ML18228A256: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 37: Line 37:
Page  4, paragraph    3, line 6 "licensing" to "license" Page  4, paragraph    3, line 7 "24-25" to "26" 2, line 9 "judicata laches ] " to "judicata, laches]
Page  4, paragraph    3, line 6 "licensing" to "license" Page  4, paragraph    3, line 7 "24-25" to "26" 2, line 9 "judicata laches ] " to "judicata, laches]
                                                                     \
                                                                     \
                                                                                    "
Page 5, paragraph Page 6, paragraph      2, line 5 "should be subject" to "should not be subject" Page  6, paragraph    2, line 11 -- "by correct" to "by the correct" Page  6, footnote    1, .line 4 -- "licensed unit" to "licensed units"
Page 5, paragraph Page 6, paragraph      2, line 5 "should be subject" to "should not be subject" Page  6, paragraph    2, line 11 -- "by correct" to "by the correct" Page  6, footnote    1, .line 4 -- "licensed unit" to "licensed units"
,Page',    paragr'aph    2,'ine 1 "determines for SectionSection  105" to "determines that fox            103" Page  8, paragraph    1, line 8delete "of respose or presumption of satisfaction with prior antitrust review." Insert "are inapplicable to Section 104 licenses, because they have" Page  8, paragraph      2, line  9 "they do not. negate" to "subsections 105(a) and (b)    restrict"
,Page',    paragr'aph    2,'ine 1 "determines for SectionSection  105" to "determines that fox            103" Page  8, paragraph    1, line 8delete "of respose or presumption of satisfaction with prior antitrust review." Insert "are inapplicable to Section 104 licenses, because they have" Page  8, paragraph      2, line  9 "they do not. negate" to "subsections 105(a) and (b)    restrict"

Revision as of 18:10, 2 February 2020

Transmitting Supplemental Brief of Florida Cities & Florida Cities' Supplemental Brief, Corrected.
ML18228A256
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  
Issue date: 06/30/1977
From: Jablon R
Florida Cities, Spiegel & McDiarmid
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18228A256 (5)


Text

LAW OFFICES SPIEGEL 8v MCDI~WRiifID 2600 VIRGINIAAVENUE, N. W.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20037 TELEPHONE I202) 333.4SOO GEORGE SPIEGEL PETER K. MATT ROBERT C. MCDIARMID DANIEL J. GUTTMAN SANDRA J. STREBEL DAVID R. STRAVS ROBERT A. JABLON BONNIE S. BLAIR JAMES N. HORWOOD ALAN J. ROTH June 30, 1977 DAVID A. GIACALONE ROBERT HARLEY BEAR FRANCES E. FRANCIS DANIEL I. DAVIDSON JAMES CARL POLLOCK THOMAS N. McHVGH, JR.

Chief, Docketing and Service Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are the original and 22 copies of Errata to the "Supplemental Brief of Florida Cities" to be filed in NRC Docket Nos. 50-335A, 50-250A and 50-25 n behalf of the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority of the City of Fort Pierce, the Gainesville-Alachua County Regional Electric Water and Sewer Utilities,. the Lake Worth Utilities Authority, the Utilities Commission of New Smyrna Beach, the Orlando Utilities Commission, the Sebring Utilities Commission, and the Cities of Alachua, Bartow, Daytona Beach, Fort Meade, Key West, Mount Dora, Newberry, Quincy, St.. Cloud and Tallahassee, Florida and the Florida Municipal Utilities Association.

Also enclosed for the convenience of the Commission and the parties are copies of Florida Cities'upplemental Brief, corrected as indicated-in the Errata filed herewith.

Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Jablon Attorney for Florida Cities Enclosures cc: (w/encl.)

A All parties to this t

proceeding r

0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Florida Power & Light Company )

(St. Lucie Plant, Unit. No. 1 ) Docket No. 50-335A

)

Florida Power 6 Light Company )

(Turkey Point Plant, Unit Nos. ) Docket Nos. 50-250A 3 and 4) ) 50-251A ERRATA TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF FLORIDA CITIES Table of Authorities, first page insert an National Broadcastin

v. United States,

~Com 319 U. S. 190 (1943) 10 Page 3, line 5 -- "has" to "had" Page 3, paragraph 3, line 6 -- " (June 23, 1977) ." to " (June 22, 1977) ."

Page 3, footnote 3, line 1 "in Response" to "and Response" Page 4, paragraph 3, line 4 -- "statutes)," to "statute),"

Page 4, paragraph 3, line 6 "licensing" to "license" Page 4, paragraph 3, line 7 "24-25" to "26" 2, line 9 "judicata laches ] " to "judicata, laches]

\

Page 5, paragraph Page 6, paragraph 2, line 5 "should be subject" to "should not be subject" Page 6, paragraph 2, line 11 -- "by correct" to "by the correct" Page 6, footnote 1, .line 4 -- "licensed unit" to "licensed units"

,Page', paragr'aph 2,'ine 1 "determines for SectionSection 105" to "determines that fox 103" Page 8, paragraph 1, line 8delete "of respose or presumption of satisfaction with prior antitrust review." Insert "are inapplicable to Section 104 licenses, because they have" Page 8, paragraph 2, line 9 "they do not. negate" to "subsections 105(a) and (b) restrict"

Page 2 Page 8, paragraph 2, line 10 delete "as does Section 105(c)(2)."

Page 8, paragraph 3, line 1 -- "Unlike in South Texas" to "Unlike the licenses in South Texas" Page 9, paragraph 1, line 16 -- "Commission" to "Commission's" footnote, line 4 "in absence" to "in the absence" t

Page 10, Page ll, paragraph 1, line 7 -- "1272, affirmed" to 1272 (D.C.

Cir. 19 76), a ffirmed" Page ll, paragraph 2, line 5 "warranty" to "warranted" Page 16, footnote 1, line 2 -- "base load units," to " "base load" units" Page 16, paragraph 1, lines 1 & 2 -- "events, have limited gas and oil availability in Florida,"

to "events have limited gas and oil availability in Florida" Page 18, footnote 2, line 6 "design" to "designed" r

Page 18, footnote 2, line 15 --,"given opportunity" to "given the opportunity" Page 18, footnote 2, line 18 -- "units" to "unit" Page 19, paragraph 1, line ll --. "effect into" to "effect and to" Page 19, paragraph 1, line 12 "intended reference to the" to "intended to refer to" Page 20, footnote 1, line 1 -- "correlary" to "corollary" Respectf ully submitted, Robert A. Jablon Attorney for Florida Cities 30 June 1977, r

Law Offices of:

Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037 202-333-4500