NRC-2013-0037, Comment (3) of Brian Doliber Supporting on License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[NRC-2013-0037, Comment (9) of Tim Anderson on Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant]]
| number = ML14281A260
| issue date = 09/22/2014
| title = Comment (3) of Brian Doliber Supporting on License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement
| author name = Doliber B
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ADM/DAS/RADB
| docket = 05000327, 05000328
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = 79FR46878 00003, NRC-2013-0037
| document type = General FR Notice Comment Letter type:NRC
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Draft Supplement
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 As of: October 03, 2014 Received: September 22, 2014 PUBLICPUBLC        SUBMISSION S      BMISIONTracking                            Status: Pending-Post No. ljy-8eir-uw~s Comments Due: September 29,2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0037 Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Comment On: NRC-2013-0037-0023 License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2; Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement g 7//Y'2-1? / el Document: NRC-2013-0037-DRAFT-0020 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-18966 Submitter Information Name: Brian Doliber General Comment I support the proposed federal action for license renewal of SQN. None of the alternative methods are able to meet the power needs of the community while reducing ecological impacts. It seems that adequate limitations are in place and repairs, refurbishments and improvements have been made to the SQN, and should continue to be done in the future. Plant improvements are expected and severe accident mitigation alternatives have been reviewed and addressed. Water temperature related risks and effects should be continued to be evaluated and closely monitored.
                                                                                        -7                          MI IA
                                                                                        ý77 0              00 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add=                      C-https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481887cbc&for...              10/03/2014}}

Revision as of 11:54, 17 November 2019