ML17286A695

Forwards Data Logs for Control Room Visits for 910313-0402, Per Util 910329 Ltr

ML17286A695
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	04/02/1991
From:	John Baker WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Perkins K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
NUDOCS 9104170034
Download: ML17286A695 (99)

Text

..ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTR ATION SYS1 EM REGULATORY -INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

.ACCESSION NBR:9104170034 DOC.DATE: 91/04/02 NOTARIZED'O DOCKET 4 FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 050003 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BAKER,J.W. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PERKINS,K. Region 5 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Forwards data logs for control room visits for 910313-0402, per util 910329 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ( ENCL TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response g SIZE: ail D

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL A PD5 PD 1 1 ENG,P.L. 1 1 D

INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD '1 1 AEOD/DE DEDRO I IB 1 1 AEOD/TPAB 1 1 D 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D 1 1 NRR SHANKMAN,S 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D 1 1 NRR/DRIS/DIR 1 1 NRR/DST/DIR SE2 1 1 NRR/PMASQILRID2 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OE 1 1 OGC/HDS1 1 1 RE ILE OM 1 1 RGN5 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EGGG/BRYCE, J. H. 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 D

D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISI'RIBUTION LISIS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 24 ENCL 24

1 1l \

1

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 96B ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 April 2, 1991 Ken Perkins United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

DATA LOGS OF CONTROL ROOM VISITS Please find enclosed the data logs of the Control Room visits for the time period, March 13 through April 2, 1991, per our letter dated March 29, 1991.

Sincerely, J . Baker P-2 Plant Manager sg Enclosures 9104 0034 910402 05000397 PDR OCK ADOC R

ge-8/

WASII INC?O'I PI HLIC'0% HH NUCI KAR OPKRATION STANDARD C3l SUPPLY SYSTEi>I NUMSKRI FUNCTIONAL MANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION PACK: 7 OP ~ RKV~. 1 HNP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM DATE: +// ) 7 MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS I. ASSIGNED PERSONS: TIME IN: l~ OUT:

2. SHIF": "'HIFT MGR.: NR+A 3. SHIFT: SHIFT MGR.:

4. BUILDING(S) VISITED:

Reactor Turbine Generator Radwaste General Service Diesel Generator Other

5.

GENERAL COMMENT

S: gdlEPPQ ~IC~ED CA-W Q~giggg gag +//p~p f)Typ/~I,

~~C)y OF@'F6>o&~f&E8(7&I, 6oAPvcy oF= ~rnf oA g/(y-~.

~cJ~JCc~f

6. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

~ GuP~ z~P F~cLPFp CPu&57)ad+

(Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift lianger).

7. RECOMMEHDATIOHS: (Observations of a long-tern nature for poss>b]e implovements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operati'on.

g. Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.-

res ) No I I

~- ATTACHMENT 1 I'91 pp 1 y-pp3-~

040 K22DS PINT)

WASH IPCZO'5 tl ~ LIC tOll CA NUCl EAR OPERATION STANDARO 43 SUPPLY SYSTEFuI NUMIIKR:

FUNCTIONAL MANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION PACK: 7 OF 7 ~ RKV 1 HHP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM HATE:

MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS

l. ASSIGNED PERSONS: / TIME IH @~SIGHT. O7<5'.

SHIFT: SHEFT HGR.: C4 l/O/J 3. SHIFT. SHZFT MGR .

4. BUILDING(S) VISITED:

Reactor Turbine Generator Radwaste General Service Diesel'enerator Other

5.

GENERAL COMMENT

S: gg(pp~p ((CASE-./F C/l&i/ /4N/3+//'l goFE~IIF S/7~/o, geSGCT S o/- Ax~o/a II 4W&iAIG, Ccpv4'uoT'F &m///r ore/ P/~q -g-o, 4IXPIF'&vTS PO+ ~/ I IFH//F FIPCPFD glu+SP~

6. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: (Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

ct

7. RECOMMENDATIONS: (Observations of a long-tern nature for possible improvements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation.

9. Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.;

rr "es I I Ho)

ATTACHMENT 1

$ 44 22205 I2/$ 7)

FIELD BSERVATIQN Observer Crew/Employem Scope of 3ob Observed mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

'lease RATINGS Not at All Gcncrally Complctcly Was the crew/individual.properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, procedures)? 'nowledge, Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

I

.3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed? t Ig

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 /Q

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2 < J~

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices l~+QQ Q Q ll Concerns:

Comments .~ t r 5ÃaM i rA QlA~

~

lQ ~ u UP >w NXLC. J AM Recommendations:

4 lg (i

~ -'(

jj; gisi4~~(.c"

~~)(gg ptv l ~~'f

l)Pi'c'cN ~~"~

1p/g+ Q// p~P/pl\I Z f'+A~

f I

i'g.

g~gp gg~g >g/4d/IK ~Ã + ~

( .. ~

~

,g~.

/

) J ~,

p r'pgJ P/5~&l

>J < ~ ~~g;idge I

( )

~ M 4 Wjt/ /

~if ~ n~

g~$ > @%4' V g ~

'E Cl'V l~ " I ~

lf

~

'i.pi'

)er. S~ ,t ..~

@l~, k!aJ

'~g)b i" ~'>>9'~~

o&'~

ob)5. Z--:,.;-=;."

54k 4

~k 5

b"I +5%

e4vph i~+A J

~

~

~ I p'X I

,CIA~ii $ g>v,+, >(w sFa< a, f . yA y7g '~ @vs' . e .~'gs ~

'vg S

,; ':-'

'i': '..-"';,:. ~i:.".::.."-:?'""'.=,,.',"- --..".,; ".":.

V Observer Scope

'ate Crew/Employees of Job Observed LD BSERVATI N Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All GcncraHy Complctcly I. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Weresafeworkpractices foHowed? ~)p,

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements? Qp

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good hoeseheepiog practiced i (p,

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary? 5[<

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events '?

~ j

~ ~

iQ a

"<3'+r igudq~qvj 'l~~ ~ ~o/,

il(ea p~~ '~~ .

I I

I r'r ~'.

p.>,,~~ ~~<(~ .4 fifo+ llrlin4 t l

year r (fg~()zip~<~ I I

't.~

1 i

t 'b 1I b /,J4) ~~h l0r~~"+~~~

IA

\ ,g,.g 4z ~>jl, cw~ C

~ ',c<

r'.l C

I 4

~ e

~ ' &*SNIHCTO'I PS SLID P014CH , NIICLEAR OPERATION STANOARO 49 SUPPLY SYSTEI>I i'

NuMDERI FUNCTIONAL MANUAL I FOR NUCLEAR OPERATlON FACET 7 OF ~ REV. 1

.HHP-2 MAHAGEMEHT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM N~T/9( Pe~ vis'lT'ATE:

MAHAGEMEHT OBSERVATIOHS

l. ASSIGiTEO PERSONS: IN:/OSS OUT: J//D

2. SHIFT: SHIFT MGR '~~ '4 3.

SHIFT'INESHIFT MGR

4. BUILDIHG(S) VISITED:

Reactor ~ Turbine Generator Radwaste General Service Diesel Generator Other S. GENERAL COHMEHTS: QE(PPGP Q~J'iCP QQ~ /PPQjggggf g~

, YiE~7M~, &Mw 'eAq~~& F>< 7(lg 4P DD'CSJiCP ~OP ggPL iriCPPt&~.I'Ag F> k<Ogy EP~~~><~>

6. CORRECTIVE ACTIOHS: (Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

RECOMMEHDATIOHS: (Observations of a long-term nature for possible improvemenI.S in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

'8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on performance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation..

9 Team members should indicato below if they desire feodback on actions taken to be taken, resulting from their observations. '-

Yes [ Ho [

~ SHC E22D I rifC7)

ATTACHMENT 1

WASHIMCZO'0 PI ~ LIC POL CM ~, . *. % ~ NVCI.KAR OtKRATION STANOARD 4D SUPPLY SYSTEi>i NUMIIKRR F UNCTIONALMANUAL FOR NUCLEAR OPERATION tACK 7 OF 7, RKV. 1 HNP-2 MANAGEMENT HALKTHROUGH PROGRAM OATS: >//<F MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS

1. ASSIGHEO PERSONS: < TIME IN:O~NWUT.. O~~

2. SHIF: SHIFT MGR.: ++ ~+ S. SHIFT: 5 IFT HGR.:

4. BUILDING(S) VISITED:

Reactor Turbine Generator Radwaste General Service Diesel Generator Other S.

GENERAL COMMENT

S: QPg +~+ P+~ gg/gPj~g P5~

~~us C ~lq 5'IEG ~$ 76 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: (Observations requiring, or potentially requiring immediate action by the Shift Manger).

7. RECOMMEHDATIONS: (Observations of a long-term nature for posEs>hie improvements in operations, maintenance, equipment, and safety).

8. Management of supporting organizations should provide observations on perl orll ance of software/hardware provided to support HHP-2 operation.

9. Team members should indicate below if they desire feedback on actions taken, or to be taken, resulting from their observations.

'es

) Ho )

w' ATTACHMENT 1 SCS 2220i Pf$ 7)

t I C~.

4 p+3(I5 Qt g

~~

~-,pg (/>,Mceiiw(i'>0<~ Pl>.

f,':,. ~~</ <'Irjy,<>>// V%5 8~I t ~l 4

p ~/g~u,i,nr e.4 p""

Lrh ls I' f'~ ' 9ij.'. k., "g f

P'<<4 h

~

'.A 0

'8

Ii >

, Ij.-=

/~fj pg j~ f j gg/Q (Ilk~/ISA ll P >

lt~lgp g( ppJ $ /Pl /' f~

6 \ ~ h 4'+tK

(~p <J~

g/n~,~e.g/p('iSCPf k": "I .1' 'J ~+4 '4:"-

t (x j ip (/(gjpg$ /iPV(A I 07- AP

~

/p(~((p p )'/IIJ/ "Q FQ PiI l~>~~ <~ f"~ Pj'~~~p;g

~

r Qp;p! gpj~~P ~~

~

I

~ I

e Observer Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed '( FIELD B ERVATI N dQ Date Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

Not ct All RATINGS Generally Completely Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2 I

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

A4 AQltd 4'a '.8 U PA ( w d+

Aw )

r Recommendations:

~ 'W t&wQ!rp . '( +'s~gp~.~g'~>gct+4') "g:. trip~

p pj J ) A 1 V P I~$ 1j'tp\f 4 5 Qflf~ . \ ~N QPJk CakR:i; ll~

I jJI1'lazilyH.

~tpg3. (~ 4b QCjr~j I j/g<>.,>gp,g/Q l Pll ~+<A /

r.(.I~>," ~,a iii~W~~'~ ' "~J~~

i'(((-, Ws>f.g g$ g~i~ fj!viue-

~4 l~

+'~~ @~~

I pl g (g p ()g~l', ~ ÃkWI)ff y jC

~>> glcl,A ~

~""I

~swJ.~7ivih 4+'~~"+

g~ J~y/,Q> glry'l~~

Mals S'I' g(y - y7 D - pGPi (u'r($a i~-Ho,Ab ~~i .,g~ l>$ (>e~r~4

@.'81 "Q 4'~ g iver p "+ cy~Prjdp~ SC<NF'HO

~ $@g /r7~)lji>'/(i gy,j/ e~z vsse'v)e)1)

W. g +Cw, f~~ '~gt 'w '+-, C .crt>+, ~~~pl ',db -+'f"Q~yQ W,dpvY'j~g.'~~oyr.V~w',~~iy~r~'ilp~~g~A~

R-6 '4 5 gg]R)oY tg(c~+

gg) f gp),gtPCg/')$ g~~k>>dl,tfl~j ~f4...~-.

A $e pC 6~Jbc,,

~~1 J

a. ~

~C

5j lpljPL( ~I~7 gg(O .. +g joe@( / c~, fjgcÃ$"

p,~oa!c ) l,A~

~

~c OP<"

'~

.!'],.Pc.l )y. (cia'l/1~

)K,

~~j j f( C<.

g,J~ f(yr f( $ gf 5p9$ f(

gp[~c:( ( z:xb 4" "."" ~li= ~"""~1 .-..

,: ( /.< f pup& <

peek~

j w, ~~a,wryq>SPg~.if I,

c, l

) Q/i 0pf 8/aPi S>V<14 g c/g p$ p$ p

~y Y"" ~0r';

'$i~g~r,9 (~i C'0 f QQ~IQ~~

(

(~ri V~

/,

PoliCq,.< l~~ ~< j

(

)(.-,Qgle Jco co 0en i p kd 'L<~~

f,j

~ ~

g ~p

' g

() i J( 5( ii> f)<('YQPI

~

q

+ cd/)~ Ik

,., ~/,Lly s,--:a I:/ i oi i. ~~,i//." P"4'~<s~. ~

gyp'

'~~~

0

~i~<<

- j>/t, o,a ( s.~4k~

lvee '~o~ *

(/1 g~ r-k ~khi"--':-:-..".,"'.",:;.".".':-::::.",".";."-':"::,'-":='

~ ~~].Q~J Q g~e.l~C 4s);Jag.

jQg~- $<zlzppJ k))k 9m". I(lcL+

r~ 'c ark <:.O'D Pea Itl'"'; g p J"'gq,.

1

" o(Q. Kll SALVE'-I ~ll"tk Qoj~1 si'J8 V'Idp 4 fjJyj'iiif r

t

)h.> ..., ~,ss pi's, >' ',~a . ~' ~ i,> ee <~ m~ '

>y;m~ >m,>>, a'~:c ~c-~ >+ . > ~', +a ~pa ct~

<' g,' ~

LD B ERVATI N Q5c Observer . Date Crew/Bnployees- '4146%~

Scope of Job Observed ~ 1 Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the

'ob?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eQ'ectively?

r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practrces

'oncerns:

Comments ~

~

lltA

~

0(- ILJ I Recommendations:

LD BSERVATI e/

Observer: Date:

Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed Age 6F Q*>f 1 Roi2. A~i4t tt4<

Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions, Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2 I

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and Itnowledgeable to perform the job  ?

II

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 >1p, 5, Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 H) ~

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary '?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

0 Good Practices:

Concerns Comments '

~

~

l lk +i 0i Q6 'M A. f 'Uhb lW I, 6W 'T Abbe ~ 4 QQ 74< QUA Pi~pQQ~J r

Recommendations:

0

~ ~

Alai'<)Br'g~~$

- P ra~ lQ' o

~

(,iq prl~(

'C gv)8 l]Bh~'<IPÃqy. 'p)g I

/

oi~lo i'Ji~ci..s~gp/n~~ ~'"~

""',.j~

~E;,ling jSW - vl5 5]yul"r+ -k' w&dk i~ Sk 6A ~

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Date: ~ ~ F 0 0-c3 GO Crew/Employees .

h Scopeof JobObserved ~ 0 JYG eche fj-c7-t Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

Not at All Gcnctally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used atid adhered to aS reqtured??

0 Qg~U~ ~+Qt- ~g~ /sS ~

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was C>

e usedeffecgvely?

euN', e)C~ 5 4gaS g~/ ~ ~g Qra P j Nas

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Didcrewfunctio asatyamtocompletethejob? Scum EC sinu.

pr c~~s

9. Was the crew ab to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall perfonnance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments:

Recommendations:

FIELD B ERV TI N Observer Date Crew/Employees of Job 'cope Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Complctcly

1. Was the crew/mdividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

'.'-".~ 2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were. crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 t"lp,

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 Qg

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced? Qp,

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall perfonnance of'the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

KlAAi Ct ~5~ WO P r

Recommendations:

w ~

++'j+~,l~ ~+g4>+g+rQ+ '~~Jy+)w ~~i WFd qg~k~myÃp~p+4C'/gyes

~pg ~vo/ v~ /~/o l

z +v~.'p ~ .s r $ ) .i&PQ'pW~~++ lS'~p >>~ i>Q ~

• f8'. "'+

~

J (fpgpJ Ck(V~gcg,cA, 7Pilg gp,(gQJn 1

p "~b-~~'~

Jgqiq +~. gS >g<f'I F

&PM '- ~A I MA4 8'~ &~iM~ Jr 3

FIELD B ERVATI Observer: Date: zo Rl Crew/Employees ' UKAhg Scope of Job Observed mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

'lease RATINGS Not at All Gcncrally Complctcly Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

Were procedures used and adhered to as required 2

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 t ) p,

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events '?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

r Recommendations:

Observer

'FIELD J Q.Y-ey B ERVATI ]70m

~/qy

- /8'Ia Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed /cue Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Completely

1. Was the crew findividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

rt

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

C Comments cJ 5er. w Roeeauuenrhions:

o r/~ (~l~w 'T J&L ~+~~

/>pp/Jjf-Qi/f~

](~ )(f~ g)~) y'pH~

j~'j~~lp~

p(/,.>p,c Hy. /I(n/sp I z ~c~'zw~, bled<

f,p

/i/>s! ~s V,

7 ".:.'.s.", .~.'P....":i.>

P.

/g% pJ,// dl/AP Pi'd7I P<j~

h qg pJC~5cj+ (jlig l5P~Cf~ ~PA

~(

~gf~ $ ~ 4 sdl&04 leSu <~irZ~:W:.~,.

k wP>> oj < s'4/c~~~~v>l >=% ~~ f'~+!

p/~)g 4j h~)i~ (icgf"po.~ E~,

ph10'~p

FIELD 8 ERVATI N p zljf/

Crew/Employees

~

Scope of Job Observed '

~+K g ~ r~~~se w P.Lc. ~~ z~g ~ram

~

ue Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not ac AH Gcncrdly Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (l.e., tools, I

knowledge, I procedures)? ~

~

~ ~

2.I Were procedures used and adhered to as required??~

.~

~

~ ~~~

~

I~

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectauons?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns Co ments:

Recommendations:

9~;g ,(.., el~i P ~+a i'g( gg.g(~ pc~'s a~J O':J '4'r"'< Hie j~ l p//

nii c...(0

() (/ ~gag ggy(vlf/zj

@ icing, g(ia~rl (risc/AieJ lie'v)~~ ~,'~i&.f '"~ I'"i'.

7 7.

it< " r r-*~

j, h

d'- i'(id/~ Pl4-,i

()I;,ir) py/~i -cu:

<~ ~>,'"'""~i Jr'~ "~"~ 'L ~

)"' ".-',-:.-'"-'.,

~ I

FIELD BSER I/'ATI N Observer . >/z,~i~ I Qd Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

'lease RATINGS Not at AH Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2.. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?,

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments Recommendations:

0 R,l'~,,'g e/w P 'I'gc.

ck~'> '"~ ~ ~ - 'Q p.~

i >~i~.>s Ql,.~~( ~ i ii

)Ii/ ~ tn g7p77IZ 07' lP"'~~'gpl..ll pl(-.<d ~ I

'l

'rg

~FIELD B ~AD N Observer Date:

'rew/Employees Q of Job Observed

'cope nt tlt2%

Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 lg

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 + 1 q

6. Was time used effectively 2

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:.

Recommendations:

ytz.~

Q@pJ 6/jQ u iiiq)g

)A+

~~49>g ~>'~alii rcislvcTe)$'] 4(cl~k~l9 QLc(q 4g~

~ <0 P@/ 'CO Cr.'~J~JJ(

I I

gP( 75 "(e! ' n ale(;" ader.-"(~<+

I. it, T ~

l )

fi44. i ~44'/44 gd 4~4.m ,'gP

~ .IS>l<

I@I '(/Cu~

I

~ '" 4 4 ~

4 ~ ~

4

7f Su;I >b/

go5 p, ~p ~j~,,m o(p/

lb J 5qngcaZ I.J~s'd>,

9~v).l g(ISzc 'sr'/pg

/~((~<'w)1 c>>dv>y")u< (s( i >II <ale(j(.)

I

~g ~i@~

f fPy!Pc~'>'le> '>)~~i'~~i li." can) g~ ci.p(pg ((c~~~

P 1

, .(

j P;

Ob5e&, J

~ /pro Sl",/rijJc~79'~ ~"'0

~'s ~~gyp (g>qqe. i vz Rn~~ hA) <$ A))~k <3Pt,'>l I Bs,c

+io s> e lv~e uyp, ( 5/7-fj( PISA aiwl,,

,p>g-g~

y us b'Pli C./Q u> k<x nC'g~ g> C~ ~i> (gu$ c~ i~ r'I'"~ r " g

~

a~q.ski f~;".'-~ L~~- <<':"~~/

l~iZO ke ~~~a )Joe HR"'-:-~ I 0 (a h>c ) Ici:;)/<~/l l55'<(

LD B ERVATl N Date Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

'lease RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (icos tools, I

knowledge, procedures)?

1 ~

~

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?? ~

.I tt ~

~

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the

~

job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11 ~ Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisQed with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

~AJ/

Recommendations:

0 1

i T~ s(~

og) p (pi ~yfly) re~~ l~0 0.

+4ynRQ $gpup~ -IJI1i4'tu&

Ay/n ((fop((gc(c, 5" /I Elpfpw . IV >

s>q p~wV<~'5SL~~> l7jgcz%J p4o7J ~

s e <<;< &~4~@ pres ~+i~~~

v>)~lr iN~."/" piAlf, ~

1 p, ~ .

Observer Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed

's FIELD B ERVATI N lK 'rAL Date:

Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2 8(g

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements? tJ)<

6. Was time used effectively?

~

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments 0

Wo Recommendations:

iud. ~l~1 I

4'"-" ) 0/ I <<~7<< I l.'."-.",-'

'>rwi>>'i' r/75k~ <"<<<<',

4,','gA'~

<< ~

jg,>aod ldk-i~1~ 7'

~p, fClr~<</}YQ 4'~ ""j I ~ J

~

i t ) n -~L 8 L . iv'

~ r

~ 1%

P

0 "P y, .p I ~ + ~

'/

'k-ng+ge "ski+;~~~( ~P~)pg.")qs'~pqg)+'~v) ~~/rf ~v. a r j

(p~

vd<v- f~~p,g cdi~l ~~~ ~>0/~

p-,sc gc

,z,lq pg,~~/tJ ~)p

~c ~

(y~ivq- pJ <<'4 ll'jhow al ~

f l (gp+4'I Wl P g4~ C))g, (4i'.3 leap~

a c. $ V'J4l. 4

~My p,

~:u)'r)AJq <~ 0",

Ccats<+>

lq~/QM5 4

~ a": >'

P"

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer

'rew/Employees Scope of Job Observed whse W- ACE Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not ar All Gcncrally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (i.e., tools,

~

knowledge, procedures)?

1 ~

s

~

~

2.t Were procedures used and adhered to as required?I

~

~

3.~~Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the ~

job  ?

4. Were safe work practices foHowed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eH'ectively?

r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

A 1

C Ci

/P~

Comments:

~r~

Recommendations:

'o LD B ERVATI N Observer Date '

780 Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All , Generally Complctcly

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge,t procedures)? ?I

~

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?? ~

y II ~

~

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the

~

job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions w.hen necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

zY Reeetnfnendntions:

FIELD B ERVATI N Observer Crew/E ploy~.

$ gbPbof JbbQbmgyee ~ W IV U 4+vef' c/cell 0+zehu Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at AH GcncraHy Complctcly

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ? I w ~"

Qa7 OQS'EAtl b

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively 2 r

7. Was good housekeeping practiced? oSsegv

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2 ogSdgtl b

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2 g/07

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Excel/cub Auuover rummy Sou reserve 4 6'/8S'. AeC orsouucC.

u~gershseI duhio'uAS(e. A- ~. ge ~s s'umber ~

zxbe a ouZA~ev'u N uA ad~ li hb-lleierf ed dJ'g comme&a'onc~:

OVgrn + g 7~ dree ru o(tu'ia ra& Sfidd eou~~C(

iubovt Pie recent/ 4 euiu s aoiZ ruhr the kkre hoick r..e .

'rem~iHo~ Fime oNcreo e,k,

'reio Noo.bu Ala i/A creius h irld euh hk cueie oive ',::-:.

tlo 4. 4us i e hAve Ar reAdrebou o . o4-c.

ek . (A's oveee.'oos'ue /euoov ~gag rioov.

Recommendations: ouF .

1

"=- g6pv j~4u ~~dao'<<~ ~

~

I L/7 3, ~r I

1 1 ISS < $ 1<V gpss

'50'/r i~ d~~< J.~/~+'

)gp~ g'(halo~~ ~q ~j, l)~i J~ ~ Tl~

p~ e,~P g gl(5 y qiy>,~j,gQ pm@ p+~~C zgzg -$g(~~ io (4,~4{' AnA WC' (cyr l~<IC<pi" i 5-i ~/'

c- g rP~i5 ~,

l~q g~<~ y~( )~/kc P + p~~~'Pi,C>~

u CdR5g $ 8+

J'

~ I~

pO ) P I SoliIl h;6) lf'CS, <" ~ ~~~

cu.

(() <d~~ A, i$

f)~ /isaac coR~7@u,q s~i~5ts R>g '~<erik tz,h> sh~qrs 5~'wr p"e U N3vugp d>~ a - /Vu slpwpl+pj'j$

fp.gQ/ -( j pMJtVKl)4'8r&lg

>i [t FP4v gQ g~jg L'np pJ 2,',

14>k W( a/. ~p.

i C

~ II&

C gq(- 4k $ SvP.z.-(~inc /4<) I s~I- 4t(.l co.~4+5)~g I

V G~ J)g~f( cut'a$ Spew ~Rp<)pp, L(D, js July )1ygp vgiiq ~(o kgb Og;l!>>~ 'CS ;C Ik 2 'a q[y l f'i pig i5fiRS  ;*)4, 4' P

LD B ERVA N Observer: Date 3 lRJ /f0-~Q~

Crew/Employees i8~c ~~ /9CW SP8.

of Job Obeereef

'cope Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All GeneraHy Completely

1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (Le., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements?

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was'good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when ne"-"sary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concans:

Comments:

Ca~

Recommendations:

~

J

~" r~w

~l lr) y,g Hctv~1 - (<g + f 8 Q%  !

I Oh'~ pjl I p~Q J I

0lsr VlSee(flleil s]8k<'~l)r. jl/i/ ~ropy kg":j:

P

~ ~8'r<~h~~4oy~s. ".4" .L-c h

l~~,qp,~%I,:;cI "I,/QV(

E (41( r

<<ii >c.(. L(  ;,'

~ 8 P

gC'.

FIELD B ERVATIQN Observer Date:

Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures) 2 Were procedures used and.adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2 ~p

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity. of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

omments:

I Recommendations:

I - ' - t

> ~

~ w:"~ ~

qz ~,.',,' '.",,'Z," ' ' ~ .. ~ 4 C C j.s,'" '!t'j- s ..s .. ', >~- ~ >.

' 'P "~i ~ ..~..i.

~ i'~>; ~;;-i Q.r ~, ~," "~~ . ',: ~~. '; ',:.. ',!<; ".;.. ~ i:e 4 I i

$ p) ppp u) (Yld;Jp~

Cl l~~ lll4>> Rid'l+l k~ ~~

OLenL~A A~i.~W i&,3 (g~ I gi

[VOrrl~ [~p<Cp<'/~,

(a~le /we, z)( I'p

"":"> Ewe e~~

~

>~~i PVo(dj d

(81m .

s'~pvkk

-p~ A'~hV'. QTjj A< Gp~

l>

LD B RVATI N Observer: Date: i9 Crew/Employees Scope of Job Observed Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.'ATINGS Not at All Gcncrally CompIctcly

. 1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (l.e., tools, knowledge, procedures) '?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately skilled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2 ~J >

6. Was time used effectively 2

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job 2

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events?

Good Practices:

Concerns Comments:

Recommendations:

LD B RV N Observer: ~ 7 /MZ/ZOl I) do/>= Blu~

did l8>c IC ~ Ze Jc's SFiP Cfc dry ~ + y7 Scope of Job Observed. O~ Wl Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

Not ac All Genaally Completely

1. Was the crew/individual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed?

5. Are workers adhering to the radiolo ical work requirements?

+6 cuw ~&~Ay

6. Was time used effectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced?

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary?

~ID k .$85+

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations?

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations?

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of evems?

Good Practices:

Concerns:

Comments:

ke 8 E &~. 3(~cu <<.D ~

jib~

CX~ m ~~ C"g.~. i*

~Le M~M ~~,

Observer Crew/Employees Scope of Job

'D Observed . g.o 0 B ERVATI N gzlRI Please mark an (x) in the column that best answers the following questions. Indicate N/A ifnot applicable.

RATINGS Not at All Generally Completely

.1. Was the crewfindividual properly equipped to perform the job (ie., tools, knowledge, procedures)?

. ~

2. Were procedures used and adhered to as required?

3. Were crew members adequately shlled and knowledgeable to perform the job  ?

4. Were safe work practices followed 2

5. Are workers adhering to the radiological work requirements 2

6. Was time used eQ'ectively?

7. Was good housekeeping practiced 2

8. Did crew function as a team to complete the job?

9. Was the crew able to make appropriate adjustments to new conditions when necessary 2

10. Did the quality of work meet your expectations 2

11. Did the quantity of work meet your expectations 2

12. Were you satisfied with the overall performance of the job and sequence of events 2

Good Practices Concerns:

Comments: 4 ltll Recommendations: