ML12111A072: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 April 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
-4352 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ||
This letter is to request information to support our biennial Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection beginning June 11, | This letter is to request information to support our biennial Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection beginning June 11, 2012, at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Baseline Inspection Procedure 71152. | ||
The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the | The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensees Corrective Action Program complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews. | ||
The documents requested are copies of performance reports and lists of information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. The documents should be ready for NRC review by May 31, | The documents requested are copies of performance reports and lists of information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. The documents should be ready for NRC review by May 31, 2012. Mr. John Jandovitz, the Lead Inspector, will contact your staff to determine the best method of providing the requested information. | ||
If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection in general, please do not hesitate to call or e-mail Mr. Jandovitz at 630-829-9763 or John.Jandovitz@NRC.gov. | |||
Prior to the onsite inspection, Mr. Jandovitz will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information. | |||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. | |||
M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Eric R. Duncan, Chief Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 | |||
M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the | |||
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Docket Nos. 50 | |||
-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF | |||
-72 and NPF-77 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ | |||
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: | |||
Distribution via ListServ | |||
Requested Information for a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since October 1, 2010. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information. | Requested Information for a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since October 1, 2010. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information. | ||
: 1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub | : 1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. If any of the procedures requested above were revised after October 1, 2010, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection. This should include procedures related to: | ||
-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. If any of the procedures requested above were revised after October 1, 2010, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection. This should include procedures related to: | |||
: a. Corrective action process | : a. Corrective action process | ||
: b. Cause evaluation c. Operating experience program | : b. Cause evaluation | ||
: c. Operating experience program | |||
: d. Employee concerns program | : d. Employee concerns program | ||
: e. Self-assessment program f. Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures | : e. Self-assessment program | ||
: f. Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures | |||
: g. Operability determination process | : g. Operability determination process | ||
: h. Degraded/non | : h. Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20) | ||
-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005 | : i. System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs | ||
-20) i. System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs | : 2. A listing of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions. | ||
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM | : 3. Scheduled date/time/location of all meetings associated with implementation of the corrective action program, such as Action Report (AR) screening meetings, corrective action review board meetings, etc. | ||
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM | |||
: c. Priority or level d. Affected system | : 4. List of all Corrective Action Program (CAP) issues captured in databases operated and/or maintained by the sites corporate office with the following information. | ||
: a. CAP Number | |||
: b. Brief, but complete problem description | |||
: c. Priority or level | |||
: d. Affected system | |||
: e. Affected component | : e. Affected component | ||
: f. Responsible plant department | : f. Responsible plant department | ||
Line 64: | Line 62: | ||
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | ||
CAP # Problem | CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4 | ||
: a. CAP Number b. Brief, but complete problem description | : 5. List of all ARs generated sorted by priority and grouped by the initiating department (operations, maintenance, engineering, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, and security) with the following information. | ||
: c. Priority or level d. Affected system | : a. CAP Number | ||
: b. Brief, but complete problem description | |||
: c. Priority or level | |||
: d. Affected system | |||
: e. Affected component | : e. Affected component | ||
: f. Responsible plant department | : f. Responsible plant department | ||
: g. CAP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | : g. CAP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | ||
CAP # Problem | CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4 | ||
: 7. Copy of the latest CAP statistics | : 6. A list of all root, apparent, and common cause evaluations with a brief description. | ||
, such as the number of | : 7. Copy of the latest CAP statistics, such as the number of CAPs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as may be available, sorted by departments. | ||
: 8. Copy of the Station Mystery List. | : 8. Copy of the Station Mystery List. | ||
: 9. List of all currently extended or overdue CAP Items, sorted by | : 9. List of all currently extended or overdue CAP Items, sorted by initiation date, with the following information: | ||
: a. CAP Number | : a. CAP Number | ||
: b. Priority or significance | : b. Priority or significance | ||
: c. CAP title and short description | : c. CAP title and short description | ||
: 10. List of all CAP items that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CAP item: | : 10. List of all CAP items that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CAP item: | ||
: a. CAP Number b. Brief, but complete problem description | : a. CAP Number | ||
: b. Brief, but complete problem description | |||
: c. Reason voided or cancelled | : c. Reason voided or cancelled | ||
: 11. A list of outstanding corrective actions, sorted by priority, with the following information | : 11. A list of outstanding corrective actions, sorted by priority, with the following information | ||
Line 85: | Line 87: | ||
: b. Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc) | : b. Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc) | ||
: c. Brief, but complete corrective action description | : c. Brief, but complete corrective action description | ||
: d. Associated CAP number e. Corrective action initiation date | : d. Associated CAP number | ||
: e. Corrective action initiation date | |||
: f. Number of Extensions | : f. Number of Extensions | ||
: g. Corrective action due date | : g. Corrective action due date | ||
: h. Completion status As possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | : h. Completion status As possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | ||
Corrective | Corrective Type Description CAP Initiation Extensions Due Status Action # Date Date AR0034 CAPR Revise 0058 01/05/08 2 06/15/08 Closed Procedure NGK-003-4585 TRENDS | ||
: 13. A list of ARs generated as a result of identified trends. | : 12. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends | ||
The list should be sorted | : 13. A list of ARs generated as a result of identified trends. The list should be sorted by priority and have the following information: number, title, date initiated, status, and initiating department. | ||
number, title, date initiated, status | |||
, and initiating department. | |||
OPERATIONS | OPERATIONS | ||
: 14. List of control room deficiencies, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP and/or work order number. | : 14. List of control room deficiencies, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP and/or work order number. | ||
: 15. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP number. 16. A list of all operability determinations and ODMIs with the following information: | : 15. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP number. | ||
date initiated, initiating AR | : 16. A list of all operability determinations and ODMIs with the following information: date initiated, initiating AR, and status (open or closed). | ||
, and status (open or closed). | |||
: 17. A list of open temporary modifications. | : 17. A list of open temporary modifications. | ||
MAINTENANCE RULE | MAINTENANCE RULE | ||
: 18. List of all structures, systems, and components ( | : 18. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1): | ||
. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1): | |||
: a. Date of classification in (a)(1) | : a. Date of classification in (a)(1) | ||
: b. Reason for being placed in (a)(1) c. Planned actions and their status | : b. Reason for being placed in (a)(1) | ||
: c. Planned actions and their status | |||
: d. The current system health report | : d. The current system health report | ||
: 19. A list of maintenance preventable functional failures (MPFFs) of risk | : 19. A list of maintenance preventable functional failures (MPFFs) of risk-significant systems (include actions completed and current status). | ||
-significant systems (include actions completed and current status | |||
). | |||
ASSESSMENTS | ASSESSMENTS | ||
: 20. A chronological list of all nuclear quality assurance audits and department/station self-assessments. | : 20. A chronological list of all nuclear quality assurance audits and department/station self-assessments. | ||
: 21. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments of the CAP. 22. Copies of all audits and/or assessments of the Quality Assurance Program | : 21. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments of the CAP. | ||
-assessments for those programs related to the CAP (e.g., Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc | : 22. Copies of all audits and/or assessments of the Quality Assurance Program | ||
.) | : 23. Copies of all department self-assessments for those programs related to the CAP (e.g., Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc.) | ||
: 24. All assessments or evaluations (internal or external) regarding station or department safety culture. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE | SAFETY CULTURE | ||
: 24. All assessments or evaluations (internal or external) regarding station or department safety culture. | |||
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE | |||
: 25. List of corrective maintenance work orders (WOs). Please include the following information for each work order: | : 25. List of corrective maintenance work orders (WOs). Please include the following information for each work order: | ||
: a. WO number b. Brief, but complete work description | : a. WO number | ||
: b. Brief, but complete work description | |||
: c. Affected system and components | : c. Affected system and components | ||
: d. Date of initiation | : d. Date of initiation | ||
Line 122: | Line 123: | ||
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | ||
Work | Work Description System Component Initiation Due Status Order # Date Date WO01345 Replace breaker SI 2A-SI-PMP, 01/05/08 03/15/09 Closed 2A-BKR-08-BB4 BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump. | ||
SI 2A-SI-PMP, | : 26. Any performance indicators associated with backlog of corrective maintenance items. | ||
OPERATING EXPERIENCE | OPERATING EXPERIENCE | ||
: 27. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.) and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.,) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability | : 27. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.) | ||
. Please include the reference number (e.g., CAP #) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE | and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.,) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g., CAP #) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE. | ||
REGULATORY ISSUES | |||
: 28. Corrective action closeout packages, including CAP items with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identified violations (LIVs). Please include a cross reference linking NRC Finding numbers and LIVs to appropriate CAP numbers | : 28. Corrective action closeout packages, including CAP items with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identified violations (LIVs). Please include a cross reference linking NRC Finding numbers and LIVs to appropriate CAP numbers. | ||
: 29. Corrective action closeout packages, including CAP items with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LERs) issued. Please include a cross reference linking LER number to appropriate CAP number. | |||
: 30. Copies of CAP documents related to cross | : 30. Copies of CAP documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods. | ||
-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self | : 31. List of all ARs initiated for NRC-identified issues during baseline, supplemental, and reactive inspections, sorted by priority with the following information. | ||
-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods | : a. CAP Number | ||
: b. Brief, but complete problem description | |||
: a. CAP Number b. Brief, but complete problem description | : c. Priority or level | ||
: c. Priority or level d. Affected system | : d. Affected system | ||
: e. Affected component | : e. Affected component | ||
: f. Responsible plant department | : f. Responsible plant department | ||
Line 141: | Line 142: | ||
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below) | ||
CAP # Problem | CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4 FIVE YEAR REVIEWS | ||
: 32. A chronological list of ARs, system audits, 50.59 screenings or evaluations, operability evaluations and ODMIs, maintenance rule, root or apparent cause evaluations associated with the Safety-related 125 Vdc system including the batteries , and temporary | : 32. A chronological list of ARs, system audits, 50.59 screenings or evaluations, operability evaluations and ODMIs, maintenance rule, root or apparent cause evaluations associated with the Safety-related 125 Vdc system including the batteries, and temporary modifications since April 2007. Please indicate the status of the associated documents (i.e., open or closed) in the listing. | ||
: 33. List of CAP items related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since April 2007 (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.; | |||
Documents requested to be available as printed copies on-site during the inspection | environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each CAP item: | ||
: | : a. CAP Number | ||
: b. Priority | |||
: c. CAP problem description BACKLOGS | |||
: 34. A list of the current maintenance backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and a priority for each item sorted by system. | |||
: 35. A list of the current engineering backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and priority of each item. | |||
: 36. A list of the procedural change request backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and priority of each item. | |||
Documents requested to be available as printed copies on-site during the inspection: | |||
: a. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. | |||
: b. Technical Specifications. | |||
: c. The Quality Assurance Manual. | |||
: d. A list of issues brought to the Employee Concerns Program/Ombudsman and the actions taken for resolution. | |||
: e. The latest organization chart and phone listing. | |||
: f. Self-assessments and associated condition reports generated in preparation for this inspection. | : f. Self-assessments and associated condition reports generated in preparation for this inspection. | ||
M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the | M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. | ||
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF | /RA/ | ||
-72 and NPF-77 | Eric R. Duncan, Chief Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 | ||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: | Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRPIII\Bwd\2012 Braidwood PIR Information Request.docx X Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive X Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME JJandovitz:dtp EDuncan DATE 04/18/12 04/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | ||
DOCUMENT NAME: | |||
G:\DRPIII\Bwd\2012 Braidwood PIR Information Request.docx X Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive X Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence | |||
Letter to M. Pacilio from E. Duncan dated April 20, 2012. | Letter to M. Pacilio from E. Duncan dated April 20, 2012. | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION | INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION: | ||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Breeda Reilly RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Carole Ariano Linda Linn Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov}} | |||
DISTRIBUTION | |||
-2 Resource Breeda Reilly RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Carole Ariano Linda Linn Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov}} |
Latest revision as of 05:39, 12 November 2019
ML12111A072 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Braidwood |
Issue date: | 04/20/2012 |
From: | Eric Duncan Region 3 Branch 3 |
To: | Pacilio M Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
References | |
Download: ML12111A072 (10) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 April 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
This letter is to request information to support our biennial Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection beginning June 11, 2012, at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Baseline Inspection Procedure 71152.
The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensees Corrective Action Program complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.
The documents requested are copies of performance reports and lists of information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. The documents should be ready for NRC review by May 31, 2012. Mr. John Jandovitz, the Lead Inspector, will contact your staff to determine the best method of providing the requested information.
If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection in general, please do not hesitate to call or e-mail Mr. Jandovitz at 630-829-9763 or John.Jandovitz@NRC.gov.
Prior to the onsite inspection, Mr. Jandovitz will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011.
M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Eric R. Duncan, Chief Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77
Enclosure:
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
Requested Information for a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since October 1, 2010. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information.
- 1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. If any of the procedures requested above were revised after October 1, 2010, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection. This should include procedures related to:
- a. Corrective action process
- b. Cause evaluation
- c. Operating experience program
- d. Employee concerns program
- e. Self-assessment program
- f. Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures
- g. Operability determination process
- h. Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20)
- i. System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs
- 2. A listing of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions.
- 3. Scheduled date/time/location of all meetings associated with implementation of the corrective action program, such as Action Report (AR) screening meetings, corrective action review board meetings, etc.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
- 4. List of all Corrective Action Program (CAP) issues captured in databases operated and/or maintained by the sites corporate office with the following information.
- a. CAP Number
- b. Brief, but complete problem description
- c. Priority or level
- d. Affected system
- e. Affected component
- f. Responsible plant department
- g. CAP completion status
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)
CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4
- 5. List of all ARs generated sorted by priority and grouped by the initiating department (operations, maintenance, engineering, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, and security) with the following information.
- a. CAP Number
- b. Brief, but complete problem description
- c. Priority or level
- d. Affected system
- e. Affected component
- f. Responsible plant department
- g. CAP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)
CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4
- 6. A list of all root, apparent, and common cause evaluations with a brief description.
- 7. Copy of the latest CAP statistics, such as the number of CAPs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as may be available, sorted by departments.
- 8. Copy of the Station Mystery List.
- 9. List of all currently extended or overdue CAP Items, sorted by initiation date, with the following information:
- a. CAP Number
- b. Priority or significance
- c. CAP title and short description
- 10. List of all CAP items that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CAP item:
- a. CAP Number
- b. Brief, but complete problem description
- c. Reason voided or cancelled
- 11. A list of outstanding corrective actions, sorted by priority, with the following information
- a. Corrective action number
- b. Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc)
- c. Brief, but complete corrective action description
- d. Associated CAP number
- e. Corrective action initiation date
- f. Number of Extensions
- g. Corrective action due date
- h. Completion status As possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)
Corrective Type Description CAP Initiation Extensions Due Status Action # Date Date AR0034 CAPR Revise 0058 01/05/08 2 06/15/08 Closed Procedure NGK-003-4585 TRENDS
- 12. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends
- 13. A list of ARs generated as a result of identified trends. The list should be sorted by priority and have the following information: number, title, date initiated, status, and initiating department.
OPERATIONS
- 14. List of control room deficiencies, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP and/or work order number.
- 15. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding CAP number.
- 16. A list of all operability determinations and ODMIs with the following information: date initiated, initiating AR, and status (open or closed).
- 17. A list of open temporary modifications.
MAINTENANCE RULE
- 18. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1):
- a. Date of classification in (a)(1)
- b. Reason for being placed in (a)(1)
- c. Planned actions and their status
- d. The current system health report
- 19. A list of maintenance preventable functional failures (MPFFs) of risk-significant systems (include actions completed and current status).
ASSESSMENTS
- 20. A chronological list of all nuclear quality assurance audits and department/station self-assessments.
- 21. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments of the CAP.
- 22. Copies of all audits and/or assessments of the Quality Assurance Program
- 23. Copies of all department self-assessments for those programs related to the CAP (e.g., Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc.)
SAFETY CULTURE
- 24. All assessments or evaluations (internal or external) regarding station or department safety culture.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE
- 25. List of corrective maintenance work orders (WOs). Please include the following information for each work order:
- a. WO number
- b. Brief, but complete work description
- c. Affected system and components
- d. Date of initiation
- e. Date of completion (if completed)
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)
Work Description System Component Initiation Due Status Order # Date Date WO01345 Replace breaker SI 2A-SI-PMP, 01/05/08 03/15/09 Closed 2A-BKR-08-BB4 BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump.
- 26. Any performance indicators associated with backlog of corrective maintenance items.
OPERATING EXPERIENCE
- 27. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.)
and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.,) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g., CAP #) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE.
REGULATORY ISSUES
- 28. Corrective action closeout packages, including CAP items with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identified violations (LIVs). Please include a cross reference linking NRC Finding numbers and LIVs to appropriate CAP numbers.
- 29. Corrective action closeout packages, including CAP items with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LERs) issued. Please include a cross reference linking LER number to appropriate CAP number.
- 30. Copies of CAP documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods.
- 31. List of all ARs initiated for NRC-identified issues during baseline, supplemental, and reactive inspections, sorted by priority with the following information.
- a. CAP Number
- b. Brief, but complete problem description
- c. Priority or level
- d. Affected system
- e. Affected component
- f. Responsible plant department
- g. CAP completion status
If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)
CAP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status 001 A RHR Pump failed 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open flow criteria per SR PMP-A 5.0.5.4 FIVE YEAR REVIEWS
- 32. A chronological list of ARs, system audits, 50.59 screenings or evaluations, operability evaluations and ODMIs, maintenance rule, root or apparent cause evaluations associated with the Safety-related 125 Vdc system including the batteries, and temporary modifications since April 2007. Please indicate the status of the associated documents (i.e., open or closed) in the listing.
- 33. List of CAP items related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since April 2007 (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.;
environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each CAP item:
- a. CAP Number
- b. Priority
- c. CAP problem description BACKLOGS
- 34. A list of the current maintenance backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and a priority for each item sorted by system.
- 35. A list of the current engineering backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and priority of each item.
- 36. A list of the procedural change request backlog. Include the date initiated, a brief description, and priority of each item.
Documents requested to be available as printed copies on-site during the inspection:
- b. Technical Specifications.
- c. The Quality Assurance Manual.
- d. A list of issues brought to the Employee Concerns Program/Ombudsman and the actions taken for resolution.
- e. The latest organization chart and phone listing.
- f. Self-assessments and associated condition reports generated in preparation for this inspection.
M. Pacilio The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Eric R. Duncan, Chief Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77
Enclosure:
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRPIII\Bwd\2012 Braidwood PIR Information Request.docx X Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive X Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME JJandovitz:dtp EDuncan DATE 04/18/12 04/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to M. Pacilio from E. Duncan dated April 20, 2012.
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION:
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Breeda Reilly RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Carole Ariano Linda Linn Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov