ML19340E987: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:O Wisconsin Electnc ne coumr 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI S3201 January 13, ,1981 | {{#Wiki_filter:O Wisconsin Electnc ne coumr 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI S3201 January 13, ,1981 | ||
~: | ~: | ||
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - 1' Washington, D. C. 20555 :; | Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - 1' Washington, D. C. 20555 :; | ||
Attention: Mr. William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch | Attention: Mr. William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch L | ||
L | |||
* Gentlemen: | * Gentlemen: | ||
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 64 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 | DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 64 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 l This is in response to your letter dated December 19, | ||
l This is in response to your letter dated December 19, | |||
! 1980 which again requested that we submit a second Class I I | ! 1980 which again requested that we submit a second Class I I | ||
license amendment approval fee for our Technical Specification Change Request and license amendments application dated r September 19, 1980. We still believe that the reasons discussed | license amendment approval fee for our Technical Specification Change Request and license amendments application dated r September 19, 1980. We still believe that the reasons discussed | ||
( in our Noven1ber 14 letter for opposing payment of a second | ( in our Noven1ber 14 letter for opposing payment of a second Class I fee are correct, particularly since the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 use a common Technical Specification document. Contrary to your statement, no additional admini-strative effort is required for checking and issuing the i Technical Specification pages for the second unit since only a single set of pages is issued for both units. Although a license amendment cover page is prepared for the second unit, there is no more effort required to prepare and review this cover page when both Class III and Class II application reviews l | ||
I are involved than if only one or the other review was involved. | |||
Class I fee are correct, particularly since the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 use a common Technical Specification document. Contrary to your statement, no additional admini- | |||
strative effort is required for checking and issuing the i Technical Specification pages for the second unit since only | |||
a single set of pages is issued for both units. Although a license amendment cover page is prepared for the second unit, there is no more effort required to prepare and review this cover page when both Class III and Class II application reviews | |||
Accordingly, we believe our amendment fee submittals in this matter are correct. | Accordingly, we believe our amendment fee submittals in this matter are correct. | ||
Very truly yours, | Very truly yours, r | ||
.A Executive Vice President l Sol Burstein y 008 | |||
r | |||
.A | |||
Executive Vice President l Sol Burstein y 008 | |||
.s Copy to NRC Resident Inspector /p sl o 12 co#/ /}} | .s Copy to NRC Resident Inspector /p sl o 12 co#/ /}} | ||
Revision as of 09:11, 31 January 2020
| ML19340E987 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 01/13/1981 |
| From: | Burstein S WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton, Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TAC-43031, TAC-43032, NUDOCS 8101160451 | |
| Download: ML19340E987 (2) | |
Text
O Wisconsin Electnc ne coumr 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI S3201 January 13, ,1981
~:
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - 1' Washington, D. C. 20555 :;
Attention: Mr. William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch L
- Gentlemen:
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 64 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 l This is in response to your letter dated December 19,
! 1980 which again requested that we submit a second Class I I
license amendment approval fee for our Technical Specification Change Request and license amendments application dated r September 19, 1980. We still believe that the reasons discussed
( in our Noven1ber 14 letter for opposing payment of a second Class I fee are correct, particularly since the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 use a common Technical Specification document. Contrary to your statement, no additional admini-strative effort is required for checking and issuing the i Technical Specification pages for the second unit since only a single set of pages is issued for both units. Although a license amendment cover page is prepared for the second unit, there is no more effort required to prepare and review this cover page when both Class III and Class II application reviews l
I are involved than if only one or the other review was involved.
Accordingly, we believe our amendment fee submittals in this matter are correct.
Very truly yours, r
.A Executive Vice President l Sol Burstein y 008
.s Copy to NRC Resident Inspector /p sl o 12 co#/ /