ML010810414: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:April 27, 2001 Mr. Ralph E. Beedle Senior Vice President Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006-3708 | ||
== | ==Dear Mr. Beedle:== | ||
Thank you for your letter of March 5, 2001, concerning the proposal presented in SECY-01-0009 to make certain revisions to the Reactor Safety Goal Policy Statement. The Commission has disapproved issuance of the revised policy statement at this time. | |||
In a Staff Requirements Memorandum, dated April 16, 2001, the staff was directed to consult with the Commission on a more significant revision to the policy statement in the future, after further progress has been made on the agencys various risk-informed initiatives. When the policy statement is revisited, the Commission will continue to ensure that interested stakeholders are involved in the revision process. | |||
Again, thank you for your comments. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Richard A. Meserve}} | |||
Latest revision as of 04:56, 24 November 2019
| ML010810414 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/27/2001 |
| From: | Meserve R NRC/OCM/RAM |
| To: | Ralph Beedle Nuclear Energy Institute |
| References | |
| G20010102 CORR-01-0055 | |
| Download: ML010810414 (1) | |
Text
April 27, 2001 Mr. Ralph E. Beedle Senior Vice President Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006-3708
Dear Mr. Beedle:
Thank you for your letter of March 5, 2001, concerning the proposal presented in SECY-01-0009 to make certain revisions to the Reactor Safety Goal Policy Statement. The Commission has disapproved issuance of the revised policy statement at this time.
In a Staff Requirements Memorandum, dated April 16, 2001, the staff was directed to consult with the Commission on a more significant revision to the policy statement in the future, after further progress has been made on the agencys various risk-informed initiatives. When the policy statement is revisited, the Commission will continue to ensure that interested stakeholders are involved in the revision process.
Again, thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Richard A. Meserve