ML102100501: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:----Oms'" Public Power District 444 South 16 th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 July 29, 2010 LlC-10-0058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Attn: Document Control Washington, DC
{{#Wiki_filter:-- - -
: 1. Docket No. 50-285 Docket No. 72-054 Fort Calhoun Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 10 CFR 72.212 Report, dated July 21,2006 Letter from OPPD (J. L. McManis) to NRC (Document Control Desk), "Fort Calhoun Station Unit No.1, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Insta l lation (ISFSI) Cask Registration," dated August 11, 2006 06-0093) (ML062260095)
Oms'" Public Power District 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 July 29, 2010 LlC-10-0058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No.1, 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports for July 21,2006, through July 22, 2010 On July 21, 2006, the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) approved Revision 0 of the 10 CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report (Reference
: 3) and on July 29, 2006, the first storage of spent fuel under the general license occurred (Reference 4). 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) requires each licensee and certificate holder to submit a report conta.ining a brief description of any changes, tests, and experiments, including a summary of the evaluation of each at intervals not to exceed 24 mOl1ths. However, due to all oversight in capturing the 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) reporting requirement in FCS procedures and the FCS commitment tracking system, the required reports were not submitted at the proper time. This i ssue has been entered into the FCS corrective action program (Condition Report 2010-2528).
Thus far, OPPD (the I'icensee), has not performed any changes, tests, or experiments that resu'lted in a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation.
Nevertheless, to comply with the reporting requirement of 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2), two 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports Employment with Equal Opportunity U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L I C-1 0-0058 Page 2 are attached.
The first report encompasses the period of July 21, 2006, through July 21, 2008. The second report encompasses the period of July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010. This reporting requirement is now tracked by the FCS commitment tracking system and procedure revisions are in process. No commitments to the NRC are made in this letter. If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Teddy Hutchinson at (402) 7380. Sincerely, :i o dell Division Manager-Nuclear Performance Improvement
& Support Attachments:
: 1. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21, 2006, through July 21,2008 2. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010 JRGIT JH/mle 


Attachment Page 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21,2006, through July 21,2008 
==References:==
: 1.          Docket No. 50-285
: 2. Docket No. 72-054
: 3. Fort Calhoun Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 10 CFR 72.212 Report, dated July 21,2006
: 4. Letter from OPPD (J. L. McManis) to NRC (Document Control Desk),
                                "Fort Calhoun Station Unit No.1, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration," dated August 11, 2006 (LlC 06-0093) (ML062260095)


Attachment Page There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.
==SUBJECT:==
L I C-1 Attachment Page 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22,2008, through July 22,2010 
Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No.1, 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports for July 21,2006, through July 22, 2010 On July 21, 2006, the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) approved Revision 0 of the 10 CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report (Reference 3) and on July 29, 2006, the first storage of spent fuel under the general license occurred (Reference 4).
10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) requires each licensee and certificate holder to submit a report conta.ining a brief description of any changes, tests, and experiments, including a summary of the evaluation of each at intervals not to exceed 24 mOl1ths.
However, due to all oversight in capturing the 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) reporting requirement in FCS procedures and the FCS commitment tracking system, the required reports were not submitted at the proper time. This issue has been entered into the FCS corrective action program (Condition Report 2010-2528).
Thus far, OPPD (the I'icensee), has not performed any changes, tests, or experiments that resu'lted in a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation. Nevertheless, to comply with the reporting requirement of 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2), two 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports Employment with Equal Opportunity


Attachment Page There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.}}
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L IC-1 0-0058 Page 2 are attached. The first report encompasses the period of July 21, 2006, through July 21, 2008. The second report encompasses the period of July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010.
This reporting requirement is now tracked by the FCS commitment tracking system and procedure revisions are in process.
No commitments to the NRC are made in this letter.
If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Teddy Hutchinson at (402) 533 7380.
Sincerely,
:iodell Division Manager-Nuclear Performance Improvement & Support Attachments:
: 1. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21, 2006, through July 21,2008
: 2. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010 JRGITJH/mle
 
L1C-10-0058 Page 1 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21,2006, through July 21,2008
 
LlC-10-0058 Page 2 There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.
 
LIC-1 0-0058 Page 1 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22,2008, through July 22,2010
 
LlC-10-0058 Page 2 There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.}}

Revision as of 15:28, 13 November 2019

(Fcs), Unit 1, 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports for July 21,2006, Through July 22, 2010
ML102100501
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun  Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/2010
From: Goodell J
Omaha Public Power District
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
LlC-10-0058
Download: ML102100501 (6)
v • d • e


Text

-- - -

Oms'" Public Power District 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 July 29, 2010 LlC-10-0058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

References:

1. Docket No. 50-285
2. Docket No.72-054
3. Fort Calhoun Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 10 CFR 72.212 Report, dated July 21,2006
4. Letter from OPPD (J. L. McManis) to NRC (Document Control Desk),

"Fort Calhoun Station Unit No.1, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Cask Registration," dated August 11, 2006 (LlC 06-0093) (ML062260095)

SUBJECT:

Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No.1, 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports for July 21,2006, through July 22, 2010 On July 21, 2006, the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) approved Revision 0 of the 10 CFR 72.212 Evaluation Report (Reference 3) and on July 29, 2006, the first storage of spent fuel under the general license occurred (Reference 4).

10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) requires each licensee and certificate holder to submit a report conta.ining a brief description of any changes, tests, and experiments, including a summary of the evaluation of each at intervals not to exceed 24 mOl1ths.

However, due to all oversight in capturing the 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2) reporting requirement in FCS procedures and the FCS commitment tracking system, the required reports were not submitted at the proper time. This issue has been entered into the FCS corrective action program (Condition Report 2010-2528).

Thus far, OPPD (the I'icensee), has not performed any changes, tests, or experiments that resu'lted in a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation. Nevertheless, to comply with the reporting requirement of 10 CFR 72.48(d)(2), two 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Reports Employment with Equal Opportunity

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L IC-1 0-0058 Page 2 are attached. The first report encompasses the period of July 21, 2006, through July 21, 2008. The second report encompasses the period of July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010.

This reporting requirement is now tracked by the FCS commitment tracking system and procedure revisions are in process.

No commitments to the NRC are made in this letter.

If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Teddy Hutchinson at (402) 533 7380.

Sincerely,

iodell Division Manager-Nuclear Performance Improvement & Support Attachments:
1. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21, 2006, through July 21,2008
2. 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22, 2008, through July 22,2010 JRGITJH/mle

L1C-10-0058 Page 1 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 21,2006, through July 21,2008

LlC-10-0058 Page 2 There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.

LIC-1 0-0058 Page 1 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluation Summary Report for July 22,2008, through July 22,2010

LlC-10-0058 Page 2 There were no changes, tests, or experiments performed under 10 CFR 72.48 during this 24-month period.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102100501&oldid=2130060"