ML19325C469: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
Line 42: Line 42:
                               . report contains separate sections'on the salt deposition, native                                                              !
                               . report contains separate sections'on the salt deposition, native                                                              !
vegetation, soil, and comparative studies.
vegetation, soil, and comparative studies.
;'
The''results of the monitoring activities show that only minor, localized effects of cooling tower drift deposition are occurring. Higher deposition rates potentially attributable to-the cooling tower were measured at only one location, which is on station property at a distance of 0.4 km downwind of the cooling l                              tower,-and even these. highest deposition levels are well below L                              the. deposition levels that have been reported to cause vegetative                                                            ,
The''results of the monitoring activities show that only minor, localized effects of cooling tower drift deposition are occurring. Higher deposition rates potentially attributable to-the cooling tower were measured at only one location, which is on station property at a distance of 0.4 km downwind of the cooling l                              tower,-and even these. highest deposition levels are well below L                              the. deposition levels that have been reported to cause vegetative                                                            ,
damage. ' Hope Creek Generating Station is surrounded by extensive                                                          ~l areasiof. tidal salt marsh and the nearest uplands are located                                                                  j l                              approximately three miles to the east, therefore, no significant                                                              i p                              adverse' impacts can occur as a result of cooling tower operation.                                                            ;
damage. ' Hope Creek Generating Station is surrounded by extensive                                                          ~l areasiof. tidal salt marsh and the nearest uplands are located                                                                  j l                              approximately three miles to the east, therefore, no significant                                                              i p                              adverse' impacts can occur as a result of cooling tower operation.                                                            ;
Line 67: Line 66:
C    Mr. C.1Y. Shiraki                                          i Licensing Project Manager                                I Mr. D. K. Allsopp Resident Inspector Mr. W. T. Russell, Administrator.
C    Mr. C.1Y. Shiraki                                          i Licensing Project Manager                                I Mr. D. K. Allsopp Resident Inspector Mr. W. T. Russell, Administrator.
Region I Mr. Kent Tosch,; Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 t
Region I Mr. Kent Tosch,; Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 t
;
l' I
l' I
l L
l L
_}}
_}}

Revision as of 18:25, 18 February 2020

Forwards Operational Summary Rept for Hope Creek Generating Station Salt Drift Monitoring Program,Jan 1987 - Mar 1989. Results of Monitoring Activity Show Only Minor Localized Effects of Cooling Tower Drift Deposition
ML19325C469
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek 
Issue date: 10/10/1989
From: Miltenberger S
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19325C470 List:
References
NLR-N89201, NUDOCS 8910160288
Download: ML19325C469 (3)


Text

"

grm N- -

1

,r T, '.

,[ dv % - ' '

C '

3 e, w-a r

' ., , Public Service

, ' < Electric and Gas

,  : Company -

Steven E. Mittenberger . Public Service Electric and Gas Company ' P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609-339-4199

, .-Vce Pres! dent and Chet Nuclear Orfeer -- .

NLR-N89201'

- U'. S ; Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington,:DC .

20555

Gentlemen:.

COOLING. TOWER SALT DRIFT MONITORING PROGRAM C FINAL: OPERATIONAL

SUMMARY

REPORT HOPE CREEK GENERATING' STATION DOCKETENO. 50-354

' Pursuant lto the requirements of Section 4.2.2 of Appendix B to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, the Environmental Protection Plan, Public Service Electric and Gas hereby submits ,

.the' attached report, entitled " Operational Summary Report for J Hope Creek' Generating Station Salt Drift Monitoring Program, January 1987 to March 1989."

, This. report summarizes the results of the operational phase monitoring: program conducted to determine the potential for l- oadverse effects of cooling tower salt drift on vegetation and soils in.the vicinity of Hope Creek Generating Station. The l

. report contains separate sections'on the salt deposition, native  !

vegetation, soil, and comparative studies.

Theresults of the monitoring activities show that only minor, localized effects of cooling tower drift deposition are occurring. Higher deposition rates potentially attributable to-the cooling tower were measured at only one location, which is on station property at a distance of 0.4 km downwind of the cooling l tower,-and even these. highest deposition levels are well below L the. deposition levels that have been reported to cause vegetative ,

damage. ' Hope Creek Generating Station is surrounded by extensive ~l areasiof. tidal salt marsh and the nearest uplands are located j l approximately three miles to the east, therefore, no significant i p adverse' impacts can occur as a result of cooling tower operation.  ;

BOO {

f s

?

8910160288 891010 DR ADOCK0500gg4 t

r w

Document Control Desk DCT1O1999 NLR-N89201 i

As stated in Section 4.2.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan, the' salt drift monitoring program is to continue up to three years from receipt of license and-annual monitoring reports are to be submitted-to the NRC for review. PSE&G has previously submitted all annual monitoring reports and submittal of the attached " Operational Summary Report" demonstrates that the program continued for three years from receipt of license.

Therefore, PSE&G has satisfied the commitments under Section 4.2.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan and this issue is considered closed.

Sincerely,

, . .% W Attachment l

7- -

!/

v

.; < i; e .

e e

~

p y h$y o. WTf W:

1 l

C Mr. C.1Y. Shiraki i Licensing Project Manager I Mr. D. K. Allsopp Resident Inspector Mr. W. T. Russell, Administrator.

Region I Mr. Kent Tosch,; Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 t

l' I

l L

_