ML19338B974: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.m ._ _ ... .. __ _ .. _ . _ | {{#Wiki_filter:.m ._ _ ... .. __ _ .. _ . _ | ||
,, ; . | ,, ; . | ||
_ . . _ . . _ . _ . . . . . ~ - _ | _ . . _ . . _ . _ . . . . . ~ - _ | ||
.-.......-.q _ _ . . . | .-.......-.q _ _ . . . | ||
- ~- | - ~- | ||
. _; | . _; | ||
^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*= | ^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*= | ||
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT i | |||
No. 73-1776 - September Term,19 77 e g-a | |||
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT | |||
-) | -) | ||
l 1 l | l 1 l | ||
| Line 46: | Line 34: | ||
1 i | 1 i | ||
- - N ' | - - N ' | ||
United States Atomic Energy Comission ' | United States Atomic Energy Comission ' | ||
?j ,j@ . | ?j ,j@ . | ||
| Line 59: | Line 46: | ||
Respondents ' | Respondents ' | ||
i ConsumersTower Company, 1 Intervenor ' | i ConsumersTower Company, 1 Intervenor ' | ||
~ | ~ | ||
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, ? | BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, ? | ||
-U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. l | -U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. l | ||
, .O .R .D .E. .R l | , .O .R .D .E. .R l | ||
.Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by . i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H , | .Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by . i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H , | ||
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. 1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, l and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of | reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. 1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, l and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of | ||
. construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is' | . construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is' | ||
[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als , | [9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als , | ||
FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT - | FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT - | ||
2 - - | 2 - - | ||
- No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e | |||
- No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 | |||
e | |||
. ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate | . ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate | ||
- is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. | - is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. | ||
Per Curiam For the Court: | |||
Per Curiam | |||
For the Court: | |||
e C.M/ | e C.M/ | ||
cao .. nsasa Clerk i' | |||
cao .. nsasa Clerk | |||
i' | |||
* Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d). , | * Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d). , | ||
; | ; | ||
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. | Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. | ||
l | l h | ||
1 l | |||
1 1 | |||
1 | |||
\ | \ | ||
; | ; | ||
e f | e f | ||
i O | i O | ||
l l | l l | ||
l 1 | |||
1 1 | 1 1 | ||
.. j . . ..--* - _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . .. | .. j . . ..--* - _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . .. | ||
l | l 9 . - . - .}} | ||
9 . - . - .}} | |||
Revision as of 13:14, 31 January 2020
| ML19338B974 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1977 |
| From: | Bazelon U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT |
| To: | Saginaw Intervenor |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338B972 | List: |
| References | |
| 73-1776, NUDOCS 8007291119 | |
| Download: ML19338B974 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.m ._ _ ... .. __ _ .. _ . _
,, ; .
_ . . _ . . _ . _ . . . . . ~ - _
.-.......-.q _ _ . . .
- ~-
. _;
^ #j hitch 5fafas Ecurf of AbpeaY'*=
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A CIRCUlT i No. 73-1776 - September Term,19 77 e g-a
-)
l 1 l Nelson Aeschliman, et al, g . %\ l l Petitioners -7 ' l
,cp
( 1 i
- - N '
United States Atomic Energy Comission '
?j ,j@ .
O and thited States of America, j
. c, A,y . /
Respondents .
* / wt Consumers Power Company, United States Court of Appeals for t:w DistM. cf cd=. bis che:lt Intervenor -
fil.ED 007271977 No. 73-1867 . Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group, GEORC-{AgFISHER ct al ., Petitioners v. i United States Atomic Energy Comission l and United States of America, < Respondents ' i ConsumersTower Company, 1 Intervenor '
~
BEIM E: Bazelen, Chief Judge; Fahy, Senior Circuit Judge and Justice *, ?
-U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas. l
, .O .R .D .E. .R l
.Upon consideration of petitioners' emergericy motion to enforce mandate, of their f motion for imediate and-expedited consideration thereof, of the responses filed by . i respondent Comission and by intervenor Consumers Power Company, and of petitioners' H ,
reply to the responses, and it app 6aring to the Court that it previously has refused to y stay the mandate and that it is _still in effect, and it further appearing that the L. 1 Comission should completely carry out this' Court's remand with all reasonable expedition, l and it further appearing that our mandate has not itself required a cessation of
. construction and that matter.is under consideration within the Commission, it is'
[9 E ni1221 $ 13I25 6 Durf Qf Spp2als , FOR THE OlSTRICT OF cot.UMGI A CIRCulT - 2 - -
- No. 73-1776, et at September Term,19.77 e
. ORDERED by the Court that petitioners' emergency motion to enforce mandate
- is denied, the Court noting that continuation of construction pending resolution of L the remanded issues is at the risk of intervenor Ccasumers Power Company. Per Curiam For the Court: e C.M/ cao .. nsasa Clerk i'
- Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 292(d). ,
;
Judge Justice did not participate in the foregoing order. l h 1 l 1 1
\
;
e f i O l l l 1 1 1
.. j . . ..--* - _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . ..
l 9 . - . - .}}