ML12024A535: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:tI.Bowman, Gregor From: Bowman, Gregory -Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:25 AM To: Shea, Pamela .-5 /", | {{#Wiki_filter:tI. | ||
Bowman, Gregor From: Bowman, Gregory - | |||
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:25 AM To: Shea, Pamela .- 5 /", | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Extension Request WITS 2010001 19/SECY-2010-0166 | RE: Extension Request WITS 2010001 19/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)Outside of Scope From: Shea, Pamela Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:23 AM To: Bowman, Gregory; ExtensionRequest, EDO | Outside of Scope From: Shea, Pamela Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:23 AM To: Bowman, Gregory; ExtensionRequest, EDO | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SFCY-2010-0166 | RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SFCY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)Good Morning Greg, SECY is waiting for one Commission office to respond to the extension. | Good Morning Greg, SECY is waiting for one Commission office to respond to the extension. As soon as I hear back, I will let you | ||
As soon as I hear back, I will let you",IioW.rjrk. you, From: Bowman, Gregory Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:07 AM To: Shea, Pamela | ",IioW. | ||
rjrk. you, From: Bowman, Gregory Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:07 AM To: Shea, Pamela | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 | FW: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)Ouside of Scope From: ExtensionRequest, EDO Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:59 AM To: RidsResPmdaMail Resource; Johnson, Kevin Cc: Lui, Christiana; Coe, Doug; Uhle, Jennifer; Gibson, Kathy; Armstrong, Kenneth; Santiago, Patricia; Hudson, Daniel;Bowman, Gregory; Sheron, Brian; Lyons, James; ExtensionRequest, EDO | Ouside of Scope From: ExtensionRequest, EDO Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:59 AM To: RidsResPmdaMail Resource; Johnson, Kevin Cc: Lui, Christiana; Coe, Doug; Uhle, Jennifer; Gibson, Kathy; Armstrong, Kenneth; Santiago, Patricia; Hudson, Daniel; Bowman, Gregory; Sheron, Brian; Lyons, James; ExtensionRequest, EDO | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 | RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)Kevin, Outside of Scope Fnanks.Denise mb~st~fl | Kevin, "I Outside of Scope Fnanks. | ||
Denise mb~st~fl r Fe dorwe eesww | |||
~w~don~28 FOIWmPA al g AL-k | |||
From: RidsResPmdaMail Resource Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1.1:42 AM To: ExtensionRequest, EDO Cc: Lui, Christiana; Coe, Doug; Uhle, Jennifer; Gibson, Kathy; Armstrong, Kenneth; Santiago, Patricia; Hudson, Daniel; Bowman, Gregory; Sheron, Brian; Lyons, James | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 | Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)Task Number: WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 | Task Number: WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs) | ||
-Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs)Current EDO Due Date: January 31, 2011 (Current SECY Due Date: February 7, 2011)Requested Due Date to EDO: June 30, 2011 (Requested Due Date to SECY: July 7, 2011)Justification for andlor circumstances as to why extension Is necessary: | Current EDO Due Date: | ||
On February 18, 2010, during the Annual Commission Briefing on Research Programs, Performance, and Future Plans, RES briefed the Commission on the need for conducting a new comprehensive site Level 3 Pr~babilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). On March 19, 2010, the Commission issued staff requirements memorandum (SRM) M100218 (ML100780578), which directed the staff to: (1) continue internal coordination efforts and engage external stakeholders in formulating a plan and scope for future Level 3 PRAs, and (2)provide the Commission with various options for proceeding which include costs and perspectives on future uses. The SECY suspense date is February 7, 2011.On September 27, 2010, the staff requested an extension of the due date for submitting the Commission paper that will provide both the results of the completed State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA)pilot study and recommendations for if and how to proceed with additional analyses for other plant and containment configurations. | January 31, 2011 (Current SECY Due Date: February 7, 2011) | ||
The extension request was submitted to allow time to complete additional analyses, external outreach, and public review activities. | Requested Due Date to EDO: | ||
On September 29, 2010. OEDO approved an extension to June 30, 2011 for submission to OEDO, and requested SECY reset the due date to July 7, 2011.The latter request is still under consideration by SECY and the Commission. | June 30, 2011 (Requested Due Date to SECY: July 7, 2011) | ||
On October 5, 2010, the staff submitted a Commissioners' Assistants (CA) note (ML102780604) to notify the Commission of its plans for completing the SOARCA study as well as its belief that the results and reconmendations for proceeding with both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA should be integrated in a single policy paper to the Commission. | Justification for andlor circumstances as to why extension Is necessary: | ||
This CA note also informed the Commission of the staffs intent to submit an extension request to extend the due date for the Level 3 PRA Commission paper and provided justification for combining it with the SOARCA Commission paper.An important first step is to align the schedules for providing the Commission with recommendations for proceeding with SOARCA and Level 3 PRA activities. | On February 18, 2010, during the Annual Commission Briefing on Research Programs, Performance, and Future Plans, RES briefed the Commission on the need for conducting a new comprehensive site Level 3 Pr~babilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). On March 19, 2010, the Commission issued staff requirements memorandum (SRM) M100218 (ML100780578), which directed the staff to: (1) continue internal coordination efforts and engage external stakeholders in formulating a plan and scope for future Level 3 PRAs, and (2) provide the Commission with various options for proceeding which include costs and perspectives on future uses. The SECY suspense date is February 7, 2011. | ||
This will facilitate informed Commission policy on whether and how to proceed with the next steps for either or both studies. The staff is therefore requesting an extension of the OEDO due date for submitting the Level 3 PRA Commission paper to June 30, 2011 and a reset of the SECY due date to July 7. 2011 to coincide with the SOARCA Commission paper. Based on the need to align with the new SOARCA schedule, the resetting of the SECY due date is justified by criteria #4 in OEDO Procedure | On September 27, 2010, the staff requested an extension of the due date for submitting the Commission paper that will provide both the results of the completed State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) pilot study and recommendations for if and how to proceed with additional analyses for other plant and containment configurations. The extension request was submitted to allow time to complete additional analyses, external outreach, and public review activities. On September 29, 2010. OEDO approved an extension to June 30, 2011 for submission to OEDO, and requested SECY reset the due date to July 7, 2011. | ||
-0370 (requirements and/or schedules of other Federal agencies or stakeholders have changed, provided that staff has exhausted all means for expediting an NRC response). | The latter request is still under consideration by SECY and the Commission. | ||
This schedule alignment will allow for the potential to provide the Commission with an integrated policy paper that addresses both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA.Name and statement of approval by responsible Division Director (or higher): Brian W. Sheron, Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 29}} | On October 5, 2010, the staff submitted a Commissioners' Assistants (CA) note (ML102780604) to notify the Commission of its plans for completing the SOARCA study as well as its belief that the results and reconmendations for proceeding with both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA should be integrated in a single policy paper to the Commission. This CA note also informed the Commission of the staffs intent to submit an extension request to extend the due date for the Level 3 PRA Commission paper and provided justification for combining it with the SOARCA Commission paper. | ||
An important first step is to align the schedules for providing the Commission with recommendations for proceeding with SOARCA and Level 3 PRA activities. This will facilitate informed Commission policy on whether and how to proceed with the next steps for either or both studies. The staff is therefore requesting an extension of the OEDO due date for submitting the Level 3 PRA Commission paper to June 30, 2011 and a reset of the SECY due date to July 7. 2011 to coincide with the SOARCA Commission paper. Based on the need to align with the new SOARCA schedule, the resetting of the SECY due date is justified by criteria #4 in OEDO Procedure - 0370 (requirements and/or schedules of other Federal agencies or stakeholders have changed, provided that staff has exhausted all means for expediting an NRC response). This schedule alignment will allow for the potential to provide the Commission with an integrated policy paper that addresses both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA. | |||
Name and statement of approval by responsible Division Director (or higher): | |||
Brian W. Sheron, Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 29}} |
Latest revision as of 09:22, 12 November 2019
ML12024A535 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 12/23/2010 |
From: | Gregory Bowman NRC/EDO/AO |
To: | Pamela Shea NRC/SECY |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2011-0083, SECY-2010-0166, WITS 201000119 | |
Download: ML12024A535 (2) | |
Text
tI.
Bowman, Gregor From: Bowman, Gregory -
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:25 AM To: Shea, Pamela .- 5 /",
Subject:
RE: Extension Request WITS 2010001 19/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)
Outside of Scope From: Shea, Pamela Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:23 AM To: Bowman, Gregory; ExtensionRequest, EDO
Subject:
RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SFCY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)
Good Morning Greg, SECY is waiting for one Commission office to respond to the extension. As soon as I hear back, I will let you
",IioW.
rjrk. you, From: Bowman, Gregory Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:07 AM To: Shea, Pamela
Subject:
FW: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)
Ouside of Scope From: ExtensionRequest, EDO Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:59 AM To: RidsResPmdaMail Resource; Johnson, Kevin Cc: Lui, Christiana; Coe, Doug; Uhle, Jennifer; Gibson, Kathy; Armstrong, Kenneth; Santiago, Patricia; Hudson, Daniel; Bowman, Gregory; Sheron, Brian; Lyons, James; ExtensionRequest, EDO
Subject:
RE: Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)
Kevin, "I Outside of Scope Fnanks.
Denise mb~st~fl r Fe dorwe eesww
~w~don~28 FOIWmPA al g AL-k
From: RidsResPmdaMail Resource Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1.1:42 AM To: ExtensionRequest, EDO Cc: Lui, Christiana; Coe, Doug; Uhle, Jennifer; Gibson, Kathy; Armstrong, Kenneth; Santiago, Patricia; Hudson, Daniel; Bowman, Gregory; Sheron, Brian; Lyons, James
Subject:
Extension Request WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 (PRAs)
Task Number: WITS 201000119/SECY-2010-0166 - Provide the Commission Options for Proceeding on Future Uses for Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs)
Current EDO Due Date:
January 31, 2011 (Current SECY Due Date: February 7, 2011)
Requested Due Date to EDO:
June 30, 2011 (Requested Due Date to SECY: July 7, 2011)
Justification for andlor circumstances as to why extension Is necessary:
On February 18, 2010, during the Annual Commission Briefing on Research Programs, Performance, and Future Plans, RES briefed the Commission on the need for conducting a new comprehensive site Level 3 Pr~babilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). On March 19, 2010, the Commission issued staff requirements memorandum (SRM) M100218 (ML100780578), which directed the staff to: (1) continue internal coordination efforts and engage external stakeholders in formulating a plan and scope for future Level 3 PRAs, and (2) provide the Commission with various options for proceeding which include costs and perspectives on future uses. The SECY suspense date is February 7, 2011.
On September 27, 2010, the staff requested an extension of the due date for submitting the Commission paper that will provide both the results of the completed State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) pilot study and recommendations for if and how to proceed with additional analyses for other plant and containment configurations. The extension request was submitted to allow time to complete additional analyses, external outreach, and public review activities. On September 29, 2010. OEDO approved an extension to June 30, 2011 for submission to OEDO, and requested SECY reset the due date to July 7, 2011.
The latter request is still under consideration by SECY and the Commission.
On October 5, 2010, the staff submitted a Commissioners' Assistants (CA) note (ML102780604) to notify the Commission of its plans for completing the SOARCA study as well as its belief that the results and reconmendations for proceeding with both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA should be integrated in a single policy paper to the Commission. This CA note also informed the Commission of the staffs intent to submit an extension request to extend the due date for the Level 3 PRA Commission paper and provided justification for combining it with the SOARCA Commission paper.
An important first step is to align the schedules for providing the Commission with recommendations for proceeding with SOARCA and Level 3 PRA activities. This will facilitate informed Commission policy on whether and how to proceed with the next steps for either or both studies. The staff is therefore requesting an extension of the OEDO due date for submitting the Level 3 PRA Commission paper to June 30, 2011 and a reset of the SECY due date to July 7. 2011 to coincide with the SOARCA Commission paper. Based on the need to align with the new SOARCA schedule, the resetting of the SECY due date is justified by criteria #4 in OEDO Procedure - 0370 (requirements and/or schedules of other Federal agencies or stakeholders have changed, provided that staff has exhausted all means for expediting an NRC response). This schedule alignment will allow for the potential to provide the Commission with an integrated policy paper that addresses both SOARCA and Level 3 PRA.
Name and statement of approval by responsible Division Director (or higher):
Brian W. Sheron, Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 29