ML090721095: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 12, 2009  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
                                  NUC LE AR RE G UL AT O RY C O M M I S S I O N
James R. Douet Vice President Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756  
                                                      R E GI ON I V
Port Gibson, MS 39150
                                          612 EAST LAMAR BLVD , SU I TE 400
SUBJECT: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000416/2009301
                                          AR LI N GTON , TEXAS 76011-4125
                                                March 12, 2009
Dear Mr. Douet:  
James R. Douet
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager, Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and other members of your staff.  
Vice President Operations
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.  
Entergy Operations, Inc.
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC  
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125
P.O. Box 756
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 2 -
Port Gibson, MS 39150
  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
SUBJECT:       GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT
      Sincerely, 
                05000416/2009301
Dear Mr. Douet:
        /RA/      BWStapleton for      Ryan E. Lantz, Chief Operations Branch      Division of Reactor Safety
On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination
at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which
were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and
other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator
licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR
Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The
NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC
Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into
your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a
response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the
NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.


  Docket:   50-416 License: NPF-29  
Entergy Operations, Inc.                        -2-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
                                              BWStapleton for
                                              Ryan E. Lantz, Chief
                                              Operations Branch
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-416
License: NPF-29
Enclosure:
NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301
  w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/Enclosure:
Senior Vice President
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Senior Vice President and COO
Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Vice President, Oversight
Entergy Services, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995


  Enclosure: NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301    w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
Entergy Operations, Inc.                -3-
Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch
cc w/Enclosure: Senior Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Environmental Compliance and
  Enforcement Division
Mississippi Department of
  Environmental Quality
P. O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS 39289-0385
President
Claiborne County
Board of Supervisors
510 Market Street
Port Gibson, MS 39150
Senior Manager
Nuclear Safety & Licensing
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Manager, Licensing
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
P. . Box 756
Port Gibson, MS 39150
Attorney General
Department of Justice
State of Louisiana
P. O. Box 94005
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005
Office of the Governor
State of Mississippi
P.O. Box 139
Jackson, MS 39205
Attorney General
Assistant Attorney General
State of Mississippi
P. O. Box 220
Jackson, MS 39205


Senior Vice President and COO Entergy Operations, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995  
Entergy Operations, Inc.                 -4-
State Health Officer
State Health Board
P. O. Box 1700
Jackson, MS 39215
Associate General Counsel
Entergy Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 31995
Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality
Radiological Emergency Planning and
  Response Division
P. O. Box 4312
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312


Vice President, Oversight Entergy Services, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Entergy Operations, Inc.                           -5-
 
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 3 -
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
  Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch Environmental Compliance and    Enforcement Division
Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)
Mississippi Department of    Environmental Quality P. O. Box 10385 Jackson, MS  39289-0385
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
President Claiborne County Board of Supervisors 510 Market Street Port Gibson, MS 39150
DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)
Senior Manager
DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Nuclear Safety & Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995
Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)
Manager, Licensing Entergy Operations, Inc. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P. . Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150
Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)
GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
ML
SUNSI Rev Compl.         Yes      No  ADAMS        Yes No      Reviewer Initials  GWA
Publicly Avail          Yes      No  Sensitive      Yes No    Sens. Type Initials GWA
OE:OB            OE:OB            SOE:OB          SOE:OB        C:PBC          C:OB
GWApger          SHedger          BTLarson        SGarchow      GMiller        RELantz
/RA/              /RA/            /RA/            /RA/          /RA/          /RA/
03/11/09          03/11/09        03/11/09        03/11/09      03/11/09        03/12/09
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                    T=Telephone      E=E-mail      F=Fax


Attorney General Department of Justice State of Louisiana P. O. Box 94005
                U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Baton Rouge, LA  70804-9005 
                                  REGION IV
Office of the Governor State of Mississippi P.O. Box 139
Docket:      50-416
Jackson, MS  39205
Licenses:    NPF-29
Attorney General Assistant Attorney General State of Mississippi P. O. Box 220 Jackson, MS  39205  
Report No.: 05000416/2009301
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 4 -
Licensee:    Entergy Operations, Inc.
  State Health Officer State Health Board P. O. Box 1700
Facility:    Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Jackson, MS  39215 
            Waterloo Road
Associate General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995
Location:
Jackson, MS  39286-1995
            Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150
Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality Radiological Emergency Planning and    Response Division P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA  70821-4312 
Dates:      March 3 - 10, 2009
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 5 -
Inspectors: Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)
  Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)  
            Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov) GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
            Brian Larson (Examiner)
            Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)
Approved By: Ryan E. Lantz
                                        -1-                            Enclosure


   
                                    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
   
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator
   
Licensing Examination Report.
   
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two
ML SUNSI Rev Compl. Yes  No ADAMS  Yes  No Reviewer Initials GWA Publicly Avail  Yes  No Sensitive  Yes  No Sens. Type Initials GWA OE:OB OE:OB SOE:OB SOE:OB C:PBC  C:OB GWApger SHedger BTLarson SGarchow GMiller  RELantz
applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator
/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA//RA//RA/ 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09  03/12/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY  T=Telephone          E=E-mail        F=Fax 
licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.
  - 1 - Enclosure
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written
REGION IV
examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners
Docket: 50-416 Licenses: NPF-29
administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.
Report No.: 05000416/2009301
The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and
Licensee: Entergy Operations, Inc.
the appropriate licenses have been issued.
Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Location: Waterloo Road  Port Gibson, Mississippi  39150 Dates: March 3 - 10, 2009 Inspectors: Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner) Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction) Brian Larson (Examiner) Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction) Approved By: Ryan E. Lantz
A.     NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
     
        No findings of significance were identified.
 
B.      Licensee-Identified Violations
  - 2 - Enclosure SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
        A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the
        examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into
ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator
        the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking
Licensing Examination Report.  
        numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
                                                    -2-                                 Enclosure
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.
 
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing
                                        REPORT DETAILS
Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.  The written examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009.  NRC examiners administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.  
4.     OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. 
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
  .1    License Applications
A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
    a. Scope
  No findings of significance were identified.  
      NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant
  B. Licensee-Identified Violations
      satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the
  A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into the licensee's corrective action program.  This violation and its corrective action tracking numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
      license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject
  - 3 - Enclosure REPORT DETAILS
      applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-
4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
      job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
        4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
    b. Findings
  .1 License Applications
      No findings of significance were identified.
  a. Scope NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements.  Examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicant's qualifications.  This audit focused on the applicant's experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.  
.2    Examination Development
  b. Findings
    a. Scope
  No findings of significance were identified.
      NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the
.2 Examination Development
      operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to
 
      the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC
a. Scope  NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC
      examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the
examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the requirements in NUREG-1021.  
      requirements in NUREG-1021.
  b. Findings
    b. Findings
  NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the licensee.  The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination administration.
      NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the
NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did
      licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination
not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario "Applicant's Actions" portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors in identifying malfunctions were found.  The job performance measures were not validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.
      administration.
  - 4 - Enclosure  .3 Operator Knowledge and Performance
      NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did
  a. Scope  On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations  
      not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario
to all six applicants.  The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.  
      Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.
      in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not
  b. Findings
      validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A
  No findings of significance were identified.  
      contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks
All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be
      before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer
accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment. There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the licensee, dated March 9, 2009.
      effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.
  .4 Simulation Facility Performance
                                                    -3-                                  Enclosure
  a. Scope  The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration.
 
  b. Findings
.3    Operator Knowledge and Performance
  No findings of significance were identified.  
  a. Scope
      On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations
.5 Examination Security
      to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the
  a. Scope  The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during
      results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.
both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021.  Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
      The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to
  b. Findings
      all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.
  A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during
  b. Findings
examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede the NRC's regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the
      No findings of significance were identified.
following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test: 
      All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The
  - 5 - Enclosure
      final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be
* All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and  
      accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.
* Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.
      There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
      licensee, dated March 9, 2009.
   The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.
.4    Simulation Facility Performance
Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.
  a. Scope
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination  
      The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during
as proprietary.  
      examination validation and administration.
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
  b. Findings
  The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy, NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.
      No findings of significance were identified.
* 10CFR55.49 states in part:  "Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test, or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of the test or examination."  Contrary to the above, during scenario development in
.5    Examination Security
December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their
  a. Scope
corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388.  Because the paperwork was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed; and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of
      The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during
the examination had been compromised.  This is a Severity Level IV violation because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.
      both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance
      with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control
ATTACHMENT:  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
      were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
  A-1 Attachment SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
  b. Findings
  KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
      A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during
      examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation
      documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional
      enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede
      the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made
      based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the
      following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:
                                                  -4-                               Enclosure
 
        *  All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and
        *  Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite
            validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
    The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.
    Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on
    March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,
    Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.
    The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination
    as proprietary.
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
    The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation
    of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,
    NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.
          *   10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall
              not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,
              or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is
              considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for
              detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of
              the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in
              December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario
              paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios
              was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during
              onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee
              immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their
              corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork
              was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could
              not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;
              and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC
              Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of
              the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation
              because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was
              discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the
              examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
                                                  -5-                                 Enclosure
 
                              SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
                                KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
Licensee Personnel
Randy Douet, Site Vice President
Randy Douet, Site Vice President
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager Jim Caery, Training Manager Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial  
Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager
Rita Jackson, Licensing Will Ryder, Exam Team Kyle Grillis, Exam Team
Jim Caery, Training Manager
 
Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training
Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification
Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial
Rita Jackson, Licensing
Will Ryder, Exam Team
Kyle Grillis, Exam Team
NRC Personnel
NRC Personnel
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector  
Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector
  ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED  
                          ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS
Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST
Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS
                                            A-1                    Attachment
}}
}}

Revision as of 08:08, 14 November 2019

Er 05000416-09-301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report
ML090721095
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2009
From: Ryan Lantz
Operations Branch IV
To: Douet J
Entergy Operations
References
ER-09-301 50-416/09-301
Download: ML090721095 (11)


See also: IR 05000416/2009301

Text

UNITED STATES

NUC LE AR RE G UL AT O RY C O M M I S S I O N

R E GI ON I V

612 EAST LAMAR BLVD , SU I TE 400

AR LI N GTON , TEXAS 76011-4125

March 12, 2009

James R. Douet

Vice President Operations

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P.O. Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

SUBJECT: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT

05000416/2009301

Dear Mr. Douet:

On March 10, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination

at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which

were discussed on March 5, 2009, with yourself, Messrs. Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager,

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager for Training, Jim Caery, Training Manager, and

other members of your staff.

The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses. The written examinations and operating tests were developed using NUREG-1021,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.

The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A licensee-identified Severity Level IV violation is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. The

NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC

Enforcement Policy because it is a Severity Level IV violation and because it is entered into

your corrective action program. If you contest this non-cited violation, you should provide a

response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Region IV, 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the

NRC Resident Inspector at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

Entergy Operations, Inc. -2-

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

BWStapleton for

Ryan E. Lantz, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-416

License: NPF-29

Enclosure:

NRC Examination Report 05000416/2009301

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/Enclosure:

Senior Vice President

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Senior Vice President and COO

Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Vice President, Oversight

Entergy Services, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Entergy Operations, Inc. -3-

Chief, Energy and Transportation Branch

Environmental Compliance and

Enforcement Division

Mississippi Department of

Environmental Quality

P. O. Box 10385

Jackson, MS 39289-0385

President

Claiborne County

Board of Supervisors

510 Market Street

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Senior Manager

Nuclear Safety & Licensing

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Manager, Licensing

Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

P. . Box 756

Port Gibson, MS 39150

Attorney General

Department of Justice

State of Louisiana

P. O. Box 94005

Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005

Office of the Governor

State of Mississippi

P.O. Box 139

Jackson, MS 39205

Attorney General

Assistant Attorney General

State of Mississippi

P. O. Box 220

Jackson, MS 39205

Entergy Operations, Inc. -4-

State Health Officer

State Health Board

P. O. Box 1700

Jackson, MS 39215

Associate General Counsel

Entergy Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 31995

Jackson, MS 39286-1995

Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality

Radiological Emergency Planning and

Response Division

P. O. Box 4312

Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312

Entergy Operations, Inc. -5-

Electronic distribution by RIV:

Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)

Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)

DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov)

DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)

DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov)

DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)

Senior Resident Inspector Rich.Smith@nrc.gov)

Resident Inspector (Andy.Barrett@nrc.gov)

Branch Chief, DRP/C (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)

Senior Project Engineer, DRP/C (Wayne.Walker@nrc.gov)

GG Site Secretary (Nancy.Spivey@nrc.gov)

Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)

Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov)

RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)

ML

SUNSI Rev Compl. Yes No ADAMS Yes No Reviewer Initials GWA

Publicly Avail Yes No Sensitive Yes No Sens. Type Initials GWA

OE:OB OE:OB SOE:OB SOE:OB C:PBC C:OB

GWApger SHedger BTLarson SGarchow GMiller RELantz

/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/

03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/11/09 03/12/09

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket: 50-416

Licenses: NPF-29

Report No.: 05000416/2009301

Licensee: Entergy Operations, Inc.

Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

Waterloo Road

Location:

Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150

Dates: March 3 - 10, 2009

Inspectors: Steve Garchow (Chief Examiner)

Gabriel Apger (Examiner, Chief Examiner Under Instruction)

Brian Larson (Examiner)

Sean Hedger (Examiner Under Instruction)

Approved By: Ryan E. Lantz

-1- Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER05000416/2009301; March 3-10, 2009; Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; Initial Operator

Licensing Examination Report.

NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, two

applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator

licenses at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing

Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written

examinations were administered by the licensee on March 9, 2009. NRC examiners

administered the operating tests on March 3 - 5, 2009.

The examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and

the appropriate licenses have been issued.

A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

B. Licensee-Identified Violations

A licensee identified Severity Level IV non-cited violation has been reviewed by the

examiners. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee have been entered into

the licensees corrective action program. This violation and its corrective action tracking

numbers are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.

-2- Enclosure

REPORT DETAILS

4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)

.1 License Applications

a. Scope

NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant

satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. Examiners also audited three of the

license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject

applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-

job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2 Examination Development

a. Scope

NRC examiners developed the outlines, written examinations and portions of the

operating tests. The NRC staff submitted the operating test outlines and test material to

the licensee to validate and finalize for submittal as draft operating tests. NRC

examiners reviewed the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee against the

requirements in NUREG-1021.

b. Findings

NRC examiners provided draft examination and post-validation comments to the

licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination

administration.

NRC examiners determined that the draft operating tests submitted by the licensee did

not meet the requirements of NUREG-1021. Specifically, the simulator scenario

Applicants Actions portion of the Form ES-D-2 did not contain sufficient detail. Errors

in identifying malfunctions were found. The job performance measures were not

validated, and they contained numerous technical, formatting and grammatical errors. A

contributing factor is the licensee replaced the operating test developer two weeks

before on-site validation, and had no process in place to ensure the developer

effectively implemented the requirements of NUREG-1021.

-3- Enclosure

.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance

a. Scope

On March 9, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations

to all six applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the

results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on March 10, 2009.

The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to

all applicants on March 3 - 5, 2009.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test. The

final written examinations, operating tests and post-examination analysis can be

accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment.

There were no post-examination comments as indicated in a letter received from the

licensee, dated March 9, 2009.

.4 Simulation Facility Performance

a. Scope

The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during

examination validation and administration.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.5 Examination Security

a. Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed examination security for examination development during

both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance

with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control

were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.

b. Findings

A compromise of the simulator scenario portion of the operating test occurred during

examination development that resulted in the licensee-identified non-cited violation

documented in section 4OA7 of this report. The finding is being treated under traditional

enforcement because the violation, if not found or corrected, had the potential to impede

the NRCs regulatory function. Specifically, licensing decisions could have been made

based on an invalid and compromised examination. To ensure a valid examination, the

following changes were made to the simulator scenario portion of the operating test:

-4- Enclosure

  • All four scenarios were removed from the examination, and
  • Two new scenarios were developed by the NRC and the facility during the onsite

validation week. There was no overlap with any of the removed scenarios.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

The chief examiner presented the preliminary examination results to Mr. James R.

Douet and members of his staff on March 5, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on

March 11, 2009 between Messrs. Gabriel Apger, Examiner, and Bruce Bryant,

Operations Training Superintendant, Initial.

The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination

as proprietary.

4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations

The following Severity Level IV violation was identified by the licensee and is a violation

of NRC requirements that meets the criteria of Section VI of the Enforcement Policy,

NUREG 1600, for being dispositioned as a Non-Cited Violation.

  • 10CFR55.49 states in part: Applicants, licensees, and facility licensees shall

not engage in any activity that compromises the integrity of any application, test,

or examination required by this part. The integrity of a test or examination is

considered compromised if any activity, regardless of intent, affected, or, but for

detection, would have affected the equitable and consistent administration of

the test or examination. Contrary to the above, during scenario development in

December of 2008, the facility licensee left unsecured examination scenario

paperwork on the simulator printer. The paperwork for one of the four scenarios

was discovered by a facility licensee contractor on January 27, 2009 during

onsite validation with the NRC examination team. The facility licensee

immediately reported this to the NRC chief examiner and entered this into their

corrective action program under CR-CGN-2009-00388. Because the paperwork

was left on the printer for approximately one month; the facility licensee could

not definitively determine that the other three scenarios had not been printed;

and applicants were inside the simulator within eyesight of the printer, the NRC

Chief Examiner determined that the integrity of the simulator scenario portion of

the examination had been compromised. This is a Severity Level IV violation

because it was a unintentional compromise of the examination, it was

discovered and reported by the licensee, and the compromised portion of the

examination was replaced prior to making licensing decisions.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

-5- Enclosure

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

Randy Douet, Site Vice President

Jeremy Browning, Plant Manager

Jim Caery, Training Manager

Ernest Mathes, Assistant Operations Manager, Training

Charles Roberts, Operations Training Superintendant, Requalification

Bruce Bryant, Operations Training Superintendant, Initial

Rita Jackson, Licensing

Will Ryder, Exam Team

Kyle Grillis, Exam Team

NRC Personnel

Richard Smith, Senior Resident Inspector

ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED

Accession No. ML090700248 - FINAL WRITTEN EXAMS

Accession No. ML090700228 - FINAL OP TEST

Accession No. ML090700256 - POST EXAM COMMENTS-ANALYSIS

A-1 Attachment