIO)~                                                    Dat~/
B. R. Morrison                                  ~~AflIO)~                                                    Dat~/
{O 1$ oY I
{O 1$ oY I
                                                                                                                            '-
(1)  This is the revision of CM-AA-CLC-301 and  CM-AA-~LC-301-1001 i/ettect at the time the calculation was i~itiate~,
(1)  This is the revision of CM-AA-CLC-301 and  CM-AA-~LC-301-1001 i/ettect at the time the calculation was i~itiate~,


Line 290: Line 289:
: c. {0 >54          fZe.. V. 0            Att "- c ~ M  t<.. \1\ t 1 p~~ I o-f' )
: c. {0 >54          fZe.. V. 0            Att "- c ~ M  t<.. \1\ t 1 p~~ I o-f' )
     'rhe nominal inlet I,D. of subject tubes is 27.9S1~; the nominal throat dia. is 16.000~; thus the ~omina: Beta ratio is 0,5724.
     'rhe nominal inlet I,D. of subject tubes is 27.9S1~; the nominal throat dia. is 16.000~; thus the ~omina: Beta ratio is 0,5724.
I 3.3.1  V.alue of ITCH and Its Basic Toleranc.e
I 3.3.1  V.alue of ITCH and Its Basic Toleranc.e 3.3.2 The value of lie" is 0.987'3 on which the Effect of Installation on "C'f basi~
  --.
  .
3.3.2 The value of lie" is 0.987'3 on which the Effect of Installation on "C'f basi~
                                                                                -
toleranc'e is+/-O. 75%
toleranc'e is+/-O. 75%
* Since subject tubes are direct coupled to a sudden increaser and long radius elbow that precedes them~ an additional +/-O.7% tolerance must be considered on their "C'S",
* Since subject tubes are direct coupled to a sudden increaser and long radius elbow that precedes them~ an additional +/-O.7% tolerance must be considered on their "C'S",

Revision as of 18:09, 11 March 2020

Calculation C10854, Revision 0 Hi & HI-HI Steam Flow and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF Actuation Csa.
ML102730400
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee 
Issue date: 10/14/2009
From: Desrochers J
Dominion Energy Kewaunee
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
C10854, Rev 0
Download: ML102730400 (27)


Text

KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DESIGN BASIS DATABASE LOAD FORM DOCUMENT INFORMATION 6.2.1.1 Document Type Calculation / Evaluation 6.2.1.2 Document ID C10854 6.2.1.3 Document Title Hi & Hi-Hi Steam Flow and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF Actuation CSA 6.2.1.4 KPS Revision 0 6.2.1.5 Addendum N/A 6.2.1.6 Document Date 10/14/2009 6.2.1.7 Topic Development of the Hi & Hi-Hi Steam Flow and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) to support Kewaunee's conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS).

6.2.1.8 Document Status Current 6.2.1.9 Superceded By N/A 6.2.1.10 Attachments Y 6.2.1.11 Safety Related Y AUTHOR INFORMATION 6.2.2.1 Author/Submitter JD Desrochers 6.2.2.2 Vendor N/A 6.2.2.3 Vendor Author N/A 6.2.2.4 Discipline Instrument and Control DOCUMENT RELATIONSHIPS 6.2.3.1 System(s) 006- 975 6.2.3.2 DCR(s) N/A 6.2.3.3 Keyword(s) CALC INDEX 6.2.3.4 Inputs 6.2.3.5 Outputs ADMIN/RECORDS USE ONLY 6.2.4.1 Comments 6.2.4.2 Record Type 6.2.4.3 Retention Period 6.2.4.4 Software Application 6.2.4.5 Vault Location 6.2.4.6 Film Reel 6.2.4.7 Reel Odometer Form GNP-05.27.07-1 Rev. 9 Date: MAR 20 2008 Page 11 of 11 INFORMATION USE

~ Calculation Cover Sheet i'

, Dominion'" Page 1 of 23 Station: Kewaunee - KPS Unit(s): 1 System Code(s):

6 - Main Steam Calculation Number: C10854 Revision: 0 Addendum: N/A Calculation Quality Class: ~ Safety Related D Non-Safety Related IStatus: Current Installation Verification Required: ~Yes DNo Discipline: I&C Keyword(s): Steam Flow, Steam Pressure, ESF, Safety Injection Supersedes: C10854-2 Rev.2, C10854-3 Rev.1, C10854-5 Rev.O Subject (Calculation Title): Hi & Hi-Hi Steam Flow and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF Actuation CSA Initiating Document: Kewaunee Improved Technical Specifications (ITS)

CM-AA-CLC-301, Revision: 1(1) I CM-AA-CLC-301-1001, Revision: 1(1)

AffeCtedi$vstefrl(S},st~ucture(s),/cornponeht s)*.* * *******.* * *(CQhtihuedohPaQe2):* < . ........... . . . . ..)ii .....<

Station: Unit: System: Equipment Location (Mark Number): Tag Number (If Applicable):

KPS 1 6 23001 FT-464 KPS 1 6 4849401 FQ-464 KPS 1 6 4849404 FC-464A/B Objective: The objective of this calculation is to determine the Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) for the Steam Line Isolation and Safety Injection inputs from the Steam Flow and Steam Line Pressure parameters into the logic for the Engineered Safety Features (ESF) actuation system. This calculation supports the conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS).

==

Conclusion:==

The result of the CSA calculation for the Hi Steam Flow bistables is:

CSA Hi Steam Flow = +/- 18.04% Flow Span = +/- 0.806 x 10 PPH 6

The result of the CSA calculation for the Hi-Hi Steam Flow bistables is:

CSAHi -Hi Steam Flow = +/- 2.051 % Flow Span = +/- 0.092 x 10 PPH 6

The result of the CSA calculation for the Low Steam Line Pressure bistables is:

CSA Low Steam Line Pressure = +/- 2.219% of span = +/- 31.066 psig Originator (Print):

J.D. Desrochers Signature: iP &. ...Lt .I."'-L j JA A.._

Date:

J,)/ttl /b~

Signatt?l7tdl11l5!it ~

Reviewer (Print): Date:

D.M. McGrath 10- Jt!-()q Owners Review (Print):

Victor Mvers

~1~,~re: D~/1ctlet 1 A v Md-t:vs :b.e,/

1U<'+(,61:!./-

_. '.~ n fc'Jl/ Date:

10-1'1 -Or tI v, .

Approval (Print):

B. R. Morrison ~~AflIO)~ Dat~/

{O 1$ oY I

(1) This is the revision of CM-AA-CLC-301 and CM-AA-~LC-301-1001 i/ettect at the time the calculation was i~itiate~,

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 2 of 23 C10854 0 N/A Affected System(s), Structure(s), Component(s) (Continued from Page 1.):

Station: Unit: System: Equipment Location (Mark Number): Tag Number (If Applicable):

KPS 1 6 23005 FT-465 KPS 1 6 4849201 FQ-465 KPS 1 6 4849206 FC-465A/B KPS 1 6 23002 FT-474 KPS 1 6 4849801 FQ-474 KPS 1 6 4849804 FC-474A/B KPS 1 6 23007 FT-475 KPS 1 6 4896601 FQ-475 KPS 1 6 4896604 FC-475A/B KPS 1 6 21094 PT-468 KPS 1 6 4849101 PQ-468 KPS 1 6 4849102 PM-468A KPS 1 6 4849103 PC-468A/B KPS 1 6 21095 PT-469 KPS 1 6 4849001 PQ-469 KPS 1 6 4849002 PM-469A KPS 1 6 4849004 PC-469A/B KPS 1 6 21097 PT-478 KPS 1 6 4849901 PQ-478 KPS 1 6 4849902 PM-478A KPS 1 6 4849903 PC-478A/B KPS 1 6 21098 PT-479 KPS 1 6 4849701 PQ-479 KPS 1 6 4849702 PM-479A KPS 1 6 4849703 PC-479A/B KPS 1 6 21096 PT-482 KPS 1 6 4848801 PQ-482 KPS 1 6 4848803 PM-482A KPS 1 6 4848802 PC-482A/B KPS 1 6 21099 PT-483 KPS 1 6 4872101 PQ-483 KPS 1 6 4872103 PM-483A KPS 1 6 4872102 PC-483A/B

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 3 of 23 C10854 0 N/A TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE Calculation Cover Sheet 1 Table of Contents 3 Attachments 3 Record of Revision 3 1.0 Purpose 3 2.0 Method of Analysis 4 3.0 Design Inputs 4 4.0 Assumptions 4 5.0 References 6 6.0 Computer Codes 7 7.0 Functional Block Diagram 8 8.0 Calculations 9 9.0 Conclusion 23 ATTACHMENTS Section 3.3 of Letter to Donald E. Weinberg from Dr. D. Halmi, Senior Principal Engineer, Flow Metering and Calcs, BIF Industries, dated 3/23/77. 50.59 Applicability Review 50.59 Pre-Screening RECORD OF REVISION Rev. 0 Original Issue. This calculation replaces Calculations C10854-2 Rev.2, C10854-3 Rev.1, and C10854-5 Rev.0. This calculation is written as a Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) Calculation versus a Setpoint Calculation.

1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this calculation is to determine the Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) values for the Steam Flow and Steam Line Pressure inputs into the Engineered Safety Features (ESF) logic channels. The applicable Steam Flow channels F-464, F-465, F-474, and F-475 provide input into the Steam Line Isolation function. The applicable Steam Line Pressure channels P-468, P-469, P-478, P-479, P-482, and P-483 provide input into the Safety Injection function.

Because of the difference in parameters measured, separate CSA's will be determined for the Steam Line Isolation and Safety Injection functions.

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 4 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 2.0 METHOD OF ANALYSIS This calculation uses the methodology presented in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6, Calculating Instrumentation Uncertainties by the Square Root of the Sum of the Squares Method (Reference 5.1). The CSA determined in this calculation is a derivation of the following generic equation presented in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6, Section 6.1:

CSA = SE +/- [EA² + PMA² + PEA² + (SCA + SMTE)² + SD² + SPE² + STE² + SPSE2 +

(M1 + M1MTE)² + (M2 + M2MTE)² + ...+ (Mn + MnMTE)² + RD² + RTE² + RRA²]

(Equation 1)

The error terms in Equation 1 are consistent with standard industry definitions and are described in Section 8.0 and in detail in Reference 5.1.

The CSA calculations are based on static conditions. Tolerances associated with the time constants for any dynamic modules are not taken into account in the development of the CSA.

The error terms for the Steam Flow channels will be calculated using units in % P Span. The resulting CSAs will be converted to process units (lbm/hr).

The conversion from % P Span to % of Flow Span is found in Reference 5.24 and is given as:

% Flow Span = % P Span

  • 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 2)

(where X is the flow rate of interest)

Transposing Equation 2 yields the following:

% P Span = % Flow Span / 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 3) 3.0 DESIGN INPUTS The design inputs are manufacturer's published data sheets, active (current) calculations, station controlled drawings and other controlled documents as listed in Section 5.0, References.

4.0 ASSUMPTIONS 4.1 Based on Reference 5.12, all test data is referenced to the rack 10 Test Point Resistor (TPR), therefore the errors associated with the installed DB Box resistors used to convert the loop current to an applied input voltage to the Foxboro or NUS module under test is included in the overall error of the Foxboro or NUS module as referenced to the rack TPR.

4.2 According to References 5.10, 5.11, and 5.12, a Fluke 45 Digital Multimeter (DMM) is used to perform the transmitter and rack module calibration. According to Reference 5.13, the DC Voltage accuracies for the ranges of interest are as follows:

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 5 of 23 C10854 0 N/A Range Desired Acceptance Range 300 mV 300 mV 299.92 to 300.08 mV 3V 3V 2.9992 to 3.0008 V 30 V 30 V 29.992 to 30.008 V Range Desired Acceptance Range 1000 mV 900 mV 899.76 to 900.24 10 V 9V 8.9976 to 9.0024 At Kewaunee, there are six possible voltage spans that could be present in the Reactor Protection System; i.e., 40 to 200 mVDC, 100 to 500 mVDC, 1 to 5 VDC, 0.4 to 12.4 VDC, 2 to 10 VDC, and 0 to 10 VDC. The DC voltage accuracies converted to % of span are given below.

100 to 500 mVDC (1000 mV range) accuracy = (0.24 mVDC / 400 mVDC)

  • 100% = 0.06% of span 0.4 to 12.4 VDC (30 V range) accuracy = (0.008 VDC / 12 VDC)
  • 100% = 0.07% of span 2 to 10 VDC (30 V range) accuracy = (0.008 VDC / 8 VDC)
  • 100% = 0.10% of span 0 to 10 VDC (30 V range) accuracy = (0.008 VDC / 10 VDC)
  • 100% = 0.08% of span 40 to 200 mVDC (300 mVDC range) accuracy = (0.08 mVDC / 160 mVDC)
  • 100% = 0.05% of span 1 to 5 VDC (10 V range) accuracy = (0.0024 VDC / 4 VDC)
  • 100% = 0.06% of span This calculation will be bounded using an accuracy of +/- 0.1% of span for the Fluke 45 DMM for all possible conditions for ranges 30 VDC or less. It is acceptable for the calibration procedures to use a DMM with accuracy specifications equal to or better than the Fluke 45 DMM.

4.3 Reference 5.11 specifies that a deadweight tester is used in the calibration of the Steam Pressure transmitters. Reference 5.10 specifies a pressure measuring device with an accuracy of 2.172 H2O is used in the calibration of the Steam Flow transmitters. A pressure measuring device with equivalent or better accuracy may be substituted.

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 6 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 4.4 This calculation is applicable for normal (non-harsh) conditions only. Therefore, the Environmental Allowance (EA) term is assumed to be zero. This term includes the effects due to degradation of cable insulation (IR) and the effects of high steam pressures and temperatures (SPTE) and radiation (RE) during an accident .

5.0 REFERENCES

5.1 Dominion Standard, STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6, Calculating Instrumentation Uncertainties by the Square Root of the Sum of the Squares Method.

5.2 Kewaunee Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR), Chapters 1, 7 and 14.

5.3 Kewaunee Technical Specifications, Sections 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, and Tables TS 3.5-1, TS 3.5-3 and TS 3.5-4.

5.4 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-FOXBO-0031 (100-1762-1) (PT-001), Revision 15, Nuclear Energy Systems - Instrumentation Reference Manual.

5.5 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-FOXBO-0015 (100-1744-1),

Revision 10, Instrumentation Documentation.

5.6 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-NUSIN-0017 (240730), Revision 2, NUS Instruments Series SPS500 Power Supply.

5.7 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-NUSIN-0022 (C-N-430-9), Revision 4, SAM504-3 Single & DAM504-3 Dual Alarm Module IOM.

5.8 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-ROSEM-0004 (2566-1), Revision 18, Model 1153 Series D Alphaline Nuclear Pressure Transmitter.

5.9 Kewaunee Vendor Technical Manual KW-VTM-000-AMETE-0008 (XK-100-1554, XK-341-1), Revision 0, Comparator and Deadweight Pressure Determination System-Mansfield & Green Type T.

5.10 Kewaunee Instrument Surveillance Procedure MA-KW-ISP-MS-034A, Revision 0, Steam Generator Steam Flow Transmitters Calibration.

5.11 Kewaunee Surveillance Procedure SP-06-031A-1, Revision 3, Steam Generator Steam Pressure Loop 468 Transmitter Channel 1 (Red) Calibration.

5.12 Kewaunee Surveillance Procedure SP-06-034B-1, Revision 13, Steam Generator Flow Mismatch and Steam Pressure Instrument Channel 1 (Red) calibration.

5.13 Kewaunee Instrument and Control Procedure ICP-82B-129, Revision 10, ICE - Fluke 45 Dual Display Multimeters Calibration.

5.14 Kewaunee Instrument and Control Procedure ICP-82B-168, Revision 3, ICE - Heise PTE-1 Calibrator and HQS-2 Pressure Module Calibration.

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 7 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 5.15 Kewaunee Instrument and Control Procedure ICP-82B-06, Revision T, ICE - Pressure Gauge Calibration.

5.16 Kewaunee Instrument and Control Procedure ICP-82B-137, Revision 6, ICE - Precision Test Resistor Calibration.

5.17 Calculation C10746, Revision 0, Addendum A, Instrument Loop Calibration Resistor Check - Resistor Check Test Equipment Extension and Clarification.

5.18 Interconnection Wiring Diagrams:

5.18.1 XK-100-621, Revision 3N, Rack 1R2 5.18.2 XK-100-627, Revision 2P, Rack W2 5.18.3 XK-100-633, Revision 2P, Rack 1B2 5.18.4 XK-100-638, Revision 2P, Rack Y2 5.18.5 XK-100-623, Revision 2N, Rack R-2 5.18.6 XK-100-635, Revision 2L, Rack B2 5.18.7 XK-100-618, Revision 1, Interconnection Wiring Diagram Notes and Legends 5.19 Instrument Block Diagrams:

5.19.1 XK-100-545, Revision B, Instrument Block Diagram Cover Sheet & Index 5.19.2 XK-100-556, Revision 1U, Comp. Steam Flow / FW (Loop A) 5.19.3 XK-100-557, Revision 2T, Comp. Steam Flow / FW (Loop B) 5.20 Kewaunee Environmental Qualification Plan, Revision 27.

5.21 Kewaunee Drawing M-769, Revision AN, Instrument Locations in Reactor & Auxiliary Building.

5.22 Kewaunee Drawing E-828, Revision AV, W/D - Red, White, Blue and Yellow Protection Channel Instruments 5.23 CN-SSO-00-19, Revision 2, Kewaunee Revised Thermal Design Procedure (RTDP)

Uncertainties for Reload Transition Safety Report (RTSR) and Power Uprate to 1757 MWt-NSSS Power.

5.24 Virginia Power Technical Report EE-0039, Revision 0, Flow Channel Uncertainties, Dated 3/21/90.

5.25 Calculation C10854-1, Revision 0, SF/FF Mismatch, FW<SF Reactor Trip 6.0 COMPUTER CODES No computer codes were used to perform this calculation. All calculations were performed by hand using the method described in Section 2.0.

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 8 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 7.0 FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM Steam Flow Steam Pressure FT-464 PT-468 Rosemount Rosemount Transmitter Transmitter Model 1153DD6 Model 1153GD9 0-1438.3 "H2O 0-1400 psig FQ-464 PQ-468 Foxboro Foxboro or NUS or NUS Power Supply Power Supply M1 M1 FC-464A/B PM-468A Foxboro Foxboro or NUS or NUS Bistable Lead/Lag M2 M2 High / High-High PC-468A/B Foxboro Steam Line Isolation or NUS Bistable M3 Safeguard Actuation Note 1: Instrument Loops F-465, F-474 and F-475 are similar to the F-464 loop depicted above.

Note 2: Instrument Loops P-469, P-478, P-479, P-482 and P-483 are similar to the P-468 loop depicted above.

Note 3: See Table 7-1 below for additional Tag / Mark Number information.

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 9 of 23 C10854 0 N/A Table 7-1 Tag/Mark Number Tag/Mark Number Tag/Mark Number Tag/Mark Number ESF Logic Input FT-464 (23001) FQ-464 (4849401) FC-464A/B (4849404) Hi Steam Line Isolation/

Hi-Hi Steam Line Isolation FT-465 (23005) FQ-465 (4849201) FC-465A/B (4849206) Hi Steam Line Isolation/

Hi-Hi Steam Line Isolation FT-474 (23002) FQ-474 (4849801) FC-474A/B (4849804) Hi Steam Line Isolation/

Hi-Hi Steam Line Isolation FT-475 (23007) FQ-475 (4896601) FC-475A/B (4896604) Hi Steam Line Isolation/

Hi-Hi Steam Line Isolation PT-468 (21094) PQ-468 (4849101) PM-468A (4849102) PC-468A/B (4849103) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation PT-469 (21095) PQ-469 (4849001) PM-469A (4849002) PC-469A/B (4849004) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation PT-478 (21097) PQ-478 (4849901) PM-478A (4849902) PC-478A/B (4849903) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation PT-479 (21098) PQ-479 (4849701) PM-479A (4849702) PC-479A/B (4849703) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation PT-482 (21096) PQ-482 (4848801) PM-482A (4848803) PC-482A/B (4848802) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation PT-483 (21099) PQ-483 (4872101) PM-483A (4872103) PC-483A/B (4872102) Lo-Lo Safeguard Actuation 8.0 CALCULATIONS 8.1 Steam Flow Channels F-464, F-465, F-474, and F-475 The High-High Steam Flow or the High Steam Flow coincident with Low-Low TAVG provide input to the Steam Line Isolation logic for Safeguard Actuation.

8.1.1 SE = Systematic Error No Systematic Error has been identified for these loops.

SE = 0.000% P Span 8.1.2 EA = Environmental Allowance No Environmental Allowance will be used in this calculation. (Assumption 4.4)

EA = 0.000% P Span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 10 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.3 PMA = Process Measurement Accuracy At lower flow rates Steam Enthalpy due to pressure and moisture changes will impact the accuracy of the process measurement. Because of this a PMA term of +/- 0.3% of flow span will be applied to the High (but not the High-High) Steam Flow bistables. (Reference 5.23)

The PMA value given in terms of flow is converted to % P span as follows:

% P Span = PMA (% Flow) / 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 3)

PMA = +/- 0.3% flow span Flow Max = 4.47 x 106 lbm/hr (Reference 5.12)

FlowHi Steam = 0.494 x 106 lbm/hr (Reference 5.12)

PMA in % P Span = 0.3% / 0.5 * (4.47 x 106 lbm/hr / 0.494 x 106 lbm/hr) = 0.066% P Span PMAHi Steam = +/- 0.300% Flow Span = 0.066% P Span 8.1.4 PEA = Primary Element Accuracy Three tolerances for the BIF Steam Tubes were identified in Section 3.3.4 of Attachment 1:

1) The Condition of Tube was given a tolerance of 0.2%. For conservatism that tolerance will be increased to 0.5%.
2) The Basic Tolerance is given as 0.75%.
3) The Installation Effect is given as 0.7%.

For conservatism, these tolerances will be added numerically resulting in a tolerance of 1.95%.

The PEA value given in terms of flow is converted to % P span with respect to Flow Nom as follows:

% P Span = PEA (% Flow) / 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 3)

PEA = +/- 1.95% of flow span Flow Max = 4.47 x 106 lbm/hr (Reference 5.12)

Flow Nom = 3.82 x 106 lbm/hr (Reference 5.23)

PEA in % P Span = 1.95% / 0.5 * (4.47 x 106 lbm/hr / 3.82 x 106 lbm/hr) = 3.333% P Span PEA = +/- 1.950% Flow Span = 3.333% P Span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 11 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.5 SCA = Sensor Calibration Accuracy Reference 5.10 provides a transmitter calibration accuracy of +/- 0.25% P span.

SCA = +/- 0.250% P Span (Reference 5.10) 8.1.6 SMTE = Sensor Measuring and Test Equipment The following Measuring and Test Equipment or its equivalent is used for calibration of the transmitters:

1) SMTE1 = DMM, Fluke Model 45 or equivalent with an accuracy of +/- 0.1% of P span SMTE1 = +/- 0.100% of P span (Assumption 4.2)
2) SMTE2 = 10 Test Point Resistor (TPR) with an accuracy of +/- 0.01% P span SMTE2 = +/- 0.010% P span (Reference 5.16)
3) Reference 5.10 states that a pressure measuring device with an accuracy of 2.172 H2O or better is used for the calibration of the Steam Flow transmitters.

SMTE3 = (2.172 H2O / 1438.3 H2O)

  • 100% = +/- 0.151% P span (Reference 5.10)

Therefore the Sensor Measuring and Test Equipment (SMTE) accuracy is equal to:

SMTE = [ (SMTE1 + SMTE2)2 + SMTE32 ] 1/2 SMTE = [ (0.100 + 0.010)2 + (0.151)2 ] 1/2 SMTE = +/- 0.187% P Span 8.1.7 SD = Sensor Drift According to References 5.8 and 5.25 the sensors are Rosemount 1153DD6 transmitters.

Based on Reference 5.8, the Rosemount Model 1153DD6 transmitter has a drift value of +/- 0.2%

of upper range limit (URL) for 30 months. The calibrated span of the instrument per Reference 5.10 is 1438.3 H2O. The upper range limit of the transmitter is 100 psi (2773.0 H2O) per Reference 5.8. Therefore the Sensor Drift allowance for a period of up to 30 months is:

SD = (+/- 0.002

  • 2773 H2O / 1438.3 H2O)
  • 100%

SD = +/- 0.386% P span (References 5.8, 5.10 and 5.25)

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 12 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.8 SPE = Sensor Pressure Effect Reference 5.8 specifies a Static Pressure Zero Effect and a Static Pressure Span Effect.

The Static Pressure Zero Effect is adjusted out by calibration procedures. (Reference 5.10)

The Static Pressure Span Effect equals +/- 0.5% of input reading per 1000 PSIG. (Reference 5.8)

For conservatism, this calculation will assume the maximum pressure of 1005 PSIG from Reference 5.2 when determining the Static Pressure Span Effect.

Therefore, the Static Pressure Span Effect = 100% * (1005 PSIG

  • 0.005) / 1000 PSI SPE = +/- 0.503% P Span 8.1.9 STE = Sensor Temperature Effect The Rosemount Instruction Manual states the temperature effect for Range Code 6 is:

+/- (0.75% of URL + 0.5% span) per 100°F (Reference 5.8)

Upper Range Limit = 2773 H2O (100 PSI) (Reference 5.8)

Transmitter Span = 1438.3 H2O (Reference 5.10)

Temperature Span = 80°F (References 5.3 & 5.20)

STE = +/- [(0.75%

  • 2773 H2O / 1438.3 H2O) + 0.5%] * (80°F / 100°F)

STE = +/- 1.557% P Span 8.1.10 SPSE = Sensor Power Supply Effect The Sensor Power Supply Effect for the Steam Flow transmitters is less than 0.005% of output span per volt. The transmitter is qualified to operate in a region ranging from a minimum of 13.5 VDC up to a maximum of 45 VDC depending upon the load resistance. (Reference 5.8)

The power supply output voltage is not checked during the performance of the transmitter calibration or the channel calibration procedures, therefore to bound all possible conditions, a power supply output tolerance of + 31.5 VDC (i.e. 45 VDC - 13.5 VDC) will be used to determine the Sensor Power Supply Effect. (References 5.10 & 5.12)

SPSE = +/- [0.00005 * (31.5 VDC / 1.0 VDC)]

  • 100% = 0.158%

SPSE = + 0.158% P Span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 13 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.11 M1 = Loop Power Supply This calculation assumes that either a Foxboro or NUS Loop Power Supply is installed. The Loop Power Supply for the process racks is used to power the transmitter current loop and is not used as a signal converter. Therefore, the calibration accuracy is equal to 0.0 % of span.

(References 5.10 & 5.12)

M1 = 0.000% P Span 8.1.12 M1MTE = Loop Power Supply Measuring and Test Equipment The Loop Power Supply for the process racks is used to power the transmitter current loop.

The Loop Power Supply is not used as a signal converter and thus no calibration is required.

Therefore, M1MTE is equal to 0.0% of span. (References 5.10 & 5.12)

M1MTE = 0.000% P Span 8.1.13 M2 = Bistable Based on Reference 5.19, either a Foxboro Model M/63U-BC or NUS Instruments Model DAM504-3 may be installed as a Steam Flow bistable. The calibrated accuracy is +/- 0.500% of span. (Reference 5.12)

M2 = +/- 0.500% P Span 8.1.14 M2MTE = Bistable Module Measuring and Test Equipment One DMM and Test Point Resistor (TPR) are used to calibrate the bistables. (Reference 5.12)

M2MTE = +/- (Fluke + TPR)

Fluke Accuracy = +/- 0.100% of span (Assumption 4.2)

Installed Rack Test Point Resistor Accuracy = +/- 0.100% of span (Reference 5.17)

M2MTE = +/- (0.100 + 0.100) = +/- 0.200% of span M2MTE = +/- 0.200% P Span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 14 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.15 RD = Rack Drift The superseded calculations specified a drift value derived from previous testing. However, that data is not current and Kewaunee is replacing Foxboro rack modules with NUS Instruments equivalents where sufficient drift trends have not been established. Therefore, the standard and conservative value of +/- 1.0% of span as referenced in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6 will be used in this calculation.

RD = +/- 1.000% P Span (Reference 5.1) 8.1.16 RTE = Rack Temperature Effect For Kewaunee calculations the Rack Temperature Effect term was either assumed to be embedded in the Rack Drift term or set to zero percent of span. However, the effects of rack temperature changes have not been monitored or documented . Therefore, the standard and conservative value of +/- 0.5% of span as referenced in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6 will be used in this calculation.

RTE = +/- 0.500% P Span (Reference 5.1) 8.1.17 RRA = Rack Readability Allowance Rack Readability Allowance (RRA) is applicable for the indication portion of the loops. This calculation is only applicable to bistables and does not address indicators.

RRA = +/- 0.0% P Span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 15 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.18 Hi Steam Flow Bistable Uncertainty The Channel Uncertainty for the Hi Steam Flow Bistable is derived using the following equation:

CSA = SE +/- [EA2 + PMA2 + PEA2 + (SCA + SMTE)2 + SD2 + SPE2 + STE2 +

SPSE2 + (M1 + M1MTE)2 + (M2 + M2MTE)2 + RD2 + RTE2 + RRA2]1/2 Where:

SE = 0.000% P Span EA = 0.000% P Span PMA = 0.066% P Span PEA = 3.333% P Span SCA = 0.250% P Span SMTE = 0.187% P Span SD = 0.386% P Span SPE = 0.503% P Span STE = 1.557% P Span SPSE = 0.158% P Span M1 = 0.000% P Span M1MTE = 0.000% P Span M2 = 0.500% P Span M2MTE = 0.200% P Span RD = 1.000% P Span RTE = 0.500% P Span RRA = 0.000% P Span CSA = 0.0 +/- [0.02 + 0.0662 + 3.3332 + (0.250 + 0.187)2 + 0.3862 + 0.5032 + 1.5572 +

0.1582 + (0.0 + 0.0)2 + (0.500 + 0.200)2 + 1.0002 + 0.5002 + 0.02]1/2 CSAHi Steam Flow = +/- 3.987% P Span

% Flow Span = % P Span

  • 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 2)

% Flow Span = 3.987% P Span

  • 0.5 * (4.47 x 106 PPH / 0.494 x 106 PPH) =

18.04% Flow Span CSAHi Steam Flow = 18.04% Flow Span = 0.806 x 106 PPH

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 16 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.1.19 Hi-Hi Steam Flow Bistable Uncertainty The Channel Uncertainty for the Hi-Hi Steam Flow Bistable is derived using the following equation:

CSA = SE +/- [EA2 + PMA2 + PEA2 + (SCA + SMTE)2 + SD2 + SPE2 + STE2 + SPSE2 +

(M1 + M1MTE)2 + (M2 + M2MTE)2 + RD2 + RTE2 + RRA2]1/2 Where:

SE = 0.000% P Span EA = 0.000% P Span PMA = 0.000% P Span PEA = 3.333% P Span SCA = 0.250% P Span SMTE = 0.187% P Span SD = 0.386% P Span SPE = 0.503% P Span STE = 1.557% P Span SPSE = 0.158% P Span M1 = 0.000% P Span M1MTE = 0.000% P Span M2 = 0.500% P Span M2MTE = 0.200% P Span RD = 1.000% P Span RTE = 0.500% P Span RRA = 0.000% P Span CSA = 0.0 +/- [0.02 + 0.02 + 3.3332 + (0.250 + 0.187)2 + 0.3862 + 0.5032 + 1.5572 +

0.1582 + (0.0 + 0.0)2 + (0.500 + 0.200)2 + 1.0002 + 0.5002 + 0.02]1/2 CSAHi-Hi Steam Flow = +/- 3.986% P Span

% Flow Span = % P Span

  • 0.5 * (Flow Max / Flow X) (Equation 2)

% Flow Span = 3.986% P Span

  • 0.5 * (4.47 x 106 PPH / 4.3439 x 106 PPH) =

2.051% Flow Span CSAHi-Hi Steam Flow = 2.051% Flow Span = 0.092 x 106 PPH

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 17 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2 Steam Pressure Channels P-468, P-469, P-478, P-479, P-482 and P-483 The Steam Pressure Channels provide inputs to the logic for Safeguard Actuation.

8.2.1 SE = Systematic Error No Systematic Error has been identified for these loops.

SE = 0.000% of span 8.2.2 EA = Environmental Allowance No Environmental Allowance will be used in this calculation. (Assumption 4.4)

EA = 0.000% of span 8.2.3 PMA = Process Measurement Accuracy PMA is not applicable for this loop configuration.

PMA = +/- 0.000% of span 8.2.4 PEA = Primary Element Accuracy PEA is not applicable for this loop configuration.

PEA = +/- 0.000% of span 8.2.5 SCA = Sensor Calibration Accuracy Reference 5.11 provides a transmitter calibration accuracy of +/- 0.25% of span.

SCA = +/- 0.250% of span (Reference 5.11)

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 18 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2.6 SMTE = Sensor Measuring and Test Equipment The following Measuring and Test Equipment or its equivalent is used for calibration of the transmitters:

1) SMTE1 = DMM, Fluke Model 45 or equivalent with an accuracy of +/- 0.1% of P span SMTE1 = +/- 0.100% of span (Assumption 4.2)
2) SMTE2 = 10 Test Point Resistor (TPR) with an accuracy of +/- 0.01% P span SMTE2 = +/- 0.010% of span (Reference 5.11)

The surveillance procedures for the calibration of the Steam Generator Steam Pressure transmitters (Reference 5.11) specify the use of a Deadweight Tester for the measurement of the pressure input during calibration. To allow for future changes in the calibration methods, this calculation will assume that a pressure gauge (temperature compensated) with an accuracy of +/- 2.0 psig or better is used in the calibration of the transmitter. This accuracy will bound that of the Deadweight Tester and also a Heise Handheld with Pressure Module.

3) SMTE3 = Ashcroft Pressure Gauge or equivalent (temperature compensated), 0 to 2000 psig with an accuracy of + 2.0 psig or better (Reference 5.15)

SMTE3 = +/- (2.0 psig / 1400 psig)

  • 100% (References 5.11 & 5.15)

SMTE3 = +/- 0.143% of span Therefore the Sensor Measuring and Test Equipment (SMTE) accuracy is equal to:

SMTE = [ (SMTE1 + SMTE2)2 + SMTE32 ] 1/2 SMTE = [ (0.100 + 0.010)2 + (0.143)2 ] 1/2 SMTE = +/- 0.180% of span 8.2.7 SD = Sensor Drift According to Reference 5.8 the sensors are Rosemount Model 1153 Series D Alphaline Nuclear Pressure Transmitters (Model 1153GD9RB) with a drift equal to +/- 0.2% of upper range limit (URL) for 30 months SD = +/- 0.2% * (3000 psi / 1400 psi)

SD = +/- 0.429% of span (Reference 5.8)

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 19 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2.8 SPE = Sensor Pressure Effect SPE is not applicable to this instrument configuration.

SPE = +/- 0.000% of span 8.2.9 STE = Sensor Temperature Effect The Rosemount Instruction Manual states the temperature effect for Range Code 9 is:

+/- (0.75% of URL + 0.5% span) per 100°F (Reference 5.8)

Upper Range Limit = 3000 psi (Reference 5.8)

Transmitter Span = 1400 psi (Reference 5.11)

Temperature Span = 70°F (Reference 5.20)

Note: The Environmental Qualification Plan specifies a Design Input Temperature of 120°F. It also states that the Average Temperature found at Thermocouple L1 in the Shield Building/Annulus is 78.3°F. For conservatism, this calculation will assume a minimum temperature of 50°F to account for a transmitter calibration performed when the building is at its coolest. This results in a Temperature Span of 70°F.

STE = +/- [(0.75%

  • 3000 psi / 1400 psi) + 0.5%] * (70°F / 100°F)

STE = +/- 1.475% of span 8.2.10 SPSE = Sensor Power Supply Effect The Sensor Power Supply Effect for the Steam Pressure transmitters is less than 0.005% of output span per volt. The transmitter is qualified to operate in a region ranging from a minimum of 13.5 VDC up to a maximum of 45 VDC depending upon the load resistance. (Reference 5.8)

The power supply output voltage is not checked during the performance of the transmitter calibration or the channel calibration procedures, therefore to bound all possible conditions, a power supply output tolerance of + 31.5 VDC (i.e. 45 VDC - 13.5 VDC) will be used to determine the Sensor Power Supply Effect. (References 5.11 & 5.12)

SPSE = +/- [0.00005 * (31.5 VDC / 1.0 VDC)]

  • 100% = 0.158%

SPSE = + 0.158% of span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 20 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2.11 M1 = Loop Power Supply This calculation assumes that either a Foxboro or NUS Loop Power Supply is installed. The Loop Power Supply for the process racks is used to power the transmitter current loop and is not used as a signal converter. Therefore, the calibration accuracy is equal to 0.0 % of span.

(Reference 5.12)

M1 = 0.000% of span 8.2.12 M1MTE = Loop Power Supply Measuring and Test Equipment The Loop Power Supply for the process racks is used to power the transmitter current loop.

The Loop Power Supply is not used as a signal converter and thus no calibration is required.

Therefore, M1MTE is equal to 0.0 % of span. (References 5.12)

M1MTE = 0.000% of span 8.2.13 M2 = Lead/Lag Module A Foxboro Model M/66RC-OL (or NUS equivalent module) is installed as the Lead/Lag Module.

The static calibration accuracy is +/- 0.500 % of span. (References 5.12 & 5.18)

M2 = +/- 0.500% of span 8.2.14 M2MTE = Lead/Lag Module Measuring and Test Equipment Two DMMs and two Test Point Resistors (TPR) are required to calibrate this module.

M2MTE = +/- [ (Fluke1 + TPR1)2 + (Fluke2 + TPR2)2 ]1/2 M2MTE = +/- [ (0.100 + 0.100)2 + (0.100 + 0.100)2 ]1/2 (Assumption 4.2 & Reference 5.17)

M2MTE = +/- 0.283% of span (Reference 5.12) 8.2.15 M3 = Bistable Based on Reference 5.18, either a Foxboro Model M/63U-BC or NUS Instruments Model DAM504-3 may be installed as a Steam Pressure bistable. The calibrated accuracy is

+/- 0.500 % of span.

M3 = +/- 0.500% of span (Reference 5.12)

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 21 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2.16 M3MTE = Bistable Module Measuring and Test Equipment One DMM and one Test Point Resistor (TPR) are required to calibrate this module.

M3MTE = +/- (Fluke + TPR)

M3MTE = +/- (0.100 + 0.100) (Assumption 4.2 & Reference 5.17)

M3MTE = +/- 0.200% of span (Reference 5.12) 8.2.17 RD = Rack Drift The superseded calculations specified a drift value derived from previous testing. However, that data is not current and Kewaunee is replacing Foxboro rack modules with NUS Instruments equivalents where sufficient drift trends have not been established. Therefore, the standard and conservative value of +/- 1.0% of span as referenced in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6 will be used in this calculation.

RD = +/- 1.000% of span (Reference 5.1) 8.2.18 RTE = Rack Temperature Effect For Kewaunee calculations the Rack Temperature Effect term was either assumed to be embedded in the Rack Drift term or set to zero percent of span. However, the effects of rack temperature changes have not been monitored or documented . Therefore, the standard and conservative value of +/- 0.5% of span as referenced in STD-EEN-0304, Revision 6 will be used in this calculation.

RTE = +/- 0.500% of span (Reference 5.1) 8.2.19 RRA = Rack Readability Allowance Rack Readability Allowance (RRA) is applicable for the indication portion of the loops. This calculation is only applicable to bistables and does not address indicators.

RRA = +/- 0.0% of span

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 22 of 23 C10854 0 N/A 8.2.20 Lo Steam Line Pressure Bistable Uncertainty The Channel Uncertainty for the Lo Steam Line Pressure Bistable is derived using the following equation:

CSA = SE +/- [EA2 + PMA2 + PEA2 + (SCA + SMTE)2 + SD2 + SPE2 + STE2 + SPSE2 +

(M1 + M1MTE)2 + (M2 + M2MTE)2 + (M3 + M3MTE)2 + RD2 + RTE2 + RRA2] 1/2 Where:

SE = 0.000% of span EA = 0.000% of span PMA = 0.000% of span PEA = 0.000% of span SCA = 0.250% of span SMTE = 0.180% of span SD = 0.429% of span SPE = 0.000% of span STE = 1.475% of span SPSE = 0.158% of span M1 = 0.000% of span M1MTE = 0.000% of span M2 = 0.500% of span M2MTE = 0.283% of span M3 = 0.500% of span M3MTE = 0.200% of span RD = 1.000% of span RTE = 0.500% of span RRA = 0.000% of span CSA = 0.0 +/- [0.02 + 0.02 + 0.02 + (0.250 + 0.180)2 + 0.4292 + 0.02 + 1.4752 + 0.1582 +

(0.0 + 0.0)2 + (0.500 + 0.283)2 + (0.500 + 0.200)2 + 1.0002 + 0.5002 + 0.02] 1/2 CSA = +/- 2.219% of span The Steam Pressure transmitters have a calibrated span of 0 - 1400 psig. Therefore, the CSA in process units is:

CSA = 1400 psig * (+/- 2.219% of span / 100% of span) = +/- 31.066 psig CSA = +/- 31.066 psig

Engineering Work Sheet Calculation Number: Revision: Addendum: Page 23 of 23 C10854 0 N/A

9.0 CONCLUSION

The results of the CSA calculations are as follows:

Hi Steam Flow: CSA = +/- 18.04% Flow Span = +/- 0.806 x 106 PPH Hi-Hi Steam Flow: CSA = +/- 2.051% Flow Span = +/- 0.092 x 106 PPH Lo Steam Line Pressure: CSA = +/- 2.219% of span = +/- 31.066 psig

c. {0 >54 fZe.. V. 0 Att "- c ~ M t<.. \1\ t 1 p~~ I o-f' )

'rhe nominal inlet I,D. of subject tubes is 27.9S1~; the nominal throat dia. is 16.000~; thus the ~omina: Beta ratio is 0,5724.

I 3.3.1 V.alue of ITCH and Its Basic Toleranc.e 3.3.2 The value of lie" is 0.987'3 on which the Effect of Installation on "C'f basi~

toleranc'e is+/-O. 75%

  • Since subject tubes are direct coupled to a sudden increaser and long radius elbow that precedes them~ an additional +/-O.7% tolerance must be considered on their "C'S",
3. 3.3 Behavior of uCH The fact that these tubes are used at high Rn's shoud not add to above stated "e" tolerances.

3.3.4 Jotal tolerance The Total Maximum Tolerance: +/- %

  • Due to Condition of Tube (See par. 1. in letter) 0.2
  • Basic Tolerance (See par. 3.3.1) 0.75
  • Effect of Installation (See par. 3.3.2) 0.7 Summ: 1.65 The probable accuracy of lie" should be 'Hithin:

= +/- l.l%" /"

D. Halmi Senior Principal Engineer Flow Metering & Cales B I F' 3/23/77

Calculation C10854, Rev. 0 50.59 APPLICABILITY REVIEW Attachment 2 (Is the activity excluded from 50.59 review?) Page 1 of 1

1. Document/Activity number: _C_l_08_5_4~, R_ev_is_i_on_O _
2. Brief description of proposed activity (what is being changed and why):

This calculation supercedes calculation CI0854-2, Revision 2, Cl0854-3, Revision 1 and CI0854-5, Revision O. Calculation CI0854, Revision 0 develops the Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) values associated with Kewaunee's Unit 1 Hi & Hi-Hi Steam Flo,v and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF actuation functions. This calculation supports Kewaunee's conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS).

Does the proposed activity involve or change any of the following documents or processes? Check YES or NO for EACH applicability review iteln.

3.

Explain in comments if necessary. [Ref. USA 50.59 Resource Manual] .

NOTE: Ifyou are unsure if a document or process may be affected, contact the process owner.

Yes No Document or Applicable ContactJAction

./ -/ Process Regulation Process change per LI-AA-IOI.

a 0 I8J Technical Specifications or Operating License 10CFR50.92 Contact Licensing.

Identify NRC letter in comments below. Process Activity/change previously approved by NRC in b 0 181 license amendment or NRC SER IOCFR50,90 change.

Contact Licensing for assistance.

Activity/change covered by all existing approved Identify screening or evaluation in comments below.

c 0 181 10CFRSO.59 review, screening, or evaluation.

IOCFR50 Appendix B Process change, Dominion Quality Assurance Program Description ContactQA.

d 0 181 (DOM-QA-l) 10CFRSO.54(a)

Refer to NO-AA-IOI.

ContactEP.

e 0 181 Etnergency Plan 10CFR50.54(q)

Refer to FP-R-EP-02.

Contact Security.

f D 181 Security Plan 10CFR50.54(p)

Refer to FP-S-SPE-Ol.

Contact 1ST process owner.

g D I8l 1ST Plan 10CFRSO.55a(f)

Refer to ER-AA-IST-IO.

Contact lSI process owner. Refer to h D 181 lSI Plan 10CFRSO.55a(g)

ER-AA-NDE-122, NAD-Ol.05, andNAD-05.11.

i 0 ~ BeeS Acceptance Criteria 10CFR50.46 Contact Licensing.

USAR or any document incorporated by reference -

Process USARchangeperNEP-05.02.

j 0 181 Check YES only if change is editorial (see 10CFR50.71 Contact USAR process owner for assistance.

Attachment A).

Commitment - Commitment changes associated Contact Licensing.

k D ~ with a response to Generic Letters and Bulletins, or 10CFRSO Appendix B Refer to LI-AA-I10.

if described in the USAR require a pre~screening.

Maintenance activity or new/revised maintenance Evaluate under Maintenance Rule.

procedure - Check YES only if clearly maintenance I 0 ~ and equipment will be restored to its as-designed 10CFR50.65 Refer to ER-AA-MRL-IO, ER-AA-MRL-IOO, and NAD-08.21.

condition within 90 days (see Attachment C).

New/revised administrative or managerial directive/procedure (e.g., NAD, GNP, Fleet Procedure) or a change to any procedure or other m 0 ~ controlled document (e.g., plant drawing) which is 10CFRSO Appendix B Process procedure/document revision.

clearly editorial/administrative. See Attachments A andB.

Fire Protection Program Document Change Control, n D 181 Fire Plan 10CFR50.48 GNP-05.30.01.

0 D ~ Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) 10CFR72.48 Implement DNAP-3004, starting with Applicability.

4. Conclusion. Check one of the following:

~ All documents/processes listed above are checked NO. 10CFR50.S9 applies to the proposed activity. A 50.59 pre-screening shall be perfonned.

o One or more of the doculnents/processes listed above are checked YES, AND controls all aspects of the proposed activity. 10CFRSO.59 does NOT apply. Process the change under the applicable program/process/procedure.

o One or more of the documents/processes listed above are checked YES, however, some portion of the proposed activity is not controlled by any of the above processes. 10CFRSO.59 applies to that portion. A 50.59 pre-screening shall be perfoIUled.

5. Comments:

ET-CEE-09-0009, Rev.O will transmit the 50.59/72.48 Evaluation and program/document updates.

6. Print name followed by signature. Attach completed fonn to docum t/activity/change p kage.

Prepared by: ID. Desrochers Date: /0 1Ill/If) ,

9

,...;..----"lIl~~~~---

(print/sign)

Reviewed by: D.M. McGrath Date: I o-/!£- CJ'l (print/sign)

Form GNP-04_04.01-1 Rev_ 12 Date; APR 08 2008 Page 15 of 16 INFORMATION USE

50.59 PRE-SCREENING Calculation C10854, Rev. 0 (Is a 50.59 screening required?) Attachment 3

1. Do'cumentlActivity number: CI0854, Revision 0 Page 1 of 1
2. Brief descliption of proposed activity (what is being changed and why):

This calculation snpercedes calculation CI0854-2, Revision 2, CI0854-3, Revision 1 and CI0854-5, Revision O. Calculation C10854, Revision 0 develops the Channel Statistical Allowance (CSA) values associated with Kewaunee's Unit 1 Hi & Hi-Hi Steam Flow and Low Steam Line Pressure ESF actuation functions. This calculation supports Kewaunee's conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS).

3. Does the proposed activity involve or change any of the following documents or processes? Explain in Comments if necessary.

Check YES or NO for EACH pre-screening item. [Ref. USA 50.59 Resource Manual]

NOTE: If you are unsure if a document or process may be affected, contact the process owner.

NOTE: An asterisk (*) indicates that the document is incorporated by reference in the USAR or is implicitly considered part of the USAR.

NOTE: Check NO if activity/change is considered editorial) administrative, or maintenance as defmed in Attachments A, B, and C. Explain in Comments if necessary.

Directive!

Yes"" No,/ DocumentIProcess Procedure a D r8l Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) NEP-05.02 LI-AA-IOI, b D ~

  • Technical Specifications Bases or Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) U-AA-IOI-lOOl c D ~
  • Commitments made in response to NRC Generic Letters and Bulletins, and those described in the USAR LI-AA-ll0 d D ~
  • Environmental Qualification (EQ) Plan NAn-Ol.08 e D ~
  • Fire Plan NAD-Ol.02 g D ~
  • Appendix R Design Description NAD-Ol.02 h D ~
  • Radiological Environmental Monitoring Manual (REMM) NAD-05.13 k D ~
  • Station Blackout Design Description 1 D ~
  • Control Room Habitability Study Plant Drawing ChangeslDiscrepancies-Check YES only if: 1) the change adds information to, deletes information m D ~ from, or alters the configuration of a drawing that is incorporated in the USAR, or 2) configures an SSC NAn-OS.O!

differently than described or credited in USAR text.

CalculationslEvaIuations/Analyses/Computer Software - Check YES only if: 1) It affects a method of evaluation n D ~ described in the USAR, or 2) It independently (i.e., not part of a modification) affects the licensing or design basis.

Various 0 D ~ Pennanent Plant Physical Changes - All require a screening. NAD-04.03 Temporary Plant Physical Changes (TCRs) - Check No only if installed for maintenance AND in effect for less p D ~ than 90 days at power conditions.

NAD-04.03 QA Typing Determinations - Check YES only if reduction in classification, or affects design function as described q D [gI inUSAR.

NAn-01.0t r D ~ Setpoint or Acceptance Criteria - Check YES only if change affects plant monitoring, pelforrnance, or operation. Various Plant ProcedureslRevisions - Check YES only if the change directly or indirectly involves operating, controlling s D ~ or configuring an SSC differently than described or credited in U8AR.

NAD-03.01 t D ~ Engineering Specifications - Check YES only if a design function ,or design requirement may be affected. NAD-05.03 Operations Night Orders or Operator Work Arounds - Check YES only if SSCs are operated or configured u D ~ differently than described in D8AR.

GNP-03.30.01 NAD-08.l4, Temporary plant alterations (e.g., jumpers, scaffolding, shielding, barriers) - Check YES only if installed (or in GMP-127, v D ~ effect) for maintenance for longer than 90 days at power conditions. GNP~01.23.04, FPP-08-09 w D ~ Temporary plant alterations ~ Check YES only if not associated with maintenance.

Corrective/Compensatory Actions - Check YES only if degraded/non-confonning plant condition accepted "as-is" x D ~ or compensatory action taken.

OP-AA-I02 4 Conclusion. Check one of the following:

~ All of the documents or processes listed above are checked NO. A 50.59 screening is NOT required. Process change in accordance with the applicable program/process/procedure.

D One or more of the documents or processes listed above are checked YES. A 50.59 screening shall be perfonned.

5 Corrunents:

ET-CEE-09-0009, Rev.O will transmit the 50.59/72.48 Evaluation and program/document updates.

6 ~::~~ followed by signature. Either the preparer or reviewerfShfjan be~50'59 screening qualified. Attach completed fann to document/activity/change Pr~pare,d by: J.D. Desrochers I Date: J(J IIA/la, (pont/SIgn)

Reviewed by: D,M. McGrath " .

r -~

~ Date: La ~ /y I (J J ,0

'-IJ~

(print/sign)

Form GNP-04.04.01-2 Rev. 12 Date: APR 08 2008 Page 16 of 16 INFORMATION USE