ML100990086

FOIA/PA-2010-0149 - Resp 1 - Final

ML100990086
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/07/2010
From:	Sealing D NRC/OIS/IRSD
To:	Butler J Nuclear Energy Institute
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0149
Download: ML100990086 (4)

Text

NRC FORM 464 Part I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOIAIPA RESPONSE NUMBER (6-1998) -

R~j

- 2010-0149 1 00 .RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF

- INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) / PRIVACY RESPONSE 10 ACT (PA)REQUEST TYPE REQUESTER DATE John Butler APR - 7 2010 PART I. -- INFORMATION RELEASED No additional agency records subject to the request have been located.

FJ Requested records are available through another public distribution program. S ee Comments section.

1 APPENDICES Agency records subject to the request that are identified in the listed appendi ces are already available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room.

SAPPENDICES Agency records subject to the request that are identified in the listed appendi ces are being made available for A,B public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room.

Enclosed is information on how you may obtain access to and the charges for cop ying records located at the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738.

=

APPENDICES Agency records subject to the request are enclosed.

F-] Records subject to the request that contain information originated by or of int erest to another Federal agency have been referred to that agency (see comments section) for a disclosure determination a nd direct response to you.

We are continuing to process your request.

E See Comments.

PART L.A - FEES AMOUNT* Z You will be billed by NRC for the amount listed. None. Minimum fee threshold not met.

$ F-- You will receive a refund for the amount listed. Fees waived.

See comments for details PART I.B -- INFORMATION NOT LOCATED OR WITHHELD FROM DISCLOSURE

[] No agency records subject to the request have been located.

B* Certain information in the requested records'is being withheld from disclosure pursuant to the exemptions described in and for the reasons stated in Part 11.

F[1 This determination may be appealed within 30 days by writing to the FOIA/PA Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Clearly state on the envelope and in the letter tha t it is a "FOIA/PA Appeal."

PART I.C COMMENTS (Use attached Comments continuation vaqe if required)

The actual fees for processing your request are:

2 hrs. professional review @ $56.36 per hr. = $112.72 Total = $112.72 (Payment Received)

SIGNATAE -FREEDO MOFNFOlMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT OFFICER Sealq NRC FORM 464 Part 1 (16-1998) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER This form was designed using InForms

A FOIA-2010-0149 APPENDIX A RECORDS BEING RELEASED IN THEIR ENTIRETY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION/(PAGE COUNT)

1. 5/16/04 Management Directive 10.159 (37 pages)

2. 10/6/08 Differing Professional Opinion, DPO-2008-001 (9 pages)

3. 10/6/08 E-Mail from Pedersen to Borchardt, Notification of New DPO (1 page)

4. 10/6/08 E-Mail from Pedersen to Architzel, Acceptance of DPO (1 page)

5. 10/16/08 Memo to Leeds from Pedersen, Differing Professional Opinion Involving Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (13 pages)

6. 11/4/08 Memo to Bailey et al., from Leeds, Ad Hoc Review Panel -

Differing Professional Opinion Concerning Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (4 pages)

7. 5/27/09 Memo to Architzel from Leeds, Differing Professional Opinion Decision Concerning Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (6 pages)

8. 6/11/09 E-Mail from Architzel to Pedersen, DPO Decision; Next Steps (1 page)

9. 6/15/09 E-Mail from Carpenter to Pedersen, DPO Decision; Next Steps (3 pages)

10. 6/23/09 Differing Professional Opinion - Appeal, DPO-2008-001 (5 pages)

11. 6/25/09 Memo to Leeds from Pedersen, Differing Professional Opinion Involving Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-1 91' (DPO-2008-001) (5 pages)

12. 6/26/09 Memo to Ruland from Leeds, Taskings as a Result of Differing Professional Opinion Decision Concerning Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-1 91 (DPO-2008-001) (9 pages)

13. 7/9/09 Memo to Borchardt from Leeds, Statement of Views Regarding Appeal of Differing Professional Opinion Concerning Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) Appeal (1 page)

14. 7/15/09 Memo to Borchardt from Pedersen, Differing Professional Opinion Involving Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-1 91 (DPO-2008-001) (3 pages)

15. 7/20/09 Memo to Ruland from Leeds, Taskings as a Result of Differing Professional Opinion Decision Concerning Closure Process For Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (2 pages)

16. 8/4/09 Memo to Scott from Golla, Summary of June 23, 2009, Public Meeting with the Pressurized Water Reactor Owner's Group (PWROG), Licensees, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)

To Discuss the Resolution of Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-1 91 (35 pages)

17. 11/20/09 Memo to Architzel from Borchardt, Decision on Differing Professional Opinion Appeal Concerning Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (12 pages)

18. 3/9/10 E-Mail from Architzel to Pedersen, Request Public Release Of DPV Concerning Closure Process for GSI-191 file documents (4 pages)

19. 3/19/09 Memo to Leeds from Bailey et al, Differing Professional Opinion Panel Report Concerning Closure Process for Generic Safety Issue-191 (DPO-2008-001) (12 pages)

20. Undated DPO Appeal Process Checklist (3 pages)

21. Undated Executive Summary (12 pages) .

22. Undated OEDO Desk Guide for Differing Professional Opinions (DPO)

Appeals (5 pages)

FOIA-2010-0149 APPENDIX B RECORDS WITHHELD IN PART NO. DATE DESCRIPTION/(PAGE COUNT)

1. 6/12/09 E-Mail from Carpenter to Leeds, DPO Decision: Next Step (2 pages) PORTIONS OUTSIDE SCOPE