ML12353A251: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| page count = 454
| page count = 454
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT I FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT -UNIT 1 FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT 12-November 2012 WorleyParsons 633 Chestnut St. Suite 400 Chattanooga TN, 37450 Tel: 423-757-8020 Fax
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT I FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3:
SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT
 
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 1 FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT 12-November 2012 WorleyParsons 633 Chestnut St. Suite 400 Chattanooga TN, 37450 Tel: 423-757-8020 Fax: 423-757-5869 www.worleyparsons.com WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd ABN 61 001 279 812
© Copyright 2012 WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.
* John Dizon, Over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management.
* John Dizon, Over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management.
Steve Eder is the Peer Review Team Leader Page 13 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 4. Selection of Structures, Systems and Components The selection of Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) for the Recommendation 2.3 Seismic followed the guidelines provided in Reference 3 -The Electrical Power Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance." 4.1. SWEL Selection The development of SWEL 1 began with the Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) that was developed as part of the Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE)implementation at Watts Bar, found in Reference 5 -IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations  
Steve Eder is the Peer Review Team Leader Page 13 of 451
-Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List. This list fulfills the requirements of Screens #1 through #3 found in the EPRI walkdown guidance document.
 
The SSEL was then categorized by unit, location, system, equipment class, and safety function.
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
These categories fulfill the Screen #4 requirements of systems, equipment types, and environments.
: 4. Selection of Structures, Systems and Components The selection of Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) for the Recommendation 2.3 Seismic followed the guidelines provided in Reference 3 - The ElectricalPower Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance."
Safety Function "0 -Support Function" was added in addition to the EPRI guidance to categorize equipment that does not perform one particular safety function but does support all five safety functions.
4.1. SWEL Selection The development of SWEL 1 began with the Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) that was developed as part of the Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE) implementation at Watts Bar, found in Reference 5 - IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations- Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List. This list fulfills the requirements of Screens #1 through #3 found in the EPRI walkdown guidance document. The SSEL was then categorized by unit, location, system, equipment class, and safety function. These categories fulfill the Screen #4 requirements of systems, equipment types, and environments. Safety Function "0 - Support Function" was added in addition to the EPRI guidance to categorize equipment that does not perform one particular safety function but does support all five safety functions. The locations included in the SSEL include the:
The locations included in the SSEL include the: " Control Building" Auxiliary Building" Reactor Building* Diesel Generator Building* Emergency Raw Cooling Water Pump Station.The six safety functions are: 0. Support function 1. Reactor reactivity control 2. Reactor coolant pressure control 3. Reactor coolant inventory control 4. Decay heat removal 5. Containment function This categorized list is presented in Appendix B as Base List 1. After separating the data into the previously mentioned categories, a sample was selected from Base List 1 to represent all special considerations that were required by the EPRI Walkdown Guidance.
    " Control Building
This sample was reviewed and compared to plant documentation to locate any new or modified equipment, also required by EPRI Screen #4.In accordance with the EPRI guidance, SWEL 1 includes consideration of the importance of the contribution of risk for the SSCs. SWELl was compared to the Core Page 14 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted.Some of the equipment classes that were listed in the EPRI walkdown guidance were not covered in the original IPEEE SSEL, and therefore are not present in Base List 1.However, in order to include all of the classes of equipment, the scope of the selection was expanded for this seismic walkdown to include other Category I Safety Related equipment for the classes that were not previously covered.SWEL 1 represents the full list of equipment that was selected from Base List 1 and from the Category I equipment list. SWEL 1 can be found in Appendix D.Base List 2, presented in Appendix C, is a complete list of all spent fuel pool systems and equipment.
    " Auxiliary Building
SWEL 2 is derived from this list and includes any equipment or system that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of fuel assemblies.
    " Reactor Building
After review of spent fuel pool layout drawings and consulting with plant personnel, it was determined that no equipment or system failure could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposure of the fuel assemblies.
* Diesel Generator Building
SWEL 2 can be found in Appendix D.4.2. SWEL Analysis The combined SWEL for Watts Bar Unit 1, which consists of 120 items of equipment, adequately addresses all criteria that were required for the selection of SSCs in the EPRI "Seismic Walkdown Guidance." These criteria include a distribution of environments, systems, safety functions, and classes of equipment.
* Emergency Raw Cooling Water Pump Station.
The following items were selected in order to address the new and improved equipment criteria of EPRI Screen #4 for Watts Bar Unit 1: UNID Description WBN-0-XSW-236-68DC2-S 125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, BATTERY BOARDS 1/11 WBN-O-XSW-236-79DC1-S 125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, CHARGERS 7S/9S WBN-0-CHGR-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER I WBN-0-CHGR-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER III WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INSTR INVERTER 0-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0002-E 120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-11 WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-111 Table 1 -New and Improved Equipment Page 15 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit I 5. Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys Guidance for performing the walkdowns and walk-bys required for Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic can be found in Reference 3 -The Electrical Power Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance." The walkdowns and walk-bys were conducted in accordance with this guideline and each was given a final status. If no issues were noted or only housekeeping and minor maintenance issues were noted during a walkdown or walk-by, a YES status was given to the selected piece of equipment or area. If a potentially adverse seismic condition was noted, a NO status was given and a Corrective Action Program (CAP) Entry was written to begin a functional evaluation.
The six safety functions are:
If any equipment was inaccessible, or if a portion of an item of equipment was unobservable, an UNKNOWN status was given. It is noted that there were no inaccessible SWEL items at Watts Bar Unit 1.5.1. Seismic Walkdown Procedure All one hundred and twenty (120) Seismic Walkdowns Checklists (SWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1. These checklists can be found in Appendix E of this document.
: 0. Support function
The primary types of potentially adverse seismic conditions that were addressed during these walkdowns include: " Bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware" Corrosion (beyond mild surface oxidation)" Visible cracks in surrounding concrete" Impact of soft targets" Collapsing equipment* Inadequate line flexibility Forty-nine (49) Area Walk-by Checklists (AWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1.These checklists can be found in Appendix F of this document.
: 1. Reactor reactivity control
The primary areas of observation for potentially adverse seismic conditions that were considered during these walk-bys include: " Anchorage of equipment" Cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducts* Spatial interactions between equipment" Flooding/Spray hazards" Fire hazards" Housekeeping and temporary equipment Anchorage configuration for 55 items of equipment in Watts Bar Unit 1 was verified by drawings and/or calculations.
: 2. Reactor coolant pressure control
Page 16 of 451 INTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 For cabinets and panels that were selected for walkdown, NRC guidance was followed to determine which could and could not be opened for internal inspection.
: 3. Reactor coolant inventory control
Undue safety hazards, operational hazards, or cabinets that required extensive disassembly were documented and only observable anchorage was included in those walkdowns.
: 4. Decay heat removal
5.2. SWC & AWC Summary The results documented by the SWCs for Watts Bar Unit 1 are summarized below: , 110 SWCs and 45 AWCs resulted in a YES status* 10 SWCs and 4 AWCs resulted in a NO status o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1* WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, Diesel Gen Engine 1Al Start Air Receiver A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 0 WBN-WB-001, Diesel Generator 1A-A, Room D104 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 0 WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL E WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A, D.G. 1A-A MCR PNL 2 WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B, D.G. 2B-B MCR PNL o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 N WBN-WB-010, ERCW Pump Room A, Room 1105 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 0 WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, Reactor Vent Board 1B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 8 WBN-WB-030,480V Board Room 1A, Room A851 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 N WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, Distribution BD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 a WBN-WB-032, Mechanical Equipment Room 1B, Room A924 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11" WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, 120V AC Vital Inverter 0-1" WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F, 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-111 Page 17 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6. Licensing Basis Evaluations 6.1. Licensing Basis Calculations When a potentially adverse seismic condition was identified at WBN, the condition was entered into the corrective action program. No licensing basis evaluations were performed by the walkdown team per TVA expectations to communicate any potential operability concerns as soon as they were identified.
: 5. Containment function This categorized list is presented in Appendix B as Base List 1. After separating the data into the previously mentioned categories, a sample was selected from Base List 1 to represent all special considerations that were required by the EPRI Walkdown Guidance. This sample was reviewed and compared to plant documentation to locate any new or modified equipment, also required by EPRI Screen #4.
Due to the nature of this process, no calculations were performed by the walkdown team for licensing basis evaluations before the CAP entry was submitted.
In accordance with the EPRI guidance, SWEL 1 includes consideration of the importance of the contribution of risk for the SSCs. SWELl was compared to the Core Page 14 of 451
All licensing basis determinations were performed by WBN engineering on each CAP entry.Multiple CAP entries were generated during the seismic walkdown process at Watts Bar Unit 1. There were a total of eleven CAP entries that were considered potential seismically adverse conditions.
 
No degraded or non-conforming conditions were found during the course of this walkdown process.6.2. Potential Seismically Adverse Conditions The potentially seismically adverse seismic conditions summarized above are described in more detail below.6.2.1. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 1 During the walkdown for WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, it was found that the bottom connection on the south U-bolt connection to the support saddle is not tight to the restraint.
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted.
On the north U-bolt connection to the support side, the bottom connection is missing the washer. A CAP entry was submitted to correct the loose and missing hardware.6.2.2. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 2 During the area walk-by for he Diesel Generator Room D104 (WBN-WB-001) a problem with the 1A-A Air Receiver Tank was noted. Of the two inboard anchor plates, the south anchor plate on the tank is installed such that it is resting inside the saddle. This limits it ability to function properly.
Some of the equipment classes that were listed in the EPRI walkdown guidance were not covered in the original IPEEE SSEL, and therefore are not present in Base List 1.
A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and site engineering performed an evaluation.
However, in order to include all of the classes of equipment, the scope of the selection was expanded for this seismic walkdown to include other Category I Safety Related equipment for the classes that were not previously covered.
6.2.3. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 3 During the walkdown for WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A and WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, it was found that one of the four visible connecting bolts on the south side of the bolted joint between MCR panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M015 was sheared off and one was missing. Two bolts were missing between panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B on the south side. A CAP entry was submitted and work was scheduled to replace the missing bolts.Page 18 of 451 hNTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.4. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 4 During the area walk-by for room 1105 of the Intake Pumping Station (WBN-WB-010) it was found that temporary scaffolding near ERCW pump 0-PMP-67-32 is not adequately restrained to prevent interaction with the pump motor during a seismic event. Lateral restraint was not provided in one direction at a sufficient height to prevent tipping towards the pump motor. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and the scaffolding was removed.6.2.5. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 5 During the walkdown for WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, it was found that a cap plate on a tube steel cable tray support was in direct contact with a conduit collar on the MCC. The conduit number in question was not legible. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.6.2.6. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 During the area walk by in the 480V Board Room 1A (WBN-WB-030) a fire protection sprinkler head deflector was found to be in direct contact with a four inch conduit. The conduit in question is PLC-1709, which runs into 1-JB-282-1770, and is located behind panel 10 of WBN-1-MCC-213-AO01-A.
SWEL 1 represents the full list of equipment that was selected from Base List 1 and from the Category I equipment list. SWEL 1 can be found in Appendix D.
A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.6.2.7. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 7 During the walkdown for WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, in the Main Control Room, a copier was observed in close proximity of the breaker side of the panel. The copier is not restrained and does not meet the overturn criteria that would indicate it would be safe from tipping during a seismic event. Additionally, there is a drawing table in the area that is not restrained but would not cause a risk to the panel. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it will be evaluated by Civil Engineering in the form of a Specific Case Engineering Evaluation.
Base List 2, presented in Appendix C, is a complete list of all spent fuel pool systems and equipment. SWEL 2 is derived from this list and includes any equipment or system that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of fuel assemblies. After review of spent fuel pool layout drawings and consulting with plant personnel, it was determined that no equipment or system failure could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposure of the fuel assemblies. SWEL 2 can be found in Appendix D.
6.2.8. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 8 During the area walk by in the Mechanical Equipment Room A924 (WBN-WB-032) a sheared anchor bolt was observed on the 480V Board Room Condenser B-B. All remaining anchor bolts appear to be in good condition with only minor to moderate surface corrosion.
4.2. SWEL Analysis The combined SWEL for Watts Bar Unit 1, which consists of 120 items of equipment, adequately addresses all criteria that were required for the selection of SSCs in the EPRI "Seismic Walkdown Guidance." These criteria include a distribution of environments, systems, safety functions, and classes of equipment.
A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.Page 19 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.9. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 9 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was approximately 1/8" or less. The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements.
The following items were selected in order to address the new and improved equipment criteria of EPRI Screen #4 for Watts Bar Unit 1:
It should be noted that the anchorage was not visible during the initial walkdown of the equipment.
UNID                                         Description WBN-0-XSW-236-68DC2-S           125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, BATTERY BOARDS 1/11 WBN-O-XSW-236-79DC1-S           125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, CHARGERS 7S/9S WBN-0-CHGR-236-0001-D           125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER I WBN-0-CHGR-236-0003-F           125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER III WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D           120V AC VITAL INSTR INVERTER 0-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0001-D           120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0002-E           120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-11 WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F           120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-111 Table 1 - New and Improved Equipment Page 15 of 451
The condition was observed during a subsequent inspection after the insulation surrounding the baseplate and anchorage was removed.6.2.10. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 10 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was in excess of 1/8". The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements.
 
6.2.11. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 11 During the walkdown for WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, the spacing tolerance of +/- 3" is violated between the third and fourth anchor bolts on the front of the inverter.
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit I
The field measured spacing between these bolts is 9-3/4". Per plant documentation, this spacing should be 1'-1-3/116", which is 3-7/16" greater than the as-installed anchor spacing.The as built dimension for one anchor bolt on the front of WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F does not match plant documentation.
: 5. Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys Guidance for performing the walkdowns and walk-bys required for Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic can be found in Reference 3 - The ElectricalPower Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance."
Per plant documentation, the first anchor spacing on the right side of the cabinet should be 15-5/8". The dimension in the field was measured to be 18-1/4".A CAP entry was submitted to address these issues and the calculation and drawings shall be revised as necessary to document the acceptability of the as-installed anchorage configuration.
The walkdowns and walk-bys were conducted in accordance with this guideline and each was given a final status. If no issues were noted or only housekeeping and minor maintenance issues were noted during a walkdown or walk-by, a YES status was given to the selected piece of equipment or area. If a potentially adverse seismic condition was noted, a NO status was given and a Corrective Action Program (CAP) Entry was written to begin a functional evaluation. If any equipment was inaccessible, or if a portion of an item of equipment was unobservable, an UNKNOWN status was given. It is noted that there were no inaccessible SWEL items at Watts Bar Unit 1.
Page 20 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 7. IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report Information for the IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report is derived from Reference 5-IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations  
5.1. Seismic Walkdown Procedure All one hundred and twenty (120) Seismic Walkdowns Checklists (SWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1. These checklists can be found in Appendix E of this document. The primary types of potentially adverse seismic conditions that were addressed during these walkdowns include:
-Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List.7.1. IPEEE Description In Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that the utilities for all active nuclear power plants in the United States perform an evaluation of their nuclear power generating facilities to identify any vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of several plant-specific external events, and to access the impact of these vulnerabilities on the potential for plant core damage or radioactive material release. This program, designated the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE), is a corollary program to the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) which focused on the vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of external events.7.2. IPEEE Findings and Vulnerabilities For Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant the Response Level Earthquake (RLE) is specified as a median spectral shape from NUREG/CR-0098 anchored to a peak ground acceleration of 0.3g. Screening and evaluation of outliers is performed at the level of the RLE through the use of scaled existing amplified response spectra. The vertical ground response spectrum for the RLE is taken as 2/3 of the horizontal.
    " Bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware
The items walked down during the IPEEE program were found to be rugged and robust.The IPEEE walkdowns note whether or not the items could be screened out as a result of the walkdown observations coupled with the walkdown team knowledge of the design basis conservatism's for each item.High confidence low probability of failure (HCLPF) seismic capacity calculations were prepared for items which could not be screened by other means and in all cases, the calculated HCLPF seismic capacities are greater than 0.3g. Table 2 summarizes the WBN HCLPF calculations and results.Page 21 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Item Resolution HCLPF Masonry Walls 0.53g 6900V Shutdown Boards 0.45g DG Air Intake Filters 1.78g Main Control Room AHU 0.56g Aux. Building Roof Diaphragm 0.75g RHR Pumps 0.50g 480V Shutdown Board Transformers 0.38g Control Air Pre and Aft 1.08g Filters CCS Heat Exchangers 0.38g ERCW Pumps 0.40g IPS Screen Wash Pumps 0.36g 480V Reactor MOV, Vent, 040g Cont. and Aux Boards Main Control Room Ceiling Structure Main Control Room 070g Electrical Panels 0.70g* Original HCLPF capacity of 0.36g was updated to 0.52g based on non-linear analyses of the ceiling system. No modifications were required.Table 2 -Resolution of Seismic IPEEE Outliers For observations such as maintenance and housekeeping issues, maintenance was notified and responded to these issues. It was not necessary to prepare any DCN's as part of the IPEEE seismic walkdowns.
    " Corrosion (beyond mild surface oxidation)
Page 22 of 451  
    " Visible cracks in surrounding concrete
.iu NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 8. Peer Review A peer review was performed in accordance with References 2 and 3. The peer review process involved considerable interaction with the review teams, and was performed throughout all phases of the effort including the following:
    " Impact of soft targets
* Selection of the SSCs included on the SWEL" In-plant walkdown observations and completed checklists for the Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys" Identified potentially adverse seismic conditions, utilization of the CAP process, and associated licensing basis review considerations" Submittal report In summary, the peer review results are confirmatory and fully supportive of the evaluations and findings as described in this report. The completed peer review report is included as Appendix G to this report.Page 23 of 451
    " Collapsing equipment
: 9. References NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Reference Document Title Document Preparer No. Number 1 Recommendations for Enhancing N/A United States Reactor Safety in the 2 1 st Century Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 Letter: Request for Information N/A United States Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Nuclear Federal Regulations 50.54 (f) Regulatory Regarding Recommendations 2.1, Commission 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident 3 Seismic Walkdown Guidance for EPRI Report Electric Power Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term 1025286 Research Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Institute Seismic 4 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Living Final WBNP-9 Tennessee Safety Analysis Report Amendment Valley 9 Authority 5 IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations  
* Inadequate line flexibility Forty-nine (49) Area Walk-by Checklists (AWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1.
-WBNIPEEE-001 Tennessee Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Valley Shutdown Equipment List I Authority Page 24 of 451
These checklists can be found in Appendix F of this document. The primary areas of observation for potentially adverse seismic conditions that were considered during these walk-bys include:
: 10. Appendices NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Page 25 of 451 NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Appendix A: Resumes Resumes included in this Appendix are alphabetized by last name." Joshua Best -Fukushima Project Engineer" Bryce Cusick -Site Engineer" John Dizon -Facility Risk Consultants" Mike Earles -Senior Reactor Operator* Steve Eder -Facility Risk Consultants" James Edgar -Lead Technical Engineer" Travis Hockenberry  
    " Anchorage of equipment
-Walkdown Engineer" Mike Gordon -Lead Engineer* Bill Sprinkle -Tennessee Valley Authority" Phillip York -Walkdown Engineer Page 26 of 451 Joshua H. Best ihbcst(i.Wtva.agov or loshua.Hl.Bestsr(a .tgetntlundy.com TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer -Civil Design Experience S&L, LLC TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer -Civil Design Dec. 2011 -Present-Primary technical lead for NRC's request for information under 10 CFR 50.54(o Recommendations 2.1 -Seismic and Flooding Re-evaluations and 2.3 -- Seismic and Flooding walk downs including developing project strategy, project scoping, developing and maintaining project schedules and budgets, participating in industry meetings and teleconferences, and contractor oversight.
    " Cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducts
-Responsible for supporting all civil design functions associated with response to NRC "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events" as required under EA-12-049.
* Spatial interactions between equipment
S&L, LLC. Mechanical Senior Associate  
    " Flooding/Spray hazards
-Pipe Stress Analyst June 2008 to Nov. 2011" ASME Class 2 and 3 and B31.1 piping and component qualification using TVA TPIPE piping analysis software and hand calculations" Knowledge of AMSE B31.1 and ASME Section III and VIII code requirements" Responsible for Minimum Wall Calculations (FAC Evaluations), Component Qualifications (valves and nozzles), Commodity Clearance Evaluations, Temporary Shielding Requests (pipe stress qualification), and Functional Evaluations for Plant Operability
    " Fire hazards
* Task Manager for numerous design change packages at Browns Ferry, Watts Bar and Sequoyah nuclear plants including responsibility for scoping and maintaining project schedule, budget, and interdisciplinary work flow Tennessee Valley Authority, Fossil Power Group, Intern June 2007 -May 2008 Technical Support Services (Metallurgy and Welding)Memberships
    " Housekeeping and temporary equipment Anchorage configuration for 55 items of equipment in Watts Bar Unit 1 was verified by drawings and/or calculations.
*Licensed Engineering Intern in Tennessee (Passed Fundamentals of Engineering Exam (October 2007)),Member of American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)-Member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Education BSME, Mechanical Engineering:
Page 16 of 451
May 2008 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN Focus: Energy Systems Related Course Work: Thermodynamics, Thermal Component Design, Advanced Fluids, Energy Conversion Bachelor of Arts, Natural Science: May 2008 Covenant College, Lookout Mountain, GA Related course work: Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics Page 27 of 451 Bryce C. Cusick Civil Engineer  
 
INTTF                                 Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 For cabinets and panels that were selected for walkdown, NRC guidance was followed to determine which could and could not be opened for internal inspection. Undue safety hazards, operational hazards, or cabinets that required extensive disassembly were documented and only observable anchorage was included in those walkdowns.
5.2. SWC & AWC Summary The results documented by the SWCs for Watts Bar Unit 1 are summarized below:
    ,   110 SWCs and 45 AWCs resulted in a YES status
* 10 SWCs and 4 AWCs resulted in a NO status o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1
* WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, Diesel Gen Engine 1Al Start Air Receiver A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 0 WBN-WB-001, Diesel Generator 1A-A, Room D104 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 0 WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL E WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A, D.G. 1A-A MCR PNL 2 WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B, D.G. 2B-B MCR PNL o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 N WBN-WB-010, ERCW Pump Room A, Room 1105 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 0 WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, Reactor Vent Board 1B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 8 WBN-WB-030,480V Board Room 1A, Room A851 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 N WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, Distribution BD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 a WBN-WB-032, Mechanical Equipment Room 1B, Room A924 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11
                  " WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, 120V AC Vital Inverter 0-1
                  " WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F, 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-111 Page 17 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
: 6. Licensing Basis Evaluations 6.1. Licensing Basis Calculations When a potentially adverse seismic condition was identified at WBN, the condition was entered into the corrective action program. No licensing basis evaluations were performed by the walkdown team per TVA expectations to communicate any potential operability concerns as soon as they were identified. Due to the nature of this process, no calculations were performed by the walkdown team for licensing basis evaluations before the CAP entry was submitted. All licensing basis determinations were performed by WBN engineering on each CAP entry.
Multiple CAP entries were generated during the seismic walkdown process at Watts Bar Unit 1. There were a total of eleven CAP entries that were considered potential seismically adverse conditions. No degraded or non-conforming conditions were found during the course of this walkdown process.
6.2. Potential Seismically Adverse Conditions The potentially seismically adverse seismic conditions summarized above are described in more detail below.
6.2.1. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 1 During the walkdown for WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, it was found that the bottom connection on the south U-bolt connection to the support saddle is not tight to the restraint. On the north U-bolt connection to the support side, the bottom connection is missing the washer. A CAP entry was submitted to correct the loose and missing hardware.
6.2.2. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 2 During the area walk-by for he Diesel Generator Room D104 (WBN-WB-001) a problem with the 1A-A Air Receiver Tank was noted. Of the two inboard anchor plates, the south anchor plate on the tank is installed such that it is resting inside the saddle. This limits it ability to function properly. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and site engineering performed an evaluation.
6.2.3. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 3 During the walkdown for WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A and WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, it was found that one of the four visible connecting bolts on the south side of the bolted joint between MCR panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M015 was sheared off and one was missing. Two bolts were missing between panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B on the south side. A CAP entry was submitted and work was scheduled to replace the missing bolts.
Page 18 of 451
 
hNTTF                                         Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.4. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 4 During the area walk-by for room 1105 of the Intake Pumping Station (WBN-WB-010) it was found that temporary scaffolding near ERCW pump 0-PMP-67-32 is not adequately restrained to prevent interaction with the pump motor during a seismic event. Lateral restraint was not provided in one direction at a sufficient height to prevent tipping towards the pump motor. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and the scaffolding was removed.
6.2.5. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 5 During the walkdown for WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, it was found that a cap plate on a tube steel cable tray support was in direct contact with a conduit collar on the MCC. The conduit number in question was not legible. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.
6.2.6. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 During the area walk by in the 480V Board Room 1A (WBN-WB-030) a fire protection sprinkler head deflector was found to be in direct contact with a four inch conduit. The conduit in question is PLC-1709, which runs into 1-JB-282-1770, and is located behind panel 10 of WBN-1-MCC-213-AO01-A. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.
6.2.7. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 7 During the walkdown for WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, in the Main Control Room, a copier was observed in close proximity of the breaker side of the panel. The copier is not restrained and does not meet the overturn criteria that would indicate it would be safe from tipping during a seismic event. Additionally, there is a drawing table in the area that is not restrained but would not cause a risk to the panel. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it will be evaluated by Civil Engineering in the form of a Specific Case Engineering Evaluation.
6.2.8. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 8 During the area walk by in the Mechanical Equipment Room A924 (WBN-WB-032) a sheared anchor bolt was observed on the 480V Board Room Condenser B-B. All remaining anchor bolts appear to be in good condition with only minor to moderate surface corrosion. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue.
Page 19 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.9. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 9 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was approximately 1/8" or less. The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements.
It should be noted that the anchorage was not visible during the initial walkdown of the equipment. The condition was observed during a subsequent inspection after the insulation surrounding the baseplate and anchorage was removed.
6.2.10. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 10 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was in excess of 1/8". The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements.
6.2.11. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 11 During the walkdown for WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, the spacing tolerance of +/- 3" is violated between the third and fourth anchor bolts on the front of the inverter. The field measured spacing between these bolts is 9-3/4". Per plant documentation, this spacing should be 1'-1-3/116", which is 3-7/16" greater than the as-installed anchor spacing.
The as built dimension for one anchor bolt on the front of WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F does not match plant documentation. Per plant documentation, the first anchor spacing on the right side of the cabinet should be 15-5/8". The dimension in the field was measured to be 18-1/4".
A CAP entry was submitted to address these issues and the calculation and drawings shall be revised as necessary to document the acceptability of the as-installed anchorage configuration.
Page 20 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
: 7. IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report Information for the IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report is derived from Reference 5
- IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations- Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List.
7.1. IPEEE Description In Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that the utilities for all active nuclear power plants in the United States perform an evaluation of their nuclear power generating facilities to identify any vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of several plant-specific external events, and to access the impact of these vulnerabilities on the potential for plant core damage or radioactive material release. This program, designated the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE), is a corollary program to the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) which focused on the vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of external events.
7.2. IPEEE Findings and Vulnerabilities For Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant the Response Level Earthquake (RLE) is specified as a median spectral shape from NUREG/CR-0098 anchored to a peak ground acceleration of 0.3g. Screening and evaluation of outliers is performed at the level of the RLE through the use of scaled existing amplified response spectra. The vertical ground response spectrum for the RLE is taken as 2/3 of the horizontal.
The items walked down during the IPEEE program were found to be rugged and robust.
The IPEEE walkdowns note whether or not the items could be screened out as a result of the walkdown observations coupled with the walkdown team knowledge of the design basis conservatism's for each item.
High confidence low probability of failure (HCLPF) seismic capacity calculations were prepared for items which could not be screened by other means and in all cases, the calculated HCLPF seismic capacities are greater than 0.3g. Table 2 summarizes the WBN HCLPF calculations and results.
Page 21 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Item                   Resolution HCLPF Masonry Walls                       0.53g 6900V Shutdown Boards                   0.45g DG Air Intake Filters                 1.78g Main Control Room AHU                   0.56g Aux. Building Roof Diaphragm                         0.75g RHR Pumps                         0.50g 480V Shutdown Board Transformers                       0.38g Control Air Pre and Aft                 1.08g Filters CCS Heat Exchangers                   0.38g ERCW Pumps                         0.40g IPS Screen Wash Pumps                   0.36g 480V Reactor MOV, Vent,                   040g Cont. and Aux Boards Main Control Room Ceiling Structure Main Control Room                     070g Electrical Panels                   0.70g
* Original HCLPF capacity of 0.36g was updated to 0.52g based on non-linear analyses of the ceiling system. No modifications were required.
Table 2 - Resolution of Seismic IPEEE Outliers For observations such as maintenance and housekeeping issues, maintenance was notified and responded to these issues. It was not necessary to prepare any DCN's as part of the IPEEE seismic walkdowns.
Page 22 of 451
 
  .iu                                   NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
: 8. Peer Review A peer review was performed in accordance with References 2 and 3. The peer review process involved considerable interaction with the review teams, and was performed throughout all phases of the effort including the following:
* Selection of the SSCs included on the SWEL
      " In-plant walkdown observations and completed checklists for the Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys
      " Identified potentially adverse seismic conditions, utilization of the CAP process, and associated licensing basis review considerations
      " Submittal report In summary, the peer review results are confirmatory and fully supportive of the evaluations and findings as described in this report. The completed peer review report is included as Appendix G to this report.
Page 23 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
: 9. References Reference             Document Title                   Document         Preparer No.                                                 Number 1     Recommendations for Enhancing                 N/A         United States Reactor Safety in the 2 1 st Century                       Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2     Letter: Request for Information               N/A         United States Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of                       Nuclear Federal Regulations 50.54 (f)                             Regulatory Regarding Recommendations 2.1,                             Commission 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident 3     Seismic Walkdown Guidance for             EPRI Report     Electric Power Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term           1025286       Research Task Force Recommendation 2.3:                             Institute Seismic 4     Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Living Final         WBNP-9       Tennessee Safety Analysis Report Amendment                           Valley 9                                                         Authority 5     IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations -       WBNIPEEE-001 Tennessee Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe                             Valley Shutdown Equipment List                                 I Authority Page 24 of 451
 
NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
: 10. Appendices Page 25 of 451
 
rr*                                  NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Appendix A: Resumes Resumes included in this Appendix are alphabetized by last name.
"   Joshua Best - Fukushima Project Engineer
"   Bryce Cusick - Site Engineer
"   John Dizon - Facility Risk Consultants
"   Mike Earles - Senior Reactor Operator
* Steve Eder - Facility Risk Consultants
"   James Edgar - Lead Technical Engineer
"   Travis Hockenberry - Walkdown Engineer
"   Mike Gordon - Lead Engineer
* Bill Sprinkle - Tennessee Valley Authority
"   Phillip York - Walkdown Engineer Page 26 of 451
 
Joshua H. Best ihbcst(i.Wtva.agov or loshua.Hl.Bestsr(a .tgetntlundy.com TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer - Civil Design Experience S&L, LLC TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer - Civil Design Dec. 2011 - Present
- Primary technical lead for NRC's request for information under 10 CFR 50.54(o Recommendations 2.1 - Seismic and Flooding Re-evaluations and 2.3 -- Seismic and Flooding walk downs including developing project strategy, project scoping, developing and maintaining project schedules and budgets, participating in industry meetings and teleconferences, and contractor oversight.
- Responsible for supporting all civil design functions associated with response to NRC "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events" as required under EA-12-049.
S&L, LLC. Mechanical Senior Associate - Pipe Stress Analyst                         June 2008 to Nov. 2011
" ASME Class 2 and 3 and B31.1 piping and component qualification using TVA TPIPE piping analysis software and hand calculations
" Knowledge of AMSE B31.1 and ASME Section III and VIII code requirements
" Responsible for Minimum Wall Calculations (FAC Evaluations), Component Qualifications (valves and nozzles), Commodity Clearance Evaluations, Temporary Shielding Requests (pipe stress qualification), and Functional Evaluations for Plant Operability
* Task Manager for numerous design change packages at Browns Ferry, Watts Bar and Sequoyah nuclear plants including responsibility for scoping and maintaining project schedule, budget, and interdisciplinary work flow Tennessee Valley Authority, Fossil Power Group, Intern                                 June 2007 - May 2008 Technical Support Services (Metallurgy and Welding)
Memberships
*Licensed Engineering Intern in Tennessee (Passed Fundamentals of Engineering Exam (October 2007))
,Member of American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
-Member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Education BSME, Mechanical Engineering: May 2008 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN Focus: Energy Systems Related Course Work: Thermodynamics, Thermal Component Design, Advanced Fluids, Energy Conversion Bachelor of Arts, Natural Science: May 2008 Covenant College, Lookout Mountain, GA Related course work: Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics Page 27 of 451
 
Bryce C. Cusick Civil Engineer


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Civil Engineer with 3 years of experience with the Tennessee Valley Authority at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. Job Experience includes designing structural modifications with plant system, equipment seismic qualification, design change field implementation, and other various roles of a Civil Engineer.
 
Familiar with AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code, and ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for buildings and other structures.
Civil Engineer with 3 years of experience with the Tennessee Valley Authority at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. Job Experience includes designing structural modifications with plant system, equipment seismic qualification, design change field implementation, and other various roles of a Civil Engineer. Familiar with AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code, and ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for buildings and other structures. Proficient with current design software including AutoCAD and MathCAD.
Proficient with current design software including AutoCAD and MathCAD.EXPERIENCE Tennessee Valley Authority-Served as a Civil Engineer within the Civil Engineering Design Group at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant since May 2009. Is qualified in Equipment Seismic Qualification and performed numerous evaluations of equipment during the procurement process. Responsible for field support for many torque applications and design change implementation.
EXPERIENCE Tennessee Valley Authority-             Served as a Civil Engineer within the Civil Engineering Design Group at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant since May 2009. Is qualified in Equipment Seismic Qualification and performed numerous evaluations of equipment during the procurement process. Responsible for field support for many torque applications and design change implementation. Familiar with the TVA CAP process and how it is used for problem identification and resolution. Qualified Civil Engineer in the Maintenance Rule Program responsible for maintaining structural condition of plant buildings and entering them into the CAP program and Maintenance Rule Tracking Calculation in order to monitor and drive resolution. Pipe Support Design and qualification using TVA software including FAPPS (ME150), BASEPLATE II (ME035), AutoCAD, MathCAD. Other responsibilities include field support, design change packages, verification of others work, and interface with other departments within and outside of the Engineering Organization.
Familiar with the TVA CAP process and how it is used for problem identification and resolution.
EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2008 Page 28 of 451
Qualified Civil Engineer in the Maintenance Rule Program responsible for maintaining structural condition of plant buildings and entering them into the CAP program and Maintenance Rule Tracking Calculation in order to monitor and drive resolution.
 
Pipe Support Design and qualification using TVA software including FAPPS (ME150), BASEPLATE II (ME035), AutoCAD, MathCAD. Other responsibilities include field support, design change packages, verification of others work, and interface with other departments within and outside of the Engineering Organization.
JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.
EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2008 Page 28 of 451 JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Facility Risk Consultants, Inc., Huntsville, Alabama, President, 2002-present ABS Consulting (formerly EQE International), Oakland, California, Director and Vice President of Facility Risk Division, 2000-2002 EQE International, Oakland, California, Vice President, 1998-2000; Associate, 1991-1998; Senior Engineer, 1986-1991 Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Cupertino, California, Senior Engineer, 1984-1986 General Electric Company, San Jose, California, Senior Engineer, 1984 URS/John A. Blume & Associates, San Francisco, California, Senior Engineer, 1982-1984; Associate Engineer, 1977-1980 Structural Systems Engineering, Inc., Lafayette, California, Senior Engineer, 1980-1982 Stanford University, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Palo Alto, California, Teaching and Research Assistant, 1975-1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dizon has over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management.
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY FacilityRisk Consultants,Inc., Huntsville, Alabama, President, 2002-present ABS Consulting (formerly EQE International),Oakland, California, Director and Vice President of Facility Risk Division, 2000-2002 EQE International,Oakland, California, Vice President, 1998-2000; Associate, 1991-1998; Senior Engineer, 1986-1991 Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Cupertino, California, Senior Engineer, 1984-1986 General Electric Company, San Jose, California, Senior Engineer, 1984 URS/John A. Blume & Associates, San Francisco, California, Senior Engineer, 1982-1984; Associate Engineer, 1977-1980 Structural Systems Engineering, Inc., Lafayette, California, Senior Engineer, 1980-1982 Stanford University, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Palo Alto, California, Teaching and Research Assistant, 1975-1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dizon has over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management. He has extensive knowledge in the areas of seismic analyses and design assessments of primary structures and piping systems, seismic upgrade and retrofit design, seismic qualification of mechanical and electrical systems and components, and technical development of seismic evaluation criteria and programs for various industries, including power, oil and gas, petrochemical, and high tech process and manufacturing facilities. Mr. Dizon has undertaken and managed a wide variety of seismic projects, ranging from traditional structural engineering design and seismic retrofits to complex nuclear power plant and DOE facilities' seismic verification projects. He is also a guest instructor for the ASME Continuing Education Institute on seismic design and retrofit of piping systems and mechanical equipment.
He has extensive knowledge in the areas of seismic analyses and design assessments of primary structures and piping systems, seismic upgrade and retrofit design, seismic qualification of mechanical and electrical systems and components, and technical development of seismic evaluation criteria and programs for various industries, including power, oil and gas, petrochemical, and high tech process and manufacturing facilities.
At present, Mr. Dizon is primarily involved with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation, in providing engineering consulting services for various structural and seismic-related civil issues in support of Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 Completion Project. He also provides seismic consulting services to other industries, including defense contractors and commercial equipment manufacturers, among others.
Mr. Dizon has undertaken and managed a wide variety of seismic projects, ranging from traditional structural engineering design and seismic retrofits to complex nuclear power plant and DOE facilities' seismic verification projects.
As President of Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Dizon is responsible for business development and project management activities, including managing all associated tasks under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation for seismic-related civil issues associated with the recently completed Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Project for Tennessee Valley Authority.
He is also a guest instructor for the ASME Continuing Education Institute on seismic design and retrofit of piping systems and mechanical equipment.
The seismic works included USI A-46/IPEEE implementation programs, seismic II/I spray hazard evaluations, new cable routing utilizing the SQUG/GIP methodology, MSIV seismic ruggedness verification, among others. Furthermore, he was also actively involved in the development of seismic II/I design criteria for distribution systems and equipment for 1             FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
At present, Mr. Dizon is primarily involved with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation, in providing engineering consulting services for various structural and seismic-related civil issues in support of Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 Completion Project. He also provides seismic consulting services to other industries, including defense contractors and commercial equipment manufacturers, among others.As President of Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Dizon is responsible for business development and project management activities, including managing all associated tasks under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation for seismic-related civil issues associated with the recently completed Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Project for Tennessee Valley Authority.
Page 29 of 451
The seismic works included USI A-46/IPEEE implementation programs, seismic II/I spray hazard evaluations, new cable routing utilizing the SQUG/GIP methodology, MSIV seismic ruggedness verification, among others. Furthermore, he was also actively involved in the development of seismic II/I design criteria for distribution systems and equipment for 1 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 29 of 451 JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.DOE's PDCF project, under a subcontract with the Washington Group, Inc.; and in the seismic qualification of various essential equipment for DoD's GMD project, under a subcontract with Bechtel National, Inc. and its vendors. In addition, Mr. Dizon has participated as a subject matter expert witness in a litigation project for a large foreign company in the area of seismic performance of structures, piping systems and associated equipment associated with earthquake damges in a coal-fired power plant located in South America.As EQE Project Manager for various seismic programs associated with the restart of Browns Ferry Units 2 and 3, Mr. Dizon was responsible for all engineering activities associated with USI A-46 resolution and seismic IPEEE implementation; seismic proximity and II/I spray interaction evaluations; MSIV seismic ruggedness verification; cable tray and conduit raceway and supports; and HVAC support evaluation programs.
 
These activities consisted of seismic criteria development, seismic walkdown assessments and mitigation of findings, including retrofit designs and plant upgrades.
JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.
He was also responsible for the A-46 seismic evaluation program for major equipment items at Davis-Besse, Duane Arnold and H.B.Robinson power plants. Mr. Dizon also served as Project Manager for the HVAC seismic verification program at Salem Nuclear Plant, MSIV seismic projects at Hope Creek and Brunswick plants, and participated in a number of related seismic evaluation projects at Sequoyah, Watts Bar, Bellefonte, Pickering A, Bruce A, Forsmark, Liebstadt, among others.As Managing Director of EQE's Hsinchu, Taiwan project office following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, he was in charge of the region's business development and project management.
DOE's PDCF project, under a subcontract with the Washington Group, Inc.; and in the seismic qualification of various essential equipment for DoD's GMD project, under a subcontract with Bechtel National, Inc. and its vendors.         In addition, Mr. Dizon has participated as a subject matter expert witness in a litigation project for a large foreign company in the area of seismic performance of structures, piping systems and associated equipment associated with earthquake damges in a coal-fired power plant located in South America.
Mr. Dizon managed a number of seismic risk assessment and structural upgrade projects for the high tech industry, including seismic consultation on a number of projects for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., seismic strengthening projects for United Microelectronics, Applied Materials, Winbond Electronics and Macronix International in Taiwan. In addition, he also managed the seismic upgrades for the Cypress Semiconductor and Amkor facilities and seismic design review project for IBM in the Philippines, seismic risk assessment for AMP facilities in Japan, and seismic assessment of structural and non-structural components of clean room facilities at several Intel fab plants in the Northwest region in U.S., among others.As Group Manager for EQE at the US Department of Energy Savannah River Site, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the seismic verification program of safety-related mechanical and electrical systems and components.
As EQE Project Manager for various seismic programs associated with the restart of Browns Ferry Units 2 and 3, Mr. Dizon was responsible for all engineering activities associated with USI A-46 resolution and seismic IPEEE implementation; seismic proximity and II/I spray interaction evaluations; MSIV seismic ruggedness verification; cable tray and conduit raceway and supports; and HVAC support evaluation programs. These activities consisted of seismic criteria development, seismic walkdown assessments and mitigation of findings, including retrofit designs and plant upgrades. He was also responsible for the A-46 seismic evaluation program for major equipment items at Davis-Besse, Duane Arnold and H.B.
His tasks included developing seismic evaluation criteria and procedures for restart and long-term seismic programs; managing the seismic walkdown and evaluation efforts; providing technical support in resolving seismic issues; and serving as an interface with the client. Mr. Dizon was also responsible for the seismic walkdown and evaluation of various distribution systems and critical equipment at the Pantex Facilities, including developing the walkdown screening criteria and evaluation acceptance criteria.Mr. Dizon has participated in the seismic evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Robinson power plants. Mr. Dizon also served as Project Manager for the HVAC seismic verification program at Salem Nuclear Plant, MSIV seismic projects at Hope Creek and Brunswick plants, and participated in a number of related seismic evaluation projects at Sequoyah, Watts Bar, Bellefonte, Pickering A, Bruce A, Forsmark, Liebstadt, among others.
This project involved performing seismic analyses and upgrades for the primary coolant piping system and related equipment, and the reactor and control buildings.
As Managing Director of EQE's Hsinchu, Taiwan project office following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, he was in charge of the region's business development and project management.
Other DOE facilities he has involvement with included Los Alamos, Livermore and Hanford sites. Mr. Dizon has also been involved in a number of risk assessment programs for petrochemical plants and refineries, including seismic walkdowns at the 2 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 30 of 451 JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.Imperial West Chemical plants in Pittsburg and Antioch, CA; Tosco Refinery in Avon, CA;and Dupont Chemical plant in Antioch, CA, among others.At EDAC, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and verification of a pipe support optimization program (OPTPIPE) and was involved in a number of snubber reduction pilot projects.
Mr. Dizon managed a number of seismic risk assessment and structural upgrade projects for the high tech industry, including seismic consultation on a number of projects for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., seismic strengthening projects for United Microelectronics, Applied Materials, Winbond Electronics and Macronix International in Taiwan. In addition, he also managed the seismic upgrades for the Cypress Semiconductor and Amkor facilities and seismic design review project for IBM in the Philippines, seismic risk assessment for AMP facilities in Japan, and seismic assessment of structural and non-structural components of clean room facilities at several Intel fab plants in the Northwest region in U.S., among others.
Other areas of his involvement consisted of finite element analyses of the MX-missile launch tube components and systems for thermal and pressure loads, equipment qualification of major mechanical and electrical components, and seismic evaluation of cooling towers.With General Electric Company, Mr. Dizon was responsible for stress analysis and code conformation of main steam and recirculation piping systems for generic BWR plants. He was also involved in the developmental phase of an in-house pipe support optimization program.At URS/Blume  
As Group Manager for EQE at the US Department of Energy Savannah River Site, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the seismic verification program of safety-related mechanical and electrical systems and components. His tasks included developing seismic evaluation criteria and procedures for restart and long-term seismic programs; managing the seismic walkdown and evaluation efforts; providing technical support in resolving seismic issues; and serving as an interface with the client. Mr. Dizon was also responsible for the seismic walkdown and evaluation of various distribution systems and critical equipment at the Pantex Facilities, including developing the walkdown screening criteria and evaluation acceptance criteria.
& Associates, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and maintenance of in-house computer programs for both linear and nonlinear analyses of structural and piping systems. He was also involved in the linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses, finite element modeling, and generation of floor response spectra for several nuclear power plants. He helped develop a soil-structure interaction computer program using a three-dimensional finite element technique to evaluate the dynamic response of structures due to arbitrary plane body and surface wave excitations.
Mr. Dizon has participated in the seismic evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This project involved performing seismic analyses and upgrades for the primary coolant piping system and related equipment, and the reactor and control buildings. Other DOE facilities he has involvement with included Los Alamos, Livermore and Hanford sites. Mr. Dizon has also been involved in a number of risk assessment programs for petrochemical plants and refineries, including seismic walkdowns at the 2         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
He performed a research study involving soil-structure interaction analysis using the finite element FLUSH program to investigate the dynamic response of typical containment structures due to underground blast excitations.
Page 30 of 451
 
JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.
Imperial West Chemical plants in Pittsburg and Antioch, CA; Tosco Refinery in Avon, CA; and Dupont Chemical plant in Antioch, CA, among others.
At EDAC, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and verification of a pipe support optimization program (OPTPIPE) and was involved in a number of snubber reduction pilot projects. Other areas of his involvement consisted of finite element analyses of the MX-missile launch tube components and systems for thermal and pressure loads, equipment qualification of major mechanical and electrical components, and seismic evaluation of cooling towers.
With General Electric Company, Mr. Dizon was responsible for stress analysis and code conformation of main steam and recirculation piping systems for generic BWR plants. He was also involved in the developmental phase of an in-house pipe support optimization program.
At URS/Blume & Associates, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and maintenance of in-house computer programs for both linear and nonlinear analyses of structural and piping systems. He was also involved in the linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses, finite element modeling, and generation of floor response spectra for several nuclear power plants. He helped develop a soil-structure interaction computer program using a three-dimensional finite element technique to evaluate the dynamic response of structures due to arbitrary plane body and surface wave excitations. He performed a research study involving soil-structure interaction analysis using the finite element FLUSH program to investigate the dynamic response of typical containment structures due to underground blast excitations.
Mr. Dizon worked as a consultant to Bechtel Power Corporation with Structural Systems Engineering, Inc. He performed structural analyses and design assessments of the primary containment structure and the reactor/control buildings of several BWR plants for the various types of hydrodynamic loads. He was involved in a BWR in-plant test procedures, data reduction and correlation study to determine the dynamic response, including soil-structure interaction of the reactor/control buildings during GE Mark II reactor hydrodynamic load actuation in the primary containment.
Mr. Dizon worked as a consultant to Bechtel Power Corporation with Structural Systems Engineering, Inc. He performed structural analyses and design assessments of the primary containment structure and the reactor/control buildings of several BWR plants for the various types of hydrodynamic loads. He was involved in a BWR in-plant test procedures, data reduction and correlation study to determine the dynamic response, including soil-structure interaction of the reactor/control buildings during GE Mark II reactor hydrodynamic load actuation in the primary containment.
At Stanford University, Mr. Dizon performed statistical analyses of earthquake accelerograms and various response parameters, as part of his research work under Professor Haresh Shah. He also conducted seismic risk analyses and formulated seismic design criteria for Nicaragua.
At Stanford University, Mr. Dizon performed statistical analyses of earthquake accelerograms and various response parameters, as part of his research work under Professor Haresh Shah. He also conducted seismic risk analyses and formulated seismic design criteria for Nicaragua. In addition, he was involved in the dynamic testing of structural models and equipment.
In addition, he was involved in the dynamic testing of structural models and equipment.
EDUCATION STANFORD UNIVERSITY,   Palo Alto, California: Engineer Degree, 1977 STANFORD UNIVERSITY,   Palo Alto, California: M.S. Structural Engineering, 1975 MAPUA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Manila, Philippines: B.S. Civil Engineering, 1973 3         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
EDUCATION STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Palo Alto, California:
Page 31 of 451
Engineer Degree, 1977 STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Palo Alto, California:
 
M.S. Structural Engineering, 1975 MAPUA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Manila, Philippines:
JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1973 3 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 31 of 451 JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.AFFILIATIONS AND AWARDS Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Strategic Partner Philippine Board Examination for Civil Engineers, Fifth Place, 1973 Philippine Association of Civil Engineers, Certificate of Merit, 1974 REGISTRATION California:
AFFILIATIONS AND AWARDS Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Strategic Partner Philippine Board Examination for Civil Engineers, Fifth Place, 1973 Philippine Association of Civil Engineers, Certificate of Merit, 1974 REGISTRATION California: Civil Engineer Philippines: Civil Engineer SELECTED PUBLICATIONS With S. J. Eder, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter."     SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007.
Civil Engineer Philippines:
With S. J. Eder, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006.
Civil Engineer SELECTED PUBLICATIONS With S. J. Eder, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter." SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007.With S. J. Eder, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006.With S. J. Eder, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005.With S. J. Eder, and R. D. Cutsinger.
With S. J. Eder, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005.
2003. "Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations." Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003.With S. J. Eder. 2003. "Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003.With S. J. Eder, W. H. Tong, and E. H. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing.
With S. J. Eder, and R. D. Cutsinger. 2003. "Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations."
Oakland, CA. October, 1999.With S. J. Eder. 1998. "Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities  
Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003.
-- Focus on Business Interruption".
With S. J. Eder. 2003. "Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003.
Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization.
With S. J. Eder, W. H. Tong, and E. H. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing. Oakland, CA. October, 1999.
Manila, Philippines.
With S. J. Eder. 1998. "Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities -- Focus on Business Interruption". Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization. Manila, Philippines. October, 1998.
October, 1998.With F. R. Beigi. 1995. "Application of Seismic Experience Based Criteria for Safety Related HVAC Duct System Evaluation." Fifth DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Symposium, Denver, Colorado, November 13-14, 1995.With S. J. Eder, J. F. Glova, and R. L. Koch. 1994. "Seismic Adequacy Verification of HVAC Duct Systems and Supports for an USI A-46 Nuclear Power Plant." Fifth Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, Florida, December 14-16, 1994.4 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 32 of 451 JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.With E. J. Frevold and P. D. Osborne. 1993. "Seismic Qualification of Safety-related HVAC Duct Systems and Supports." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, Denver, Colorado, July 1993.With S. J. Eder. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping Systems." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, San Diego, California, June 1991.With R. D. Campbell and L. W. Tiong. 1990. "Response Predictions for Piping Systems Which Have Experienced Strong Motion Earthquakes." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 17-21, 1990.With S. P. Harris, R. S. Hashimoto, and R. L. Stover. 1989. "Seismic, High Wind, and Probabilistic Risk Assessments of the High Flux Isotope Reactor." Second DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference.
With F. R. Beigi. 1995. "Application of Seismic Experience Based Criteria for Safety Related HVAC Duct System Evaluation." Fifth DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Symposium, Denver, Colorado, November 13-14, 1995.
With S. J. Eder, J. F. Glova, and R. L. Koch. 1994. "Seismic Adequacy Verification of HVAC Duct Systems and Supports for an USI A-46 Nuclear Power Plant." Fifth Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, Florida, December 14-16, 1994.
4         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
Page 32 of 451
 
JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E.
With E. J. Frevold and P. D. Osborne. 1993. "Seismic Qualification of Safety-related HVAC Duct Systems and Supports." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, Denver, Colorado, July 1993.
With S. J. Eder. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping Systems." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, San Diego, California, June 1991.
With R. D. Campbell and L. W. Tiong. 1990. "Response Predictions for Piping Systems Which Have Experienced Strong Motion Earthquakes." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 17-21, 1990.
With S. P. Harris, R. S. Hashimoto, and R. L. Stover. 1989. "Seismic, High Wind, and Probabilistic Risk Assessments of the High Flux Isotope Reactor." Second DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference.
With D. Ray and A. Kabir. 1979. "A 3-D Seismic Analysis for Arbitrary Plane Body and Surface Wave Excitations." American Society of Civil Engineers Nuclear Specialty Conference, Boston, Massachusetts.
With D. Ray and A. Kabir. 1979. "A 3-D Seismic Analysis for Arbitrary Plane Body and Surface Wave Excitations." American Society of Civil Engineers Nuclear Specialty Conference, Boston, Massachusetts.
With D. Ray and A. Zebarjadian.
With D. Ray and A. Zebarjadian. 1978. "Dynamic Response of Surface and Embedded Disk Foundations for SH, SV, P and Rayleigh Wave Excitations." Sixth Indian Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, India.
1978. "Dynamic Response of Surface and Embedded Disk Foundations for SH, SV, P and Rayleigh Wave Excitations." Sixth Indian Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, India."A Statistical Analysis of Earthquake Acclerograms and Response Parameters." 1977. Thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, and L. Padilla. 1977. "A Seismic Design Procedure for Nicaragua." Paper presented at the Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India.With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, C. P. Mortgat, and A. Kiremidjian.
"A Statistical Analysis of Earthquake Acclerograms and Response Parameters." 1977. Thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, and L. Padilla. 1977. "A Seismic Design Procedure for Nicaragua." Paper presented at the Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India.
1976. "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaragua, Part II, Summary and Commentary." John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 12A and 12B. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, C. P. Mortgat, and A. Kiremidjian. 1976. "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaragua, Part II, Summary and Commentary." John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 12A and 12B. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
5 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 33 of 451 Mike Earles 685 Pine Hollow Rd.Dayton, Tn. 37321 Home phone -423-775-0220 Home e-mail -jmlce@bellsouth.net Work phone -423-365-3796 Work e-mail -jmearles@tva.gov 1968 -1972: United States Marine Corps.Professional experience 1977 -2005: TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.Nuclear Assistant Unit Operator 0 Performed field activities in support of Pre-Operational testing.Nudear Unit Operator (NRC RO License)* Performed Hot Functional testing and Startup testing.Unit Supervisor (NRC SRO License)0 Responsible for managing the safe operation of WBN Unit 1.Simulator and Classroom Instructor (NRC SRO License)* Instructor for Cold License Reactor Operator (RO) upgrade training.* Lead Instructor for Advanced Electrical training." Lead Licensed Operator Requalilication Instructor, responsible for the conduct of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training program.Unit Manager (NRC SRO License)* Review, prioritize, coordinate, and approve plant work activities.
5       FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
50.59 qualified.
Page 33 of 451
IQR qualified.
 
Operations Shift Manaqer 1987 -2005 (NRC SRO License).* Responsible for the safe operation of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.2005 -Present: Retired, contracted to TVA;" Revised Operating and Test procedures." Assisted in developing the U1C7 Refueling Outage plan." Directed Tagging Office during U1C7 S/G replacement RFO.* Conducted Electrical training for Initial License class ILT 607." Lead Instructor for ILC 607, conducted both simulator and classroom training for subsequent ILT classes." Developed, administered and reviewed all of the Initial License Training weekly and NRC prep exams from 2009 through early 2012.* Currently on-site coordinator for WBN Fukushima Flood Walkdowns.
Mike Earles 685 Pine Hollow Rd.
Dayton, Tn. 37321 Home phone - 423-775-0220 Home e-mail - jmlce@bellsouth.net Work phone - 423-365-3796 Work e-mail - jmearles@tva.gov 1968 - 1972:     United States Marine Corps.
Professional experience         1977 - 2005: TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.
Nuclear Assistant Unit Operator 0 Performed field activities in support of Pre-Operational testing.
Nudear Unit Operator (NRC RO License)
* Performed Hot Functional testing and Startup testing.
Unit Supervisor (NRC SRO License) 0 Responsible for managing the safe operation of WBN Unit 1.
Simulator and Classroom Instructor (NRC SRO License)
* Instructor for Cold License Reactor Operator (RO) upgrade training.
* Lead Instructor for Advanced Electrical training.
                        " Lead Licensed Operator Requalilication Instructor, responsible for the conduct of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training program.
Unit Manager (NRC SRO License)
* Review, prioritize, coordinate, and approve plant work activities.
50.59 qualified. IQR qualified.
Operations Shift Manaqer 1987 - 2005 (NRC SRO License).
* Responsible for the safe operation of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.
2005 - Present: Retired, contracted to TVA;
                        "   Revised Operating and Test procedures.
                        "   Assisted in developing the U1C7 Refueling Outage plan.
                        "   Directed Tagging Office during U1C7 S/G replacement RFO.
* Conducted Electrical training for Initial License class ILT 607.
                        "   Lead Instructor for ILC 607, conducted both simulator and classroom training for subsequent ILT classes.
                        " Developed, administered and reviewed all of the Initial License Training weekly and NRC prep exams from 2009 through early 2012.
* Currently on-site coordinator for WBN Fukushima Flood Walkdowns.
Special assignments Approved and Coordinated WBN system transfers from Construction/Start Up Testing organization to the Plant Operations department.
Special assignments Approved and Coordinated WBN system transfers from Construction/Start Up Testing organization to the Plant Operations department.
Qualified as Startup Advisor (6 month training tour at McGuire Nuclear Plant).Team Leader for verification, validation, and implementation of WBN Emergency Operating Procedures Upgrade.Coordinated Operations activities, and participated in, NRC 'Force on Force' drills.Page 34 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Facility Risk Consultants, Huntsville, Alabama, Chief Executive Officer, 2003-present ABS Consulting, Houston, Texas, Vice President, North Asia Pacific Region, 2001-2003 EQE International, San Francisco, California, Senior Vice President, 1985-2001 (ABS Purchased EQE in 2000).URS/John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, San Francisco, California, 1982-1985 1. G. Bouwkamp, Inc., Structural Engineers, Berkeley, California, 1981-1982 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Stephen J. Eder provides senior engineering and management consultant services, licensing support, and expert testimony in the fields of natural hazards risk assessment, seismic analysis, structural performance evaluation, and retrofit design. His background includes project management, engineering, risk management, and planning for domestic and multinational corporations, insurance and financial institutions, construction companies, utilities, and the government.
Qualified as Startup Advisor (6 month training tour at McGuire Nuclear Plant).
Mr. Eder is based in Madison, Alabama.Prior to Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Eder was stationed in Tokyo, Japan for 8 years and led all operations for ABS Consulting Inc. (formerly EQE International, Inc.) in Japan, China, Korea and Taiwan -- including risk consulting, structural engineering and design, probabilistic financial loss estimation, and the development and maintenance of management systems.Mr. Eder has performed many post-earthquake reconnaissance studies -- most notably he led investigations of the M8.4 earthquake in Arequipa, Peru of June 2001; the M7.6 earthquake in Chichi, Taiwan of September 1999; and he was lead investigator of the M8.1 earthquake in Mexico of September 1985, for the US Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI).Prior to his assignment in Japan, Mr. Eder focused primarily in the seismic risk evaluation and seismic retrofit design of critical equipment and systems. Mr. Eder pioneered the development of many seismic risk evaluation procedures and criteria for the US and European nuclear power industry, the Seismic Qualification Utilities Group (SQUG), and the US Department of Energy (DOE). This included conducting a series of week-long seismic evaluation training courses for a total of about 500 engineers, and serving as subject matter expert and technical liason for industry groups.Mr. Eder served as project manager or project consultant for the seismic risk surveys of critical equipment and systems at about 60 nuclear power plants in the US and Europe, and many DOE facilities.
Team Leader for verification, validation, and implementation of WBN Emergency Operating Procedures Upgrade.
He performed research for and supported many U.S. industry and professional groups, to advance the state-of-the-art of seismic risk assessment techniques and seismic design guidelines.
Coordinated Operations activities, and participated in, NRC 'Force on Force' drills.
1 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 35 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Berkeley:
Page 34 of 451
M.Eng., Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, 1982 CLARKSON COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, Potsdam, New York: B.S., Magna Cum Laude, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1980 REGISTRATION California:
 
Civil Engineer, 1985 Alabama: Civil Engineer, 2003 PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Applied Technology Council Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Honor Society Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society American and British Chambers of Commerce in Japan COMMITTEES  
STEPHEN J. EDER PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Facility Risk Consultants,Huntsville, Alabama, Chief Executive Officer, 2003-present ABS Consulting, Houston, Texas, Vice President, North Asia Pacific Region, 2001-2003 EQE International,San Francisco, California, Senior Vice President, 1985-2001 (ABS Purchased EQE in 2000).
-- PAST EXPERIENCE
URS/John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, San Francisco, California, 1982-1985
-Electric Power Research Institute  
: 1. G. Bouwkamp, Inc., Structural Engineers,Berkeley, California, 1981-1982 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Stephen J. Eder provides senior engineering and management consultant services, licensing support, and expert testimony in the fields of natural hazards risk assessment, seismic analysis, structural performance evaluation, and retrofit design. His background includes project management, engineering, risk management, and planning for domestic and multinational corporations, insurance and financial institutions, construction companies, utilities, and the government. Mr. Eder is based in Madison, Alabama.
-Post Earthquake Investigation Team -Leader-U.S. Department of Energy -Tiger Team Member -Natural Hazards Risk Analysis-U.S. Department of Energy -Steering Committee on Natural Hazards -Technical Liason -Mechanical and Eletrical Equipment Evaluation and Design-Seismic Qualification Utility Group -Equipment Seismic Evaluation Training -Lead Instructor and Subject Matter Expert-Joint Aýmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers and Inlstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers  
Prior to Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Eder was stationed in Tokyo, Japan for 8 years and led all operations for ABS Consulting Inc. (formerly EQE International, Inc.) in Japan, China, Korea and Taiwan -- including risk consulting, structural engineering and design, probabilistic financial loss estimation, and the development and maintenance of management systems.
-Special Seismic Qualification Working Group -CoChairman
Mr. Eder has performed many post-earthquake reconnaissance studies -- most notably he led investigations of the M8.4 earthquake in Arequipa, Peru of June 2001; the M7.6 earthquake in Chichi, Taiwan of September 1999; and he was lead investigator of the M8.1 earthquake in Mexico of September 1985, for the US Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI).
-National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research -Critical Equipment Seismic Risk Analysis -Chief Researcher
Prior to his assignment in Japan, Mr. Eder focused primarily in the seismic risk evaluation and seismic retrofit design of critical equipment and systems. Mr. Eder pioneered the development of many seismic risk evaluation procedures and criteria for the US and European nuclear power industry, the Seismic Qualification Utilities Group (SQUG), and the US Department of Energy (DOE). This included conducting a series of week-long seismic evaluation training courses for a total of about 500 engineers, and serving as subject matter expert and technical liason for industry groups.
-National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) -Seismic Technical Committee Member, NFPA-13.-Building Seismic Safety Council -Seismic Rehabilitation Advisory Panel Member -Mechanical Equipment.
Mr. Eder served as project manager or project consultant for the seismic risk surveys of critical equipment and systems at about 60 nuclear power plants in the US and Europe, and many DOE facilities. He performed research for and supported many U.S. industry and professional groups, to advance the state-of-the-art of seismic risk assessment techniques and seismic design guidelines.
NEHRP, FEMA 273.-American Society of Civil Engineers  
1         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
-Electrical Raceway and HVAC Duct Seismic Design -Working Groups-Structural Engineers Association of California  
Page 35 of 451
-Seismology Subcommittee  
 
-Non-Building Structures and Equipment 2 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 36 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER SELECTED PUBLICATIONS  
STEPHEN J. EDER EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Berkeley: M.Eng., Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, 1982 CLARKSON COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, Potsdam, New York: B.S., Magna Cum Laude, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1980 REGISTRATION California: Civil Engineer, 1985 Alabama: Civil Engineer, 2003 PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Applied Technology Council Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Honor Society Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society American and British Chambers of Commerce in Japan COMMITTEES -- PAST EXPERIENCE
& PRESENTATIONS With J. 0. Dizon, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter." SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007.With J. 0. Dizon, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006.With J. 0. Dizon, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005.With J. 0. Dizon, and R. D. Cutsinger.
-   Electric Power Research Institute - Post Earthquake Investigation Team - Leader
2003. " Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations." Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003.With J. 0. Dizon. 2003. " Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003."Analysis of Ilo2 Plant Components Affected by the June :23, 2001 Mw 8.4 Arequipa, Peru Earthquake".
-   U.S. Departmentof Energy - Tiger Team Member - Natural Hazards Risk Analysis
Prepared for Hitachi Corporation.
-   U.S. Departmentof Energy - Steering Committee on Natural Hazards - Technical Liason -
December 2002. Presented in London, U.K."The Use of Modeling and Natural Risk Analysis for Power Plants". Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore."Using Risk Based Inspection Techniques to Assess Maintenance of Power Plants". 2002.Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore."Preparing Your Properties for Major Earthquakes".
Mechanical and Eletrical Equipment Evaluation and Design
2001. Prepared for Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Subcomittee, American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.December 2001. Tokyo."Earthquake Hazards and Earthquake Risks in Tokyo". 2001. TELS-Setagaya, Earthquake Disaster Information and Preparedness Seminar. October 2001. Tokyo."Geographic Information Systems".
-   Seismic Qualification Utility Group - Equipment Seismic Evaluation Training - Lead Instructor and Subject Matter Expert
2000. Prepared for Non-Life Insurance Institute, ISJ Advanced Course 2000 Program, Natural Hazards and Underwriting Capacity.
- Joint Aýmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers and Inlstitute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers - Special Seismic Qualification Working Group - CoChairman
November 2000. Tokyo.With J. 0. Dizon, W. H. Tong, and E. R. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing.
-   National Centerfor EarthquakeEngineeringResearch - Critical Equipment Seismic Risk Analysis - Chief Researcher
Oakland, CA. October, 1999.With G.S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, M.D. Quilici, and C.R. Scawthorn, 1999. "Seismic Reliability Assessment of Critical Facilities:
-   National FireProtection Association (NFPA) - Seismic Technical Committee Member, NFPA-13.
A Handbook, Supporting Documentation, and Model Code Provisions." Technical Report MCEER-99-0008.
-   Building Seismic Safety Council - Seismic Rehabilitation Advisory Panel Member -
Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY."Earthquake Risk of Independent Power Producer Stations", 1999. Prepared for Lloyd's Japan Power Seminar. June 1999. Tokyo.3 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 37 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER With J. 0. Dizon. 'Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities  
Mechanical Equipment. NEHRP, FEMA 273.
-- Focus on Business Interruption".
-   American Society of Civil Engineers - Electrical Raceway and HVAC Duct Seismic Design -
Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization.
Working Groups
Manilla, Philippines.
-   Structural Engineers Association of California- Seismology Subcommittee - Non-Building Structures and Equipment 2         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
October, 1998."3 Years After the Hanshin-Kobe Earthquake, Earthquake Risk Management, Damage Assessment and Mitigation".
Page 36 of 451
1998. High Pressure Gase Safety Association of Japan. Vol. 35, No. 2 (1998). Tokyo.With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "A Method to Assess and Improve the Operational Reliability of Critical Systems Following Earthquakes." Presented at the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA, June 1998.With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "The Development of Model Code Provisions to Address System Reliability Following Earthquakes." Presented at the ATC-29-1 Seminar on Seismic Design, Retrofit, and Performance of Nonstructural Components, San Francisco, CA, January 1998.With D. W. Jones, M. K. Ravindra, C. R. Scawthorn, and K. Iida. 1996. "Earthquake Risk Management for Process Industries".
 
High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan. Vol. 35, No.5 (1996). Tokyo.With G. A. Antaki. 1994. "Recommended Provisions for Equipment Seismic Qualification Consistent with IEEE and ASME Criteria for Use of Experience." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering, Volume 2.With P. J. Butler and R. P. Kassawara.
STEPHEN J. EDER SELECTED PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS With J. 0. Dizon, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter."     SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007.
1994. "Application of the Generic Implementation Procedure Methodology to Demonstrate Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts in USI A-46 Plants." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering  
With J. 0. Dizon, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006.
-Volume 2. Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois.With N. P. Smith and R. P. Kassawara.
With J. 0. Dizon, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005.
1994. "Future Direction for the Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois.With M. W. Eli and M. W. Salmon. November 1993. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." UCRL-ID-115714, Revision 2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory."Seismic Design of Important Systems and Components--Functionality Considerations." 1993.Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, 1993 Fall Seminar, Nonstructural Components:
With J. 0. Dizon, and R. D. Cutsinger. 2003. " Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations."
Design and Detailing.
Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003.
San Francisco, California.
With J. 0. Dizon. 2003. " Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003.
With C. Scawthorn, M. Zadeh, and G. Johnson. 1993. "Economic Impacts of Earthquake Damage to Nonstructural Components." 40th North American Meetings of the Regional Sciences Association International, Houston, Texas.With M. W. Barlow, R. J. Budnitz, and M. W. Eli. 1993. "Use of Experience Data for DOE Seismic Evaluations." 4th DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.With K. Porter, G. S. Johnson, M. M. Zadeh, and C. Scawthorn.
"Analysis of Ilo2 Plant Components Affected by the June :23, 2001 Mw 8.4 Arequipa, Peru Earthquake". Prepared for Hitachi Corporation. December 2002. Presented in London, U.K.
1993. "Seismic Vulnerability of Equipment in Critical Facilities:
"The Use of Modeling and Natural Risk Analysis for Power Plants". Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore.
Life-safety and Operational Consequences." Technical; Report NCEER-93-0022.
"Using Risk Based Inspection Techniques to Assess Maintenance of Power Plants". 2002.
National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.4 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 38 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER With J. K. Arros. 1993. "Applications of Experience-based Methods for Seismic Qualification of Distribution Systems." Prepared for Advanced Reactor Corporation FOAKE ALWR Seismic Qualification Project.With MPR Associates and Winston and Strawn. 1993. "Verifying the Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts." Prepared for the SQUG Management Guidelines Document.With Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore.
1992. "Program Plan for the Evaluation of Systems and Components in Existing DOE Facilities Subject to Nataral Phenonema Hazards." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.With J. 0. Dizon, P. D. Baughman, and G. S. Johnson. 1992. "Peer Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Integrated Interaction Program Suspended Systems Proximity Task." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority.
"Preparing Your Properties for Major Earthquakes".         2001. Prepared for Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Subcomittee, American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.
With G. S. Hardy, G. S. Johnson, and R. W. Cushing of EQE; MPR; S&A; and URS. 1992."Walkdown Screening and Seismic Evaluation Training Course." Prepared for Seismic Qualification Utility Group.With M. W. Salmon. 1992. "Technical Safety Appraisal of the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, NPH Discipline." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.With M. W. Eli. 1992. "NPH Walkdown Evaluation Summary Report -Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.With G. S. Johnson, R. H. Kincaid, and G. S. Hardy. 1992. "High-rise Building Critical Equipment Study." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.With K. E. Smith. 1992. "Seismic Performance of Standby and Emergency Power Engine Generator Systems." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.With M. W. Eli. 1991. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Prepared for the Third DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, St. Louis, Missouri.With J. 0. Dizon. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping systems." PVP-Volume 210-1, Codes and Standards and Applications for Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Components.
December 2001. Tokyo.
ASME 1991."Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines." March 1991. EPRI Report NP-7151. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute.
"Earthquake Hazards and Earthquake Risks in Tokyo". 2001. TELS-Setagaya, Earthquake Disaster Information and Preparedness Seminar. October 2001. Tokyo.
San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
"Geographic Information Systems". 2000. Prepared for Non-Life Insurance Institute, ISJ Advanced Course 2000 Program, Natural Hazards and Underwriting Capacity. November 2000. Tokyo.
With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-motion Earthquakes." EPRI Report NP-7150. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute.
With J. 0. Dizon, W. H. Tong, and E. R. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing. Oakland, CA. October, 1999.
San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
With G.S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, M.D. Quilici, and C.R. Scawthorn, 1999. "Seismic Reliability Assessment of Critical Facilities: A Handbook, Supporting Documentation, and Model Code Provisions." Technical Report MCEER-99-0008. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Data Base Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7153. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute.
"Earthquake Risk of Independent Power Producer Stations", 1999. Prepared for Lloyd's Japan Power Seminar. June 1999. Tokyo.
San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
3           FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
With J. P. Conoscente and B. N. Sumodobila.
Page 37 of 451
March 1991. "Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7152. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute.
 
San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
STEPHEN J. EDER With J. 0. Dizon. 'Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities -- Focus on Business Interruption". Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization. Manilla, Philippines. October, 1998.
5 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 39 of 451 STEPHENJ.
"3 Years After the Hanshin-Kobe Earthquake, Earthquake Risk Management, Damage Assessment and Mitigation". 1998. High Pressure Gase Safety Association of Japan. Vol. 35, No. 2 (1998). Tokyo.
EDER With Winston & Strawn, MPR Associates, Inc., etal. June 1991. "Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment." Revision 2. Prepared for the Seismic Qualification Utility Group.With M. W. Eli and L. J. Bragagnolo.
With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "A Method to Assess and Improve the Operational Reliability of Critical Systems Following Earthquakes." Presented at the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA, June 1998.
1991. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." Special Release for 3rd DOE Natural Phenomena Hazard Mitigation Conference, October 1991, St. Louis, Missouri.With L. J. Bragagnolo and J. P. Conoscente.
With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "The Development of Model Code Provisions to Address System Reliability Following Earthquakes." Presented at the ATC-29-1 Seminar on Seismic Design, Retrofit, and Performance of Nonstructural Components, San Francisco, CA, January 1998.
1990. "A Proposed Methodology for the Seismic Design of Rectangular Duct Systems." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California.
With D. W. Jones, M. K. Ravindra, C. R. Scawthorn, and K. Iida. 1996. "Earthquake Risk Management for Process Industries". High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan. Vol. 35, No.
ATC-29.With J. J. Johnson and N. P. Smith. 1990. "Developments of the Seismic Qualification Utility Group." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California.
5 (1996). Tokyo.
ATC-29.With W. Djordjevic, J. Eidinger, and F. Hettinger.
With G. A. Antaki. 1994. "Recommended Provisions for Equipment Seismic Qualification Consistent with IEEE and ASME Criteria for Use of Experience." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering, Volume 2.
1990. "American Society of Civil Engineers Activities on Seismic Design of Electrical Raceways." Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990.With H. L. Williams.
With P. J. Butler and R. P. Kassawara. 1994. "Application of the Generic Implementation Procedure Methodology to Demonstrate Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts in USI A-46 Plants." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering -
1990. "Qualification of Cable Tray Supports by Earthquake Experience Data: Application at H. B. Robinson Plant" Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990.With R. P. Kennedy, J. D. Stevenson, J. J. Johnson, W. R. Schmidt, and K. Collins. June 1990."Watts Bar Civil Program Review." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority.
Volume 2. Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois.
With J. P. Conoscente, B. N. Sumodobila, and S. P. Harris. 1989. "Seismic Fatigue Evaluation of Rod Hung Systems." Prepared for the Tenth Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, (SMiRT).With P. D. Smith and J. P. Conoscente.
With N. P. Smith and R. P. Kassawara. 1994. "Future Direction for the Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois.
December 1988. "SQUG Cable Tray and Conduit Evaluation Procedure." Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, FL.With P. I. Yanev. 1988. "Evaluation of Cable Tray and Conduit Systems Using the Seismic Experience Data Base." Nuclear Engineering and Design (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 107: 149-153.With S. P. Harris, P. D. Smith, and J. E. Hoekendijk.
With M. W. Eli and M. W. Salmon. November 1993. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." UCRL-ID-115714, Revision 2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
October 1988. "Performance of Condensers and Main Steam Piping in Past Earthquakes." Report prepared for General Electric Nuclear Energy Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group. San Francisco:
"Seismic Design of Important Systems and Components--Functionality Considerations." 1993.
EQE Engineering.
Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, 1993 Fall Seminar, Nonstructural Components: Design and Detailing. San Francisco, California.
With J. J. Johnson, G. S. Hardy, N. G. Horstman, G. Rigamonti, M. R. Reyne, and D. R. Ketcham.August 1988. "Technical Basis, Procedures and Guidelines for, Seismic Characterization of Savannah River Plant Reactors." E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co, Aiken, South Carolina.6 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 40 of 451 STEPHEN J. EDER With S. P. Harris, P. S. Hashimoto, J. 0. Dizon, B. Sumodobila, G. M. Zaharoff, and L. J.Bragagnolo.
With C. Scawthorn, M. Zadeh, and G. Johnson. 1993. "Economic Impacts of Earthquake Damage to Nonstructural Components." 40th North American Meetings of the Regional Sciences Association International, Houston, Texas.
March 1988. "Seismic Evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Primary Containment System." Report prepared for Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. San Francisco:
With M. W. Barlow, R. J. Budnitz, and M. W. Eli. 1993. "Use of Experience Data for DOE Seismic Evaluations." 4th DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
EQE Engineering..
With K. Porter, G. S. Johnson, M. M. Zadeh, and C. Scawthorn. 1993. "Seismic Vulnerability of Equipment in Critical Facilities: Life-safety and Operational Consequences." Technical; Report NCEER-93-0022. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
With S. W. Swan, "Summary of the Effects of the 1985 Mexico Earthquake to Power and Industrial Facilities." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers International Conference on the 1985 Mexico Earthquake, Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, Mexico City, Mexico, September 1986.With A. F. Kabir and S. Bolourchi, "Seismic Response of Pipes Supported on Complex Framing Systems." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Structures Congress, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1986.With S. W. Swan, "The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985; Performance of Power and Industrial Facilities," Proceedings of the Third U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Charleston, South Carolina, August 1986."Performance of Industrial Facilities in the Mexican Earthquake of September 19, 1985," Electric Power Research Institute Report No. NP-4605, Project 1707-30 Final Report, Palo Alto, California, June 1986, also presented at the IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Mexico City, Mexico, July 1986."Earthquake Response Analysis of a Braced Offshore Platform," University of California, Berkeley (June 1982), also American Petroleum Institute, October 1982, San Francisco, California.
4         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
7 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.Page 41 of 451 WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, RE resources  
Page 38 of 451
& energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer
 
STEPHEN J. EDER With J. K. Arros. 1993. "Applications of Experience-based Methods for Seismic Qualification of Distribution Systems." Prepared for Advanced Reactor Corporation FOAKE ALWR Seismic Qualification Project.
With MPR Associates and Winston and Strawn. 1993. "Verifying the Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts." Prepared for the SQUG Management Guidelines Document.
With Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 1992. "Program Plan for the Evaluation of Systems and Components in Existing DOE Facilities Subject to Nataral Phenonema Hazards."
Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.
With J. 0. Dizon, P. D. Baughman, and G. S. Johnson. 1992. "Peer Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Integrated Interaction Program Suspended Systems Proximity Task." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority.
With G. S. Hardy, G. S. Johnson, and R. W. Cushing of EQE; MPR; S&A; and URS. 1992.
"Walkdown Screening and Seismic Evaluation Training Course." Prepared for Seismic Qualification Utility Group.
With M. W. Salmon. 1992. "Technical Safety Appraisal of the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, NPH Discipline." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.
With M. W. Eli. 1992. "NPH Walkdown Evaluation Summary Report - Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.
With G. S. Johnson, R. H. Kincaid, and G. S. Hardy. 1992. "High-rise Building Critical Equipment Study." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
With K. E. Smith. 1992. "Seismic Performance of Standby and Emergency Power Engine Generator Systems." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
With M. W. Eli. 1991. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Prepared for the Third DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, St. Louis, Missouri.
With J. 0. Dizon. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping systems." PVP-Volume 210-1, Codes and Standards and Applications for Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Components. ASME 1991.
"Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines." March 1991. EPRI Report NP-7151. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-motion Earthquakes." EPRI Report NP-7150. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Data Base Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7153. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
With J. P. Conoscente and B. N. Sumodobila. March 1991. "Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7152. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International.
5         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
Page 39 of 451
 
STEPHENJ. EDER With Winston & Strawn, MPR Associates, Inc., etal. June 1991. "Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment." Revision 2. Prepared for the Seismic Qualification Utility Group.
With M. W. Eli and L. J. Bragagnolo. 1991. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." Special Release for 3rd DOE Natural Phenomena Hazard Mitigation Conference, October 1991, St. Louis, Missouri.
With L. J. Bragagnolo and J. P. Conoscente. 1990. "A Proposed Methodology for the Seismic Design of Rectangular Duct Systems." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California. ATC-29.
With J. J. Johnson and N. P. Smith. 1990. "Developments of the Seismic Qualification Utility Group." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California. ATC-29.
With W. Djordjevic, J. Eidinger, and F. Hettinger. 1990. "American Society of Civil Engineers Activities on Seismic Design of Electrical Raceways." Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990.
With H. L. Williams. 1990. "Qualification of Cable Tray Supports by Earthquake Experience Data: Application at H. B. Robinson Plant" Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990.
With R. P. Kennedy, J. D. Stevenson, J. J. Johnson, W. R. Schmidt, and K. Collins. June 1990.
"Watts Bar Civil Program Review." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority.
With J. P. Conoscente, B. N. Sumodobila, and S. P. Harris. 1989. "Seismic Fatigue Evaluation of Rod Hung Systems." Prepared for the Tenth Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, (SMiRT).
With P. D. Smith and J. P. Conoscente. December 1988. "SQUG Cable Tray and Conduit Evaluation Procedure." Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, FL.
With P. I. Yanev. 1988. "Evaluation of Cable Tray and Conduit Systems Using the Seismic Experience Data Base." Nuclear Engineering and Design (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 107: 149-153.
With S. P. Harris, P. D. Smith, and J. E. Hoekendijk. October 1988. "Performance of Condensers and Main Steam Piping in Past Earthquakes." Report prepared for General Electric Nuclear Energy Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group. San Francisco: EQE Engineering.
With J. J. Johnson, G. S. Hardy, N. G. Horstman, G. Rigamonti, M. R. Reyne, and D. R. Ketcham.
August 1988. "Technical Basis, Procedures and Guidelines for, Seismic Characterization of Savannah River Plant Reactors." E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co, Aiken, South Carolina.
6         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
Page 40 of 451
 
STEPHEN J. EDER With S. P. Harris, P. S. Hashimoto, J. 0. Dizon, B. Sumodobila, G. M. Zaharoff, and L. J.
Bragagnolo. March 1988. "Seismic Evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Primary Containment System." Report prepared for Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. San Francisco: EQE Engineering..
With S. W. Swan, "Summary of the Effects of the 1985 Mexico Earthquake to Power and Industrial Facilities." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers International Conference on the 1985 Mexico Earthquake, Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, Mexico City, Mexico, September 1986.
With A. F. Kabir and S. Bolourchi, "Seismic Response of Pipes Supported on Complex Framing Systems." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Structures Congress, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1986.
With S. W. Swan, "The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985; Performance of Power and Industrial Facilities," Proceedings of the Third U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Charleston, South Carolina, August 1986.
"Performance of Industrial Facilities in the Mexican Earthquake of September 19, 1985," Electric Power Research Institute Report No. NP-4605, Project 1707-30 Final Report, Palo Alto, California, June 1986, also presented at the IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Mexico City, Mexico, July 1986.
"Earthquake Response Analysis of a Braced Offshore Platform," University of California, Berkeley (June 1982), also American Petroleum Institute, October 1982, San Francisco, California.
7         FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
Page 41 of 451
 
WorleyParsons                                                                       James P. Edgar, RE resources &energy                                                             Chief Civil/Structural Engineer Resume*


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Chief Engineer with over 10 years of project retrofit, design, and management experience with WorleyParsons.
 
Primary responsibilities included the project management, project engineering, and the overall structural engineering and design, coordination, and estimating for all types of retrofit and design projects.
Chief Engineer with over 10 years of project retrofit, design, and management experience with WorleyParsons. Primary responsibilities included the project management, project engineering, and the overall structural engineering and design, coordination, and estimating for all types of retrofit and design projects. Tasks included structural steel design and inspection, engineering man-hour and material cost estimating, scheduling, and fabrication/erection technical support and construction field support. Responsibilities include performing as the engineering task lead for structural steel for multi-million dollar/large scale structural retrofit projects. In addition, tasks include managing the structural condition assessment services performed by the WorleyParsons' Chattanooga office.
Tasks included structural steel design and inspection, engineering man-hour and material cost estimating, scheduling, and fabrication/erection technical support and construction field support. Responsibilities include performing as the engineering task lead for structural steel for multi-million dollar/large scale structural retrofit projects.
EXPERIENCE 2009 - Present             Project Manager, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Oversee multi-discipline projects. Responsibilities include development, management, and execution of the project scope, schedule and budget. Typical project responsibilities include management of several concurrent projects from proposal development, to the conceptual study phase, through design implementation, and construction support.
In addition, tasks include managing the structural condition assessment services performed by the WorleyParsons' Chattanooga office.EXPERIENCE 2009 -Present Project Manager, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Oversee multi-discipline projects.
2006 - 2009               Principal Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Alstom ECS/ Kansas City Power & Light (KCPL) - latan Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Project, Alstom Project Partnership. Task lead overseeing engineering and design of ductwork, new support structures and the reinforcement of the existing support structure to accommodate the SCR retrofit project. Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, foundations and other miscellaneous structural projects associated with the SCR project. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted man hours and schedule. Review and approval shop fabrication and detailed drawings for structural steel and ductwork. Facilitate all communications between the Chattanooga and Knoxville offices as well as provide estimating and scheduling for all current and future projects, optional design arrangements, and engineering studies. Conduct several site visits to determine the construction feasibility of present and future projects as well as to investigate and propose alternative arrangement options for the support of the SCR system.
Responsibilities include development, management, and execution of the project scope, schedule and budget. Typical project responsibilities include management of several concurrent projects from proposal development, to the conceptual study phase, through design implementation, and construction support.2006 -2009 Principal Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Alstom ECS/ Kansas City Power & Light (KCPL) -latan Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Project, Alstom Project Partnership.
Alstom Performance Projects - Miscellaneous Projects. Task lead overseeing engineering and design of several miscellaneous structural steel, ductwork, and fossil projects. Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, and other structural projects associated with fossil sites. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted manhours and schedule. Projects include:
Task lead overseeing engineering and design of ductwork, new support structures and the reinforcement of the existing support structure to accommodate the SCR retrofit project. Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, foundations and other miscellaneous structural projects associated with the SCR project. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted man hours and schedule.
                          = Lamma Low NOx Ductwork Installation and Structural Steel Modifications Desota Low NOx Ductwork Installation
Review and approval shop fabrication and detailed drawings for structural steel and ductwork.
                          > Dominion Generation Chesterfield Station Furnace Buckstay Upgrade Study 2007 - Present             Condition Assessment Services Team Leader, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee In addition to senior structural engineering activities, additional responsibilities include coordinating and leading condition assessment inspections at fossil power plants. The Chattanooga inspection 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                 Corporate Base                                                 Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Facilitate all communications between the Chattanooga and Knoxville offices as well as provide estimating and scheduling for all current and future projects, optional design arrangements, and engineering studies. Conduct several site visits to determine the construction feasibility of present and future projects as well as to investigate and propose alternative arrangement options for the support of the SCR system.Alstom Performance Projects -Miscellaneous Projects.
EcoNomics Page 42 of 451
Task lead overseeing engineering and design of several miscellaneous structural steel, ductwork, and fossil projects.
 
Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, and other structural projects associated with fossil sites. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted manhours and schedule.
ril           WorleyParsons                                                                     James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy                                                           Chief Civil/Structural Engineer
Projects include:= Lamma Low NOx Ductwork Installation and Structural Steel Modifications Desota Low NOx Ductwork Installation
            .....     *.....     ~             ....                                                                    Resume group consists of 16 civil/structural engineers who performed condition assessment inspections throughout the U.S. for several different utility companies.
> Dominion Generation Chesterfield Station Furnace Buckstay Upgrade Study 2007 -Present Condition Assessment Services Team Leader, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee In addition to senior structural engineering activities, additional responsibilities include coordinating and leading condition assessment inspections at fossil power plants. The Chattanooga inspection 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Coordinating responsibilities include estimating and scheduling manpower, developing a detailed inspection criteria, also evaluating and documenting the existing conditions of the respective component during the inspection. Post-inspection responsibilities include formalizing inspection findings, formulating necessary modifications and reinforcements, outlining future recommendations and inspection plans, reviewing the findings of team members, and executing any subsequent structural engineering tasks or engineering studies.
EcoNomics Page 42 of 451 ril WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources  
Typical inspections include:
&energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer..... ....~ Resume group consists of 16 civil/structural engineers who performed condition assessment inspections throughout the U.S. for several different utility companies.
Air and flue gas ductwork (internal and external)
Coordinating responsibilities include estimating and scheduling manpower, developing a detailed inspection criteria, also evaluating and documenting the existing conditions of the respective component during the inspection.
Circulating cooling water tunnels Coal handling bins, Chimneys and stacks, complete interior and exterior inspection Boiler internals and pressure vessels Furnace stiffening systems Miscellaneous structural systems at a typical fossil site Responsible Engineer, TVA Project Partnership Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Project Partnership. Project lead overseeing multi-discipline projects. Responsibilities include role as the technical lead for the multi-discipline effort as well as the point of contact between all engineers, designers, vendors, suppliers, and TVA management.
Post-inspection responsibilities include formalizing inspection findings, formulating necessary modifications and reinforcements, outlining future recommendations and inspection plans, reviewing the findings of team members, and executing any subsequent structural engineering tasks or engineering studies.Typical inspections include: Air and flue gas ductwork (internal and external)Circulating cooling water tunnels Coal handling bins, Chimneys and stacks, complete interior and exterior inspection Boiler internals and pressure vessels Furnace stiffening systems Miscellaneous structural systems at a typical fossil site Responsible Engineer, TVA Project Partnership Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) -Project Partnership.
Tasks include technical review of engineering and design, perform documentation of modifications, monitor allocation and utilization of estimated budget, and presentation of design proposals, progress, and construction planning to plant and construction management. Projects include:
Project lead overseeing multi-discipline projects.
Cumberland Fossil SCR Hopper and LPA Screen Installation and Existing Steel Modifications Multi-site TVA Chimney Structural Review and Reinforcement Project TVA Fossil Power Plants Condition Assessment Inspections CPS Energy - Braunig Peaker Project (Combustion Turbine). Responsibilities include the design of several new and retrofitted structures and new equipment foundations. Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and serviceability of the new structures and foundations associated with the new combustion turbine project.
Responsibilities include role as the technical lead for the multi-discipline effort as well as the point of contact between all engineers, designers, vendors, suppliers, and TVA management.
2005     - 2006           Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) - Roxboro Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). Responsibilities include the design of large ductwork and their support structures. Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and thermal expansion characteristics for large ductwork associated with the new FGD system. In addition, responsibilities include designing the support steel and foundations for the FGD ductwork support structures.
Tasks include technical review of engineering and design, perform documentation of modifications, monitor allocation and utilization of estimated budget, and presentation of design proposals, progress, and construction planning to plant and construction management.
Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) - Mayo Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). In anticipation of future FGD project, conducted internal duct inspection for the Unit 1 ductwork at PGNC's Mayo plant site and provided report evaluating the condition of the ductwork and its structural components and recommending repairs.
Projects include: Cumberland Fossil SCR Hopper and LPA Screen Installation and Existing Steel Modifications Multi-site TVA Chimney Structural Review and Reinforcement Project TVA Fossil Power Plants Condition Assessment Inspections CPS Energy -Braunig Peaker Project (Combustion Turbine).
Alstom (Chattanooga) - TXU Oak Grove Hot Air Duct to Mills (New Boiler). Structural engineer for the design of the Hot Air Duct to the Mills for a new boiler construction project. Performed structural analysis of ductwork and support measures in addition to specifying metal expansion 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                               Corporate Base                                                 Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Responsibilities include the design of several new and retrofitted structures and new equipment foundations.
EcoNomics Page 43 of 451
Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and serviceability of the new structures and foundations associated with the new combustion turbine project.2005 -2006 Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) -Roxboro Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). Responsibilities include the design of large ductwork and their support structures.
 
Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and thermal expansion characteristics for large ductwork associated with the new FGD system. In addition, responsibilities include designing the support steel and foundations for the FGD ductwork support structures.
rii           WorleyParsons                                                                       James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy                                                             Chief Civil/Structural Engineer
Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) -Mayo Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). In anticipation of future FGD project, conducted internal duct inspection for the Unit 1 ductwork at PGNC's Mayo plant site and provided report evaluating the condition of the ductwork and its structural components and recommending repairs.Alstom (Chattanooga)  
                              -,....                           .                   >Re                                     umeý joints. Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.
-TXU Oak Grove Hot Air Duct to Mills (New Boiler). Structural engineer for the design of the Hot Air Duct to the Mills for a new boiler construction project. Performed structural analysis of ductwork and support measures in addition to specifying metal expansion 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
TVA. Responsible for several miscellaneous structural engineering projects involving structural steel design, duct design and analysis and design of retaining wall structures for both fossil and hydro power plants. Other responsibilities included providing technical support and temporary structure design to help facilitate construction efforts during plant modification projects. In addition, responsibilities include internal structural inspections for circulating cooling water tunnel systems.
EcoNomics Page 43 of 451 rii WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources  
2001 - 2005               Structural Engineer, Alstom Power, Chattanooga, Tennessee East Kentucky Power - Spurlock No. 1, SCR Project. Responsibilities included the structural design of SCR ductwork, specification of fabric expansion joints, and slide gate and louver dampers.
& energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer-,.... .>Re umeýjoints. Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.TVA. Responsible for several miscellaneous structural engineering projects involving structural steel design, duct design and analysis and design of retaining wall structures for both fossil and hydro power plants. Other responsibilities included providing technical support and temporary structure design to help facilitate construction efforts during plant modification projects.
Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.
In addition, responsibilities include internal structural inspections for circulating cooling water tunnel systems.2001 -2005 Structural Engineer, Alstom Power, Chattanooga, Tennessee East Kentucky Power -Spurlock No. 1, SCR Project. Responsibilities included the structural design of SCR ductwork, specification of fabric expansion joints, and slide gate and louver dampers.Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.Tucson Electric -Springerville Units I and 2 LowNOx Retrofit Project. Responsible for overall layout and design of ductwork, structural steel, SOFA, air registers, access platforms, and modifications to the existing ductwork.
Tucson Electric - Springerville Units I and 2 LowNOx Retrofit Project. Responsible for overall layout and design of ductwork, structural steel, SOFA, air registers, access platforms, and modifications to the existing ductwork. In addition, preformed structural analysis of existing support steel and provided details to reinforce the structure. Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including Platte River, Lower River Colorado Authorities, TXU, PacificCorp, and Kentucky Utilities.
In addition, preformed structural analysis of existing support steel and provided details to reinforce the structure.
Mobile Energy Service Corporation - Power Boiler No. 9, Furnace Explosion Rehabilitation Project. Structural engineer for the inspection of damaged boiler structural steel, access platforms, and furnace stiffeners. Produced inspection reports, design sketches, condition assessments, and material estimates to customer for required modifications/reinforcement and/or replacement of damaged steel.
Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including Platte River, Lower River Colorado Authorities, TXU, PacificCorp, and Kentucky Utilities.
Dominion Generation - Chesterfield Unit 5, Secondary Air Duct Modifications. Structural engineer for the design of modifications to the secondary air duct stiffener framing, supports, and guides to accommodate the installation of new duct openings and new expansion joint placement.
Mobile Energy Service Corporation  
Specified new fabric expansion joints and provided detailed sketches for construction. Provided OEM with ductwork applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.
-Power Boiler No. 9, Furnace Explosion Rehabilitation Project. Structural engineer for the inspection of damaged boiler structural steel, access platforms, and furnace stiffeners.
Dominion Generation - Chesterfield No. 6, Ductwork and Furnace Upgrade Study. Conducted structural analysis of existing boiler framing and flue gas ductwork systems for FD/ID fan pressure upgrades. Additional responsibilities included secondary site inspections to determine the construction sequencing and identify potential design changes of new ductwork/boiler framing modifications. Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including TXU, Exelon, and Indianapolis Power and Light.
Produced inspection reports, design sketches, condition assessments, and material estimates to customer for required modifications/reinforcement and/or replacement of damaged steel.Dominion Generation  
Dominion Generation - Chesterfield No. 6, Ash Handling Tank Support Steel. Designed new support structure for an ash handling tank and equipment for the Economizer hopper. Evaluated the existing structural steel and provided detailed modifications to reinforce the existing structure effected by the new steel and equipment.
-Chesterfield Unit 5, Secondary Air Duct Modifications.
EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2001 Pursuing a Masters in Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2003 - Present 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-003"3                                 Corporate Base                                               Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Structural engineer for the design of modifications to the secondary air duct stiffener framing, supports, and guides to accommodate the installation of new duct openings and new expansion joint placement.
EcoNomics Page 44 of 451
Specified new fabric expansion joints and provided detailed sketches for construction.
 
Provided OEM with ductwork applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.Dominion Generation  
WorleyParsons                                                                                     James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy                                                                         Chief Civil/Structural Engineer
-Chesterfield No. 6, Ductwork and Furnace Upgrade Study. Conducted structural analysis of existing boiler framing and flue gas ductwork systems for FD/ID fan pressure upgrades.
::"* :*.*:.. :* ::*i    .. . : ... *:::..":... : :*.** ..:: *:'.
Additional responsibilities included secondary site inspections to determine the construction sequencing and identify potential design changes of new ductwork/boiler framing modifications.
                                                    .........                  ".. .. .;; . ' ::T.... ... * *: * ':   " ' *...           .......
Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including TXU, Exelon, and Indianapolis Power and Light.Dominion Generation  
S,.Resume REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Engineer - Tennessee, No.112009, 2008 One Way Element Leader, Element 9 Management of Change Member, AISC, ASCE Confined Space and Fall Protection Trained Member, STAAD User Group Wood Design CED Certified PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS ASCE Duct Design 2008 Structural Department Presentation Duct Inspection Procedures 2008 Structural Department Presentation Beam and Column Reinforcing Procedures 2008 Group Presentation ASCE Wind Design Structures and Ducts 2007 Group Presentation SCR Systems 2005 Structural Department Presentation SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES.
-Chesterfield No. 6, Ash Handling Tank Support Steel. Designed new support structure for an ash handling tank and equipment for the Economizer hopper. Evaluated the existing structural steel and provided detailed modifications to reinforce the existing structure effected by the new steel and equipment.
Doer-Seller Account Planning, 2010 Frontline Leadership Program, 2009 Prestressing Concrete (UTK) - Properties of prestressing materials; methods of pre-tensioning and post-tensioning; and analysis and design of simple and continuous beams and slabs Behavior of Steel Structures (UTK) - Focused on the design of beams, columns, beam-columns, connections, bracing, tension members, and the interpretation of the ASD and LRFD specifications.
EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2001 Pursuing a Masters in Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2003 -Present 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-003"3 Corporate Base Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Statically Indeterminate Structures (UTC) - Analysis of frames, trusses, columns, and continuous beams by force methods and slope deflection.
EcoNomics Page 44 of 451 WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources  
Analysis of Plates and Shells (UTC) - Bending and buckling of plates and shells and non-linear analysis of cables and cable roof structures.
& energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer:.. .. .: ...": ... : ..:: " .. .. .;; .' ::T. ... ... ': " ' .. .........  
Computer Skills:
.......S,.Resume REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Engineer -Tennessee, No.112009, 2008 One Way Element Leader, Element 9 Management of Change Member, AISC, ASCE Confined Space and Fall Protection Trained Member, STAAD User Group Wood Design CED Certified PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS ASCE Duct Design 2008 Structural Department Presentation Duct Inspection Procedures 2008 Structural Department Presentation Beam and Column Reinforcing Procedures 2008 Group Presentation ASCE Wind Design Structures and Ducts 2007 Group Presentation SCR Systems 2005 Structural Department Presentation SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES.Doer-Seller Account Planning, 2010 Frontline Leadership Program, 2009 Prestressing Concrete (UTK) -Properties of prestressing materials; methods of pre-tensioning and post-tensioning; and analysis and design of simple and continuous beams and slabs Behavior of Steel Structures (UTK) -Focused on the design of beams, columns, beam-columns, connections, bracing, tension members, and the interpretation of the ASD and LRFD specifications.
STAADPro 2004                                   AutoCAD: 2000, 2004.
Statically Indeterminate Structures (UTC) -Analysis of frames, trusses, columns, and continuous beams by force methods and slope deflection.
MicroStation                                   Frameworks MathCAD                                         Microsoft Office AWARDS Nominee for Eastern Operations People Development Award 2010 Eastern Operations Civil/Structural Engineer of the Year, 2008 002-O00-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                           Corporate, Base                                               Page 4 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Analysis of Plates and Shells (UTC) -Bending and buckling of plates and shells and non-linear analysis of cables and cable roof structures.
EcoNomicS Page 45 of 451
Computer Skills: STAADPro 2004 AutoCAD:
 
2000, 2004.MicroStation Frameworks MathCAD Microsoft Office AWARDS Nominee for Eastern Operations People Development Award 2010 Eastern Operations Civil/Structural Engineer of the Year, 2008 002-O00-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate, Base Page 4 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
WorleyParsons                                                                   Michael Gordon, P.E.
EcoNomicS Page 45 of 451 WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E.resources  
resources &energy                                                             Senior Supervising Engineer Resume:
& energy Senior Supervising Engineer Resume:  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Senior Supervising Engineer with over nineteen years of industry experience including stress analysis using Caesar II per AMSE B31 codes including both static and dynamic analysis, pipe support design, pipe material, and valve specifications for carbon steel, alloy steel, and fiber'reinforced plastics (FRP); and FRP pipe and tank design per NBS PS15-69, AMSE B31, and RTP-1.Experienced using Cameron Hydraulic and Crane 410 for pump calculations.
 
Worked as project engineer with projects ranging in size from $14 Million to $120 Million. Department manager responsible for both designers and engineers ranging from 25-33 staff members. Experienced in Pulp and Paper, Chemical, and Power Industries.
Senior Supervising Engineer with over nineteen years of industry experience including stress analysis using Caesar II per AMSE B31 codes including both static and dynamic analysis, pipe support design, pipe material, and valve specifications for carbon steel, alloy steel, and fiber' reinforced plastics (FRP); and FRP pipe and tank design per NBS PS15-69, AMSE B31, and RTP-1.
EXPERIENCE 2010 -Present Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) -Cholla Unit 2 Air Quality Control (AQC) Systems Project.Perform duties of the Owners Engineering Project Engineer on $120 MM baghouse and scrubber upgrade project including managing owners engineering resources to complete project procurement specifications for the installation of a new baghouse and retrofitting the existing Research-Cotrell scrubber to an open spray tower design.APS -Capital Budget Items. Lead a twelve-member multidiscipline team of engineers to develop Capital Budget Item packages for 40 projects to support the development of APS' 2012 capital spending plan.Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) -Sequoyah Fire Protection Pipe Support Project. Duties as Responsible Engineer include verification of quality-related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client.TVA -Watts Bar Unit 2 Project. Duties include Verification of Class I safety related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client.2010 Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Department of Energy -Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Duties included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3.Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic. Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant.
Experienced using Cameron Hydraulic and Crane 410 for pump calculations. Worked as project engineer with projects ranging in size from $14 Million to $120 Million. Department manager responsible for both designers and engineers ranging from 25-33 staff members. Experienced in Pulp and Paper, Chemical, and Power Industries.
2009 Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Florida Power and Light Projects.
EXPERIENCE 2010 - Present             Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) - Cholla Unit 2 Air Quality Control (AQC) Systems Project.
Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using AutoPIPE XM on boiler drain, attemperator spray, extraction steam, and condensate piping.Designed pipe supports for water circulation project using high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping above ground. Performed engineering calculations for span and thermal expansion.
Perform duties of the Owners Engineering Project Engineer on $120 MM baghouse and scrubber upgrade project including managing owners engineering resources to complete project procurement specifications for the installation of a new baghouse and retrofitting the existing Research-Cotrell scrubber to an open spray tower design.
Developed proposals for projects including both stress analysis and support design. Helped to refine WorleyParsons of Chattanooga's method for performing man-hour estimates for both stress analysis and pipe support design.002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
APS - Capital Budget Items. Lead a twelve-member multidiscipline team of engineers to develop Capital Budget Item packages for 40 projects to support the development of APS' 2012 capital spending plan.
EcoNomics Page 46 of 451 WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E.resources  
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Sequoyah Fire Protection Pipe Support Project. Duties as Responsible Engineer include verification of quality-related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client.
& energy Senior Supervising Engineer.... ..Resume 2008 Senior Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3. Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic.Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant.
TVA - Watts Bar Unit 2 Project. Duties include Verification of Class I safety related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client.
2007 -2008 Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, ALSTOM Power, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (33 engineers) included maintaining manpower database and work assignments, and insuring that mechanical activities are completed on time and to budget. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and front-end engineering (FEE) to support development of the project estimate.Coordinated the development of a Piping Group within the Mechanical Engineering Department.
2010                       Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Department of Energy - Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Duties included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3.
The group consisted of a Principal Piping Engineer and six support engineers.
Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic. Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant.
Developed training plan to bring new engineers up-to-speed on piping engineering including stress analysis, pipe supports, and pump calculations.
2009                       Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Florida Power and Light Projects. Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using AutoPIPE XM on boiler drain, attemperator spray, extraction steam, and condensate piping.
PSEG -Mercer and Hudson Back-end Technology (BET) Projects.
Designed pipe supports for water circulation project using high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping above ground. Performed engineering calculations for span and thermal expansion.
Project engineer for projects estimated at $70 million each in Alstom scope. Oversaw all aspects of work, which included managing the schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordinating multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews. Also facilitated all vendor meetings and responded to both field and vendor requests for information.
Developed proposals for projects including both stress analysis and support design. Helped to refine WorleyParsons of Chattanooga's method for performing man-hour estimates for both stress analysis and pipe support design.
2005 -2007 Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, Mesa Associates, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (25 designers and engineers) included maintaining manpower database, work assignments, and insuring that multi-discipline oversight is maintained on all projects.Responsible for training new engineers in the use of Caesar I1. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and FEE to support development of the project estimate.Performed stress analysis with Caesar II of package boiler steam and condensate piping per ASME B31.3 and boiler feed water piping per ASME B31.1. Included determining support location and selection.
002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                 Corporate Base                                               Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Huber Industries Waste Water Treatment Project. Project engineer on multiple projects including a wastewater treatment facility project estimated at $14 Million installed cost. Responsible for equipment selection and evaluation, development of process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID), management of schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordination of multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews.2001 -2005 Senior Mechanical Engineer -ALSTOM Power, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Design lead for environmental control system projects on the following fossil power plants: D- TVA -Cumberland, Kingston, Widows Creek, and Bull Run Plants v- Duke Power- Marshall, Cliffside, and Belews Creek Plant D Edison Power- Homer City Plant 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
EcoNomics Page 46 of 451
GcNomics Page 47 of 451 E WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E.resources
 
& energy Senior Supervising Engineer-~ Resume." ...... ... ........... .... ' : ? .:.: ." ....... ..... ... R e u m Duties included: t- Supporting the development of the project schedule, man-hour estimates, requesting staff as needed, writing equipment specifications, preparing bid evaluations, performing reviews of vendor engineering, and helping resolve questions from the erector.> Performing stress analysis of hot air systems (700 OF) per SMACNA Round Duct Specification, FRP piping per ASME B31.1 and NBS PS 15-69 for limestone slurry systems, and steam piping per ASME B31.1 using both Caesar II and hand calculations.
WorleyParsons                                                                   Michael Gordon, P.E.
Included the development of support arrangements and movements for the purchase of expansion joints.t Developing standard piping and valve specifications.
resources &energy                                                             Senior Supervising Engineer
Established method for performing stress analysis for fiberglass reinforced piping, and facilitated in-house training for piping designers.
                                                          ....   ..                                                   Resume 2008                     Senior Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3. Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic.
Also developed standard pipe support details to be used in piping design.2000 -2001 Design Engineer IV, Washington Group International, Birmingham, Alabama Corning Fiber Optic Plant. Designed various piping systems for industrial process facility using Microstation PDS 3D software.1992 -2000 Design Engineer II, BE & K Engineering, Birmingham, Alabama P- Piping design using PDMS, MicroStation, and AutoCAD. Duties included piping design, P&ID development, and 3D design of various types of process equipment and piping. Also experienced with Digital Photogrammetry.
Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant.
Most projects included pulp and paper and chemical process.p- Piping engineering included stress analysis of both FRP and carbon/alloy steel piping systems using Caesar I1. Included the analysis of steam piping, stock piping, and various other services.Duties also included determining pipe support location and types. Pump calculations performed using Cameron Hydraulics, Crane 410, and in-house developed program. Other duties included line sizing and PDMS catalog and specification development.
2007 - 2008               Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, ALSTOM Power, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (33 engineers) included maintaining manpower database and work assignments, and insuring that mechanical activities are completed on time and to budget. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and front-end engineering (FEE) to support development of the project estimate.
EDUCATION B.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Completed a Transfer Program in Pre-engineering, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Professional Registered Engineer, Tennessee SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES Piping Design using PDMS, PDS, Microstation, and AutoCAD*Bullet Proof Management by Crestcom, 2006 Nuclear Training for Un-escorted Badge, TVA, 1995 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Coordinated the development of a Piping Group within the Mechanical Engineering Department. The group consisted of a Principal Piping Engineer and six support engineers. Developed training plan to bring new engineers up-to-speed on piping engineering including stress analysis, pipe supports, and pump calculations.
EcoNomics Page 48 of 451 William E Sprinkle, Jr.Manager Nuclear Plant Shift Operations Watts Bar Nuclear" Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at WBN in 2008 (License No 22066)* Qualified Shift Manager at WBN in 2010* Currently filling position of Operations Support Superintendent.
PSEG - Mercer and Hudson Back-end Technology (BET) Projects. Project engineer for projects estimated at $70 million each in Alstom scope. Oversaw all aspects of work, which included managing the schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordinating multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews. Also facilitated all vendor meetings and responded to both field and vendor requests for information.
Previous experience: " Licensed Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 1995 -2001" Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 2001 -2005 Page 49 of 451 WorleyParsons Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources  
2005 - 2007               Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, Mesa Associates, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (25 designers and engineers) included maintaining manpower database, work assignments, and insuring that multi-discipline oversight is maintained on all projects.
& energy Structural Engineer Resume=~ ~~~~~~~~ .... ." ..." " ..... ... ...' .. ... ... .. : :. ..... .... ....... ... .. ...": ........ ... ....m "  
Responsible for training new engineers in the use of Caesar I1. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and FEE to support development of the project estimate.
Performed stress analysis with Caesar II of package boiler steam and condensate piping per ASME B31.3 and boiler feed water piping per ASME B31.1. Included determining support location and selection.
Huber Industries Waste Water Treatment Project. Project engineer on multiple projects including a wastewater treatment facility project estimated at $14 Million installed cost. Responsible for equipment selection and evaluation, development of process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID),
management of schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordination of multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews.
2001 - 2005               Senior Mechanical Engineer - ALSTOM Power, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Design lead for environmental control system projects on the following fossil power plants:
D- TVA - Cumberland, Kingston, Widows Creek, and Bull Run Plants v- Duke Power- Marshall, Cliffside, and Belews Creek Plant D Edison Power- Homer City Plant 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                 Corporate Base                                             Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
GcNomics Page 47 of 451
 
E             WorleyParsons                                                                               Michael Gordon, P.E.
Senior Supervising Engineer resources &energy
                                  * ." *..!* . ......
                                                * ........... .. * ..*.*.
                                                                      * ...                 ' :? .:.: . "*  .         ~ ....
                                                                                                                    . . ....
                                                                                                                      -        Resume R
                                                                                                                            ...e um Duties included:
t-   Supporting the development of the project schedule, man-hour estimates, requesting staff as needed, writing equipment specifications, preparing bid evaluations, performing reviews of vendor engineering, and helping resolve questions from the erector.
                          >   Performing stress analysis of hot air systems (700 OF) per SMACNA Round Duct Specification, FRP piping per ASME B31.1 and NBS PS 15-69 for limestone slurry systems, and steam piping per ASME B31.1 using both Caesar II and hand calculations. Included the development of support arrangements and movements for the purchase of expansion joints.
t   Developing standard piping and valve specifications. Established method for performing stress analysis for fiberglass reinforced piping, and facilitated in-house training for piping designers.
Also developed standard pipe support details to be used in piping design.
2000 - 2001               Design Engineer IV,Washington Group International, Birmingham, Alabama Corning Fiber Optic Plant. Designed various piping systems for industrial process facility using Microstation PDS 3D software.
1992   - 2000           Design Engineer II, BE & K Engineering, Birmingham, Alabama P- Piping design using PDMS, MicroStation, and AutoCAD. Duties included piping design, P&ID development, and 3D design of various types of process equipment and piping. Also experienced with Digital Photogrammetry. Most projects included pulp and paper and chemical process.
p- Piping engineering included stress analysis of both FRP and carbon/alloy steel piping systems using Caesar I1. Included the analysis of steam piping, stock piping, and various other services.
Duties also included determining pipe support location and types. Pump calculations performed using Cameron Hydraulics, Crane 410, and in-house developed program. Other duties included line sizing and PDMS catalog and specification development.
EDUCATION B.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Completed a Transfer Program in Pre-engineering, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Professional Registered Engineer, Tennessee SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES Piping Design using PDMS, PDS, Microstation, and AutoCAD*
Bullet Proof Management by Crestcom, 2006 Nuclear Training for Un-escorted Badge, TVA, 1995 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                             Corporate Base                                       Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
EcoNomics Page 48 of 451
 
William E Sprinkle, Jr.
Manager Nuclear Plant Shift Operations Watts Bar Nuclear
    " Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at WBN in 2008 (License No 22066)
* Qualified Shift Manager at WBN in 2010
* Currently filling position of Operations Support Superintendent.
Previous experience:
    " Licensed Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 1995 - 2001
    " Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 2001 - 2005 Page 49 of 451
 
WorleyParsons                                                                   Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources &energy                                                                                         Structural Engineer
          =~. ~~~~~~~~. ..... "." " .   ' .... ... .....
                                                        ... ... : :.... .             . . .. .. *. ... ....... ":
                                                                                                                *... .. ........
                                                                                                                            ....
                                                                                                                              ... Resume m "


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Structural Engineer with five years of experience with WorleyParsons.
 
Experience includes engineering and design of ductwork, duct support structures, foundations and retrofit, modification, and re-design of existing structures.
Structural Engineer with five years of experience with WorleyParsons. Experience includes engineering and design of ductwork, duct support structures, foundations and retrofit, modification, and re-design of existing structures. Experienced in managing multiple responsibilities in engineering delivery including the completion of calculation packages, design sketches, drawing mark-ups, final drawing reviews, budget proposals, and project meetings. Familiar with current code provisions, including but not limited to, AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code and Commentary, ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, and IBC (International Building Code). Familiar with current analysis and design software, which includes STAAD Pro, PCA Column, L-Pile, AutoCAD, SmartPlant Review, and other tools such as Microsoft Excel and MathCAD.
Experienced in managing multiple responsibilities in engineering delivery including the completion of calculation packages, design sketches, drawing mark-ups, final drawing reviews, budget proposals, and project meetings.
EXPERIENCE 2007 - Present Structural Engineer II,WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee.
Familiar with current code provisions, including but not limited to, AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code and Commentary, ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, and IBC (International Building Code). Familiar with current analysis and design software, which includes STAAD Pro, PCA Column, L-Pile, AutoCAD, SmartPlant Review, and other tools such as Microsoft Excel and MathCAD.EXPERIENCE 2007 -Present Structural Engineer II, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) -Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee.
Qualification of new and existing nuclear fire protection pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe support components, such as struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections. Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software. Software includes FAPPS (ME1 50),
Qualification of new and existing nuclear fire protection pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements.
BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DCA (Drawing Change Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support configurations and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database.
Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe support components, such as struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2, 1200 MW Unit, Spring City, Tennessee. Qualification of existing nuclear pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Design of modifications to existing pipe supports as required in order to meet specifications. Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe supports components, such as snubbers, struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections. Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software. Software includes FAPPS (ME150),
Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software.
BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DRA (Drawing Revision Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support modifications and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database.
Software includes FAPPS (ME1 50), BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DCA (Drawing Change Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support configurations and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database.Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) -Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2, 1200 MW Unit, Spring City, Tennessee.
Other responsibilities include checking and verification of pipe support calculation packages prior to issuance and coordination between multiple offices to ensure quality, completeness, and consistency.
Qualification of existing nuclear pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) - Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Avila Beach, California. Qualification of existing transformer foundations for seismic loading, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Design and qualification of transformer anchorage. Creation of supporting design calculation packages and sketches.
Design of modifications to existing pipe supports as required in order to meet specifications.
Georgia Power Company - Plant Scherer Units I and 2 (Booster Fan Outlet Ducts). Computer modeling, analysis, and design of pile cap foundations. Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches. Review of final foundation drawings.
Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe supports components, such as snubbers, struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections.
002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                     Corporate Base                                                   Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software.
EcaNomics Page 50 of 451
Software includes FAPPS (ME150), BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DRA (Drawing Revision Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support modifications and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database.Other responsibilities include checking and verification of pipe support calculation packages prior to issuance and coordination between multiple offices to ensure quality, completeness, and consistency.
 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) -Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Avila Beach, California.
IUJ                   WorleyParsons resources & energy Travis J. Hockenberry,       Structural Engineer              PE
Qualification of existing transformer foundations for seismic loading, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements.
  ... . . . . . . . . .   . ... * . ............                         ...                           . . . . . . .. ..
Design and qualification of transformer anchorage.
                                                                                                                        . .. .... ... ... . .... ...... Resume.
Creation of supporting design calculation packages and sketches.Georgia Power Company -Plant Scherer Units I and 2 (Booster Fan Outlet Ducts). Computer modeling, analysis, and design of pile cap foundations.
                                                                                                                                                        . . ....
Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches.
CPS Energy - Braunig Peaking Turbines Project. Computer modeling, analysis, and design of both soil and pile supported mat foundations. Analysis and design of small equipment foundations.
Review of final foundation drawings.002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Analysis and design of transformer containments and firewalls. Analysis and design of tank ring-wall foundations. Computer modeling, analysis, and design of steel pipe bridge and supporting foundations. Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches. Interfacing with client at design review meetings, updating project schedule, attending weekly meetings, review of final design drawings, and field support.
EcaNomics Page 50 of 451 IUJ WorleyParsons Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources
Alstom, Pacificorp - Ductwork Pressure Upgrade Study. Computer modeling and analysis of existing ductwork for increased pressure loads. Design of necessary modifications to existing ductwork and supports. Creation of calculation package, design sketches, and final study report issued to client.
& energy Structural Engineer Resume.... ............. * .............  
Alstom - Salt River Project, SOFA Upgrade for the Navajo Generating Station. Computer modeling of SOFA ductwork and new support steel. Analysis and design of ductwork and verification of results. Analysis of existing structural steel for additional load, which included modeling the existing structural steel. Design of necessary modifications to existing structural steel. Analysis of existing furnace buckstays for new load configuration and design of necessary modifications for inadequate members. Re-design of existing furnace guide for new location and loading. Creation of calculation package and design sketches.
... ........ .... ... .... ... ........ .... ..... .CPS Energy -Braunig Peaking Turbines Project. Computer modeling, analysis, and design of both soil and pile supported mat foundations.
Georgia Power Company - Plant Scherer Unit 4. Design steel support structure and pile cap foundations for ductwork. Responsibilities include computer modeling of support structure and ductwork. Analysis and design of support structure and verification of modeling results.
Analysis and design of small equipment foundations.
Determination of pile loads. Analysis and design of pile cap foundations. Preparation of design sketches.
Analysis and design of transformer containments and firewalls.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Bull Run Fossil Plant. Retrofit of existing handling facility weather enclosure. Responsibilities include computer modeling of existing weather enclosure. Verify need for modification to existing structure and propose and design modification to meet code requirements. Prepare design calculations and drawings.
Analysis and design of tank ring-wall foundations.
TVA - Cumberland Fossil Plant. LPA screen assembly and hopper addition. Responsibilities include verification of existing structural steel for additional load due to ash hopper and large particle ash (LPA) screen assembly. Design necessary modifications and prepare calculation package.
Computer modeling, analysis, and design of steel pipe bridge and supporting foundations.
TVA - Allen, Colbert, Cumberland, Widows Creek, and Paradise Fossil Plants. Foundation design and analysis. Responsibilities include analysis and design of concrete foundations for ammonia handling weather enclosures. Preparation of design calculations and design sketches.
Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches.
TVA - Cherokee Hydroelectric. Switchyard transformer replacement, bus support upgrade, and foundation modifications. Responsibilities include analysis and design of steel bus support structure, including modeling of structure and determination of loading. Verification and analysis of existing concrete foundations for new loading. Design of replacement foundations and modifications to existing foundations. Preparation of design calculations and design sketches.
Interfacing with client at design review meetings, updating project schedule, attending weekly meetings, review of final design drawings, and field support.Alstom, Pacificorp  
2005       - 2007                   Graduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the shear behavior of fiber reinforced concrete beams. Design and fabrication of 42 reinforced concrete beams with variations in geometry and reinforcement detail.
-Ductwork Pressure Upgrade Study. Computer modeling and analysis of existing ductwork for increased pressure loads. Design of necessary modifications to existing ductwork and supports.
Research aimed at determining the effects of combining steel fiber reinforcement with conventional transverse reinforcement.
Creation of calculation package, design sketches, and final study report issued to client.Alstom -Salt River Project, SOFA Upgrade for the Navajo Generating Station. Computer modeling of SOFA ductwork and new support steel. Analysis and design of ductwork and verification of results. Analysis of existing structural steel for additional load, which included modeling the existing structural steel. Design of necessary modifications to existing structural steel. Analysis of existing furnace buckstays for new load configuration and design of necessary modifications for inadequate members. Re-design of existing furnace guide for new location and loading. Creation of calculation package and design sketches.Georgia Power Company -Plant Scherer Unit 4. Design steel support structure and pile cap foundations for ductwork.
002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                             Corporate Base                                                                     Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Responsibilities include computer modeling of support structure and ductwork.
EcoNomics Page 51 of 451
Analysis and design of support structure and verification of modeling results.Determination of pile loads. Analysis and design of pile cap foundations.
 
Preparation of design sketches.Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) -Bull Run Fossil Plant. Retrofit of existing handling facility weather enclosure.
WorleyParsons                                                         Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources & energy                                                                      Structural Engineer Resume Teaching Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Prepared and presented lectures and tutorials for Steel and Concrete Member Design. Assisted students with course work as well as exam preparation. Prepared lab exercises for civil engineering surveying. Responsible for four sections of approximately 25 students.
Responsibilities include computer modeling of existing weather enclosure.
2004-2005                  Undergraduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the flexural behavior of fiber reinforced concrete. Designed and machined custom loading setup for specialized four-point bending tests. Fabricated and tested 120 concrete specimens, which included four-point bending, compression, and split tensile tests. Analyzed data obtained from testing. Co-authored publication, resulting from the research.
Verify need for modification to existing structure and propose and design modification to meet code requirements.
EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2007 B.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2005 REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Member of AISC, American Institute of Steel Construction Professional Engineer, State of Pennsylvania (PE078696)
Prepare design calculations and drawings.TVA -Cumberland Fossil Plant. LPA screen assembly and hopper addition.
PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS "Evaluation of Shear Capacity of Hooked Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with Stirrups,"
Responsibilities include verification of existing structural steel for additional load due to ash hopper and large particle ash (LPA) screen assembly.
Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, , 2007.
Design necessary modifications and prepare calculation package.TVA -Allen, Colbert, Cumberland, Widows Creek, and Paradise Fossil Plants. Foundation design and analysis.
Co-author, "Enhanced Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Low Volume Fractions," Indo-U.S. Conference Proceedings, Chennai, India, 2005.
Responsibilities include analysis and design of concrete foundations for ammonia handling weather enclosures.
002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                               Corporate Base                                              Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Preparation of design calculations and design sketches.TVA -Cherokee Hydroelectric.
EcoNomics Page 52 of 451
Switchyard transformer replacement, bus support upgrade, and foundation modifications.
 
Responsibilities include analysis and design of steel bus support structure, including modeling of structure and determination of loading. Verification and analysis of existing concrete foundations for new loading. Design of replacement foundations and modifications to existing foundations.
Phillip W. York, E.I.T.
Preparation of design calculations and design sketches.2005 -2007 Graduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the shear behavior of fiber reinforced concrete beams. Design and fabrication of 42 reinforced concrete beams with variations in geometry and reinforcement detail.Research aimed at determining the effects of combining steel fiber reinforcement with conventional transverse reinforcement.
  *WorleyParsons                                                                      Structural Engineering Associate resources &energy Resume
002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
EcoNomics Page 51 of 451 WorleyParsons resources
& energy Travis J. Hockenberry, PE Structural Engineer Resume 2004-2005 Teaching Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Prepared and presented lectures and tutorials for Steel and Concrete Member Design. Assisted students with course work as well as exam preparation.
Prepared lab exercises for civil engineering surveying.
Responsible for four sections of approximately 25 students.Undergraduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the flexural behavior of fiber reinforced concrete.
Designed and machined custom loading setup for specialized four-point bending tests. Fabricated and tested 120 concrete specimens, which included four-point bending, compression, and split tensile tests. Analyzed data obtained from testing. Co-authored publication, resulting from the research.EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2007 B.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2005 REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Member of AISC, American Institute of Steel Construction Professional Engineer, State of Pennsylvania (PE078696)
PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS"Evaluation of Shear Capacity of Hooked Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with Stirrups," Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, , 2007.Co-author, "Enhanced Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Low Volume Fractions," Indo-U.S. Conference Proceedings, Chennai, India, 2005.002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)
Corporate Base Page 3 EcoNomics Page 52 of 451  
*WorleyParsons resources
& energy Phillip W. York, E.I.T.Structural Engineering Associate Resume  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Structural Engineering Associate with over three years of experience in the structural and civil engineering fields including pipe support systems analysis and structural design.EXPERIENCE 2010 -Present 2011 2008 -2009 2007 -2008 E Structural Engineering
 
Structural Engineering Associate with over three years of experience in the structural and civil engineering fields including pipe support systems analysis and structural design.
EXPERIENCEE 2010 - Present            Structural Engineering Associate, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Brown's Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Athens, Alabama.
Assisted in identifying and locating electrical panels and components for cable identification in all fire safety related systems.
TVA - Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, Spring City, Tennessee. Conducted field walkdowns of piping layout and supports.
TVA- Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Hollywood, Alabama. Originated engineering analysis of pipe support systems including baseplates, structural steel, anchor bolts, welds, vendor components, and integral attachments.
2011                      Civil Engineer, Atwell Group, Charleston, Tennessee Verified field accuracy and installation of storm sewers and sewer structures compared with designed drawings.
2008    - 2009            Structural Engineer, March Adams & Associates, Chattanooga, Tennessee Assisted on structural design and
All items are painted and in good condition.
All items are painted and in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI UZ-- N/A[
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No significantcracks observed.
YN NEI- UOI N/A--YZ NEI U[-] N/A--YZ NEI UZ-- N/A[YI- NEI Uil N/AZ YN N[-- U-]3 Enter the equipment class name from" Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YI- NEI Uil N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 105 of 451 Equipment ID No. o-RE-090-0205-A Equip. ClasS3 0, Other Equipment Description MCR Emergency Air Intake Radiation Monitor Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN N[-- U-]
All items have adequate clearance.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from"Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No masonry black walls. No ceiling tiles present. Lights have safety cables. All items overhead are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flex type conduit. Top tube connection does not appear to be flexible enough. After further review, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
Page 105 of 451
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE-- N/AZ YZ NM U[- N/AZ YZ NEi UEI N/AZl YZ NEl UE-Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEI Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No.     o-RE-090-0205-A         Equip. ClasS3 0, Other Equipment Description MCR Emergency Air Intake Radiation Monitor Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UE-- N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NM U[- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry black walls. No ceiling tiles present. Lights have safety cables. All items overhead are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEi  UEI  N/AZl All electrical connections are flex type conduit. Top tube connection does not appearto be flexible enough. After furtherreview, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEl UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YI   NEI Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-10-2012 8-10-2012 Page 106 of 451 S t arus: YN NDý UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003 Equip. Class'Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Location:
Housekeeping is very good in this area.
Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-10-2012 Page 106 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St arus: YN NDý UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Observed (1) missing anchor bolt near pipe. This configuration is allowed per Note A of DWG 48N949.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003                 Equip. Class' Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Location: Bldg. RB                 Floor El. 716             Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y0 NEI UE- N/AI-Observed (1) missing anchor bolt nearpipe. This configurationis allowed per Note A of DWG 48N949.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI    UE- N/AEl oxidation?
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI UEF    N/AE3
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI UEI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YEI NED Y0 NEI UE- N/AI-YZ NEI UE- N/AEl YZ NEI UEF N/AE3 YEI NEI UEI N/AZ YZ NE- UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NE- UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 107 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003 Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 107 of 451
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NEI U-1 N/A--YN NEI UE- N/A[-1 YC9 N[-E UE- N/AE3 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003             Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI    U-1 N/A--
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI    UE- N/A[-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YC9 N[-E UE- N/AE3
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YM NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Congested area with some work in-progress.No areas for concern.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            9-17-2012 Page 108 of 451
 
Status:  Y  NEI UlI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 1-COND-031-0290-A                Equip. Class' Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit 1A-A Location: Bldg. AUX                  Floor El. 772            Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)              Ellis and Watts Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            Y[O NDI UE-D N/AD No observed bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YZ NDI    UD- N/AD1 oxidation?
Only mild surface oxidation was observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YZ NDI UD- N/AD No visible cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YDI NDl UD- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YZ NEI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 109 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. i-COND-03 1-0290-A          Equip. Class' Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit IA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YZ NEI UI1 N/AZ Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI U[:1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable trays rigidly mounted. No masonry block walls in the area.
Conduit is rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YZ NEI U[1 N/AEl Small metal pipe attached to bottom of condenser unit does not appearto have any flexibility. Pipe is condensate drain pan drain and does not affect operability of equipment.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UZ--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Duct sections located next to condenser appears to have adequate clearancesand utilizes expansion joints.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Congested area with some work in-progress.
Generalhousekeeping is good in this area.
No areas for concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 108 of 451 Status: Y NEI UlI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-COND-031-0290-A Equip. Class'Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit 1A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-13-2012 Page 110 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Ellis and Watts Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
St .tus: YE NEI   UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-PMCL-030-O176-B         Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 676           Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No observed bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.Y[O NDI UE-D N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Only mild surface oxidation was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 YZ NDI UD- N/AD YDI NDl UD- N/As YZ NEI UD-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YE NEI    U[-1 N/Al!
Page 109 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-COND-03 1-0290-A Equip. Class'Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit IA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All hardware/anchorsin place and in good condition.
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE NEI UI- N/AL!
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
Cable trays rigidly mounted. No masonry block walls in the area.Conduit is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Small metal pipe attached to bottom of condenser unit does not appear to have any flexibility.
Pipe is condensate drain pan drain and does not affect operability of equipment.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UI1 N/AZ YO NEI U[:1 N/AZl YZ NEI U[1 N/AEl YZ NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Duct sections located next to condenser appears to have adequate clearances and utilizes expansion joints.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 110 of 451 S t.tus: YE NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMCL-030-O176-B Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Location:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y'-- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware/anchors in place and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Mild surface corrosion present, but not significant.
Mild surface corrosion present, but not significant.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI    U-- N/All
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE- N[-- UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YE NEI U[-1 N/Al!YE NEI UI- N/AL!YZ NEI U-- N/All YE- N[-- UI- N/AE Y NE-I UL-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y    NE-I UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 111 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-PMCL-030-0 176-B Equip. Class'Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Room Cooler Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Pipe nearby with 1" clearance and minimum 2" insulation (credible but not significant).
Page 111 of 451
YZ NEI U[I N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. i-PMCL-030-0 176-B           Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Room Cooler Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI  U[I N/A[
Pipe nearby with 1"clearance and minimum 2" insulation (credible but not significant).
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[   NEI U-   N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.
Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached piping has flexible hose/fittings.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NWI UW- N/AZ1 Attached piping has flexible hose/fittings. Conduit has flexible connections.
Conduit has flexible connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS N[,] UW-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NWI UW- N/AZ1 YS N[,] UW-Other Adverse Conditions
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NWI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NWI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 112 of 451 Status: YE N- UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A Equip. Class'Equipment Description ERCW Strainer 1A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012 Page 112 of 451
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area /I10, WBN-WB-0 I1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
P.X. Engiineerinq Co.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE N-   UI-]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Nothing is missing or bent, broken, etc.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A                 Equip. Class' Equipment Description ERCW Strainer 1A-A Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 722           Room, Area /I10, WBN-WB-0 I1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               P.X. Engiineerinq Co.
Significant surface corrosion, however base material is intact.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Verified per DWG 38N219.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie
Poor housekeeping, extremely wet environment, and neglected paint. Significant surface corrosion.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Still should meet seismic requirements.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YO NEI Ur- N/A[]
YO NEI Ur- N/A[]YN NEI UiL N/Ar--YEI NEI Ur] N/A[-1 YED NEIl U- N/Ar-YED NEI U'-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Nothing is missing or bent, broken, etc.
Page 113 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description ERCW Strainer lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YN NEI UiL N/Ar--
Scaffolding on pressure boundary bolts. There are several areas of concern. They are credible, but not significant.
oxidation?
(1) Drain pipe to scaffolding, (2) Pipe valve water operator to scaffolding, (3) top cover plate bolts to scaffolding, (4) pipe valve in the vertical to the scaffolding.
Significantsurface corrosion,however base materialis intact.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YEI NEI Ur] N/A[-1 No observed cracks
Significant Appendix R scaffolding is in place and has ample restraint to the building.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YED NEIl U- N/Ar-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No masonry walls present. Conduit is rigidly supported.
Verified per DWG 38N219.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YED NEI U'-
Tubing has adequate flexibility.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Poor housekeeping, extremely wet environment, and neglected paint. Significantsurface corrosion. Still should meet seismic requirements.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 113 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A               Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description ERCW Strainer lA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?           YN NEI U-1 N/AZ Scaffolding on pressure boundary bolts. There are several areas of concern. They are credible, but not significant.(1) Drain pipe to scaffolding, (2) Pipe valve water operatorto scaffolding, (3) top cover plate bolts to scaffolding, (4) pipe valve in the vertical to the scaffolding.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,       Y[  NEI U[:] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
SignificantAppendix R scaffolding is in place and has ample restraintto the building. No masonry walls present. Conduit is rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                   Y[  NEI U-1 N/A-1 All electrical connections are flexible. Tubing has adequate flexibility.
Piping is rigidly supported.
Piping is rigidly supported.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-1 N/AZ Y[ NEI U[:] N/AZ Y[ NEI U-1 N/A-1 YE NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free           YE  NEI  U--
All components are rigidly supported and guided.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Housekeeping is poor in this area. Significant degradation of protective coatings has occurred.Significant surface corrosion is present. Scaffolding is in direct contact with the equipment.
Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could           YZ NEI   UZ--
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-24-2012 7-24-2012 Page 114 of 451 s t a t us: Y[I NO UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine 1A 1 Start Air Receiver A Location:
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
All components are rigidly supported and guided.
McDaniel Tank Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Housekeeping is poorin this area. Significant degradationof protective coatings has occurred.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Loose nut on bottom south anchor strap. Missing washer on bottom north anchor strap.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Significant surface corrosionis present. Scaffolding is in direct contact with the equipment.
Corrosion observed on south bottom anchor washer, surface corrosion only.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Bolted to steel frame attached to diesel engine skid.5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                       Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                  7-24-2012 Page 114 of 451
 
s t a t us: Y[I NO UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A                 Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine 1A 1 StartAir Receiver A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742             Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               McDaniel Tank Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YEl- N        UEI] N/AEl Loose nut on bottom south anchorstrap. Missing washer on bottom north anchor strap.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NEI UE- N/AF-1 oxidation?
Corrosion observed on south bottom anchorwasher, surface corrosion only.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEIl U[- N/AEl Bolted to steel frame attached to diesel engine skid.
: 5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NEl U-] N/A--
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs C80-0277-1 and 6036C07004.
Verified per DWGs C80-0277-1 and 6036C07004.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YI- NED UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI YEl- N UEI] N/AEl YO NEI UE- N/AF-1 YO NEIl U[- N/AEl YO NEl U-] N/A--YI- NED UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 115 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine IA 1 Start Air Receiver A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 115 of 451
YED NEI U-- N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ ND-] UD- N/AD YN NEI Ur-Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A           Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine IA 1 StartAir Receiver A Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NDI UD-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YED NEI U-- N/ADI
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ ND-] UD- N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NDI UD-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Receiver factory steel name plate is loose on the sides. Could be a personnel hazard.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-17-2012 7-17-2012 Page 116 of 451 Status: YE NEI UII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-213-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board 1A 1-1 Location:
Receiver factory steel name plate is loose on the sides. Could be a personnel hazard.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A851, WBN-WB-030 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-17-2012 Page 116 of 451
ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YE NEI UII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YE- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in good condition.
Equipment ID No.         1-MCC-213-AOO1-A         Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board 1A 1-1 Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A851, WBN-WB-030 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appears to be 1/4"- 5/16"' Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one     YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YO NEI ULI N/A[1 All anchorageis in good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appearsto be 1/4"- 5/16"' Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YZ NE ULI N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces are painted. There is minor surface corrosion.
All surfaces are painted. There is minor surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?There are no credible cracks. All appear to be legacy typical cracking for a floor.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?         YE NI-- U-] N/AEl There are no credible cracks. All appearto be legacy typical cracking for a floor.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic .conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?               YZI NEI UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YO NEI ULI N/A[1 YZ NE ULI N/AZ YE NI-- U-] N/AEl YZI NEI UZ N/AZ YE N--1 UD 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YE N--1 UD potentially adverse seismic .conditions?
Page 117 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-213-AOOI-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board IA 1-I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Several support structures are in close proximity to flexible conduit connections.
Page 117 of 451
However, they have adequate clearance.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-213-AOOI-A           Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board IA 1-I Interaction Effects
Lights are safety chained. No masonry walls present. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[  NEI U-- N/AE-Several support structures are in close proximity to flexible conduit connections. However, they have adequate clearance.
No ceiling tiles in the area. No Masonry block walls.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit connections are flexible type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI U-- N/AE-YN NE-1 UEr N/AZ YZ NE-1 U[-I N/AZI YZ NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE-1 UEr    N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Lights are safety chained. No masonry walls present. All overhead items are rigidly supported. No ceiling tiles in the area. No Masonry block walls.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE-1 U[-I N/AZI All conduit connections are flexible type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping barricades in the area for work in progress.
Housekeeping barricadesin the area for work in progress. No adverse seismic conditions.
No adverse seismic conditions.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-3-2012 Page 118 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-3-2012 8-3-2012 Page 118 of 451 Sta t us: YN NE-1 UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A I-A Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Sta t us: YN NE-1 UL--
ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-MCC-214-AOO1-A         Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A I-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one     YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 YN NEI U-] N/AE Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition. No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure. Frontpanels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 YNI NEI UE- N/AEJ oxidation?
Clean and painted (minor chipping).
Clean and painted (minor chipping).
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete or damage.YN NEI U-] N/AE YNI NEI UE- N/AEJ YED NEI UI- N/AE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?         YED NEI UI- N/AE No visible cracks in concrete or damage.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?               Yf- NEI U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yf- NEI U-- N/AZ YN NE1 Ur-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YN NE1 Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 119 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Overhead lighting restrained with safety chain/wire.
Page 119 of 451
Local emergency light restrained adequately.
 
YZ NEI U[I N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[E U'I N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No.     1-MCC-214-AOO1-A       Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects
Cable tray and piping rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U[I N/A[
All in good working condition.
Overhead lighting restrainedwith safety chain/wire. Local emergency light restrainedadequately.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections through top of cabinet are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/AEl Yl NEI UEi Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[E U'I N/A[]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE1 UE[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray and piping rigidly supported.All in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UE- N/AEl All electricalconnections through top of cabinet are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Yl  NEI UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NE1 UE[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is clean and orderly. Temporary rolling scaffolding noted previously in area walk-by still in same condition tied-off in 1 spot instead of 2.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 120 of 451 Sta t us: YN NEI1 ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Location:
Generalhousekeeping is clean and orderly. Temporary rolling scaffolding noted previously in area walk-by still in same condition tied-off in 1 spot instead of 2.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-26-2012 Page 120 of 451
ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Sta t us: YN NEI1 ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YEI N[E 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition.
Equipment ID No.         1-MCC-214-AO02-A         Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YEI N[E of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 YED NEI UL] N/A[l Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition. No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure. Frontpanels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
Some chipped paint. Mild surface corrosion.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 YED NEI UE-1 N/AZl oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significant observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Some chippedpaint. Mild surface corrosion.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?         YZ NEI UEl N/AZ Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significant observed.
YED NEI UL] N/A[l YED NEI UE-1 N/AZl YZ NEI UEl N/AZ Y[-] NEI UE] N/AZ YO NE] U[]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?               Y[-] NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 121 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YO NE] U[]
All items appear to have adequate clearance.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All items above are rigidly mounted.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 121 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AO02-A           Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS N[Z] UD1 N/AZ All items appearto have adequate clearance.All items above are rigidly mounted.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE-Z UI] N/AZ-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All items above are rigidly supported.
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All items above are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS N[Z] UD1 N/AZ YN NE-Z UI] N/AZ-YS N[Z] U-- N/AZ YS NEJ U[-.Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS N[Z] U-- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NEJ U[-.
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE N[-] U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-8-2012 8-8-2012 Page 122 of 451 S t atus: YN N[-] Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board 1A 1-A Location:
Housekeeping is good.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D204, WBN-WB-031 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-8-2012 Page 122 of 451
ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YN N[-] Ur-]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?MCC is welded to embed plates (visually observed on outside of MCC only). No observed issues. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A                 Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board 1A 1-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 760           Room, Area D204, WBN-WB-031 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Mild chipping of paint is present with mild surface corrosion.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No adverse seismic conditions.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one     YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracking observed.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YE NEI UI- N/ALE MCC is welded to embed plates (visually observed on outside of MCC only). No observed issues. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.
Floor cracking at the embeds is present but typical for this arrangement.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 YO NEI Ur] N/ALl oxidation?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Mild chipping of paint is present with mild surface corrosion. No adverse seismic conditions.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YO NEI U[-] N/A[]
YEI NO YE NEI UI- N/ALE YO NEI Ur] N/ALl YO NEI U[-] N/A[]Y-- NO-- U-] N/A[YO NEI- Ur 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No significantcracking observed. Floor cracking at the embeds is present but typical for this arrangement.
Page 123 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             Y-- NO-- U-] N/A[
All connections and switches on the front of the MCC are clear of impact.YE NE-1 U[-] N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YMI NEI Uli N/AZI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YO NEI-Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 123 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A           Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NE-1 U[-] N/AZ All connections and switches on the front of the MCC are clear of impact.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YMI NEI   Uli N/AZI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Reinforced masonry block wall is present and in good condition.
Reinforced masonry block wall is present and in good condition.
Overhead temperature sensor TS-13-132B does not have a safety cable (housekeeping).
Overhead temperature sensor TS-13-132B does not have a safety cable (housekeeping). All else looks good.
All else looks good.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are all flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UEI N/AZl YN NEI UEZ Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UEI N/AZl Electricalconnections are all flexible conduit type.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UEZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YE NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in the area is good.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-6-2012 Page 124 of 451
 
Sa,.,s: Y-I NO U--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B                    Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board lB-B Location: Bldg. AUX                  Floor El. 772            Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)              ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                YN NEI UL] N/All All anchorage is in good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appearsto be 1/4"- 5/16". Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                YN NEI UI- N/AEl oxidation?
Painted with some minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?        YE NEI UE- N/AZl No observed cracking >0.5mm near embed plate. Cracking present typical of concrete floor, nothing of significance or concern.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?              YE] NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                YN NO U--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 125 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B              Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board 1B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YDI NZ U-1 N/A[-]
Cap plate of cable tray support in contact with conduit collar on top of cabinet (Panel8).
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI    Ur- N/AD.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition. Lighting has safety chain/wire. (One light previously noted in walk-by does not have safety chain.)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YN NDI UDI N/AD1 Conduit connections on top of MCC cabinet are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    Y-I NS UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YM NDI UD--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No temporary equipment or scaffolding in immediate vicinity (within 5 ft)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in the area is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 124 of 451 Sa,.,s: Y-I NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board lB-B Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-3-2012 Page 126 of 451
ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
S t .a.u: Y[ NEI1 UL-]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in good condition.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO01-A                   Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appears to be 1/4"- 5/16". Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y[W NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Painted with some minor chipping.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI U[] N/A[Z Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
No observed corrosion.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI UW- N/AZl oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracking >0.5mm near embed plate. Cracking present typical of concrete floor, nothing of significance or concern.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NEI UL] N/All YN NEI UI- N/AEl YE NEI UE- N/AZl YE] NEI UE- N/AZ YN NO U--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 125 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board 1B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Cap plate of cable tray support in contact with conduit collar on top of cabinet (Panel 8).YDI NZ U-1 N/A[-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI Ur- N/AD.and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition.
Lighting has safety chain/wire. (One light previously noted in walk-by does not have safety chain.)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit connections on top of MCC cabinet are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NDI UDI N/AD1 Y-I NS UD1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NDI UD--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No temporary equipment or scaffolding in immediate vicinity (within 5 ft)Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-3-2012 8-3-2012 Page 126 of 451 S t.a.u: Y[ NEI1 UL-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO01-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Location:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y[W NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Welds painted and observed bolts in good condition.
Welds painted and observed bolts in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in weld.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE    NEI UW- N/AZ No visible cracks in weld.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI U-      N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Y    NZlU[--
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI U[] N/A[Z YO NEI UW- N/AZl YE NEI UW- N/AZ YZ NEI U- N/A Y NZlU[--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 127 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 127 of 451
Clearance of -5' maintained around cabinet.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AOO1-A         Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NEI  UM N/AZ Clearance of -5' maintainedaround cabinet.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Piping and cable tray rigidly supported and in good working condition.
Piping and cable tray rigidly supported and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached conduit is rigidly supported, cables free to move inside. All other have flexible connections.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UE- N/AZ Attached conduit is rigidly supported, cables free to move inside. All other have flexible connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NEI UM N/AZ YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 YN NEI UE- N/AZ YN NEJ UZ-Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEJ UZ-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UrZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
Doors closed, no missing bolts or panels. Scaffolding located near south end of cabinet. Appears to be supported properly/adequately.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NEI UrZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Doors closed, no missing bolts or panels. Scaffolding located near south end of cabinet.Appears to be supportedproperly/adequately.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Phillip York Date: 7-18-2012 7-18-2012 9-28-2012 Page 128 of 451 S Y ND UI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-18-2012 Phillip York                                                            9-28-2012 Page 128 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S       Y   ND UI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoragze
Equipment ID No.         1-BD-212-AO02-A           Equip. Class3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and BreakerPanels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoragze
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE NEI UE- N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE N[-1 UE- N/AZ oxidation?
All surface painted and in good condition.
All surface painted and in good condition. No corrosionobserved.
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed of significance.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI    UE N/AZ No cracks observed of significance. Cracks typical for a concrete floor.
Cracks typical for a concrete floor.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NE U[-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YS NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No areas of concern.YE NO YE NEI UE- N/AZ YE N[-1 UE- N/AZ YE NEI UE N/AZ YE NE U[-1 N/AZ YS NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No areas of concern.
Page 129 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltaqe Switch qear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Good clearance.
Page 129 of 451
YZ NEI UI- N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD NEI UM- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Lights are safely chained. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles.Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported.
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO02-A             Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltaqe Switchqearand Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE! UI N/AZ YZ NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UI- N/A-Good clearance.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UFZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD NEI UM- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safely chained. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles.
Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE! UI      N/AZ Conduit connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UFZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
New scaffolding in the area added since WBN-WB-003 was completed.
New scaffolding in the area added since WBN-WB-003 was completed. The scaffolding is adequately restrained.Also observed a sprinklerhead touching HVAC Duct Insulation. Duct and pipes are both rigidly supported and of no concern.
The scaffolding is adequately restrained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-3-2012 Phillip York                                                            9-28-2012 Page 130 of 451
Also observed a sprinkler head touching HVAC Duct Insulation.
 
Duct and pipes are both rigidly supported and of no concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Phillip York Date: 8-3-2012 8-3-2012 9-28-2012 Page 130 of 451 YN N[-- U[1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BOO1-B Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board IBI-B Location:
Sta*t.: YN N[-- U[1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BOO1-B                   Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgearand Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board IBI-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI  NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YEI NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UE] N/AZ Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YU NEI UE- N/AZ3 oxidation?
Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.
Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal cracks observed in the floor near the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI U[:] N/AZ Normal cracks observed in the floor near the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE[  NEI UE] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YO NEI UE] N/AZ YU NEI UE- N/AZ3 YZ NEI U[:] N/AZ YE[ NEI UE] N/AE YO NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI UE]
Page 131 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BOO1-B Equip. Class 3 2. Low Voltaqe Switchqear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1BI-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Soft targets are all clear of objects. All items in the area are well restrained.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 131 of 451
 
Equipment ID No.     1-BD-212-BOO1-B         Equip. Class 3 2. Low Voltaqe Switchqear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1BI-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YED NI- UE- N/AZ Soft targets are all clearof objects. All items in the area are well restrained.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NI- UE- N/AZ YN NEI U-- N/AZ Y[D NE-- U-- N/AZ YZ NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y[D NE-- U-- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NEI U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is significant scaffolding in the area. It looks to have adequate clearance and is well restrained.
There is significant scaffolding in the area. It looks to have adequate clearance and is well restrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-9-2012 8-9-2012 9-28-2012 Phillio York Page 132 of 451 S t atus: YZ NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BO02-B Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Location:
Housekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-9-2012 Phillio York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 132 of 451
Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YZ NO U--
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BO02-B                   Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area   WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEI    UE- N/AE3 Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NE] UE] N/AE3 oxidation?
Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.
Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking observed at the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YER NEI    UE] N/AZl Normal floor cracking observed at the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI UE] N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YN NEI UE- N/AE3 YN NE] UE] N/AE3 YER NEI UE] N/AZl YEI NEI UE] N/A2 YN NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN NEI    UE]
Page 133 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BO02-B Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switch-gear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All items in the area are well restrained and soft targets have adequate clearance.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 133 of 451
 
Equipment ID No.     1-BD-212-BO02-B         Equip. Class3 2, Low Voltage Switch-gear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-1 All items in the area are well restrainedand soft targets have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI    UEJ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-1 YN NEI UEJ N/AZ YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ YE NEI U[Z Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YZ NEI    U-1 N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI U[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YS NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it all has acceptable clearance and restraint.
There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it all has acceptable clearance and restraint.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 9-28-2012 Phillio York Page 134 of 451 S t atus: YZ NE1 ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-A-A_Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltaqe Switchqear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board IA-A Location:
Housekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-9-2012 Phillio York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 134 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YZ   NE1 ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YID NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections.
Equipment ID No.         1-BD-21 1-A-A_            Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltaqe Switchqear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board IA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
All bolts present and in good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YID NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI      U[-' N/Al All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEI      UF  N/AZ oxidation?
No observed corrosion.
No observed corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NO U-I N/AF No visible cracks in concrete.
Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG1 1846.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YS NEI Ur N/AF-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YZ NEI U[-' N/Al YN NEI UF N/AZ YN NO U-I N/AF YS NEI Ur N/AF-1 YN NO U-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG1 1846.
Page 135 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
In close proximity to Reactor Coolant Pump Pot XFMR and Relay Panel. Appears to have adequate clearance to allow for differential displacement.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Credible but not significant.
Page 135 of 451
Light near 1-BKR-68-341A does not have safety chain/wire, but associated conduit/wire would prevent it from falling..YO NEI U--1 N/AI-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE No U-- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-A-A           Equip. Class3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     . YO NEI U--1 N/AI-In close proximity to Reactor Coolant Pump Pot XFMR and Relay Panel.Appears to have adequate clearance to allow for differential displacement. Credible but not significant. Light near 1-BKR-68-341A does not have safety chain/wire, but associatedconduit/wire would prevent it from falling.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE No U-- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead conduit, piping, and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition.
Overhead conduit, piping, and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached electrical lines are made with flexible connections.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NWI UW1 N/AW--
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NWI UW1 N/AW--YZ NEI U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
Attached electricallines are made with flexible connections.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWI UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YZ NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Temporary scaffolding near cabinet appears to be adequately restrained to prevent seismic interaction.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NWI     UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Temporary scaffolding near cabinet appears to be adequately restrainedto prevent seismic interaction.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is clean and orderly. Rolling scaffolding in front of cabinet is tied-off appropriately with 2 chains and wheel stops are engaged.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 9-28-2012 Phillio York Page 136 of 451  
Generalhousekeeping is clean and orderly. Rolling scaffolding in front of cabinet is tied-off appropriatelywith 2 chains and wheel stops are engaged.
.status: Y[Z NEI UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-211-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1B-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-26-2012 Phillio York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 136 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
                                                                                          .status: Y[Z NEI UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-211-B-B                     Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All bolts present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YED NEI    UE- N/A[-]
No significant cracking observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.
Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCG1 1846.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NO UI- N/AE-oxidation?
YO NEI YED NEI UE- N/A[-]YO NO UI- N/AE-YN NEI UE- N/AE YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 YO NEI U[-1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No corrosion observed.
Page 137 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-B-B Equip. Class 3 3. Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1-B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NEI UE- N/AE Normal floor cracking. No significant cracking observed.
All items have adequate clearance.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCG1 1846.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 137 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-B-B               Equip. Class 3 3. Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1-B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YI    NO UE1 N/All All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NCI UEI      N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YI    Nn UE1 N/AEI All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
YI NO UE1 N/All YS NCI UEI N/AEI YI Nn UE1 N/AEI YN NCi UI-Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NCi      UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE-- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NE-- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-8-2012 8-8-2012 9-28-2012 Phillip York Page 138 of 451 S t atus: YN N[-- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium VoltaQe Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-8-2012 Phillip York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 138 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St atus: YN N[-- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A                     Equip. Class 3 3, Medium VoltaQe Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Y[ NZl 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All bolts present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y[    NZl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significant observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI U-] N/AE[
Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG 11846.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.
YO NEI U-] N/AE[YE NEI UE- N/A[-YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE YO NEI U[] N/A[]YO NEI U-1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE    NEI UE- N/A[-
Page 139 of 451 Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
All items appear to have adequate clearance.
No corrosion observed.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significantobserved.
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead electrical is rigidly supported.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NEI U[] N/A[]
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE- N/AZI YED NEI U-I N/AI-YZ NEI UW- N/AZI YN NEI- U-I Other Adverse Conditions
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[W] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG 11846.
Observed scaffolding in the immediate area-well restrained.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI    U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Also work-in-progress-cables entering the back of the cabinet. Panels are bolted lower than normal.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
Page 139 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A               Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UE- N/AZI All items appearto have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI    U-I N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.All overhead electricalis rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UW- N/AZI All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI- U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS N[W] U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Observed scaffolding in the immediate area-wellrestrained.Also work-in-progress-cablesentering the back of the cabinet. Panels are bolted lower than normal.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 9-28-2012 PhiiD York Page 140 of 451 S t atus: YI N[:] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-BD-211-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-8-2012 PhiiD York                                                                9-28-2012 Page 140 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St atus: YI N[:] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 2-BD-211-B-B                     Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YN NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All bolts present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking is present. No significant cracking observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEI Ur- N/A--
Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCGI 1846.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.
YN NEI Ur- N/A--YZ NEI Ur-1 N/A[-Y[ NEI U[-1 N/AEl YN NIZ UF- N/AEl YN NEI U[-1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI Ur-1 N/A[-
Page 141 of 451 Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
All items have adequate clearance.
No corrosion observed.
Y[ NEI Ur1 N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr-] Ur-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y[    NEI U[-1 N/AEl Normal floor cracking is present. No significant cracking observed.
No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YN NIZ UF- N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained.
Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCGI 1846.
YZ NW UE- N/AZI YE NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Also work-in-progress-cables are inserted into the back of several cabinets with the cover panels bolted in a lower position.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Page 141 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-B-B               Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y[  NEI Ur1 N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr-] Ur-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.
All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YZ NW UE- N/AZI All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Also work-in-progress-cablesare inserted into the back of several cabinets with the cover panels bolted in a lower position.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 9-28-2012 Phillit York Page 142 of 451 Status: YE N[-] UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-8-2012 Phillit York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 142 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Federal Pacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE N[-] UI--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Yr- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
Equipment ID No.         1-DXF-237-A               Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All hardware present.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces painted or galvanized.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yr- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI U-] N/A[[
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. All hardwarepresent.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE Nl[    U-] N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces painted or galvanized. No corrosionobserved.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ* NE-1 U[[] N/A[[]
No visible cracks.
Y[[ NEI U[[ N/AZ
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YZ NEI U      N]
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NEI U-] N/A[[YE Nl[ U-] N/AZNE-1 U[[] N/A[[]Y[[ NEI U[[ N/AZ YZ NEI U N]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 143 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer IA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 143 of 451
The only soft targets are the connections and they have adequate clearance.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-A                 Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer IA Interaction Effects
Lights are safely chained. All conduit is rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YZ NEI      U-1 N/AZl The only soft targets are the connections and they have adequate clearance.
No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible conduit is in place.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U-1 N/AZl YZ NEI UI- N/AL!YN NEl UI- N/AZ1 YZ NEI UZ Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YZ NEI UI- N/AL!
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safely chained. All conduit is rigidly supported.No masonry walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NEl UI- N/AZ1 Flexible conduit is in place.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YZ NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NEI     UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good. There is a lot of scaffolding in the room, but it all has good clearance and well restrained.
Housekeeping is very good. There is a lot of scaffolding in the room, but it all has good clearanceand well restrained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 144 of 451 s t arts: YE ND- UEJ1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                 8-3-2012 Page 144 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A803, WBN-WB-039 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Federal Pacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
s t arts: YE ND- UEJ1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-DXF-237-B               Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A803, WBN-WB-039 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YE NED 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All items are present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
All items are painted and in good condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YN NEI UE- N/AZ All items are present and in good condition.
No corrosion observed.Minor corrosion observed at the grounding connection.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YED NEI UE N/AZ oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All items are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Minor corrosion observed at the grounding connection.
YN NEI UE- N/AZ YED NEI UE N/AZ YO NE UE1 N/AZl YE] NE UE N/AN YS NEI UEI 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NE UE1 N/AZl No cracks observed.
Page 145 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer lB Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE] NE UE N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Scaffolding is in close proximity to 4" connection.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YS NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Scaffold is well restrained and should not be a problem. (1" clearance)
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
YN NEI U[-i N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 145 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-B                 Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer lB Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI U[-i    N/AZ Scaffolding is in close proximity to 4" connection. Scaffold is well restrainedand should not be a problem. (1" clearance)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI   NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-E U[-- N/AZ YM NE-I Ur Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ N[-E U[-- N/AZ Electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YM NE-I Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequate restraint.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NEI U--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequaterestraint.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 146 of 451 S t a t us: YO NE] UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-O001 Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Samplingj Power XFMR Location:
Housekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-8-2012 Page 146 of 451
Federal Pacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
S t a t us: YO   NE] UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-O001                   Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Samplingj Power XFMR Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A             = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YN NE-I UE- N/A[Z YE NEI UE-I N/AZ YN NE UE- N/AZ-YEI NE-- UE- N/AZ YN N[E UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YN NE-I UE- N/A[Z
Page 147 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-0001 Equip. Class 3 4. Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Sampling Power XFMR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE NEI          UE-I N/AZ oxidation?
Nearby conduit rigidly connected.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NE UE- N/AZ-
YZ NEI ULI N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion?         YEI    NE-- UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN N[E UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 147 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-0001               Equip. Class3 4. Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Sampling Power XFMR Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI ULI N/AZ Nearby conduit rigidly connected.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.
Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NE] UE-1 N/AZ YED NEI U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NE] UE-1 N/AZ
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YED NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
No adverse seismic conditions observed.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Other Adverse Conditions
Good housekeeping, no temporary equipment nearby.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 148 of 451 str..o: YE NE] U0Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341A-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Location:
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UZ--
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
No adverse seismic conditions observed.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Good housekeeping, no temporary equipment nearby.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012 Page 148 of 451
 
str..o: YE NE]   U0Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         1-OXF-068-0341A-A         Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 782           Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEi  U-- N/A--
Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI UE- N/AF' oxidation?
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ N[-] UEI N/AZ
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE- NEI U[] N/A[
YO NO YO NEi U-- N/A--YZ NEI UE- N/AF'YZ N[-] UEI N/AZ YE- NEI U[] N/A[YO NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 149 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-OXF-068-034 A-A Equip. Class 3 4. Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO N[] UI- N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NEI UL- N/AZ 10.I Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
Page 149 of 451
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. i-OXF-068-034 A-A           Equip. Class3 4. Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO N[] UI- N/A[l
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UL- N/AZ 10.IBased on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YM NEI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 9-17-2012 9-17-2012 Page 150 of 451 St.a.t: YE NEI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 1D Transformer Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              9-17-2012 Page 150 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St.a.t: YE NEI U-]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F                   Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 1D Transformer Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 782             Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           Y[D NEI UE- N/AE Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YN NEI UE- N/AD oxidation?
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UE3 N/AZ3
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YEI NEI  U[E N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YE- NE Y[D NEI UE- N/AE YN NEI UE- N/AD YO NEI UE3 N/AZ3 YEI NEI U[E N/A2NO UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y* NO UE]
Page 151 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 10 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NI- UI- N/ACl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOI Urn N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE- U- N/Al]YN Nr- uE Other Adverse Conditions
Page 151 of 451
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ul-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F             Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 10 Transformer Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NI- UI- N/ACl
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI   NOI Urn N/A[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE- U-      N/Al]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN Nr- uE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI   Ul-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 152 of 451 S t a t us: YZ NE- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               9-17-2012 Page 152 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A856, WBN-WB-018 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t at us: YZ NE- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-AO02-A                 Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A856, WBN-WB-018 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YZ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All viewable hardware is in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
All surfaces are painted and in reasonably good condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YED NlI UE] N/AZ All viewable hardware is in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NCI UEI N/A[-
oxidation?
All surfaces are painted and in reasonablygood condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YED NEI UE- N/A[l No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YED NEI UEr      N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.
Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YN NO UE]
YED NlI UE] N/AZ YZ NCI UEI N/A[-YED NEI UE- N/A[l YED NEI UEr N/AEl YN NO UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 153 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-A002-A Equip. Class 3 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
No objects in close proximity of soft targets.YZ NEI U-1 N/AEI-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 153 of 451
No masonry block walls present. Overhead lights have safety chains.All other items are rigidly supported or very robust structural steel.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Exposed conduits are flexible type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI Ur- N/AZ YZ N[-] U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-A002-A         Equip. Class 3 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U-1 N/AEI-No objects in close proximity of soft targets.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present. Overhead lights have safety chains.
All other items are rigidly supported or very robust structuralsteel.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NEI Ur- N/AZ Exposed conduits are flexible type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ N[-] U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-26-2012 7-26-2012 Page 154 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-BO02-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-26-2012 Page 154 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A855, WBN-WB-019 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Westinqhouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: Y[ NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-OXF-212-BO02-B         Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A855, WBN-WB-019 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Westinqhouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YED NEL Ui-1 N/AEl All anchorageis in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YED NEI UIZ N/AEl oxidation?
Mild surface corrosion is present but is in good working condition.
Mild surface corrosion is present but is in good working condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   Y10 NFI UI- N/A[l No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEl U[] N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.
Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y* NEl UFI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YED NEL Ui-1 N/AEl YED NEI UIZ N/AEl Y10 NFI UI- N/A[l YZ NEl U[] N/AElNEl UFI 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 155 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-OXF-212-B002-B Equip. Classo, Transformer1 B s Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 155 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. i-OXF-212-B002-B             Equip. Classo,       B     s Transformer1 Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U[-] N/A[-]
Soft targets are free of any possible interaction.
Soft targets are free of any possible interaction.
YZ NEI U[-] N/A[-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YID N--] Ur-] N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YID N--] Ur-] N/A[]
Overhead lights have safety chains. All other overhead objects are rigidly supported.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI Ur-n N/AI-YO NE-n U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
Overheadlights have safety chains.All other overhead objects are rigidly supported.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NC-- Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI    Ur-n N/AI-Conduit connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YO NE-n U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NC-- Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Upper railing of temporary scaffold No. 113600645 is held together with wire instead of pins. Top railing is not very stable, but not a seismic concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-26-2012 7-26-2012 Page 156 of 451 YN NEI U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Location:
Upper railing of temporary scaffold No. 113600645 is held together with wire instead of pins. Top railingis not very stable, but not a seismic concern.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-26-2012 Page 156 of 451
DeLaval Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St*a*.: YN NEI U[-
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All bolting was present and in good condition.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 713           Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               DeLaval Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Minor visible cracks. None > 0. 5mm.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE-]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI UE!] N/AE!
All bolting was present and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ N[-! UE- N/AE3 oxidation?
No corrosion was observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI UE] N/AE!
Minor visible cracks. None > 0. 5mm.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI UE] N/A[!
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-5, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.
Verified per DWGs 41N353-5, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI UE!] N/AE!YZ N[-! UE- N/AE3 YZ NEI UE] N/AE!YZ NEI UE] N/A[!YO NEI UE3 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 157 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 157 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S           Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YS NEI U-- N/A--
The pump and motor are not soft targets. But all other components have adequate clearance to prevent spatial interaction.
The pump and motor are not soft targets. But all other components have adequate clearance to prevent spatial interaction.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YN NEI UE" N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No block walls or ceiling tiles present. All lights are complete with safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All piping is rigidly mounted and power connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI U-- N/A--YN NEI UE" N/AZ YN NEI ULI N/AZ YS NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
No block walls or ceiling tiles present. All lights are complete with safety cables.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[-] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YN NEI ULI N/AZ All piping is rigidly mounted and power connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YS NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YS N[-] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area is clean and all equipment is painted. Good housekeeping is being maintained.
Area is clean and all equipment is painted. Good housekeeping is being maintained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 158 of 451 Status: Y] N-- Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0009-B Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-23-2012 Page 158 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: Y] N--   Ur--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0009-B                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
All surfaces are painted with minor chipping.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No visible surface corrosion.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracking in concrete near anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ N-- UL- N/AZ No loose, missing, or broken.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces are painted with minor chipping. No visible surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE NEI  UE-- N/AZ No visible cracking in concrete near anchors.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE NZ UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.
Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI U--
YZ N-- UL- N/AZ YZ NEI UE- N/AZ YE NEI UE-- N/AZ YE NZ UE- N/AZ YZ NEI U--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 159 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-PMP-078-0 009-B Equip. Class 3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Temporary scaffolding present, but adequate clearance and appears to be properly restrained.
Page 159 of 451
YZ NEI UDJ N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDI N/AD3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Overhead conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supported and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 0-PMP-078-0 009-B           Equip. Class3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Interaction Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible and attached lines are properly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UDJ N/AD-Temporary scaffolding present, but adequate clearance and appears to be properly restrained.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN ND: UD- N/ADI YIN NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDI N/AD3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDl Ur-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Overhead conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supportedand in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN ND: UD- N/ADI Electrical connections are flexible and attachedlines are properly supported.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YIN NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NDl Ur-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No observed adverse conditions.
No observed adverse conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 160 of 451 S t atus: Y[ NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-1-2012 Page 160 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to-document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t atus: Y[ NEI U[
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.YN NO UI- N/AO 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737             Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to-document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YN NO UI- N/AO All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI U[Z- N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces are painted and well maintained.
All surfaces are painted and well maintained.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NO UZ- N/AZ No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE NZ UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.
Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YS NEI    U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NEI U[Z- N/AZ YZ NO UZ- N/AZ YE NZ UZ N/AZ YS NEI U-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 161 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 161 of 451
Everything has adequate clearance.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S             Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Interaction Effects
All items are rigidly mounted overhead.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI ULI N/AEl Everything has adequate clearance.
No masonry black walls are present. No ceiling tiles are present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Piping is rigidly mounted and qualified.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE N[-] ULI N/AZ3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Conduit connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI ULI N/AEl YE N[-] ULI N/AZ3 YN NEI ULI N/AF'YN NEI UEZ Other Adverse Conditions
All items are rigidly mounted overhead.No masonry black walls are present. No ceiling tiles are present.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that. could YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI ULI N/AF' Piping is rigidly mounted and qualified. Conduit connections are flexible.
Scaffolding in the area is not secured properly per "TI-276" Scaffold#27076 with only (1) horizontal restraint.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UEZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that.could     YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffolding in the area is not secured properly per "TI-276" Scaffold
      #27076 with only (1) horizontal restraint.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in the area is acceptable.
Housekeeping in the area is acceptable. Lots of scaffolding in place.
Lots of scaffolding in place.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-1-2012 8-1-2012 Page 162 of 451 Starus: Y[ NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-OOO1A-S Equip. Class 3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description TD Aux Feedwater Pump IA-S Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-1-2012 Page 162 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Starus: Y[ NEI U[
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YN N[l 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is in place and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-OOO1A-S Equip. Class 3 5. HorizontalPumps Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump IA-S Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692             Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Some minor corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y     = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NO UO N/A[
Anchorage is in place and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE  NO UL] N/AF' oxidation?
Some minor corrosion observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NEI U[-1 N/AO No significant cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NO U[-1 N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-3, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
Verified per DWGs 41N353-3, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NO UO N/A[YE NO UL] N/AF'YN NEI U[-1 N/AO YZ NO U[-1 N/AE-YN NEI UE3 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
Page 163 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-OOOIA-S Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description TD Aux Feedwater Pump IA-S Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 163 of 451
All soft targets have adequate clearance.
 
YS NEI ULi N/AE-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NWi U[] N/AW]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No.     1-PMP-003-OOOIA-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump IA-S Interaction Effects
All items overhead are adequately supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI ULi N/AE-All soft targets have adequate clearance.
No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety wired.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible type. Piping is flexible and rod/hung piping is analyzed ASME pipe.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NWI UW- N/AW1 YM NF-1 UE Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NWi   U[] N/AW]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NWI UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All items overhead are adequately supported.No masonry walls present.No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety wired.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NWI UW- N/AW1 Electricalconnections are flexible type. Piping is flexible and rod/hung piping is analyzed ASME pipe.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YM NF-1 UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NWI UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable in the area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 164 of 451 Srat.t: YN NEI UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-O128-B Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux Feedwater Pump 1B-B Location:
Housekeeping is reasonablein the area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-9-2012 Page 164 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Srat.t: YN NEI   UI--
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Everything was in good condition.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-O128-B                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Aux FeedwaterPump 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 713           Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?There were cracks observed, but they were smaller than 0.5mm.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one         YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YZ NEI UL      N/AZ Everything was in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YO NEI ULI N/A-1 oxidation?
No corrosion was observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YZ NF-Z Ur] N/Al]
There were cracks observed, but they were smaller than 0.5mm.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YZ NEI Ul] N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-6, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.
Verified per DWGs 41N353-6, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YE NEI UF]
YZ NEI UL N/AZ YO NEI ULI N/A-1 YZ NF-Z Ur] N/Al]YZ NEI Ul] N/AEl YE NEI UF]3 Enter the equipment class name from Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found..Page 165 of 451
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
* Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-0 128-B Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux Feedwater Pump 1B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found..
Page 165 of 451
* Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-0 128-B           Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux FeedwaterPump 1B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U-I N/A--
The pumps and motor assembly are not soft targets. However, all other items in the area were acceptable.
The pumps and motor assembly are not soft targets. However, all other items in the area were acceptable.
YZ NEI U-I N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI ULI N/AZ3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI ULI N/AZ3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No block walls or ceiling tile were present. Lights have safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Main piping connections were rigid. Power connections were flexible conduit.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE! UEr N/AZ YS NE-I Ur Other Adverse Conditions
No block walls or ceiling tile were present. Lights have safety cables.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE! UEr    N/AZ Main piping connections were rigid. Power connections were flexible conduit.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NE-I Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UZ-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The area was well maintained and painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained.
The area was well maintainedand painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 166 of 451 Status: YN NEI UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Centrifugal Charging Pump lA-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-23-2012 Page 166 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YN NEI UL--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YO NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All bolts in place. No apparent problems with bolting.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Centrifugal ChargingPump lA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks were observed.YO NE] U-- N/AZ YZ NI] UEI N/AZ YZ NI] UE] N/A[[5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NE] U-- N/AZ All bolts in place. No apparentproblems with bolting.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NI] UEI N/AZ oxidation?
No corrosion was observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NI] UE] N/A[[
No cracks were observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NI-] UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-4, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
Verified per DWGs 41N353-4, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ N[-] UE7 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NI-] UZ- N/AZ YZ N[-] UE7 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 167 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Centrifugal Charging Pump lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 167 of 451
The pump and motor assembly is not a soft target. However, there were no potential threats in the area.YZ NEI UI- N/AEI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI- UI- N/AE[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Everything was well supported and the lights had safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-I N/A[--YN NEI- UE-Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A           Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Centrifugal Charging Pump lA-A Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEl UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UI-    N/AEI The pump and motor assembly is not a soft target. However, there were no potential threats in the area.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI- UI- N/AE[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Everything was well supported and the lights had safety cables.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI U-I N/A[--
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI- UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEl UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area was very well maintained.
Area was very well maintained. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Everything was painted and clean.
Good housekeeping was being maintained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-23-2012 Page 168 of 451
Everything was painted and clean.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-23-2012 7-23-2012 Page 168 of 451 S t a t.s: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-OO15-B Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
St a t .s: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-OO15-B                 Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YZ NL-I 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All anchorage is present and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NL-I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YE NEI UI" N/AZ All anchorageis present and in good condition.
No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NEI U"      N/A-'
oxidation?
No corrosion was observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors?     Y[    NEI UF- N/AZ
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI U-- N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-2, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
Verified per DWGs 41N353-2, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE NEI UI" N/AZ YO NEI U" N/A-'Y[ NEI UF- N/AZ YZ NEI U-- N/A[YN NEI UF-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 169 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-0015-B Equip. Class 3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 169 of 451
The pump and motor assembly are not soft targets. No adverse conditions were observed.YS NE-- UI- N/Ar-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-- N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-0015-B             Equip. Class 3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NE-- UI- N/Ar-The pump and motor assembly are not soft targets. No adverse conditions were observed.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U--     N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All lights were safety cabled and all piping was well supported.
All lights were safety cabled and all piping was well supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Piping and conduit connections have adequate flexibility.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ Ni-- Ut-- N/AZ Piping and conduit connections have adequate flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Ni-- Ut-- N/AZ YS NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NEI U--
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area was very well maintained.
Area was very well maintained. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Everything was painted and clean.
Good housekeeping was being maintained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            7-23-2012 Page 170 of 451
Everything was painted and clean.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-23-2012 7-23-2012 Page 170 of 451 Status: YE NE- UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Location:
 
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: YE NE- UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Johnston Pump Co.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431                   Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741           Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Johnston Pump Co.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YN NE-1 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE-1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Mild surface corrosion, paint is degraded and chipped away 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NZI UZ- N/AZ-oxidation?
Mild surface corrosion, paint is degradedand chipped away
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE NZI UZ-] N/AZ-1 No cracks observed
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YN NEI UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWG PCS434485-01
Verified per DWG PCS434485-01
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI U[-]
YO NZI UZ- N/AZ-YE NZI UZ-] N/AZ-1 YN NEI UZ- N/AZ YO NEI U[-]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 171 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No potential interactions YZ NEIl U'- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 171 of 451
No masonry walls or lights overhead.
 
No ceiling tiles. All overhead structures are anchored in place.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Pipes are rigidly supported and electrical connections are flexible 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NZI UZ- N/AZl YZ NEZ UI-Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431             Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEIl U'- N/AZ No potential interactions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls or lights overhead. No ceiling tiles. All overhead structures are anchoredin place.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NZI UZ- N/AZl Pipes are rigidly supported and electricalconnections are flexible
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEZ UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable-but could be better Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-24-2012 7-24-2012 Page 172 of 451 s t atus: YE NE U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0440 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump 1B-B Location:
Housekeeping is reasonable-butcould be better Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-24-2012 Page 172 of 451
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Johnston Pump Co.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
s t atus: YE NE U-]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZNIEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0440                   Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump 1B-B Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741             Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Johnston Pump Co.
No bent, broken, or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Free of corrosion-all painted, good housekeeping
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZNIEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YN NEI UI- N/AZ No bent, broken, or loose hardware.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YM NI" U-] N/AZ oxidation?
Free of corrosion-allpainted, good housekeeping
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NE] Ul- N/AL!
No cracks observed
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI    U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWG PCS434485-01
Verified per DWG PCS434485-01
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No concerns YN NEI UI- N/AZ YM NI" U-] N/AZ YZ NE] Ul- N/AL!YZ NEI U-] N/AZ YZ NEI UEI 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
No concerns 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
Page 173 of 451 Equipment ID No. I-PMP-067-0440 Equip. Class 3 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump lB-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 173 of 451
No potential interactions
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. I-PMP-067-0440         Equip. Class 3 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump lB-B Interaction Effects
No masonry block walls or lights overhead.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NDI UrD N/AD No potentialinteractions
No ceiling tiles, all overhead structures are anchored in place.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, all piping is rigidly mounted and all electrical has flex connections
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI  U-1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NDI UrD N/AD YE NEI U-1 N/AZl YZ N--1 UD1 N/AZl YED NEI UDI Other Adverse Conditions
No masonry block walls or lights overhead.No ceiling tiles, all overhead structures are anchoredin place.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ N--1 UD1 N/AZl Yes, all piping is rigidly mounted and all electricalhas flex connections
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YED NEI UDI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No other seismic concerns Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No other seismic concerns Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping-area clean and painted.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-24-2012 7-24-2012 Page 174 of 451 S t.tus: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-070-0131-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal Barrier Booster Pump 1A-A Location:
Good housekeeping-areaclean and painted.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-24-2012 Page 174 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St .tus: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YN N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken. Bolted through channel on pedestal.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No.         1-PMP-070-0131-A         Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal BarrierBooster Pump 1A-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[-]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YI  NEI UEI  N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken. Bolted through channel on pedestal.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YI  NEI UE- N/AI oxidation?
Painted with minor chipping, no observed corrosion.
Painted with minor chipping, no observed corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracking or degradation.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YI    NI] UI- N/AI No observed cracking or degradation.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YI    NI] U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 41N353-12, 41N353-16, and N757039 #1 (contract 8324301).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Verified per DWGs 41N353-12, 41N353-16, and N757039 #1 (contract 8324301).
YI NEI UEI N/AEl YI NEI UE- N/AI YI NI] UI- N/AI YI NI] U[] N/AZ YZ NEIUE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEIUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 175 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-070-0131-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal Barrier Booster Pump lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Adequate clearance around pedestal.
Page 175 of 451
Temporary flood barrier and scaffolding present with adequate clearance and appears to be restrained properly.YZ NEI U- N/AZI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI[ U1 N/At3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-070-0131-A             Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal Barrier Booster Pump lA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U-      N/AZI Adequate clearance aroundpedestal. Temporary flood barrierand scaffolding present with adequate clearanceand appears to be restrainedproperly.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI   NEI[ U1 N/At3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supported and in good condition.
Conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connection is flexible and attached lines are supported with adequate flexibility.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NZI UZ3 N/AZ Electrical connection is flexible and attached lines are supported with adequate flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NZI UZ3 N/AZ YED NEI UFI Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YED NEI UFI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI U[Z]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NZI U[Z]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No observed adverse seismic conditions.
No observed adverse seismic conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 176 of 451 St.tus: Y[ N[- UM]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Location:
General housekeeping is good.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-1-2012 Page 176 of 451
Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St.tus: Y[ N[- UM]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
No missing, damaged, or loose.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A                 Equip. Class3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741           Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks > 0. 5mm.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI YED NEI U[-1 N/AZ-Y[D NEI U--1 N/AZ YO Nil U[-- N/AZ YED NO UE- N/AZ Y¥ NrZ Ur]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YED NEI U[-1 N/AZ-No missing, damaged, or loose.
Page 177 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Y[D NEI U--1 N/AZ oxidation?
Over head scaffolding close to level indicator, but scaffolding is adequately restrained.
Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.
Close proximity of electrical conduit and prelube throttle (0-THU-67-506A).
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO Nil U[-- N/AZ No visible cracks > 0. 5mm.
Deemed credible, but not significant.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YED NO UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y¥   NrZ Ur]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 177 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A             Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UE- N/AZ Over head scaffolding close to level indicator,but scaffolding is adequatelyrestrained.Close proximity of electricalconduit and prelube throttle (0-THU-67-506A). Deemed credible, but not significant.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U[] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE- N/AZ YN NEI U[] N/AE3 YER N[] U-- N/AZ YZ NEI U[-Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YER N[] U-- N/AZ All electrical connections are flexible.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[W adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI U[W adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping reasonable, area is dirty and wet as expected.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 178 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Location:
Housekeeping reasonable,area is dirty and wet as expected.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-24-2012 Page 178 of 451
Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: Y[ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing, damaged, or loose.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A                 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741           Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Mild surface corrosion where paint is chipped away.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?(1) Minor crack between anchors. Not a significant seismic concern.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YI NEI    UII N/AZ No missing, damaged, or loose.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NEI    U[] N/A-1 oxidation?
Mild surface corrosion where paint is chipped away.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE N[i    UI- N/AEl (1) Minor crack between anchors. Not a significant seismic concern.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ N[E UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchorsequally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YI NEI UII N/AZ YO NEI U[] N/A-1 YE N[i UI- N/AEl YZ N[E UI- N/AZ Page 179 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 179 of 451
Piping in close proximity to motor enclosure, but vertical displacement is negligible.
 
Y[D NEI UE- N/Al 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UEI N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A             Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[D NEI UE- N/Al Piping in close proximity to motor enclosure, but vertical displacement is negligible.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UEI N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray rigidly and in good working condition.
Cable tray rigidly and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE-- Urn N/A[Z YZ NEl U-EJ Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE-- Urn N/A[Z All electrical connections are flexible.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEl U-EJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Observed oil container in area not restrained adequately to resist tipping. See area walk-by WBN-WB-010.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Observed oil containerin area not restrainedadequately to resist tipping. See area walk-by WBN-WB-010.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping reasonable, area is dirty and wet as expected.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 180 of 451 Starus: YE NEI UEýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Location:
Housekeeping reasonable,area is dirty and wet as expected.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1109, WBN-WB-009 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-24-2012 Page 180 of 451
Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Starus: YE NEI UEý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing, damaged, or loose.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B                 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741             Room, Area 1109, WBN-WB-009 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           Y    NEI-1 ULJ N/A--
No missing, damaged, or loose.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI    UI- N/A--
oxidation?
Anchorage is mostly painted with some paint chipping away with mild surface corrosion.
Anchorage is mostly painted with some paint chipping away with mild surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks > 0. 5mm near anchorage.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI    U-- N/A-1 No visible cracks > 0.5mm near anchorage.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI U-'    N/A--
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YZ NEI Y NEI-1 ULJ N/A--YZ NEI UI- N/A--YZ NEI U-- N/A-1 YZ NEI U-' N/A--YZ NEI UI-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.
Page 181 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No nearby equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Overhead scaffolding present and properly restrained.
Page 181 of 451
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded.
Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B             Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Interaction Effects
No masonry block walls.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All electrical connections are flexible and piping is rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI U-1 N/A[]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-1 N/A[]YN NEl UI- N/A[.YN NEI UI- N/AZ YZ NFI UE-1 Other Adverse Conditions
No nearby equipment. Overhead scaffolding present and properly restrained.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NfE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEl UI- N/A[.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded. No masonry block walls.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UI- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible and piping is rigidly supported.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NFI UE-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NfE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Reasonably good housekeeping/maintained.
Reasonably good housekeeping/maintained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-24-2012 7-24-2012 Page 182 of 451 Status: YZ N[-] uED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            7-24-2012 Page 182 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YZ N[-] uED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B                 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 676           Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YE- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded frame to embed plate, painted and in good working condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Painted and clean.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI Ur] N/AZ Welded frame to embed plate, painted and in good working condition.
YO NEI Ur] N/AZ Y9 NEI Ur- N/AZ--YE NEI UE- N/AZ YZ NI U-- N/A YNZNlUZ--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Y9 NEI Ur- N/AZ--
Page 183 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 18-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
Nearby chain hoist (credible but not significant).
Paintedand clean.
All other equipment and structures have adequate clearance.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE NEI UE- N/AZ
YER N[-] UZ-1 N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NI U-- N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YNZNlUZ--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 183 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B           Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 18-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YER N[-] UZ-1 N/AZ Nearby chain hoist (credible but not significant). All other equipment and structures have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead conduit and piping rigidly supported.
Overhead conduit and piping rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Seismic piping supports in place to minimize load to nozzles.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI Ur- N/AZ YN NEI UZ Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI Ur- N/AZ Seismic piping supports in place to minimize load to nozzles.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YI   NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 184 of 451 S t a t us: YE ND U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-FCV-032-0082-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow IsoL Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012 Page 184 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t a t us: YE ND U[-]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. O-FCV-032-0082-A                 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow IsoL Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Mounted in ASME piping.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No corrosion identified.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces were painted, galvanized, or stainless steel.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Inline mounted in ASME piping.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
YZ NEI UE] N/AE]YO NEI UE]- N/AE]YEI NEI UE] N/AN YE] NEI UE-] N/AZ YO NEi UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Mounted in ASME piping.
Page 185 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-FCV-032-0082-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow Isol.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI UE]- N/AE]
All items have adequate clearance.
oxidation?
No objects overhead to be an issue.YE NEI Ur- N/AE-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI ULI- N/A--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No corrosion identified. All surfaces were painted, galvanized, or stainless steel.
None present-this is on the refueling floor.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NI UE- N/Al]Y19 NEI Ur Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YEI NEI UE] N/AN Inline mounted in ASME piping.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE] NEI UE-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEi        UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 185 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 0-FCV-032-0082-A           Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow Isol.
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NEI Ur- N/AE-All items have adequate clearance. No objects overhead to be an issue.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI ULI- N/A--
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
None present-this is on the refueling floor.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NI UE- N/Al]
All connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y19 NEI Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 186 of 451 S t atus: YN NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CVCS Charqing Header/RCP Seal In. Flow Cntl Location:
Housekeeping is very good in this area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-6-2012 Page 186 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YN NEI   UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YE- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089                   Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS Charqing Header/RCPSeal In. Flow Cntl Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A309 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI UE] N/AE]YO NEI U-] N/AE]YE-1 NEI UE-1 N/AZ YE-1 NEI UE] N/AO YN NE] UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YO NEI    UE] N/AE]
Page 187 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CVCS Charqing Header/RCP Seal Ini. Flow Cntl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI    U-] N/AE]
Tubing to scaffolding clearance is greater than 1". Is not a concern.YS NEI Ur- N/All 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U'- N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
No masonry block walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE N[ UZ1 N/AZ YZ NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE-1 NEI UE-1 N/AZ
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE-1 NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NE] UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 187 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089             Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS CharqingHeader/RCPSeal Ini. Flow Cntl Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI Ur-    N/All Tubing to scaffolding clearanceis greaterthan 1". Is not a concern.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[   NEI U'- N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE N[    UZ1 N/AZ
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 188 of 451 Status: YE N[-] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0093 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CVCS Charging Header Flow/PZR Level Control Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-7-2012 Page 188 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A310, WBN-WB-033 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE N[-] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0093                   Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS Charging HeaderFlow/PZR Level Control Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A310, WBN-WB-033 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Valve, in-line mounted in ASME piping.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Welded in-line in ASME piping, everything appears to be in place.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All items are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YI- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Valve, in-line mounted in ASME piping.
YE NEI U-- N/All YE NEI U-- N/AE3 Y[-- Nil U-- N/A[D YI- NEI UI- N/AZ YO NEI UCI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YE NEI U-- N/All Welded in-line in ASME piping, everything appears to be in place.
Page 189 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-FCV-062-0093 Equip. Class 3 7 Pneumatic-Onerated Valves Equipment Description CVCS Changing Header Flow/PZR Level Control Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE NEI U-- N/AE3 oxidation?
Observed clearance of Y4"- 1" between the AOD operator and civil!structural feature.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All items are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion observed.
A non-reinforced masonry block wall is in the room, but is in good condition and properly restrained.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y[-- Nil U-- N/A[D
Not in the area of the valve. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YI- NEI UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Tubing connections have good flexibility.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UCI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEIl U[- N/A[]YZ NEI U[] N/Al]YED N[] UL- N/Al]YZ NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Page 189 of 451
There is scaffolding present in the room and it appears to be well restrained.
 
Equipment ID No. i-FCV-062-0093             Equip. Class3 7 Pneumatic-OneratedValves Equipment Description CVCS Changing Header Flow/PZR Level Control Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEIl U[-    N/A[]
Observed clearance of Y4"- 1" between the AOD operatorand civil!
structuralfeature.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
A non-reinforcedmasonry block wall is in the room, but is in good condition and properly restrained.Not in the area of the valve. All overheaditems are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YED N[] UL- N/Al]
Tubing connections have good flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI   ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is scaffolding present in the room and it appearsto be well restrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in this area is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-7-2012 8-7-2012 Page 190 of 451 Status: Y[ NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Location:
Housekeeping in this area is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-7-2012 Page 190 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YFt NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: Y[ NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
* Valve is in-line mounted in ASME piping.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All components are in place and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B                 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692             Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
In-line mounted in ASME piping.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YFt NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YN NEl U[- N/A[YN NEl UL-I N/A[: YI- NOl U[1 N/AN YEI NEl U-I N/AO YN NEI UF-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
* Valve is in-line mounted in ASME piping.
Page 191 of 451 Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Safety Iniection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEl U[- N/A[
All soft targets are free of spatial interactions.
All components are in place and in good condition.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEl UL-I N/A[:
Conduits, pipe, and duct are all rigidly mounted. No masonry walls in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit connections are flexible.
oxidation?
Piping is rigidly supported ASME.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[E NEI UE- N/A[]YN NEI US N/AZ YZ NEI U[S N/AZI YZ NEI Ur3 Other Adverse Conditions
In-line mounted in ASME piping.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI US-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YI- NOl U[1 N/AN
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEl U-I N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 191 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B             Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Safety Iniection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[E NEI UE- N/A[]
All soft targets are free of spatialinteractions.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI    US N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Conduits,pipe, and duct are all rigidly mounted. No masonry walls in the area.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI    U[S N/AZI All conduit connections are flexible. Piping is rigidly supported ASME.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI Ur3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI US-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Scaffolding was present in the area, but was adequately restrained.
Scaffolding was present in the area, but was adequately restrained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-6-2012 8-6-2012 Page 192 of 451 Status: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0213-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler 1A ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-6-2012 Page 192 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space.below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-FCV-067-0213-A         Equip. Class3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler 1A ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YE' NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?In-line piping component.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space.below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YE- NEI U-. N/A[
In-line component in ASME piping.YE- NEI U-. N/A[YEI NE UE- N/A0 YE- N[E1 UE-1 N/AE YE[ NE-1 UE1 N/A[YO NEI UE--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
In-line piping component.
Page 193 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0213-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler IA ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YEI NE UE- N/A0 oxidation?
More than 2" clearance to all items.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE- N[E1 UE-1 N/AE
No masonry walls present. All overhead items are rigidly mounted.Scaffolding is in close proximity but well restrained.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE[  NE-1 UE1 N/A[
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All tubing connections have adequate spans and changes in direction to provide adequate flexibility.
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All electrical connections are flexible conduit.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NOI Ul- N/A[]YZ NEI U[] N/AZ YE NEl U[-] N/AZI YZ N--1 U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE--
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
In-line component in ASME piping.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 193 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0213-A               Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler IA ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YN NOI    Ul- N/A[]
More than 2" clearance to all items.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YZ NEI    U[] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present.All overheaditems are rigidly mounted.
Scaffolding is in close proximity but well restrained.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YE NEl U[-] N/AZI All tubing connections have adequate spans and changes in direction to provide adequate flexibility. All electricalconnections are flexible conduit.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YZ N--1 U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE NEI UI' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Congested area-but has required clearances.
Congested area-buthas required clearances.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 194 of 451 Status: N[-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler 1B ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-1-2012 Page 194 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE* N[-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorawe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B                 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler 1B ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Line mounted.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorawe
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YO- NEI UE- N/AO Line mounted.
YEI NO YO- NEI UE- N/AO YE- NEI U[:] N/AE YE- NE1 UE- N/An YEI NEI UE- N/AN YN N[-1 U[--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE- NEI U[:] N/AE oxidation?
Page 195 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler lB ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE- NE1 UE- N/An
Temporary scaffolding in the area with adequate clearance and appears to be properly restrained.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI UE- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YZ NEI UI- N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI U0I- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN N[-1 U[--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 195 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B             Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler lB ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI    UI- N/A[l Temporary scaffolding in the area with adequate clearance and appearsto be properly restrained.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI U0I- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead piping and conduit is rigidly supported.
Overhead piping and conduit is rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Tubing connections have adequate spans and bends to provide flexibility.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UE- N/AEl Tubing connections have adequate spans and bends to provide flexibility. Electricalconnections are flexible.
Electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/AEl YN NEI U[-Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI U[-
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Congested area with scaffolding.
Congested area with scaffolding.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 196 of 451 S t arus: YE NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description SI Pump 1B-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-1-2012 Page 196 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St arus: YE NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B                 Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description SI Pump 1B-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692             Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?This MOV is inline mounted. All flange bolts were in place.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YN NEI UI N/AZ YZ NI] U- N/AO YO NEI UE1 N/AZ YOI NIl UI-1 N/AZ YED NO U-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEI UI N/AZ This MOV is inline mounted. All flange bolts were in place.
Page 197 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description SI Pump lB-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NI] U-    N/AO oxidation?
There was adequate clearance between the valve and operator to prevent spatial interactions.
No corrosion was observed.
YN NE-- UI1 N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur- N/Ar--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YO NEI UE1 N/AZ
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit was a flexible connection.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YOI NIl UI-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UEl N/AZl YZ NEI Ull Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YED NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NZI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
The pipe that the valve is installed in is rigidly mounted.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Page 197 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B       Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description SI Pump lB-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NE-- UI1 N/A[l There was adequate clearance between the valve and operator to prevent spatialinteractions.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur- N/Ar--
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UEl N/AZl Conduit was a flexible connection.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI Ull of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NZI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The pipe that the valve is installedin is rigidly mounted.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
All surfaces were clean and painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained.
All surfaces were clean and painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-23-2012 7-23-2012 Page 198 of 451 S t.a.u: YZ NEI UIZ]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Suction Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-23-2012 Page 198 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t .a.u: YZ NEI UIZ]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YE] NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Line mounted to piping, no additional anchorage provided for MOV. All hardware is present and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B                 Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Suction Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 676             Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
See Question 2.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Adequately mounted/supported by piping.YE NEI Ur] N/As YN NFI U-] N/Al]YrI- NEI Ur] N/A2 YrI NEI Ur- N/AC9 YZ NEI Ur]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE NEI Ur] N/As Line mounted to piping, no additionalanchorageprovided for MOV. All hardware is present and in good condition.
Page 199 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Suction Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NFI U-] N/Al]
.No nearby equipment, adequate clearance around MOV.YO NEI UE- N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
All overhead piping/conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.
See Question 2.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines are made with flexible connections.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YrI- NEI Ur] N/A2
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Nil U-1 N/AZl YIE NE UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YrI NEI Ur- N/AC9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZl UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI Ur]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Adequately mounted/supportedby piping.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 199 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B             Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Suction Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NEI UE- N/AEl
      .No nearby equipment, adequate clearance around MOV.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overheadpiping/conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ Nil U-1 N/AZl Attached lines are made with flexible connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YIE NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NZl UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-18-2012 7-18-2012 Page 200 of 451 Status: Y] N[:] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B Refrigerant Line FSV Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-18-2012 Page 200 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area A924, WBN-WB-032 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used .to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: Y] N[:] U--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Inline to ASME piping.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Inline to ASME piping.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B                 Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B RefrigerantLine FSV Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 786           Room, Area A924, WBN-WB-032 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used .to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline to ASME piping.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YED Nil UE1 N/A[]
Inline to ASME piping.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UE] N/A[]
oxidation?
Mild surface corrosion.
Mild surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Inline to ASME piping.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE-I N[-1 UZ- N/AZ Inline to ASME piping.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI U-- N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YZ NE YED Nil UE1 N/A[]YZ NEI UE] N/A[]YE-I N[-1 UZ- N/AZ YEI NEI U-- N/AS YZ NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 201 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B Refriqerant Line FSV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No soft impact issues.YE NEI UrI N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U0 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 201 of 451
All overhead duct and electrical are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit is flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE1 N/AZI YE NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B           Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B RefriqerantLine FSV Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE   NEI UrI N/AZ No soft impact issues.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U0 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overhead duct and electricalare rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UE1 N/AZI Conduit is flexible conduit type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very bad in this area. Very wet environment.
Housekeeping is very bad in this area. Very wet environment. Anchor bolts on associatedpipe support are corroded.Not a significant concern.
Anchor bolts on associated pipe support are corroded.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-6-2012 Page 202 of 451
Not a significant concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 202 of 451 Srarusý: YN NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0135-A Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A 307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Srarusý: YN NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Equipment ID No.         1-LCV-062-0135-A         Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A 307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Line mounted in ASME piping.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion was observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEI UE' N/AEl Line mounted in ASME piping.
Inline mounted in ASME piping.YN NEI UE' N/AEl YN N['I UE1 N/A[[]YE- NEI UE- N/As YE[ N[E] UE] N/AN YE NEI U-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN N['I UE1 N/A[[]
Page 203 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0135-A Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
All soft targets are clear of spatial interactions.
All surfaces are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion was observed.
YZ NEI Url N/AZl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEl U-- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE- NEI UE- N/As
No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE[  N[E] UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All other items are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YE NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Rigidly mounted in piping.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NZl U-- N/AZ YN NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
Inline mounted in ASME piping.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 203 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0135-A               Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YZ NEI Url N/AZl All soft targets are clear of spatial interactions.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y[   NEl U-- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead. All other items are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YS NZl U-- N/AZ All connections are flexible. Rigidly mounted in piping.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YN NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in the area is reasonable.
Housekeeping in the area is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-6-2012 8-6-2012 Page 204 of 451 Status: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-6-2012 Page 204 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Status: YN ND     UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B                 Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST           CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Inline mounted in ASME piping.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Line mounted in piping. All hardware is in good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Line mounted in ASME piping.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Inline mounted in ASME piping.
YN NE] UE] N/AE]YZ NEI UE] N/AE]YEI NEI UE-] N/AO Y E] NEI UE] N/AN YN NE] UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NE] UE] N/AE]
Page 205 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Line mounted in piping. All hardwareis in good condition.
All soft targets have sufficient clearance.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI    UE] N/AE]
YE NE] U[I- N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead.
Line mounted in ASME piping.
All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YEI NEI  UE-] N/AO
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE] NEI UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
The valve is rigidly mounted in ASME piping.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV NEI U-] N/AE]YZ NEI U[Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NE] UE]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 205 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B             Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NE] U[I- N/AEl All soft targets have sufficient clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead.All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YV NEI U-] N/AE]
All connections are flexible. The valve is rigidly mounted in ASME piping.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in the area is reasonable.
Housekeeping in the area is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 206 of 451 Sta t us: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan 1A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-6-2012 Page 206 of 451
Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)  
 
.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Sta t us: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A                 Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan 1A-A Location: Bldg. RB                 Floor El. 716             Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                   .
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Observed from floor of Accumulator
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Supported by rigid structural steel frame that is bolted to the wall.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEI UE- N/AF--
Observed from floor of Accumulator 3. Supported by rigid structural steel frame that is bolted to the wall.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEi      UL] N/A-1 oxidation?
All surfaces are painted an in good condition.
All surfaces are painted an in good condition.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YED NEI UE- N/AE-
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI UE] N/A[
YEI NE YN NEI UE- N/AF--YN NEi UL] N/A-1 YED NEI UE- N/AE-YEI NEI UE] N/A[YN NEi UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 207 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A Equip. Class-Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEi      UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NEI ULI N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[:] N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ YN NE UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
Page 207 of 451
: 11. Have you looked for and found' no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A       Equip. Class-Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan lA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI ULI N/AZ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI   U[:] N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found' no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEl Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 9-17-2012 9-17-2012 Page 208 of 451 Status: YE N[-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0447-A Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              9-17-2012 Page 208 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE N[-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0447-A                 Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 760             Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No visible surface corrosion.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Fan bolts are painted and in good condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UII N/A[]
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Some observed hairline cracking.
No loose, missing, or broken hardware.
No observed structural cracks near anchorage  
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YNI NO U-- N/AEF oxidation?
> 0.5mm.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No visible surface corrosion.Fan bolts are painted and in good condition.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UI- N/AF-Some observed hairline cracking. No observed structuralcracks near anchorage > 0.5mm.
YZ NEI YZ NEI UII N/A[]YNI NO U-- N/AEF YO NEI UI- N/AF-YS Nfl U- N/AE-YE NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YS Nfl U-    N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 209 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-044 7-A Equip. Class'Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.
Adequate clearance around fan 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YE NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Overhead conduit, pipe, and air duct rigidly supported and in good condition.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines are flexible conduit/wire.
Page 209 of 451
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] U[] N/AL]YZ NEI U[] N/A[]Y[9 N[E] U[] N/AE3 YZ N-] UE]Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] UM-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-044 7-A           Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NE] U[] N/AL]
Adequate clearance aroundfan
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI  U[] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead conduit,pipe, and airduct rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y[9 N[E] U[] N/AE3 Attached lines are flexible conduit/wire.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ N-] UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NE] UM-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping.
Good housekeeping. No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 210 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 210 of 451 Sr....: YN NEI Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0449-B Equip. Class'Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Location:
 
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Sr....: YN NEI Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Peerless Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Equipment ID No.         1-FAN-030-0449-B         Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 760             Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Peerless Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware present and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NDl UD1 N/AD All hardwarepresent and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ ND1 UD- N/AD oxidation?
Hardware is all painted and free of corrosion.
Hardware is all painted and free of corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Hair-line cracking near anchorage in grout -No cracks apparent in foundation.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NiD UD1 N/AD1 Hair-line cracking near anchoragein grout - No cracks apparentin foundation.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.
In good working condition YZ NEI YZ NDl UD1 N/AD YZ ND1 UD- N/AD YZ NiD UD1 N/AD1 YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 YZ NEI U--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI U--
Page 211 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0449-B Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All adjacent equipment is adequately anchored and supported.
In good working condition 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
YZ NEI U-I N/ACl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U- N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 211 of 451
Lights are safety cable restrained.
 
No other fall concerns.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Duct has expansion joint for isolation and there are flexible conduit connections.
Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0449-B       Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Interaction Effects
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI UEr N/AZI YZ NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U-I N/ACl All adjacent equipment is adequately anchored and supported.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-     N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safety cable restrained.No other fall concerns.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NEI UEr    N/AZI Duct has expansion joint for isolation and there are flexible conduit connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Equipment is clear for the intended service. All components are present and in good working condition.
Equipment is clear for the intended service. All components are present and in good working condition.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-17-2012 7-17-2012 Page 212 of 451 Sta t us: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0459-A Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen lA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-17-2012 Page 212 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Sta t us: YZ NEI U--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0459-A                 Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen lA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 760           Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken hardware.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YED NEl UW- N/AZl oxidation?
No visible surface corrosion.
No visible surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed structural cracks near anchorage  
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YED NEl U-    N/AZl No observed structuralcracks near anchorage >0 .5mm
>0 .5mm 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI U-- N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3 and 18N305.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-3 and 18N305.
YN NEI YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl YED NEl UW- N/AZl YED NEl U- N/AZl YZ NEI U-- N/AE3 YZ N--1 UE1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ N--1 UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 213 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-0459-A Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen IA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Adequate clearance around fan Y[D NE] UEI N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UI- N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 213 of 451
Overhead conduit, pipe, and air duct rigidly supported and in good condition.
 
Masonry wall present and in good condition..
Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-0459-A           Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen IA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Interaction Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connection made with flexible conduit/wire.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[D NE] UEI N/A[
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NE] UE1 N/AE]YN NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions
Adequate clearance aroundfan
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UI- N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead conduit, pipe, and air duct rigidly supported and in good condition. Masonry wall present and in good condition..
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NE] UE1 N/AE]
Electrical connection made with flexible conduit/wire.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YN NE] Ur]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping. No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-31-2012 Page 214 of 451
 
Status: YZ ND] U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A                  Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Location: Bldg. CNTL                Floor El. 755            Room, Area C401, WBN-WB-046 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[  NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YC9 NE UF- N/AEl All hardware is in place and in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YZ NEI U-- N/AZl oxidation?
Moderate surface corrosion was observed on the anchorbolts.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?  YE Nil Uil N/AZl No significant cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YZ Nil U-- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWG 48N1305.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NEI    UEZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 215 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A            Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YN NEI   ULI N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NEI  U[:] N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead. All items overheadare rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YED NI] Ul-] N/Al]
All piping and tubing have adequate changes in direction.All electrical connections are cable or flex type conduit. Some pipe also has flex hose connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YZ N[:] U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Observed electrical connection that appearsto be cable, not conduit.
After further review was determined to be flex conduit as required.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping.
Housekeeping is reasonablein this area.
No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-10-2012 Page 216 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-31-2012 7-31-2012 Page 214 of 451 Status: YZ ND] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Location:
 
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C401, WBN-WB-046 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
St .a.u: YZ NEI U--
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0045                   Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A809, WBN-WB-041 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware is in place and in good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Moderate surface corrosion was observed on the anchor bolts.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-I N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified per DWG 48N1305.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI UI- N/A[
YC9 NE UF- N/AEl YZ NEI U-- N/AZl YE Nil Uil N/AZl YZ Nil U-- N/AZl YO NEI UEZ 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
All anchoragepresent and painted. Good condition.
Page 215 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NI- U-- N/AZ-oxidation?
All items have adequate clearance.
All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI U-l N/Ar-
No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead.
        .No significantcracks observed.
All items overhead are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All piping and tubing have adequate changes in direction.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ- NEI Ur-Z N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All electrical connections are cable or flex type conduit. Some pipe also has flex hose connections.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NE-I Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI ULI N/AZ Y0 NEI U[:] N/AEZ YED NI] Ul-] N/Al]YZ N[:] U[]Other Adverse Conditions
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Page 217 of 451
Observed electrical connection that appears to be cable, not conduit.After further review was determined to be flex conduit as required.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
 
Housekeeping is reasonable in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 216 of 451 S t.a.u: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0045 Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Location:
Equipment ID No.     o-AHU-031-0045         Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Interaction Effects
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A809, WBN-WB-041 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NCI ULI N/A-I Electrical connection is clearof all possible impact items. Expansion joint at duct connection has good clearance.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y19 NE] Ur- N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YE-I N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage present and painted. Good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
All surfaces are painted. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?.No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI UI- N/A[YZ NI- U-- N/AZ-YO NEI U-l N/Ar-YZ- NEI Ur-Z N/AO YO NE-I Ur 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 217 of 451 Equipment ID No. o-AHU-031-0045 Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Electrical connection is clear of all possible impact items. Expansion joint at duct connection has good clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible conduit type. Piping is rigidly supported with changes in direction.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UEr    N/AZ Electrical connections are flexible conduit type. Piping is rigidly supported with changes in direction.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NCI ULI N/A-I Y19 NE] Ur- N/Ar-YZ NEI UEr N/AZ Y E NE Ur-I Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y E NE Ur-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good in the area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 218 of 451 Status: YZ N[-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-AHU-031-0461-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU IA-A Location:
Housekeeping is good in the area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-9-2012 Page 218 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YZ N[-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All items are in place-no bent broken missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No.         1-AHU-031-0461-A         Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU IA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
The anchor bolts have significant corrosion.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
After further review and comparison with other examples of corrosion, this was deemed to be only moderate corrosion.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YED NE] UE] N/AE]
YED NE] UE] N/AE]YO NE-] UE] N/AE]YN NE] U-] N/AE]YEI NE] UE] N/AI YN NEl UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
All items are in place-no bent broken missing or loose hardware.
Page 219 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-AHU-031-046 1-A Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room IA Supply AHU lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NE-] UE] N/AE]
Cable tray supports in the area are close-the frame has been notched to allow for a 1/4" clearance.
oxidation?
All other items are good.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
The anchor bolts have significant corrosion.After further review and comparison with other examples of corrosion, this was deemed to be only moderate corrosion.
No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NE] U-] N/AE]
All items overhead are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All piping has flexible connections.
No significant cracks observed.
Electrical connections are flex type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NOI UL- N/A[YED NEI- U-I N/Ar YN NO U- N/AZ YO NEI Ur-Other Adverse Conditions
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YEI NE] UE] N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEl UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 219 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-AHU-031-046 1-A           Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room IA Supply AHU lA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y0 NOI  UL- N/A[
Cable tray supports in the area are close-the frame has been notched to allow for a 1/4" clearance. All other items are good.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI- U-I N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead.All items overheadare rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NO U-      N/AZ All piping has flexible connections. Electrical connections are flex type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YO NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-10-2012 8-10-2012 Page 220 of 451 sta t us: YEl NO ULýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A Location:
Housekeeping is reasonablein this area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-10-2012 Page 220 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
sta tus: YEl NO ULý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Covered with insulation, but intact and no visible maintenance.
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A               Equip. Class3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Insulation was removed to verify anchorage.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All anchorage was present.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Significant corrosion was observed following removal of insulation around base.YZ NEI UEr N/AZ Yr- NO Ur] N/AE1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI Ur] N/AL!No visible cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UEr    N/AZ Covered with insulation, but intact and no visible maintenance.
YZ NE! UE] N/AE!Y[-] NO UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Insulation was removed to verify anchorage.All anchorage was present.
Page 221 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Yr- NO Ur] N/AE1 oxidation?
Covered by structural steel frame and sheet metal. Pipe penetrating sheet metal. Potential for impact, but not significant.
Significant corrosion was observed following removal of insulation around base.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI Ur] N/AL!
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported.
No visible cracks.
No block walls in vicinity 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible and attached piping is rigidly supported with flexible connections.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NE! UE] N/AE!
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UL- N/AE YER NEI U-- N/AZ YZ NJ-] U-- N/A[l YI N-U1u Other Adverse Conditions
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y[-] NO UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 221 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI UL- N/AE Covered by structuralsteel frame and sheet metal. Pipe penetrating sheet metal. Potentialfor impact, but not significant.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported. No block walls in vicinity
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NJ-] U-- N/A[l Electrical connections are flexible and attachedpiping is rigidly supported with flexible connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YI  N-U1u of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good. Moderately wet environment.
General housekeeping is good. Moderately wet environment.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 222 of 451 S t a t us: YEI NO UM!Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-25-2012 Page 222 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
YORK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
St at us: YEI NO UM!
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YS NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Anchor points are covered with insulation.
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737             Room, Area A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               YORK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Will return with AUO to remove insulation.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U       = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware is present and not loose, bent, or broken. (Observed after removal of insulation)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YS NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Anchor points are covered with insulation. Will return with AUO to remove insulation.
The south and north pedestals have significant corrosion.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI UE- N/AZ1 All hardware is present and not loose, bent, or broken. (Observed after removal of insulation)
The south base plate has bubbled. Bolts on south side of pedestal have significant corrosion as well.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Observed spider web type cracking mainly in the paint. No significant cracks (greater than 0. 5 mm).5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE-1 NO UE-1 N/AZl oxidation?
Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The south and north pedestals have significant corrosion. The south base plate has bubbled. Bolts on south side of pedestal have significant corrosion as well.
YO NEI UE- N/AZ1 YE-1 NO UE-1 N/AZl YN NEI UE- N/AZ YZ NEI UEF N/AZl YE] NO UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NEI UE- N/AZ Observed spider web type cracking mainly in the paint. No significant cracks (greaterthan 0. 5 mm).
Page 223 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI UEF N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Adequate clearance is provided to all soft targets. All overhead items are rigidly mounted.Y[ NEI UD- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UZI N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YE] NO UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 223 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[  NEI UD- N/AZ Adequate clearance is provided to all soft targets.All overhead items are rigidly mounted.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UZI     N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All systems overhead are rigidly supported.
No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All systems overhead are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Tubing is guided when leaving skid, but has change in direction to allow for flexibility.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UZI N/A[Z Tubing is guided when leaving skid, but has change in direction to allow for flexibility. All electricalconnections are flexible type.
All electrical connections are flexible type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UZI N/A[Z YM NEZ U[Z Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YM NEZ U[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is not bad-but there is significant condensation under the insulation leading to the corrosion.
Housekeeping is not bad-but there is significant condensation under the insulation leading to the corrosion.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 224 of 451 St.aus: YZ NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0080-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room Chiller A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-7-2012 Page 224 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
St.aus: YZ NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0080-A                 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No loose, missing, or broken.YZ NEI UE] N/AE 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Mild surface corrosion and chipped paint.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks.YED NEI UE- N/AE YZ NEl UE- N/AE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YZ NEI UE] N/AE No loose, missing, or broken.
YE NEI UE] N/AS YO NEI UE1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YED NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
Page 225 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0080-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Mild surface corrosion and chipped paint.
Covered with structural steel frame and sheet metal.YN NE--] UI N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEIr UEJ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEl UE- N/AE No visible cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE NEI UE] N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 225 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0080-A           Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NE--] UI N/AZ Covered with structuralsteel frame and sheet metal.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEIr UEJ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported.
HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical and piping have flexible connections.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NZ-1 U[-- N/AZ-Electrical and piping have flexible connections.
YZ NZ-1 U[-- N/AZ-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI NEI UF-1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YI  NEI UF-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI   Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Temporary scaffolding in area, but appears to be adequately restrained/supported.
Temporary scaffolding in area, but appears to be adequately restrained/supported.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Protected equipment stanchions left in area. Should be removed.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 226 of 451 Status: YE NEI U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0128 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller A-A Location:
Protectedequipment stanchions left in area. Should be removed.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-25-2012 Page 226 of 451
PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space-is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YE NEI U[--
YO- N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing, loose, or damaged. Insulation was removed for inspection.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0128                   Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. CNTL               Floor El. 692             Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space-is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YZ NEI UE! N/AO Y[ NE! UI- N/A[-]No observed corrosion.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Insulation was removed for inspection.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[[ N/AZ No significant cracking observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UE! N/AO No missing, loose, or damaged. Insulation was removed for inspection.
YE! NE! U-- N/AZ 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Y[ NE! UI- N/A[-]
oxidation?
No observed corrosion.Insulation was removed for inspection.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI U[[ N/AZ No significant cracking observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE! NE! U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 227 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0128 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 227 of 451
Evetything is rigidly supported and/or has sufficient clearance.
 
Note small bore connection at the end of the chiller does not have a guide.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0128             Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerA-A Interaction Effects
Equipment is protected by a permanent hood. All items in the area are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?One large 4" conduit passes through the permanent hood. After review of WB-DC-20-32, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI UE1 N/An Evetything is rigidly supported and/orhas sufficient clearance. Note small bore connection at the end of the chiller does not have a guide.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE1 N/An YER NEI UE N/AZ YZ NE-1 UE- N/A--YZ NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI UE N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment is protected by a permanenthood. All items in the area are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE-1 UE- N/A--
One large 4" conduit passes through the permanent hood. After review of WB-DC-20-32, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE N[-] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good in the area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 228 of 451 Status: YE NE- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0129 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B Location:
Housekeeping is good in the area.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-7-2012 Page 228 of 451
PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YE NE- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0129                   Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerB-B Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Insulation was not on this Unit. All items present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Surfaces are greasy and dirty-no corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracking observed.YEI NO YED NEI U[-J N/AZ YO Nil U-- N/AE'YO NEI UZ-1 N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YED NEI U[-J N/AZ Insulation was not on this Unit. All items present and in good condition.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO Nil U-- N/AE' oxidation?
YZ- N["Z UZ- N/AZ YED NEI U--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Surfaces are greasy and dirty-no corrosion observed.
Page 229 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0129 Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UZ-1 N/AZ No cracking observed.
Small bore connection at the end of the chiller does not appear to have adequate protection/guide.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ- N["Z UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Needs further review.YS NEI UI1 N/A[:]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UL-I N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YED NEI U--
Equipment is protected by a permanent hood.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Potential adverse condition-(2) 2" pipes penetrate the permanent hood. One of them continues on to 1" screwed connections.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
A 4" conduit penetrating the permanent hood-has a guide and continues on with flexible type conduit. Not an adverse seismic condition (after review of WB-DC-20-32).
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-1 N/AZl YS N--1 U--Other Adverse Conditions
Page 229 of 451
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0129             Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI UI1 N/A[:]
Small bore connection at the end of the chillerdoes not appear to have adequate protection/guide.Needs further review.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UL-I N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment is protected by a permanenthood.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI U-1 N/AZl Potentialadverse condition-(2) 2" pipes penetrate the permanent hood. One of them continues on to 1" screwed connections. A 4" conduit penetratingthe permanent hood-has a guide and continues on with flexible type conduit. Not an adverse seismic condition (after review of WB-DC-20-32).
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS N--1 U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 230 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air Compressor B Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-7-2012 Page 230 of 451
Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Ingersoll-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: Y[ NEI U[]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No observed bent, broken or missing hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026                   Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air CompressorB Location: Bldg. TURB                 Floor El. 708           Room, Area T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Ingersoll-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All hardware painted with minor chipping.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Verified per DWG L-9257.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI UZ- N/A[-]YN NEI UEZ N/AZ YZ NEI U-] N/AZ-YN NEI U] N/AZ YZ NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UZ- N/A[-]
Page 231 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026 Equip. Class 3 12. Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air Compressor B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No observed bent, broken or missing hardware.
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEI UEZ N/AZ oxidation?
Portable exhaust fan located near compressor, wheels are locked to avoid rolling.YN N[:] UE- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All hardware painted with minor chipping.
All cable tray is rigidly supported.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI U-] N/AZ-No observed cracking.
Piping is rod hung and in good condition.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YN NEI U] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No masonry block walls in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical line has flexible connection.
Verified per DWG L-9257.
Attached piping is rod hung and properly supported.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE1 N/AZl YS NEI U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 231 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026             Equip. Class 3 12. Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air Compressor B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN N[:] UE- N/AZ Adequate clearance maintained aroundequipment. Portable exhaust fan located nearcompressor, wheels are locked to avoid rolling.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All cable tray is rigidly supported.Piping is rod hung and in good condition. No masonry block walls in the area.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UE1 N/AZl Electrical line has flexible connection. Attached piping is rod hung and properly supported.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UE--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No staged or housekeeping items in the area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 232 of 451 S t a t us: Y[ NiJ UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor A-A Location:
No staged or housekeeping items in the area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-13-2012 Page 232 of 451
Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St a t us: Y[ NiJ UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060                   Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air CompressorA-A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YN NO UEI N/AZ No loose, missing, or broken.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YED NEr-    UE- N/AZ oxidation?
All hardware is painted. No observed corrosion.
All hardware is painted. No observed corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Yt    NEI UEI- N/AZl No visible cracks in concrete. Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appearto be structuralcracking.
Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appear to be structural cracking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NEI UEl N/AZ-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Bolts appeared to be incorrect size per DWG 13220-D-1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).
Bolts appearedto be incorrect size per DWG 13220-D-1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YE NEI U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NO UEI N/AZ YED NEr- UE- N/AZ Yt NEI UEI- N/AZl YE NEI UEl N/AZ-1 YE NEI U[-I 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 233 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 233 of 451
YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ Adequate clearance around compressor.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI] U-- N/A[-]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060             Equip. Class3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux ControlAir CompressorA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ Adequate clearance around compressor.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI   NEI] U-- N/A[-]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.
Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Piping has adequate support with flex connections.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NZ UZJ N/AZ Piping has adequate support with flex connections. Electrical connections are flexible.
Electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NZ UZJ N/AZ YC9 NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YC9 NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping practice.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 234 of 451 S t atus: YE NE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0086 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor B-B Location:
Good housekeeping practice.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-2-2012 Page 234 of 451
Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
S t atus: YE NE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0086                   Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux ControlAir CompressorB-B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Painted and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appear to be structural cracking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YN NEi UE- N/AZl No loose, missing, or broken.
Bolts appeared to be incorrect size per DWG 13220-D- 1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UE- N/AZl oxidation?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Paintedand in good condition.
YN NEi UE- N/AZl YZ NEI UE- N/AZl YE NO UZ- N/A--YO NEI U[-1 N/A[Z YE NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NO UZ- N/A--
Page 235 of 451 Equipment ID No. o-COMP-032-0086 EuC 1 Air Compressors Equip. ClasS3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No visible cracks in concrete. Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appearto be structuralcracking.
Adequate clearance around compressor.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NEI U[-1 N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Temporary scaffolding in area and appears to be adequately restrained.
Bolts appeared to be incorrectsize per DWG 13220-D-1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YE NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 235 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. o-COMP-032-0086         EuC Air Equip. ClasS3   1 Air Compressors Compressors 12, Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI UL-I N/AZ Adequate clearancearound compressor. Temporary scaffolding in area and appearsto be adequately restrained.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U0 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.
Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Piping has adequate support with flex connections.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI U-- N/AZ Piping has adequate support with flex connections. Electrical connections are flexible.
Electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI UL-I N/AZ YN NEI U0 N/AZ YN NEI U-- N/AZ YZ NEI Ur-Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No observed adverse conditions.
No observed adverse conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping items observed, see area walk-by WBN-WB-026.
Good housekeeping items observed, see area walk-by WBN-WB-026.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 236 of 451 Status: YE ND U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-2-2012 Page 236 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Quincy Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE ND U[-
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180                   Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Quincy Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No rust/corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A             = Not Applicable Anchoraae
Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
All items in good working condition painted and free of defects.YED NEI YE NEI U-] N/AZI YE NEI UE- N/AZ YE Nil UZ-1 N/AZ YO NEI U-- N/AZ YO NEI UZ]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE NEI    U-] N/AZI
Page 237 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?
Observed plastic posts and chain for protection of nearby batteries.
No rust/corrosionobserved.
Determined to not be a significant risk.YN NEI ULI N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A[3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE Nil UZ-1 N/AZ No cracks observed.
Overhead lights have safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex hose included for air discharge pipe.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Equipment is properly supported and anchored with no proximity interaction risks of significance.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NEI U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YN NEI UDI N/AEl YI N[l U-1* Other Adverse Conditions
Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UZ]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All items in good working condition painted and free of defects.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 237 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180             Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI ULI N/AEl Observed plastic posts and chain for protection of nearby batteries.
Determined to not be a significant risk.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A[3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead lights have safety cables.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UDI N/AEl Flex hose included for air dischargepipe.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YI  N[l U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Equipment is properly supported and anchored with no proximity interaction risks of significance.
* Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 238 of 451 Status: YE N[- U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0210 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor I Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-17-2012 Page 238 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE N[- U[
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware is in place and in good condition.
Equipment ID No.         1-COMP-082-0210           Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor I Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI UEZ N/A[
YN NO YZ NEI UEZ N/A[YN NEI U-] N/AZ YZ NEI UI] N/AZ-YZ NEI U-] N/A[-Z YZ NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
All hardwareis in place and in good condition.
Page 239 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0210 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEI U-] N/AZ oxidation?
All piping is rigidly mounted. Nothing in close proximity.
All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.
Plastic barricade in the area, but not a significant issue.YZ N[-] ULI N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Url N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI UI] N/AZ-No observed cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI U-] N/A[-Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 239 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0210             Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ N[-] ULI N/AEl All piping is rigidly mounted. Nothing in close proximity. Plastic barricadein the area, but not a significant issue.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI   Url N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. No overhead lights or tiles. All items above are rigidly supported.
No masonry walls present. No overhead lights or tiles. All items above are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Pipe has a flex hose and conduit is flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI NEI UE- N/AZI YO NEI U--1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YI NEI UE- N/AZI Pipe has a flex hose and conduit is flexible.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YO NEI U--1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No housekeeping issues, very clean area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-201.2 Page 240 of 451 S t atus: YN NEJ UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-A Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Location:
No housekeeping issues, very clean area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-201.2 Page 240 of 451
Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YN NEJ UE]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No.         1-GEN-085-A               Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 782           Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Welds are painted and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No visible deterioration.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Minor cracking observed around embed plate. Does not appear to be adverse seismic condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?             YN NEI' U-    N/A[:
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NO UI- N/AZ oxidation?
Welds are painted and in good condition. No visible deterioration.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NO UI- N/AZ Minor cracking observed around embed plate. Does not appearto be adverse seismic condition.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YU NO U-' N/AOl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.
Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE    NEI UCZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NEI' U- N/A[: YZ NO UI- N/AZ YN NO UI- N/AZ YU NO U-' N/AOl YE NEI UCZ 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 241 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-A Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 241 of 451
Adequate clearance around equipment 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-A                 Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Interaction Effects
Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UEZ N/AEl Adequate clearancearound equipment
Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025).
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil] U-I N/A[
Safety chains/wire on all lights.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UEZ N/AEl YZ Nil] U-I N/A[YZ NEI UL- N/AZ YN NEI UZ Other Adverse Conditions
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded. Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025). Safety chains/wire on all lights.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UL- N/AZ Electricalconnections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good. (2) light bulbs overhead are out.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 242 of 451 Status: YN NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1B Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good. (2) light bulbs overhead are out.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-2-2012 Page 242 of 451
Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YN NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ N[_2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B                       Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 782           Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Welds are painted and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YZ N[_
No visible deterioration
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Minor cracking observed around embed plate. Does not appear to be adverse seismic condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YN NO U[1 N/AD3 Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YED NEI UD- N/ADl oxidation?
Welds are painted and in good condition. No visible deterioration
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NDI UDI  N/AD Minor cracking observed aroundembed plate. Does not appearto be adverse seismic condition.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI U[] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.
Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.
YN NO U[1 N/AD3 YED NEI UD- N/ADl YN NDI UDI N/AD YZ NEI U[] N/AD 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 243 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set lB Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 243 of 451
Adequate clearance around equipment.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B             Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set lB Interaction Effects
Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI U-I N/Al Adequate clearance around equipment.
Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025).
Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded. Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025). Safety chains/wire on all lights.
Safety chains/wire on all lights.9. Do -attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U-I N/Al YE NEI Ur N/AO-YE NEI UE N/A[E]YN NO UE[[Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do -attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NEI UE N/A[E]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Electricalconnections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NO UE[[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y0 NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-2-2012 8-2-2012 Page 244 of 451 Status: YZ NI:] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel I Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-2-2012 Page 244 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YZ NI:] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YEr NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D                 Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel I Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Welded to embed plate in floor; appears to be free of damage (observed on outside of cabinet).
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified as well as the panel-to-panel connections.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Front panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEr      NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No visible corrosion.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?               YE N[-] UE] N/A[l Welded to embed plate in floor; appearsto be free of damage (observed on outside of cabinet). Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified as well as the panel-to-panel connections. Front panels required extensive disassembly to open.
All surfaces painted and in good condition 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YO NEI UI- N/A[-
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
oxidation?
YE N[-] UE] N/A[l YO NEI UI- N/A[-YN NEI UI] N/A[]YE] N[3 UE] N/A2 YE NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No visible corrosion.All surfaces painted and in good condition
Page 245 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YN NEI UI] N/A[]
Scaffolding in close proximity to panel on west end (-3/4" clearance).
No visible cracks in concrete.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YE] N[3 UE] N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YE NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 245 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D           Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YO N-] U-I N/AE-Scaffolding in close proximity to panel on west end (-3/4" clearance).
After further review, the clearance was deemed satisfactory.
After further review, the clearance was deemed satisfactory.
YO N-] U-I N/AE-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE-] UI-1 N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YZ NE-] UI-1 N/A[
Overhead cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible electrical connections at top of panel/cabinet.
Overhead cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition. No masonry block walls present.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NE-1 UE- N/AZ-YN N[-] UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YN NE-1 UE- N/AZ-Flexible electricalconnections at top of panel/cabinet.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YN N[-] UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YN NE] U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Light burnt out in south-east corner and center of room. Scaffolding in close proximity to emergency light battery. Could impact seat angle/support, but not significant seismic impact.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 9-28-2012 Phillib York Page 246 of 451 S t atus: YEI NO UIIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003 Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description Distribution BD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Location:
Light burnt out in south-east corner and center of room. Scaffolding in close proximity to emergency light battery. Could impact seat angle/support, but not significant seismic impact.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                 7-26-2012 Phillib York                                                                9-28-2012 Page 246 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
S t atus: YEI NO UIIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Y-- NIE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware appears to be in place and in good condition (observed from inside cabinet/panel).
Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003                   Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description DistributionBD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Location: Bldg. CNTL               Floor El. 755             Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Cabinet base is bolted to channel that is welded to embed plate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All items are painted. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y-- NIE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YZ NEI UE- N/AZ YN N[-1 U[D N/A[-Z Y0 NEI U[-1 N/AZ YE- NEI U-] N/AN YZ NEI U[]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YZ NEI UE- N/AZ All hardware appearsto be in place and in good condition (observed from inside cabinet/panel). Cabinet base is bolted to channel that is welded to embed plate.
Page 247 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003 Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description Distribution BD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YN N[-1 U[D N/A[-Z oxidation?
Observed printer and drawing table in the aisle way adjacent to the equipment that is not properly restrained.
All items are painted. No corrosion observed.
Could potentially impact breaker switches on front of panel.YE- NO U[- N/AEF 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEi ULI N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       Y0 NEI U[-1 N/AZ No significantcracks observed.
No masonry walls present. Ceiling tiles and lights are properly restrained.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YE- NEI U-] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All other items are well restrained.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NEI U[]
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YM NE) U-1 N/AE-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 247 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003             Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description DistributionBD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YE- NO U[- N/AEF Observed printerand drawing table in the aisle way adjacent to the equipment that is not properly restrained.Could potentially impact breakerswitches on front of panel.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEi ULI N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. Ceiling tiles and lights are properly restrained.All other items are well restrained.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YM NE) U-1 N/AE-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YO NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-10-2012 8-10-2012 Page 248 of 451 Status: YE N-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-OOO1-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Distribution Panel 0 Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                8-10-2012 Page 248 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Status: YE N-- U--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-OOO1-D                 Equip. Class3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I DistributionPanel 0 Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No loose, missing, or damaged.YO NEI Uil N/AZ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Clean and painted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Wall mounted, no visible cracks in concrete or damage.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YN Nil U-- N/A[Z YI NiZ UZ-1 N/AZl YZ-1 NEI UZ N/AZ YN Nil UE--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?             YO NEI Uil N/AZ No loose, missing, or damaged.
Page 249 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-O001-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Distribution Panel 0 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN Nil U-- N/A[Z oxidation?
Scaffolding pick board in close proximity to flex connection on top of panel (-2'), credible but not significant.
Clean and painted.
YE NE] UL- N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YI  NiZ UZ-1 N/AZl Wall mounted, no visible cracks in concrete or damage.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ-1 NEI UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN Nil UE--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 249 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-O001-D             Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I DistributionPanel 0 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YE NE] UL- N/AE]
Scaffolding pick boardin close proximity to flex connection on top of panel (-2'), credible but not significant.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YZ NE] UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition.
Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible electrical connections on top of cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI Ur] N/AZ YE NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YZ NEI Ur] N/AZ Flexible electricalconnections on top of cabinet.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YE NEI UE]
Door is missing bolts but appears to be closed securely.
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Missing bolts are for shipping and transport; they are not required for operation.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NEI] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Door is missing bolts but appears to be closed securely. Missing bolts are for shipping and transport;they are not requiredfor operation.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good..Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-26-2012 7-26-2012 9-28-2012 Phillipo York Page 250 of 451 S t atus: YE NEI U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board 1/11 Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good..
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                7-26-2012 Phillipo York                                                              9-28-2012 Page 250 of 451
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y19 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus: YE NEI U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board 1/11 Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Mounted to a steel frame. Box is bolted to the frame and the bolts are in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Frame is welded to embed, welds in good condition as well.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y19 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
All surfaces painted or galvanized.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?           YZ NEI U-1 N/AL]
No corrosion present.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Steel frame is welded to embed and no cracks are visible.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Mounted to a steel frame. Box is bolted to the frame and the bolts are in good condition. Frame is welded to embed, welds in good condition as well.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI U-] N/AE3 oxidation?
All surfaces painted or galvanized. No corrosionpresent.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UI- N/AL]
Steel frame is welded to embed and no cracks are visible.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI U[-] N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.
Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NE] UE]
All is in very good condition with good housekeeping observed.YZ NEI U-1 N/AL]YZ NEI U-] N/AE3 YO NEI UI- N/AL]YZ NEI U[-] N/All YZ NE] UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 251 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board s//l Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All is in very good condition with good housekeeping observed.
No nearby equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Hood in place overhead.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 251 of 451
No masonry walls. Cable tray is rigidly supported.
 
Fire protection piping is rigidly supported as well.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, conduits are flexible type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UD' N/AZ YZ NE] Ur-] N/ADI YZ N[-] UD- N/AD YZ NEI- Ur Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches s//l 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board Equipment Description Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UD' N/AZ No nearby equipment. Hood in place overhead.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] Ur-] N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls. Cable tray is rigidly supported. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported as well.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ N[-] UD- N/AD Yes, conduits are flexible type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI- Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-25-2012 7-25-2012 Page 252 of 451 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            7-25-2012 Page 252 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware appears to be in place and in new condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YN NEI U-] N/AZ All hardware appearsto be in place and in new condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NEI U-] N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized.
All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NO UI] N/AZ No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YJE NEI U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.
Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE]
Rigid frame welded to embeds in the floor. Cabinet is bolted to the frame.YN NEI U-] N/AZ YO NEI U-] N/AZ YN NO UI] N/AZ YJE NEI U-] N/AZ YZ NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 253 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Charqers 7S/9S Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Rigid frame welded to embeds in the floor. Cabinetis bolted to the frame.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 253 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC TransferSwitch Select Charqers 7S/9S Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI Ur- N/A[:]
Has a protective hood over it and no other items are in close proximity.
Has a protective hood over it and no other items are in close proximity.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEIr  UZ N/AL]
No masonry walls present. All items above are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Two conduit connections are hard tube conduit. After further consideration and review with FRC, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI Ur- N/A[:]YO NEIr UZ N/AL]YI NEI Ur] N/AEl YZ N[-1 U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
No masonry walls present. All items above are rigidly mounted.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YI  NEI Ur] N/AEl Two conduit connections are hard tube conduit. After further considerationand review with FRC, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ N[-1 U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI Ur--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Wood form work correctly in place for new cabling. Work in-progress.
Wood form work correctly in place for new cabling. Work in-progress.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Some housekeeping issues related to in progress work. Nothing of significance.
Some housekeeping issues relatedto in progress work. Nothing of significance.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 254 of 451 S t atus: YE NE!] U[I]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-235-O001-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-1 Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-26-2012 Page 254 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Wallkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t atus: YE NE!] U[I]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-235-O001-D                   Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-1 Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757           Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Welded to embed plate in floor; appears to be free of damage (observed on outside of cabinet).
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Wallkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
The power boards exist in one continuous cabinet and no panel-to-panel anchorage was observed.Front panels required extensive disassembly to open.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No visible corrosion.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?             YN N-        UL- N/AO Welded to embed plate in floor; appears to be free of damage (observedon outside of cabinet). Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified. The power boards exist in one continuous cabinet and no panel-to-panel anchoragewas observed.
All surfaces painted and in good condition.
Front panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YN NEI UE1 N/ACl oxidation?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No visible corrosion.All surfaces painted and in good condition.
YO NZ YN N- UL- N/AO YN NEI UE1 N/ACl YN NEI UL- N/AZ YO NO UL- N/A0 YE NO- U 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YN NEI UL- N/AZ No visible cracks in concrete.
Page 255 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YO NO UL- N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Scaffolding pole near conduit/flex connection on top of cabinet. After further consideration, deemed not to be a significant spatial interaction.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE NO- U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
However, it does not meet the requirements of MMTP- 102.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible electrical connections.
Page 255 of 451
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NE] UE- N/AZ Y[ NEI U-I N/AZ YE NE] U'-Z N/AZl YER NZ-] U--Other Adverse Conditions 11 .Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No.     1-BD-235-0001-D         Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YO NE] UE- N/AZ Scaffolding pole near conduit/flex connection on top of cabinet. After further consideration,deemed not to be a significantspatial interaction.
However, it does not meet the requirementsof MMTP- 102.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[    NEI U-I N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YE NE] U'-Z N/AZl Flexible electrical connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YER NZ-] U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 11 . Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE NE] U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 256 of 451 Status: Y NEi ULM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BD-278-MO07B Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-26-2012 Page 256 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: Y     NEi ULM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YI- NED 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
Equipment ID No.         1-BD-278-MO07B           Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 755           Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YO N[-O U-] N/AEl YN NEI UE- N/AZ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UrI N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YI- NOI U-] N/AH YN NEI U--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?               YO N[-O U-] N/AEl
Page 257 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BD-278-MOO7B Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YN NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?
YO NIh U[I N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UI- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YEI NEI UrI N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NUl UU1 N/AU-YE NI U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YI- NOI U-] N/AH (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NUI UI-U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YN NEI U--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 257 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-BD-278-MOO7B         Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YO NIh U[I N/AU
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UI- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YS NUl UU1 N/AU-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YI   NUI UI-U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Page 258 of 451 S t atus: YN NEI UF-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0001-D Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                 7-19-2012 Page 258 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-027 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk.down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
St atus: YN NEI UF-]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YEI NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is in very good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0001-D                 Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-027 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk.down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All surfaces are painted and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UEI N/AI-The anchorageis in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
YZ NEI UEI N/AI-YI NEI UE- N/A--YO NEI UE- N/AZ-YE1 NEI UE- N/AZ YZ NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YI    NEI UE- N/A--
Page 259 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-BA T-236-OO01-D Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
All items have adequate clearance.
All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.
YZ NEI U-I N/ArI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U- N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UE- N/AZ-No observed cracks.
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All cables have additional length to allow for flexibility.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE1 NEI    UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UZ N/AZI YER NEI U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
The room is clear of temporary equipment.
Page 259 of 451
Wood scaffolding is present but adequately restrained.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-BA T-236-OO01-D           Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI   U-I N/ArI All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-     N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO NEI UZ N/AZI All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YER NEI U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The room is clear of temporary equipment. Wood scaffolding is present but adequatelyrestrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent.
Housekeeping is excellent.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-2-2012 8-2-2012 Page 260 of 451 Status: YE NEI U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0002-E Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery II Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-2-2012 Page 260 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-028 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Status: YE NEI U[-
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[1 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is in very good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0002-E                 Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery II Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-028 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All surfaces are painted and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.YZ NEI UD- N/AD--YZ NEI U-- N/AD1 YZ ND-] UE- N/AD-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[1 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI    UD- N/AD--
YDI NDI UD- N/AN YS NEI UD 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
The anchorageis in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
Page 261 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0002-E Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery //interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI U-- N/AD1 oxidation?
All items have adequate clearance.
All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosionobserved.
YN NEI UZ- N/AZI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NR UI-] N/AZ]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ ND-] UE- N/AD-No observed cracks.
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All cables have additional length to allow for flexibility.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YDI NDI UD- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NZI UZ1 N/AZI Y[ NO U[: Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YS NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NZI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 261 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0002-E           Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery //
interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI UZ- N/AZI All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NR UI-] N/AZ]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NZI UZ1 N/AZI All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y[  NO U[:
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[R NZI   UZ--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The room is clear of temporary equipment.
The room is clear of temporary equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent.
Housekeeping is excellent.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 262 of 451 S t atus: YE NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-2-2012 Page 262 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-029 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
S t atus: YE NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y. = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the ilem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0003-F                 Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-029 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage is in very good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y. = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces are painted and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the ilem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NE] UEr N/A[Z The anchorage is in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Y[! NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?
YZ NE] UEr N/A[Z Y[! NEI UE- N/AZ YO NE] UZ] N/AZ YE] NEI UE] N/A[K YN NEI- Ur 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.
Page 263 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NE] UZ] N/AZ No observed cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE] NEI UE] N/A[K (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YN NEI- Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 263 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0003-F           Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YZ NCI UE- N/A[
All items have adequate clearance.
All items have adequate clearance.
YZ NCI UE- N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NO- UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YIE NO- UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All cables have additional length to allow for flexibility.
Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NOI Ur- N/AZ YS NEI UE" Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YZ NOI Ur- N/AZ All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO-] UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YS NEI UE" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YZ NO-] UZ--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The room is clear of temporary equipment.
The room is clear of temporary equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent.
Housekeeping is excellent. (2) light fixtures contain burnt out light bulbs.
(2) light fixtures contain burnt out light bulbs.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-2-2012 8-2-2012 Page 264 of 451 Status: Yt NEIl Ul--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator Battery 1A-A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                8-2-2012 Page 264 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: Yt NEIl Ul--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YEI NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware in good condition, appears to be set properly and tight.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A                     Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery 1A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area Q104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A             = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI  NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YN NEi    UE" N/A[Z All hardware in good condition, appears to be set properly and tight.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NE U[L] N/AEZ oxidation?
No visible corrosion.
No visible corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracking (majority of concrete covered by rack base plate).YN NEi UE" N/A[Z YZ NE U[L] N/AEZ YZ NEI UE] N/A]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI UE] N/A]
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No visible cracking (majority of concrete covered by rack base plate).
YEI NEI UE- N/AZ YI NEI U-'3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YEI NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 265 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator Battery lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YI NEI U-'
Closest equipment is panel mounted on wall (greater than 1" clearance)
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment..
Hood/structure mounted above rack.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible battery connections.
Page 265 of 451
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI U[[ N/A[[YO NE] UL-] N/A[Z YS NEI UE] N/A[Z Y[ NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A               Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery lA-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI U[[    N/A[[
Closest equipment is panel mounted on wall (greaterthan 1" clearance)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE] UL-] N/A[Z and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Hood/structure mounted above rack.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NEI UE] N/A[Z Flexible battery connections.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y[  NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NE] U[-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General good housekeeping Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 266 of 451 S t atus: YE NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-B-B Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator Battery 1B-B Location:
Generalgood housekeeping Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012 Page 266 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St atus: YE NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-B-B                     Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery 1B-B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742             Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YlI NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken hardware.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Could not touch equipment-trip hazard-nothing looked loose.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YlI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NE] UE] N/AE' No loose, missing, or broken hardware. Could not touch equipment-trip hazard-nothinglooked loose.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           Y[    NEI U[] N/AE]
oxidation?
There is mild surface corrosion, not significant.
There is mild surface corrosion, not significant.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Some observed hairline cracking at south grounding lug connection.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
No observed structural cracks near anchorage  
Some observed hairline cracking at south grounding lug connection. No observed structuralcracks near anchorage > 0. 5mm
> 0. 5mm 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE] NEI    U0- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE]
YO NE] UE] N/AE'Y[ NEI U[] N/AE]YZ NEI UE] N/AE]YE] NEI U0- N/AZ YZ NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 267 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-BA T-2 15-B-B Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator BatterV lB-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Plastic barricade poles observed in the area-but not significant.
Page 267 of 451
YS NEI UE-1 N/Al[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UrI N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Batteries and the rack are protected by an overhead plate steel ventilation hood. No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All cabling has loops allowing flexibility.
Equipment ID No. 1-BA T-2 15-B-B         Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator BatterV lB-B Interaction Effects
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI UL- N/AL YZ NLE UI-Other Adverse Conditions
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YS NEI UE-1 N/Al[
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEl UL--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Plastic barricadepoles observed in the area-butnot significant.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UrI N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Batteries and the rack are protected by an overhead plate steel ventilation hood. No masonry walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NEI UL- N/AL All cabling has loops allowing flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NLE UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEl UL--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping, no concerns.
Good housekeeping, no concerns. All components in the area are rigidly mounted.
All components in the area are rigidly mounted.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 268 of 451 S t.a..: YE NEI U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-OOO1-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger!Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 268 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St .a..: YE NEI U[-
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ NLI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Everything is in good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-OOO1-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger!
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772             Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
No corrosion.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NLI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.YZ N-] UE-" N/A[YZ NEI UEI N/AE3 YZ Nil UEI N/AE-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ N-] UE-" N/A[
Everything is in good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI UEI N/AE3 oxidation?
All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ Nil UEI N/AE-No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ NEI UZ- N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCA 53437-427 and 53437-428.
Verified per DCA 53437-427 and 53437-428.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Very good housekeeping conditions.
Very good housekeeping conditions.
YZ NEI UZ- N/A[YZ NEI U[-1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 269 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 269 of 451
Scaffolding horizontal pole in close proximity with flexible conduit on south face of charger.YZ NEI UE1 N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UEr N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Covered by a structural steel frame and hood.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit is utilized.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE- N/AZ YM NEI U-I Other.Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery ChargerI Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UZ-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UE1 N/AZ Scaffolding horizontalpole in close proximity with flexible conduit on south face of charger.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UEr N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Covered by a structuralsteel frame and hood.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NEI UE- N/AZ Flex conduit is utilized.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YM NEI U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other.Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YM NEI UZ-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 270 of 451 S t a t us: YE NEI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery CharQers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger Ill Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-25-2012 Page 270 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk:down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St a tus: YE NEI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery CharQersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery ChargerIll Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk:down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage appears to be in place and in new condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NE] UE- N/AZ All anchorageappears to be in place and in new condition.
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.YO NE] UE- N/AZ YZ NEI UZ-' N/AZ YZ NEI U-' N/An 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YZ NEI UZ-' N/AZ oxidation?
All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YZ NEI U-' N/An No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YZ Nil UZ- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCAs 53437-427 and 53437-428.
Verified per DCAs 53437-427 and 53437-428.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y ! NEI U[--
YZ Nil UZ- N/AZl Y ! NEI U[--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 271 of 451 Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger IIl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Nothing in proximity of soft areas of equipment.
Page 271 of 451
No proximity interactions expected.YED NEI UE- N/A-1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Nil ULi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Lights are safely chained. Area heater above equipment is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections are flex conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS Nil UI[] N/A[l YS NEl UI-Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger IIl Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YED NEI UE- N/A-1 Nothing in proximity of soft areas of equipment. No proximity interactions expected.
None observed.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Nil ULi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Housekeeping is good. Light directly over the equipment is burnt out. Another fixture 10' north of the equipment is burnt out as well.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-26-2012 7-26-2012 Page 272 of 451 S t atus: YE] NZ UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-O001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter 0-1 Location:
Lights are safely chained. Area heaterabove equipment is rigidly mounted.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS Nil UI[] N/A[l Connections are flex conduit type.
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NEl UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No missing, damaged, or loose (like new condition).
None observed.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good. Light directly over the equipment is burnt out. Another fixture 10' north of the equipment is burnt out as well.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                7-26-2012 Page 272 of 451
 
St atus: YE] NZ UE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-O001-D                 Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter0-1 Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?             YN NEI Ur- N/A[l No missing, damaged, or loose (like new condition).
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YZ NEIl UI N/AZ-oxidation?
All surfaces painted or galvanized.
All surfaces painted or galvanized.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YE NEI UZ] N/AZ No visible cracks in concrete.
Bolt spacing on front of inverter does not meet the tolerance requirement indicated on DCA 51370-517.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             Y[L] NE    Ur- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Bolt spacing on front of inverterdoes not meet the tolerance requirement indicated on DCA 51370-517.
YN NEI Ur- N/A[l YZ NEIl UI N/AZ-YE NEI UZ] N/AZ Y[L] NE Ur- N/AZ YN NEI U[I 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 273 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter 0-1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Covered by structural steel and sheet metal. Adequate clearance around equipment all around.Y(9 NEI U-I N/AI-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI N--] UI-] N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 273 of 451
HVAC and cable tray rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections rigidly mounted near floor.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI UF1 N/AEl YZ NEI UE'Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI N[-] UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-0001-D           Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter 0-1 Interaction Effects
No adverse seismic conditions observed.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y(9 NEI U-I N/AI-Covered by structuralsteel and sheet metal. Adequate clearance aroundequipment all around.
Housekeeping is good and orderly.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 274 of 451 Strarus: YN NE!1 UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-CHGR-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Batter, Charger Location:
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI   N--] UI-] N/A[]
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
HVAC and cable tray rigidly mounted.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NEI UF1 N/AEl Electrical connections rigidly mounted near floor.
YE- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware/anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.3.. Is the anchorage.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UE' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Other Adverse Conditions
All surface are painted or galvanized.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YI   N[-] UI--
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 YI NEI UE- N/All YZ NEI UEr N/Ar-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No adverse seismic conditions observed.
YE' NEI UE] N/AZ YZ NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Page 275 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-CHGR-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Battery Charger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Housekeeping is good and orderly.
The only soft targets are the electrical connections and switches on the front panel. All have adequate clearance.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-25-2012 Page 274 of 451
Y10 NEI UI- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UZ- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
All items above are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connections are flexible conduit type.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEi U[: N/AZl YN NEI UEi Other Adverse Conditions
Strarus: YN NE!1 UE]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         1-CHGR-215-A-A           Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Batter,Charger Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 All hardware/anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
3.. Is the anchorage. free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YI  NEI UE- N/All oxidation?
All surface are painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI UEr   N/Ar-No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE' NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 275 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-CHGR-215-A-A               Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Battery Charger Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y10 NEI UI- N/AZ The only soft targets are the electricalconnections and switches on the front panel. All have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI     UZ- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All items above are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NEi U[: N/AZl Electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NEI UZ--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good in this area. Plastic barricade is present but not a significant issue.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 276 of 451 S t a t us: YE NEI UIII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-I Location:
Housekeeping is very good in this area. Plastic barricadeis present but not a significantissue.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-6-2012 Page 276 of 451
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St a tus: YE NEI UIII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing or damaged parts. All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
Equipment ID No.         1-INV-235-0001-D         Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-I Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
No corrosion.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Excellent housekeeping.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI      UE- N/AZ No missing or damaged parts.All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
All surface painted or galvanized.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI UL] N/A--
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.YZ NEI UE- N/AZ YO NEI UL] N/A--YN NEI UE- N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
oxidation?
No corrosion. Excellent housekeeping.All surface painted or galvanized.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NEI UE- N/AZ No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YN NEI UZ3 N/AZ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCAs 51370-114 and 51370-135.
Verified per DCAs 51370-114 and 51370-135.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No adverse conditions observed.YN NEI UZ3 N/AZ-YN NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No adverse conditions observed.
Page 277 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-OO01-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 277 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-OO01-D           Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-1 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YN NEI U-1 N/AE]
Covered by a hood. No items are close enough for spatial interactions.
Covered by a hood. No items are close enough for spatial interactions.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls. Lights have safety chains. All items above are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electrical connection utilizes flex conduit.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-1 N/AE]YN NEI U-] N/AZ YN NEI U-] N/Al]YZ N[] UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
No masonry walls. Lights have safety chains. All items above are rigidly mounted.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI    U-] N/Al]
Scaffolding in the immediate area, but properly restrained.
Electricalconnection utilizes flex conduit.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ N[] UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NE] UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffolding in the immediate area, but properlyrestrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Very good housekeeping, no adverse conditions observed.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 278 of 451 Status: YN N[-] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-//Location:
Very good housekeeping, no adverse conditions observed.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-25-2012 Page 278 of 451
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YN N[-] U[-
YN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All items present and in new condition.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E                 Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-//
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Normal floor cracking is present. Nothing significant observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UI- N/AEl All items present and in new condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YED N[l ULi N/Al1 oxidation?
No corrosion observed.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YO NEI Uil N/A[l Normal floor cracking is present. Nothing significant observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YN NEI ULi N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DCA 51370-214.
Verified per DCA 51370-214.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YED NO UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI UI- N/AEl YED N[l ULi N/Al1 YO NEI Uil N/A[l YN NEI ULi N/AEl YED NO UEi 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 279 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Inverter 1-/l Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 279 of 451
All items have adequate clearance.
 
YZ NE] UL- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-I N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E       Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Inverter 1-/l Interaction Effects
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All other items are rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NE] UL- N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
Smoke detector with missing cable.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections are low at anchorage point. No differential motion expected.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UEr N/AE]YZ N[] UE]Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI   U-I N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.All other items are rigidly supported. Smoke detector with missing cable.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NEI UEr    N/AE]
Connections are low at anchoragepoint. No differential motion expected.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ N[] UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NE] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequate restraint.
There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequate restraint.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Housekeeping is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 280 of 451 Status: YO] NM UL!Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-1l Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-8-2012 Page 280 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A 864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YO] NM UL!
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YZ N[:]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All hardware is in new condition.
Equipment ID No.       1-INV-235-0003-F         Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-1l Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 772           Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)             AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YZ N[:]
No corrosion.
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI U-] N/A[l All hardware is in new condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEI U-] N/AEj oxidation?
All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y[  NI    U[-] N/AE3 No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           Y-- NO U-] N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchor spacing shown on DCA 51370-314 does not match as-built condition.
Anchor spacing shown on DCA 51370-314 does not match as-built condition.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ Nr] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The cabinet is welded to angles that are anchor bolted to the floor.All are in new condition.
The cabinet is welded to angles that are anchorbolted to the floor.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
All are in new condition.
YZ NEI U-] N/A[l YN NEI U-] N/AEj Y[ NI U[-] N/AE3 Y-- NO U-] N/AE3 YZ Nr] UD Page 281 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-Ill Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No equipment or structure within close proximity.
Page 281 of 451
YO NE] U[-] N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1 NEI UE- N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
No masonry walls. Lights are safety cabled. HVAC is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes, conduit is flex type and other connections are low at the floor where the movement would be the same.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] UZ- N/AZ-YZ NEI UZi.Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0003-F           Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-Ill Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NE] U[-] N/AZ No equipment or structure within close proximity.
Scaffolding in the general area, however it is adequately restrained.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1 NEI     UE- N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls. Lights are safety cabled. HVAC is rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YZ NE] UZ- N/AZ-Yes, conduit is flex type and other connections are low at the floor where the movement would be the same.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI UZi.
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffolding in the generalarea, however it is adequately restrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent.
Housekeeping is excellent.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 282 of 451 S t atus: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A 1-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1A I Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-26-2012 Page 282 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
S t atus: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A 1-A                 Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1A I Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742             Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Clean/painted in very good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Clean and painted, no observable rust.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observable cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI U[1- N/AZ Clean/paintedin very good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UL] N/AEl oxidation?
Clean and painted, no observable rust.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI UE N/AZl No observable cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NO! UE- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NEI U[1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
YZ NEI YZ NEI U[1- N/AZ YZ NEI UL] N/AEl YZ NEI UE N/AZl YZ NO! UE- N/AZl YZ NEI U[1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 283 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A1-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine IA I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 283 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A1-A             Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine IA I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YN Ni    Ur  N/A[--
There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UD N/AL!
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.YN Ni Ur N/A[--YS NEI UD N/AL!YED NEI Ur- N/A YN NEIU[-Other Adverse Conditions
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO- ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YED NEI Ur- N/A All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YN NEIU[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YE NO- ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained.
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained. Good housekeeping practices have been implemented.
Good housekeeping practices have been implemented.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                   Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-17-2012 Page 284 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 284 of 451 Status: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1A2 Location:
 
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: YZ NEI U--
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A                   Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1A2 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Clean/painted in very good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Clean and painted, no observable rust.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observable cracks.YN NEI YO NO- ULI N/AOl YO NEI U-] N/AL!YZ NE3 U['- N/AL!5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NO- ULI N/AOl Clean/paintedin very good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI U-] N/AL!
oxidation?
Clean and painted, no observable rust.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NE3 U['- N/AL!
No observable cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI UE! N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YED NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
YZ NEI UE! N/AZl YED NEI UE3 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 285 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1A2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 285 of 451
There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A             Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1A2 Interaction Effects
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YO NE-1 UI1 N/AZ There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.YO NE-1 UI1 N/AZ YZ N[l UF-1 N/AZ YN N[-] UEI N/AZ YZ NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YZ N[l UF-1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YN N[-] UEI N/AZ All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YZ NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YS NEI   UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained.
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained.Good housekeeping practices have been implemented.
Good housekeeping practices have been implemented.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-17-2012 Page 286 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 286 of 451 Status: YN NEI UR-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B1-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine IBI Location:
 
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: YN NEI UR-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Equipment ID No.         1-DIEG-082-B1-B           Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine IBI Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742             Room, Area Q106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is present and painted. Nothing damaged.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UL- N/AL!
All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YED NEI U[] N/AE]
oxidation?
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YC9 NEI UF'] N/AE]
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No observed cracks.
YED NEI YO NEI UL- N/AL!YED NEI U[] N/AE]YC9 NEI UF'] N/AE]YE NEI UFI N/AL1 YO NEl UE1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NEI UFI N/AL1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 287 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B1-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1BI Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
All items are adequate and or rigidly supported:
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEl UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YO NE-J Ut- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Page 287 of 451
No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NZI UZ1 N/AZl YS NEI U[--Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B1-B         Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1BI Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NE-J Ut-  N/AZ All items are adequate and or rigidly supported: There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur     N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present.All lights are equipped with safety cables.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YN NZI UZ1 N/AZl All connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YS NEI U[--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 288 of 451 S t 8 t..: YN NM~ U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B2-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1B2 Location:
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 288 of 451
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St8 t..: YN NM~ U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is present and painted. Nothing damaged.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B2-B                   Equip. Class3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1B2 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[i of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NE UI- N/AEl All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YN NEI U[] N/A[l oxidation?
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN NEI UI- N/AEl No observed cracks.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YN NE-- UZJ N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YN N[i YO NE UI- N/AEl YN NEI U[] N/A[l YN NEI UI- N/AEl YN NE-- UZJ N/AEl YO NEl UEl 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
Page 289 of 451 Equipment ID No. i-DIEG-082-B2-B Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1B2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEl UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?
All items are adequate and or rigidly supported.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
Page 289 of 451
YED NEI UI- N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UUI N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NEI UUl N/AUl YO NEI UEU Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. i-DIEG-082-B2-B             Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1B2 Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YED NEI UI- N/A[l All items are adequate and or rigidly supported. There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UUI N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE    NEI UUl N/AUl All connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YO NEI UEU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-31-2012 7-31-2012 Page 290 of 451 Status: YE N[-] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIA-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 1A-A Location:
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-31-2012 Page 290 of 451
GM/Porter (Electric Product Division)Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YE N[-] U-]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Clean/painted in very good condition.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIA-A                 Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator1A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               GM/Porter(Electric ProductDivision)
Clean and painted, no observable rust.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observable cracks.YN NEI YN NIl Ur] N/Ar-YO NEI U[I] N/AL-YE Ni-] U-I N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one     YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YN NIl Ur] N/Ar-Clean/paintedin very good condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YO NEI U[I] N/AL-oxidation?
Clean and painted, no observable rust.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YE Ni-] U-I N/AZ No observable cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YN NZI UZ- N/AZ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YN NEI U[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
There were no observed adverse seismic conditions.
YN NZI UZ- N/AZ-YN NEI U[]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 291 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOO1A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator lA-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 291 of 451
There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOO1A-A             Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator lA-A Interaction Effects
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YE NEI U-] N/AEl There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.YE NEI U-] N/AEl YZ NEI UD] N/AE3 YZ NEI U'- N/AL]YE N[l UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,     YZ NEI UD] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YZ NEI  U'- N/AL]
All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free         YE N[l UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted.
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YS NEI UI--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained.
Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained. Good housekeeping practiceshave been implemented.
Good housekeeping practices have been implemented.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                     Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                7-17-2012 Page 292 of 451
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-17-2012 7-17-2012 Page 292 of 451 Status: YZ N -UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 1B-B Location:
 
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: YZ N - UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator1B-B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is present and painted. Nothing damaged.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI Ui- N/AEl All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YO NIl U-- N/A[Z oxidation?
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YN N[] UI- N/A[
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No observed cracks.
YZ NEI YO NEI Ui- N/AEl YO NIl U-- N/A[Z YN N[] UI- N/A[YE NEI U-- N/AEl YZ NEI Ur]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE NEI  U-- N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 293 of 451 Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 1B-B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
All items are adequate and or rigidly supported.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI Ur]
There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.Temperature sensor overhead is not safety cabled as noted in area walk-by (WBN-WB-021).
Page 293 of 451
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] UE- N/A[YS NEI UI- N/AZI YO NE-] UE- N/Al]YI NE] UEr Other Adverse Conditions
 
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B       Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 1B-B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NE] UE- N/A[
All items are adequate and or rigidly supported. There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UI- N/AZI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.
Temperature sensor overhead is not safety cabled as noted in area walk-by (WBN-WB-021).
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO NE-] UE- N/Al]
All connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YI  NE] UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NEI   ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 294 of 451 S t.a.u: Y[ NR U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2A-A Location:
Good housekeeping observed, very clean area.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q105, WBN-WB-022 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 294 of 451
Parsons Peebles Electric Product Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St .a.u: Y[ NR U[-
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is present and painted. Nothing damaged.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
All surfaces are painted. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A                 Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area Q105, WBN-WB-022 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ParsonsPeebles Electric Product Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Y[ NEI YO NEI U[] N/A[Z]YO NEI UL- N/AZ YZ N[[] U"I N/AU YZ NEI U[] N/AZ YO NEI U-'3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y[    NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Page 295 of 451 Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2A-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YO NEI U[] N/A[Z]
All items have adequate clearance for proximity interactions.
All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
All items are rigidly mounted.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse .onto the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YO NEI UL- N/AZ oxidation?
Temperature sensor at north end of the A2 engine does not have a safety cable. Everything else is rigidly supported, no masonry walls, lights have cables.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All pipe and conduit connections are flexible 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEl U-1 N/AEl YZ NEI Ur1 N/AZl YZ Nil Ui- N/AZl Y0 NEI Ur1 Other Adverse Conditions
All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[r]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YZ N[[] U"I N/AU No observed cracks.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YZ NEI U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI U-'
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 295 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A             Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2A-A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEl U-1 N/AEl All items have adequate clearance for proximity interactions.All items are rigidly mounted.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI    Ur1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse .onto the equipment?
Temperature sensor at north end of the A2 engine does not have a safety cable. Everything else is rigidly supported, no masonry walls, lights have cables.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YZ Nil Ui- N/AZl All pipe and conduit connections are flexible
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y0 NEI Ur1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NEI U[r]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good. Scaffolding installed over the south end of the A l engine. No spatial interactions observed.
Housekeeping is very good. Scaffolding installed over the south end of the A l engine. No spatial interactionsobserved. Observed 2" clearance to fuel pipe, not a concern.
Observed 2" clearance to fuel pipe, not a concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 296 of 451  
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 296 of 451
&:.t..: YI Ni[ Ul-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2B-B Location:
 
Bldg. OG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q107, WBN-WB-023 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
                                                                                              &:.t..: YI Ni[ Ul-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
The Electric Products Division Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk-down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B                 Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2B-B Location: Bldg. OG BLDG             Floor El. 742           Room, Area Q107, WBN-WB-023 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               The Electric Products Division Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk-down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
YED NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is present and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 YO Nil UE- N/AE]
All surfaces are painted. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed cracks.YO Nil UE- N/AE]YZ NEI UE- N/Al]YE NE] UEI N/Al]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
All anchorageis present and in good condition.
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 YZ NEI UE- N/Al]
YO NWI UW- N/AW YN NO UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
oxidation?
Page 297 of 451 Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2B-B interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.
Relief valve on south-west accumulator is within 5/8" of rigid pipe support. Tank axial stop will allow 3/8" travel in that direction.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?         YE NE] UEI N/Al]
After further review, clearance deemed to be adequate.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No observed cracks.
No masonry walls, light fixture directly over generator is missing (broken) a safety cable. This is not significant.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?               YO NWI UW- N/AW (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All pipe and conduit connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NE-] U-1 N/A[Z YZ NDI UE- N/ADl YS NDl U-1 N/AZl YZ NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YN NO UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 297 of 451
 
Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B       Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2B-B interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YN NE-] U-1 N/A[Z Relief valve on south-west accumulatoris within 5/8" of rigid pipe support. Tank axial stop will allow 3/8" travel in that direction. After further review, clearance deemed to be adequate.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UE- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls, light fixture directly over generatoris missing (broken) a safety cable. This is not significant.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YS NDl U-1 N/AZl All pipe and conduit connections are flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YS NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is very good. Light with missing safety chain.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 298 of 451 s t atus: YN NEI UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains:
Housekeeping is very good. Light with missing safety chain.
1-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure)Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-31-2012 Page 298 of 451
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area I110, WBN-WB-011 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
s t atus: YN NEI   UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C                         Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: 1-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage is free of broken, missing, and loose.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 722           Room, Area   I110, WBN-WB-011 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO N[E UE- N/AZ1 Anchorage is free of broken, missing, and loose.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
Bolts are painted and no corrosion was present. Mounting plates have some minor surface corrosion.
Bolts are painted and no corrosion was present. Mounting plates have some minor surface corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.YO N[E UE- N/AZ1 YZ NEI UE- N/AE YE NEI U[-] N/A[Z 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI     U[-] N/A[Z No cracks observed.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YEI NEI UE- N/AZ YO NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 299 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-L-14 7/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains:
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
I-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 299 of 451
See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-01
 
: 1. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-L-14 7/C                   Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: I-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure)
Overhead smoke detector does not appear to have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.
Interaction Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit has adequate flexibility.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YN NEI Ur- N/AZ See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-01 1. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI Ur- N/AZ YZ NE UD N/AZ YN NEI UI- N/AZ YN NEI UEr Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UD N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Overheadsmoke detector does not appearto have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NEI  UI- N/AZ All conduit has adequate flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-24-2012 7-24-2012 Page 300 of 451 Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-24-2012 Page 300 of 451
I-P1-067-0434 (TravelinQ Screen Inlet Pressure)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-0 11. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C                   Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: I-P1-067-0434 (TravelinQ Screen Inlet Pressure)
Overhead smoke detector does not appear to have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.
Interaction Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduit has adequate flexibility.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YE NE UW N/A[-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE UW N/A[-YE NEI U[-1 N/AW YE NE U[ N/AW YE N[ UE[Other Adverse Conditions
See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-0 11. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] N[: UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U[-1 N/AW and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead smoke detector does not appearto have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YE NE U[      N/AW All conduit has adequate flexibility.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE N[    UE[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE] N[: UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 72-01 7-24-2012 Status: Y[ N-' U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-L-155 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               72-01 7-24-2012
0-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: Y[ N-' U--
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoranie
Equipment ID No. 0-L-155                           Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains: 0-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 713           Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing or loose hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoranie
No corrosion, bolts are painted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y[ NEi    UE] N/Ar1 No missing or loose hardware.
Y[ NEi UE] N/Ar1 YE] Ni: UE N/Ar-YE Nr-1 U[-- N/AE1 YEf NEI UE- N/AE YO NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE] Ni: UE N/Ar-oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 0-L-155 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains:
No corrosion, bolts are painted.
O-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE Nr-1 U[-- N/AE1 No visible cracking.
Adequate clearance between rack and rigid pipe support. See question 11.YE NEI UD N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEf  NEI UE- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-L-155                     Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains: O-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NEI UD N/A[]
Adequate clearance between rack and rigid pipe support. See question 11.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead piping and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.
Overhead piping and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections'to panel/rack are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y-- NDI UDI N/AD YE NO U-Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y-- NDI  UDI N/AD Connections'topanel/rack are flexible.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
There is a temporary lifting device restrained with rope to an adjacent pipe support. The planned removal date has expired. Device is adequately restrained to prevent interaction, but it is not restrained properly per TI-276.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Other Adverse Conditions
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Status: YZ\ NFD UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R127-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location:
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE] NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
There is a temporary lifting device restrainedwith rope to an adjacent pipe support. The plannedremoval date has expired. Device is adequately restrainedto prevent interaction, but it is not restrained properly per TI-276.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-23-2012
YEI NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Visible anchorage is free bent, missing or loose hardware.
 
Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjoining racks at the top inside of the cabinets.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Status: YZ\ NFD UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Welds and bolting is painted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks surrounding embed plates.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R127-A                 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 708           Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YO NEI UE N/AE YE NEI U-I N/AE YE NEI UE- N/AE YEI NE: UE[ N/AE Y- NO UE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Equipment ID No. e 1-PNLt-275-R27-A Equip. Class 3 18. instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Racks are bolted together.YE NEI U[] N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEi N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UE N/AE Visible anchorage is free bent, missing or loose hardware. Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjoining racks at the top inside of the cabinets.
Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YE NEI    U-I N/AE oxidation?
Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached conduit is flexibly attached.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y- NEI UE- N/AE YZ NEI U[: Other Adverse Conditions
Welds and bolting is painted.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[- Nn U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI    UE- N/AE No visible cracks surroundingembed plates.
Scaffolding is properly supported and secured.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NE: UE[  N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
General housekeeping is good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 81-01 8-13-2012 S tats: :YE]N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location:
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             Y-  NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment IDe No. 1-PNLt-275-R27-A           Equip. Class 3 18. instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjacent racks on outside at the top of the cabinets.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YE NEI U[] N/AE Racks are bolted together.
No visible anchorage deficiencies.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEi N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported. Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y-  NEI UE- N/AE Attached conduit is flexibly attached.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U[:
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y[- Nn U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffolding is properly supported and secured.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good in this area.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               81-01 8-13-2012
 
S tats: :YE]N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A                 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 708           Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y[I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YEI NEr  U[-1 N/AE Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjacent racks on outside at the top of the cabinets. No visible anchorage deficiencies.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YED NEI UE1 N/AE oxidation?
Welds and bolting is painted with no signs of oxidation.
Welds and bolting is painted with no signs of oxidation.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks surrounding embed plates.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI UE1 N/AE No visible cracks surroundingembed plates.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE3 NE UE N/A[E (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Y[I NZ YEI NEr U[-1 N/AE YED NEI UE1 N/AE YE NEI UE1 N/AE YE3 NE UE N/A[E YZ NE UE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Racks are bolted together.Y- ND-1 UE- N/All 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO- U-J N/AEL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported.
Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A             Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects
Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit connections are flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[- NEI Urn N/AEl YE NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y-   ND-1 UE- N/All Racks are bolted together.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI Urn-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO- U-J N/AEL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Scaffolding is properly supported and secured.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported. Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.
General housekeeping is good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 s t a t us: YE NFý U7I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-278-M7 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7)Location:
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y[- NEI Urn N/AEl Conduit connections are flexible.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Other Adverse Conditions
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YO NEI Urn-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Scaffolding is properly supported and secured.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
General housekeeping is good in this area.
YZ NEI U-] N/AU Y[ Nr-1 Ur] N/AU YEI NEI UW1 N/AZ YEr- NW- U-] N/AZ YZ NEI UF-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-13-2012
Equipment IDJ No. .1-PNL-278-M7 Equip. Class 3 18. Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
Y[ N- UE N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
s t a t us: YE NFý U7I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE' NO UE N/AE YZ NEI U-Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-278-M7                     Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Location: Bldg. CNTL               Floor El. 755             Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YZ NEI U-] N/AU
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               Y[ Nr-1 Ur] N/AU oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YEI NEI UW1 N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YEr- NW- U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of               YZ NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment IDJ No. .1-PNL-278-M7             Equip. Class3 18. Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7)
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[   N- UE N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[   NEI UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE' NO UE N/AE
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 71-01 7-19-2012 Status: Y[Z NM U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-TS-030-0192B-A Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/ITBBP Space Cooler A-A Temp Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             71-01 7-19-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
NOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Status: Y[Z NM U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. O-TS-030-0192B-A                 Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/ITBBP Space CoolerA-A Temp Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               NOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YEI NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No bent, broken, missing, or loose parts.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All surfaces are painted or stainless steel. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO] NE U[-] N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose parts.
YO] NE U[-] N/AZ YZ NEI UE1 N/AZ YN NEI UDJ N/AZ YE- NE Uil N/A2 YE] NEI U[]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI      UE1 N/AZ oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 0-TS-030-0192B-A Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/TBBP Space Cooler A-A Temp Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All surfaces are painted or stainless steel. No corrosionobserved.
Scaffolding in the area, but it is clear of proximity interaction and well restrained.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NEI UDJ N/AZ No cracks observed.
Y[ NEI UE- N/A[-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/A[-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE- NE Uil N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No masonry block walls present. All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YE] NEI U[]
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Conduit connection is flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UE- N/AUI YZ NEI U[-Other Adverse Conditions
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-TS-030-0192B-A             Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/TBBP Space Cooler A-A Temp Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y[  NEI UE- N/A[-
Scaffolding in the area, but it is clear of proximity interactionand well restrained.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/A[-
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present.All overhead items are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YO NEI UE- N/AUI Conduit connection is flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ NEI U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YEI NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Status: YZM' ND UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TS-O01-0017A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux Feedwater Pump Room Temp Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-1-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YZM' ND UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All painted and in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-O01-0017A-A                 Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump Room Temp Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692             Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Wall mounted.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All painted, no corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YE7 NE U[-E N/AE[YO- NE] U[:] N/A[YZ NEI UE1 N/AE YE- NEI UE- N/A]YZ NEI UE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE7 NE U[-E N/AE[
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-001-0017A-A Equip. ClaSS3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux Feedwater Pump Room Temp Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All painted and in good condition. Wall mounted.
All items and connections are rigidly mounted and have adequate clearance.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO- NE] U[:] N/A[
YO] NEI UD- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND] UD- N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
All items overhead are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All items are rigidly mounted.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NDI UD- N/AD-1 YE NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
All painted, no corrosionobserved.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NEI UE1 N/AE No cracks observed.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE- NEI UE- N/A]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-001-0017A-A           Equip. ClaSS3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump Room Temp Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO] NEI UD- N/AD-All items and connections are rigidly mounted and have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND] UD- N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All items overhead are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO NDI UD- N/AD-1 All items are rigidly mounted.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 SNtatus s YZN 1DU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-O179-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Temp Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-9-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
SNtatuss YZN     1DU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No.         1-TS-030-O179-B         Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Temp Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YE NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchored to concrete wall with finger clamp. All hardware is in good working condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UE- N/AE Anchored to concrete wall with finger clamp. All hardware is in good working condition.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NE: UE] N/AE oxidation?
No corrosion.
No corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks near anchorage.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YN NE] U-      N/AD1 No visible cracks near anchorage.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE[  NE] U[E] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NEI UE- N/AE YZ NE: UE] N/AE YN NE] U- N/AD1 YE[ NE] U[E] N/AZ YZ NEI UE1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0179-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump lB-B Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0179-B             Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump lB-B Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NEI U[] N/A[
No nearby equipment.
No nearby equipment.
YE NEI U[] N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur     N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overhead piping rigidly supported and in good working condition.
All overheadpiping rigidly supported and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Rigidly mounted to wall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NWI UE- N/AZ YE NF- UrZ Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NWI UE- N/AZ Rigidly mounted to wall.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NWI UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NF- UrZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NWI UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-23-2012 7-23-2012 s t a t usY- Ni UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. Charging Pump IA-A Room Cooler Temp Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-23-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
s t a t usY-     Ni   UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A                   Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. ChargingPump IA-A Room Cooler Temp Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 692           Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in place and in good condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
All items are painted and in good condition.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE NEI        U[L] N/AEl All anchorage is in place and in good condition.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YlM NEI UE- N/AE]
YE NZ YE NEI U[L] N/AEl YlM NEI UE- N/AE]YZ N[[] UD] N/AE1 YE- NEI U[] N/AZ YO NEI UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. Charging Puma IA-A Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
All items are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.
All items have adequate clearance.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ N[[] UD] N/AE1 No significant cracks observed.
Y1Z NEI UL- N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-1 N/AD'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE- NEI U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety chained. All other items overhead are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Every piece is rigidly mounted to the wall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y"I NEI U[:] N/AD YO ND-1 U[:]Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NEI UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A         Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. Charging Puma IA-A Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y1Z NEI  UL- N/AEl All items have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-1 N/AD' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety chained. All other items overhead are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y"I NEI U[:] N/AD Every piece is rigidly mounted to the wall.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YO ND-1 U[:]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE] NEI UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 St.t..: YE N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-9-2012
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
PENN Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St.t..: YE N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B                   Equip. Class3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 760           Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               PENN Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Finger strap in good condition and in place.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YZ NEI UE] N/A[
YE NE YZ NEI UE] N/A[YE NEI UE] N/AE-YO NEI UE N/AE YEI NE UE- N/As Y[ NEI UE-3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Finger strap in good condition and in place.
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG 1B-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE NEI UE] N/AE-oxidation?
Y- NEI Ur N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZD NI UrI N/A]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI UE N/AE
Mounted on a reinforced block wall.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All components are supported from the same wall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NO UZ N/AZ YE NZ UZ Other Adverse Conditions
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NE UE- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y[  NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B             Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG 1B-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y-   NEI Ur   N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZD NI UrI N/A]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Mounted on a reinforcedblock wall.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NO UZ N/AZ All components are supported from the same wall.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NZ UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-17-2012 7-17-2012 S t a t us: YZ ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pumo Room B High Temperature Switch Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-17-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
S t a t us: YZ ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A                 Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pumo Room B High Temperature Switch Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 676           Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rigidly mounted to unistrut bolted to concrete wall, no loose or missing hardware.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No rust or corrosion, painted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracking or deterioration.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE      NEI UE:] N/AE Rigidly mounted to unistrut bolted to concrete wall, no loose or missing hardware.
YE NEI UE:] N/AE YN NEI UEr N/AEl YE] NEI UE N/AE YE NE-- UE N/An YZ NO UE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN NEI UEr        N/AEl oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pump Room B High Temperature Switch Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No rust or corrosion, painted.
Cabinet/box mounted overhead is bolted to concrete wall.YE NE U[D N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE] NEI UE N/AE No visible cracking or deterioration.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NE-- UE N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A           Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pump Room B High Temperature Switch Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NE U[D N/ADI Cabinet/box mounted overheadis bolted to concrete wall.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.
Conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached line is flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NDI UD1 N/AD Y-- ND- U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NDI UD1 N/AD Attached line is flexible.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDI UD-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y-- ND- U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NDI UD-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Good housekeeping in area and clean.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 S t atus: Y[- :YNEUD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012 Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL Location:
Good housekeeping in area and clean.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St atus::YNEUD Y[-
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded to floor at the base.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Welds are painted.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012                   Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 755           Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
YD NE YZD ND UD N/AD Y-" ND] UD N/AD YD N[D] UD N/AN YD- NDI UD N/A--YN N[1 U-1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012 Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitorinq MCR PNL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YD NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
South face of east end was missing 2 bolts and south face of west end had I bolt missing and 1 bolt was sheared off. Condition needs to be further evaluated.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZD ND UD N/AD Welded to floor at the base.
YE7 NZ UD- N/AE1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[E] UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y-" ND] UD N/AD oxidation?
Suspended ceiling is supported adequately and overhead emergency lighting is tied off.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections to the cabinet are through the floor.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NEI UE- N/AEI YEI NE UE[Other Adverse Conditions
Welds are painted.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZJ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YD N[D] UD N/AN Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YD- NDI UD N/A--
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YN N[1 U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012             Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitorinq MCR PNL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE7 NZ UD- N/AE1 South face of east end was missing 2 bolts and south face of west end had I bolt missing and 1 bolt was shearedoff. Condition needs to be further evaluated.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[E] UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended ceiling is supportedadequately and overhead emergency lighting is tied off.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YEI NEI    UE- N/AEI Connections to the cabinet are through the floor.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YEI NE UE[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZJ NEI   UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-19-2012 7-19-2012 Status: YD NE U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO26A-A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-19-2012
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Status: YD NE U]
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
YE' NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded to floor at the base of the cabinet. All welds are in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO26A-A                 Equip. Class3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 755           Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YZ NE-] UE] N/AE YZ NEI UE N/AE YE] NEI UE N/A[YE- NE UE] N/AZ YZ NEl UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NE-] UE] N/AE Welded to floor at the base of the cabinet. All welds are in good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26A-A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UE N/AE oxidation?
The south face of the cabinet on the west end had 2 missing bolts. This could potentially be an adverse seismic condition as it could affect the cabinet functionality.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE] NEI UE N/A[
Condition needs to be further evaluated.
Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
YEI- NED UI- N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur- N/Al]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE- NE UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Suspended ceiling is supported adequately and overhead emergency lighting is tied-off 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections to the cabinet are through floor.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE: UE1 N/A[YE[ NZ UEI Other Adverse Conditions
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YZ NEl UE]
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN] NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26A-A           Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YEI- NED UI- N/A[]
The south face of the cabinet on the west end had 2 missing bolts. This could potentially be an adverse seismic condition as it could affect the cabinet functionality. Condition needs to be further evaluated.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur- N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended ceiling is supported adequatelyand overhead emergency lighting is tied-off
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NE: UE1 N/A[
Connections to the cabinet are through floor.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE[  NZ UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN] NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Some of the ceiling tile clips were missing 1 or 2 bolts.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Status: Y-- NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Location:
Some of the ceiling tile clips were missing 1 or 2 bolts.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-19-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: Y-- NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
Equipment ID No.. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B               Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL               Floor El. 755             Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Painted welds.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U       = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YE N[E UE[ N/AE YE NEI UE- N/AE YE[ NEI UE N/AO YE NEI UE[ N/AN YE NEI UEJ 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?               YE N[E UE[      N/AE Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YE NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
South face on west end of cabinet is missing 2 bolts. Further evaluation required.YE NO UE- N/AEI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE UE3 N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Painted welds.
Suspended ceiling is adequately supported and emergency lighting is tied-off 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections to cabinet are through floor.YO- NE-1 UE] N/AE-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YE[  NEI UE N/AO Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YE NEI UE[      N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE NEI UEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NO UE- N/AEI South face on west end of cabinet is missing 2 bolts. Furtherevaluation required.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE UE3 N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended ceiling is adequately supportedand emergency lighting is tied-off
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO- NE-1 UE] N/AE-Connections to cabinet are through floor.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NEI   UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Several of the ceiling clips were missing I or 2 bolts.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Location:
Several of the ceiling clips were missing I or 2 bolts.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-19-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded at base of cabinet, welds are in good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A                   Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 755           Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.YEI NED YED NE-1 U[-1 N/AE]YN- NEI UE] N/AE]Y[] NEI UE] N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YE-1 NEi UE] N/A[YE] NEI U[--3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YED NE-1 U[-1 N/AE]
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Welded at base of cabinet, welds are in good condition.
Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent panel/cabinet.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YN- NEI    UE] N/AE]
YEI N[-E U-- N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U11 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
oxidation?
Suspended ceiling is supported adequately and emergency lighting is tied-off.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections to cabinet through floor.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[9 NEI UE1 N/A[E YE NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEN NE-- UE-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y[] NEI   UE] N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE-1 NEi UE] N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE] NEI U[--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A             Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YEI N[-E U-- N/AE Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent panel/cabinet.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U11 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended ceiling is supportedadequately and emergency lighting is tied-off.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y[9 NEI UE1 N/A[E Connections to cabinet through floor.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI    UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YEN NE-- UE-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 7-19-2012 7-19-2012 S t.a t u: Y[Z ND-] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              7-19-2012
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
S t.atu: Y[Z ND-] UD--
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27B                   Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL                 Floor El. 755           Room, Area   C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Painted welds and free of rust.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Concrete was not observable due to carpet.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YEI--     NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y[D NE UL-1 N/AZ Y[O N[l U[- N/AEZ YE- N[ U[:1 N/AZ YE- NE-1 U- N/Af-Y- NEI UE1 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y[D NE UL-1 N/AZ Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO27B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               Y[O N[l U[-        N/AEZ oxidation?
Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent cabinet.YZ NE UE3 N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Painted welds and free of rust.
Suspended ceiling supported adequately and emergency lighting tied-off.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connections to cabinet through floor.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI ND UD N/AD YE NE U-Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       YE- N[        U[:1 N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YE- NE-1 U-        N/Af-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             Y-        NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO27B             Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NE UE3 N/AO Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent cabinet.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N-     U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended ceiling supported adequately and emergency lighting tied-off.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YEI ND UD N/AD Connections to cabinet through floor.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NE U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Status: Y[q NI- UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-24-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Status: Y[q NI- UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Mild surface corrosion near cracks/chips in paint. All hardware is painted and in fair condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y[E NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NE] U-] N/AO No loose, missing, or broken.
YO NE] U-] N/AO Y[D NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE] N/AE]YEI NE] UE] N/A[J YE N[: UE 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y[D NE] UE] N/AE]
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
oxidation?
All connecting hardware is rigidly supported.
Mild surface corrosion nearcracks/chips in paint. All hardware is painted and in fair condition.
Valves have adequate clearance.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NE] UE] N/AE]
YLN NEI UE] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No visible cracks in concrete.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEI NE] UE] N/A[J (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE N[: UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186         Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YLN NEI UE] N/AE]
All connecting hardware is rigidly supported. Valves have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI   UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.
Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines are rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NE- UE:] N/AE Attached lines are rigidly supported.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE- UE:] N/AE YE NEI UE[Z Other Adverse Conditions
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NEI UE[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 St.: YZ[7ND-1UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger A Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-25-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St.: YZ[7ND-1UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat ExchangerA Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737             Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
All surfaces are painted. No corrosion observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
YE N[ U-] N/AZNEI UEZ N/AZ YE NEI UE] N/AZ YE NEI UF] N/A[Z YE NEI UZ 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE N[    U-] N/AZ All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.
Only soft target is a drain pipe and valve. Adequately protected.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO* NEI UEZ N/AZ oxidation?
YlN NE UE N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] U[] N/A[E]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All surfaces are painted.No corrosion observed.
No masonry walls present. All overhead items are rigidly mounted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All piping connections are rigidly mounted.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEN N[:] UEI N/AE-YE NE1 U[7 Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI UE] N/AZ No cracks observed.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE-1 UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NEI UF] N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE NEI UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031               Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YlN NE UE N/AE Only soft target is a drain pipe and valve. Adequately protected.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YE NE] U[] N/A[E]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
No masonry walls present.All overhead items are rigidly mounted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YEN N[:] UEI N/AE-All piping connections are rigidly mounted.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YE NE1 U[7 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE NE-1 UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffolding is present in the area, but well restrained.
Scaffolding is present in the area, but well restrained.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is good in this area.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-1-2012 8-1-2012 S t a.u,.: YE] ND-- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Location:
Housekeeping is good in this area.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-1-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
St a.u,.: YE] ND-- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts. Appears that south east anchor bolts are missing lock nuts. Double nut configuration is not indicated on the drawing.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE] N7 U-] N/AD All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.Appears that south east anchor bolts are missing lock nuts. Double nut configuration is not indicatedon the drawing.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NEI    UD N/AD oxidation?
All hardware is painted. No visible corrosion.
All hardware is painted. No visible corrosion.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks observed >0.5mm 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YO ND-1 UD] N/AD No cracks observed >0.5mm
Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NDI    UD1 N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YE] N7 U-] N/AD YO NEI UD N/AD YO ND-1 UD] N/AD YE NDI UD1 N/AD1 YE NEI UD 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE NEI    UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No nearby equipment.
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Temporary scaffolding is present with adequate clearance and appears to be properly supported.
 
YZ NEI UD1 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr- UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032             Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Interaction Effects
Overhead, piping and conduit is rigidly supported.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NEI UD1 N/AD No nearby equipment. Temporary scaffolding is present with adequate clearance and appears to be properly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All piping connected is analyzed and rigidly mounted.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NDI UD1 N/AD YM N[D] U--Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr- UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND: UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Overhead,piping and conduit is rigidly supported.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NDI UD1 N/AD All piping connected is analyzed and rigidly mounted.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YM N[D] U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE ND: UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Good housekeeping, no observed adverse seismic conditions.
Good housekeeping, no observed adverse seismic conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Temperature sensor around HTX has the safety chain disconnected (not credible).
Temperature sensoraround HTX has the safety chain disconnected (not credible).
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 S tY[ NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger A Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv                                                 Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-1-2012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
S *a*.:
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
t      Y[   NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat ExchangerA Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 737           Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Mild surface corrosion near cracks/chips in paint. All hardware is painted and in fair condition.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete near anchorage.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Y[ NEI UE1 N/A[YO NE] UE- N/AEl YE NEI UE] N/AE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE] NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y[      NEI UE1 N/A[
No potential adverse seismic conditions noted for the anchorage.
No loose, missing, or broken.
YEr NEI U[E- N/Al]YZ NO UE--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NE] UE- N/AEl oxidation?
Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Mild surface corrosionnear cracks/chips in paint. All hardware is paintedand in fair condition.
All connecting hardware is rigidly supported.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI UE] N/AE No visible cracks in concrete nearanchorage.
Valves have adequate clearance.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YEr    NEI U[E- N/Al]
YlZ NEI U[] N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YZ NO UE--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No potentialadverse seismic conditions noted for the anchorage.
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185         Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YlZ NEI U[] N/AEl All connecting hardware is rigidly supported. Valves have adequate clearance.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.
Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines are rigidly supported 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE] NEI UW1 N/AW YE N[: UE-Other Adverse Conditions
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE] NEI UW1 N/AW Attached lines are rigidly supported
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[W]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE N[: UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI U[W]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Scaffolding near east end of heat exchanger
Scaffolding near east end of heat exchanger (-1" clearance). Scaffolding appears to be rigidly supported/restrainedby structuralsteel framing.
(-1" clearance).
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon7-521                                                         7-25-2012
Scaffolding appears to be rigidly supported/restrained by structural steel framing.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon7-521 7-25-2012 Status: YN N[-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-063-0046 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Location:
 
Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area Yard, WBN-WB-044 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Status: YN N[-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Equipment ID No.         1-TANK-063-0046           Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Location: Bldg. N/A                 Floor El. 729           Room, Area Yard, WBN-WB-044 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All items present and in good condition.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Tank is S. S. and in good condition.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YZ NEI UE- N/AEl All items present and in good condition.
Anchor bolts are painted with some minor corrosion present.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The well surrounding the tank had standing water. Direct inspection was not possible.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UE- N/AEl oxidation?
Looking through the water the concrete appeared to be in very good condition.
Tank is S. S. and in good condition. Anchor bolts are painted with some minor corrosion present.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YZ NE UE7 N/AE]
Verified per DWG 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The well surroundingthe tank had standing water. Direct inspection was not possible. Looking through the water the concrete appeared to be in very good condition.
YO NE YZ NEI UE- N/AEl YZ NEI UE- N/AEl YZ NE UE7 N/AE]YZ NEI UE N/A-YE NE UE]3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YZ NEI UE N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-063-0046 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Verified per DWG
Outdoor installation.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             YE NE UE]
All items on the tank perimeter were protected by a rain hood.YE NEI U-1 N/A-I 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-l ND UE N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Outside.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NE UE- N/AEl YE NF- UE-Other Adverse Conditions
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[N NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-063-0046             Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YE NEI U-1 N/A-I Outdoorinstallation. All items on the tank perimeter were protectedby a rain hood.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-l ND UE N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Outside.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YS NE UE- N/AEl
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YE NF- UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[N NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in this area is reasonable.
Housekeeping in this area is reasonable.
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon8-021 8-10-2012 S t~t~s: YZ NDIUD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Pressurizer Relief Tank Location:
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon8-021                                                         8-10-2012
Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
St ~t~s: YZ NDIUD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Pressurizer Relief Tank Location: Bldg. RB                   Floor El. 708           Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All surfaces painted and in good condition, minor chipping present.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage
Verified per DWG 48N949.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   Y0 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y0 NEI YE NEI U-- N/AD YEN NDI U[- N/AD Y- N[D UD N/ADl YE] NDI U N/AD3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YE NEI    U-- N/AD
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Pressurizer Relief Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YEN NDI    U[- N/AD oxidation?
No exposed soft targets. Tank is covered by structural steel platform.YZ NE] UF- N/AL]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U-- N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All surfaces painted and in good condition, minor chipping present.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[E NE] UL] N/AL]YN NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y-    N[D UD N/ADl
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NL] UL]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE] NDI U      N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Verified per DWG 48N949.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             Y[*ND1UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT             Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description PressurizerRelief Tank Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YZ NE] UF- N/AL]
No exposed soft targets. Tank is covered by structuralsteel platform.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U-- N/AL]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y[E NE] UL] N/AL]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YN NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NL] UL]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Substantial work in-progress during refueling outage. Temporary scaffolding and shielding in immediate area. No areas of concern.Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Status: YO N[D U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-O001 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Location:
Substantial work in-progressduring refueling outage. Temporary scaffolding and shielding in immediate area. No areas of concern.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             9-17-2012
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Status: YO N[D U[-]
YE] Nil 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No loose, missing, or broken.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Painted with minor chipping.
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-O001                   Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757             Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
No observed corrosion.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No observed structural cracking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e
Verified per DWGs ISI-0496-C-01 and N-1-2504.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YE] Nil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI UE- N/AEl YZ NEI UE- N/AE YE NEI UE- N/A[]YO NEI UE' N/AE[3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI UE- N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken.
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-0001 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI  UE- N/AE oxidation?
(2) soft targets, but well protected.
Painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE NEI UE- N/A[]
Overhead conduit rigidly supported.
No observed structuralcracking.
Lights have safety chain/wire.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NEI UE' N/AE[
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Piping rigidly mounted and tubing is flexible.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NEI U- N/A-YZ NEI U--1 N/A[:-Y[ NEI UW N/AO Y[ NR UW--Other Adverse Conditions
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Verified per DWGs ISI-0496-C-01 and N-1-2504.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-0001             Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YEI NEI    U-  N/A-(2) soft targets, but well protected.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U--1 N/A[:-
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead conduit rigidly supported. Lights have safety chain/wire.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y[  NEI  UW N/AO Piping rigidly mounted and tubing is flexible.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y[  NR UW--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NO U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No observed adverse conditions.
No observed adverse conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good. No temporary equipment.
Generalhousekeeping is good. No temporary equipment. Overheadscaffolding appears to be supported adequately (-30' above floor level).
Overhead scaffolding appears to be supported adequately
Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              8-2-2012
(-30' above floor level).Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Mike Gordon Date: 8-2-2012 8-2-2012 Appendix F: AWCs The following signatures are provided for the engineers responsible for the Area Walk-By Checklists in Watts Bar Unit 1.Name Signature Date Travis Hockenberry to I-/'3I/j2 Mike Gordon t. W I/ .Phillip York /0301/2?Page 345 of 451 Status: YE] NN U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
 
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-O01 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and fmdings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Appendix F: AWCs The following signatures are provided for the engineers responsible for the Area Walk-By Checklists in Watts Bar Unit 1.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Name                             Signature                         Date Travis Hockenberry                                                     I-/'3I/j2 to Mike Gordon                                                       t.W     I/ .
Shear lug on north-west air receiver is resting inside support saddle.YE] NE UD- N/AD-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NDI UD- N/AED degraded conditions?
Phillip York                                                       /0301/2?
See question 1.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All cable tray, duct, and conduit are rigidly supported.
Page 345 of 451
Cable trays are not over loaded.YO NDI UD- N/AD 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ ND UD- N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
 
All equipment rigidly supported.
Status: YE] NN U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Lights have cable to prevent them from falling.4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located Is .very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG             Floor El. 742                 Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-O01 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and fmdings.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Location:
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-001
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YE] NE UD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No spray hazard. C02 system implemented.
Shear lug on north-west air receiver is resting inside support saddle.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Observed lube oil pipe support clamp not properly seated. Not a significant seismic concern.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YE NDI     UD- N/AED degraded conditions?
Y- NEI UE1 N/AE YO NE UE1 N/AEl YE NEI UE- N/A[1 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NE Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Observed bent finger clamp on crosstie pipe to receivers.
See question 1.
Found loose pipe support hardware on start-up air line 1082-586-2-2-3.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             YO NDI UD- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Loose double nuts not carrying load.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
All cable tray, duct, and conduit are rigidly supported. Cable trays are not over loaded.
Room was very clean and good housekeeping is being practiced.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YZ ND UD- N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Observed missing bolts in 1-PNL-82-ANI "Diesel Engine Control Panel". Temporary eye wash station tied off using rope, not per TI-276.Observed missing anchor on pipe support near south end of room (tag not legible).
All equipment rigidly supported. Lights have cable to prevent them from falling.
Calculations for similar supports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration.
4 If the room   in which the SWEL item is located Is .very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area   selected should be described.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BA T-215-A-A 1-CHGR-215-A-A 1-COMP-082-0180 1-DIEG-082-A I 1-DIEG-082-A2 1-GEN-082-00IA-A 1- TANK-082-0 160-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Status: Y[-- N7 U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
This selected area should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet from   the SWEL item.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
 
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 742           Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-001
YN ND UD N/AD-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NE] UD- N/AD1 degraded conditions?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y-  NEI UE1 N/AE interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No spray hazard. C02 system implemented.
Good clearances on all items in the rooms. No concerns.Y[Z NDI UD] N/A[D YZ NEI UD N/AD 4 If the roo. in -hich the SWEL ite m is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the are. selected should be d ... ribed.This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NE    UE1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Location:
Observed lube oil pipe support clamp not properly seated. Not a significantseismic concern.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI UE- N/A[1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI Ur- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flood potential in the room. No sprinklers present.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UD1 N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustible products and no ignition source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nr- Ur1 N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO* NE Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Observed bent finger clamp on crosstie pipe to receivers. Found loose pipe support hardware on start-up air line 1082-586-2-2-3. Loose double nuts not carrying load.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Room was very clean and good housekeeping is being practiced. Observed missing bolts in 1-PNL-82-ANI "DieselEngine Control Panel". Temporary eye wash station tied off using rope, not per TI-276.
Observed missing anchor on pipe support nearsouth end of room (tag not legible). Calculationsfor similarsupports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-BA T-215-A-A 1-CHGR-215-A-A 1-COMP-082-0180 1-DIEG-082-A I 1-DIEG-082-A2 1-GEN-082-00IA-A 1- TANK-082-0 160-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-17-2012
 
Status: Y[--   N7 U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                 Floor El. 760                 Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                   YN ND UD N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YN NE] UD- N/AD1 degraded conditions?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               Y[Z NDI UD] N/A[D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YZ NEI UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Good clearances on all items in the rooms. No concerns.
4 If the roo. in -hich the SWEL     ite m is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the are. selected should be d ... ribed.
This selected   area should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
 
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 760           Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI Ur- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No flood potential in the room. No sprinklers present.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI UD1 N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustible products and no ignition source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ Nr-   Ur1 N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No housekeeping issues or temporary equipment.
No housekeeping issues or temporary equipment.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI UD:]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YEI NEI UD:]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Everything is rigidly supported.
Everything is rigidly supported.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FAN-030-0449-B 1-TS-030-0453A-B Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Status: YZ N-- U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
1-FAN-030-0449-B 1-TS-030-0453A-B Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV                                               Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           7-17-2012
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
YZ NEI UD] N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y- NEI UD- N/AD degraded conditions?
Status: YZ N-- U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
No corrosion or rust. All welded anchorage painted with no signs of damage.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported and does not appear to be overloaded.
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 757                 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YZ NEI          UD] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       Y-     NEI UD- N/AD degraded conditions?
No corrosion or rust. All welded anchoragepainted with no signs of damage.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             YE    NDI UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YZ NDI UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All overhead items rigidly supported with adequate clearance.
All overhead items rigidly supported with adequate clearance.
YE NDI UD N/AD YZ NDI UD N/AD 4 If the room 1,. hich the SWEL itemt is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaIl). the are. selected should be described.
4 If the room   1,. hich the SWEL   itemt is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaIl). the are. selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL it. t.
This selected   area should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   it. t.
Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO ND] UD1 N/A-l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No fuel source or combustibles.
All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y-- ND3 UDI N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame.Temporary scaffolding secured properly.
No fuel source or combustibles.
Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).YO ND] UD1 N/A-l Y-- ND3 UDI N/AD-Y-- NDI UD- N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YlN NDI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y-- NDI UD- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495).The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-AOOI-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Location:
Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003
Temporary scaffolding secured properly. Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YlN NDI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No fuel source or combustibles.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495).
Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame.Temporary scaffolding secured properly.
The following equipment is included in the areaencompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).YID NEI UI- N/AlU YS N[l UED N/AEl YZ NEI UE- N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UF-l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
1-BD-212-AOOI-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-18-2012
Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495).The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-AOO1-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 351 of 451 Status: Y[E NEI UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YID NEI UI- N/AlU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
YS NEI UiZ N/A-1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NEI UL-1 N/AZ]degraded conditions?
All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.
Minor/mild surface rust on pump room cooler, but not significant.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS N[l UED N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable/conduit rigidly supported.
No fuel source or combustibles.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UE- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
All equipment appears to have adequate clearance and supported appropriately to minimize interaction.
Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame.
YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-YO NEI Ur] N/AEl, 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hail). the ..e.. elected should be described.
Temporary scaffolding secured properly. Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).
This selected area should be based on judgment.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YZ NEI UF-l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?
e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Ite.Page 352 of 451 Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004
Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495).
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler heads in the room.YZ NE] UF] N/AZI 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No fuel source or combustibles in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
No portable/temporary equipment or installations.
1-BD-212-AOO1-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-18-2012 Page 351 of 451
YN NEI UE] N/Ar-YS NEI UE- N/AEZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
 
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-074-0021-B 1-PMCL-030-0 176-B 1-PMP-074-0020-B 1-TS-030-5237A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 353 of 451 Status: YE NE-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Status: Y[E NEI UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 676                 Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All visible anchorage is clean and painted.YZ NE[[ UE[ N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/A[degraded conditions?
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
No corrosion visible. All surfaces are clean and painted.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                           YS NEI UiZ N/A-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?No cable/conduit raceways or HVAC duct were present or visible.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                               Y[   NEI UL-1 N/AZ]
degraded conditions?
Minor/mild surface rust on pump room cooler,but not significant.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                       YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable/conduit rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                             YO NEI        Ur] N/AEl, interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All equipment appears to have adequate clearance and supported appropriatelyto minimize interaction.
4 If the room   in which   the SWEL   item   is located is very large   (e.g., Turbine Hail). the .. e.. elected should   be described.
This selected   area   should be based   on judgment. e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet   from     the SWEL Ite.
Page 352 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 676           Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NE] UF] N/AZI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No sprinklerheads in the room.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI UE] N/Ar-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No fuel source or combustibles in the area.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI UE- N/AEZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No portable/temporaryequipment or installations.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NEI UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-FCV-074-0021-B 1-PMCL-030-0176-B 1-PMP-074-0020-B 1-TS-030-5237A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-18-2012 Page 353 of 451
 
Status: YE NE-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. CNTL                     Floor El. 755             Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YZ NE[[ UE[      N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All visible anchorageis clean and painted.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                     YE NE] UE] N/A[
degraded conditions?
No corrosion visible. All surfaces are clean and painted.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit.                           YEI NEI UE] N/AN raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
No cable/conduit raceways or HVAC duct were present or visible.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YN NEl U[-E N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All cabinets, book shelves, lights, and smoke detectors are anchored or cable restrained.
All cabinets, book shelves, lights, and smoke detectors are anchored or cable restrained.
YEI NEI UE] N/AN YN NEl U[-E N/AE 4 If the coo. In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the coo. In which the SWEL   item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on juda ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 354 of 451 Location:
This selected     area   should be based on juda   ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005
Page 354 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No water sources were present.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Combustible items were present (carpet, paper, cardboard) but all electrical connections were contained in industrial grade cabinets that would contain sparks or flash.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
No portable equipment was present. Some notebooks were in shelves with no restraints but were not a significant risk.YEI NEI UEr N/AN YZ NEI UEr N/AE YO NEI UE- N/AE 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Location: Bldg. CNTL           Floor El. 755           Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005
Some missing bolts were observed in the restraint plates holding the ceiling tiles. In all but one case it was I out of 4 bolts missing. In one plate there were 2 bolts out of 4 missing. Maintenance was called to correct the problem immediately.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YEI NEI UEr      N/AN interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Returned to the area at a later date and confirmed the issue was resolved.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-DBD-238-0003 O-PNL-278-MO12 O-PNL-278-MO26A-A O-PNL-278-MO26D-B O-PNL-278-MO27A O-PNL-278-MO27B 1-BD-278-MOO7B 1-PNL-278-M7 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Page 355 of 451 Status: YN N[-- Uf-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
No water sources were present.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YZ NEI UEr      N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Combustible items were present (carpet,paper,cardboard)but all electricalconnections were contained in industrialgrade cabinets that would contain sparks or flash.
Room cooler anchorage in good working condition with no loose or missing parts.YZ N[l U[] N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UFI N/AZ degraded conditions?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YO NEI UE- N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No corrosion or cracking visible.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Overhead conduit adequately supported.
No portable equipment was present. Some notebooks were in shelves with no restraintsbut were not a significantrisk.
YZ NEI U[-Z N/AZ 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YO NEI     UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Adequate clearance around all equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
YZ NEI UZ] N/AZ 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
Some missing bolts were observed in the restraintplates holding the ceiling tiles. In all but one case it was I out of 4 bolts missing. In one plate there were 2 bolts out of 4 missing. Maintenance was called to correct the problem immediately. Returned to the area at a laterdate and confirmed the issue was resolved.
This selected area should be based onjudgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 356 of 451 Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006
O-DBD-238-0003 O-PNL-278-MO12 O-PNL-278-MO26A-A O-PNL-278-MO26D-B O-PNL-278-MO27A O-PNL-278-MO27B 1-BD-278-MOO7B 1-PNL-278-M7 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-19-2012 Page 355 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and piping is properly supported.
 
YO NEI UO N/A[6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Lube oil piping is adequately supported and in good working condition.
Status: YN N[--         Uf-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX                         Floor El. 692                 Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                             YZ N[l U[] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Room cooler anchorage in good working condition with no loose or missing parts.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                                 YZ NE] UFI N/AZ degraded conditions?
No corrosion or cracking visible.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                         YZ NEI U[-Z N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Overhead conduit adequately supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                               YZ NEI UZ] N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance aroundall equipment.
4 If the   room   In which the SWEL     item     is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall),     the area   selected should be described.
This selected     area   should be based     onjudgment,     e.g., on the order   of about 35   feet   from the   SWEL   item.
Page 356 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 692           Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NEI UO N/A[
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
All sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and piping is properly supported.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI    U-- N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Lube oil piping is adequately supported and in good working condition.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI UZ- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Scaffolding is present and adequately supported/restrained.
Scaffolding is present and adequately supported/restrained.
YN NEI U-- N/AZl YN NEI UZ- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-062-0089 1-PMP-062-0108-A 1-TS-030-0183-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 357 of 451 Status: Y[ NE] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note- Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
1-FCV-062-0089 1-PMP-062-0108-A 1-TS-030-0183-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-23-2012 Page 357 of 451
All anchorage appears to be correct and complete.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
 
No degraded conditions were observed.
Status: Y[       NE] U[-
Good housekeeping was being conducted.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 692               Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Most pipe, duct, cable tray and equipment is rigidly supported.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No significant spatial interactions are expected.YE N[] UI- N/AZ YO NEI U[] N/A[-]YO N[W UW- N/AZ YE NEI U[] N/A[]4 If the room In wh ch the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., TurbIne Hall), the area selected should be described.
Note- Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
This selected area should be based on judgment.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YE N[] UI- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 358 of 451 Location:
All anchorageappears to be correct and complete.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                           YO NEI        U[] N/A[-]
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?The fire protection piping is rod hung, but the sprinklers all have adequate clearance.
degraded conditions?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Lube oil was present, but the piping was designedwith adequate flexibility and support. It is also a welded system.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No degraded conditions were observed. Good housekeeping was being conducted.
Good housekeeping is performed.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YO N[W UW- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
No temporary equipment was observed.YO NDI UD- N/AD1 YN NDI UD- N/AD-1 YN NDI UDI N/ADl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND-] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YE NEI U[] N/A[]
The area was clean and painted. Most all items in the room were rigidly mounted.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-063-0048-B 1-FCV-063-0175-B 1-PMP-063-0015-B 1-TS-030-0179-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 359 of 451 Status: YN NE! U[Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area 4 A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Most pipe, duct, cable tray and equipment is rigidly supported. No significant spatialinteractionsare expected.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
4 If the room In    wh ch the SWEL    item    is located is very large (e.g., TurbIne  Hall),  the area selected should  be described.
No loose, bent, or broken hardware.YE NEI U1 N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NO- U- N/AZ degraded conditions?
This  selected   area should be based     on judgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from the SWEL   item.
All equipment anchorage painted and in good condition.
Page 358 of 451
No visible cracking in concrete.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All HVAC, conduit, and cable tray rigidly supported.
 
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Location: Bldg. AUX               Floor El. 692         Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007
Adequate clearances between piping systems and support steel and equipment.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NDI    UD- N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Y0 NEI U- N/AZ YN NEI U- N/AZ 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the .re.. elected should be described.
The fire protectionpiping is rod hung, but the sprinklers all have adequate clearance.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 360 of 451 Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NDI UD- N/AD-1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area 4 AI-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008
Lube oil was present, but the piping was designedwith adequate flexibility and support. It is also a welded system.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and are properly supported.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NDI UDI N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Good housekeeping is performed. No temporary equipment was observed.
Temporary lifting device restrained with rope near instrument rack (0-L-155). Adequately restrained, but not per TI-276. Lifting device should be removed.YE NEI Ur- N/AEi YED NEI U"I N/ALl YO NErI U1 N/AZl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Nr-- Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ ND-] U--
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-L-155 O-PMP-070-0051-S 1-PMP-003-0128-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 361 of 451 Status: YE N-- U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The area was clean and painted. Most all items in the room were rigidly mounted.
No loose, missing, or broken.YE NEI UE1 N/AZl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI Uil N/AZl degraded conditions?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Paint chipped away with mild surface rust.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable/conduit properly supported with flexible connections on/off of tray.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
1-FCV-063-0048-B 1-FCV-063-0175-B 1-PMP-063-0015-B 1-TS-030-0179-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-23-2012 Page 359 of 451
 
Status: YN NE! U[
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                             Floor El. 713               Room, Area 4 A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                             YE NEI U1 N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No loose, bent, or broken hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                                   YN NO- U-         N/AZ degraded conditions?
All equipment anchoragepainted and in good condition. No visible cracking in concrete.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                         Y0 NEI U-        N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
All HVAC, conduit, and cable tray rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                               YN NEI U-        N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearancesbetween piping systems and support steel and equipment.
4 If the     room   In which     the SWEL   item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   Hall), the .re.. elected should be described.
This   selected     area   should     be based on judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from   the SWEL   item.
Page 360 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 713           Room, Area 4 AI-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YE NEI Ur- N/AEi interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and are properly supported.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YED NEI U"I N/ALl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO NErI U1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary lifting device restrained with rope near instrument rack (0-L-155). Adequately restrained,but not per TI-276. Lifting device should be removed.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN Nr-- Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
0-L-155 O-PMP-070-0051-S 1-PMP-003-0128-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-23-2012 Page 361 of 451
 
Status: YE N-- U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. IPS                 Floor El. 741               Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                             YE NEI UE1 N/AZl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No loose, missing, or broken.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                 YE NEI Uil N/AZl degraded conditions?
Paint chipped away with mild surface rust.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                         YN NWI UZ' N/AZ1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable/conduitproperly supported with flexible connections on/off of tray.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial               YZ NEI UE] N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance around all equipment.
Adequate clearance around all equipment.
YN NWI UZ' N/AZ1 YZ NEI UE] N/AZl 4 If the room In which the SWEL ite rm is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room In which the SWEL   ite rm is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on judg ment. e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 362 of 451 Location:
This selected area should be based   on judg   ment. e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009
Page 362 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Water pipe resting against motor enclosure; credible but not significant spatial interaction.
 
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Container with combustible material in area and restrained with chain.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. IPS             Floor El. 741           Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009
Two trash cans in area, credible but not significant and one ladder not restrained resting on the floor. One trash can in front of the fire extinguisher.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NE U-1 N/A[]
YS NE U-1 N/A[]YE N[] UI- N/AE]YID NEI U-- N/AL3 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N:] UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Housekeeping is reasonable, area is dirty and wet (as expected).
Water pipe resting againstmotor enclosure; credible but not significant spatialinteraction.
Temporary rolling scaffolding with wheel stops engaged, but tied-off in 2 spots with rope, not per TI-276.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-PMP-067-0047-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 363 of 451 Status: YE] No U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE N[] UI- N/AE]
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Containerwith combustible materialin area and restrainedwith chain.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YID NEI U-- N/AL3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Two trash cans in area, credible but not significant and one laddernot restrainedresting on the floor. One trash can in front of the fire extinguisher.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ N:] UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is reasonable, area is dirty and wet (asexpected). Temporary rolling scaffolding with wheel stops engaged, but tied-off in 2 spots with rope, not per TI-276.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-PMP-067-0047-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-24-2012 Page 363 of 451
 
Status: YE] No U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. IPS                       Floor El. 741             Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YO NI] UI] N/AL potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No, loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
No, loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
YO NI] UI] N/AL 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UI- N/AL degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YZ NEI UI- N/AL degraded conditions?
Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.
Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               YO NI            U-l N/AL-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Temporary scaffolding near O-PMP-67-32 not adequately restrained to prevent seismic interaction with pump motor.YO NI U-l N/AL-YI] NO UL N/All 4 Ir the roo. in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the are. ..e..ted should be d .... ibed.This selected area. should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 364 of 451 Location:
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supportedand in good working condition.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YI] NO UL N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping adequately supported, no sprinkler heads in the area.YS NEI UEZ N/AZl 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Oil container not restrained properly to prevent tipping (near O-PMP-67-36).YE NEI UI- N/AZl 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding near O-PMP-67-32 not adequately restrainedto prevent seismic interactionwith pump motor.
Temporary cabinet not restrained to prevent tipping. Rain hood not properly restrained.
4 Ir the   roo. in which the SWEL   item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall),   the are. e..ted
YM NEI UE- N/AZl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                                                                                                          ..       should   be d .... ibed.
Observed light fixture (PS504A) with safety cover not restrained with safety tie-off Credible but not significant.
This selected     area. should be based on Judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from the   SWEL   item.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-PMP-067-0028-A O-PMP-067-0036-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 365 of 451 Status: Y[ No U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Page 364 of 451
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area 4 /110, WBN-WB-01 1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
 
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Location: Bldg. IPS             Floor El. 741           Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010
All area equipment is in good working order with mild surface corrosion.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI UEZ N/AZl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
YO NEI ULI N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U[-] N/AZ degraded conditions?
All piping adequately supported, no sprinklerheads in the area.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI      UI- N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Oil containernot restrainedproperly to prevent tipping (nearO-PMP       36).
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YM NEI UE- N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary cabinet not restrainedto prevent tipping. Rain hood not properlyrestrained.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Observed light fixture (PS504A) with safety cover not restrainedwith safety tie-off Credible but not significant.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-PMP-067-0028-A O-PMP-067-0036-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-24-2012 Page 365 of 451
 
Status: Y[     No U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. IPS                     Floor El. 722                 Room, Area 4 /110, WBN-WB-01 1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YO NEI ULI N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All area equipment is in good working orderwith mild surface corrosion.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                           YZ NE] U[-] N/AZ degraded conditions?
Mild surface corrosion.
Mild surface corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and it is rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YED N[-] UZ N/AZ-]
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Monorails on temporary scaffolding appear to be only friction held. They could fall off and strike the equipment below.YED N[-] UZ N/AZ-]Y[ NW-1 UWl N/AZ 4 It the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
All conduit and it is rigidly supported.
This selected ares should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item.Page 366 of 451 Location:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                         Y[    NW-1 UWl N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area 4 II10, WBN-WB-011
Monorails on temporaryscaffolding appearto be only friction held. They could fall off and strike the equipment below.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler heads in the area. All pipe is properly supported.
4 It the room in   which the SWEL   item   Is located Is very large   (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area   selected   should be described.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Overhead lube oil line, but it is adequately supported.
This selected   ares should be based     on Judgment,   e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet from   the   SWEL     Item.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Page 366 of 451
Lube oil bottle on electrical panel. Scaffolding and barricade storage area-pieces not restrained.
 
Barrels not restrained in area of SSEL Instrument Rack. Credible but not significant.
Location: Bldg. IPS             Floor El. 722           Room, Area 4 II10, WBN-WB-011
YED Nil U[I: N/AZ-Y[D NEI UE N/AZ-YE NEI UE- N/A-1 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[r]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Smoke detector missing safety cable-not connected.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YED Nil U[I: N/AZ-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Could fall on an instrument rack.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No sprinklerheads in the area. All pipe is properly supported.
General housekeeping issues. Light bulb burnt out in the South end of the room.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Are Walk-By: 0-L-147/C 1-S TN-067-0009-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 367 of 451 Status: YE N-- U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     Y[D NEI  UE N/AZ-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4/107, WBN-WB-012 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Overhead lube oil line, but it is adequately supported.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YE NEI UE- N/A-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No missing parts observed.YN NEI U-] N/AZ1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?
Lube oil bottle on electricalpanel. Scaffolding and barricadestorage area-piecesnot restrained.Barrels not restrainedin area of SSEL Instrument Rack. Credible but not significant.
Some chipped and missing paint, minor surface corrosion, but acceptable.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI U[r]
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduit only and it is rigidly supported.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Smoke detector missing safety cable-not connected. Could fall on an instrument rack.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping issues. Light bulb burnt out in the South end of the room.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Are Walk-By:
0-L-147/C 1-S TN-067-0009-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-24-2012 Page 367 of 451
 
Status: YE N--         U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. IPS                           Floor El. 741               Room, Area 4 /107, WBN-WB-012 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YN NEI U-] N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No missing parts observed.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YO NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?
Some chipped and missing paint, minor surface corrosion,but acceptable.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                   YZ NZI UZ- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Conduit only and it is rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                         YN NEI UEZ N/AZ--
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All items have plenty of clearance.
All items have plenty of clearance.
YZ NZI UZ- N/AZ YN NEI UEZ N/AZ--4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room In     which     the SWEL   item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 368 of 451 Location:
This selected   area   should     be based   on judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1107, WBN-WB-012
Page 368 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping is rigidly mounted. No sprinkler heads present.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No lube oil lines present.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
Temporary security equipment is not adequately secured. Heat trace connections are not restrained on all screen wash pumps.YN NEI Ur] N/AL]YZ NEI Ur] N/A-]YI NEI Ur] N/Ar]8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZ Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-Safety lights not properly positioned or directed-Hand hole cover in HPFP Sump A sump cover is not on or bolted-Bolts missing in HPFP Sump B sump cover The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-PMP-067-0431 1-PMP-067-0440 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 369 of 451 Status: Y[ Nn- U[Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Location: Bldg. IPS             Floor El. 741           Room, Area 4 1107, WBN-WB-012
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A2-Q 1A 13-U, WBN-WB-013 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI Ur] N/AL]
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI ULI N/AEI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
All piping is rigidly mounted. No sprinkler heads present.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI Ur] N/A-]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No lube oil lines present.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YI  NEI Ur] N/Ar]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary security equipment is not adequately secured. Heat trace connections are not restrainedon all screen wash pumps.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NZ Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
      -Safety lights not properly positioned or directed
      -Hand hole cover in HPFPSump A sump cover is not on or bolted
      -Bolts missing in HPFP Sump B sump cover The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-PMP-067-0431 1-PMP-067-0440 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-24-2012 Page 369 of 451
 
Status: Y[       Nn- U[
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                               Floor El. 737                 Room, Area 4 A2-Q 1A 13-U, WBN-WB-013 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                           YO NEI ULI N/AEI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The equipment in the area appears to be free of loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
The equipment in the area appears to be free of loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant YO NEi Ufl N/AE]degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant YO NEi                                       Ufl N/AE]
No significant degradation.
degraded conditions?
Only minor surface corrosion as noted in heat exchanger and chiller walk-downs.
No significant degradation.Only minor surface corrosion as noted in heat exchanger and chillerwalk-downs.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI ULi N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appear to be overloaded.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YO NEI ULi N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded.
HVAC ducting is rigidly supported and in good working condition.
HVAC ducting is rigidly supported and in good working condition.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                             YN NEI ULi N/AE' interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No significant spatial interaction with equipment.
No significant spatialinteractionwith equipment.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Hoist not parked in proper zone due to scaffolding.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic                                   YN NEI U[-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
In close proximity to fire protection pipe strut. Could potentially damage strut and/or pipe.Deemed credible but not significant.
Hoist not parked in properzone due to scaffolding. In close proximity to fire protection pipe strut. Could potentially damage strut and/orpipe.
YN NEI ULi N/AE'YN NEI U[-1 N/AEl 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
Deemed credible but not significant.
This selected ares. hould be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL i.tm.Page 370 of 451 Location:
4 If the room   in which       the SWEL     item   Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should   be described.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A2-Q/A 13-U, WBN-WB-013
This selected     ares. hould     be based     on Judg   ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL i.tm.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles in area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Page 370 of 451
Ladder, fall hardness and mop bucket stored behind XFMR Coil. Bottle cart not tied-off YED NEI UE- N/AE)YZ NEI U['] N/AE-8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?See general comments.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
 
* Loose rods under temporary storage box, should be restrained or stored somewhere else.* Radcon cabinet not visually bolted or restrained, but appears to be permanently restrained (did not move when pushed).* Loose table with instrument on it. (Not in proximity of anything that would be damaged if it fell).* Scaffolding resting on pipe to support ladder (not properly supported).
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 737           Room, Area 4 A2-Q/A 13-U, WBN-WB-013
* Ladder tied off but resting on conduit near A2-R.* Stored unistrut and tools near A2-Q.* Cable tray covers on floor near A6-R (appears to be work-in-progress, but no work-in-progress tag).* Ladder tied-off with rope to conduit. A 12-S.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0036/2-A O-CHR-031-0080-A 0-HTX-070-0186 1-HTX-070-0185 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 371 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YED NEI UE- N/AE) interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
No combustibles in area.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YZ NEI U['] N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Ladder, fall hardness and mop bucket stored behind XFMR Coil. Bottle cart not tied-off
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
See general comments.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
* Loose rods under temporary storage box, should be restrainedor stored somewhere else.
* Radcon cabinet not visually bolted or restrained,but appears to be permanently restrained(did not move when pushed).
* Loose table with instrument on it. (Not in proximity of anything that would be damaged if it fell).
* Scaffolding resting on pipe to support ladder (notproperly supported).
* Laddertied off but resting on conduit near A2-R.
* Stored unistrut and tools nearA2-Q.
* Cable tray covers on floor near A6-R (appearsto be work-in-progress,but no work-in-progress tag).
* Ladder tied-off with rope to conduit. A12-S.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-CHR-031-0036/2-A O-CHR-031-0080-A 0-HTX-070-0186 1-HTX-070-0185 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-25-2012 Page 371 of 451
 
Status: Y[       NEI U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                   Floor El. 772                 Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YO N[          U-] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorage free of loose, missing and damaged hardware (like new condition).
All anchorage free of loose, missing and damaged hardware (like new condition).
YO N[ U-] N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YED NE] U- N/AL]degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YED NE] U-         N/AL]
No signs of corrosion or cracking in concrete.
degraded conditions?
All surfaces painted or galvanized.
No signs of corrosion or cracking in concrete. All surfaces painted or galvanized.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC, cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               YN NEI U-- N/AZ:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC, cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance around all equipment.
Adequate clearance around all equipment.
YN NEI U-- N/AZ: YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ1 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room   In which the SWEL item   is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   Hall), the area selected should   be described.
This selected erea should be base .. on judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL it em.Page 372 of 451 Location:
This selected erea should be base
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014
                                .. on judgment,     e.g.. on the order   of about 35 feet   from the SWEL   it em.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire protection piping is rigidly supported and sprinkler heads have adequate clearance.
Page 372 of 451
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles observed in area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014
Housekeeping clean and orderly.YED NEI U[] N/AL]YN NEI U-] N/AE1 YN NEI UE-] N/AE 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?No observed adverse seismic conditions Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YED NEI U[] N/AL]
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHGR-236-0001-D O-INV-235-OOO1-D O-XSW-236-68DC2-S 1-INV-235-0001-D 1-INV-235-0002-E 1-MCC-232-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 373 of 451 Status: Y[ NE] U[--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.'
Fire protection piping is rigidly supported and sprinkler heads have adequateclearance.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI U-] N/AE1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No combustibles observed in area.
All visible anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI UE-] N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
YZ NEI UEZ N/AE]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE N[-] UE] N/A[]degraded conditions?
Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.Housekeeping clean and orderly.
No visible signs of rust/corrosion or damage.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI Ur]
Conduit and piping is rigidly supported as well.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
No observed spatial interactions.
No observed adverse seismic conditions Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
YN NE] UE] N/AE]YN NE] UE] N/AEr 4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is ..ry large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area s. lected'should be described.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 374 of 451 Location:
O-CHGR-236-0001-D O-INV-235-OOO1-D O-XSW-236-68DC2-S 1-INV-235-0001-D 1-INV-235-0002-E 1-MCC-232-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-25-2012 Page 373 of 451
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015
 
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads in area, but have adequate clearance.
Status: Y[       NE] U[--
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Appendix R work in progress and tagged/staged appropriately.
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 757                 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.'
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YZ NEI UEZ N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All visible anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YE N[-] UE] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
No visible signs of rust/corrosionor damage.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YN NE] UE] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded. Conduit and piping is rigidly supported as well.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YN NE] UE] N/AEr interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No observed spatialinteractions.
4 Ifthe   room in   which the SWEL     item is   located is .. ry large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area s. lected'should be described.
This selected     area   should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from the SWEL item.
Page 374 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI UE- N/AE!
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinkler heads in area, but have adequate clearance.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NO! UE- N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustibles observed.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI U[] N/AE!
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Appendix R work in progress and tagged/stagedappropriately.
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be adequately restrained.
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be adequately restrained.
YZ NEI UE- N/AE!YN NO! UE- N/AE-YZ NEI U[] N/AE!8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI U[--
Good housekeeping observed.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Everything in area is rigidly mounted.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-21 1-A-A 1-BD-212-AO02-A 2-BD-21 1-A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 375 of 451 Status: Y[ No U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Good housekeeping observed. Everything in area is rigidly mounted.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
All visible anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
1-BD-21 1-A-A 1-BD-212-AO02-A 2-BD-21 1-A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           7-26-2012 Page 375 of 451
YE NEI UI- N/AE-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UI] N/AEl degraded conditions?
 
All visible anchorage is painted and free of corrosion.
Status: Y[     No U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
No observed concrete cracking or damage.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
Location: Bldg. AUX               Floor El. 757             Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Temporary scaffolding within a X" of top of XFMR (WBN-1-DXF-237-A), potential for seismic spatial interaction.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                         YE NEI UI- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Upon return for walk-down of transformer the scaffolding pole in question was moved to provided proper clearance.
All visible anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
YED NEIl UI- N/AE]YZ NEIl UI] N/AE1 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant             YE NEI UI] N/AEl degraded conditions?
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item.Page 376 of 451 LocatiOn:
All visible anchorageis painted and free of corrosion.No observed concrete cracking or damage.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                   YED NEIl UI- N/AE]
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads present,, but appear to have adequate clearance.
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U['- N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No .combustibles observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI UE1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
Good housekeeping practice.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial           YZ NEIl UI] N/AE1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. Temporary scaffolding within a X" of top of XFMR (WBN-1-DXF-237-A), potential for seismic spatial interaction. Upon return for walk-down of transformerthe scaffolding pole in question was moved to provided properclearance.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BD-236-0001/1-D O-DPL-236-O0O1-D 1-BD-235-0001-D I-DXF-237-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 377 of 451 Status: YN NO UF--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about   35 feet from the SWEL Item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Page 376 of 451
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
LocatiOn: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinkler heads present,,but appearto have adequate clearance.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YE NEI U['- N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No .combustiblesobserved.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YED NEI UE1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Good housekeeping practice. Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-BD-236-0001/1-D O-DPL-236-O0O1-D 1-BD-235-0001-D I-DXF-237-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           7-26-2012 Page 377 of 451
 
Status: YN NO UF--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 772                 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YN NEI U[] N/A[Z]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Good Housekeeping-everything is painted and clean. All objects are well restrained.
Good Housekeeping-everything is painted and clean. All objects are well restrained.
YN NEI U[] N/A[Z]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?
All welds and bolts are clean and painted.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All cable tray and ducts are rigidly mounted on robust steel.YN NEI UZ N/AZ[4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All welds and bolts are clean and painted.
All items appear to have more than adequate clearance.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YN NEI UZ N/AZ[
YZ NEI U[-Z N/AZ3 4 If the .roo In which the SWEL ite -i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected shou ld be described.
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 378 of 451 Location:
All cable tray and ducts are rigidly mounted on robust steel.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YZ NEI      U[-Z N/AZ3 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All items in the area are rigidly mounted. Sprinklers in the area are rigidly supported.
All items appearto have more than adequate clearance.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustible material Older cabling is coated with Fire retardant.
4 If the .roo   In which the SWEL     ite - i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected shou ld be described.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
This selected     area   should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 378 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI Ur-- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
All items in the area are rigidly mounted. Sprinklers in the area are rigidly supported.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI  U'  N/AZI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustible material Older cabling is coated with Fire retardant.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI  UE- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Some temporary scaffolding is present, but well installed.
Some temporary scaffolding is present, but well installed.
YN NEI Ur-- N/AZ YE NEI U' N/AZI YZ NEI UE- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?
General housekeeping is good. Several light fixtures need bulbs in the area.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHGR-236-0003-F O-XSW-236-79DC 1-S 1-INV-235-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 379 of 451 Status: YZ NE[] UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
General housekeeping is good. Several light fixtures need bulbs in the area.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
All anchorage is in good condition.
O-CHGR-236-0003-F O-XSW-236- 79DC 1-S 1-INV-235-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           7-26-2012 Page 379 of 451
No loose, missing, or broken.YZ NEI UE] N/AE]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NO] UF- N/AE]degraded conditions?
 
No significant corrosion observed.
Status: YZ NE[] UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
No observed cracking in concrete near anchorage.
Location: Bldg. AUX                   Floor El. 772               Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and cable tray rigidly mounted.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Adequate clearance provided around all equipment.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Suspended lighting has appropriate safety wire.YED NEI UE] N/AE]YN NEI UE] N/AE]4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                               YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 380 of 451 Location:
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018
All anchorageis in good condition. No loose, missing, or broken.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads present, but have adequate clearances.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                   YZ NO] UF- N/AE]
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Combustibles stored in portable fire cabinet. Oil reservoirs have adequate clearance.
degraded conditions?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No significantcorrosion observed. No observed cracking in concrete near anchorage.
Temporary fire cabinet not restrained to prevent tipping, but adequate clearance to avoid interaction.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                         YED NEI UE] N/AE]
Other temporary equipment and storage with work-in-progress tags.YZ NEI UrI N/AZ Y0 NEI U-] N/A[-]YZ NEI UE- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-OXF-212-A002-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 381 of 451 Status: Y[ N[-- U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
All conduit and cable tray rigidly mounted.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial               YN NEI UE] N/AE]
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All anchorage is in good condition.
Adequate clearanceprovided around all equipment. Suspended lighting has appropriatesafety wire.
All items are rigidly mounted on steel. Some conduits are rod hung but have adequate clearance.
4 Ifthe room     in which the SWEL   item Is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
YZ ND U[-] N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NDI UD" N/AD1 degraded conditions?
This selected     area should be based on Judgment,   e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Mild surface corrosion present, no impact.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Rigidly mounted on structural tube steel.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Page 380 of 451
YED NDI UD- N/ADl YN NDI UD] N/ADl 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
 
This 6elected area should be based onJudgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 382 of 451 Location:
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI UrI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Oil reservoirs are clear of all objects. No expected spatial interactions.
Sprinkler heads present, but have adequate clearances.
YS NE] ULI N/AEl YS N]-1 U[] N/AZ 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y0 NEI  U-] N/A[-]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Combustibles storedin portable fire cabinet. Oil reservoirs have adequate clearance.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI UE- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary fire cabinet not restrainedto prevent tipping, but adequate clearance to avoid interaction. Other temporary equipment and storage with work-in-progresstags.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-OXF-212-A002-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           7-26-2012 Page 381 of 451
 
Status: Y[       N[-- U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 772                   Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YZ ND U[-] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorageis in good condition. All items are rigidly mounted on steel. Some conduits are rod hung but have adequate clearance.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YO NDI UD" N/AD1 degraded conditions?
Mild surface corrosionpresent, no impact.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YED NDI UD- N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Rigidly mounted on structuraltube steel.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YN NDI      UD] N/ADl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
4 If the room in   which the SWEL     item     is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should   be described.
This   6elected area   should be based     onJudgment,       e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 382 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NE] ULI N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS N]-1 U[] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Oil reservoirs are clear of all objects. No expected spatial interactions.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI  UrI N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
There is significant scaffolding in the area but it appears to be well restrained.
There is significant scaffolding in the area but it appears to be well restrained.
YZ NEI UrI N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NE] Ur]
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-OXF-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 383 of 451 Status: Y[ NE] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
All anchorage in good condition.
1-OXF-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-26-2012 Page 383 of 451
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
 
Anchorage is painted with only accumulated dust. No corrosion obvious.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All are rigidly supported and acceptable fill capacities.
Status: Y[     NE] U[-
HVAC is rigidly supported as well.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Possible issue with overhung duct work connected to fan (1-FAN 455). Original design calculation and drawings confirm the configuration.
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                   Floor El. 760               Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
YN NEI U[-1 N/AZl YZ NEI U-- N/AZl Y! NEI U-- N/AZl YN NEI U--1 N/AZ 4 If the rootm in. hih the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
This selected ares should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item.Page 384 of 451 Location:
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YN NEI U[-1 N/AZl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE] N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinklers present. Fire protection piping is rigidly mounted.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustible source observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
All anchoragein good condition.
None in the area.YZ NEI UEI N/AE YZ NEI UL- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YZ NEI U-- N/AZl degraded conditions?
Anchorage is painted with only accumulated dust. No corrosion obvious.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             Y!  NEI U-- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
All are rigidly supported and acceptablefill capacities. HVAC is rigidly supported as well.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YN NEI U--1 N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Possible issue with overhung duct work connected to fan (1-FAN             455). Originaldesign calculationand drawings confirm the configuration.
4 If the rootm in. hih the SWEL     item is located is very large (e.g., Turbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected     ares should be based   on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item.
Page 384 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 760           Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI UE] N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No sprinklerspresent. Fire protectionpiping is rigidly mounted.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UEI      N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustible source observed.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UL- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
None in the area.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI       U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
TS- 13-128A is missing a safety cable. Reinforced masonry wall in the area and is in good condition.
TS- 13-128A is missing a safety cable. Reinforced masonry wall in the area and is in good condition.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FAN-030-0447-A 1-FAN-030-0459-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 385 of 451 Status: YE Nr-- U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D106, WBN-WB-021 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
1-FAN-030-0447-A 1-FAN-030-0459-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               7-31-2012 Page 385 of 451
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
Status: YE Nr-- U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                   Floor El. 742                 Room, Area 4 D106, WBN-WB-021 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                       YN NEI U--1 N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage (equipment).
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage (equipment).
YN NEI U--1 N/AEl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI U-- N/AZl degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                           YN NEI U-- N/AZl degraded conditions?
All equipment anchorage painted and in good condition with exception of air receiver tanks. Observed mild surface corrosion on bottom hardware of receiver strap. (Not significant)
All equipment anchoragepainted and in good condition with exception of air receiver tanks. Observed mild surface corrosion on bottom hardware of receiver strap. (Not significant)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and ducting rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YED NZI UZ" N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Cable tray, conduit, and ducting rigidly supported and in good condition.
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YN NZJ UZ] N/AZJ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
Adequate clearancemaintainedaround equipment. Overheadlighting has safety chain/wire.
YED NZI UZ" N/AZ YN NZJ UZ] N/AZJ 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be des cri bed.This selected area should be based on judgment.
4 If the room in   which the SWEL     item   Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be des cri bed.
e.g., on the order of about 35 fet from the SWEL item.Page 386 of 451 Location:
This selected   area   should be based     on judgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 fet from the SWEL item.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 Q106, WBN-WB-021
Page 386 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No fire protection sprinkler heads. C02 system in place, adequately supported and in good condition.
 
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Lube oil and fuel lines rigidly mounted on skids. Flexible connection utilized between engine and generator skid/frame.
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 742           Room, Area 4 Q106, WBN-WB-021
Overhead lines rigidly supported as well.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UI N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No fire protection sprinkler heads. C02 system in place, adequately supported and in good condition.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Lube oil and fuel lines rigidly mounted on skids. Flexible connection utilized between engine and generatorskid/frame. Overhead lines rigidly supportedas well.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NOn UI- N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.
YZ NEI UI N/AD YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl YS NOn UI- N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[-] ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS N[-] ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
General housekeeping is reasonable.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Observed safety chain/restraint not attached to sensors 0-TS-13-119B, 119A, and 2 TS on north side of room (unable to read UNID/tag).
Generalhousekeeping is reasonable. Observed safety chain/restraintnot attached to sensors 0-TS-13-119B, 119A, and 2 TS on north side of room (unable to read UNID/tag). Observed I missing anchorbolt on pipe support 17A586-1-69 (south end of room). Calculation 17A58601069 for the support confirms the as-built configuration.
Observed I missing anchor bolt on pipe support 17A586-1-69 (south end of room). Calculation 17A58601069 for the support confirms the as-built configuration.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BA T-215-B-B 1-COMP-082-0210 1-DIEG-082-BI 1-DIEG-082-B2 1-GEN-082-OOOI B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 387 of 451 Status: YZ NE] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
1-BA T-215-B-B 1-COMP-082-0210 1-DIEG-082-BI 1-DIEG-082-B2 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 387 of 451
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
 
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Status: YZ NE] U[-
No loose, missing, or broken anchorage observed on equipment.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
YO N[] UI] N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UF- N/A[degraded conditions?
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                     Floor El. 742                 Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YO N[] UI] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No loose, missing, or broken anchorageobserved on equipment.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YZ NEI UF- N/A[
degraded conditions?
All hardware is painted or galvanized and in good condition.
All hardware is painted or galvanized and in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions(e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YZ NI] UI]'I N/AE3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions(e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.
Adequate clearance around equipment.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YZ NI] UI] N/A-I interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
See general comment about temperature sensor.YZ NI] UI]'I N/AE3 YZ NI] UI] N/A-I 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g.. TurbIne Hail), the area selected should be described.
Adequate clearance aroundequipment. See general comment about temperature sensor.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 femet from the SWEL item.Page 388 of 451 Location:
4 If the     room   In which   the SWEL   item is   located Is very large (e.g.. TurbIne Hail), the area   selected should be described.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022
This   selected     area   should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 femet from the SWEL   item.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler heads present. C02 fire protection system in place.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Lube oil! fuel line rigidly mounted to skid with flex connection between DG and Engine.YED NEI UD- N/AD YZ N[D] U[-- N/AD 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Page 388 of 451
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be adequately supported.
 
YID NEI UD- N/AD]8; Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG           Floor El. 742         Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022
TS- 13-120E and 120B missing safety chain/wire.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YED NEI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
TS- 13-120E could potentially impact panel/instrument of 2-PNL-82-A/1.
No sprinklerheads present. C02 fire protectionsystem in place.
(1 additional noted in walk-down of DG 2A-A). Observed missing anchor on pipe support near south end of room (tag not legible).
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ N[D] U[-- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Calculations for similar supports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration.
Lube oil! fuel line rigidly mounted to skid with flex connection between DG and Engine.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 389 of 451 Status: YO N[- ur-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YID NEI UD- N/AD]
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D107, WBN-WB-023 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Temporary scaffolding in place and appearsto be adequately supported.
8; Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NE] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
TS- 13-120E and 120B missing safety chain/wire. TS- 13-120E could potentially impact panel/instrumentof 2-PNL-82-A/1. (1 additionalnoted in walk-down of DG 2A-A). Observed missing anchor on pipe support near south end of room (tag not legible). Calculationsfor similarsupports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
2-GEN-082-0002A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 389 of 451
 
Status: YO     N[- ur-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                   Floor El. 742             Room, Area 4 D107, WBN-WB-023 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YN NEI U[-I N/A[
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No loose, missing, or broken anchorage observed on equipment.
No loose, missing, or broken anchorage observed on equipment.
YN NEI U[-I N/A[2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE N[-] UE'- N/AZ degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                     YE N[-] UE'- N/AZ degraded conditions?
All anchorage painted or galvanized.
All anchoragepainted or galvanized. Some mild surface oxidation near bottom of air receiver tanks.
Some mild surface oxidation near bottom of air receiver tanks.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit*
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit*                           YN NEI      U[E- N/AZ1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.
Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YM N[: UZ-I N/A[Z interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance around equipment.
Adequate clearance around equipment. Observed loose double nuts on trapeze support on north end of room.
Observed loose double nuts on trapeze support on north end of room.YN NEI U[E- N/AZ1 YM N[: UZ-I N/A[Z 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room In which        the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area. hould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 390 of 451 Location:
This   selected   area. hould   be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 Q107, WBN-WB-023
Page 390 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler heads present. C02 F. P. system in place.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Lube oil/fuel line rigidly supported and utilizes flex connections.
 
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 742         Room, Area 4 Q107, WBN-WB-023
Rolling scaffolding on north side of room; it appears to be restrained properly.YE NEI UI-- N/AE3 YN NEI U0I N/ALZ YN NE-1 U[-D N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YE NEI UI-- N/AE3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Observed (2) temperature sensors on south end and (3) on east end all missing safety chains. Light on south end of room is burnt out. One missing bolt on pipe support 17A586-1-92.
No sprinklerheads present. C02 F.P. system in place.
Calculation 17A58601092 for support confirms as-built configuration.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI U0I    N/ALZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 391 of 451 Status: Y[ N[-- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Lube oil/fuel line rigidly supported and utilizes flex connections.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NE-1 U[-D N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Rolling scaffolding on north side of room; it appearsto be restrained properly.
All anchorage is free of loose, missing, or broken.YED NEI UE] N/Al!2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEIl U-] N/AE]degraded conditions?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NEI   UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
No observed degradation or corrosion.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit and piping are rigidly supported.
Observed (2) temperature sensors on south end and (3) on east end all missing safety chains. Light on south end of room is burnt out. One missing bolt on pipe support 17A586-1-92. Calculation 17A58601092 for support confirms as-built configuration.
Cable tray does not appear overloaded.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
2-GEN-082-0002B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             7-31-2012 Page 391 of 451
Adequate clearances around equipment.
 
YZ NEI U[] N/AL!YZ NEI UE] N/AZ 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area. elected should be described.
Status: Y[     N[-- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 392 of 451 Location:
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 737                 Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads have appropriate clearance and support.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UI- N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed fuel source/combustibles.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YC9 NDI UD- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                       YED NEI UE] N/Al!
Observed housekeeping/portable equipment issues noted in general comments.
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Comments do not adversely affect equipment in area.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UD-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
All anchorageis free of loose, missing, or broken.
* Job box not restrained (near CCS booster pump 2A and B)* Rolling cart not restrained
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YZ NEIl U-] N/AE]
* 50 gallon drums with loose chain around base* Some bulbs burnt out in the area The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-HTX-078-0031 0-HTX-078-0032 O-PMP-078-0009-B O-PMP-078-0035-S 0-TS-030-0192B-A 1-FCV-067-0213-A 1-FCV-067-0215-B 1-PMP-070-0131-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 393 of 451 Status: Y[I N[] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
degraded conditions?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
No observed degradationor corrosion.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                   YZ NEI U[] N/AL!
Observed anchor bolts on several pipe supports are not true-one was bent but still should function as intended.YZ NEI U[[ N/AE1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YS NEI ULi N/All degraded conditions?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray, conduit and piping are rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearoverloaded.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                         YZ NEI UE] N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearancesaround equipment.
4 If the room in   which the SWEL     item   is located is very large   (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area. elected should be described.
This selected   area   should be based     on judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from the SWEL   item.
Page 392 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 737           Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI   UE1 N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinklerheads have appropriateclearance and support.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI UI- N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed fuel source/combustibles.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YC9 NDI UD- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Observed housekeeping/portableequipment issues noted in general comments. Comments do not adversely affect equipment in area.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI UD-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
* Job box not restrained(nearCCS boosterpump 2A and B)
* Rolling cart not restrained
* 50 gallon drums with loose chain around base
* Some bulbs burnt out in the area The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
0-HTX-078-0031 0-HTX-078-0032 O-PMP-078-0009-B O-PMP-078-0035-S 0-TS-030-0192B-A 1-FCV-067-0213-A 1-FCV-067-0215-B 1-PMP-070-0131-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-1-2012 Page 393 of 451
 
Status: Y[I N[] U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 782             Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YZ NEI U[[ N/AE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Observed anchorbolts on several pipe supports are not true-one was bent but still should function as intended.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YS NEI ULi N/All degraded conditions?
ACU Units have minor surface corrosion.
ACU Units have minor surface corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduil:
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduil:                                   YED NEI        U[E1 N/AE1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit, cable tray, and raceway are rigidly supported and adequately supported.
All conduit, cable tray, and raceway are rigidly supported and adequatelysupported. Fill levels look acceptable. HVAC duct is rod hung but has good clearance around it.
Fill levels look acceptable.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YN NEI UEr          N/A[E interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
HVAC duct is rod hung but has good clearance around it.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No ceiling tiles present and lights are secured with safety cables.
No ceiling tiles present and lights are secured with safety cables.YED NEI U[E1 N/AE1 YN NEI UEr N/A[E 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very Iarge (e.g.., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room in     which   the SWEL     item Is located Is very Iarge (e.g.., Turbine Haii),     the area selected should   be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 394 of 451 Location:
This selected     area   should be based   on judgment, e.g., on the order   of about 35   feet   from the SWEL   item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025
Page 394 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?All piping appears to be correctly supported.
 
All sprinklers have 2" minimum clearance.
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 782           Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustible sources observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y0 NDI UD' N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Step ladder is not stowed per "TI-276";
All piping appears to be correctly supported.All sprinklers have 2" minimum clearance.
it has a rope restraining it.Y0 NDI UD' N/AD-YZ NDI UD- N/A[']YZ NEI UD" N/AD 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDI U[[adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Cover plate removed and improperly stored on 1-A CU-30-CRB Control Rod Drive EQRM Air Conditioner 1B.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NDI UD- N/A[']
Several lights are out in the area. Observed monorail support structure with only (3) anchor bolts installed.
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
There are only 3 holes in the base plate. By engineering judgment, the frame is structurally sound. Not a significant concern.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-GEN-085-A 1-GEN-085-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 395 of 451 Status: NE-- U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
No combustible sources observed.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UD" N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage  
Step ladder is not stowed per "TI-276"; it has a rope restrainingit.
°of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if Visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YE NDI U[[
All anchorage visible was in very good condition.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
All hardware was in place and tight. No significant cracking observed.YZ NE] U[-] N/AEl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NO] UE] N/AZ1 degraded conditions?
Cover plate removed and improperly stored on 1-A CU-30-CRB Control Rod Drive EQRM Air Conditioner 1B.
All surfaces are painted and free of corrosion.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Some mild surface corrosion was observed on some surfaces where paint has chipped or worn away.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray and conduit are rigidly mounted. HVAC is a combination of rod hung and rigid. However, both are good.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Several lights are out in the area. Observed monorail support structure with only (3) anchorbolts installed. There are only 3 holes in the base plate. By engineeringjudgment, the frame is structurally sound. Not a significant concern.
There is good clearance between items in the area. Very congested area but still has adequate clearance.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
YZ NEI U[ N/AZl YZ NEI UE] N/AZ1 4 Ifthe room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), th earea. elected should be described.
1-GEN-085-A 1-GEN-085-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-2-2012 Page 395 of 451
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet frot the SWEL item.Page 396 of 451 Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026
Status: YE* NE--         U--
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinklers in the area. All fire water piping is rigidly supported.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
All other piping has proper supports.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustible sources observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX                 Floor El. 757               Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Observed (2) fire extinguisher bottles on portable cart that are not properly restrained per "TI-276".
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Two flammable storage cabinets with no restraint  
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
.....continued under general comments.YZ NE] UE- N/AZ3 YZ NEI UE] N/AZ YS NEi U['] N/AZ'8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NE] UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 1. Does anchorage °of equipment in the area appear to be free of                             YZ NE] U[-] N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if Visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorage visible was in very good condition. All hardwarewas in place and tight. No significant cracking observed.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                   YN NO] UE] N/AZ1 degraded conditions?
All surfaces are painted and free of corrosion. Some mild surface corrosion was observed on some surfaces where paint has chipped or worn away.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                         YZ NEI U[          N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray and conduit are rigidly mounted. HVAC is a combination of rod hung and rigid. However, both are good.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial               YZ NEI        UE] N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
There is good clearancebetween items in the area. Very congested area but still has adequate clearance.
4 Ifthe room   In which the SWEL   item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), th earea. elected should   be described.
This selected area should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet frot the SWEL   item.
Page 396 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YZ NE] UE- N/AZ3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No sprinklers in the area. All fire water piping is rigidly supported. All other piping has proper supports.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YZ NEI UE] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustible sources observed.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YS NEi      U['] N/AZ' interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Observed (2) fire extinguisherbottles on portable cart that are not properlyrestrainedper "TI-276". Two flammable storage cabinets with no restraint..... continued under general comments.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YS NE] UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Barrels not properly stored. TE stored under the stairs not chained to within "2". Poor housekeeping.
Barrels not properly stored. TE stored under the stairs not chained to within "2". Poor housekeeping.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-COMP-032-0060 0-COMP-032-0086 0-FCV-032-0082-A 1-TANK-070-0001 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 397 of 451 Status: YN NE] UF]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A854, WBN-WB-027 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
0-COMP-032-0060 0-COMP-032-0086 0-FCV-032-0082-A 1-TANK-070-0001 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                                 8-2-2012 Page 397 of 451
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
All anchorage is painted and well maintained.
Status: YN NE] UF]
No visible cracks, missing hardware, loose, or damaged hardware.YE NEI UE- N/AD 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YI NEI U-1 N/AE3 degraded conditions?
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                           Floor El. 772                 Room, Area4 A854, WBN-WB-027 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                                 YE NEI          UE- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorage is painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware,loose, or damaged hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                                     YI     NEI     U-1 N/AE3 degraded conditions?
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                             YN NE! UE- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
No interaction or overload issues.4. Does it appear that the area, is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interaction or overload issues.
: 4. Does it appear that the area, is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                                 YN NEI U-] N/AO interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
YN NE! UE- N/AZl YN NEI U-] N/AO 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall). the area selected should be described.
4 If the     room   in which   the SWEL   item Is located is very large   (e.g., Turbine Hall). the   area   selected   should   be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 398 of 451 Location:
This   selected     area should     be based on judgment,     e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet   from     the   SWEL     item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A854, WBN-WB-027
Page 398 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance.
 
No other flooding concerns.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?All batteries are secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source. Wood scaffolding is present, but would be protected by sprinklers in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A854, WBN-WB-027
Observed wooden scaffolding in the room. Per procedure MMTP-102, wood scaffolding is evaluated by site SE. Scaffolding appears to be adequately restrained.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YS NEI UL] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
YS NEI UL] N/AZ YZ NEI U"] N/AU YZ N[] Ur-l N/AL]8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Sprinkler heads are presentand have adequate clearance. No other flooding concerns.
Housekeeping in this area is very good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0001-D Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 399 of 451 Status: YN No- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI U"] N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
All batteriesare secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source. Wood scaffolding is present, but would be protected by sprinklers in the area.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ N[] Ur-l N/AL]
All anchorage is painted and well maintained.
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No visible cracks, missing hardware, loose, or damaged hardware.YED NE- U-- N/AE-1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UE] N/AE]degraded conditions?
Observed wooden scaffolding in the room. Perprocedure MMTP-102, wood scaffolding is evaluated by site SE. Scaffolding appears to be adequately restrained.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEi   Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping in this area is very good.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-BA T-236-0001-D Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-2-2012 Page 399 of 451
 
Status: YN No- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                           Floor El. 772                   Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                           YED NE- U-- N/AE-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorageis painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware,loose, or damaged hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                               YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
No interaction or overload issues.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interactionor overload issues.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YO N-' UE1 N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE-YO N-' UE1 N/AE]4 If the roo. in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the roo. in which     the SWEL     item   Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area. hould be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet fro. the SWEL item.Page 400 of 451 Location:
This selected     area. hould   be based     on Judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 feet fro. the SWEL item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028
Page 400 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance.
 
No other flooding concerns.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?All batteries are secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028
Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.YO NEI UE- N/AEl YO NEI ULI N/AE Y[ NE UE1 N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Housekeeping is excellent The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0002-E Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 401 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance. No other flooding concerns.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-029 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO NEI    ULI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All batteriesare secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.
All anchorage visible is painted and well maintained.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     Y[  NE UE1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No visible cracks, missing hardware, loose, or damaged hardware.YED NEI UE- N/AZ1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN N-] U[] N/AZ degraded conditions?
Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-BA T-236-0002-E Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-2-2012 Page 401 of 451
 
Status: Y[     NEI     UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                             Floor El. 772                   Room, Area4 A864, WBN-WB-029 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                             YED NEI UE- N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchoragevisible is painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware, loose, or damaged hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                                 YN N-] U[] N/AZ degraded conditions?
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                         YN NEI UiE N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
No interaction or overload issues.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interaction or overload issues.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                               YO NEI U--i N/A-1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance.
YN NEI UiE N/AZ YO NEI U--i N/A-1 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is locate d Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room in     which     the SWEL     item   is locate d Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected   should be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 402 of 451 Location:
This   selected   area   should     be based     on judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-029
Page 402 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance.
 
No other flooding concerns.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?All batteries are secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-029
Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.YS NEI U[-1 N/AZ YN N[l UL- N/AL!YO NEI UE! N/AE3 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI U[-1 N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance.No other flooding concerns.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN N[l UL- N/AL!
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
All batteries are secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NEI UE! N/AE3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[   NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Housekeeping is excellent.
Housekeeping is excellent.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 403 of 451 Status: Y[:] NZ UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
O-BA T-236-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-2-2012 Page 403 of 451
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
All MCCs welded to embed, new charger with bolts all in good condition.
Status: Y[:] NZ UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
YO NEI UE-1 N/A[2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 772               Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                   YO NEI          UE-1 N/A[
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All MCCs welded to embed, new chargerwith bolts all in good condition.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?
All welds painted with some minor chipping, bolts are galvanized.
All welds painted with some minor chipping, bolts are galvanized.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appear to be overfilled.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               YN NEI UEi N/AE raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearto be overfilled.
HVAC duct is rigidly supported and in good condition.
HVAC duct is rigidly supported and in good condition.
YN NEI UEi N/AE 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YZ NEI UEi N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Cable tray support cap plate in close proximity to conduit (IPLC-803A) collar (top of MCC-213-A2, Panel 13). Upon further review with FRC it was deemed to have adequate clearance.
Cable tray support cap plate in close proximity to conduit (IPLC-803A) collar (top of MCC-213-A2, Panel 13). Upon further review with FRC it was deemed to have adequate clearance.
YZ NEI UEi N/All 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turblne HaiI), the area selected should be described.
4 If the room   In which the SWEL item     Is located Is very large (e.g., Turblne HaiI), the area   selected   should   be described.
This selected area ahould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item.Page 404 of 451 Location:
This selected     area ahould be based on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from   the   SWEL Item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030
Page 404 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler head touching conduit (PLC-1 709), behind panel 10 of 1-MCC-213-A I.. All other sprinkler heads have adequate clearance.
 
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles observed in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030
Temporary scaffolding in area appears to be restrained properly.Rolling scaffold (113652196) tied-off with chain in (2) spots.YI- NO UI- N/AZI YO N[-- U-1 N/AZI YZ N[-- UI1 N/A-1 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YI- NO UI- N/AZI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
General housekeeping is reasonable.
Sprinkler head touching conduit (PLC-1 709), behind panel 10 of 1-MCC-213-A I.. All other sprinklerheads have adequate clearance.
Some work-in-progress, but well maintained.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO N[-- U-1 N/AZI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-MCC-213-AOOI-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 405 of 451 Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
No combustibles observed in the area.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D204. WBN-WB-031 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ N[-- UI1 N/A-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Temporary scaffolding in area appears to be restrainedproperly.
Rolling scaffold (113652196) tied-off with chain in (2) spots.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is reasonable. Some work-in-progress,but well maintained.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-MCC-213-AOOI-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-3-2012 Page 405 of 451
 
Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG                   Floor El. 760               Room, Area 4 D204. WBN-WB-031 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YZ NE        UE-] N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All cabinets welded to embed plates and in good condition.
All cabinets welded to embed plates and in good condition.
YZ NE UE-] N/AE]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U-] N/AE]degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YZ NE] U-] N/AE]
All welds painted with minor chipping.
degraded conditions?
No observed corrosion.
All welds painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YN NE] UE] N/AF-"
Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded.
Adequate clearance maintained around all equipment.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     Y* NEI UE] N/AE-interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN NE] UE] N/AF-"NEI UE] N/AE-4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
Adequate clearance maintainedaround all equipment.
This selected areas hould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fet fro. the SWEL item.Page 406 of 451 Location:
4 If the room in   which   the SWEL     item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   Hall), the area selected should   be described.
Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 Q204, WBN-WB-031
This selected   areas hould   be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 fet   fro. the SWEL   item.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flood source. C02 fire protection system utilized.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No fuel source observed in the area. No stored combustibles.
Page 406 of 451
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
Location: Bldg. DG BLDG         Floor El. 760           Room, Area 4   Q204, WBN-WB-031
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NIl ULI N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No flood source. C02 fire protectionsystem utilized.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y0 NEI UI- N/Al]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No fuel source observed in the area. No stored combustibles.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YM Nil U[] N/Al]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No temporary equipment or installations.
No temporary equipment or installations.
YN NIl ULI N/AE]Y0 NEI UI- N/Al]YM Nil U[] N/Al]8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?YZ NEIUE1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NEIUE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
General housekeeping is good. TS-13-132A (above 1-MCC-215-AO02) does not have a safety chain.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 407 of 451 Status: YE] NZ ULJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Generalhousekeeping is good. TS-13-132A (above 1-MCC-215-AO02) does not have a safety chain.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-6-2012 Page 407 of 451
 
Status: YE] NZ         ULJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                   Floor El. 786                 Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 Yr-] NO UE] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Sheared bolt on 1-COND-31-289.
Sheared bolt on 1-COND-31-289.
Yr-] NO UE] N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UE] N/A--degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                     YO NEI UE] N/A--
Significant corrosion on 1-ACU-31-475 and 1-COND-31-289.
degraded conditions?
After further review, deemed to be moderate corrosion.
Significant corrosion on 1-ACU-31-475 and 1-COND-31-289. After further review, deemed to be moderate corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduit and ducting rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             YO NE] UE] N/AZ3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC has flexible connections.
Conduit and ducting rigidly supported. HVAC has flexible connections.
YO NE] UE] N/AZ3 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YIO NEI] U] N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YIO NEI] U] N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overhead lighting has safety chains. Adequate clearance around equipment.
Overhead lighting has safety chains. Adequate clearance around equipment.
4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall). the area selected should be described.
4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL   item   is located is very large   (e.g., Turbine Hall). the area selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 f.et from the SWEL item.Page 408 of 451 Location:
This selected area should be based     on Judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 f.et from the SWEL item.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032
Page 408 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Coolant lines present but adequately supported with proper drainage.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles present 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 786           Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Coolant lines present but adequately supported with properdrainage.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YED NEI U-- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustibles present
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NO U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No temporary equipment or installations.
No temporary equipment or installations.
YN NEI Ur- N/AZ YED NEI U-- N/AZ YZ NO U-- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UZ--
Observed (5) Lights out in room. Fairly moist/wet environment.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FSV-031-0447-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 409 of 451 Status: Y[ NEI] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Observed (5) Lights out in room. Fairlymoist/wet environment.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
No loose, missing, or broken.YZ NI] UE- N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UI] N/All degraded conditions?
1-FSV-031-0447-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-6-2012 Page 409 of 451
All hardware is painted and in good condition.
 
No observed degradation.
Status: Y[     NEI] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduit rigidly supported and in good condition.
Location: Bldg. AUX                         Floor El. 692                 Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
YN NI] UI- N/AZl YO NI] UIl N/AZl 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hail), the area selected should be described.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YZ NI] UE- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
This selected area should be based onjudgment.
No loose, missing, or broken.
e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 410 of 451 Location:
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YO NEI UI] N/All degraded conditions?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033
All hardware is painted and in good condition. No observed degradation.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads present, but no observed clearance issues.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles in area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YN NI] UI- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Conduit rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YO NI] UIl N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance maintained aroundequipment.
4 If the room   In which the SWEL     item     is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hail), the area selected should be described.
This selected     area   should be based     onjudgment.       e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Page 410 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 692           Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Sprinkler heads present,but no observed clearanceissues.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI U-I N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No combustibles in area.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI U-I N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding present, but appears to have adequate clearance and proper restraint.
Temporary scaffolding present, but appears to have adequate clearance and proper restraint.
YE NEI U-1 N/AEl YN NEI U-I N/AEl YZ NEI U-I N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Removable masonry black wall present. Restrained with steel straps and anchored to concrete wall. In good condition.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI Ur1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Removable masonry black wall present. Restrained with steel straps and anchored to concrete wall. In good condition.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-062-0093 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 411 of 451 Status: Y[ NR' U[-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Generalhousekeeping is good.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
1-FCV-062-0093 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-6-2012 Page 411 of 451
 
Status: Y[     NR'     U[-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 692                 Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YE NEI UI- N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
YE NEI UI- N/AZ1 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/AE]degraded conditions?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YE NE] UE] N/AE]
No observed degradation or corrosion.
degraded conditions?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Overhead conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
No observed degradationor corrosion.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
Adequate clearance around equipment.
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
Overhead conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
YZ NE] UE] N/AE]YZ NE] UE] N/AE]4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the areas elected should be described.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 412 of 451 Location:
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034
Adequate clearance around equipment. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE' N/A[-]interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and piping appears to be adequately supported.
4 If the room in     which the SWEL item     is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   HaiI), the areas elected should be described.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE- UE-1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
This selected     area should be based on Judgment,     e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Temporary scaffolding present, but appears be properly restrained with adequate clearance.
Page 412 of 451
Work-in-progress equipment in area with tag and housekeeping barrier tape. Rolling scaffolding chained in two places.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
 
Fall harness stored under pipe chase cooler 1A-A (1-CLR-30-20 1). Loose unistrut supports on floor without work-in-progress tag (no interaction concern).
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 692           Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034
Located on north side of pipe chase cooler.Deemed work-in-progress.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI UE' N/A[-]
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-LCV-062-O135-A 1-LCV-062-O136-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 413 of 451 Status: YE N-- U[Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Sprinklerheads have adequate clearance and piping appears to be adequatelysupported.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NEI UE- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
All equipment anchorage appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
No observed combustibles in the area.
YO NE] Ur- N/AD-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ ND] UD- N/AD]degraded conditions?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NE- UE-1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No significant degradation.
Temporary scaffolding present, but appears be properly restrained with adequate clearance. Work-in-progress equipment in area with tag and housekeeping barriertape. Rolling scaffolding chained in two places.
Most surfaces painted with minor chipping and mild surface corrosion.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appear to be overloaded.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Fall harness stored under pipe chase cooler 1A-A (1-CLR-30-20 1). Loose unistrutsupports on floor without work-in-progress tag (no interactionconcern). Located on north side of pipe chase cooler.
Deemed work-in-progress.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-LCV-062-O135-A 1-LCV-062-O136-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-6-2012 Page 413 of 451
 
Status: YE N-- U[
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. TURB                       Floor El. 708                 Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YO NE] Ur- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All equipment anchorageappearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YZ ND] UD- N/AD]
degraded conditions?
No significant degradation.Most surfaces painted with minor chipping and mild surface corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YN NDI UD N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded.
Conduit rigidly supported as well. Piping adequately supported.
Conduit rigidly supported as well. Piping adequately supported.
YN NDI UD N/ADl 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YE NEI UD" N/AD1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment and piping.YE NEI UD" N/AD1'If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is .ery large (e.g., Turbine Hail), the area selected should be described.
Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment and piping.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 414 of 451 Location:
'If the room in     which the SWEL     item Is   located Is
Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035
                                                            .ery   large (e.g., Turbine Hail),   the area selected should be described.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler heads present. No other concerns.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Oily waste container present and stored/restrained.
This selected   area   should be based   on judgment,     e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet   from the SWEL   item.
No other combustibles observed.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Page 414 of 451
Exhaust fans in area with wheel locks engaged. Scaffolding staging area well maintained/stored.
 
See general comments.YN N[-] U[] N/A[l YZ NEI U[W N/AW Y2 NEI UE- N/AW 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr- Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Location: Bldg. TURB           Floor El. 708           Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035
General housekeeping is good. Some temporary scaffolding, but appears to have adequate restraint and clearance.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN N[-] U[] N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Job box not restrained (chain present but not secure). Rolling conduit storage with (1)wheel lock (mechanical).
No sprinklerheads present. No other concerns.
Several 50 gal. drums, trash can, and oil container not restrained.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI    U[W N/AW interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
All deemed to be work-in-progress.
Oily waste containerpresent and stored/restrained.No other combustibles observed.
Not a significant concern. Observed bolt missing on 0-HTX-32-27 A/B. Determined to be non-safety related equipment and therefore is not a potential adverse seismic condition.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y2 NEI UE- N/AW interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-COMP-032-0026 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 415 of 451 Status: Y[ N[-- U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Exhaust fans in area with wheel locks engaged. Scaffolding staging area well maintained/stored.See general comments.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YZ Nr-    Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
All visible anchorage appears to be free of any adverse seismic conditions.
General housekeeping is good. Some temporary scaffolding, but appearsto have adequate restraint and clearance. Job box not restrained(chain present but not secure). Rolling conduit storage with (1) wheel lock (mechanical). Several 50 gal. drums, trash can, and oil containernot restrained.All deemed to be work-in-progress.Not a significantconcern. Observed bolt missing on 0-HTX-32-27 A/B. Determinedto be non-safety related equipment and therefore is not a potential adverse seismic condition.
No loose, missing, or broken hardware.YE NEI UrI N/AEl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ Ni] ULI N/AEl degraded conditions?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
No significant degradation.
0-COMP-032-0026 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-7-2012 Page 415 of 451
Some mild surface corrosion except on 0-PMP-31-49/1 (moderate to significant).
 
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition.
Status: Y[   N[--   U[-
Cable tray is not overloaded.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Location: Bldg. AUX                         Floor El. 737                 Room, Area 4 A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Adequate clearance around equipment.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Piping properly supported.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
YZ NI] UEJ N/AZl YZ NI] U[] N/All 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is I ocated is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YE NEI UrI N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 416 of 451 Location:
All visible anchorageappears to be free of any adverse seismic conditions. No loose, missing, or broken hardware.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A 13-R.WBN-WB-036
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                               YZ Ni] ULI N/AEl degraded conditions?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No significant degradation.Some mild surface corrosion except on 0-PMP-31-49/1 (moderate to significant).
Unit 2 work-in-progress.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YZ NI] UEJ N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Appears to be properly tagged and stored.YS NEI UEI N/AZ YN NEI U-1 N/AEl YN NEI U-1 N/AEl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition. Cable tray is not overloaded.
Unistrut strap on top of tube steel frame (7' southwest of A15-R).The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 417 of 451 Status: YE NEI U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YZ NI] U[] N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Adequate clearance around equipment. Piping properly supported.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
4 If the      room  In which the SWEL    item is I ocated is very large   (e.g., Turbine   Haii), the area selected should be described.
No observed loose, missing, or broken hardware.YE NEI UE] N/AL]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI U-1 N/A--degraded conditions?
This   selected     area should be based on judgment,       e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
No significant degradation.
Page 416 of 451
Some mild surface corrosion.
 
Most hardware is painted and in good condition.
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 737           Room, Area 4 A 13-R. WBN-WB-036
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduit and large bore piping is rigidly supported.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI UEI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
All other piping is adequately supported.
Adequate clearance aroundsprinkler heads.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Adequate clearance around equipment.
No observed combustibles/fuel source.
Chillers covered by tube steel frame and sheet metal. Lights have safety chain/wire.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
YO NEI Uil N/AZl YZ NEI U-- N/AZl 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
Unit 2 work-in-progress.Appears to be properly tagged and stored.
This selected area should be base d on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 418 of 451 Location:
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UiZ N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] Ui N/A--interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UEi N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Unistrutstrap on top of tube steel frame (7' southwest of A15-R).
Motor stored on cart with mechanical wheel locks. Work-in-progress staged equipment/panels not properly restrained (no interaction concern, in process of being removed).
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Service cart with wire restraint and wheel stop (planned removal date expired).8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi UiE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-7-2012 Page 417 of 451
General housekeeping is good. Trashcan not restrained (housekeeping).
 
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0128 O-CHR-031-0129 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 419 of 451 Status: YN No UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Status: YE NEI U--
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Location: Bldg. CNTL                   Floor El. 692               Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
6.9KV cabinets have all (6) anchors per panel. Relay panels are welded to embed plates.YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant YI NE] U-- N/AZ degraded conditions?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No observed degradation or corrosion.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
All visible anchorage is in good condition.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                               YE NEI        UE] N/AL]
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appear to be overloaded.
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Ducting is rigidly supported as well.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No observed loose, missing, or broken hardware.
Overhead lighting has safety chains/wire.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                   YE NEI U-1 N/A--
Equipment has adequate clearances.
degraded conditions?
YN N["] UZ- N/AZl YE NEI UZ- N/AZ 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
No significantdegradation. Some mild surface corrosion.Most hardware is painted and in good condition.
This selected area should be b a.sed on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 420 of 451 Location:
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                           YO NEI Uil N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038
Conduit and large bore piping is rigidly supported. All otherpiping is adequately supported.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads. Piping is adequately supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                 YZ NEI U-- N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Adequate clearance around equipment. Chillers covered by tube steel frame and sheet metal. Lights have safety chain/wire.
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be restrained properly.Portable job boxes and ladders restrained.
4 If the room in which   the SWEL item     is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should   be described.
Rolling scaffolding in front of 2-BD-21 1-B with wheel locks and (2) chains.YS NE U-- N/AW YZ NErI UI N/AE YN NEI Ur- N/AW3 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NWI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?No other observed potential adverse seismic conditions.
This   selected area   should be base d on Judg   ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Page 418 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. CNTL           Floor El. 692           Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UiZ N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Adequate clearance around sprinklerheads.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NE] Ui     N/A--
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles/fuel source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       Y[   NEI UEi N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Motor stored on cart with mechanical wheel locks. Work-in-progress staged equipment/panelsnot properly restrained(no interaction concern, in process of being removed). Service cartwith wire restraint and wheel stop (plannedremoval date expired).
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YN NEi UiE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good. Trashcan not restrained(housekeeping).
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-CHR-031-0128 O-CHR-031-0129 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-7-2012 Page 419 of 451
 
Status: YN No UD--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                           Floor El. 757             Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                     YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
6.9KV cabinets have all (6) anchorsper panel. Relay panels are welded to embed plates.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant                         YI   NE] U-- N/AZ degraded conditions?
No observed degradationor corrosion.All visible anchorage is in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                 YN N["] UZ- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded.
Ducting is rigidly supported as well.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                       YE    NEI UZ- N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overheadlighting has safety chains/wire. Equipment has adequate clearances.
4 If the     room   In which the SWEL     item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
This   selected     area   should be b a.sed on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Page 420 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YS NE    U-- N/AW interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Adequate clearance around sprinklerheads. Pipingis adequately supported.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NErI UI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles/fuel source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI Ur- N/AW3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be restrainedproperly.
Portablejob boxes and ladders restrained.Rolling scaffolding in front of 2-BD-21 1-B with wheel locks and (2) chains.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NWI   U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
No other observed potential adverse seismic conditions.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good. Work-in-progress well maintained/stored and labeled.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1 -BD-21 1-B-B 2-BD-21 1-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 421 of 451 Status: Nr- UD--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
General housekeeping is good. Work-in-progress well maintained/storedand labeled.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A803, WBN-WB-039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
1-BD-21 1-B-B 2-BD-21 1-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-8-2012 Page 421 of 451
Cabinets/panels welded to embed plates. Switches and dist. panels bolted to wall. All visible anchorage appears to be in place.YN NEI U-] N/AZI 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
 
(AWC)                                                                        Status: Y[* Nr- UD--
Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 757                   Room, Area 4 A803, WBN-WB-039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                       YN NEI U-] N/AZI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Cabinets/panelswelded to embed plates. Switches and dist. panels bolted to wall. All visible anchorage appears to be in place.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YE NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
Welds are painted, no observed damage or corrosion.
Welds are painted, no observed damage or corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                   YED NZI UF] N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                         YE NE] U-] N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance maintained around all equipment.
Adequate clearance maintainedaround all equipment. Observed scaffolding within 1/4" of cabinet (0-BD-236-2/4). After further review, clearancewas deemed to be acceptable.
Observed scaffolding within 1/4" of cabinet (0-BD-236-2/4).
4 If the   room in which the SWEL item       Is located I.... y large (e.g., Turbine Halt),   the area   selected should be described.
After further review, clearance was deemed to be acceptable.
This selected area should     be based   on Judgment,   e.g.,   on the order of about 35 feet   from the   SWEL   item.
YED NZI UF] N/AZl YE NE] U-] N/AZ1 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located I ....y large (e.g., Turbine Halt), the area selected should be described.
Page 422 of 451
This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 422 of 451 Location:
 
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A803.WBN-WB-039
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A803. WBN-WB-039
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No sprinkler head clearance issues observed.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No combustibles observed in area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO N[] U[-- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be restrained properly.See question 4.YO N[] U[-- N/AZ YN NEI U[-] N/AZ YZ N[E UEZ N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No sprinkler head clearance issues observed.
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-DXF-237-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 423 of 451 Status: NEI Ur]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI U[-] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 480V Board Rm 1B, WBN-WB-040 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
No combustibles observed in area.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ N[E UEZ N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
All MCCs and Shutdown BDs welded to embed plates. At least 50-75%of bolts observed on front of Shutdown BD anchorage.
Temporary scaffolding in place and appearsto be restrainedproperly.
YZ NEI UF] N/A[2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UI-] N/AEF degraded conditions?
See question 4.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-DXF-237-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-8-2012 Page 423 of 451
 
Status: YE* NEI Ur]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                       Floor El. 757               Room, Area 4 480V BoardRm 1B, WBN-WB-040 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                   YZ NEI UF] N/A[
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All MCCs and Shutdown BDs welded to embed plates. At least 50-75%
of bolts observed on front of Shutdown BD anchorage.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                         YZ NEI UI-] N/AEF degraded conditions?
Welds are painted, observed bolts are free of corrosion.
Welds are painted, observed bolts are free of corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC ducting and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               YN NEI UFI N/ACl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray does not appear overloaded.
HVAC ducting and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition.
Conduit rigidly supported as well.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Cable tray does not appearoverloaded. Conduit rigidly supported as well.
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YN NEl UI          N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Equipment has adequate clearance.
Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. Equipment has adequate clearance.
YN NEI UFI N/ACl YN NEl UI N/AEl 4 If the room In w hich the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the  room    In  w hich the SWEL   item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   Hall), the area selected should   be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL ite .Page 424 of 451 Location:
This selected     area should be based   on judgment, e.g., on the order   of about 35 feet from the SWEL   ite   .
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 480V Board Rm lB, WBN-WB-040
Page 424 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UE] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No observed clearance issues with sprinkler heads. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
 
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI U-- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles.
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 480V Board Rm lB, WBN-WB-040
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U["] N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI UE] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to have adequate clearance and restraint.
No observed clearance issues with sprinklerheads. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NErI Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YED NEI U-- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
General housekeeping is good. Observed cable transition from conduit through floor without flex conduit (north end of shutdown boards). After further review, deemed to not have any seismic related significance or concern.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-BOO1-B 1-BD-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 425 of 451 Status: YE NF-J UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
No observed combustibles.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NE] U["] N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to have adequate clearanceand restraint.
Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.YN NE UF] N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] U-] N/AZ]degraded conditions?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YED NErI Ur]
All anchorage is painted with minor chipping.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
No observed corrosion.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and ducting is rigidly supported.
General housekeeping is good. Observed cable transitionfrom conduit through floor without flex conduit (north end of shutdown boards). After further review, deemed to not have any seismic related significance or concern.
All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
1-BD-212-BOO1-B 1-BD-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                             8-9-2012 Page 425 of 451
No observed interaction concerns.
 
Adequate clearance maintained around air handlers and piping.YEK NEI UZ- N/AZl YN NEI U-1 N/AZl 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
Status: YE NF-J UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
This selected area should be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 foet from the SWEL item.Page 426 of 451 Location:
Location: Bldg. AUX                             Floor El. 757               Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate sprinkler head clearance.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YN NE UF] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles.
Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                               YE NE] U-] N/AZ]
No observed temporary equipment or installations.
degraded conditions?
YN NEI Ur-- N/A[YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ YS NEI U-- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NE-1 U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-AHU-031-0045 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 427 of 451 Status: YE N[-] U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                       YEK NEI UZ- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Cable tray, conduit, and ducting is rigidly supported.All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                             YN NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No observed missing, loose, or damaged hardware.YN NEI Ur- N/Ar-I 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?
No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearance maintained around air handlers and piping.
Most visible anchorage is painted or galvanized.
4 If the room in     which     the SWEL     item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine   Haii), the area selected should be described.
No observed degradation or corrosion.
This   selected   area   should     be based   on Judg ment, e.g., on the order   of about 35 foet   from the SWEL   item.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Overhead conduit and piping is rigidly supported.
Page 426 of 451
YN Nil UZl N/AZ-4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
 
Observed FCV with 1" clearance to pipe support steel. All other equipment appears to have adequate clearance.
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 757           Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041
After further review with FRC, the valve was deemed to have adequate clearance.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI Ur-- N/A[
YN Nil UZl N/AZ-4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is. ery large (e..g., T.rbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described.
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fcet from the SWEL item.Page 428 of 451 Location:
Adequate sprinkler head clearance.Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No observed combustibles.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YS NEI U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No observed temporaryequipment or installations.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NE-1 U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
O-AHU-031-0045 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-9-2012 Page 427 of 451
 
Status: YE N[-] U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. AUX                   Floor El. 692             Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                             YN NEI Ur- N/Ar-I potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No observed missing, loose, or damaged hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?
Most visible anchorageis painted or galvanized. No observed degradationor corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                         YN Nil UZl N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Overhead conduit and piping is rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial               YN Nil UZl N/AZ-interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Observed FCV with 1" clearance to pipe support steel. All other equipment appearsto have adequate clearance.After further review with FRC, the valve was deemed to have adequate clearance.
4 If the   room   In which the SWEL item Is located is. ery large (e..g., T.rbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described.
This selected area should be based     on Judgment, e.g., on the order   of about 35 fcet from the SWEL   item.
Page 428 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 692           Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI UI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YED NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles/fuel source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NEI US- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No temporary equipment or scaffolding.
No temporary equipment or scaffolding.
YN NEI UI N/AZ YED NEI Ur- N/AZ YN NEI US- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YE NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-PMP-003-O00IA-S 1-TS-O01-0017A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 429 of 451 Status: YZ N[:] U[-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
General housekeeping is good.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.YED NEI ULI N/AEl 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NEI UE- N/AEl degraded conditions?
1-PMP-003-O00IA-S 1-TS-O01-0017A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-9-2012 Page 429 of 451
All anchorage is painted with minor chipping.
 
No observed corrosion.
Status: YZ N[:]           U[-]
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 782                 Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
No observed interaction concerns.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Adequate clearance maintained around transformers and panels.YN NEI UZ] N/AZ3 YE NZI UZ- N/AZ1 4 If the room In which the SWEL item i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be described.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                   YED NEI ULI N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
This selected area should be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 430 of 451 Location:
Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       Y0 NEI         UE- N/AEl degraded conditions?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Adequate sprinkler head clearance.
All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                               YN NEI UZ] N/AZ3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported. All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                     YE NZI UZ- N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearancemaintained around transformersand panels.
4 If the room   In which the SWEL   item i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine   HaiI), the area selected should   be described.
This selected     area should be based   on Judg   ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
Page 430 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 782           Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ NEI UI N/A[1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Adequate sprinkler head clearance. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI Ur1 N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YS NEI UI- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No observed temporary equipment or installations.
No observed temporary equipment or installations.
YZ NEI UI N/A[1 YS NEI Ur1 N/AZ YS NEI UI- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[E1 UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS N[E1 UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-OXF-068-0341A-A 0-OXF-068-0341F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 431 of 451 Status: Y ] NE U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Generalhousekeeping is good.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Adjacent Tank is anchored to concrete foundation.
O-OXF-068-0341A-A 0-OXF-068-0341F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           9-17-2012 Page 431 of 451
No observed missing, loose, or damaged anchors.YZ NE-] U[] N/AEZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/AZ degraded conditions?
 
Anchor assembly is painted. Some minor surface corrosion observed.(outside/wet environment)
Status: Y ] NE U-]
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?No HVAC or cable/conduit raceways.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
No spatial interaction concerns.YE] NEI UE] N/AZ YZ NEI UE] N/AZ-I 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area se ected should be described.
Location: Bldg. N/A                           Floor El. 729                 Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 f..t fro -the SWEL item.Page 432 of 451 Location:
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                           YZ NE-] U[] N/AEZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
YO- NEI U[-1 N/AN YE-] NE] UE- N/AN YN NE] UL- N/AZl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?YZ NEI U-1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Adjacent Tank is anchoredto concrete foundation. No observed missing, loose, or damaged anchors.
Construction of new tank. foundation in area. No observed concerns.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-TANK-063-0046 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 433 of 451 Status: YZ; ND- U[---]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                                 YE NE] UE] N/AZ degraded conditions?
Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Anchor assembly is painted. Some minor surface corrosionobserved.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
(outside/wetenvironment)
Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                       YE] NEI UE] N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
All anchorage is painted with minor chipping.
No HVAC or cable/conduitraceways.
No observed corrosion.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                             YZ NEI        UE] N/AZ-I interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No spatialinteractionconcerns.
No observed interaction concerns.
4 If the     room   in which the SWEL     item   Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area   se ected should   be described.
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment in area.YE NEI UI- N/AL]YED NEL UL] N/AEl YZ NEI UIZ N/AL-YED NEL UL-] N/AL]4 If he room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbi.e HaII), the area selected should be described.
This   selected     area   should be based     on judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 f..t   fro -the   SWEL   item.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fee from the SWEL item.Page 434 of 451 Location:
Page 432 of 451
Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045
 
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles.
Location: Bldg. N/A             Floor El. 729           Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YO- NEI  U[-1 N/AN interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Observed temporary scaffolding and shielding for the refueling outage activities.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YE-] NE] UE- N/AN interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No areas of concern.YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 YS NEl UI- N/AZ YS NEI U-1 N/A[-8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YN NE] UL- N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-TANK-068-PRT Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 435 of 451 Status: YE N[J UE]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could    YZ NEI U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Construction of new tank.foundation in area. No observed concerns.
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Rad monitors, fans and panels/racks all in good condition.
1-TANK-063-0046 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                            8-10-2012 Page 433 of 451
YZ NiZ UZ N/A[-]2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UL] N/A]degraded conditions?
 
Majority of anchorage is painted with minor chipping.
(AWC)                                                                    Status: YZ;    ND- U[---]
Some minor corrosion present on anchorage for AHUs, but not a concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and in good condition.
Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RB                          Floor El. 708                Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Overhead piping is rigidly supported as well.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YE NEI UI- N/AL]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                            YED NEL UL] N/AEl degraded conditions?
All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                    YZ NEI UIZ N/AL-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                          YED NEL UL-] N/AL]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearancemaintained aroundequipment in area.
4 If he room    in which  the SWEL    item  Is located is very large  (e.g., Turbi.e  HaII), the area selected should be described.
This selected    area   should be based      on judgment, e.g., on the    order  of about 35 fee from the SWEL item.
Page 434 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. RB              Floor El. 708          Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic      YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic      YS NEl UI- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic      YS NEI U-1 N/A[-
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Observed temporary scaffolding and shielding for the refueling outage activities. No areas of concern.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-TANK-068-PRT Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                              9-17-2012 Page 435 of 451
 
Status: YE N[J UE]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. CNTL                      Floor El. 755                Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                      YZ NiZ UZ N/A[-]
          -potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage. Rad monitors, fans and panels/racksall in good condition.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                          YE NEI UL] N/A]
degraded conditions?
Majority of anchorageis painted with minor chipping. Some minor corrosion present on anchoragefor AHUs, but not a concern.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                  YN NZI UZ] N/AZ]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and in good condition. Overhead piping is rigidly supported as well.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                        YE NEI UZ] N/AZ]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
No ceiling tiles. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
No ceiling tiles. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
YN NZI UZ] N/AZ]YE NEI UZ] N/AZ]4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.
4 If the   room In which   the SWEL     item is   located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the   area   selected should be described.
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 436 of 451 Location:
This selected     area   should be based   on judgment,   e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from     the SWEL item.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046
Page 436 of 451
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Observed sprinkler head in close proximity to HVAC duct insulation.
 
It does not appear to be touching.
Location: Bldg. CNTL           Floor El. 755           Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046
Insulation will allow for some movement/flexibility.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YZ NEI UrI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Piping and HVAC duct is supported nearby.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Observed sprinklerhead in close proximity to HVAC duct insulation. It does not appearto be touching. Insulation will allow for some movement/flexibility. Piping and HVAC duct is supported nearby.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YED NE-- UI1 N/AL) interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles/fuel source.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic     YS N--] U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
No temporary equipment or installations.
No temporary equipment or installations.
YZ NEI UrI N/AZ YED NE-- UI1 N/AL)YS N--] U-- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
General housekeeping is good/reasonable.
General housekeeping is good/reasonable.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-AHU-031-0012-A O-RE-090-0205-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 437 of 451 Status: NE] U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
O-AHU-031-0012-A O-RE-090-0205-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                               Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-10-2012 Page 437 of 451
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
 
No observed loose, missing or broken hardware.YZ NE-- UE- N/AZ 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
Status: Y[* NE] U--
No observed degradation other than minor/mild surface corrosion.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC duct rigidly supported.
Location: Bldg. AUX                     Floor El. 772                 Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Cable tray and conduit are rigidly supported.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YZ NE-- UE- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Adequate clearance maintained around equipment.
No observed loose, missing or broken hardware.
YZ NE-- U[-1 N/AZ YNZ NEI UE- N/AZl 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YO NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
This selected area should be based onjudgment.
No observed degradationother than minor/mild surface corrosion.
e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 438 of 451 Location:
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             YZ NE--        U[-1 N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047
HVAC duct rigidly supported. Cable tray and conduit are rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YNZ NEI UE- N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment.
Minor temporary scaffolding, but appears to have adequate clearance restraint.
4 If the room in   which the SWEL   item Is   located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should   be described.
YED NEI Ur- N/AZ YO NEI UI- N/A--YE NEI Ur- N/AZ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
This selected   area should be based   onjudgment.     e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
General housekeeping is good. Fire protection pipe (1-Y 2" dia.) within 1/2" of ACU-31-461.
Page 438 of 451
After review of WB-DC-20-32, potential spatial interaction was deemed to be credible, but not significant (not near threaded joint).The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-AHU-031-0461-A 1-COND-031-0290-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 439 of 451 Status: Y[ N[] U-'Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
 
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
Location: Bldg. AUX             Floor El. 772           Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YED NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
All visible anchorage appears to be free of loose, missing or broken hardware.
Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance.
Majority of panels are welded to embed plates.YS NEI UFI N/A[D 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YO NEI UI- N/A--
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles in the area.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic         YE NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Minor temporary scaffolding, but appearsto have adequate clearance restraint.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good. Fire protection pipe (1-Y2 " dia.) within 1/2" of ACU-31-461. After review of WB-DC-20-32, potential spatial interaction was deemed to be credible, but not significant (not near threadedjoint).
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-AHU-031-0461-A 1-COND-031-0290-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                   Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               8-13-2012 Page 439 of 451
 
Status: Y[     N[] U-'
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Location: Bldg. CNTL                     Floor El. 708               Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                 YS NEI UFI N/A[D potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All visible anchorageappearsto be free of loose, missing or broken hardware. Majority of panels are welded to embed plates.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                       YN NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?
All visible welds are painted and in good condition.
All visible welds are painted and in good condition.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appear overloaded.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                             YN NDI UD- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearoverloaded.
Ducting is also rigidly supported and in good condition.
Ducting is also rigidly supported and in good condition.
YN NDI UD- N/AZ 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                   YN NEI UD- N/ADl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Adequate clearance maintained between rows of panels. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
Adequate clearance maintained between rows of panels. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire.
YN NEI UD- N/ADl 4 If the oo .in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaII), the area selected should be described.
4 If the     oo
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 440 of 451 Location:
              . in which the SWEL     item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaII), the area selected should be described.
Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048
This   selected   area should be based   on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL   item.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flood source/concern.
Page 440 of 451
C02 fire suppression system.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles/fuel source in the area.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
 
Temporary scaffolding is present but appears to be restrained properly.YE NEI U-1 N/A[Z YS NEI U-1 N/AZl YZ N[: U-1 N/AZl 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Location: Bldg. CNTL           Floor El. 708           Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048
General housekeeping is good. Folding chairs and fan chained, but would not prevent items from falling. Does not appear that this is an adverse seismic condition.
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YE NEI U-1 N/A[Z interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Deemed work-in-progress.
No flood source/concern. C02 fire suppression system.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-PNL-275-R 127-A 1-PNL-275-R143-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 441 of 451 Status: YE NE uF1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YS NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
No observed combustibles/fuel source in the area.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YZ N[: U-1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.YZ NEI UL- N/AE-2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N[Z UI] N/A[-degraded conditions?
Temporary scaffolding is present but appears to be restrainedproperly.
All anchorage is painted or galvanized.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YED NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
No observed corrosion.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?All conduit and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
Generalhousekeeping is good. Folding chairs and fan chained, but would not prevent items from falling. Does not appearthat this is an adverse seismic condition. Deemed work-in-progress.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
Very congested area, but no observed interaction concerns.YN NEI UZ- N/AZ-YN NEI UZ-1 N/AZ 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described.
1-PNL-275-R 127-A 1-PNL-275-R143-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry                                                 Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon                                                           8-13-2012 Page 441 of 451
This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 442 of 451 Location:
 
Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049
Status: YE NE uF1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic.interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No observed combustibles.
Location: Bldg. RB                         Floor El. 716                 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
YO NEI UFZ N/AZl YO NEI U-1 N/AZl 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Some minor temporary scaffolding and ladders present in area.YN NEI U-- N/A-I 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable
General housekeeping is good.The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-ACUM-063-0003 1-FAN-030-0038-A Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 443 of 451 Appendix G: Peer Review Report Page 444 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.Structural  
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of                                         YZ NEI UL- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
& Seismic Engineering  
Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.
@ Risk Management NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 PEER REVIEW REPORT Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit I Near-Term Task Force 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns A peer review of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watts Bar Nuclear Plant -Unit 1 (WBN1)seismic walkdowns for Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.3: Seismic was performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 50.54 (f) letter (listed as Reference 2 in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report) and the guidance provided in Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report 1025286 (listed as Reference 3 in the Seismic Response Report).A highly interactive process was utilized by the peer review team. This involved ongoing open dialog consultation with project participants throughout training, equipment selection, equipment walkdowns, area walkbys, review of potentially adverse seismic conditions and corrective action program documentation, and final report preparation.
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant                             YZ N[Z UI] N/A[-
In summary, the peer review team is in full concurrence with the final results as documented in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, and we conclude that all of the project requirements have been met and adequately documented.
degraded conditions?
The following sections summarize the details of the peer review process for the major elements of the project.TRAINING The walkdown teams are described in Section 3 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report. All of the walkdown team members successfully completed the EPRI developed training on NTTF Recommendation 2.3 -Plant Seismic Walkdowns.
All anchorageis painted or galvanized. No observed corrosion.
All of the individual team members meet the qualification requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. In addition to this training, per our recommendations, all walkdown team members received additional training.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit                                     YN NEI UZ- N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
The purpose of the additional training was two-fold.
All conduit and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.
First, additional technical training was provided on equipment anchorage and seismic interaction evaluations, as an enhancement to the anchorage and interaction issues overview provided in the EPRI training course. Second, background information was provided on the site-specific seismic programs implemented by TVA at WBN1. This provided team members with historical background on the scope and findings of prior seismic reviews, as well as to deepened their understanding of the seismic licensing basis for WBN1.Examples of the additional plant-specific training material provided for the team members include the following:
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial                           YN NEI UZ-1 N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Very congested area, but no observed interactionconcerns.
4 If the room in   which the SWEL     item   is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the   area selected should be described.
This selected   area   should be based     on judgment,     e.g., on the order of about 35 feet   from   the SWEL   item.
Page 442 of 451
 
Location: Bldg. RB             Floor El. 716           Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049
: 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic.     YO NEI UFZ N/AZl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YO NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No observed combustibles.
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic       YN NEI U-- N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Some minor temporary scaffolding and ladders present in area.
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YN NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Generalhousekeeping is good.
The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:
1-ACUM-063-0003 1-FAN-030-0038-A Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV                                                 Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon                                                               9-17-2012 Page 443 of 451
 
Appendix G: Peer Review Report Page 444 of 451
 
FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS,                                                       INC.
Structural& Seismic Engineering @Risk Management NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 PEER REVIEW REPORT Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit I Near-Term Task Force 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns A peer review of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 (WBN1) seismic walkdowns for Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.3: Seismic was performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 50.54 (f) letter (listed as Reference 2 in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report) and the guidance provided in Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report 1025286 (listed as Reference 3 in the Seismic Response Report).
A highly interactive process was utilized by the peer review team. This involved ongoing open dialog consultation with project participants throughout training, equipment selection, equipment walkdowns, area walkbys, review of potentially adverse seismic conditions and corrective action program documentation, and final report preparation.
In summary, the peer review team is in full concurrence with the final results as documented in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, and we conclude that all of the project requirements have been met and adequately documented. The following sections summarize the details of the peer review process for the major elements of the project.
TRAINING The walkdown teams are described in Section 3 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report. All of the walkdown team members successfully completed the EPRI developed training on NTTF Recommendation 2.3 - Plant Seismic Walkdowns. All of the individual team members meet the qualification requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. In addition to this training, per our recommendations, all walkdown team members received additional training. The purpose of the additional training was two-fold. First, additional technical training was provided on equipment anchorage and seismic interaction evaluations, as an enhancement to the anchorage and interaction issues overview provided in the EPRI training course. Second, background information was provided on the site-specific seismic programs implemented by TVA at WBN1. This provided team members with historical background on the scope and findings of prior seismic reviews, as well as to deepened their understanding of the seismic licensing basis for WBN1.
Examples of the additional plant-specific training material provided for the team members include the following:
* Description of WBN1 seismic design basis including application of Set B and B+C seismic design response spectra for evaluation of existing plant features and new seismic design activity, respectively.
* Description of WBN1 seismic design basis including application of Set B and B+C seismic design response spectra for evaluation of existing plant features and new seismic design activity, respectively.
* Overview of WBN1 seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components and discussion of how to locate calculation packages documenting acceptance.
* Overview of WBN1 seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components and discussion of how to locate calculation packages documenting acceptance.
FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.
* 6275 University Dr., Ste. 37 e Huntsville, AL 35806-1776 e Tel: 256-679-3234 www.facilityrisk.com Page 445 of 451 NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 2 of 7* Nuclear Performance Plan and Civil/Seismic Corrective Action Plans (CAPs)implemented prior to WBN1 start-up.
* 6275 University Dr., Ste. 37 e Huntsville, AL 35806-1776 e Tel: 256-679-3234 www.facilityrisk.com Page 445 of 451
This included a summary of the following major programs:-Seismic Analysis Program-Hanger Analysis and Update Program (HAAUP)-Equipment Seismic Qualification (ESQ)-Structural Steel Attachment loads, Thermal Effects, SCV Movements-Seismic Verification of Conduit, Cable Trays, HVAC Ducting, & Supports-Concrete/Masonry Wall /Embedded Plates Issues* Integrated Interaction Program (liP)--Verification of non-safety-related Seismic Category I(L) plant features, equipment items, conduit, and HVAC duct-Seismic verification of Seismic category I(L) piping under the Il/I spray program-Suspended systems proximity clearance verifications
 
-Safety-related equipment seismic proximity reviews-Verification of Shakespace crossings-SCV proximity review-Commodity clearance procedures in place (MAI 2.3)* Seismic Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE)-Review Level Earthquake (RLE) for seismic IPEEE implementation at WBN1-Scope of review and Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL)-Summary of WBN1 seismic IPEEE walkdown results-Presentation of results and governing High Confidence Low Probability of Failure (HCLPF) capacities (minimum of 0.36g)-Ongoing enhanced seismic IPEEE efforts to increase plant HCLPF capacity SELECTION OF ITEMS ON THE SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST (SWEL)The completed SWEL as described in Section 4 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report is in full compliance with the guidelines in EPRI Report 1025286.The SWEL 1 represents a diverse sample of selected equipment and support systems required to perform the five safety functions of reactor reactivity control, reactor coolant pressure control, reactor coolant inventory control, decay heat removal, and containment function.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 2 of 7
The SWEL 1 includes, as appropriate, various types of systems, classes of equipment, and equipment environments.
* Nuclear Performance Plan and Civil/Seismic Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) implemented prior to WBN1 start-up. This included a summary of the following major programs:
The SWEL 1 includes new and replacement equipment.
            - Seismic Analysis Program
The WBN1 IPEEE review was performed using the EPRI margins methodology and that success path based SSEL was used as a starting point for SWEL 1. No seismic PRA has been performed for WBN1 so no information regarding dominant contributors to seismic risk was available.
            - Hanger Analysis and Update Program (HAAUP)
SWEL 1 was compared to the Core Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted.The SWEL 2 represents selected equipment related to the spent fuel pool system, including those that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of the fuel assemblies.
            - Equipment Seismic Qualification (ESQ)
There was considerable interaction between the peer review team, the walkdown team, and the equipment selection team during the course of the evaluation.
            - Structural Steel Attachment loads, Thermal Effects, SCV Movements
The final SWEL, as documented in Section 4 and in Appendix D of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, is a culmination of this Page 446 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
            - Seismic Verification of Conduit, Cable Trays, HVAC Ducting, & Supports
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 3 of 7 interaction.
            - Concrete/Masonry Wall /Embedded Plates Issues
Examples of peer review comments that were adequately addressed and resolved during the SWEL development process include the following:
* Integrated Interaction Program (liP)
            - -Verification of non-safety-related Seismic Category I(L) plant features, equipment items, conduit, and HVAC duct
            - Seismic verification of Seismic category I(L) piping under the Il/I spray program
            - Suspended systems proximity clearance verifications
            - Safety-related equipment seismic proximity reviews
            - Verification of Shakespace crossings
            - SCV proximity review
            - Commodity clearance procedures in place (MAI 2.3)
* Seismic Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE)
            - Review Level Earthquake (RLE) for seismic IPEEE implementation at WBN1
            - Scope of review and Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL)
            - Summary of WBN1 seismic IPEEE walkdown results
            - Presentation of results and governing High Confidence Low Probability of Failure (HCLPF) capacities (minimum of 0.36g)
            - Ongoing enhanced seismic IPEEE efforts to increase plant HCLPF capacity SELECTION OF ITEMS ON THE SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST (SWEL)
The completed SWEL as described in Section 4 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report is in full compliance with the guidelines in EPRI Report 1025286.
The SWEL 1 represents a diverse sample of selected equipment and support systems required to perform the five safety functions of reactor reactivity control, reactor coolant pressure control, reactor coolant inventory control, decay heat removal, and containment function. The SWEL 1 includes, as appropriate, various types of systems, classes of equipment, and equipment environments. The SWEL 1 includes new and replacement equipment.
The WBN1 IPEEE review was performed using the EPRI margins methodology and that success path based SSEL was used as a starting point for SWEL 1. No seismic PRA has been performed for WBN1 so no information regarding dominant contributors to seismic risk was available. SWEL 1 was compared to the Core Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted.
The SWEL 2 represents selected equipment related to the spent fuel pool system, including those that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of the fuel assemblies.
There was considerable interaction between the peer review team, the walkdown team, and the equipment selection team during the course of the evaluation. The final SWEL, as documented in Section 4 and in Appendix D of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, is a culmination of this Page 446 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
 
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 3 of 7 interaction. Examples of peer review comments that were adequately addressed and resolved during the SWEL development process include the following:
* In the preliminary SWEL, the safety functions were not listed for each item of equipment.
* In the preliminary SWEL, the safety functions were not listed for each item of equipment.
This made it very difficult to ensure that all five safety functions were adequately represented.
This made it very difficult to ensure that all five safety functions were adequately represented. The team updated the list to clearly include the respective safety functions.
The team updated the list to clearly include the respective safety functions.
* Based on review of the update list from the above comment, it was discovered that the reactor pressure control safety function was not adequately represented on the preliminary SWEL. It was recommended that the team add additional equipment items representative of the reactor coolant pressure control safety function. Items were added as indicated in the final SWEL
* Based on review of the update list from the above comment, it was discovered that the reactor pressure control safety function was not adequately represented on the preliminary SWEL. It was recommended that the team add additional equipment items representative of the reactor coolant pressure control safety function.
* In order to include representative equipment items for all of the 21 classes of equipment listed in Table B-1 of the EPRI Report 1025286, items of equipment were added to the SWEL that were not part of the IPEEE review. It was noted that this was unnecessary yet conservative, so the items remained on the SWEL.
Items were added as indicated in the final SWEL* In order to include representative equipment items for all of the 21 classes of equipment listed in Table B-1 of the EPRI Report 1025286, items of equipment were added to the SWEL that were not part of the IPEEE review. It was noted that this was unnecessary yet conservative, so the items remained on the SWEL.* In the preliminary SWEL there was confusion regarding the equipment class definition of distribution panels, and low and medium voltage switchgears.
* In the preliminary SWEL there was confusion regarding the equipment class definition of distribution panels, and low and medium voltage switchgears. This is corrected in the final SWEL, such that the 120V vital instrument power board is in the distribution panel equipment class, and the 480V shutdown boards are in the low voltage equipment class.
This is corrected in the final SWEL, such that the 120V vital instrument power board is in the distribution panel equipment class, and the 480V shutdown boards are in the low voltage equipment class.* It is noted that the final SWEL adequately includes equipment in each major building structure and encompasses mild to more severe environments.
* It is noted that the final SWEL adequately includes equipment in each major building structure and encompasses mild to more severe environments.
* It is noted that there were no outliers in the WBN1 seismic IPEEE review, so there were no items of equipment that had to be added to the SWEL for confirmation of seismic IPEEE upgrades.SEISMIC EQUIPMENT WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALKBYS The peer review team spent considerable time interfacing with the walkdown team members during the WBN1 seismic equipment walkdowns and area walkbys. This included responding to questions regarding the scope and content of the reviews. This also included in-plant observations of the teams during the reviews as well as independent in-plant reviews of individual equipment components.
* It is noted that there were no outliers in the WBN1 seismic IPEEE review, so there were no items of equipment that had to be added to the SWEL for confirmation of seismic IPEEE upgrades.
Walkdown observations and results were reviewed and discussed on a weekly basis with the walkdown team members. Particular emphasis was given to any items preliminarily identified as potential adverse seismic conditions (see discussion in the next section).
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALKBYS The peer review team spent considerable time interfacing with the walkdown team members during the WBN1 seismic equipment walkdowns and area walkbys. This included responding to questions regarding the scope and content of the reviews. This also included in-plant observations of the teams during the reviews as well as independent in-plant reviews of individual equipment components. Walkdown observations and results were reviewed and discussed on a weekly basis with the walkdown team members. Particular emphasis was given to any items preliminarily identified as potential adverse seismic conditions (see discussion in the next section). In the end, the peer review addressed over 50% of the completed walkdown documentation forms.
In the end, the peer review addressed over 50% of the completed walkdown documentation forms.It is noted that the in-plant activity and over 50% documentation review is above and beyond the peer review requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. As a result of this effort, we are highly confident that the teams conducted the reviews in a thorough and competent manner, and that the reviews are fully in compliance with the intent of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter.Examples of seismic issues discussed and resolved during the course of the peer review process for the WBN1 equipment seismic walkdowns and area walkbys include the following:
It is noted that the in-plant activity and over 50% documentation review is above and beyond the peer review requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. As a result of this effort, we are highly confident that the teams conducted the reviews in a thorough and competent manner, and that the reviews are fully in compliance with the intent of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter.
* On the RHR Pump Room Cooler 11B-B, it was confirmed that the anchorage had only minor surface rust that would not significantly impact capacity.
Examples of seismic issues discussed and resolved during the course of the peer review process for the WBN1 equipment seismic walkdowns and area walkbys include the following:
Also, it was concluded that proximity interaction with a nearby small bore pipe was credible but not significant.
* On the RHR Pump Room Cooler 11B-B, it was confirmed that the anchorage had only minor surface rust that would not significantly impact capacity. Also, it was concluded that proximity interaction with a nearby small bore pipe was credible but not significant.
Page 447 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
Page 447 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 4 of 7* On the ERCW Strainer 1A-1, minor surface rust was judged to be acceptable, and proximity interaction due to vertical contact with a scaffolding pole was determined to not be significant due to massive size of strainer.* On the ERCW Pump A-A, the walkdown team observed that overhead scaffolding was in close proximity to a level indicator, but it was determined that the scaffolding is rigidly restrained and that the impact was not credible.
 
Also, close proximity of an electrical conduit and a pre-lube throttle was deemed to be credible, but not significant, so accepted as-is.* A civil/structural feature was observed to be in close proximity (3/4" to 1") to 1-FCV-062-0093. Based on closer review, the clearance was found to be sufficient and the interaction was not credible.* Minor cracking of concrete was observed by the walkdown team at DG 1A-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A anchor bolts. The cracking in proximity to the anchors was determined to be less than 0.5mm and judged to not be a seismic concern." The corrosion noted by the walkdown on anchor bolts for the 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU 1A-A was determined to be only minor surface rust and accepted.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 4 of 7
In addition, the close proximity of a cable tray support member to the AHU was determined to have sufficient clearance and was determined to be non-credible.
* On the ERCW Strainer 1A-1, minor surface rust was judged to be acceptable, and proximity interaction due to vertical contact with a scaffolding pole was determined to not be significant due to massive size of strainer.
* The walkdown team observed a potential seismic interaction flexibility concern at Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B. A 2" pipe penetrating the permanent hood continued to a rigid attachment to a 1" pipe. The screening tools in WB-DC-20-32 were implemented and the flexibility was determined to be adequate.* Scaffolding was observed by the walkdown team to be in close proximity to the 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1. Based upon further review, the 3/4" clearance was determined to be sufficient to preclude the interaction.
* On the ERCW Pump A-A, the walkdown team observed that overhead scaffolding was in close proximity to a level indicator, but it was determined that the scaffolding is rigidly restrained and that the impact was not credible. Also, close proximity of an electrical conduit and a pre-lube throttle was deemed to be credible, but not significant, so accepted as-is.
* On the 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S, the walkdown team observed that two conduit interfaces had hard connections and questioned whether flex conduit should have been used. After further consideration including implementation of screening tools from WB-DC-20-32, the configuration was determined to be acceptable." Minor hairline cracking at the grounding bus connection bolt for 125V Diesel Generator Battery 1 B-B was identified by the walkdown team. No significant cracks were in the vicinity of the anchors and the condition was determined to not be a potential adverse seismic condition." Temperature sensors lacking a safety cable were identified by the walkdown teams for several items of equipment.
* A civil/structural feature was observed to be in close proximity (3/4" to 1") to 1-FCV-062-0093. Based on closer review, the clearance was found to be sufficient and the interaction was not credible.
After more detailed assessment utilizing Seismic Category I(L) screening criteria of WB-DC-20-32 and WCG-2-409, these were determined to not represent a failing and falling concern.* During the walk-by of area A851 WBN-WB-030, a cable tray support end cap was found to be in close proximity to a conduit exiting MCC-213-A2.
* Minor cracking of concrete was observed by the walkdown team at DG 1A-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A anchor bolts. The cracking in proximity to the anchors was determined to be less than 0.5mm and judged to not be a seismic concern.
Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.* During the walkby of area A306 WBN-WB-042, 1" clearance was observed between a flow control valve and adjacent pipe support steel. Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.Page 448 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
" The corrosion noted by the walkdown on anchor bolts for the 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU 1A-A was determined to be only minor surface rust and accepted. In addition, the close proximity of a cable tray support member to the AHU was determined to have sufficient clearance and was determined to be non-credible.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 5 of 7 In the end, the peer review team is in concurrence with the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs) and Area Walkby Checklists (AWCs) as presented in Appendices E and F, respectively, of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report.POTENTIAL ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS The peer review team spent considerable time with the walkdown teams addressing preliminary potential adverse seismic conditions identified during walkdowns.
* The walkdown team observed a potential seismic interaction flexibility concern at Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B. A 2" pipe penetrating the permanent hood continued to a rigid attachment to a 1" pipe. The screening tools in WB-DC-20-32 were implemented and the flexibility was determined to be adequate.
It is noted that there were very many questions early in the walkdown review process on the conservative side of issues, and these kinds of questions diminished towards the end of the project as the judgment of the teams significantly improved.
* Scaffolding was observed by the walkdown team to be in close proximity to the 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1. Based upon further review, the 3/4" clearance was determined to be sufficient to preclude the interaction.
Most of these early concerns were in regards to potential seismic interaction effects. In most cases, these issues were resolved by review of prior evaluations or the TVA procedures and guidance already in place at the plant.All potential adverse seismic conditions were reviewed in detail, including working with the teams to address seismic licensing basis and operability issues for the confirmed potential adverse seismic conditions that resulted in the initiation of Problem Evaluation Reports (PERs)as part of the Corrective Action Program (CAP). In the end, the peer review team is in full concurrence with all of the potential adverse seismic conditions summarized in Section 6.2 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report.Comments regarding the individual potential adverse seismic conditions for WBN1 include the following:
* On the 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S, the walkdown team observed that two conduit interfaces had hard connections and questioned whether flex conduit should have been used. After further consideration including implementation of screening tools from WB-DC-20-32, the configuration was determined to be acceptable.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1 addresses a U-bolt connection that was not tight on the Diesel Generator Engine 1A1 Start Air Receiver A. In our opinion the loose connection still provides an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 addresses a similar issue noted during the walkby for Diesel Generator Room D104, where an air receiver tank is not properly aligned. We judged that that the existing configuration still provided an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 addresses missing and damaged bolts connecting adjacent Diesel Generator system I&C panels. Although the present bolts were determined to be adequate to hold the adjacent panels together, the walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 addresses a temporary scaffold near ERCW Pump 0-PMP-67-32 (area walkby) as a seismic interaction concern. The pump was determined to be sufficiently rugged that the potential interaction was not significant.
" Minor hairline cracking at the grounding bus connection bolt for 125V Diesel Generator Battery 1B-B was identified by the walkdown team. No significant cracks were in the vicinity of the anchors and the condition was determined to not be a potential adverse seismic condition.
The walkdown team noted the non-conforming scaffold as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 addresses a cable tray support cap plate in contact with a conduit collar on 1-MCC-232-B-B.
" Temperature sensors lacking a safety cable were identified by the walkdown teams for several items of equipment. After more detailed assessment utilizing Seismic Category I(L) screening criteria of WB-DC-20-32 and WCG-2-409, these were determined to not represent a failing and falling concern.
Detailed inspections ascertained that the adjacent MCC cubicles falling within a vertical 45 degree line of the impact location Page 449 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
* During the walk-by of area A851 WBN-WB-030, a cable tray support end cap was found to be in close proximity to a conduit exiting MCC-213-A2. Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 6 of 7 were free of safety-related plant features.
* During the walkby of area A306 WBN-WB-042, 1" clearance was observed between a flow control valve and adjacent pipe support steel. Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.
The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 addresses a fire protection sprinkler head in contact with a conduit in the 480V Board Room 1A (area walkby). This represents a potential water spray hazard for equipment in the area. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP. The PER review by plant operations concluded that it did not affect plant safety, and a non-essential priority work order was forwarded to plant fire protection for later resolution.
Page 448 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
 
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 5 of 7 In the end, the peer review team is in concurrence with the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs) and Area Walkby Checklists (AWCs) as presented in Appendices E and F, respectively, of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report.
POTENTIAL ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS The peer review team spent considerable time with the walkdown teams addressing preliminary potential adverse seismic conditions identified during walkdowns. It is noted that there were very many questions early in the walkdown review process on the conservative side of issues, and these kinds of questions diminished towards the end of the project as the judgment of the teams significantly improved. Most of these early concerns were in regards to potential seismic interaction effects. In most cases, these issues were resolved by review of prior evaluations or the TVA procedures and guidance already in place at the plant.
All potential adverse seismic conditions were reviewed in detail, including working with the teams to address seismic licensing basis and operability issues for the confirmed potential adverse seismic conditions that resulted in the initiation of Problem Evaluation Reports (PERs) as part of the Corrective Action Program (CAP). In the end, the peer review team is in full concurrence with all of the potential adverse seismic conditions summarized in Section 6.2 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report.
Comments regarding the individual potential adverse seismic conditions for WBN1 include the following:
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1 addresses a U-bolt connection that was not tight on the Diesel Generator Engine 1A1 Start Air Receiver A. In our opinion the loose connection still provides an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 addresses a similar issue noted during the walkby for Diesel Generator Room D104, where an air receiver tank is not properly aligned. We judged that that the existing configuration still provided an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 addresses missing and damaged bolts connecting adjacent Diesel Generator system I&C panels. Although the present bolts were determined to be adequate to hold the adjacent panels together, the walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 addresses a temporary scaffold near ERCW Pump 0-PMP-67-32 (area walkby) as a seismic interaction concern. The pump was determined to be sufficiently rugged that the potential interaction was not significant.
The walkdown team noted the non-conforming scaffold as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 addresses a cable tray support cap plate in contact with a conduit collar on 1-MCC-232-B-B. Detailed inspections ascertained that the adjacent MCC cubicles falling within a vertical 45 degree line of the impact location Page 449 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
 
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 6 of 7 were free of safety-related plant features. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 addresses a fire protection sprinkler head in contact with a conduit in the 480V Board Room 1A (area walkby). This represents a potential water spray hazard for equipment in the area. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP. The PER review by plant operations concluded that it did not affect plant safety, and a non-essential priority work order was forwarded to plant fire protection for later resolution.
The basis for the disposition of the PER was not clear. Based on our recommendations, another CAP entry was initiated to enable a more thorough review of the configuration.
The basis for the disposition of the PER was not clear. Based on our recommendations, another CAP entry was initiated to enable a more thorough review of the configuration.
This corrective action is currently in process.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 addresses an unrestrained copy machine in the vicinity of a control room panel. It is our judgment that the seismic accelerations and configuration geometry preclude overturning, and operations concluded that the potential impact condition to the panel did not adversely impact the functionality of the affected equipment.
This corrective action is currently in process.
The walkdown team noted the non-conforming copy machine as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 addresses a sheared off anchor bolt on 480V Board Room Condenser B-B (from the area walkby). The remaining bolts were judged to possess sufficient capacity for adequate anchorage of the component.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 addresses an unrestrained copy machine in the vicinity of a control room panel. It is our judgment that the seismic accelerations and configuration geometry preclude overturning, and operations concluded that the potential impact condition to the panel did not adversely impact the functionality of the affected equipment. The walkdown team noted the non-conforming copy machine as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A. There is evidence of some material reduction.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 addresses a sheared off anchor bolt on 480V Board Room Condenser B-B (from the area walkby). The remaining bolts were judged to possess sufficient capacity for adequate anchorage of the component. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP." Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B. There is evidence of some material reduction.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A. There is evidence of some material reduction. The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11 addresses anchor spacing not in compliance with design output documentation for 120V AC Vital Inverters 0-1 and 1-111. The anchorage is robust and meets design basis seismic requirements by inspection, but is outside of the dimension tolerance on the drawings.
    " Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B. There is evidence of some material reduction. The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.SUBMITTAL REPORT The peer review team has reviewed the WBN1 submittal report in detail and we are in full concurrence with the documented observations and findings.
* Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11 addresses anchor spacing not in compliance with design output documentation for 120V AC Vital Inverters 0-1 and 1-111. The anchorage is robust and meets design basis seismic requirements by inspection, but is outside of the dimension tolerance on the drawings. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
The report is in compliance with the guidance in EPRI Report 1025286 and meets the requirements and objectives of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter.Page 450 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
SUBMITTAL REPORT The peer review team has reviewed the WBN1 submittal report in detail and we are in full concurrence with the documented observations and findings. The report is in compliance with the guidance in EPRI Report 1025286 and meets the requirements and objectives of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter.
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 7 of 7 In our opinion, the potential adverse seismic conditions identified by the program are in general only minor issues, and this is a reflection of the adequate seismic design criteria as well as the seismic-related construction and maintenance procedures that TVA has in place at WBN1.Further evaluation is ongoing for Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 as noted above.Sincerely, Stephen J. Eder, P.E.Lead Peer Reviewer i1onU John 0. Dizon, P.E.Peer Reviewer Page 451 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.}}
Page 450 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.
 
NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 7 of 7 In our opinion, the potential adverse seismic conditions identified by the program are in general only minor issues, and this is a reflection of the adequate seismic design criteria as well as the seismic-related construction and maintenance procedures that TVA has in place at WBN1.
Further evaluation is ongoing for Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 as noted above.
Sincerely, i1onU Stephen J. Eder, P.E.                                         John 0. Dizon, P.E.
Lead Peer Reviewer                                            Peer Reviewer Page 451 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.}}

Revision as of 18:44, 11 November 2019

Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report
ML12353A251
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/2012
From: Edgar J, Matthew Gordon, York P
Tennessee Valley Authority, WorleyParsons Ltd
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML12353A251 (454)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT I FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 1 FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT 12-November 2012 WorleyParsons 633 Chestnut St. Suite 400 Chattanooga TN, 37450 Tel: 423-757-8020 Fax: 423-757-5869 www.worleyparsons.com WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd ABN 61 001 279 812 © Copyright 2012 WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit I REV DESCRIPTION ORIO REVIEW WORLEY- DATE CLIENT DATE PARSONS APPROVAL APPROVAL j./ 0 WBN Unit 1 Seismic f l 124,ov-12 /=o,/".- Walkdown Report P.Yxrk M Gordon AJ. Edgar Page 2 of 451

hNTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Table of Contents

1. Executive Sum mary .................................................................................................................. 4
2. Seism ic Licensing Basis .................................................................................................... 5 2.1. General Plant Description ............................................................................................ 5 2.2. Ground Response Spectra ............................................................................................. 5 2.3. Structures ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.4. Equipm ent ........................................................................................................................ 11
3. Personnel Q ualifications ...................................................................................................... 12 3.1. Equipm ent Selection Personnel .................................................................................... 12 3.2. Seism ic Walkdown Engineers ...................................................................................... 12 3.3. Licensing Basis Reviewers ........................................................................................... 12 3.4. IPEEE Reviewers ............................................................................................................. 12 3.5. Peer Review Team ...................................................................................................... 13
4. Selection of Structures, System s and Com ponents ............................................................ 14 4.1. SW EL Selection ............................................................................................................... 14 4.2. SW EL Analysis ................................................................................................................. 15
5. Seism ic Walkdowns and Area W alk-Bys ........................................................................... 16 5.1. Seism ic Walkdown Procedure ...................................................................................... 16 5.2. SW C & AW C Sum m ary ............................................................................................... 17
6. Licensing Basis Evaluations ............................................................................................... 18 6.1. Licensing Basis Calculations ......................................................................................... 18 6.2. Potential Seism ically Adverse Conditions ...... ............................ 18
7. IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report ........................................................................... 21 7.1. IPEEE Description ............................................................................................................. 21 7.2. IPEEE Findings and Vulnerabilities ............................................................................. 21
8. Peer Review ............................................................................................................................ 23
9. References .............................................................................................................................. 24
10. Appendices ........................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix A: Resum es ............................................................................................................. 26 Appendix B: Base List I ..................................................................................................... 54 Appendix C: Base List 2 ...................................................................................................... 94 Appendix D: SW ELs and Area List .................................................................................... 98 Appendix E: SW Cs ................................................................................................................ 104 Appendix F: AW Cs ................................................................................................................ 345 Appendix G : Peer Review Report ......................................................................................... 444 Page 3 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

1. Executive Summary As a result of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) required all US nuclear power plants to perform seismic walkdowns to identify and address degraded, non-conforming or unanalyzed conditions and to verify the current plant configuration with the current seismic licensing basis.

The NRC Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) issued a report (Reference 1) that made a series of recommendations. Subsequently, the NRC issued a 50.54(f) Letter (Reference 2) that requests information to assure that these recommendations are addressed by all U.S. nuclear power plants. This report provides guidance for conducting a seismic walkdown as required in the 50.54(f) Letter, Enclosure 3, Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. In support of conducting the NTTF-2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) issued a report entitled Seismic Walkdown Guidance (Reference 3) to provide instruction for uniform seismic walkdowns of all U.S. nuclear power plants. This document also includes guidance for reporting the findings of the required walkdowns. At Unit 1 of the Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, a total of 120 general Seismic Category I equipment items were selected from the original IPEEE Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) to fulfill the requirements of the NTTF-2.3 Seismic Walkdowns. The selected items were located in various environments and included many different types of equipment from multiple safety shutdown systems. A total of 49 areas were included for area walk-bys. The equipment walkdowns and area walk-bys were performed by two teams, each consisting of two seismic engineers and operations personnel, between July 16, 2012 and August 15, 2012. All 120 equipment items in the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) were completed during the walkdown phase. Eleven potential adverse seismic conditions were found and addressed through the TVA Corrective Action Program. Page 4 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

2. Seismic Licensing Basis The seismic licensing basis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant is derived from Reference 4 - Watts Bar Nuclear PlantLiving Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment 9.

2.1. General Plant Description The Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant site is located on a tract of approximately 1770 acres in Rhea County on the west bank of the Tennessee River at river mile 528. The site is approximately 1-1/4 miles south of the Watts Bar Dam and approximately 31 miles north-northeast of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant. The 1770 acre reservation is owned by the United States and is in the custody of TVA. Also located within the reservation are the Watts Bar Dam and Hydro-Electric Plant, the Watts Bar Steam Plant, the TVA Central Maintenance Facility, and the Watts Bar Resort Area. The plant is designed, built, and operated by TVA. The unit employs a four-loop Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) furnished by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The unit is similar to those of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and other similar Westinghouse plants licensed by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant was designed to meet the intent of the "Proposed General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Construction Permits" published in July, 1967. The Watts Bar construction permit was issued in January, '1973. This UFSAR, however, addresses the NRC General Design Criteria (GDC) published as Appendix A to 10 CFR 50 in July, 1971, including Criterion 4 as amended October 27, 1987. 2.2. Ground Response Spectra The Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant is located in the Southern Appalachian Tectonic Province. The Giles County, Virginia, earthquake of 1897, rated as an MMVIII, was assumed to occur at the site for purposes of defining the SSE. Vibratory ground motions are defined by two sets of site seismic design response spectra: the Modified Newmark Ground Response Spectra or Original Site Design Response Spectra for Set A and Set C analyses and the Site Specific Ground Response Spectra for Set B analyses. Set B in-structure response spectra were developed using updated seismic analysis building models and the site-specific ground response spectra. The Set B in-structure response spectra are used for verification of existing plant features. Set C in-structure response spectra were developed using the original Set A ground response spectra and the updated seismic analysis building models that were developed for Set B. The envelope of Set B and Set C in-structure response spectra are termed set B+C, and these are used for design of new plant features and modification of existing plant features. Page 5 of 451

hNTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 2.2.1. Original Site Ground Response Spectra (Set A & Set C) The original site seismic design response spectra which define the vibratory ground motion of the Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) and the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) for rock supported structures are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The maximum rock acceleration for the SSE is 0.18g for horizontal motion and 0.12g for vertical motion. The OBE is equal to one-half the SSE, with maximum horizontal and vertical rock accelerations of 0.09g and 0.06g, respectively. Figure 1 - OBE Response Spectrum for Rock Support Structures Page 6 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Figure 2 - SSE Response Spectrum for Rock Support Structures Page 7 of 451

~i* NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 2.2.2. Site Specific Ground Response Spectra (Set B) Seismic input motions for the evaluation of existing structures, systems, and components are defined by the top-of-rock SSRS shown in Figures 3 through 5. Peak SSE and OBE top-of-rock accelerations are 0.215g (horizontal SSE), 0.15g (vertical SSE), 0.09g (horizontal OBE), and 0.06g (vertical OBE). to I . I I .U . . l 1 .I-I i 

                              -     TI ME HISTORY RESPONSE SPECTRUM                       TVA WATTS BAR:
                             ..... SITE SPECIFIC RERPONSE 5PECTRUM                       HORIZONTAL M1.

7 5 DAMiPING Z LUJ 

               -j LU U

U Lai CL In I . I . 81 . f is" is I -. A AI I1 Is lot IJ. FREQUENCY (cps) Figure 3 - N-S SSE Response Spectrum at 5% Damping Page 8 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 SIT! SPECIFIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM HORIZONTAL Hl"4' 59 CAAPZNF LU 

 -3 LU Uj 0-1 cc LA, M,

I a~ n.Init & . a . . .. to 11,t I@ a FREQUENCY (cps) Figure 4 - E-W SSE Response Spectrum at 5% Damping 

                  -TIMI    HJ'iST 'ry RESPýO*Si SPECTRUNTLAWATSS   A MATTS, W IT! SPECIFIC~ RESPONIS.... SPECTRUM      ~ PTICAL JCL 69Ot PN z

LU 

.i Li U

Lie CLf a f1. I ai I I tigoal I .. B E K N R ISO it, I lot isII Ia FREQUENCY (cps) Figure 5 - Vertical SSE Response Spectrum at 5% Damping Page 9 of 451

rNTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 2.3. Structures The design of all Class I structures and facilities conformed to the applicable general codes or specifications including: 

  " American Concrete Institute (ACl) o ACI 214-77 Recommended Practice for Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete o ACI 318-71 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete o ACI 359 Code for Concrete Containments, (Proposed ACI-ASME Code ACI-359 (Article CC-3000) As issued for trial use April, 1973) o ACI 347-68 Recommended Practice for Concrete Formwork o ACI 305-72 Recommended Practice for Hot Weather Concreting o ACI 211.1-70 Recommended Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal Weight Concrete o ACI 307-69 Specification For the Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Chimneys
   " American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) o "Specification for the Design, Fabrication, and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings," February 12, 1969
  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) o 1975 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Specific standards are identified in Section 3.8.1.6.
  • American Welding Society (AWS):

o Structural Welding Code, AWS D1.1-72 with Revisions 1-73 and 2-74 except later editions may be used for prequalified joint details, base materials, and qualification of welding procedures and welders. o "Recommended Practice for Welding Reinforcing Steel, Metal Inserts, and Connections in Reinforced Concrete Connections," AWS D12.1-61.

  • NRC Regulatory Guides:

o RG 1.10 Mechanical (Cadweld) Splices in Reinforcing Bars of Category I Concrete Structures o RG 1.12 Instrumentation for Earthquakes o RG 1.15 Testing of Reinforcing Bars for Category I Concrete Structures o RG 1.31 Control of Ferrite Content in Stainless Steel Weld Metal o RG 1.55 Concrete Placement in Category I Structures. Page 10 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 2.4. Equipment NSSS components and equipment supplied by Westinghouse have been qualified in accordance with the applicable seismic qualification requirements. Seismic qualification requirements for Seismic Category I systems and components are consistent with IEEE Standard 344-1975/Regulatory Guide 1.100 for equipment procured after September 1, 1974, or in accordance with a program which provides as a minimum, qualification to the requirements of IEEE 344-1971 and in addition addresses the guidelines of SRP 3.10. Class I equipment and safety related piping were designed such that stress and deformation behavior were maintained within the allowable limits when subjected to normal operating conditions combined with the seismic effects resulting from the response to the OBE. In addition, the stresses that resulted from normal loads combined with the response to the SSE were limited so that no loss of function occurred, and the capability of making a safe and orderly plant shutdown was maintained. These allowable limits are defined in appropriate design standards including: 

   " American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel, Sec. III Class 1,2, and 3 Codes for Nuclear Power Plants, 1971 thru Summer 1973 Addenda
   " American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Sec. VIII Div. 1.
  • American Nuclear Society/American National Standards Institute (ANS/ANSI) N 18.2, Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants. August 1970 Draft.
   " American National Standards Institute (ANSI) N18.2a 1975/ANS 51.8, American National Standard Revision and Addendum to Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants, ANSI N18.2 1973.
   " American Nuclear Society/American National Standards Institute (ANS/ANSI) 51.1, Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants.
   " AISC Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings, February 12, 1969
  • AISC-ANSI-N690-1984 "Nuclear Facilities Steel Safety-Related Structures for Design, Fabrication and Erection" Page 11 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

3. Personnel Qualifications The personnel qualification for all individuals involved in the execution of the Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, can be found in this section.

Full resumes for the listed individuals can be found in Appendix A of this document. 3.1. Equipment Selection Personnel The personnel who performed equipment selection and review are:

  • Mike Earles, Watts Bar Reactor Operator and Senior Reactor Operator for 18 years.

" Bill Sprinkle, Reactor Operator at various nuclear power plants for over 15 years, including Arkansas Nuclear One and Watts Bar. " Mike Gordon, Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee with over nineteen years of experience, including stress analysis, pipe support design, pipe material, and valve specifications. " Travis Hockenberry, Professional Engineer in the State of Pennsylvania with 5 years of engineering experience, including 2 years in the nuclear power industry. 3.2. Seismic Walkdown Engineers The personnel who performed the seismic walkdowns are:

  • Mike Gordon

" Travis Hockenberry " Phillip York, Associate Structural Engineer with 5 years of engineering experience, including 2 years in the nuclear power industry. " James Edgar, Professional Engineer in the state of Tennessee with 11 years of engineering experience, including 2 years in the nuclear power industry. 3.3. Licensing Basis Reviewers The personnel who performed the licensing basis reviews are: 9 Bryce Cusick, Civil Engineer with 3 years of experience with the Tennessee Valley Authority at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. 3.4. IPEEE Reviewers The personnel who performed the review of IPEEE vulnerabilities are:

  • Phillip York

" Joshua Best, Project Mechanical Engineer with 5 years engineering experience, including 4 years in the nuclear power industry. Page 12 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 3.5. Peer Review Team The personnel who performed the peer review are:

  • Steve Eder, Over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, project management, seismic engineering, and risk management.
  • John Dizon, Over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management.

Steve Eder is the Peer Review Team Leader Page 13 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

4. Selection of Structures, Systems and Components The selection of Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) for the Recommendation 2.3 Seismic followed the guidelines provided in Reference 3 - The ElectricalPower Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance."

4.1. SWEL Selection The development of SWEL 1 began with the Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL) that was developed as part of the Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE) implementation at Watts Bar, found in Reference 5 - IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations- Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List. This list fulfills the requirements of Screens #1 through #3 found in the EPRI walkdown guidance document. The SSEL was then categorized by unit, location, system, equipment class, and safety function. These categories fulfill the Screen #4 requirements of systems, equipment types, and environments. Safety Function "0 - Support Function" was added in addition to the EPRI guidance to categorize equipment that does not perform one particular safety function but does support all five safety functions. The locations included in the SSEL include the: 

   " Control Building
   " Auxiliary Building
   " Reactor Building
  • Diesel Generator Building
  • Emergency Raw Cooling Water Pump Station.

The six safety functions are:

0. Support function
1. Reactor reactivity control
2. Reactor coolant pressure control
3. Reactor coolant inventory control
4. Decay heat removal
5. Containment function This categorized list is presented in Appendix B as Base List 1. After separating the data into the previously mentioned categories, a sample was selected from Base List 1 to represent all special considerations that were required by the EPRI Walkdown Guidance. This sample was reviewed and compared to plant documentation to locate any new or modified equipment, also required by EPRI Screen #4.

In accordance with the EPRI guidance, SWEL 1 includes consideration of the importance of the contribution of risk for the SSCs. SWELl was compared to the Core Page 14 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted. Some of the equipment classes that were listed in the EPRI walkdown guidance were not covered in the original IPEEE SSEL, and therefore are not present in Base List 1. However, in order to include all of the classes of equipment, the scope of the selection was expanded for this seismic walkdown to include other Category I Safety Related equipment for the classes that were not previously covered. SWEL 1 represents the full list of equipment that was selected from Base List 1 and from the Category I equipment list. SWEL 1 can be found in Appendix D. Base List 2, presented in Appendix C, is a complete list of all spent fuel pool systems and equipment. SWEL 2 is derived from this list and includes any equipment or system that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of fuel assemblies. After review of spent fuel pool layout drawings and consulting with plant personnel, it was determined that no equipment or system failure could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposure of the fuel assemblies. SWEL 2 can be found in Appendix D. 4.2. SWEL Analysis The combined SWEL for Watts Bar Unit 1, which consists of 120 items of equipment, adequately addresses all criteria that were required for the selection of SSCs in the EPRI "Seismic Walkdown Guidance." These criteria include a distribution of environments, systems, safety functions, and classes of equipment. The following items were selected in order to address the new and improved equipment criteria of EPRI Screen #4 for Watts Bar Unit 1: UNID Description WBN-0-XSW-236-68DC2-S 125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, BATTERY BOARDS 1/11 WBN-O-XSW-236-79DC1-S 125V DC TRANSFER SWITCH, CHARGERS 7S/9S WBN-0-CHGR-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER I WBN-0-CHGR-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BATTERY CHARGER III WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INSTR INVERTER 0-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-1 WBN-1-INV-235-0002-E 120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-11 WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 1-111 Table 1 - New and Improved Equipment Page 15 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit I

5. Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys Guidance for performing the walkdowns and walk-bys required for Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3 Seismic can be found in Reference 3 - The ElectricalPower Research Institute's "Seismic Walkdown Guidance."

The walkdowns and walk-bys were conducted in accordance with this guideline and each was given a final status. If no issues were noted or only housekeeping and minor maintenance issues were noted during a walkdown or walk-by, a YES status was given to the selected piece of equipment or area. If a potentially adverse seismic condition was noted, a NO status was given and a Corrective Action Program (CAP) Entry was written to begin a functional evaluation. If any equipment was inaccessible, or if a portion of an item of equipment was unobservable, an UNKNOWN status was given. It is noted that there were no inaccessible SWEL items at Watts Bar Unit 1. 5.1. Seismic Walkdown Procedure All one hundred and twenty (120) Seismic Walkdowns Checklists (SWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1. These checklists can be found in Appendix E of this document. The primary types of potentially adverse seismic conditions that were addressed during these walkdowns include: 

   " Bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware
   " Corrosion (beyond mild surface oxidation)
   " Visible cracks in surrounding concrete
   " Impact of soft targets
   " Collapsing equipment
  • Inadequate line flexibility Forty-nine (49) Area Walk-by Checklists (AWCs) were completed at Watts Bar Unit 1.

These checklists can be found in Appendix F of this document. The primary areas of observation for potentially adverse seismic conditions that were considered during these walk-bys include: 

   " Anchorage of equipment
   " Cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducts
  • Spatial interactions between equipment
   " Flooding/Spray hazards
   " Fire hazards
   " Housekeeping and temporary equipment Anchorage configuration for 55 items of equipment in Watts Bar Unit 1 was verified by drawings and/or calculations.

Page 16 of 451

INTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 For cabinets and panels that were selected for walkdown, NRC guidance was followed to determine which could and could not be opened for internal inspection. Undue safety hazards, operational hazards, or cabinets that required extensive disassembly were documented and only observable anchorage was included in those walkdowns. 5.2. SWC & AWC Summary The results documented by the SWCs for Watts Bar Unit 1 are summarized below: 

   ,    110 SWCs and 45 AWCs resulted in a YES status
  • 10 SWCs and 4 AWCs resulted in a NO status o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1
  • WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, Diesel Gen Engine 1Al Start Air Receiver A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 0 WBN-WB-001, Diesel Generator 1A-A, Room D104 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 0 WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL E WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A, D.G. 1A-A MCR PNL 2 WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B, D.G. 2B-B MCR PNL o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 N WBN-WB-010, ERCW Pump Room A, Room 1105 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 0 WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, Reactor Vent Board 1B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 8 WBN-WB-030,480V Board Room 1A, Room A851 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 N WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, Distribution BD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 a WBN-WB-032, Mechanical Equipment Room 1B, Room A924 o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 0 WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B o Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11
                 " WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, 120V AC Vital Inverter 0-1
                 " WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F, 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-111 Page 17 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

6. Licensing Basis Evaluations 6.1. Licensing Basis Calculations When a potentially adverse seismic condition was identified at WBN, the condition was entered into the corrective action program. No licensing basis evaluations were performed by the walkdown team per TVA expectations to communicate any potential operability concerns as soon as they were identified. Due to the nature of this process, no calculations were performed by the walkdown team for licensing basis evaluations before the CAP entry was submitted. All licensing basis determinations were performed by WBN engineering on each CAP entry.

Multiple CAP entries were generated during the seismic walkdown process at Watts Bar Unit 1. There were a total of eleven CAP entries that were considered potential seismically adverse conditions. No degraded or non-conforming conditions were found during the course of this walkdown process. 6.2. Potential Seismically Adverse Conditions The potentially seismically adverse seismic conditions summarized above are described in more detail below. 6.2.1. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 1 During the walkdown for WBN-1-TANK-082-0160-A, it was found that the bottom connection on the south U-bolt connection to the support saddle is not tight to the restraint. On the north U-bolt connection to the support side, the bottom connection is missing the washer. A CAP entry was submitted to correct the loose and missing hardware. 6.2.2. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 2 During the area walk-by for he Diesel Generator Room D104 (WBN-WB-001) a problem with the 1A-A Air Receiver Tank was noted. Of the two inboard anchor plates, the south anchor plate on the tank is installed such that it is resting inside the saddle. This limits it ability to function properly. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and site engineering performed an evaluation. 6.2.3. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 3 During the walkdown for WBN-0-PNL-278-M026A-A and WBN-0-PNL-278-M012, it was found that one of the four visible connecting bolts on the south side of the bolted joint between MCR panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M015 was sheared off and one was missing. Two bolts were missing between panels WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 and WBN-0-PNL-278-M026D-B on the south side. A CAP entry was submitted and work was scheduled to replace the missing bolts. Page 18 of 451

hNTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.4. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 4 During the area walk-by for room 1105 of the Intake Pumping Station (WBN-WB-010) it was found that temporary scaffolding near ERCW pump 0-PMP-67-32 is not adequately restrained to prevent interaction with the pump motor during a seismic event. Lateral restraint was not provided in one direction at a sufficient height to prevent tipping towards the pump motor. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and the scaffolding was removed. 6.2.5. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 5 During the walkdown for WBN-1-MCC-232-B-B, it was found that a cap plate on a tube steel cable tray support was in direct contact with a conduit collar on the MCC. The conduit number in question was not legible. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue. 6.2.6. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 During the area walk by in the 480V Board Room 1A (WBN-WB-030) a fire protection sprinkler head deflector was found to be in direct contact with a four inch conduit. The conduit in question is PLC-1709, which runs into 1-JB-282-1770, and is located behind panel 10 of WBN-1-MCC-213-AO01-A. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue. 6.2.7. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 7 During the walkdown for WBN-0-DBD-238-0003, in the Main Control Room, a copier was observed in close proximity of the breaker side of the panel. The copier is not restrained and does not meet the overturn criteria that would indicate it would be safe from tipping during a seismic event. Additionally, there is a drawing table in the area that is not restrained but would not cause a risk to the panel. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it will be evaluated by Civil Engineering in the form of a Specific Case Engineering Evaluation. 6.2.8. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 8 During the area walk by in the Mechanical Equipment Room A924 (WBN-WB-032) a sheared anchor bolt was observed on the 480V Board Room Condenser B-B. All remaining anchor bolts appear to be in good condition with only minor to moderate surface corrosion. A CAP entry was submitted to address this issue. Page 19 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 6.2.9. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 9 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was approximately 1/8" or less. The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements. It should be noted that the anchorage was not visible during the initial walkdown of the equipment. The condition was observed during a subsequent inspection after the insulation surrounding the baseplate and anchorage was removed. 6.2.10. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 10 During the walkdown for WBN-0-CHR-031-0049/2-B, significant corrosion was observed on the south pedestal baseplate and anchor bolts. The amount of material reduction was in excess of 1/8". The north pedestal had significant corrosion as well. A CAP entry was submitted to address the issue and it was determined that sufficient material exists to meet seismic requirements. 6.2.11. Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 11 During the walkdown for WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D, the spacing tolerance of +/- 3" is violated between the third and fourth anchor bolts on the front of the inverter. The field measured spacing between these bolts is 9-3/4". Per plant documentation, this spacing should be 1'-1-3/116", which is 3-7/16" greater than the as-installed anchor spacing. The as built dimension for one anchor bolt on the front of WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F does not match plant documentation. Per plant documentation, the first anchor spacing on the right side of the cabinet should be 15-5/8". The dimension in the field was measured to be 18-1/4". A CAP entry was submitted to address these issues and the calculation and drawings shall be revised as necessary to document the acceptability of the as-installed anchorage configuration. Page 20 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

7. IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report Information for the IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report is derived from Reference 5

- IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations- Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Shutdown Equipment List. 7.1. IPEEE Description In Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that the utilities for all active nuclear power plants in the United States perform an evaluation of their nuclear power generating facilities to identify any vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of several plant-specific external events, and to access the impact of these vulnerabilities on the potential for plant core damage or radioactive material release. This program, designated the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE), is a corollary program to the Individual Plant Examination (IPE) which focused on the vulnerabilities associated with the occurrence of external events. 7.2. IPEEE Findings and Vulnerabilities For Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant the Response Level Earthquake (RLE) is specified as a median spectral shape from NUREG/CR-0098 anchored to a peak ground acceleration of 0.3g. Screening and evaluation of outliers is performed at the level of the RLE through the use of scaled existing amplified response spectra. The vertical ground response spectrum for the RLE is taken as 2/3 of the horizontal. The items walked down during the IPEEE program were found to be rugged and robust. The IPEEE walkdowns note whether or not the items could be screened out as a result of the walkdown observations coupled with the walkdown team knowledge of the design basis conservatism's for each item. High confidence low probability of failure (HCLPF) seismic capacity calculations were prepared for items which could not be screened by other means and in all cases, the calculated HCLPF seismic capacities are greater than 0.3g. Table 2 summarizes the WBN HCLPF calculations and results. Page 21 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Item Resolution HCLPF Masonry Walls 0.53g 6900V Shutdown Boards 0.45g DG Air Intake Filters 1.78g Main Control Room AHU 0.56g Aux. Building Roof Diaphragm 0.75g RHR Pumps 0.50g 480V Shutdown Board Transformers 0.38g Control Air Pre and Aft 1.08g Filters CCS Heat Exchangers 0.38g ERCW Pumps 0.40g IPS Screen Wash Pumps 0.36g 480V Reactor MOV, Vent, 040g Cont. and Aux Boards Main Control Room Ceiling Structure Main Control Room 070g Electrical Panels 0.70g

  • Original HCLPF capacity of 0.36g was updated to 0.52g based on non-linear analyses of the ceiling system. No modifications were required.

Table 2 - Resolution of Seismic IPEEE Outliers For observations such as maintenance and housekeeping issues, maintenance was notified and responded to these issues. It was not necessary to prepare any DCN's as part of the IPEEE seismic walkdowns. Page 22 of 451 

 .iu                                   NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1
8. Peer Review A peer review was performed in accordance with References 2 and 3. The peer review process involved considerable interaction with the review teams, and was performed throughout all phases of the effort including the following:
  • Selection of the SSCs included on the SWEL
     " In-plant walkdown observations and completed checklists for the Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys
     " Identified potentially adverse seismic conditions, utilization of the CAP process, and associated licensing basis review considerations
     " Submittal report In summary, the peer review results are confirmatory and fully supportive of the evaluations and findings as described in this report. The completed peer review report is included as Appendix G to this report.

Page 23 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

9. References Reference Document Title Document Preparer No. Number 1 Recommendations for Enhancing N/A United States Reactor Safety in the 2 1 st Century Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 Letter: Request for Information N/A United States Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Nuclear Federal Regulations 50.54 (f) Regulatory Regarding Recommendations 2.1, Commission 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident 3 Seismic Walkdown Guidance for EPRI Report Electric Power Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term 1025286 Research Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Institute Seismic 4 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Living Final WBNP-9 Tennessee Safety Analysis Report Amendment Valley 9 Authority 5 IPEEE Seismic Margin Evaluations - WBNIPEEE-001 Tennessee Safe Shutdown Paths and Safe Valley Shutdown Equipment List I Authority Page 24 of 451

NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1

10. Appendices Page 25 of 451

rr* NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Watts Bar Unit 1 Appendix A: Resumes Resumes included in this Appendix are alphabetized by last name. " Joshua Best - Fukushima Project Engineer " Bryce Cusick - Site Engineer " John Dizon - Facility Risk Consultants " Mike Earles - Senior Reactor Operator

  • Steve Eder - Facility Risk Consultants

" James Edgar - Lead Technical Engineer " Travis Hockenberry - Walkdown Engineer " Mike Gordon - Lead Engineer

  • Bill Sprinkle - Tennessee Valley Authority

" Phillip York - Walkdown Engineer Page 26 of 451

Joshua H. Best ihbcst(i.Wtva.agov or loshua.Hl.Bestsr(a .tgetntlundy.com TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer - Civil Design Experience S&L, LLC TVA Fukushima Response Team Project Engineer - Civil Design Dec. 2011 - Present - Primary technical lead for NRC's request for information under 10 CFR 50.54(o Recommendations 2.1 - Seismic and Flooding Re-evaluations and 2.3 -- Seismic and Flooding walk downs including developing project strategy, project scoping, developing and maintaining project schedules and budgets, participating in industry meetings and teleconferences, and contractor oversight. - Responsible for supporting all civil design functions associated with response to NRC "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events" as required under EA-12-049. S&L, LLC. Mechanical Senior Associate - Pipe Stress Analyst June 2008 to Nov. 2011 " ASME Class 2 and 3 and B31.1 piping and component qualification using TVA TPIPE piping analysis software and hand calculations " Knowledge of AMSE B31.1 and ASME Section III and VIII code requirements " Responsible for Minimum Wall Calculations (FAC Evaluations), Component Qualifications (valves and nozzles), Commodity Clearance Evaluations, Temporary Shielding Requests (pipe stress qualification), and Functional Evaluations for Plant Operability

  • Task Manager for numerous design change packages at Browns Ferry, Watts Bar and Sequoyah nuclear plants including responsibility for scoping and maintaining project schedule, budget, and interdisciplinary work flow Tennessee Valley Authority, Fossil Power Group, Intern June 2007 - May 2008 Technical Support Services (Metallurgy and Welding)

Memberships

  • Licensed Engineering Intern in Tennessee (Passed Fundamentals of Engineering Exam (October 2007))

,Member of American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) -Member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Education BSME, Mechanical Engineering: May 2008 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN Focus: Energy Systems Related Course Work: Thermodynamics, Thermal Component Design, Advanced Fluids, Energy Conversion Bachelor of Arts, Natural Science: May 2008 Covenant College, Lookout Mountain, GA Related course work: Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics Page 27 of 451

Bryce C. Cusick Civil Engineer

SUMMARY

Civil Engineer with 3 years of experience with the Tennessee Valley Authority at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. Job Experience includes designing structural modifications with plant system, equipment seismic qualification, design change field implementation, and other various roles of a Civil Engineer. Familiar with AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code, and ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for buildings and other structures. Proficient with current design software including AutoCAD and MathCAD. EXPERIENCE Tennessee Valley Authority- Served as a Civil Engineer within the Civil Engineering Design Group at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant since May 2009. Is qualified in Equipment Seismic Qualification and performed numerous evaluations of equipment during the procurement process. Responsible for field support for many torque applications and design change implementation. Familiar with the TVA CAP process and how it is used for problem identification and resolution. Qualified Civil Engineer in the Maintenance Rule Program responsible for maintaining structural condition of plant buildings and entering them into the CAP program and Maintenance Rule Tracking Calculation in order to monitor and drive resolution. Pipe Support Design and qualification using TVA software including FAPPS (ME150), BASEPLATE II (ME035), AutoCAD, MathCAD. Other responsibilities include field support, design change packages, verification of others work, and interface with other departments within and outside of the Engineering Organization. EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2008 Page 28 of 451

JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY FacilityRisk Consultants,Inc., Huntsville, Alabama, President, 2002-present ABS Consulting (formerly EQE International),Oakland, California, Director and Vice President of Facility Risk Division, 2000-2002 EQE International,Oakland, California, Vice President, 1998-2000; Associate, 1991-1998; Senior Engineer, 1986-1991 Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Cupertino, California, Senior Engineer, 1984-1986 General Electric Company, San Jose, California, Senior Engineer, 1984 URS/John A. Blume & Associates, San Francisco, California, Senior Engineer, 1982-1984; Associate Engineer, 1977-1980 Structural Systems Engineering, Inc., Lafayette, California, Senior Engineer, 1980-1982 Stanford University, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Palo Alto, California, Teaching and Research Assistant, 1975-1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Dizon has over 30 years of experience in the field of civil and structural engineering, earthquake engineering, risk assessment and project management. He has extensive knowledge in the areas of seismic analyses and design assessments of primary structures and piping systems, seismic upgrade and retrofit design, seismic qualification of mechanical and electrical systems and components, and technical development of seismic evaluation criteria and programs for various industries, including power, oil and gas, petrochemical, and high tech process and manufacturing facilities. Mr. Dizon has undertaken and managed a wide variety of seismic projects, ranging from traditional structural engineering design and seismic retrofits to complex nuclear power plant and DOE facilities' seismic verification projects. He is also a guest instructor for the ASME Continuing Education Institute on seismic design and retrofit of piping systems and mechanical equipment. At present, Mr. Dizon is primarily involved with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation, in providing engineering consulting services for various structural and seismic-related civil issues in support of Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 Completion Project. He also provides seismic consulting services to other industries, including defense contractors and commercial equipment manufacturers, among others. As President of Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Dizon is responsible for business development and project management activities, including managing all associated tasks under a subcontract with Bechtel Power Corporation for seismic-related civil issues associated with the recently completed Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Project for Tennessee Valley Authority. The seismic works included USI A-46/IPEEE implementation programs, seismic II/I spray hazard evaluations, new cable routing utilizing the SQUG/GIP methodology, MSIV seismic ruggedness verification, among others. Furthermore, he was also actively involved in the development of seismic II/I design criteria for distribution systems and equipment for 1 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 29 of 451

JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E. DOE's PDCF project, under a subcontract with the Washington Group, Inc.; and in the seismic qualification of various essential equipment for DoD's GMD project, under a subcontract with Bechtel National, Inc. and its vendors. In addition, Mr. Dizon has participated as a subject matter expert witness in a litigation project for a large foreign company in the area of seismic performance of structures, piping systems and associated equipment associated with earthquake damges in a coal-fired power plant located in South America. As EQE Project Manager for various seismic programs associated with the restart of Browns Ferry Units 2 and 3, Mr. Dizon was responsible for all engineering activities associated with USI A-46 resolution and seismic IPEEE implementation; seismic proximity and II/I spray interaction evaluations; MSIV seismic ruggedness verification; cable tray and conduit raceway and supports; and HVAC support evaluation programs. These activities consisted of seismic criteria development, seismic walkdown assessments and mitigation of findings, including retrofit designs and plant upgrades. He was also responsible for the A-46 seismic evaluation program for major equipment items at Davis-Besse, Duane Arnold and H.B. Robinson power plants. Mr. Dizon also served as Project Manager for the HVAC seismic verification program at Salem Nuclear Plant, MSIV seismic projects at Hope Creek and Brunswick plants, and participated in a number of related seismic evaluation projects at Sequoyah, Watts Bar, Bellefonte, Pickering A, Bruce A, Forsmark, Liebstadt, among others. As Managing Director of EQE's Hsinchu, Taiwan project office following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, he was in charge of the region's business development and project management. Mr. Dizon managed a number of seismic risk assessment and structural upgrade projects for the high tech industry, including seismic consultation on a number of projects for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., seismic strengthening projects for United Microelectronics, Applied Materials, Winbond Electronics and Macronix International in Taiwan. In addition, he also managed the seismic upgrades for the Cypress Semiconductor and Amkor facilities and seismic design review project for IBM in the Philippines, seismic risk assessment for AMP facilities in Japan, and seismic assessment of structural and non-structural components of clean room facilities at several Intel fab plants in the Northwest region in U.S., among others. As Group Manager for EQE at the US Department of Energy Savannah River Site, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the seismic verification program of safety-related mechanical and electrical systems and components. His tasks included developing seismic evaluation criteria and procedures for restart and long-term seismic programs; managing the seismic walkdown and evaluation efforts; providing technical support in resolving seismic issues; and serving as an interface with the client. Mr. Dizon was also responsible for the seismic walkdown and evaluation of various distribution systems and critical equipment at the Pantex Facilities, including developing the walkdown screening criteria and evaluation acceptance criteria. Mr. Dizon has participated in the seismic evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This project involved performing seismic analyses and upgrades for the primary coolant piping system and related equipment, and the reactor and control buildings. Other DOE facilities he has involvement with included Los Alamos, Livermore and Hanford sites. Mr. Dizon has also been involved in a number of risk assessment programs for petrochemical plants and refineries, including seismic walkdowns at the 2 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 30 of 451

JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E. Imperial West Chemical plants in Pittsburg and Antioch, CA; Tosco Refinery in Avon, CA; and Dupont Chemical plant in Antioch, CA, among others. At EDAC, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and verification of a pipe support optimization program (OPTPIPE) and was involved in a number of snubber reduction pilot projects. Other areas of his involvement consisted of finite element analyses of the MX-missile launch tube components and systems for thermal and pressure loads, equipment qualification of major mechanical and electrical components, and seismic evaluation of cooling towers. With General Electric Company, Mr. Dizon was responsible for stress analysis and code conformation of main steam and recirculation piping systems for generic BWR plants. He was also involved in the developmental phase of an in-house pipe support optimization program. At URS/Blume & Associates, Mr. Dizon was responsible for the development and maintenance of in-house computer programs for both linear and nonlinear analyses of structural and piping systems. He was also involved in the linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses, finite element modeling, and generation of floor response spectra for several nuclear power plants. He helped develop a soil-structure interaction computer program using a three-dimensional finite element technique to evaluate the dynamic response of structures due to arbitrary plane body and surface wave excitations. He performed a research study involving soil-structure interaction analysis using the finite element FLUSH program to investigate the dynamic response of typical containment structures due to underground blast excitations. Mr. Dizon worked as a consultant to Bechtel Power Corporation with Structural Systems Engineering, Inc. He performed structural analyses and design assessments of the primary containment structure and the reactor/control buildings of several BWR plants for the various types of hydrodynamic loads. He was involved in a BWR in-plant test procedures, data reduction and correlation study to determine the dynamic response, including soil-structure interaction of the reactor/control buildings during GE Mark II reactor hydrodynamic load actuation in the primary containment. At Stanford University, Mr. Dizon performed statistical analyses of earthquake accelerograms and various response parameters, as part of his research work under Professor Haresh Shah. He also conducted seismic risk analyses and formulated seismic design criteria for Nicaragua. In addition, he was involved in the dynamic testing of structural models and equipment. EDUCATION STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Palo Alto, California: Engineer Degree, 1977 STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Palo Alto, California: M.S. Structural Engineering, 1975 MAPUA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Manila, Philippines: B.S. Civil Engineering, 1973 3 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 31 of 451

JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E. AFFILIATIONS AND AWARDS Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Strategic Partner Philippine Board Examination for Civil Engineers, Fifth Place, 1973 Philippine Association of Civil Engineers, Certificate of Merit, 1974 REGISTRATION California: Civil Engineer Philippines: Civil Engineer SELECTED PUBLICATIONS With S. J. Eder, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter." SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007. With S. J. Eder, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006. With S. J. Eder, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005. With S. J. Eder, and R. D. Cutsinger. 2003. "Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations." Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003. With S. J. Eder. 2003. "Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003. With S. J. Eder, W. H. Tong, and E. H. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing. Oakland, CA. October, 1999. With S. J. Eder. 1998. "Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities -- Focus on Business Interruption". Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization. Manila, Philippines. October, 1998. With F. R. Beigi. 1995. "Application of Seismic Experience Based Criteria for Safety Related HVAC Duct System Evaluation." Fifth DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Symposium, Denver, Colorado, November 13-14, 1995. With S. J. Eder, J. F. Glova, and R. L. Koch. 1994. "Seismic Adequacy Verification of HVAC Duct Systems and Supports for an USI A-46 Nuclear Power Plant." Fifth Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, Florida, December 14-16, 1994. 4 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 32 of 451

JOHN 0. DIZON, P.E. With E. J. Frevold and P. D. Osborne. 1993. "Seismic Qualification of Safety-related HVAC Duct Systems and Supports." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, Denver, Colorado, July 1993. With S. J. Eder. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping Systems." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, San Diego, California, June 1991. With R. D. Campbell and L. W. Tiong. 1990. "Response Predictions for Piping Systems Which Have Experienced Strong Motion Earthquakes." ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 17-21, 1990. With S. P. Harris, R. S. Hashimoto, and R. L. Stover. 1989. "Seismic, High Wind, and Probabilistic Risk Assessments of the High Flux Isotope Reactor." Second DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference. With D. Ray and A. Kabir. 1979. "A 3-D Seismic Analysis for Arbitrary Plane Body and Surface Wave Excitations." American Society of Civil Engineers Nuclear Specialty Conference, Boston, Massachusetts. With D. Ray and A. Zebarjadian. 1978. "Dynamic Response of Surface and Embedded Disk Foundations for SH, SV, P and Rayleigh Wave Excitations." Sixth Indian Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, India. "A Statistical Analysis of Earthquake Acclerograms and Response Parameters." 1977. Thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, and L. Padilla. 1977. "A Seismic Design Procedure for Nicaragua." Paper presented at the Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India. With H. Shah, T. Zsutty, H. Krawinkler, C. P. Mortgat, and A. Kiremidjian. 1976. "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaragua, Part II, Summary and Commentary." John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 12A and 12B. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 5 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 33 of 451

Mike Earles 685 Pine Hollow Rd. Dayton, Tn. 37321 Home phone - 423-775-0220 Home e-mail - jmlce@bellsouth.net Work phone - 423-365-3796 Work e-mail - jmearles@tva.gov 1968 - 1972: United States Marine Corps. Professional experience 1977 - 2005: TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. Nuclear Assistant Unit Operator 0 Performed field activities in support of Pre-Operational testing. Nudear Unit Operator (NRC RO License)

  • Performed Hot Functional testing and Startup testing.

Unit Supervisor (NRC SRO License) 0 Responsible for managing the safe operation of WBN Unit 1. Simulator and Classroom Instructor (NRC SRO License)

  • Instructor for Cold License Reactor Operator (RO) upgrade training.
  • Lead Instructor for Advanced Electrical training.
                       " Lead Licensed Operator Requalilication Instructor, responsible for the conduct of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training program.

Unit Manager (NRC SRO License)

  • Review, prioritize, coordinate, and approve plant work activities.

50.59 qualified. IQR qualified. Operations Shift Manaqer 1987 - 2005 (NRC SRO License).

  • Responsible for the safe operation of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.

2005 - Present: Retired, contracted to TVA; 

                       "   Revised Operating and Test procedures.
                       "   Assisted in developing the U1C7 Refueling Outage plan.
                       "   Directed Tagging Office during U1C7 S/G replacement RFO.
  • Conducted Electrical training for Initial License class ILT 607.
                       "   Lead Instructor for ILC 607, conducted both simulator and classroom training for subsequent ILT classes.
                       " Developed, administered and reviewed all of the Initial License Training weekly and NRC prep exams from 2009 through early 2012.
  • Currently on-site coordinator for WBN Fukushima Flood Walkdowns.

Special assignments Approved and Coordinated WBN system transfers from Construction/Start Up Testing organization to the Plant Operations department. Qualified as Startup Advisor (6 month training tour at McGuire Nuclear Plant). Team Leader for verification, validation, and implementation of WBN Emergency Operating Procedures Upgrade. Coordinated Operations activities, and participated in, NRC 'Force on Force' drills. Page 34 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Facility Risk Consultants,Huntsville, Alabama, Chief Executive Officer, 2003-present ABS Consulting, Houston, Texas, Vice President, North Asia Pacific Region, 2001-2003 EQE International,San Francisco, California, Senior Vice President, 1985-2001 (ABS Purchased EQE in 2000). URS/John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, San Francisco, California, 1982-1985

1. G. Bouwkamp, Inc., Structural Engineers,Berkeley, California, 1981-1982 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Stephen J. Eder provides senior engineering and management consultant services, licensing support, and expert testimony in the fields of natural hazards risk assessment, seismic analysis, structural performance evaluation, and retrofit design. His background includes project management, engineering, risk management, and planning for domestic and multinational corporations, insurance and financial institutions, construction companies, utilities, and the government. Mr. Eder is based in Madison, Alabama.

Prior to Facility Risk Consultants, Mr. Eder was stationed in Tokyo, Japan for 8 years and led all operations for ABS Consulting Inc. (formerly EQE International, Inc.) in Japan, China, Korea and Taiwan -- including risk consulting, structural engineering and design, probabilistic financial loss estimation, and the development and maintenance of management systems. Mr. Eder has performed many post-earthquake reconnaissance studies -- most notably he led investigations of the M8.4 earthquake in Arequipa, Peru of June 2001; the M7.6 earthquake in Chichi, Taiwan of September 1999; and he was lead investigator of the M8.1 earthquake in Mexico of September 1985, for the US Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI). Prior to his assignment in Japan, Mr. Eder focused primarily in the seismic risk evaluation and seismic retrofit design of critical equipment and systems. Mr. Eder pioneered the development of many seismic risk evaluation procedures and criteria for the US and European nuclear power industry, the Seismic Qualification Utilities Group (SQUG), and the US Department of Energy (DOE). This included conducting a series of week-long seismic evaluation training courses for a total of about 500 engineers, and serving as subject matter expert and technical liason for industry groups. Mr. Eder served as project manager or project consultant for the seismic risk surveys of critical equipment and systems at about 60 nuclear power plants in the US and Europe, and many DOE facilities. He performed research for and supported many U.S. industry and professional groups, to advance the state-of-the-art of seismic risk assessment techniques and seismic design guidelines. 1 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 35 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Berkeley: M.Eng., Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, 1982 CLARKSON COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, Potsdam, New York: B.S., Magna Cum Laude, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1980 REGISTRATION California: Civil Engineer, 1985 Alabama: Civil Engineer, 2003 PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Applied Technology Council Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Honor Society Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society American and British Chambers of Commerce in Japan COMMITTEES -- PAST EXPERIENCE - Electric Power Research Institute - Post Earthquake Investigation Team - Leader - U.S. Departmentof Energy - Tiger Team Member - Natural Hazards Risk Analysis - U.S. Departmentof Energy - Steering Committee on Natural Hazards - Technical Liason - Mechanical and Eletrical Equipment Evaluation and Design - Seismic Qualification Utility Group - Equipment Seismic Evaluation Training - Lead Instructor and Subject Matter Expert - Joint Aýmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers and Inlstitute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers - Special Seismic Qualification Working Group - CoChairman - National Centerfor EarthquakeEngineeringResearch - Critical Equipment Seismic Risk Analysis - Chief Researcher - National FireProtection Association (NFPA) - Seismic Technical Committee Member, NFPA-13. - Building Seismic Safety Council - Seismic Rehabilitation Advisory Panel Member - Mechanical Equipment. NEHRP, FEMA 273. - American Society of Civil Engineers - Electrical Raceway and HVAC Duct Seismic Design - Working Groups - Structural Engineers Association of California- Seismology Subcommittee - Non-Building Structures and Equipment 2 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 36 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER SELECTED PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS With J. 0. Dizon, 2007. "Seismic Qualification Case Study for a New Inverter." SMiRT-19 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 12-17, 2007. With J. 0. Dizon, 2006. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data for Seismic Qualification of Equipment." Prepared for Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). June 22, 2006. With J. 0. Dizon, 2005. "Seismic Qualification Case Study." Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute and Seismic Qualification Utility Group. December 2005. With J. 0. Dizon, and R. D. Cutsinger. 2003. " Browns Ferry Cable Tray Evaluations." Presented to the SQUG/SEQUAL Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, December 10-12, 2003. With J. 0. Dizon. 2003. " Technical Position Paper for Seismic II/I Design of Cable Tray Raceway Systems at PDCF." Presented to Washington Group, Inc., December 2003. 

"Analysis of Ilo2 Plant Components Affected by the June :23, 2001 Mw 8.4 Arequipa, Peru Earthquake". Prepared for Hitachi Corporation. December 2002. Presented in London, U.K.

"The Use of Modeling and Natural Risk Analysis for Power Plants". Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore. "Using Risk Based Inspection Techniques to Assess Maintenance of Power Plants". 2002. Presented at Second International Conference on Mitigating Your Risks in Energy. February 2002. Singapore. "Preparing Your Properties for Major Earthquakes". 2001. Prepared for Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Subcomittee, American Chamber of Commerce in Japan. December 2001. Tokyo. "Earthquake Hazards and Earthquake Risks in Tokyo". 2001. TELS-Setagaya, Earthquake Disaster Information and Preparedness Seminar. October 2001. Tokyo. "Geographic Information Systems". 2000. Prepared for Non-Life Insurance Institute, ISJ Advanced Course 2000 Program, Natural Hazards and Underwriting Capacity. November 2000. Tokyo. With J. 0. Dizon, W. H. Tong, and E. R. Wong, 1999. "Chichi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 (M7.6). An EQE Briefing. Oakland, CA. October, 1999. With G.S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, M.D. Quilici, and C.R. Scawthorn, 1999. "Seismic Reliability Assessment of Critical Facilities: A Handbook, Supporting Documentation, and Model Code Provisions." Technical Report MCEER-99-0008. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY. "Earthquake Risk of Independent Power Producer Stations", 1999. Prepared for Lloyd's Japan Power Seminar. June 1999. Tokyo. 3 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 37 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER With J. 0. Dizon. 'Risk Management for Power and Industrial Facilities -- Focus on Business Interruption". Second Biennial Federation of Asian Pacific & African Risk Management Organization. Manilla, Philippines. October, 1998. "3 Years After the Hanshin-Kobe Earthquake, Earthquake Risk Management, Damage Assessment and Mitigation". 1998. High Pressure Gase Safety Association of Japan. Vol. 35, No. 2 (1998). Tokyo. With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "A Method to Assess and Improve the Operational Reliability of Critical Systems Following Earthquakes." Presented at the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA, June 1998. With G. S. Johnson, R.E. Sheppard, and S.P. Harris. 1998. "The Development of Model Code Provisions to Address System Reliability Following Earthquakes." Presented at the ATC-29-1 Seminar on Seismic Design, Retrofit, and Performance of Nonstructural Components, San Francisco, CA, January 1998. With D. W. Jones, M. K. Ravindra, C. R. Scawthorn, and K. Iida. 1996. "Earthquake Risk Management for Process Industries". High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan. Vol. 35, No. 5 (1996). Tokyo. With G. A. Antaki. 1994. "Recommended Provisions for Equipment Seismic Qualification Consistent with IEEE and ASME Criteria for Use of Experience." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering, Volume 2. With P. J. Butler and R. P. Kassawara. 1994. "Application of the Generic Implementation Procedure Methodology to Demonstrate Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts in USI A-46 Plants." ASME 1994, PVP-Vol. 275-2, Seismic Engineering - Volume 2. Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois. With N. P. Smith and R. P. Kassawara. 1994. "Future Direction for the Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Proceedings American Power Conference, Illinois Institute of Technology, April 1994, Chicago, Illinois. With M. W. Eli and M. W. Salmon. November 1993. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." UCRL-ID-115714, Revision 2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. "Seismic Design of Important Systems and Components--Functionality Considerations." 1993. Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, 1993 Fall Seminar, Nonstructural Components: Design and Detailing. San Francisco, California. With C. Scawthorn, M. Zadeh, and G. Johnson. 1993. "Economic Impacts of Earthquake Damage to Nonstructural Components." 40th North American Meetings of the Regional Sciences Association International, Houston, Texas. With M. W. Barlow, R. J. Budnitz, and M. W. Eli. 1993. "Use of Experience Data for DOE Seismic Evaluations." 4th DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. With K. Porter, G. S. Johnson, M. M. Zadeh, and C. Scawthorn. 1993. "Seismic Vulnerability of Equipment in Critical Facilities: Life-safety and Operational Consequences." Technical; Report NCEER-93-0022. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. 4 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 38 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER With J. K. Arros. 1993. "Applications of Experience-based Methods for Seismic Qualification of Distribution Systems." Prepared for Advanced Reactor Corporation FOAKE ALWR Seismic Qualification Project. With MPR Associates and Winston and Strawn. 1993. "Verifying the Seismic Adequacy of New and Replacement Equipment and Parts." Prepared for the SQUG Management Guidelines Document. With Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 1992. "Program Plan for the Evaluation of Systems and Components in Existing DOE Facilities Subject to Nataral Phenonema Hazards." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. With J. 0. Dizon, P. D. Baughman, and G. S. Johnson. 1992. "Peer Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Integrated Interaction Program Suspended Systems Proximity Task." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority. With G. S. Hardy, G. S. Johnson, and R. W. Cushing of EQE; MPR; S&A; and URS. 1992. "Walkdown Screening and Seismic Evaluation Training Course." Prepared for Seismic Qualification Utility Group. With M. W. Salmon. 1992. "Technical Safety Appraisal of the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant, NPH Discipline." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. With M. W. Eli. 1992. "NPH Walkdown Evaluation Summary Report - Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant." Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. With G. S. Johnson, R. H. Kincaid, and G. S. Hardy. 1992. "High-rise Building Critical Equipment Study." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. With K. E. Smith. 1992. "Seismic Performance of Standby and Emergency Power Engine Generator Systems." Prepared for National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. With M. W. Eli. 1991. "Use of Earthquake Experience Data." Prepared for the Third DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. With J. 0. Dizon. 1991. "Advancement in Design Standards for Raceway Supports and Its Applicability to Piping systems." PVP-Volume 210-1, Codes and Standards and Applications for Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Components. ASME 1991. "Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines." March 1991. EPRI Report NP-7151. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International. With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-motion Earthquakes." EPRI Report NP-7150. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International. With G. S. Johnson. March 1991. "Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Data Base Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7153. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International. With J. P. Conoscente and B. N. Sumodobila. March 1991. "Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems." EPRI Report NP-7152. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute. San Francisco, CA: EQE International. 5 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 39 of 451

STEPHENJ. EDER With Winston & Strawn, MPR Associates, Inc., etal. June 1991. "Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment." Revision 2. Prepared for the Seismic Qualification Utility Group. With M. W. Eli and L. J. Bragagnolo. 1991. "Walkthrough Screening Evaluation Field Guide, Natural Phenomena Hazards at Department of Energy Facilities." Special Release for 3rd DOE Natural Phenomena Hazard Mitigation Conference, October 1991, St. Louis, Missouri. With L. J. Bragagnolo and J. P. Conoscente. 1990. "A Proposed Methodology for the Seismic Design of Rectangular Duct Systems." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California. ATC-29. With J. J. Johnson and N. P. Smith. 1990. "Developments of the Seismic Qualification Utility Group." Applied Technology Center (ATC) Seminar on Seismic Design and Performance of Equipment and Nonstructural Elements in Building and Industrial Structures, Irvine, California. ATC-29. With W. Djordjevic, J. Eidinger, and F. Hettinger. 1990. "American Society of Civil Engineers Activities on Seismic Design of Electrical Raceways." Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990. With H. L. Williams. 1990. "Qualification of Cable Tray Supports by Earthquake Experience Data: Application at H. B. Robinson Plant" Current Issues Related of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping. Proceedings of the Third Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 1990. With R. P. Kennedy, J. D. Stevenson, J. J. Johnson, W. R. Schmidt, and K. Collins. June 1990. "Watts Bar Civil Program Review." Prepared for Tennessee Valley Authority. With J. P. Conoscente, B. N. Sumodobila, and S. P. Harris. 1989. "Seismic Fatigue Evaluation of Rod Hung Systems." Prepared for the Tenth Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, (SMiRT). With P. D. Smith and J. P. Conoscente. December 1988. "SQUG Cable Tray and Conduit Evaluation Procedure." Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Orlando, FL. With P. I. Yanev. 1988. "Evaluation of Cable Tray and Conduit Systems Using the Seismic Experience Data Base." Nuclear Engineering and Design (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 107: 149-153. With S. P. Harris, P. D. Smith, and J. E. Hoekendijk. October 1988. "Performance of Condensers and Main Steam Piping in Past Earthquakes." Report prepared for General Electric Nuclear Energy Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group. San Francisco: EQE Engineering. With J. J. Johnson, G. S. Hardy, N. G. Horstman, G. Rigamonti, M. R. Reyne, and D. R. Ketcham. August 1988. "Technical Basis, Procedures and Guidelines for, Seismic Characterization of Savannah River Plant Reactors." E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co, Aiken, South Carolina. 6 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 40 of 451

STEPHEN J. EDER With S. P. Harris, P. S. Hashimoto, J. 0. Dizon, B. Sumodobila, G. M. Zaharoff, and L. J. Bragagnolo. March 1988. "Seismic Evaluation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Primary Containment System." Report prepared for Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. San Francisco: EQE Engineering.. With S. W. Swan, "Summary of the Effects of the 1985 Mexico Earthquake to Power and Industrial Facilities." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers International Conference on the 1985 Mexico Earthquake, Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, Mexico City, Mexico, September 1986. With A. F. Kabir and S. Bolourchi, "Seismic Response of Pipes Supported on Complex Framing Systems." Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Structures Congress, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1986. With S. W. Swan, "The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985; Performance of Power and Industrial Facilities," Proceedings of the Third U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Charleston, South Carolina, August 1986. "Performance of Industrial Facilities in the Mexican Earthquake of September 19, 1985," Electric Power Research Institute Report No. NP-4605, Project 1707-30 Final Report, Palo Alto, California, June 1986, also presented at the IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Mexico City, Mexico, July 1986. "Earthquake Response Analysis of a Braced Offshore Platform," University of California, Berkeley (June 1982), also American Petroleum Institute, October 1982, San Francisco, California. 7 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc. Page 41 of 451

WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, RE resources &energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer Resume*

SUMMARY

Chief Engineer with over 10 years of project retrofit, design, and management experience with WorleyParsons. Primary responsibilities included the project management, project engineering, and the overall structural engineering and design, coordination, and estimating for all types of retrofit and design projects. Tasks included structural steel design and inspection, engineering man-hour and material cost estimating, scheduling, and fabrication/erection technical support and construction field support. Responsibilities include performing as the engineering task lead for structural steel for multi-million dollar/large scale structural retrofit projects. In addition, tasks include managing the structural condition assessment services performed by the WorleyParsons' Chattanooga office. EXPERIENCE 2009 - Present Project Manager, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Oversee multi-discipline projects. Responsibilities include development, management, and execution of the project scope, schedule and budget. Typical project responsibilities include management of several concurrent projects from proposal development, to the conceptual study phase, through design implementation, and construction support. 2006 - 2009 Principal Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Alstom ECS/ Kansas City Power & Light (KCPL) - latan Generating Station Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Project, Alstom Project Partnership. Task lead overseeing engineering and design of ductwork, new support structures and the reinforcement of the existing support structure to accommodate the SCR retrofit project. Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, foundations and other miscellaneous structural projects associated with the SCR project. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted man hours and schedule. Review and approval shop fabrication and detailed drawings for structural steel and ductwork. Facilitate all communications between the Chattanooga and Knoxville offices as well as provide estimating and scheduling for all current and future projects, optional design arrangements, and engineering studies. Conduct several site visits to determine the construction feasibility of present and future projects as well as to investigate and propose alternative arrangement options for the support of the SCR system. Alstom Performance Projects - Miscellaneous Projects. Task lead overseeing engineering and design of several miscellaneous structural steel, ductwork, and fossil projects. Responsibilities include originating and reviewing calculations for structural steel, ductwork, and other structural projects associated with fossil sites. Responsible for overseeing other structural engineers and structural designers in order to facilitate the design drawings with respect to the budgeted manhours and schedule. Projects include: 

                          = Lamma Low NOx Ductwork Installation and Structural Steel Modifications Desota Low NOx Ductwork Installation
                          > Dominion Generation Chesterfield Station Furnace Buckstay Upgrade Study 2007 - Present             Condition Assessment Services Team Leader, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee In addition to senior structural engineering activities, additional responsibilities include coordinating and leading condition assessment inspections at fossil power plants. The Chattanooga inspection 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033                                 Corporate Base                                                  Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09)

EcoNomics Page 42 of 451

ril WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer 

            .....     *.....      ~              ....                                                                     Resume group consists of 16 civil/structural engineers who performed condition assessment inspections throughout the U.S. for several different utility companies.

Coordinating responsibilities include estimating and scheduling manpower, developing a detailed inspection criteria, also evaluating and documenting the existing conditions of the respective component during the inspection. Post-inspection responsibilities include formalizing inspection findings, formulating necessary modifications and reinforcements, outlining future recommendations and inspection plans, reviewing the findings of team members, and executing any subsequent structural engineering tasks or engineering studies. Typical inspections include: Air and flue gas ductwork (internal and external) Circulating cooling water tunnels Coal handling bins, Chimneys and stacks, complete interior and exterior inspection Boiler internals and pressure vessels Furnace stiffening systems Miscellaneous structural systems at a typical fossil site Responsible Engineer, TVA Project Partnership Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Project Partnership. Project lead overseeing multi-discipline projects. Responsibilities include role as the technical lead for the multi-discipline effort as well as the point of contact between all engineers, designers, vendors, suppliers, and TVA management. Tasks include technical review of engineering and design, perform documentation of modifications, monitor allocation and utilization of estimated budget, and presentation of design proposals, progress, and construction planning to plant and construction management. Projects include: Cumberland Fossil SCR Hopper and LPA Screen Installation and Existing Steel Modifications Multi-site TVA Chimney Structural Review and Reinforcement Project TVA Fossil Power Plants Condition Assessment Inspections CPS Energy - Braunig Peaker Project (Combustion Turbine). Responsibilities include the design of several new and retrofitted structures and new equipment foundations. Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and serviceability of the new structures and foundations associated with the new combustion turbine project. 2005 - 2006 Structural Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) - Roxboro Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). Responsibilities include the design of large ductwork and their support structures. Duties focus on designing the structural integrity, support measures, and thermal expansion characteristics for large ductwork associated with the new FGD system. In addition, responsibilities include designing the support steel and foundations for the FGD ductwork support structures. Progress Energy Carolinas (PGNC) - Mayo Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD). In anticipation of future FGD project, conducted internal duct inspection for the Unit 1 ductwork at PGNC's Mayo plant site and provided report evaluating the condition of the ductwork and its structural components and recommending repairs. Alstom (Chattanooga) - TXU Oak Grove Hot Air Duct to Mills (New Boiler). Structural engineer for the design of the Hot Air Duct to the Mills for a new boiler construction project. Performed structural analysis of ductwork and support measures in addition to specifying metal expansion 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 43 of 451

rii WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer 

                              -,....                            .                    >Re                                      umeý joints. Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort.

TVA. Responsible for several miscellaneous structural engineering projects involving structural steel design, duct design and analysis and design of retaining wall structures for both fossil and hydro power plants. Other responsibilities included providing technical support and temporary structure design to help facilitate construction efforts during plant modification projects. In addition, responsibilities include internal structural inspections for circulating cooling water tunnel systems. 2001 - 2005 Structural Engineer, Alstom Power, Chattanooga, Tennessee East Kentucky Power - Spurlock No. 1, SCR Project. Responsibilities included the structural design of SCR ductwork, specification of fabric expansion joints, and slide gate and louver dampers. Provided subcontracted consulting engineering firm with ductwork-applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort. Tucson Electric - Springerville Units I and 2 LowNOx Retrofit Project. Responsible for overall layout and design of ductwork, structural steel, SOFA, air registers, access platforms, and modifications to the existing ductwork. In addition, preformed structural analysis of existing support steel and provided details to reinforce the structure. Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including Platte River, Lower River Colorado Authorities, TXU, PacificCorp, and Kentucky Utilities. Mobile Energy Service Corporation - Power Boiler No. 9, Furnace Explosion Rehabilitation Project. Structural engineer for the inspection of damaged boiler structural steel, access platforms, and furnace stiffeners. Produced inspection reports, design sketches, condition assessments, and material estimates to customer for required modifications/reinforcement and/or replacement of damaged steel. Dominion Generation - Chesterfield Unit 5, Secondary Air Duct Modifications. Structural engineer for the design of modifications to the secondary air duct stiffener framing, supports, and guides to accommodate the installation of new duct openings and new expansion joint placement. Specified new fabric expansion joints and provided detailed sketches for construction. Provided OEM with ductwork applied loading drawings to facilitate the structural steel and foundation design effort. Dominion Generation - Chesterfield No. 6, Ductwork and Furnace Upgrade Study. Conducted structural analysis of existing boiler framing and flue gas ductwork systems for FD/ID fan pressure upgrades. Additional responsibilities included secondary site inspections to determine the construction sequencing and identify potential design changes of new ductwork/boiler framing modifications. Performed same responsiblities for projects with customers including TXU, Exelon, and Indianapolis Power and Light. Dominion Generation - Chesterfield No. 6, Ash Handling Tank Support Steel. Designed new support structure for an ash handling tank and equipment for the Economizer hopper. Evaluated the existing structural steel and provided detailed modifications to reinforce the existing structure effected by the new steel and equipment. EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2001 Pursuing a Masters in Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 2003 - Present 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-003"3 Corporate Base Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 44 of 451

WorleyParsons James P. Edgar, P.E resources &energy Chief Civil/Structural Engineer

"* :*.*:.. :* ::*i .. . : ... *:::..":... : :*.** ..:: *:'.
                                                   .........                  ".. .. .;; . ' ::T.... ... * *: * ':   " ' *...           .......

S,.Resume REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Engineer - Tennessee, No.112009, 2008 One Way Element Leader, Element 9 Management of Change Member, AISC, ASCE Confined Space and Fall Protection Trained Member, STAAD User Group Wood Design CED Certified PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS ASCE Duct Design 2008 Structural Department Presentation Duct Inspection Procedures 2008 Structural Department Presentation Beam and Column Reinforcing Procedures 2008 Group Presentation ASCE Wind Design Structures and Ducts 2007 Group Presentation SCR Systems 2005 Structural Department Presentation SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES. Doer-Seller Account Planning, 2010 Frontline Leadership Program, 2009 Prestressing Concrete (UTK) - Properties of prestressing materials; methods of pre-tensioning and post-tensioning; and analysis and design of simple and continuous beams and slabs Behavior of Steel Structures (UTK) - Focused on the design of beams, columns, beam-columns, connections, bracing, tension members, and the interpretation of the ASD and LRFD specifications. Statically Indeterminate Structures (UTC) - Analysis of frames, trusses, columns, and continuous beams by force methods and slope deflection. Analysis of Plates and Shells (UTC) - Bending and buckling of plates and shells and non-linear analysis of cables and cable roof structures. Computer Skills: STAADPro 2004 AutoCAD: 2000, 2004. MicroStation Frameworks MathCAD Microsoft Office AWARDS Nominee for Eastern Operations People Development Award 2010 Eastern Operations Civil/Structural Engineer of the Year, 2008 002-O00-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate, Base Page 4 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomicS Page 45 of 451

WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E. resources &energy Senior Supervising Engineer Resume:

SUMMARY

Senior Supervising Engineer with over nineteen years of industry experience including stress analysis using Caesar II per AMSE B31 codes including both static and dynamic analysis, pipe support design, pipe material, and valve specifications for carbon steel, alloy steel, and fiber' reinforced plastics (FRP); and FRP pipe and tank design per NBS PS15-69, AMSE B31, and RTP-1. Experienced using Cameron Hydraulic and Crane 410 for pump calculations. Worked as project engineer with projects ranging in size from $14 Million to $120 Million. Department manager responsible for both designers and engineers ranging from 25-33 staff members. Experienced in Pulp and Paper, Chemical, and Power Industries. EXPERIENCE 2010 - Present Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) - Cholla Unit 2 Air Quality Control (AQC) Systems Project. Perform duties of the Owners Engineering Project Engineer on $120 MM baghouse and scrubber upgrade project including managing owners engineering resources to complete project procurement specifications for the installation of a new baghouse and retrofitting the existing Research-Cotrell scrubber to an open spray tower design. APS - Capital Budget Items. Lead a twelve-member multidiscipline team of engineers to develop Capital Budget Item packages for 40 projects to support the development of APS' 2012 capital spending plan. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Sequoyah Fire Protection Pipe Support Project. Duties as Responsible Engineer include verification of quality-related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client. TVA - Watts Bar Unit 2 Project. Duties include Verification of Class I safety related pipe support calculations and coordination of calculation packages to be issued to the client. 2010 Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Department of Energy - Savannah River Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Duties included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3. Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic. Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant. 2009 Senior Supervising Engineer, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Florida Power and Light Projects. Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using AutoPIPE XM on boiler drain, attemperator spray, extraction steam, and condensate piping. Designed pipe supports for water circulation project using high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping above ground. Performed engineering calculations for span and thermal expansion. Developed proposals for projects including both stress analysis and support design. Helped to refine WorleyParsons of Chattanooga's method for performing man-hour estimates for both stress analysis and pipe support design. 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 46 of 451

WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E. resources &energy Senior Supervising Engineer 

                                                          ....   ..                                                   Resume 2008                      Senior Pipe Stress Engineer, Parsons Infrastructure, Aiken, South Carolina Duties as Pipe Stress Engineer included performing pipe stress analysis using Caesar II on both PC-1 and PC-3 systems per B31.3. Analysis included seismic analysis, both static and dynamic.

Also designed pipe supports using SmartPlant. 2007 - 2008 Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, ALSTOM Power, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (33 engineers) included maintaining manpower database and work assignments, and insuring that mechanical activities are completed on time and to budget. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and front-end engineering (FEE) to support development of the project estimate. Coordinated the development of a Piping Group within the Mechanical Engineering Department. The group consisted of a Principal Piping Engineer and six support engineers. Developed training plan to bring new engineers up-to-speed on piping engineering including stress analysis, pipe supports, and pump calculations. PSEG - Mercer and Hudson Back-end Technology (BET) Projects. Project engineer for projects estimated at $70 million each in Alstom scope. Oversaw all aspects of work, which included managing the schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordinating multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews. Also facilitated all vendor meetings and responded to both field and vendor requests for information. 2005 - 2007 Department Manager, Mechanical Engineering, Mesa Associates, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Duties as Department Manager (25 designers and engineers) included maintaining manpower database, work assignments, and insuring that multi-discipline oversight is maintained on all projects. Responsible for training new engineers in the use of Caesar I1. Also responsible for proposal development efforts on large projects including man-hour estimates, and FEE to support development of the project estimate. Performed stress analysis with Caesar II of package boiler steam and condensate piping per ASME B31.3 and boiler feed water piping per ASME B31.1. Included determining support location and selection. Huber Industries Waste Water Treatment Project. Project engineer on multiple projects including a wastewater treatment facility project estimated at $14 Million installed cost. Responsible for equipment selection and evaluation, development of process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID), management of schedule and deliverables, interfacing with the Client's project team, and coordination of multi-discipline activities such as weekly meetings and design reviews. 2001 - 2005 Senior Mechanical Engineer - ALSTOM Power, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee Design lead for environmental control system projects on the following fossil power plants: D- TVA - Cumberland, Kingston, Widows Creek, and Bull Run Plants v- Duke Power- Marshall, Cliffside, and Belews Creek Plant D Edison Power- Homer City Plant 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) GcNomics Page 47 of 451

E WorleyParsons Michael Gordon, P.E. Senior Supervising Engineer resources &energy 

                                  * ." *..!* . ......
                                                * ........... .. * ..*.*.
                                                                      * ...                  ' :? .:.: . "*  .          ~ ....
                                                                                                                   . . ....
                                                                                                                     -        Resume R
                                                                                                                            ...e um Duties included:

t- Supporting the development of the project schedule, man-hour estimates, requesting staff as needed, writing equipment specifications, preparing bid evaluations, performing reviews of vendor engineering, and helping resolve questions from the erector. 

                          >    Performing stress analysis of hot air systems (700 OF) per SMACNA Round Duct Specification, FRP piping per ASME B31.1 and NBS PS 15-69 for limestone slurry systems, and steam piping per ASME B31.1 using both Caesar II and hand calculations. Included the development of support arrangements and movements for the purchase of expansion joints.

t Developing standard piping and valve specifications. Established method for performing stress analysis for fiberglass reinforced piping, and facilitated in-house training for piping designers. Also developed standard pipe support details to be used in piping design. 2000 - 2001 Design Engineer IV,Washington Group International, Birmingham, Alabama Corning Fiber Optic Plant. Designed various piping systems for industrial process facility using Microstation PDS 3D software. 1992 - 2000 Design Engineer II, BE & K Engineering, Birmingham, Alabama P- Piping design using PDMS, MicroStation, and AutoCAD. Duties included piping design, P&ID development, and 3D design of various types of process equipment and piping. Also experienced with Digital Photogrammetry. Most projects included pulp and paper and chemical process. p- Piping engineering included stress analysis of both FRP and carbon/alloy steel piping systems using Caesar I1. Included the analysis of steam piping, stock piping, and various other services. Duties also included determining pipe support location and types. Pump calculations performed using Cameron Hydraulics, Crane 410, and in-house developed program. Other duties included line sizing and PDMS catalog and specification development. EDUCATION B.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Completed a Transfer Program in Pre-engineering, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Professional Registered Engineer, Tennessee SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE/SPECIALIST COURSES Piping Design using PDMS, PDS, Microstation, and AutoCAD* Bullet Proof Management by Crestcom, 2006 Nuclear Training for Un-escorted Badge, TVA, 1995 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 48 of 451

William E Sprinkle, Jr. Manager Nuclear Plant Shift Operations Watts Bar Nuclear 

   "  Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at WBN in 2008 (License No 22066)
  • Qualified Shift Manager at WBN in 2010
  • Currently filling position of Operations Support Superintendent.

Previous experience: 

   "  Licensed Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 1995 - 2001
   "  Licensed Senior Reactor Operator at Arkansas Nuclear One from 2001 - 2005 Page 49 of 451

WorleyParsons Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources &energy Structural Engineer 

          =~. ~~~~~~~~. ..... "." " .    ' .... ... .....
                                                       ... ...  : :.... .             . . .. .. *. ... ....... ":
                                                                                                               *... .. ........
                                                                                                                           ....
                                                                                                                              ... Resume m "

SUMMARY

Structural Engineer with five years of experience with WorleyParsons. Experience includes engineering and design of ductwork, duct support structures, foundations and retrofit, modification, and re-design of existing structures. Experienced in managing multiple responsibilities in engineering delivery including the completion of calculation packages, design sketches, drawing mark-ups, final drawing reviews, budget proposals, and project meetings. Familiar with current code provisions, including but not limited to, AISC Steel Construction Manual, ACI 318 Building Code and Commentary, ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, and IBC (International Building Code). Familiar with current analysis and design software, which includes STAAD Pro, PCA Column, L-Pile, AutoCAD, SmartPlant Review, and other tools such as Microsoft Excel and MathCAD. EXPERIENCE 2007 - Present Structural Engineer II,WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee. Qualification of new and existing nuclear fire protection pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe support components, such as struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections. Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software. Software includes FAPPS (ME1 50), BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DCA (Drawing Change Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support configurations and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2, 1200 MW Unit, Spring City, Tennessee. Qualification of existing nuclear pipe supports for new loading conditions, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Design of modifications to existing pipe supports as required in order to meet specifications. Qualification and specification of both existing and new pipe supports components, such as snubbers, struts, clamps, and anchors. Qualification and design of non-standard welded connections. Pipe supports qualified using computer modeling, utilizing TVA supplied software. Software includes FAPPS (ME150), BASEPLATE II (ME035), MAPPS (ME153), CONAN, and lAP. Creation of supporting calculation packages utilizing MathCAD, Microsoft Excel and Word. Responsible for design input and verification of DRA (Drawing Revision Authorization), which serves as the working document for required pipe support modifications and final support drawings to be issued into the TVA database. Other responsibilities include checking and verification of pipe support calculation packages prior to issuance and coordination between multiple offices to ensure quality, completeness, and consistency. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) - Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Avila Beach, California. Qualification of existing transformer foundations for seismic loading, following appropriate design criteria, code provisions, and NRC requirements. Design and qualification of transformer anchorage. Creation of supporting design calculation packages and sketches. Georgia Power Company - Plant Scherer Units I and 2 (Booster Fan Outlet Ducts). Computer modeling, analysis, and design of pile cap foundations. Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches. Review of final foundation drawings. 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcaNomics Page 50 of 451

IUJ WorleyParsons resources & energy Travis J. Hockenberry, Structural Engineer PE 

 ... . . . . . . . . .    . ... * . ............                          ...                           . . . . . . .. ..
                                                                                                                        . .. .... ... ... . .... ...... Resume.
                                                                                                                                                        . . ....

CPS Energy - Braunig Peaking Turbines Project. Computer modeling, analysis, and design of both soil and pile supported mat foundations. Analysis and design of small equipment foundations. Analysis and design of transformer containments and firewalls. Analysis and design of tank ring-wall foundations. Computer modeling, analysis, and design of steel pipe bridge and supporting foundations. Creation of supporting calculation packages and design sketches. Interfacing with client at design review meetings, updating project schedule, attending weekly meetings, review of final design drawings, and field support. Alstom, Pacificorp - Ductwork Pressure Upgrade Study. Computer modeling and analysis of existing ductwork for increased pressure loads. Design of necessary modifications to existing ductwork and supports. Creation of calculation package, design sketches, and final study report issued to client. Alstom - Salt River Project, SOFA Upgrade for the Navajo Generating Station. Computer modeling of SOFA ductwork and new support steel. Analysis and design of ductwork and verification of results. Analysis of existing structural steel for additional load, which included modeling the existing structural steel. Design of necessary modifications to existing structural steel. Analysis of existing furnace buckstays for new load configuration and design of necessary modifications for inadequate members. Re-design of existing furnace guide for new location and loading. Creation of calculation package and design sketches. Georgia Power Company - Plant Scherer Unit 4. Design steel support structure and pile cap foundations for ductwork. Responsibilities include computer modeling of support structure and ductwork. Analysis and design of support structure and verification of modeling results. Determination of pile loads. Analysis and design of pile cap foundations. Preparation of design sketches. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Bull Run Fossil Plant. Retrofit of existing handling facility weather enclosure. Responsibilities include computer modeling of existing weather enclosure. Verify need for modification to existing structure and propose and design modification to meet code requirements. Prepare design calculations and drawings. TVA - Cumberland Fossil Plant. LPA screen assembly and hopper addition. Responsibilities include verification of existing structural steel for additional load due to ash hopper and large particle ash (LPA) screen assembly. Design necessary modifications and prepare calculation package. TVA - Allen, Colbert, Cumberland, Widows Creek, and Paradise Fossil Plants. Foundation design and analysis. Responsibilities include analysis and design of concrete foundations for ammonia handling weather enclosures. Preparation of design calculations and design sketches. TVA - Cherokee Hydroelectric. Switchyard transformer replacement, bus support upgrade, and foundation modifications. Responsibilities include analysis and design of steel bus support structure, including modeling of structure and determination of loading. Verification and analysis of existing concrete foundations for new loading. Design of replacement foundations and modifications to existing foundations. Preparation of design calculations and design sketches. 2005 - 2007 Graduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the shear behavior of fiber reinforced concrete beams. Design and fabrication of 42 reinforced concrete beams with variations in geometry and reinforcement detail. Research aimed at determining the effects of combining steel fiber reinforcement with conventional transverse reinforcement. 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 2 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 51 of 451

WorleyParsons Travis J. Hockenberry, PE resources & energy Structural Engineer Resume Teaching Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Prepared and presented lectures and tutorials for Steel and Concrete Member Design. Assisted students with course work as well as exam preparation. Prepared lab exercises for civil engineering surveying. Responsible for four sections of approximately 25 students. 2004-2005 Undergraduate Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Conducted research on the flexural behavior of fiber reinforced concrete. Designed and machined custom loading setup for specialized four-point bending tests. Fabricated and tested 120 concrete specimens, which included four-point bending, compression, and split tensile tests. Analyzed data obtained from testing. Co-authored publication, resulting from the research. EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2007 B.S., Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2005 REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Member of AISC, American Institute of Steel Construction Professional Engineer, State of Pennsylvania (PE078696) PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS "Evaluation of Shear Capacity of Hooked Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with Stirrups," Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, , 2007. Co-author, "Enhanced Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Low Volume Fractions," Indo-U.S. Conference Proceedings, Chennai, India, 2005. 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 3 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 52 of 451

Phillip W. York, E.I.T. 

  *WorleyParsons                                                                       Structural Engineering Associate resources &energy Resume

SUMMARY

Structural Engineering Associate with over three years of experience in the structural and civil engineering fields including pipe support systems analysis and structural design. EXPERIENCEE 2010 - Present Structural Engineering Associate, WorleyParsons, Chattanooga, Tennessee Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) - Brown's Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Athens, Alabama. Assisted in identifying and locating electrical panels and components for cable identification in all fire safety related systems. TVA - Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, Spring City, Tennessee. Conducted field walkdowns of piping layout and supports. TVA- Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Hollywood, Alabama. Originated engineering analysis of pipe support systems including baseplates, structural steel, anchor bolts, welds, vendor components, and integral attachments. 2011 Civil Engineer, Atwell Group, Charleston, Tennessee Verified field accuracy and installation of storm sewers and sewer structures compared with designed drawings. 2008 - 2009 Structural Engineer, March Adams & Associates, Chattanooga, Tennessee Assisted on structural design and site planning of engineering projects including a precast concrete bridge, apartment complexes, and various industrial sites. 2007 - 2008 Dam SafetylRiver Operations Intern, TVA, Chattanooga, Tennessee Programmed proprietary database to accept decades of instrumentation data from hydroelectric plants and to calculate along predetermined parameters. EDUCATION B.S., Engineering (Civil Concentration), University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, Tennessee, 2008 REGISTRATIONSIAFFILIATIONS Engineer-in-Training, State of Tennessee, License #26776 SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AutoCAD, 2D and 3D Drafting SolidWorks, 2D and 3D Drafting STAAD.Pro, Structural Analysis and Design RISA, 2D and 3D Structural Analysis 002-000-CPF-016 (007848) HRF-0033 Corporate Base Page 1 Rev 6 (03-Feb-09) EcoNomics Page 53 of 451

Appendix B: Base List 1 This Appendix includes the Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1. Page 54 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ___________________________ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Function 1 0-ACUM-032-0060A-A AUX CNT AIR COMP ACC TNK 0 2 0-ACUM-032-0086B-B AUX CNT AIR COMP ACC TNK 0 3 0-AHU-031-0012 MAIN CONTROL ROOM AHU A-A 5 4 0-AHU-031-011 MAIN CONTROL ROOM AHU B-B 5 5 O-AHU-031-030B EL 692.0 ELEC BOARD ROOM AHU A-A 5 6 0-AHU-031-030D EL 692.0 ELEC BOARD ROOM AHU B-A 5 7 O-AHU-031-0497 COMPUTER RM SUPPLEMENTAL AHU 1 5 8 0-AHU-031-0498 COMPUTER RM SUPPLEMENTAL AHU 2 5 9 0-AHU-031-31B EL 692.0 ELEC BD RM AHU C-B 5 10 0-AHU-031-31D EL 692.0 ELEC BD RM AHU D-B 5 11 0-AHU-031-45 SHUTDOWN BD ROOM A AHU A-A 5 12 0-AHU-031-55 SHUTDOWN BD ROOM A AHU C-B 5 13 0-AHU-031-61 SHUTDOWN BD RM B AHU D-B 5 14 O-BAT-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BATTERY I 0 15 O-BAT-236-0002-E 125V VITAL BATTERY II 0 16 0-BAT-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BATTERY III 0 17 0-BAT-236-0004-G 125V VITAL BATTERY IV 0 18 0-BD-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BATTERY BD I 0 19 O-BD-236-0002-E 125V VITAL BATTERY BD II 0 20 0-BD-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BATTERY BD III 0 21 0-BD-236-0004-G 125V VITAL BATTERY BD IV 0 22 O-CHGR-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER I 0 23 0-CHGR-236-0002-E 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER II 0 24 0-CHGR-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER III 0 25 0-CHGR-236-0004-G 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER IV 0 26 0-CHGR-236-0006-S 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER 6-S 0 27 O-CHGR-236-0007-S 125V VITAL BTRY CHARGER 7-S 0 28 0-CHR-031-0080 MAIN CONTROL ROOM CHILLER PKG A-A 5 29 0-CHR-031-0096 MAIN CONTROL ROOM CHILLER PKG B-B 5 30 0-CHR-031-0128 EL 692.0 ELEC BOARD ROOM CHILLER PKG A-A 5 31 0-CHR-031-0129 EL 692.0 ELEC BOARD ROOM CHILLER PKG B-B 5 32 0-CHR-031-36/2 SHUTDOWN BD ROOMS A&B CHILLER PKG A-A 5 33 0-CHR-031-49/2 SHUTDOWN BD ROOMS A&B CHILLER PKG B-B 5 Page 55 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 34 0-COMP-032-0060 AUX CNTL AIR COMPRES A-A 0 35 0-COMP-032-0086 AUX CNTL AIR COMPRES B-B 0 36 0-CRV-271-A1 REFUEL FLOOR CRANE 0 37 0-DPL-236-0001-D 125V VITAL BTRY BD I DISTRIBUTION PANEL 0 38 O-DPL-236-0002-E 125V VITAL BTRY BD II DISTRIBUTION PANEL 0 39 O-DPL-236-0003-F 125V VITAL BTRY BD III DISTRIBUTION PANE 0 40 O-DPL-236-0004-G 125V VITAL BTRY BD IV DISTRIBUTION PANEL 0 41 0-DRYR-032-0074 ESSNT CON AIR TRAN A DRYR 2 0 42 O-DRYR-032-0075 ESSNT CON AIR TRAN A DRYR 1 0 43 O-DRYR-032-0099 ESSNT CON AIR TRAN B DRYR 2 0 44 O-DRYR-032-0100 ESSNT CON AIR TRAN B DRYR 1 0 45 0-FAN-031-27 CONTROL BLDG BTRY RM EXHAUST FAN C-B 5 46 0-FAN-031-28 CONTROL BLDG BTRY RM EXHAUST FAN A-A 5 47 0-FAN-031-29 CONTROL BLDG BTRY RM EXHAUST FAN B-B 5 48 0-FCO-031-002 PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 49 0-FCO-031-002A PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 50 0-FCO-031-003 PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 51 0-FCO-031-004 PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 52 0-FCO-031-1 PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 53 0-FCO-031-11 MCR AHU B-B ISOLATION DAMPER 5 54 0-FCO-031-12 MCR AHU A-A ISOLATION DAMPER 5 55 0-FCO-031-13 BTRY RM EXH FAN TORNADO DAMPER 5 56 0-FCO-031-14 BTRY RM EXH FAN TORNADO DAMPER 5 57 0-FCO-031-1A PRESS AIR ISOLATION DAMPER 5 58 0-FCO-031-23 BTRY RM EXH FAN C-B TORNADO DAMPER 5 59 0-FCO-031-24 BTRY RM EXH FAN C-B TORNADO DAMPER 5 60 0-FCO-031-27 BTRY RM EXH FAN C-B ISOLATION DAMPER 5 61 0-FCO-031-28 BTRY RM EXH FAN A-A ISOLATION DAMPER 5 62 0-FCO-031-29 BTRY RM EXH FAN B-B ISOLATION DAMPER 5 63 0-FCO-031-30 EL 692.0 ELEC BD RM AHU ISOLATION DAMPER 5 64 0-FCO-031-31 EL 692.0 ELEC BD RM AHU ISOLATION DAMPER 5 65 0-FCO-031-32 PRESS AIR TORNADO DAMPER 5 66 0-FCO-031-33 PRESS AIR TORNADO DAMPER 5 Page 56 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 67 0-FCO-031-335 EBR AHU A-A MODULATING DAMPER 5 68 0-FCO-031-336 EBR AHU B-A MODULATING DAMPER 5 69 0-FCO-031-337 EBR AHU C-B MODULATING DAMPER 5 70 0-FCO-031-34 PRESS AIR TORNADO DAMPER 5 71 0-FCO-031-35 PRESS AIR TORNADO DAMPER 5 72 0-FCO-031-82 MCR AHU A-A MODULATING DAMPER 5 73 0-FCO-031-91 MCR AHU B-B MODULATING DAMPER 5 74 0-FCV-032-82-A ACAS COMPRESSOR A-A, ACAS ISOLATION 0 75 0-FCV-032-85-B ACAS COMPRESSOR B-B, ACAS ISOLATION 0 76 0-FCV-067-0144 CCS HTX OUTLET 0 77 0-FCV-067-0151 CCS HTX OUTLET 0 78 0-FCV-067-0152 CCS HTX C DISCH CONTROL VLV 0 79 0-FCV-070-0140 RC PUMP OIL CLR HDR CONT ISOL VALVE 0,5 80 0-FLTR-032-0060A-A AUX CNTL AIR COMP INTK FLTR 0 81 0-FLTR-032-0076 ESSNT CON AIR TRN A AFT-FLTR 0 82 0-FLTR-032-0086B-B AUX CNTL AIR COMP INTK FLTR 0 83 0-FLTR-032-0101 ESSNT CON AIR TRN B AFT-FLTR 0 84 0-FS-031-117A ELEC BD RM AHU A-A AIR FLOW 5 85 0-FS-031-123-A ELEC BD RM AHU B-A AIR FLOW 5 86 0-FS-031-126-B ELEC BD RM AHU C-B AIR FLOW 5 87 0-FS-031-154-B ELEC BD RM AHU D-B AIR FLOW 5 88 0-FS-031-38-A SHUTDOWN BD RM AHU A-A AIR FLOW 5 89 0-FS-031-401-A BATTERY ROOM EL 692 EXH FAN B-B FLOW 5 90 0-FS-031-402-B BATTERY ROOM EL 692 EXH FAN A-A FLOW 5 91 0-FS-031-43-A SHUTDOWN BD RM AHU B-A AIR FLOW 5 92 0-FS-031-51-B SHUTDOWN BD RM AHU C-B AIR FLOW 5 93 0-FS-031-57-B SHUTDOWN BD RM AHU D-B AIR FLOW 5 94 0-FS-031-84-A MAIN CONTROL RM AHU A-A AIR FLOW 5 95 0-FS-031-94-B MAIN CONTROL RM AHU B-B AIR FLOW 5 96 0-FSV-032-82-A ACAS COMPRESSOR A-A, ACAS ISOLATION 0 97 0-FSV-032-85-B ACAS COMPRESSOR B-B, ACAS ISOLATION 0 98 0-HTX-032-0060A-A JAUX CNTL AIR COMP AFTRCOOL 0 99 0-HTX-032-0086B-B AUX CNTL AIR COMP AFTRCOOL 0 Page 57 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tin 100 0-HTX-070-0186 COMPONENT COOLING HX C 0 101 0-HTX-077-0096 W.GAS COMP. HTX 0 102 0-HTX-077-0111 W.GAS COMP. HTX 0 103 0-HTX-078-0031 SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER B 0 104 0-HTX-078-0032 SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER B 0 105 0-PDIS-031-101-A SHUTDOWN BD RM CW PUMP A-A DIFF PRESS 5 106 0-PDIS-031-131-B SHUTDOWN BD RM CW PUMP B-B DIFF PRESS 5 107 0-PDIS-031-161-A MAIN CONTROL ROOM CW PUMP A-A DIFF PRE 5 108 0-PDIS-031-186-B MAIN CONTROL ROOM CW PUMP B-B DIFF PRE 5 109 0-PDIS-031-211-A ELEC BD ROOM CW PUMP A-A DIFF PRESS 5 110 0-PDIS-031-241-B ELEC BD ROOM CW PUMP B-B DIFF PRESS 5 111 0-PMCL-030-192 CCS TB BSTR & SFP PUMP COOLER A-A 5 112 O-PMCL-030-193 CCS TB BSTR & SFP PUMP COOLER B-B 5 113 0-PMP-031-128/1 ELEC BD RM CHILLER PKG A-A CIR PMP A-A 5 114 O-PMP-031-129/1 ELEC BD RM CHILLER PKG B-B CIR PMP B-B 5 115 0-PMP-031-36/1 SDBR CHLR PKG A-A CW CIRC PUMP A-A 5 116 0-PMP-031-49/1 SDBR CHLR PKG B-B CW CIRC PUMP B-B 5 117 O-PMP-031-80/1 CW CIRC PMP A-A (MCR) 5 118 0-PMP-031-96/1 CW CIRC PMP B-B (MCR) 5 119 0-PMP-067-0028 ERCW PUMP A-A 0 120 0-PMP-067-0032 ERCW PUMP B-A 0 121 0-PMP-067-0036 ERCW PUMP C-A 0 122 O-PMP-067-0040 ERCW PUMP D-A 0 123 0-PMP-067-0047 ERCW PUMP E-B 0 124 O-PMP-067-0051 ERCW PUMP F-B 0 125 0-PMP-067-0055 ERCW PUMP G-B 0 126 0-PMP-067-0059 ERCW PUMP H-B 0 127 0-PMP-070-0051 CCS PUMP C-S 0 128 0-PMP-078-0012 SPENT FUEL PMP 0 129 0-PMP-087-0009 SPENT FUEL PMP 0 130 O-PNL-278-M012 RADIATION MONITORING MCR PNL 0 131 0-PNL-278-M26A D.G. 1A-A MCR PNL 0 132 0-PNL-278-M26B D.G. 1B-B MCR PNL 0 Page 58 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List I No. UNID Description Safety Function 133 O-PNL-278-M26C D.G. 2A-A MCR PNL 0 134 O-PNL-278-M26D D.G. 2B-B MCR PNL 0 135 O-PNL-278-M27A ERCW MCR PNL 0 136 0-PNL-278-M27B CCW MCR PNL 0 137 O-PS-032-62-A AUXILIARY CONTROL AIR RECEIVER A LPS 0 138 O-PS-032-62A-A AUXILIARY AIR COMPRESSOR A-A UNLOAD SW 0 139 O-PS-032-62B-A AUXILIARY AIR COMPRESSOR A-A LOAD CTL SW 0 140 O-PS-032-82-A CAS LOW PRESSURE ACAS ISOLATION 0 141 O-PS-032-85-B CAS LOW PRESSURE ACAS ISOLATION 0 142 O-PS-032-88A AUXILIARY AIR COMPRESOR B-B UNLOAD SWIT 0 143 O-PS-032-88B AUXILIARY AIR COMPRESSOR B-B 0 144 0-PS-032-88-B AUXILIARY CONTROL AIR RECEIVER B LPS 0 145 0-PT-070-0221 CCS HTX C INLET PRESSURE 0 146 0-RCVR-032-0062 ESSNT CON AIR TR A AIR RECVR 0 147 0-RCVR-032-0088 ESSNT CON AIR TR B AIR RECVR 0 148 0-SEP-031-128 AIR SEPARATOR A-(EBR) 5 149 0-SEP-031-129 AIR SEPARATOR B-(EBR) 5 150 0-SEP-031-36 SDBR CHLR PKG A-A CW AIR SEPARATOR A 5 151 0-SEP-031-49 SDBR CHLR PKG B-B CW AIR SEPARATOR B 5 152 0-SEP-031-80 AIR SEPARATOR-A-(MCR) 5 153 0-SEP-031-96 AIR SEPARATOR-B-(MCR) 5 154 O-SGEN-031-0156 ELECT BD RM AHU A-A STEAM GENERATOR 5 155 0-SGEN-031-0158 MAIN CONT RM AHU A-A STEAM GENERATOR 5 156 0-STN-031-128 STRAINER (EBR CHR A-A) 5 157 0-STN-031-129 STRAINER (EBR CHR B-B) 5 158 0-STN-031-36 STRAINER (SDBR CHR A-A) 5 159 0-STN-031-49 STRAINER (SDBR CHR B-B) 5 160 0-STN-031-80 STRAINER (MCR CHR A-A) 5 161 0-STN-031-96 STRAINER (MCR CHR B-B) 5 162 0-TANK-031-128 CHEM TREATMENT TANK A-(EBR) 5 163 0-TANK-031-129 CHEM TREATMENT TANK B-(EBR) 5 164 0-TANK-031-149 SDBR CHLR PKG B-B CW COMPRESSION TK B 5 165 0-TANK-031-175 COMPRESSION TANK A-(MCR) 5 Page 59 of 451

Watts Bar Unit I Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID _________________________________________ Function 166 0-TANK-031-200 COMPRESSION TANK B-(MCR) 5 167 0-TANK-031-225 COMPRESSION TANK A-(EBR) 5 168 0-TANK-031-255 COMPRESSION TANK B-(EBR) 5 169 0-TANK-031-36 SDBR CHLR PKG A-A CW CHEM TREATMENT TK 5 170 0-TANK-031-49 SDBR CHLR PKG B-B CW CHEM TREATMENT TK 5 171 0-TANK-031-73 SDBR CHLR PKG A-A CW COMPRESSION TK A 5 172 0-TANK-031-80 CHEM TREATMENT TANK A-(MCR) 5 173 O-TANK-031-96 CHEM TREATMENT TANK B-(MCR) 5 174 0-TC-31-82 MCR AHU A-A MODULATING DAMPER - CONTRO 5 175 0-TC-31-91 MCR AHU B-B MODULATING DAMPER - CONTRO 5 176 0-TCV-031-499 SUPPLEMENTAL AHU 1 CW TCV 5 177 0-TCV-031-500 SUPPLEMENTAL AHU 2 CW TCV 5 178 0-TCV-067-1050 REGULATING VLV EBR CHILLER A-A 0 179 0-TCV-067-1051 REGULATING VLV MCR CHILLER A-A 0 180 0-TCV-067-1052 REGULATING VLV EBR CHILLER B-B 0 181 0-TCV-067-1053 REGULATING VLV MCR CHILLER B-B 0 182 0-TE-070-0162-B CCS HEAT EXCHANGER C OUTLET TEMP 0 183 0-TS-030-192A-A SFP PUMP/TBBP SPARE CLR A-A TEMP 5 184 0-TS-030-192B-A SFT PUMP/TBBP SPARE CLR A-A TEMP 5 185 0-TS-030-193A-B SFP PUMP/TBBP SPARE CLR B-B TEMP 5 186 0-TS-030-193B-B SFP PUMP/TBBP SPARE CLR B-B TEMP 5 187 0-TS-031-150B-A ELEC BD RM AHU AA/BA SUPPLY TEMP 5 188 0-TS-031-157B-B ELEC BD RM AHU CB/DB SUPPLY TEMP 5 189 0-TS-031-40B-A SD BD ROOM AHU A-A INLET TEMP 5 190 0-TS-031-48B-A SD BD ROOM AHU B-A INLET TEMP 5 191 0-TS-031-52B-B SD BD ROOM AHU C-B INLET TEMP 5 192 0-TS-031-60B-B SB BD ROOM AHU D-B INLET TEMP 5 193 0-TS-031-88B-A MAIN CONTROL RM AHU A-A SUPPLY TEMP 5 194 0-TS-031-89B-B MAIN CONTROL RM AHU B-B SUPPLY TEMP 5 195 0-TT-031-82 MCR AHU A-A MODULATING DAMPER - THERMO 5 196 0-TT-031-91 MCR AHU B-B MODULATING DAMPER - THERMO 5 197 1-ACUM-063-0001 SIS ACCUMULATOR TANK NO 1 1,3 198 1-ACUM-063-0002 SIS ACCUMULATOR TANK NO 2 1,3 Page 60 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List I No. UNID Description Safety Function 199 1-ACUM-063-0003 SIS ACCUMULATOR TANK NO 3 1,3 200 1-ACUM-063-0004 SIS ACCUMULATOR TANK NO 4 1,3 201 1-AHU-031-461 480V BD ROOM 1A SUPPLY AHU 1A-A 5 202 1-AHU-031-475 480V BOARD ROOM 1B SUPPLY AHU 1 B-B 5 203 1-ARB-082-A-A DG 1A-A PROT. RELAY BRD 0 204 1-ARB-082-B-B DG 1B-B PROT. RELAY PNL 0 205 1-BAT-215-A-A DG 1A-A 125V BATTERY 0 206 1-BAT-215-B-B DG 1B-B 125V BATTERY 0 207 1-BD-211-A-A 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD 1A-A 0 208 1-BD-211-B-B 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD 1B-B 0 209 1-BD-212-A1-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD 1A1-A 0 210 1-BD-212-A2-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD 1A2-A 0 211 1-BD-212-B1-B 480V SHUTDOWN BD 1B1-B 0 212 1-BD-212-B2-B 480V SHUTDOWN BD 162-B 0 213 1-BD-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 1-1 0 214 1-BD-235-0002-E 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 1-11 0 215 1-BD-235-0003-F 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 1-111 0 216 1-BD-235-0004-G 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 1-IV 0 217 1-BD-237-A 120V AC INSTRU POWER DISTR PNL 1A 0 218 1-BD-237-B 120V AC INSTRU POWER DISTR PNL 1B 0 219 1-BD-278-M7A 120V AC INSTRUMENT POWER RACK 0 220 1-BD-278-M7B 120V AC INSTRUMENT POWER RACK 0 221 1-CDPL-082-A-A DG 1A-A CNTL.DIST PNL 0 222 1-CDPL-082-B-B DG 1B-B CONT. DIST PNL 0 223 1-CHGR-215-A-A DG 1A-A BATTERY CHARGER 0 224 1-CHGR-215-B-B DG 1B-B BATTERY CHARGER 0 225 1-CLR-030-186 EL 692 PENETRATION ROOM CLLER 1A-A 5 226 1-CLR-030-187 EL 692 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 1B-B 5 227 1-CLR-030-194 EL 737 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 1A-A 5 228 1-CLR-030-195 EL 737 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 1B-B 5 229 1-CLR-030-196 EL 713 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 1A-A 5 230 1-CLR-030-197 EL 713 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 1B-B 5 231 1-CLR-030-201 PIPE CHASE COOLER 1A-A 5 Page 61 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 UNID Description Safety No. ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 232 1-CLR-030-202 PIPE CHASE COOLER 1B-B 5 233 1-CMP-031-447 480V BD RM 1B RECIP COMP 1B-B 5 234 1-CMP-031-465 480V BD RM 1A RECIP COMP 1A-A 5 235 1-COND-031-289 480V BD RM 1B AIR COOLED COND 5 236 1-COND-031-290 480V BD RM 1A AIR COOLED COND 5 237 1-CRN-271-R1 175 TON POLAR CRANE 0 238 1-DEMN-062-1/1B DEMIN 3 239 1-DIEG-082-Al DIESEL ENGINE lAl 0 240 1-DIEG-082-A2 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 1A2 0 241 1-DIEG-082-B1 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 181 0 242 1-DIEG-082-B2 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 1B2 0 243 1-DOOR-061-LXXX LWR INLET DOORS (-101 THRU L124) 4 244 1-DPL-082-A-A DG 1A-A 125VDC DIST PNL 0 245 1-DPL-082-B-B DG 1B-B 125VDC DIST PNL 0 246 1-DXF-237-A INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 1A 0 247. 1-DXF-237-B INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 1B 0 248 1-FAN-030-0038-A CNTMT AIR RETURN FAN A-A 5 249 1-FAN-030-0039-B CNTMT AIR RETURN FAN B-B 5 250 1-FAN-030-0244F 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1A EXH FAN 1A1-A 5 251 1-FAN-030-0244G 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1A EXH FAN 1A2-A 5 252 1-FAN-030-0244H 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM IA EXH FAN 1A3-A 5 253 1-FAN-030-0248E 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B EXH FAN 1B1-B 5 254 1-FAN-030-0248F 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B EXH FAN 1B2-B 5 255 1-FAN-030-0248G 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B EXH FAN 1B3-B 5 256 1-FAN-030-0447-A D-G RM 1A-A EXHAUST FAN 1 5 257 1-FAN-030-0449-B D-G RM 1B-B EXHAUST FAN 1 5 258 1-FAN-030-0451-A D-G RM 1A-A EXHAUST FAN 2 5 259 1-FAN-030-0453-B D-G RM 1B-B EXHAUST FAN 2 5 260 1-FAN-030-0459-A DIESEL GEN lA-A ELECT BD ROOM EXHAUST 5 261 1-FAN-030-0461-B DIESEL GEN 1B-B ELECT BD ROOM EXHAUST 5 262 1-FAN-030-491 DIESEL PANEL 1A-A VENT FAN 5 263 1-FAN-030-493 DIESEL PANEL 1B-B VENT FAN 5 264 1-FAN-031-0285 BATTERY ROOM II EXHAUST FAN 1B1-A 5 Page 62 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID ____ ___ Description ___________________________ ___ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ___FunctFintio Safety 265 1-FAN-031-0286 BATTERY ROOM II EXHAUST FAN 1B2-B 5 266 1-FAN-031-0287 BATTERY ROOM I EXHAUST FAN 1A1-A 5 267 1-FAN-031-0288 BATTERY ROOM I EXHAUST FAN 1A2-B 5 268 1-FCO-030-0244A TRANSFORMER ROOM IA DAMPER 5 269 1-FCO-030-0244B TRANSFORMER ROOM 1A DAMPER 5 270 1-FCO-030-0248A TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B DAMPER 5 271 1-FCO-030-0248B TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B DAMPER 5 272 1-FCO-030-443 DG RM 1A-A AIR INTAKE DAMPER 5 273 2-FCO-030-445 DG RM lB-B AIR INTAKE DAMPER 5 274 1-FCO-030-447 DG RM lA-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 275 1-FCO-030-449 DG RM 1B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 276 1-FCO-030-451 DG RM 1A-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 277 1-FCO-030-453 DG RM 1B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 278 1-FCO-030-455 DG RM 1A-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 279 1-FCO-030-457 DG RM 1B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 280 1-FCO-030-459 DG 1A-A ELEC BD RM EXH FAN DAMPER 5 281 1-FCO-030-461 DG 1B-B ELEC BD RM EXH FAN DAMPER 5 282 1-FCO-031-0286 BATTERY ROOM II DAMPER FOR FAN 1B2-B 5 283 1-FCO-031-0287 BATTERY ROOM I DAMPER FOR FAN Al-A 5 284 1-FCO-031-0288 BATTERY ROOM I DAMPER FOR FAN 1A2-B 5 285 1-FCO-031-0289 BOARD ROOM CONDENSER 1B-B DAMPER 5 286 1-FCO-031-285 BATTERY ROOM II DAMPER FOR FAN 1B1-A 5 287 1-FCO-031-290 BOARD ROOM CONDENSER 1A-A DAMPER 5 288 1-FCO-031-291 480V BD RM 1A COND IA-A DAMPER 5 289 1-FCV-001-0004-T SG 1 MAIN STM HDR ISOLATION VALVE 5 290 1-FCV-001-0007-B BLOWDOWN ISOLATION VALVE SG-1 5 291 1-FCV-001-0011-T SG 2 MAIN STM HDR ISOLATION VALVE 5 292 1-FCV-001-0014-A BLOWDOWN HDR FLOW CONTROL VALVE, SG-2 5 293 1-FCV-001-0015-A TD AUX FW PMP STM SUPPLY FROM SG NO 1 4,5 294 1-FCV-001-0016-A AUX FW PMP TURB STM SUPPLY FROM SG NO 4 4,5 295 l-FCV-001-0022-T SG 3 MAIN STM HDR ISOLATION VALVE 5 296 1-FCV-001-0025-B BLOWDOWN HDR ISOLATION VALVE, SG-3 5 297 1-FCV-001-0029-T SG 4 MAIN STM HDR ISOLATION VALVE 5 Page 63 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 298 1-FCV-001-0032-A BLOWDOWN HDR FLOW CONTROL VALVE, SG-4 5 299 1-FCV-001-0051 AUX FW PMP TV 4,5 300 1-FCV-001-0052 AUX FW PMP GVB 4,5 301 1-FCV-001-0147 MSIV BYPASS 5 302 1-FCV-001-0148 MSIV BYPASS 5 303 1-FCV-001-0149 MSIV BYPASS 5 304 1-FCV-001-0150 MSIV BYPASS 5 305 1-FCV-001-0181-A BLOWDOWN ISOL VLV INSIDE CNTMT, SG-1 5 306 1-FCV-001-0182-B BLOWDOWN ISOL VLV INSIDE CNTMT, SG-2 5 307 1-FCV-001-0183-A BLOWDOWN ISOL VLV INSIDE CNTMT, SG-3 5 308 1-FCV-001-0184-B BLOWDOWN ISOL VLV INSIDE CNTMT, SG-4 5 309 1-FCV-003-0033 SG#1 FW ISOLATION VALVE 5 310 1-FCV-003-0047 STM GEN #2 ISOLATION VALVE 5 311 1-FCV-003-0087 STM GEN #3 ISOLATION VALVE 5 312 1-FCV-003-0100 STM GEN #4 FW ISOLATION VALVE 5 313 1-FCV-003-0179A ERCW HEADER B ISOLATION VALVE 4,5 314 1-FCV-003-0236 CONT ISO 5 315 1-FCV-003-0239 CONT ISO 5 316 1-FCV-003-0242 CONT ISO 5 317 1-FCV-003-0245 CONT ISO 5 318 1-FCV-003-116A AUX FEED ISOLATION VALVE 4 319 1-FCV-003-116B AUX FEED ISOLATION VALVE 4 320 1-FCV-003-126A AUX FEED ISOLATION VALVE 4 321 1-FCV-003-126B AUX FEED ISOLATION VALVE 4 322 1-FCV-003-136A ERCW HEADER A ISOLATION VALVE 4,5 323 1-FCV-003-355-A AFW PMP MINI FLOW 4 324 1-FCV-003-359-B AFW PMP MINI FLOW 4 325 1-FCV-003-563-A AFW PMP MINI FLOW 4 326 1-FCV-003-564-A AFW PMP MINI FLOW 4 327 1-FCV-003-565-A AFW PMP MINI FLOW 4 328 1-FCV-026-0240 RB STANDPIPE ISOLATION VLV 5 329 1-FCV-026-0243 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SPRAY ISOL VALVE 5 330 1-FCV-030-0007-A UPPPER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 Page 64 of 451

Watts Bar Unit I Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 331 1-FCV-030-0008-B UPPER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 332 1-FCV-030-0009-B UPPER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 333. 1-FCV-030-0010-A UPPER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 334 1-FCV-030-0014A LOWER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 335 1-FCV-030-0015-B LOWER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 336 1-FCV-030-0016-B LOWER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 337 1-FCV-030-0017-A LOWER COMPT PURGE ISOLATION VALVE 5 338 1-FCV-030-0019-B INCORE INSTR ROOM PURGE ISOLATION VALV 5 339 1-FCV-030-0020-A INCORE INSTR ROOM PURGE ISOLATION VALV 5 340 1-FCV-030-0037-B LOWER COMPT PURGE PRESS RELIEF 5 341 1-FCV-030-0040-A LOWER COMPT PURGE PRESS RELIEF 5" 342 1-FCV-030-0050 UPPER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 343 1-FCV-030-0051 UPPER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 344 1-FCV-030-0052 UPPER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 345 1-FCV-030-0053 UPPER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 346 1-FCV-030-0056 LOWER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 347 1-FCV-030-0057 LOWER CNTMT EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 348 1-FCV-030-0058 INCORE INSTR ROOM EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 349 1-FCV-030-0059 INCORE INSTR ROOM EXH ISOLATION VALVE 5 350 1-FCV-031-0305 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 351 1-FCV-031-0306 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 352 1-FCV-031-0308 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 353 1-FCV-031-0309 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 354 1-FCV-031-0326 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 355 1-FCV-031-0327 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 356 1-FCV-031-0329 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 357 1-FCV-031-0330 CONT ISOLATION VALVE 5 358 1-FCV-032-0080A ESSNT CONTR AIR CONTA ISO 5 359 1-FCV-032-0102B ESSNT CONTR AIR CONTA ISO 5 360 1-FCV-032-0110A CONTR AIR CONTA ISO 5 361 1-FCV-043-0002B PRSZR GAS SAMPL ISOL 5 362 1-FCV-043-0003A PRSZR GAS SAMPL ISOL 5 363 1-FCV-043-0011B PRSZR LIQUID SAMPL ISO 5 Page 65 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 UNID Description Safety No. ________Function 364 1-FCV-043-0012A PRSZR LIQUID SAMPL ISO 5 365 1-FCV-043-0022B HOT LEGS 1/3 SPL ISO 5 366 1-FCV-043-0023A HOT LEGS 1/3 SPL ISO 5 367 1-FCV-043-0034B ACCUM TANK SMPL HDR ISOL 5 368 1-FCV-043-0035A ACCUM TANK SMPL HDR ISOL 5 369 1-FCV-043-0055A STEAM GEN 1 DRM SPL ISO 5 370 1-FCV-043-0058A STEAM GEN 2 DRM SPL ISO 5 371 1-FCV-043-0061A STEAM GEN 3 DRM SPL ISO 5 372 1-FCV-043-0064A STEAM GEN 4 DRM SPL ISO 5 373 1-FCV-043-0201A LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 374 1-FCV-043-0202A LOCA H2 CNTMT MN OT 5 375 1-FCV-043-0207B LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 376 1-FCV-043-0208B LOCA H2 CNTMT MN OT 5 377 1-FCV-043-0433A LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 378 1-FCV-043-0434A LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 379 1-FCV-043-0435B LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 380 1-FCV-043-0436B LOCA H2 CNTMT MN IS 5 381 1-FCV-043-054D STGR 1 DRM SPL ISO 5 382 1-FCV-043-056D STGR 2 DRM SPL ISO 5 383 1-FCV-043-059D STGR 3 DRM SPL ISO 5 384 1-FCV-043-063D STGR 4 DRM SPL ISO 5 385 1-FCV-061-0096-A GLYCOL SUPPLY HEADER ISO VALVE 5 386 1-FCV-061-0097-B GLYCOL SUPPLY HEADER ISO VALVE 5 387 1-FCV-061-0110-A GLYCOL RETURN HEADER ISO VALVE 5 388 1-FCV-061-0122-B GLYCOL RETURN HEADER VALVE 5 389 1-FCV-061-0191-A GLYCOL SUPPLY C.I. 5 390 1-FCV-061-0192-B GLYCOL SUPPLY C.I. 5 391 1-FCV-061-0193-A GLYCOL FLOOR RETURN ISOLATION VALVE 5 392 1-FCV-061-0194-A GLYCOL FLOOR RETURN ISOLATION VALVE 5 393 1-FCV-062-0009 RCP 1 SEAL INJECTION ISOLATION VALVE 3 394 1-FCV-062-0022 RCP 2 SEAL INJECTION ISOLATION VALVE 3 395 1-FCV-062-0035 RCP 3 SEAL INJECTION ISOLATION VALVE 3 396 1-FCV-062-0048 RCP 4 SEAL INJECTION ISOLATION VALVE 3 Page 66 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID _________________________________________ Function 397 1-FCV-062-0061-B SEAL WATER ISOLATION VALVE 3,5 

 .398     1-FCV-062-0063-A RCP SEAL INJECTION ISOLATION VALVE                           3,5 399     1-FCV-062-0069-A RC LOOP 3 LETDOWN ISOLATION FLOW                             5,3 400     1-FCV-062-0070-A RC LOOP 3 LETDOWN ISOLATION FLOW                             5,3 401     1-FCV-062-0072-A REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE A ISOL V                        5 402     1-FCV-062-0073   REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE B ISOL V                      5,3 403     1-FCV-062-0074   REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE C ISOL V                      5,3 404     1-FCV-062-0076   LETDOWN ORIFICE ISOLATION VALVE                             5,3 405     1-FCV-062-0077   LETDOWN LINE ISOL VLV FLOW CONTROL                          5,3 406     1-FCV-062-0084   AUX PRESSURIZER SPRAY                                         2 407     1-FCV-062-0085-B NORMAL CHARGING ISOL VALVE                                    3 408     1-FCV-062-0089   SEAL REG VALVE                                              3,5 409     1-FCV-062-0090-A CHARGING HEADER ISOL VALVE                                    3 410     1-FCV-062-0090-A CHARGING HEADER ISOL VALVE                                    5 411     1-FCV-062-0091-B CHARGING FLOW ISOLATION VALVE                                 5 412     1-FCV-062-0091-B CHARGING FLOW ISOLATION VALVE                                 3 413     1-FCV-062-0093   PRZR LEVEL CONT                                               3 414     1-FCV-062-0138-B EMERGENCY BORATION FLOW CONTVLV                               3 415     1-FCV-062-1228-B BORIC ACID ISOLATION VLV                                      3 416     1-FCV-062-1229-A BORIC ACID ISOLATION VLV                                      3 417     1-FCV-063-0001-A RWST TO RHR PMP FLOW CNTL VLV                              1,3,4 418     1-FCV-063-0003-A SIS PUMP DISCHARGE TO RWST SHUTOFF VALV                     3,4 419     1-FCV-063-0004-B SIS PUMP A-A DISCH TO RWST SHUTOFF VALVE                    3,4 420     1-FCV-063-0005-B RWST TO SIS PUMP FLOW CONTROL VALVE                        1,3,4 421     1-FCV-063-0006-B SIS PUMP INLET TO CVCS CHARGING PUMP.                       3,4 422     1-FCV-063-0007-A SIS PUMP INLET TO CVCS CHARGING PUMP                        3,4 423     1-FCV-063-0008-A RHR HTX A TO CVCS CHARGING PUMPS                            3,4 424     1-FCV-063-0011-B RHR HTX B TO SIS PUMPS                                      3,4 425     1-FCV-063-0021   SIS PUMP OUTLET TO SIS TEST LINE                             5 426     1-FCV-063-0022-B SIS PUMPS COLD LEG INJECTION CONTROL VLV                    3,4 427     1-FCV-063-0023-B SIS ACCUM FILL LINE ISOLATION VALVE                          5 428     1-FCV-063-0025-B SIS CCP INJ TANK SHUTOFF VALVE                             1,3,4 429     1-FCV-063-0026-A SIS BORON INJ TANK SHUTOFF VALVE                           1,3,4 Page 67-of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 430 1-FCV-063-0047-A SIS PUMP A-A INLET VLV 1,3,4 431 1-FCV-063-0048-B SIS PUMP B-B INLET VLV 1,3,4 432 1-FCV-063-0064-A SIS ACCUM TANK N2 HDR INLET VALVE 5 433 1-FCV-063-0067-B SIS ACCUMULATOR TNK 4 FLOW ISOL VALVE 3 434 1-FCV-063-0071-A SIS CHECK VALVE FLOW ISOLATION VALVE 5 435 1-FCV-063-0072-A RHR CONTAINMENT SUMP FLOW ISOL VLV 4,3,5 436 1-FCV-063-0073-B RHR CONTAINMENT SUMP FLOW ISOL VLV 4,3,5 437 1-FCV-063-0080-A SIS ACCUMULATOR TNK 3 FLOW ISOL VALVE 3 438 1-FCV-063-0084-B SIS CHK VLV ISOL HDR FLOW ISOLATION VLV 5 439 1-FCV-063-0093-A RHR PUMP A-A DISCHARGE TO CL 2&3 1,3,4 440 1-FCV-063-0094-B RHR PUMP B-B DISCHARGE TO CL 1&4 1,3,4 441 1-FCV-063-0098-B SIS ACCUMULATOR TNK 2 FLOW ISOL VALVE 3 442 1-FCV-063-0111 SIS CHECK VLV LEAK TEST ISOLATION VALVE 5 443 1-FCV-063-0112 SIS CHECK VLV LEAK TEST ISOLATION VALVE 5 444 1-FCV-063-0118-A SIS ACCUMULATOR TNK 1 FLOW ISOL VALVE 3 445 1-FCV-063-0121 SIS FLOW TO CL CHECK VALVE TEST 5 446 1-FCV-063-0152-A SIS PUMP A-A OUTLET FLOW CONTROL VALVE 1,3,4 447 1-FCV-063-0153-B SIS PUMP B-B OUTLET FLOW CONTROL VALVE 1,3,4 448 1-FCV-063-0156-A SIS PUMP OUTLET TO RCS LP 1&3 HL 1,3,4 449 1-FCV-063-0157-B SIS PUMP OUTLET TO RCS LP 2&4 HL 1,3,4 450 1-FCV-063-0158 CONT ISO 5 451 1-FCV-063-0167 SIS PUMP OUTLET TEST LINE 5 452 1-FCV-063-0172-B RHR INJECTION OR RECIRC AFTER LOCA 3,4 453 1-FCV-063-0174 SIS TEST LINE CHECK VALVE TEST 5 454 1-FCV-063-0175-B SIS PUMP B-B DISCH TO RWST SHUTOFF VLV 3,4 455 1-FCV-063-0177 SUMP RECIRC FROM RHR TO SIP 3,4 456 1-FCV-063-0185 CONT ISO 5 457 1-FCV-067-0009A ERCW HEADER A STRAINER BACKWASH VALV 0 458 1-FCV-067-0009B ERCW HEADER A STRAINER FLUSHOUT VALVE 0 459 1-FCV-067-OO1OA ERCW HEADER B STRAINER BACKWASH VALV 0 460 1-FCV-067-0010B ERCW HEADER B STRAINER FLUSHOUT VALVE 0 461 1-FCV-067-0065 EMERG DSL HTXS BI&B2 SUP VLV FROM HDR 0 462 1-FCV-067-0068 EMERG DSL HTXS Al &A2 SUP VLV FROM HDR 0 Page 68 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 463 1-FCV-067-0083 LOWER CNTMT A COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VAL 0,5 464 1-FCV-067-0087 LWR CNTMT A CLRS DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 465 1-FCV-067-0088 LOWER CNTMT A COOLERS DISCH ISOL VALVE 0,5 466 1-FCV-067-0089 LWR CNTMT A COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 467 1-FCV-067-0091 LOWER CNTMT C COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VAL 0,5 468 1-FCV-067-0095 LWR CNTMT C CLRS DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 469 1-FCV-067-0096 LOWER CNTMT C COOLERS DISCH ISOL VALV 0,5 470 1-FCV-067-0097 LWR CNTMT C COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 471 1-FCV-067-0099 LOWER CNTMT B COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VAL 0,5 472 1-FCV-067-0103 LWR CNTMT B CLRS DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 473 1-FCV-067-0104 LOWER CNTMT B COOLERS DISCH ISOL VALVE 0,5 474. 1-FCV-067-0105 LWR CNTMT B COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 475 1-FCV-067-0107 LOWER CNTMT D COOLERS SUPPLY ISOL VAL 0,5 476 1-FCV-067-0111 LWR CNTMT D CLRS DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 477 1-FCV-067-0112 LOWER CNTMT D COOLERS DISCH ISOL VALV 0,5 478 1-FCV-067-0113 LWR CNTMT D CLRS SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 479 1-FCV-067-0123 CNTMT SPRAY HTX B SUPPLY CONTROL VALV 0,5 480 1-FCV-067-0124 CONTAINMENT SPRAY HTX B DISCHARGE VAL 0,5 481 1-FCV-067-0125 CNTMT SPRAY HTX A SUPPLY CONTROL VALV 0,5 482 1-FCV-067-0126 CONTAINMENT SPRAY HTX A DISCHARGE VAL 0,5 483 1-FCV-067-0130 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR A SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 484 1-FCV-067-0131 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR A DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 485 1-FCV-067-0133 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR C Supply ISOL VLV 0,5 486 1-FCV-067-0134 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR C DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 487 1-FCV-067-0138 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR B SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 488 1-FCV-067-0139 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR B DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 489 1-FCV-067-0141 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR D SUPPLY ISOL VLV 0,5 490 1-FCV-067-0142 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR D DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 491 1-FCV-067-0143 CCS HTX OUTLET 0 492 1-FCV-067-0176 SIS PUMP RM CLR SUPPLY CNTL VLV 0 493 1-FCV-067-0182 SIS PUMP RM CLR SUPPLY CNTL VLV 0 494 1-FCV-067-0184 CS PUMP RM CLR SUPPLY CNTL VLV 0 495 1-FCV-067-0186 CS PUMP RM CLR SUPPLY CNTL VLV 0 Page 69 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 496 1-FCV-067-0295 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR A DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 497 1-FCV-067-0296 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR C DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 498 1-FCV-067-0297 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR B DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 499 1-FCV-067-0298 UPPER CNTMT VENT CLR D DISCH ISOL VLV 0,5 500 1-FCV-067-162 CCS PMP & AUX FW PMP AREA CLR A-A 0,5 501 1-FCV-067-164 CCS PMP & AUX FW PMP AREA CLR B-B 0,5 502 1-FCV-067-213 SFP PIT PMP &TB BOOSTER PMP AREA CLR A- 0,5 503 1-FCV-067-215 SFP PIT PMP &TB BOOSTER PMP AREA CLR B- 0,5 504 1-FCV-067-342 PIPE CHASE CLR 1A-A 0,5 505 1-FCV-067-344 PIPE CHASE CLR 1B-B 0,5 506 1-FCV-067-346 EL 692 PEN RM CLR 1A-A 0,5 507 1-FCV-067-348 EL 692 PEN RM CLR 1B-B 0,5 508 1-FCV-067-350 EL 713 PEN RM CLR 1A-A 0,5 509 1-FCV-067-352 EL 713 PEN RM CLR 1B-B 0,5 510 1-FCV-067-354 EL 737 PEN RM CLR 1A-A 0,5 511 1-FCV-067-356 EL 737 PEN RM CLR 1B-B 0,5 512 1-FCV-068-0305-A RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS N2 MAN TO PRT 5 513 1-FCV-068-0307-A RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS GA TO PRT 5 514 1-FCV-068-0308-B RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS GA TO PRT 5 515 1-FCV-068-0332 PORV BLOCK VALVE 2,4 516 1-FCV-068-0332-B RCS PRESSURIZER RELIEF FLOW CTRL VALVE 2 517 1-FCV-068-0333 PORV BLOCK VALVE 2,4 518 1-FCV-068-0333-A RCS PRESSURIZER RELIEF FLOW CTRL VALVE 2 519 1-FCV-070-0066 CCS SURGE TANK VENT VALVE 0 520 1-FCV-070-0085 EXCESS LETDOWN HTX OUTLET VALVE 5 521 1-FCV-070-0087 RC PUMP THERM BARRIER RET CNTNMT ISOL 0,5 522 1-FCV-070-0089 RC PUMP OIL CLR RET CNTNMT ISOL VALVE 0,5 523 1-FCV-070-0090 RC PUMP THERM BARRIER RET CNTNMT ISOL 0,5 524 1-FCV-070-0092 RC PUMP OIL CLR RET CNTNMT ISOL VALVE 0,5 525 1-FCV-070-0100 RC PUMP OIL CLR HDR CONT ISOL VALVE 0,5 526 1-FCV-070-0133 RC PUMP THERM BARRIER CONT ISOL VALVE 0 527 1-FCV-070-0134 RC PUMP THERM BARRIER CONT ISOL VALVE 0,5 528 1-FCV-070-0143 EXCESS LETDOWN HTX CONT INLET ISOL VLV 5 Page 70 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 UNID Description Safety No. ________ ____________________________ _______________________________________FunctFintio 529 1-FCV-070-0153 RHR HTX B OUTLET VALVE 0,4 530 1-FCV-070-0156 RHR HTX A OUTLET VALVE 0,4 531 1-FCV-070-0183 SAMPLE HTX HDR OUTLET VALVE 0 532 1-FCV-070-0215 SAMP HTX INLET 0 533 1-FCV-072-0002 CONTAINMENT SPRAY HDR B ISOLATION VALVE 5 534 1-FCV-072-0021 RWST TO SPRAY HDR B FLOW CONTROL VALVE 5 535 1-FCV-072-0022 RWST TO SPRAY HDR A FLOW CONTROL VALVE 5 

  *536    1-FCV-072-0039                                CONTAINMENT SPRAY HDR A ISOLATION VALVE               5 537     1-FCV-072-0040                                RHR SPRAY HEADER A ISOLATION VALVE                    5 538     1-FCV-072-0041                                RHR SPRAY HEADER B ISOLATION VALVE                    5 539     1-FCV-072-0044                                CNTMT SUMP SPRAY HDR A FLOW CONTROL VLV               5 540     1-FCV-072-0045                                CNTMT SUMP SPRAY HDR B FLOW CONTROL VLV               5 541     1-FCV-074-0001-A                              RHR SYSTEM ISOLATION VALVE                            4 542     1-FCV-074-0002-B                              RHR SYSTEM ISOLATION VALVE                           4,5 543     1-FCV-074-0003-A                              RHR PUMP 1A-A INLET FLOW CONTROL VALVE              1,3,4 544     1-FCV-074-0008                                RHR SYSTEM ISOLATION VALVE                           4,5 545     1-FCV-074-0009                                RHR SYSTEM ISOLATION VALVE                           4,5 546     1-FCV-074-0012-A                              RHR PUMP 1A-A MINIMUM FLOW VALVE                    1,3,4 547     1-FCV-074-0016                                RHR HT EX A OUTLET FLOW CONTROL VALVE               1,3,4 548     1-FCV-074-0021-B                              RHR PUMP 1B-B INLET FLOW CONTROL VALVE              1,3,4 549     1-FCV-074-0024-B                              RHR PUMP 1 B-B MINIMUM FLOW VALVE                   1,3,4 550     1-FCV-074-0028                                RHR HT EX B OUT FLOW CONTROL VALVE                  1,3,4 551     1-FCV-074-0032                                RHR HT EX NB BYPASS FCV                              3,4 552     1-FCV-074-0033-A                              RHR HT EX A BYPASS                                   3,4 553     1-FCV-074-0035-B                              RHR HT EX BY BYPASS                                  3,4 554     1-FCV-077-0009-B                              R C DRAIN TANK FLOW CNTL VALVE                        5 555     1-FCV-077-0010-A                              R C DRAIN TANK FLOW CNTL VALVE                        5 556     1-FCV-077-0016-B                              R C DRN TNK GAS ANALY FLW CON                         5 557     1-FCV-077-0017                                R C DRN TNK GAS ANALY FLW CON                         5 558     1-FCV-077-0018-B                              R C DRN TNK TO VENT HDR ISOL                          5 559     1-FCV-077-0019-A                              R C DRN TNK TO VENT HDR ISOL                          5 560     1-FCV-077-0020                                R C DRAIN TANK N2 SUPPLY FLOW                         5 561     1-FCV-077-0127-B                              REACT BLDG SUMP DISCH FLOW CONTROL VA                 5 Page 71 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List I No. UNID Description Safety ____ ___ _________________________________________ Function 562 1-FCV-077-0128-A REACT BLDG SUMP DISCH FLOW CONTROL VA 5 563 1-FCV-081-0012 PW RCS PRESS RELF TNK & RCP STANDPIPES 5 564 1-FCV-090-0107 CNTNMT BLDG LWR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 565 1-FCV-090-0108 CNTNMT BLDG LWR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 566 1-FCV-090-0109 CNTNMT BLDG LWR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 567 1-FCV-090-0110 CNTNMT BLDG LWR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 568 1-FCV-090-0111 CNTNMT BLDG LWR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 569 1-FCV-090-0113 CNTNMT BLDG UPR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 570 1-FCV-090-0114 CNTNMT BLDG UPR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 571 1-FCV-090-0115 CNTNMT BLDG UPR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 572 1-FCV-090-0116 CNTNMT BLDG UPR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 573 1-FCV-090-0117 CNTNMT BLDG UPR COMPT MON ISOL VALVE 5 574 1-FE-074-0012 RHR FLOW INDICATOR, TRAIN A 3,4 575 1-FE-074-0024 RHR FLOW INDICATOR, TRAIN B 3,4 576 1-FIS-070-0081 THERMAL BARRIER CCS HDR FLOW 0 577 1-FIS-074-12-A RHR PMP 1A-A MIN FLOW VALV SW 1,3,4 578 1-FIS-074-24-B RHR PMP 1B-B MIN FLOW VALV SW 1,3,4 579 1-FLTR-031-447 480V BD RM 1B FILTER DRIER 5 580 1-FLTR-031-465 480V BD RM 1A FILTER DRIER 5 581 1-FLTR-062-0065 SEAL WATER RETURN FILTER 3 582 1-FLTR-062-0096 SEAL WATER INJECTION FILTER B 3 583 1-FLTR-062-0097 SEAL WATER INJECTION FILTER A 3 584 1-FLTR-062-0117 REACTOR COOLANT FILTER 3 585 1-FS-030-447-A DG lA-A RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 586 1-FS-030-449-B DG 1B-B RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 587 1-FS-030-451-A DG 1A-A RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 588 1-FS-030-453-B DG lA-A RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 589 1-FSV-001-0004A SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 590 1-FSV-001-0004B SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 591 1-FSV-001-0004D SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 592 1-FSV-001-0004E SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 593 1-FSV-001-0004G SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 594 1-FSV-001-0004H SG1 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 Page 72 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 595 1-FSV-001-0011A SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 596 1-FSV-001-0011B SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 597 1-FSV-001-O011D SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 598 1-FSV-001-0011E SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 599 1-FSV-001-0011G SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 600 1-FSV-001-0011H SG2 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 601 1-FSV-001-0022A SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 602 1-FSV-001-0022B SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 603 1-FSV-001-0022D SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 604 1-FSV-001-0022E SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 605 1-FSV-001-0022G SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 606 1-FSV-001-0022H SG3 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 607 1-FSV-001-0029A SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 608 1-FSV-001-0029B SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 609 1-FSV-001-0029D SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 610 1-FSV-001-0029E SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 611 1-FSV-001-0029G SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 612 1-FSV-001-0029H SG4 MAIN STM HDR ISO VLV 5 613 1-FSV-030-0134 CONT ANNULUS DP ISOLATION VALVE 5 614 1-FSV-030-0135 CONT ANNULUS DP ISOLATION VALVE 5 615 1-FSV-031-441 480V BD RM IA REFRIGERANT LINE FSV 5 616 1-FSV-031-447 480V BD RM 1B REFRIGERANT LINE FSV 5 617 1-FSV-043-0075B DNSTR EXCSW ITDN HT EXC ISO 5 618 1-FSV-043-0077A EXCESS ITDN HX SMPL ISOL 5 619 1-FSV-043-0250A PAS HOT LEG 1 SAMPLE ISOL 5 620 1-FSV-043-0251A PAS HOT LEG 1 SAMPLE ISOL 5 621 1-FSV-043-0287A PAS CONT AIR SUPPLY ISOL 5 622 1-FSV-043-0288A PAS CONT AIR SUPPLY ISOL 5 623 1-FSV-043-0307A PAS CONT AIR RETURN ISOL 5 624 1-FSV-043-0309B PAS HOT LEG 3 SAMPLE ISOL 5 625 1-FSV-043-0310B PAS HOT LEG 3 SAMPLE ISOL 5 626 1-FSV-043-0318B PAS CONT AIR SPL ISO 5 627 1-FSV-043-0319B PAS CONT AIR SPL ISO 5 Page 73 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 628 1-FSV-043-0325B PAS CNTMT AIR RETRN ISOL 5 629 1-FSV-043-0341B PAS WASTE TO CONT SUMP ISO 5 630 1-FSV-043-0342A PAS WASTE TO CONT SMP ISOL 5 631 1-FSV-061-0096-A GLYCOL SUPPLY HDR ISO VLV 5 632 1-FSV-061-0097-B GLYCOL SUPPLY HDR ISO VLV 5 633 1-FSV-061-0110-A GLYCOL RETURN HDR ISO VLV 5 634 1-FSV-061-01220B GLYCOL RETURN HDR ISO VLV 5 635 1-FSV-061-0191-A GLYCOL CUPPLY CONT ISO VLV 5 636 1-FSV-061-0192-B GLYCOL CUPPLY CONT ISO VLV 5 637 1-FSV-061-0193-A GLYCOL FLOOR RETURN ISO VLV 5 638 1-FSV-061-0194-BA GLYCOL CLOOR RETURN ISO VLV 5 639 1-FSV-062-0009 RCP .1 SEAL INJECT ISO VLV SOLENOID 3 640 1-FSV-062-0022 RCP 2 SEAL INJECT ISO VLV SOLENOID 3 641 1-FSV-062-0035 RCP 3 SEAL INJECT ISO VLV SOLENOID 3 642 1-FSV-062-0048 RCP 4 SEAL INJECT ISO VLV SOLENOID 3 643 1-FSV-062-0069-A RC LOOP 3 LETDOWN ISOLATION VALVE 5,3 644 1-FSV-062-0070-A RC LOOP 3 LETDOWN ISOLATION VALVE 5,3 645 1-FSV-062-0072-A REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE A ISO VL 5 646 1-FSV-062-0073 REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE B ISO VL 5,3 647 1-FSV-062-0074 REGEN HT EXCH LETDOWN ORIFICE C ISO VL 5,3 648 1-FSV-062-0076 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISOLATION 5,3 649 1-FSV-062-0077 LETDOWN ORIFICE ISOLATION 5,3 650 1-FSV-062-0084 AUX PRZR SPRAY 2 651 1-FSV-062-0085-B NORMAL CHARGING ISOLATION VALVE 3 652 1-FSV-063-0021 SIS PUMP OUTLET TO SIS TEST LINE 3,4,5 653 1-FSV-063-0023-B SIS ACUM FILL LINE ISO VLV 3,4,5 654 1-FSV-063-0064-A SIS ACUM TANK N2 HDR INLET VLV 5 655 1-FSV-063-0071-A SIS CHECK VLV FLOW ISO VLV 5 656 1-FSV-063-0084-B SIS CHECK VLV HDR FLOW ISO VLV 5 657 1-FSV-063-0185 RHR SUPPLY TEST LINE VLV 5 658 1-FSV-068-0305-A RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS N2 TO PRT 5 659 1-FSV-068-0307-A RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS GA TO PRT 5 660 1-FSV-068-0308-A RCS FLOW CNTL VLV WDS GA TO PRT 5 Page 74 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 661 1-FSV-068-0394-A REACTOR HEAD VENT ISOLATION VALVE 4 662 1-FSV-068-0395-B REACTOR HEAD VENT ISOLATION VALVE 4 663 1-FSV-068-0396-B REACTOR HEAD VENT ISOLATION VALVE 4 664 1-FSV-068-0397-A REACTOR HEAD VENT ISOLATION VALVE 4 665 1-FSV-077-0009-B R C DRAIN TANK FLOW CNTL VALVE 5 666 1-FSV-077-0010-A R C DRAIN TANK FLOW CNTL VALVE 5 667 1-FSV-077-0016-A R C DRAIN TK GAS ANALYZ FLOW 5 668 1-FSV-077-0017-A R C DRAIN TK GAS ANALYZ FLOW 5 669 1-FSV-077-0019-A R C DRAIN TK TO VENT HDR 5 670 1-FSV-077-0020 R C DRAIN TK TO VENT HDR 5 671 1-FSV-081-0012 PW RCS PRESS RELF TNK & RCP STANDPIPES 5 672 1-FT-062-0001 RCP NO.1 SEAL INJECTION FLOW 3 673 1-FT-062-0014 RCP NO.2 SEAL INJECTION FLOW 3 674 1-FT-062-0027 RCP NO.3 SEAL INJECTION FLOW 3 675 1-FT-062-0040 RCP NO.4 SEAL WATER FLOW 3 676 1-FT-062-93A CHARGING HEADER FLOW CONTROL 3 677 1-FT-067-0061-A ERCW HDR 1A SUPPLY 0 678 1-FT-067-0062-B ERCW HDR 1B SUPPLY 0 679 1-FT-067-0122 CNTMT SPRAY HX 1B-B ERCW INLET FLOW 0 680 1-FT-067-0136 CNTMT SPRAY HX 1A-A ERCW INLET FLOW 0 681 1-FT-070-0159-A 1A ESF EQUIP - CCS SUPPLY HDR 0 682 1-FT-070-0165-B 1B ESF EQUIP - CCS SUPPLY HDR 0 683 1-FT-070-0215A-A SAMPLE HTX HDR INLET FLOW 0 684 1-FT-070-0215B-A SAMPLE HTX HDR OUTLET FLOW 0 685 1-FT-072-0013-G CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEADER B MINI FLOW CTL 5 686 1-FT-072-0034-F CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEADER A MINI FLOW CTL 5 687 1-GEN-082-0001A DIESEL GENERATOR 1A-A 0 688 1-GEN-082-0001B DIESEL GENERATOR 1B-B 0 689 1-HIC-062-89A RCP SEAL INJECTION FLOW 3 690 1-HIC-062-93A CHARGING HEADER FLOW CONTROL-PER LE 3 691 1-HS-067-0431B-A SCRN WASH PUMP lA-A HAND SWITCH 0 692 1-HS-067-0440B-B SCRN WASH PUMP lB-B HAND SWITCH 0 693 1-HTX-062-0066 SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 3 Page 75 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ___________________________Function 694 1-HTX-062-0120 REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER 3 695 1-HTX-062-0121 EXCESS LETDOWN HTX 0 696 1-HTX-062-0124 LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER 3 697 1-HTX-070-0185 COMPONENT COOLING HX A 0 698 1-HTX-072-0001A CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER 1A 5 699 1-HTX-072-0001B CONTAINMENT SPREAY HEAT EXCHANGER 1B 5 700 1-HTX-074-0010-A RHR PUMP 1A-A SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER 1,3,4 701 1-HTX-074-0020-B RHR PUMP 1B-B INLET SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER 1,3,4 702 1-HTX-074-0030-A RHR HEAT EXCHANGER 1A 1,3,4 703 1-HTX-074-0031-B RHR HEAT EXCHANGER lB 1,3,4 704 1-IACL-082-0101 DG EN 1Al INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 705 1-IACL-082-0102 DG EN 1A2 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 706 1-IACL-082-0103 DG EN 1B1 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 707 1-IACL-082-0104 DG EN 1B2 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 708 1-INV-235-0001-D 120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-1 0 709 1-INV-235-0002-E 120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-11 0 710 1-INV-235-0003-F 120VAC VITAL INVERTER 1-111 0 711 1-INV-235-0004-G 120VAC VITAL INVERTER I-IV 0 712 1-JB-290-5235 SG 1,2,3,4 BLOWDOWN CNTL & ISO VLV RELAY 5 713 1-JB-290-5250 SG 1,2,3,4 BLOWDOWN CNTL & ISO VLV RELAY 5 714 1-JB-292-3351 0-XFMR-31-33B & 0-XFMR-31-35-B 0 715 1-JB-292-3352 O-XFMR-31-32-A & 0-XFMR-31-34-A 0 716 1-JB-293-6294 1-RLY-043-207-B & 208-B, H2 MONITOR 5 717 1-JB-293-6295 1-RLY-043-201-A & 202-A, H2 MONITOR 5 718 1-LCV-003-0148 STM GEN #3 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 4,5 719 1-LCV-003-0148A CONT ISO 4,5 720 1-LCV-003-0156 STM GEN #2 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 4,5 721 1-LCV-003-0156A CONT ISO 4,5 722 1-LCV-003-0164 STM GEN #1 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 4,5 723 1-LCV-003-0164A CON ISO 4,5 724 1-LCV-003-0171 STM GEN #4 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 4,5 725 1-LCV-003-0171A CONT ISO 4,5 726 1-LCV-003-0172 STM GEN #3 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 5 Page 76 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 727 1-LCV-003-0173 STM GEN #2 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 5 728 1-LCV-003-0174 STM GEN #1 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 5 729 1-LCV-003-0175 STM GEN #4 LEVEL CONTROL VALVE 5 730 1-LCV-062-0118-A HOLDUP TANK VALVE 3 731 1-LCV-062-0132-A VCT OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE LEVEL CONTR 3 732 1-LCV-062-0133-B VCT OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE LEVEL CONTR 3 733 1-LCV-062-0135-A RWST CVCS SUPPLY HDR ISOLATION 3 734 1-LCV-062-0136-B RWST CVCS SUPPLY HDR ISOLATION 3 735 1-LCV-070-0063 CCS SURGE TANK DEMIN WATER INLET VALVE 0 736 1-LSV-062-0118A HOLDUP TANK - DIVERSION VALVE 3 737 1-LSV-062-0118B HOLDUP TANK - DIVERSION VALVE 3 738 1-LT-003-0038 STM GEN 1 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 739 1-LT-003-0039 STM GEN 1 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 740 1-LT-003-0042 STM GEN 1 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 741 1-LT-003-0043 STM GEN 1 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 742 1-LT-003-0051 STM GEN 2 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 743 1-LT-003-0052 STM GEN 2 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 744 1-LT-003-0055 STM GEN 2 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 745 1-LT-003-0056 STM GEN 2 LEVEL XMTR (WR) 4 746 1-LT-003-0093 STM GEN 3 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 747 1-LT-003-0094 STM GEN 3 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 748 1-LT-003-0097 STM GEN 3 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 749 1-LT-003-0098 STM GEN 3 LEVEL XMTR (WR) 4 750 1-LT-003-0106 STM GEN 4 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 751 1-LT-003-0107 STM GEN 4 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 752 1-LT-003-0110 STM GEN 4 LEVEL XMTR (NR) 4 753 1-LT-003-0111 STM GEN 4 LEVEL XMTR (WR) 4 754 1-LT-003-148 AFW PMP 1B-B, SG 3 LVL 4 755 1-LT-003-156 AFW PMP 1A-A, SG 2 LVL 4 756 1-LT-003-164 AFW PMP 1A-A, SG 1 LVL 4 757 1-LT-003-171 AFW PMP 1B-B, SG 4 LVL 4 758 1-LT-062-0129A VOLUME CONTROL TANK LEVEL XMITTER 3 759 1-LT-062-0129C VOLUME CONTROL TANK LEVEL XMITTER 3 Page 77 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 760 1-LT-062-0130A VOLUME CONTROL TANK LEVEL XMITTER 3 761 1-LT-062-0130C VOLUME CONTROL TANK LEVEL XMITTER 3 762 1-LT-063-0050D RWST LEVEL 0 763 1-LT-063-0051-E RWST LEVEL 0 764 1-LT-063-0052-F RWST LEVEL 0 765 1-LT-063-0053-G RWST LEVEL 0 766 1-LT-063-0180-D CNTMT SUMP LEVEL 0 767 1-LT-063-0181-E CNTMT SUMP LEVEL 0 768 1-LT-063-0182-F CNTMT SUMP LEVEL 0 769 1-LT-063-0183-G CNTMT SUMP LEVEL 0 770 1-LT-068-0320-F RCS PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER 3 771 1-LT-068-0335-E RCS PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER 3 772 1-LT-068-0339-D RCS PRESSURIZER LEVEL TRANSMITTER 3 

 .773     1-LT-068-367-D  REACTOR VESSEL WIDE RANGE LEVEL       0 774     1-LT-068-368-D  REACTOR VESSEL NARROW RANGE LEVEL     0 775     1-LT-068-369-D  REACTOR VESSEL UPPER PLENUM LEVEL     0 776     1-LT-068-370-E  REACTOR VESSEL WIDE RANGE LEVEL       0 777     1-LT-068-371-E  REACTOR VESSEL NARROW RANGE LEVEL     0 778     1-LT-068-372-E  REACTOR VESSEL UPPER PLENUM LEVEL     0 779     1-LT-070-0063A  CCS SURGE TANK 1A SIDE LEVEL          0 780     1-LT-070-0099A  CCS SURGE TANK 1B SIDE LEVEL          0 781     1-MCC-213-A1-A  REACTOR MOV BOARD 1A1-A               0 782     1-MCC-213-A2-A  REACTOR MOV BOARD 1A2-A               0 783     1-MCC-213-B1-B  REACTOR MOV BOARD 1B1-B               0 784     1-MCC-213-B2-B  REACTOR MOV BOARD 1B2-B               0 785     1-MCC-214-A1-A  480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 1A1-A    0 786     1-MCC-214-A2-A  480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 1A2-A    0 787     1-MCC-214-B1-B  480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 1B1-B    0 788     1-MCC-214-B2-B  480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 1B2-B    0 789     1-MCC-215-A1-A  DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 1A1-A          0 790     1-MCC-215-A2-A  DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 1A2-A          0 791     1-MCC-215-B1-B  DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 1B1-B          0 792     1-MCC-215-B2-B  DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 1B2-B          0 Page 78 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 793 1-MCC-232-A-A REACTOR VENT BOARD 1A-A 0 794 1-MCC-232-B-B REACTOR VENT BOARD 1B-B 0 795 1-NM-092-131-D CH 1 NEUT MON SOURCE/INTER RNG AMP 0 796 1-NM-092-132-E CH 2 NEUT MON SOURCE/INTER RNG AMP 0 797 1-NM-092-138-D CHI NEUT MON APP R ISOLATOR 0 798 1-OFX-212-B2-B 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 2B2-B 0 799 1-OXF-068-341 D-B PZR BACKUP HTR TRANSFORMER 0 800 1-OXF-068-341A-A PZR BACKUP HTR TRANSFORMER 0 801 1-OXF-212-A1-A 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 1Al-A 0 802 1-OXF-212-A2-A 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 1B2-A 0 803 1-OXF-212-A-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD EMERG XFMR 1A-A 0 804 1-OXF-212-B1-B 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 1B1-B 0 

 .805     1-OXF-212-B-B                               480V      SHUTDOWN            BD EMERG XFMR 1B-B   0 806     1-PCV-001-0005-T                            SG 1 MAIN STM HDR PWR RELIEF CONTROL VLV          4,5 807     1-PCV-001-0012-T                            SG 2 MAIN STM HDR PWR RELIEF CONTROL VLV          4,5 808     1-PCV-001-0023-T                            SG 3 MAIN STM HDR PWR REFLIEF CONTROL VLV         4,5 809     1-PCV-001-0030-T                            SG 4 MAIN STM HDR PWR RELIEF CONTROL VLV          4,5 810     1-PCV-003-0122                              MDP THROTTLE VLV                                   4 811     1-PCV-003-0132                              MDP THROTTLE VLV                                   4 812     1-PCV-062-0081                              LETDOWN HEAT EXCH PRESS CONT                       3 813     1-PCV-068-0334-E                            RCS PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF VALVE                2,4 814     1-PCV-068-0340A-A                           RCS PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF VALVE                2,4 815     1-PDT-030-0042                              CNTMT/ANNULUS DIFFERENTIAL PRESS                   5 816     1-PDT-030-0043                              CNTMT/ANNULUS DIFFERENTIAL PRESS                   5 817     1-PDT-030-0044                              CNTMT/ANNULUS DIFFERENTIAL PRESS                   5 818     1-PDT-030-0045                              CNTMT/ANNULUS DIFFERENTIAL PRESS                   5 819     1-PMCL-030-175                              RHR PUMP 1A-A ROOM COOLER                          5 820     1-PMCL-030-176                              RHR PUMP 1B-B ROOM COOLER                          5 821     1-PMCL-030-177                              CONT SPRAY PUMP lA-A ROOM COOLER                   5 822     1-PMCL-030-178                              CONT SPRAY PUMP 1B-B ROOM COOLER                   5 823     1-PMCL-030-179                              SIS PUMP 1B-B ROOM COOLER                          5 824     1-PMCL-030-180                              SIS PUMP 1A-A ROOM COOLER                          5 825     1-PMCL-030-182                              CENT CHARGING PUMP 1B-B COOLER                     5 Page 79 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___________________________ _____________________________________FunctFun tio 826 1-PMCL-030-183 CENT CHARGING PUMP 1A-A COOLER 5 827 1-PMCL-030-190 CCS & AUX FEEDWATER PUMP AREA COOLER 5 828 1-PMCL-030-191 CCS & AUX FEEDWATER PUMP AREA COOLER 5 829 1-PMP-003-0118 MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 1A-A 4 830 1-PMP-003-0128 MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 1B-B 4 831 1-PMP-018-0054/1 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0,4 832 1-PMP-018-0054/2 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0,4 833 1-PMP-018-0055/1 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0,4 834 1-PMP-018-055/2 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0,4 835 1-PMP-062-0104-B CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP 1B-B 3 836 1-PMP-062-0108-A CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP 1A-A 3 837 1-PMP-063-0010-A SIS PUMP 1A-A 1,3,4 838 1-PMP-063-0015-B SIS PUMP 1B-B 1,3,4 839 1-PMP-067-0431 ERCW SCREEN WASH PUMP 1A-A 0 840 1-PMP-067-0440 ERCW SCREEN WASH PUMP 1B-B 0 841 1-PMP-068-0008 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP 1 2 842 1-PMP-068-0031 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP 2 2 843 1-PMP-068-0050 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP 3 2 844 1-PMP-068-0073 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP 4 2 845 1-PMP-070-0038 CCS PUMP 1B-B 0 846 1-PMP-070-0046 CCS PUMP 1A-A 0 847 1-PMP-070-0130 CCS THERMAL BARRIER BOOSTER PUMP 1B-B 0 848 1-PMP-070-0131 CCS THERMAL BARRIER BOOSTER PUMP 1A-A 0 849 1-PMP-072-0010 CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 1B-B -5 850 1-PMP-072-0027 CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP 1A-A 5 851 1-PMP-074-0010-A RHR PUMP 1A-A 1,3,4 852 1-PMP-074-0020-B RHR PUMP 1B-B 1,3,4 853 1-PNL-082-A-A DG 1A-A CONT. BRD 0 854 1-PNL-082-B-B DG 1B-B CONT. BRD 0 855 1-PNL-099-L116 REACT TRIP SG 1 856 1-PNL-099-ROO1-D REACTOR PROTECTION SET 1 0 857 1-PNL-099-RO02-D REACTOR PROTECTION SET 1 0 858 1-PNL-099-RO03-D REACTOR PROTECTION SET 1 0 Page 80 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID _________________________________________ Function 859 1-PNL-099-RO04-D REACTOR PROTECTION SET 1 0 860 1-PNL-099-RO05-E REACTOR PROTECTION SET 2 0 861 1-PNL-099-RO06-E REACTOR PROTECTION SET 2 0 862 1-PNL-099-RO07-E REACTOR PROTECTION SET 2 0 863 1-PNL-099-RO08-E REACTOR PROTECTION SET 2 0 864 1-PNL-099-RO09-F REACTOR PROTECTION SET 3 0 865 1-PNL-099-RO1O-F REACTOR PROTECTION SET 3 0 866 1-PNL-099-RO11-F REACTOR PROTECTION SET 3 0 867 1-PNL-099-RO12-G REACTOR PROTECTION SET 4 0 868 1-PNL-099-RO13-G REACTOR PROTECTION SET 4 0 869 1-PNL-099-RO46-A SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN A 0 870 1-PNL-099-RO47-A SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN A 0 871 1-PNL-099-RO48-A SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN A 0 872 1-PNL-099-RO49-B SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN B 0 873 1-PNL-099-RO50-B SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN B 0 874 1-PNL-099-RO51-B SOLID STATE PROTECTION TRAIN B 0 875 1-PNL-099-RO52-A TEST PANEL A 0 876 1-PNL-099-RO53-B TEST PANEL B 0 877 1-PNL-099-RO54-A NSSS AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A 0 878 1-PNL-099-RO55-B NSSS AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL B 0 879 1-PNL-099-R058 NSSS AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL COMMON 0 880 1-PNL-099-R28-G REACTOR PROTECTION SET 4 0 881 1-PNL-211-A-A 6.9KV LOGIC RELAY PANEL 1A-A 0 882 1-PNL-211-B-B 6.9KV LOGIC RELAY PANEL 1B-B 0 883 1-PNL-275-R127-A TRAIN A BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 884 1-PNL-275-R131-B TRAIN B BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 885 1-PNL-275-R140-B TRAIN B BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 886 1-PNL-275-R143-A TRAIN A BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 887 1-PNL-275-R148 REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL IND. SYS 0 888 1-PNL-275-R71 TURBO-GEN AUX RELAY PANEL 0 889 1-PNL-275-R72 FEEDWATER AUX RELAY PANEL 0 890 1-PNL-275-R73-A SEPARATIONS AUX RELAY PANEL A 0 891 1-PNL-275-R74-A SEPARATIONS AUX RELAY PANEL A 0 Page 81 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____________________________Function 892 1-PNL-275-R75 SEPARATIONS AUX RELAY PANEL A COMM 0 893 1-PNL-275-R77-B SEPARATIONS AUX RELAY PANEL B 0 894 1-PNL-275-R78-B SEPARATIONS AUX RELAY PANEL B 0 895 1-PNL-276-LO10 AUX CONT RM PNL 0 896 1-PNL-276-LO11A AUX CONT RM PNL 0 897 1-PNL-276-LO11B AUX CONT RM PNL 0 898 1-PNL-278-M(ALL) ALL Ul MCR PANELS 0 899 1-PRES-068-PR PRESSURIZER 2,3 900 1-PS-003-139A AFW PMP 1A-A, SUCTION PRESS 2 901 1-PS-003-139B AFW PMP 1A-A, SUCTION PRESS 2 902 1-PS-003-139D AFW PMP 1A-A, SUCTION PRESS C 2 903 1-PS-003-144A AFW PMP 1B-B, SUCTION PRESS 2 904 1-PS-003-144B AFW PMP 1B-B, SUCTION PRESS 2 905 1-PS-003-144D AFW PMP 1B-B, SUCTION PRESS 2 906 1-PS-031-447A-B 480V BD RM 1B R-22 GAS PRESS 5 907 1-PS-031-465-A 480V BD RM 1A R-22 GAS PRESS 5 908 1-PS-067-0434 TRAVEL SCRN lA-A INLET PRESS 0 909 1-PS-067-0445 TRAVEL SCRN 1B-B INLET PRESS 0 910 1-PSV-001-006A SG 1 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 911 1-PSV-001-006B SG 1 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 912 1-PSV-001-006C SG 1 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 913 1-PSV-001-013A SG 1 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 914 1-PSV-001-013B SG 2 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 915 1-PSV-001-013C SG 2 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 916 1-PSV-001-024A SG 3 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 917 1-PSV-001-024B SG 3 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 918 1-PSV-001-024C SG 3 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 919 1-PSV-001-031A SG 4 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 920 1-PSV-001-031B SG 4 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 921 1-PSV-001-031C SG 4 MAIN PWR RELIEF CONT VLV 4,5 922 1-PT-001-0002A MAIN STEAM LOOP 1 PRESS 0,4 923 1-PT-001-0002B MAIN STEAM LOOP 1 PRESS 0,4 924 1-PT-001-0009A MAIN STEAM LOOP 2 PRESSURE 0,4 Page 82 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID Function 925 1-PT-001-0009B MAIN STEAM LOOP 2 PRESSURE 0,4 926 1-PT-001-0020A MAIN STEAM LOOP 3 PRESSURE 0,4 927 1-PT-001-0020B MAIN STEAM LOOP 3 PRESSURE 0,4 928 1-PT-001-0027A MAIN STEAM LOOP 4 PRESSURE 0,4 929 1-PT-001-0027B MAIN STEAM LOOP 4 PRESSURE 0,4 930 1-PT-030-0310 CONTAINMENT PRESS TRANSMITTER 5 931 1-PT-030-0311 CONTAINMENT PRESS TRANSMITTER 5 932 1-PT-068-0070-G RCS WIDE RANGE PRESSURE LOOP 4 HOT LEG 2,4 933 1-PT-068-0322-G RCS PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 2 934 1-PT-068-0323-F RCS PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 2 935 1-PT-068-0334-E RCS PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 2 936 1-PT-068-0340-D RCS PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 2 937 1-PT-070-0024A-A CCS HTX A INLET PRESSURE 0 938 1-RE-090-0271 CNTNMT RAD MONITOR 0 939 1-RE-090-0272 CNTNMT RAD MONITOR 0 940 1-RE-090-0273 CNTNMT RAD MONITOR 0 941 1-RE-090-0274 CNTNMT RAD MONITOR 0 942 1-RFV-062-0636 SEAL LINE RELIEF 3 943 1-RFV-068-0563 PRESS. SAFETY VALVE 2,4 944 1-RFV-068-0564 PRESS. SAFETY VALVE 2,4 945 1-RFV-068-0565 PRESS. SAFETY VALVE 2,4 946 1-RPV-068-U1 REACTOR VESSEL 2 947 1-SEP-031-447 480V BD RM 1B OIL SEPARATOR 5 948 1-SEP-031-465 480V BD RM 1A OIL SEPARATOR 5 949 1-SFV-001-0512 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-3 4 950 1-SFV-001-0513 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-3 4 951 1-SFV-001-0514 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-3 4 952 1-SFV-001-0515 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-3 4 953 1-SFV-001-0516 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-3 4 954 1-SFV-001-0517 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-2 4 955 1-SFV-001-0518 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-2 4 956 1-SFV-001-0519 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-2 4 957 1-SFV-001-0520 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-2 4 Page 83 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Function 958 1-SFV-001-0521 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-2 4 959 1-SFV-001-0522 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-1 4 960 1-SFV-001-0523 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-1 4 961 1-SFV-001-0524 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-1 4 962 1-SFV-001-0525 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-1 4 963 1-SFV-001-0526 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-1 4 964 1-SFV-001-0527 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-4 4 965 1-SFV-001-0528 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-4 4 966 1-SFV-001-0529 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-4 4 967 1-SFV-001-0530 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-4 4 968 1-SFV-001-0531 MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVES, SG-4 4 969 1-SGEN-068-SG1 STEAM GENERATOR 1 2 970 1-SGEN-068-SG2 STEAM GENERATOR 2 2 971 1-SGEN-068-SG3 STEAM GENERATOR 3 2 972 1-SGEN-068-SG4 STEAM GENERATOR 4 2 973 1-SILN-082-0101-A DG ENG lAl INTAKE SILENCER 0 974 1-SILN-082-0102-A DG ENG 1A2 INTAKE SILENCER 0 975 1-SILN-082-0103-B DG ENG 1B1 INTAKE SILENCER 0 976 1-SILN-082-0104-B DG ENG 1B2 INTAKE SILENCER 0 977 1-SILN-082-0105-A DG ENG lAl EXHST SILENCER 0 978 1-SILN-082-0106-A DG ENG 1A2 EXHST SILENCER 0 979 1-SILN-082-0107-B DG ENG 1B EXHST SILENCER 0 980 1-SILN-082-0108-B DG ENG 1B EXHST SILENCER 0 981 1-STN-067-0009 ERCW STRAINER AlA-A 0 982 1-STN-067-0010 ERCW STRAINER B1B-B 0 983 1-TANK-062-0129 VOLUME CONTROL TANK 3 984 1-TANK-062-1A HOLD UP TANK 3 985 1-TANK-063-0036 BORON INJECTION TANK 1A (CCP INJ TNK) 1,3,4 986 1-TANK-063-0046 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK 1,3,4 987 1-TANK-068-PRT PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK 2,4 988 1-TCV-062-0079 LETDOWN FLOW TEMP DIVERSION CONT VLV 3 989 1-TE-068-0001-D RCS LOOP 1 HOT LEG TEMP 2,4 990 1-TE-068-0018-D RCS LOOP 1 COLD LEG TEMP 2,4 Page 84 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ____ ___ _________________________________________ Function 991 1-TE-068-0024-D RCS LOOP 2 HOT LEG TEMP 2,4 992 1-TE-068-0041-D RCS LOOP 2 COLD LEG TEMP 2,4 993 l-TE-068-0043-E RCS LOOP 3 HOT LEG TEMP 2,4 994 1-TE-068-0060-E RCS LOOP 3 COLD LEG TEMP 2,4 995 1-TE-068-0065-E RCS LOOP 4 HOT LEG TEMP 2,4 996 1-TE-068-0083-E RCS LOOP 4 COLD LEG TEMP 2,4 997 1-TE-068-373-D REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 998 1-TE-068-376-D REACTOR LEVEL TEMP COMP GUIDE TUBE 0 999 1-TE-068-377-D REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1000 1-TE-068-378-D REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1001 1-TE-068-379-D REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1002 1-TE-068-380-E REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1003 1-TE-068-383-E REACTOR LEVEL TEMP COMP GUIDE TUBE 0 1004 1-TE-068-384-E REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1005 1-TE-068-385-E REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1006 1-TE-068-386 REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1007 1-TE-068-393-E REACTOR LEVEL CAPILLARY TUBE TEMP COMP 0 1008 1-TE-070-0161-A CCS HEAT EXCHANGER A OUTLET TEMP 0 1009 1-TIS-062-79 LETDOWN FLOW TEMP SWITCH 3 1010 1-TNK-018-0061/1 DG DAY TANK lAl 0,4 1011 1-TNK-018-0061/2 DG DAY TANK 1B1 0,4 1012 1-TNK-018-0076/1 DG DAY TANK 1A2 0,4 1013 1-TNK-018-0076/2 DG DAY TANK 1B2 0,4 1014 1-TNK-070-0001 COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK 0 1015 1-TS-030-175-A RHR PUMP 1A-A ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1016 1-TS-030-176-B RHR PUMP 1B-B ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1017 1-TS-030-177-A CS PUMP 1A-A ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1018 1-TS-030-178-B CS PUMP 1B-B ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1019 1-TS-030-179-B SIS PUMP 1B;B ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1020 1-TS-030-180-A SIS PUMP 1A-A ROOM CLR TEMP 5 1021 1-TS-030-182-B CENT CHARG PUMP 1B-B RM CLR TEMP 5 1022 1-TS-030-183-A CENT CHARG PUMP 1A-A RM CLR TEMP 5 1023 1-TS-030-186A-A PENETRATION RM EL 692 CLR lA-A TEMP 5 Page 85 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 1024 1-TS-030-186B-A PENETRATION RM EL 692 CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1025 1-TS-030-187A-B PENETRATION RM EL 692 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1026 1-TS-030-187B-B PENETRATION RM EL 692 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1027 1-TS-030-190A-A CCS & AFW PUMP SPACE CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1028 1-TS-030-190B-A CCS & AFW PUMP SPACE CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1029 1-TS-030-191A-B CCS & AFW PUMP SPACE CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1030 1-TS-030-191B-B CCw & AFW PUMP SPACE CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1031 1-TS-030-194A-A PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1032 1-TS-030-194B-A PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR lA-A TEMP 5 1033 1-TS-030-195A-B PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1034 1-TS-030-195B-B PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1035 1-TS-030-196A-A PENETRATION RM EL 713 CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1036 1-TS-030-196B-A PENETRATION RM EL 713 CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1037 1-TS-030-197A-B PENETRATION RM EL 713 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1038 1-TS-030-197B-B PENETRATION RM EL 713 CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1039 1-TS-030-201A-A AB EL 692 PIPE CHASE CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1040 1-TS-030-201B-A AB EL 692 PIPE CHASE CLR 1A-A TEMP 5 1041 1-TS-030-202A-B AB EL 692 PIPE CHASE CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1042 1-TS-030-202B-B AB EL 692 PIPE CHASE CLR 1B-B TEMP 5 1043 1-TS-030-244A-A TRANSFORMER RM IA EXH FAN 1A1-A TEMP 5 1044 1-TS-030-244B-A TRANSFORMER RM 1A EXH FAN 1A2-A TEMP 5 1045 1-TS-030-244D-A TRANSFORMER RM 1A EXH FAN 1A3-A TEMP 5 1046 1-TS-030-244E TRANSFORMER RM 1A EXH FAN 1A4-A TEMP 5 1047 1-TS-030-248A-B TRANSFORMER RM 1B EXH FAN 1B1-B TEMP 5 1048 1-TS-030-248B-B TRANSFORMER RM 1B EXH FAN 1B1-B TEMP 5 1049 1-TS-030-248D-B TRANSFORMER RM 1B EXH FAN 1B1-B TEMP 5 1050 1-TS-030-447A-A DG 1A-A RM EXH FAN 1A HI TEMP 5 1051 1-TS-030-447B-A DG 1A-A RM EXH FAN 1A LO TEMP 5 1052 1-TS-030-449A-B DG 1B-B RM EXH FAN 1B HI TEMP 5 1053 1-TS-030-449B-B DG 1B1B RM EXH FAN 1B LO TEMP 5 1054 1-TS-030-451A-A DG lA-A RM EXH FAN 2A HI TEMP 5 1055 1-TS-030-451A-A DG 1A-A RM EXH FAN 2A LO TEMP 5 1056 1-TS-030-453A-B DG 1B-B RM EXH FAN 2B HI TEMP 5 Page 86 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID _______ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ _ _ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Function 1057 1-TS-030-453B-B DG 1B-B RM EXH FAN 2B LO TEMP 5 1058 1-TS-031-441A-A 480V BD RM 1A AHU lA-A TEMP 5 1059 1-TS-031-441C-A 480V BD RM 1A AHU lA-A TEMP 5 1060 1-TS-031-447A-B 480V BD RM 1B AHU 1B-B TEMP 5 1061 l1TSV-062-79 LETDOWN FLOW TEMP DIVERSION CONTROL 3 1062 1-TWS-067-0434-A TRAVELING SCREEN 1A-A 0 1063 1-TWS-067-0445-B TRAVELING SCREEN 1B-B 0 1064 1-XSW-278-M7 PANEL 1-M-7 TRANSFER RACK 0 1065 2-AHU-031-461 480V BD RM 2A AHU 2A-A 5 1066 2-AHU-031-475 480V BD RM 2B AHU 2B-B 5 1067 2-ARB-082-A-A DG 2A-A PROT RELAY PNL 0 1068 2-ARB-082-B-B DG 2B-B PROT RELAY PNL 0 1069 2-BAT-215-A-A DG 2A-A 125V BATTERY 0 1070 2-BAT-215-B-B DG 2B-B 125V BATTERY 0 1071 2-BD-211-A-A 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD 2A-A 0 1072 2-BD-211-B-B 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD 2B-B 0 1073 2-BD-212-A1-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD 2A1-A 0 1074 2-BD-212-A2-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD 2A2-A 0 1075 2-BD-212-B1-B 480V SHUTDOWN BD 2B1-B 0 1076 2-BD-212-B2-B 480V SHUTDOWN BD 2B2-B 0 1077 2-BD-235-0001-D 120VAC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 2-1 0 1078 2-BD-235-0002-E 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 2-11 0 1079 2-BD-235-0003-F 120V AC VITAL INST POWER BOARD 2-111 0 1080 2-BD-235-0004-G 120V VITAL INST POWER BOARD 2-IV 0 1081 2-BD-237-A 120V AC INSTRU POWER DISTR PNL 2A 0 1082 2-BD-237-B 120C AC INSTRU POWER DISTR PNL 2B 0 1083 2-CDPL-082-A-A DG 2A-A CONT.DIST PNL 0 1084 2-CDPL-082-B-B DG 2B-B CONT DIST PNL 0 1085 2-CHGR-215-A-A DG 2A-A BATTERY CHARGER 0 1086 2-CHGR-215-B-B DG 2B-B BATTERY CHARGER 0 1087 2-CLR-030-194 EL 737 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 2A-A 5 1088 2-CLR-030-195 EL 737 PENETRATION ROOM COOLER 2B-B 5 1089 2-CLR-030-207 EMERGENCY GAS TREATMENT RM COOLER B- 5 Page 87 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List I Description Safety No. UNID ___________________________ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Function 1090 2-COMP-031-447 480V BD RM 2B RECIP COMP 2B-B 5 1091 2-COMP-031-465 480V BD RM 2A RECIP COMP 2A-A 5 1092 2-COND-031-289 480V BD RM 2B AIR COOLED COND 5 1093 2-COND-031-290 480V BD RM 2A AIR COOLED COND 5 1094 2-DIEG-082-A1 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 2A1 0 1095 2-DIEG-082-A2 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 2A2 0 1096 2-DIEG-082-B1 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 2B1 0 1097 2-DIEG-082-B2 DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 2B2 0 1098 2-DPL-082-A-A DG 2B-B 125 VDC DIST PNL 0 1099 2-DPL-082-B-B DG 2B-B125 VDC DIST PNL 0 1100 2-DXF-237-A INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 2A 0 1101 2-DXF-237-B INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 2B 0 1102 2-FAN-030-246F 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B1-B 5 1103 2-FAN-030-246G 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B2-B 5 1104 2-FAN-030-246H 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B3-B 5 1105 2-FAN-030-250E 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A1-A 5 1106 2-FAN-030-250F 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A2-A 5 1107 2-FAN-030-250G 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A3-A 5 1108 2-FAN-030-448 DG RM 2A-A EXH FAN 1 5 1109 2-FAN-030-450 DG RM 2B-B EXH FAN 1 5 1110 2-FAN-030-452 DG RM 2A-A EXH FAN 2 5 1111 2-FAN-030-454 DG RM 2B-B EXH FAN 2 5 1112 2-FAN-030-460 DG 2A-A ELEC BD RM EXHAUST 5 1113 2-FAN-030-462 DG 2B-B ELEC BD RM EXHAUST 5 1114 2-FAN-030-492 DIESEL PANEL 2A-A VENT FAN 5 1115 2-FAN-030-494 DIESEL PANEL 2B-B VENT FAN 5 1116 2-FAN-031-285 BTRY RM III EXHAUST FAN 2B1-A 5 1117 2-FAN-031-286 BTRY RM III EXHAUST FAN 281-B 5 1118 2-FAN-031-287 BTRY RM IV EXHAUST FAN 2A1-A 5 1119 2-FAN-031-288 BTRY RM IV EXHAUST FAN 2A2-B 5 1120 2-FCO-030-246A 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2B DAMPER 5 1121 2-FCO-030-246B 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2B DAMPER 5 1122 2-FCO-030-250A 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2A DAMPER 5 Page 88 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List I Description Safety No. UNID Function 1123 2-FCO-030-250B 480V TRANSFORMER RM 2A DAMPER 5 1124 2-FCO-030-444 DG RM 2A-A AIR INTAKE DAMPER 5 1125 2-FCO-030-446 DG RM 2B-B AIR INTAKE DAMPER 5 1126 2-FCO-030-448 DG RM 2A-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1127 2-FCO-030-450 DG RM 2B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1128 2-FCO-030-452 DG RM 2A-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1129 2-FCO-030-454 DG RM 2B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1130 2-FCO-030-456 DG RM 2A-A EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1131 2-FCO-030-458 DG RM 2B-B EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1132 2-FCO-030-460 DG 2A-A ELEC BD RM EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1133 2-FCO-030-462 DG 2B-B ELEC BD RM EXH FAN DAMPER 5 1134 2-FCO-031-285 BTRY RM III DAMPER FOR FAN 2B1-A 5 1135 2-FCO-031-286 BTRY RM III DAMPER FOR FAN 2B1-B 5 1136 2-FCO-031-287 BTRY RM IV DAMPER FOR FAN 2A1-A 5 1137 2-FCO-031-288 BTRY RM IV DAMPER FOR FAN 2A2-B 5 1138 2-FCO-031-289 480V BD RM COND UNIT 2B-B DAMPER 5 1139 2-FCO-031-290 480V BD RM 2A COND 2A-A DAMPER 5 1140 2-FCO-031-291 480V BD RM 2A COND 2A-A DAMPER 5 1141 2-FCV-067-0009A ERCW STRAINER 2A-A BACKWASH VLV 0 1142 2-FCV-067-0009B ERCW STRAINER 2A-A FLUSH VLV 0 1143 2-FCV-067-0010A ERCW STRAINER 2B-B BACKWASH VLV 0 1144 2-FCV-067-0010B ERCW STRAINER 2B-B FLUSH VLV 0 1145 2-FCV-067-0065 EMERG DSL HTXS Bi & B2 SUP VLV HDR A 0 1146 2-FCV-067-0068 EMERG DSL HTXS Al & A2 SUP VLV HDR B 0 1147 2-FCV-067-217 EL 713 AFW & BA TRANS PMP CLR A-A 0,5 1148 2-FCV-067-219 EL 713 AFW & BA TRANS PMP CLR B-B 0,5 1149 2-FCV-067-336 EGTS RM CLR A-A 0,5 1150 2-FCV-067-338 EGTS RM CLR B-B 0,5 1151 2-FCV-067-354 EL 737 PEN RM CLR 2A-A 0,5 1152 2-FCV-067-356 EL 737 PEN RM CLR 2B-B 0,5 1153 2-FLTR-031-447 480V BD RM 2B FILTER DRIER 5 1154 2-FLTR-031-465 480V BD RM 2A FILTER DRIER 5 1155 2-FS-030-448-A DG 2A-A RM EXH LO FLOW 5 Page 89 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 1156 2-FS-030-450-B DG 2B-B RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 1157 2-FS-030-452-A DG 2A-A RM EXH FAN 2A LOW FLOW 5 1158 2-FS-030-454-B DG 2B-B RM EXH LOW FLOW 5 1159 2-FSV-031-441 480V BD RM 2A REFRIGERANT LINE FSV 5 1160 2-FSV-031-447 480V BD RM 2B REFRIGERANT LINE FSV 5 1161 2-FT-067-0061-A ERCW HDR 2A SUPPLY 0 1162 2-FT-067-0062-B ERCW HDR 2B SUPPLY 0 1163 2-GEN-082-0002A DIESEL GENERATOR 2A-A 0 1164 2-GEN-082-0002B DIESEL GENERATOR 2B-B 0 1165 2-HS-067-0437B-A SCRN WASH PUMP 2A-A HAND SWITCH 0 1166 2-HS-067-0447A-B SCRN WASH PUMP 2B-B HAND SWITCH 0 1167 2-IACL-082-0201-A DG EN 2A1 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 1168 2-IACL-082-0202-A DG EN 2A2 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 1169 2-IACL-082-0203-B DG EN 2B1 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 1170 2-IACL-082-0204-B DG EN 2B2 INTAKE AIR CLEANER 0 1171 2-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 2-1 0 1172 2-INV-235-0002-E 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 2-11 0 1173 2-INV-235-0003-F 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 2-111 0 1174 2-INV-235-0004-G 120V AC VITAL INVERTER 2-IV 0 1175 2-MCC-213-A1-A REACTOR MOV BOARD 2A1-A 0 1176 2-MCC-213-A2-A REACTOR MOV BOARD 2A2-A 0 1177 2-MCC-213-B1-B REACTOR MOV BOARD 2B1-B 0 1178 2-MCC-213-B2-B REACTOR MOV BOARD 2B2-B 0 1179 2-MCC-214-A1-A 480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 2A1-A 0 1180 2-MCC-214-A2-A 480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 2A2-A 0 1181 2-MCC-214-B1-B 480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 2B1-B 0 1182 2-MCC-214-B2-B 480V CONT & AUX BLDG VENT BD 2B2-B 0 1183 2-MCC-215-A1-A DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 2A1-A 0 1184 2-MCC-215-A2-A DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 2A2-A 0 1185 2-MCC-215-B1-B DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 2B1-B 0 DIESEL AUX POWER BOARD 2B2-B 0 1186 2-MCC-215-B2-B 1187 2-MCC-232-A-A REACTOR VENT BOARD 2A-A 0 1188 2-MCC-232-B-B REACTOR VENT BOARD 2B-B 0 Page 90 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 1189 2-OXF-212-A1-A 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 2A1-A 0 1190 2-OXF-212-A2-A 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 2A2-A 0 1191 2-OXF-212-A-A 480V SHUTDOWN BD EMERG XFMR 2A-A 0 1192 2-OXF-212-B1-B 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 2B1-B 0 1193 2-OXF-212-B2-B 480V SHUTDOWN XFMR 1B2-B 0 1194 2-OXF-212-B-B 480V SHUTDOWN BD EMERG XFMR 28-B 0 1195 2-PMCL-030-184 AUX FW & BORIC ACID TRANSFER PMP CLR A-A 5 1196 2-PMCL-030-185 AUX FW & BORIC ACID TRANSFER PMP CLR B-B 5 1197 2-PMP-018-0054/3 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0 1198 2-PMP-018-0054/4 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0 1199 2-PMP-018-0055/3 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0 1200 2-PMP-018-0055/4 DAY TNK XFER PMP 0 1201 2-PMP-067-0437 ERCW SCREEN WASH PUMP 2A-A 0 1202 2-PMP-067-0447 ERCW SCREEN WASH PUMP 2B-B 0 1203 2-PNL-082-A-A DG 2A-A CONT.BRD 0 1204 2-PNL-082-B-B DG 2B-B CONT BRD. 0 1205 2-PNL-099-R48-A SSPS I/O PANEL TR-A 0 1206 12-PNL-099-R51-B SSPS I/O PANEL TR-B 0 1207 2-PNL-211-A-A 6.9KV LOGIC RELAY PANEL 2A-A 0 1208 2-PNL-211-B-B 6.9KV LOGIC RELAY PANEL 28-B 0 1209 2-PNL-275-R140-B TRAIN B BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 1210 2-PNL-275-R143-A TRAIN A BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 0 1211 2-PNL-278-MOO1 U2 MCR PANEL 0 1212 2-PNL-278-M009 U2 MCR PANEL 0 1213 2-PS-031-447A-B 480V BD RM 2B R-22 GAS PRESS 5 1214 2-PS-031-465-A 480V BD RM 2A R-22 GAS PRESS 5 1215 2-PS-067-0439 TRAVEL SCRN 2A-A INLET PRESS 0 1216 2-PS-067-0451 TRAVEL SCRN 2B-B INLET PRESS 0 1217 2-S1LN-082-0202-A DG ENG 2A2 INTK SILENCER 0 1218 2-S1LN-082-0206-A DG ENG 2A2 EXHST SILENCER 0 1219 2-SEP-031-447 480V BD RM 2B OIL SEPARATOR 5 1220 2-SEP-031-465 480V BD RM 2A OIL SEPARATOR 5 1221 2-SILN -082-0208-B DG ENG 282 EXHST SILENCER 0 Page 91 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 Description Safety No. UNID ___________________________Function 1222 2-SILN-082-0201-A DG ENG 2A1 INTK SILENCER 0 1223 2-SILN-082-0203-B DG ENG 2B1 INTK SILENCER 0 1224 2-SILN-082-0204-B DG ENG 2B2 INTK SILENCER 0 1225 2-SILN-082-0205-A DG ENG 2A1 EXHST SILENCER 0 1226 2-SILN-082-0207-B DG ENG 2B1 EXHST SILENCER 0 1227 2-STN-067-0009 ERCW STRAINER 2A-A 0 1228 2-STN-067-0010 ERCW STRAINER 2B-B 0 1229 2-TANK-018-0061/3 DG DAY TANK 2A1 0 1230 2-TANK-018-0061/4 DG DAY TANK 2B1 0 1231 2-TANK-018-0076/3 DG DAY TANK 2A2 0 1232 2-TANK-018-0076/4 DG DAY TANK 2B2 0 1233 2-TANK-062-1B HOLD UP TANK 3 1234 2-TS-030-184A-A AFW & BA TRANSFER PUMP CLR 2A-A 5 1235 2-TS-030-184B-A AFW & BA TRANSFER PUMP CLR 2A-A 5 1236 2-TS-030-185A-B AFW & BA TRANSFER PUMP CLR 2B-B 5 1237 2-TS-030-185B-B AFW & BA TRANSFER PUMP CLR 2B-B 5 1238 2-TS-030-194A-A PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 2A-A TEMP 5 1239 2-TS-030-194B-A PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 2A-A TEMP 5 1240 2-TS-030-195A-B PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 2B-B TEMP 5 1241 2-TS-030-195B-B PENETRATION RM EL 737 CLR 2B-B TEMP 5 1242 2-TS-030-200A-A EGTS ROOM COOLER 2A-A TEMP 5 1243 2-TS-030-207A-B EGTS ROOM COOLER 2B-B TEMP 5 1244 2-TS-030-246A-B TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B1-B 5 1245 2-TS-030-246B-B TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B2-B 5 1246 2-TS-030-246D-B TRANSFORMER RM 2B EXH FAN 2B3-B 5 1247 2-TS-030-250A-A TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A1-A TEMP 5 1248 2-TS-030-250B-A TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A2-A 5 1249 2-TS-030-250D-A TRANSFORMER RM 2A EXH FAN 2A3-A 5 1250 2-TS-030-448A-A DG 2A-A RM EXH FAN 1A HI TEMP 5 1251 2-TS-030-448B EG 2A-A RM EXH FAN 1A LOW TEMP 5 1252 2-TS-030-450A DG 2B-B RM EXH FAN 1B HI TEMP 5 1253 2-TS-030-450B DG 2B-B RM EXH FAN lB LOW TEMP 5 1254 2-TS-030-452A-A DG 2A-A RM EXH FAN 2A HI TEMP 5 Page 92 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 1 No. UNID Description Safety Function 1255 2-TS-030-452B-A DG 2A-A RM EXH FAN 2A LOW TEMP 5 1256 2-TS-030-454A-B DG 2B-B RM EXH FAN 2B HI TEMP 5 1257 2-TS-030-454B-B DG 2B-B RM EXH FAN 2B LOW TEMP 5 1258 2-TS-031-441A-A 480V BD RM 2A AHU 2A-A TEMP 5 1259 2-TS-031-441C-A 480V BD RM 2A AHU 2A-A TEMP 5 1260 2-TS-031-447A-B 480V ELEC BD RM 2B AHU 2B-B TEMP 5 1261 2-TWS-067-0439-A TRAVELING SCREEN 2A-A 0 1262 2-TWS-067-0451-B TRAVELING SCREEN 2B-B 0 1263 O-AHU-031-44 SHUTDOWN BD RM B AHU B-A 5 1264 O-FCO-031-338 EBR AHU D-B MODULATING DAMPER 5 Page 93 of 451

Appendix C: Base List 2 This Appendix includes the Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 2. Page 94 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 2 No. UNID Description 1 WBN-0-HTX-078-0031 SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER A 2 WBN-0-HTX-078-0032 SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER B 3 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0201C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-2 4 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0202C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-7 5 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0203C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-8 6 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0204C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-10 7 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0205C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-11 8 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0206C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-13 9 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0207B ISOL VLV TO 0-PI-78-14 10 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0208B ISOL VLV TO 0-PI-78-15 11 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0209B ISOL VLV TO FI-78-16 12 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0209C/H ISOL VLV TO FI-78-16 13 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0210B ISOL VLV TO FI-78-16 14 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0210C/L ISOL VLV TO FI-78-16 15 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0211C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-21 16 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0212C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-22 17 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0213C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-23 18 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0214C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-24 19 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0215C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-25 20 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0216C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-26 21 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0217C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-27 22 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0218C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-29 23 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0219C ISOL VLV TO PDI-78-30 24 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0219D/H ISOL VLV TO PDI-78-30 25 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0220C ISOL VLV TO PDI-78-30 26 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0220D/L ISOL VLV TO PDI-78-30 27 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0223C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-37 28 WBN-0-ISIV-078-0224C ISOL VLV TO PI-78-38 29 WBN-0-ISV-078-0501-A SFP CIRC PUMP A-A SUCT ISOL 30 WBN-0-ISV-078-0502-B SFP CIRC PUMP B-B SUCT ISOL 31 WBN-0-ISV-078-0513 COOL LOOP ISOLATION VLV 32 WBN-0-ISV-078-0514-S SFP DEMIN WATER MAKE-UPISOL 33 WBN-0-ISV-078-0516-S SFP CASK LOAD AREA SUP ISOL 34 WBN-0-ISV-078-0517-A SFP COOLING HDR A SUP TO SFP DEMIN/FILTER 35 WBN-0-ISV-078-0518-B SFP COOLING HDR B SUP TO SFP DEMIN/FILTER 36 WBN-0-ISV-078-0519 SFP PUMP SUP TO CVCS HOLD-UP TANK 37 WBN-0-ISV-078-0521 SFP PUMP SUP TO SFP FILTER 38 WBN-0-ISV-078-0522 SFP PRIMARY WATER SUP ISOL 39 WBN-0-ISV-078-0523 SFP DEMIN SUP TO SFP FILTER 40 WBN-0-ISV-078-0524 SFP FILTER INLET ISOL 41 WBN-0-ISV-078-0525 SFP FILTER OUTLET ISOL 42 WBN-0-ISV-078-0526 SFP DEMINERALIZER INLET ISOL 43 WBN-0-ISV-078-0528 SFP DEMINERALIZER RESIN FILL CONN ISOL Page 95 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 2 No. UNID Description 44 WBN-0-ISV-078-0530 SFP DEMINERALIZER RESIN DISCH ISOL 45 WBN-0-ISV-078-0532 SFP DEMIN SUP FROM REFLG WTR PURIF PUMPS 46 WBN-0-ISV-078-0533 SFP DEMINERALIZER OUTLET ISOL 47 WBN-0-ISV-078-0535 REFLG WATER PURIF FLTR SUP ISOL 48 WBN-0-ISV-078-0536 SFP REFLG WATER PURIF FILTER B INLET ISOL 49 WBN-0-ISV-078-0537 SFP REFLG WATER PURIF FILTER A INLET ISOL 50 WBN-0-ISV-078-0542 SFP REFLG WATER PURIF FILTER B OUTLET ISOL 51 WBN-O-ISV-078-0543 SFP REFLG WATER PURIF FILTER A OUTLET ISOL 52 WBN-0-ISV-078-0544 REFLG WATER PUMP FLTR SUP TO CVCS HUT 53 WBN-0-ISV-078-0547 FUEL TRANSFER CANAL SUP ISOL 54 WBN-0-ISV-078-0549-B REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP B-B DISCH ISOL 55 WBN-0-ISV-078-0550-A REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP A-A DISCH ISOL 56 WBN-O-ISV-078-0555-B REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP B-B SUCT ISOL 57 WBN-0-ISV-078-O556-A REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP A-A SUCT ISOL 58 WBN-0-ISV-078-0564 REFLG WTR PURIF PMP SUCT HDR ISOL 59 WBN-0-ISV-078-0568 FUEL TRANSFER CANAL CVCS SUP ISOL 60 WBN-0-ISV-078-0569 SFP SKIMMER PUMP SUCT ISOL 61 WBN-0-ISV-078-0570 SFP SKIMMER PUMP SUCT CLEANING CONN 62 WBN-O-ISV-078-0574 SFP SKIMMER FILTER INLET ISOL 63 WBN-O-ISV-078-0577 SFP SKIMMER FILTER OUTLET ISOL 64 WBN-0-ISV-078-0581-S SFP CIRC PUMP C-S TR A SUCT ISOL 65 WBN-0-ISV-078-0582-S SFP CIRC PUMP C-S TR B SUCT ISOL 66 WBN-0-ISV-078-0587-S SFP CIRC PUMP C-S TR B DISCH ISOL 67 WBN-0-ISV-078-0588-S SFP CIRC PUMP C-S TR A DISCH ISOL 68 WBN-0-ISV-078-0589 REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP DISCH HDR ISOL 69 WBN-0-ISV-078-0590-S REFLG WATER PURIF PUMP TO SPENT FUEL PIT ISOL 70 WBN-0-MTR-078-0001 SPENT FUEL PIT SKIMMER PMP 71 WBN-0-MTR-078-0009-B SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP B-B 72 WBN-0-MTR-078-0012-A SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP A-A 73 WBN-0-MTR-078-0019-A REFULING WATER PURIFICATION PMP A 74 WBN-0-MTR-078-0020-B REFUEL WTR PURl PMP BB 75 WBN-0-MTR-078-0035-S SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP C-S 76 WBN-0-MTR-078-0155 SPENT FUEL PIT SKIMMERS (2) 77 WBN-0-PMP-078-0001 SPENT FUEL PIT SKIMMER PUMP 78 WBN-0-PMP-078-0009-B SPENT FUEL PIT CIRC PUMP B-B 79 WBN-0-PMP-078-0012-A SPENT FUEL PIT CIRC PUMP A-A 80 WBN-0-PMP-078-0019 REFUELING WATER PURIFICATION PUMP A 81 WBN-0-PMP-078-0020 REFUELING WATER PURIFICATION PUMP B 82 WBN-0-PMP-078-0035-S SPENT FUEL PIT CIRC PUMP C-S 83 WBN-0-PNL-078-L208 SPENT FUEL PIT PMP C PNL 84 WBN-0-PNL-078-L370 SPENT FUEL PIT PNL 85 WBN-0-TE-078-0004 SPENT FUEL PIT WATER TEMP 86 WBN-0-TI-078-0017 SFP HEAT EXCHANGER B OUTLET TEMP Page 96 of 451

Watts Bar Unit 1 Base List 2 No. UNID Description 87 WBN-O-TI-078-0018 SFP HEAT EXCHANGER A OUTLET TEMP 88 WBN-O-TIS-078-0004 SPENT FUEL PIT WATER TEMP 89 WBN-O-TUBE-078-B RECORD ID 90 WBN-O-XS-078-0036A-A SFP CIRC PUMP C-S NORM PWR XFER SW 91 WBN-O-XS-078-0036B-B SFP CIRC PUMP C-S ALT PWR XFER SW 92 WBN-O-XSW-078-0036-S SFP CIRC PUMP C-S XFER SW Page 97 of 451

Appendix D: SWELs and Area List This Appendix includes the Watts Bar Unit 1 SWELs and Area List. Page 98 of 451

Watts Bar Seismic Walkdown Equipment List I Created By: " LWL-faJ~nT~r~ Approved By: 

                                                                                                                                      *     **.                        ______        -       ~      _______

isk Siificant New or Safety Aea Anhan re Date Item # Class to ,Iciption Srtem- BLDG Eirv tye M/ Replaced t Functionsf$ forhP(t6E Walkby Completed Notes 1 0 VIWN.-RE-090..20-A MCR EMERG AR INTAKE RADIATION MONITOR 090 C.TL BL)G 755 S 046 0110/12 2 2 0 WBN-1.-ACUM-063-0003 SISCOLD LEGACCUMULATOR 3 063 RB 716 102.5 (_49 09/17/12 2 3 0 WON-1.CONO-031,.o90-A ARMECHEQROOM CONDENSER UNIT IA-A 031 AUXSLOG 72 S 047 08/13/12 2 4 0 WBN-1-PMO.-030-0176-B RHRPUMP IB-B ROOM COOLER 030 AUXBLDG 676 5 004 07/18/12 2 5 0 WBN-1-STN-0670009A ESSENTIAL RAW COOUNG WATERSTRAINER .A-A 067 IPSBLDG 722 5 011 07/24/32 2&3 6 0 W8N.-ITANK.082-O160-A DIESEL GEN ENGINElA1 STARTAIRRECEIVER A 082 DCBLOG 742 0 001 07/17/12 2 &3 7 1 WBN-1-MCC-213,A001-A REACTOR MOV BOARDEA1-A 213 AUXBLDG 772 0 030 08/03/12 2 8 1 WeNB-M1-CC-214-AOI-A 480V C&ABUIING VElNT BOARD1A1-A 214 AUXBLDG 757 Y 0 003 07/26/12 2 9 1 W8N-.VMCC-214,A002-A 4B8V CONT & AUXBLDGVENT60 LA2-A 214 AUX8106 757 0 003 08/08/12 2 10 1 WBN.I-MCC-21S-AD0G-A DIESEL AUXPOWER BOARD1AI-A 215 DGBLDG 760 0 031 03/06/12 2 11 1 WSN-1-MCC-232-8 REACTOR VENTBOARD1"-8 232 AUXBLDG 772 0 014 08/03/12 2 12 2 WBN-1.BO-212-AOO1-A 480V SHUTDOWN BOARD1A1-A 212 AUXBLDG 757 Y 0 003 07/18/12 2 13 2 WBN-1-BD-212-A002-A 480V SHUTDOWN BOARD1A2-A 212 AUXBLDG 757 Y 0 01C 08/03/12 2 14 2 WBN-1.-D-212-BO01-B 480V SHUTDOWN BOARD181-B 212 AUXBLDG 757 0 040 08/09/12 2 is 2 W8N91-60-212-B102-6 480V SHUTDOWN BOARD162-6 212 AUXBLDG 757 0O 040 O8/09/12 2 i6 3 WSN-1-00-211-A-A 6.9KVSHUTDOWN BOARDIA-A 211 AUx BLOG 757 Y 0 01C 07/26/12 2&3 17 3 WBN-1-B0-211-B-B 6.9KVSHUTDOWN BOARD18-0 211 AUXBLOG 737 Y 0 038 08/08/.1 *2 &3 is 3 WaN.2-BD-211-A-A 6.SICSHUTDOWN BOARDZA-A 211 AUXBLG 7S7 0 015 08/08/12 2&3 19 3 WON-2-BD-211.B-B 6.9KVSHtJTDOWN BOARD2B-8 211 AUXBLDG 7?7 0 038 08/08/22 2&3 20 4 WBN-1-DX-237-A INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 1A 237 AUXBLDG 737 0 016 08103/12 2 21 4 WBN-1-OXF-237-B INSTRUMENT POWER TRANSFORMER 1B 237 AUXBLDG 7s7 0 039 08/08/12 2 22 4 WBN-1.OXF-242-O001 RADMONITORING ANDSAMPULNG POWER IFMR 242 AUX8LDG 757 0 003 07/18/12 2 23 4 WBN-1-oXF-068-0341A-A PZRBACXUPHTRGRP2A-A TRANSFORMER 068 AUXBLDG 782 2 043 09/17/12 2 24 4 WBN-1-OXF.08,-0341F PZRCONTROL HTRGRP 1D TRANSFORMER 068 AUXBLDG 782 2 043 09/17/12 2

2. 4 WBN-1-OXF-212-A002-A 480V SHUTDOWN BOARDTRANSFORMER IA2-A 212 Aux-BLDG 772 1 0 013 07/26/12 2& 3 26 4 WBN-1-OXF-212-B002-B 4B0V SHUTDOWN BOARDTRANSFORMER 112-8 212 ATUX BLDG 772 Y 0 019 07/26112 2&3 27 5 WBNO-PMP-070-00S1-S CCS PUMP C-S 070 AUXBLDG 713 Y 4 . 008 07123/12 2&3 28 seesL 2 jarlt 23.

29e imSWEL 2/or Drem29., S-- I - P 00;1--3-MP.-00 IA-

  • TOAUXFEEDWWATER PUMP 1A'- 003 AUXBLDG 692 Y 4 042 08/09/12 2&3 31 5 WBN-1-PMP-003-0128-B AUXFEEOWATER PMP 1B-B 003 AUXSLOG 713 Y 4 003 07/23/12 2& 3 32 5 WBN-1-PMP-062-0108-A CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP IA-A 062 AUXBLDG 692 Y 1.3.4 006 07/23/12 263 33 5 WBN-1-PMP-063-0015-8 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 1B.3 063 AUXBLDG 692 L3,4 007 07/23/12 2&3 34 6 WBN-1.PMP-067-0431 ERCWSCREEN WASH PUMP lA-A 067 IPSBLDG 741 5 012 07/24/12 263
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   &

35 6 WBN-I-PMP-067-0440 ERCWSCREENWASH PUMP 1B- 067 IP$BLDG 741 S 012 07/24/12 2&3 36 5 WBN-1-PMP-D7D-0131-A CCSTHERMAL BARRIER BOOSTERPUMP IA-A 070 AUXBLDG 737 43 024 08/01/12 2 &3 37 6 WBN-0-PMP-067-0028-A ERCWPUMP A-A 067 IPSBLDG 741 Y 5 010 07/24/12 2& 3 38 6 WBN.0-PMP-067.0035-A ERCWPUMP C-A 067 IP BLD); 741 v 5 010 07)24/12 2 &3 39 6 WBN-0-PMP-067.0047-B ERCWPUMP E-B 067 IPSBLDG 741 Y 5 009 07/24/122 2& 3 40 6 W11N-1-P-MP-074-0020-8 RHRPUMP 18.5 074 AUXBLOG 676 1.3,4 004 07/18/12 2 41 7 WBN--ICV-032-0*82-A ' ESSENT CONTROL AIRTRA RMFLOWISOL' 03Z AUXBLDG 757 5 026 08/06/12 42 7 WBN-1-FCV-062-O0M9 CVCSCHARGING HEADER/RCPSEALINJFLOWCNTL 062 AUXBLOG 692 35 006 08/07/12 43 7 WBN.1.FCV.O62-OC93 CVCSCHARGING HEADER FLOW/PZRLEVELCONTROL 062 AUXBLDG 692 Y 3 033 08/07112 1 44 7 WBN-I-FCV-063-0048- , SAFETY I,) PUMP 184 SUCTIONISOLATION 063 AUXBLDG 692 1.3.4 007 08/06/12 Page 99 of 451

Risk Significant New or Safety Enhanced Area Date Item # Class ID Description System BLDG ELEV (Yes/No/NA) Replaced Functions for IPEEE Walkby Completed Notes 45 7 WBN-1-FCV-067-0213-A SFP/TBBP SPACE CLR1A ERCW SUP FLOW CNTL 067 AUXBLDG 737 S 024 08/01/12 46 7 WBN-1-FCV-067-0215-B SFP/TBBP SPACE CLR 1B ERCW SUP FLOW CNTL 067 AUXBLDG 737 5 024 08/01/12 47 8 WBN-1-FCV-063-0175-B SI PUMP 1B-B MINI FLOW RECIRC TO RWST 063 AUXBLDG 692 3,4 007 07/23/12 48 8 WBN-1-FCV-074-0021-B RHR PUMP 1B-B SUCTION 074 AUXBLDG 676 1 1,3,4 004 07/18/12 49 8 WBN-1-FSV-031-0447-B 480V BD RM 1B REFRIGERANT LINEFSV 031 AUXBLDG 786 5 032 08/06/12 50 8 WBN-1-LCV-062-0135-A RWST CVCSSUPPLY HDR ISOLATION 062 AUXBLDG 692 1,3 034 08/06/12 51 8 WBN-1-LCV-062-0136-B RWST CVCSSUPPLY HDR ISOLATION 062 AUXBLDG 692 1,3 034 08/06/12 52 9 WBN-1-FAN-030-0038-A CNTMT AIR RETURN FAN 1A-A 030 RB 716 2 049 09/17/12 2 53 9 WBN-1-FAN-030-0447-A DG 1A-A ROOM EXHAUST FAN 1A 030 DG BLDG 760 Y 5 020 07/31/12 2 &3 54 9 WBN-1-FAN-030-0449-B DG 1B-B ROOM EXHAUST FAN 1B 030 DG BLDG 760 Y 5 002 07/17/12 2 &3 55 9 WBN-1-FAN-030-0459-A DIESELGEN 1A-A ELECTBD ROOM EXHAUST FAN 030 DGBLDG 760 Y 5 020 07/31/12 2 &3 56 10 WBN-0-AHU-031-0012-A MAIN CONTROL ROOM AHU A-A 031 CNTL BLDG 755 5 046 08/10/12 2 &3 57 10 WBN-0-AHU-031-0045 SHUTDOWN BOARD ROOM AIR HANDLING UNIT A-A 031 AUXBLDG 757 5 041 08/09/12 2 58 10 WBN-1-AHU-031-0461-A 480V BD ROOM 1A SUPPLY AHU 1A-A 031 AUXBLDG 772 5 047 08/10/12 2 59 11 WBN-0-CHR-031-0036/2-A SHUTDOWN BOARD ROOM CHILLERA-A 031 AUXBLDG 737 5 013 07/25/12 2&3 60 11 WBN-O-CHR-031-0049/2-B SHUTDOWN BOARD ROOM CHILLERB-B 031 AUXBLDG 737 5 036 08/07/12 2 &3 61 11 WBN-0-CHR-031-0080-A MAIN CONTROL ROOM CHILLERA-A 031 AUXBLDG 737 5 013 07/25/12 2 62 11 WBN-0-CHR-031-0128 ELECTRICAL BOARD ROOM CHILLERA-A 031 CNTL BLDG 692 5 037 08/07/12 2 63 11 WBN-0-CHR-031-0129 ELECTRICAL BOARD ROOM CHILLERB-B 031 CNTL BLDG 692 5 037 08/07/12 2 64 12 WBN-0-COMP-032-0026 STATION AIRCOMPRESSOR B 032 TURB BLDG 708 Y 5 035 08/13/12 2 &3 65 12 WBN-0-COMP-032-0060 AUXCONTROL AIRCOMPRESSOR A-A 032 AUXBLDG 757 Y 5 026 08/02/12 2 &3 66 12 WBN-0-COMP-032-0086 AUXCONTROL AIRCOMPRESSOR B-B 032 AUXBLDG 757 Y 5 026 08/02/12 2 &3 67 12 WBN-1-COMP-082-0180 DG 1A-A AIRSTART COMPRESSOR 1 082 DGBLDG 742 0 001 07/17/12 2 &3 68 12 WBN-1-COMP-082-0210 DG 18-B AIR START COMPRESSOR 1 082 DG BLDG 742 0 021 07/31/12 2 &3 69 13 WBN-1-GEN-085-A CONTROL ROD DRIVE M-G SET 1A 085 AUXBLDG 782 1 025 08/02/12 2 &3 70 13 WBN-1-GEN-085-B CONTROL ROD DRIVEM-G SET 1B 085 AUXBLDG 782 1 02S 08/02/12 2&3 71 14 WBN-O-BD-236-0001/1-D 125V VITALBATTERYBOARD I PANEL I 236 AUX BLDG 757 Y 0 016 07/26/12 2 72 14 WBN-0-DBD-238-0003 DISTRIBUTION BD PNL 3 120 VACPREFERRED 238 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 08/10/12 2 73 14 WBN-0-DPL-236-O001-D 125V VITALBTRY 0DI DISTRIBUTION PANEL 0 236 AUX BLDG 757 0 016 07/26/12 2 74 14 WBN-O-XSW-236-68DC2-S 125V DCTRANSFER SWITCH, SELECTBATTERY BOARDS 1/11 236 AUX BLDG 772 Y 0 014 07/25/12 2& 3 75 14 WBN-O-XSW-236-79DC1-S 125V DCTRANSFER SWITCH, SELECTCHARGERS 7S/9S 236 AUXBLDG 772 Y 0 017 07/26/12 2&3 76 14 WBN-1-BD-235-0001-D 120V AC VITALINSTR POWER BOARD 1-1 235 AUXBLDG 757 Y 0 016 07/26/12 2 77 14 WBN-1-BD-278-MO07B 120V AC INSTRUMENT POWER RACK 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 78 15 WBN-0-BAT-236-0001-D 125V VITALBATTERYI 236 AUX BLDG 772 Y 0 027 08/02/12 2 79 iS WBN-0-BAT-236-0002-E 125V VITALBATTERYII 236 AUX BLDG 772 Y 0 028 08/02/12 2 80 15 WBN-0-BAT-236-0003-F 125V VITALBATTERYIII 236 AUXBLDG 772 0 029 08/02/12 2 81 15 WBN-1-BAT-215-A-A 125V DIESELGENERATOR BATTERY1A-A 215 DG BLDG 742 0 001 07/18/12 2 82 15 WBN-1-BAT-215-B-B 125V DIESELGENERATOR BATTERY1B-B 215 DG BLDG 742 0 021 07/31/12 2 83 16 WBN-0-CHGR-236-0001-D 125V VITALBATTERYCHARGER I 236 AUXBLDG 772 Y Y 0 014 07/25/12 2 &3 84 16 WBN-0-CHGR-236-0003-F 125V VITALBATTERYCHARGER III 236 AUXBLDG 772 Y Y 0 017 07/26/12 2 &3 85 16 WBN-0-INV-235-0001-D 120V ACVITALINSTR INVERTER 0-1 235 AUX BLDG 772 Y 0 014 07/25/12 2 &3 86 16 WBN-1-CHGR-215-A-A DG 1A-A BATTERYCHARGER 21S DGBLDG 742 0 001 08/06/12 2 87 16 WBN-1-INV-235-0001-D 120V AC VITALINVERTER 1-1 235 AUXBLDG 772 Y Y 0 014 07/25/12 2 &3 88 16 WBN-1-INV-235-0002-E 120VAC VITALINVERTER 1-11 235 AUXBLDG 772 Y Y 0 014 08/08/12 2 &3 89 16 WBN-1-INV-235-0003-F 120V AC VITALINVERTER 1-111 235 AUXBLDG 772 Y Y 0 017 07/26/12 2 &3 90 17 WBN-1-DIEG-082-A1-A DIESELGENERATOR ENGINE 1A1 082 DG BLDG 742 0 001 07/17/12 2 &3 Page 100 of 451

Risk Significant New or Safety Enhanced Area Date Item # Class ID Description System BLDG ELEV (Yes/No/NA) Replaced Functions for IPEEE Walkby Completed Notes 91 17 WBN-1-DIEG-082-A2-A DIESELGENERATOR ENGINE 1A2 082 DG BLDG 742 0 001 07/17/12 2&3 92 17 WBN-1-DIEG-082-B1-B DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE 1B1 082 DG BLDG 742 0 021 07/31/12 2&3 93 17 WBN-1-DIEG-082-B2-B DIESELGENERATOR ENGINE 1B2 082 DG BLDG 742 0 021 07/31/12 2&3 94 17 WBN-1-GEN-082-0001A-A DIESEL GENERATOR 1A-A 082 DG BLDG 742 Y 0 001 07/17/12 2&3 95 17 WBN-1-GEN-082-O001B-B DIESELGENERATOR 11-B 082 DG BLDG 742 Y 0 021 07/31/12 2&3 96 17 WBN-2-GEN-082-0002A-A DIESEL GENERATOR 2A-A 082 DG BLDG 742 0 022 07/31/12 2&3 97 17 WBN-2-GEN-082-0002B-B DIESEL GENERATOR 2B-B 082 DG BLDG 742 0 023 07/31/12 2&3 98 18 WBN-0-L-147/C INSTRUMENT RACK(1-PI-67-434) 067 IPS BLDG 722 5 011 07/24/12 2 99 18 WBN-0-L-155 INSTRUMENT RACK(0-PI-70-49 & 0-PT-70-222C) 070 AUXBLDG 713 4,5 008 07/23/12 2 100 18 WBN-1-PNL-275-R127-A TRAIN A BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 275 CNTL BLDG 708 0 048 08/13/12 2 101 18 WBN-1-PNL-275-R143-A TRAIN A BOP INSTRUMENT RACK 275 CNTL BLDG 708 0 048 08/13/12 2 102 18 WBN-1-PNL-278-M7 TRANSFER, PFD PWR, AND INSTRUMENT PWR RACKS(1-M-7) 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 103 19 WBN-0-TS-030-0192B-A SFP PUMP/TBBP SPACE COOLER A-A TEMP 030 AUXBLDG 737 5 024 08/01/12 2 104 19 WBN-1-TS-001-0017A-A TDAUXFEEDWATER PMP ROOM TEMP 001 AUX BLDG 692 4,5 042 08/09/12 2 105 19 WBN-1-TS-030-0179-B SIS PUMP 1B-B ROOM COOLER TEMP 030 AUX BLDG 692 5 007 07/23/12 2 106 19 WBN-1-TS-030-0183-A CENT CHARGING PUMP 1A-A RM COOLER TEMP 030 AUX BLDG 692 5 006 08/09/12 2 107 19 WBN-1-TS-030-0453A-B DG 1B-B ROOM EXHAUST HIGH TEMP 030 DGBLDG 760 5 002 07/17/12 2 108 19 WBN-1-TS-030-5237A-A RHRPUMP RM B HI TEMP SW 030 AUXBLDG 676 5 004 07/18/12 2 109 20 WBN-0-PNL-278-M012 RADIATION MONITORING MCR PNL 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 110 20 WBN-0-PNL-278-MO26A-A D.G. 1A-A MCR PNL 278 CNTLBLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 111 20 WBN-0-PNL-278-MO26D-B D.G. 28-B MCR PNL 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 112 20 WBN-0-PNL-278-MO27A ERCW MCR PNL 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 113 20 WBN-0-PNL-278-M027B CCS MCR PNL 278 CNTL BLDG 755 0 005 07/19/12 2 114 21 WBN-0-HTX-070-0186 CCS HEAT EXCHANGER C 070 AUXBLDG 737 V 4,5 013 07/25/12 2 115 See SWEL 2for Item 115. 116 See SWEL 2for Item 116. 117 21 WBN-1-HTX-070-0185 CCSHEAT EXCHANGER A 070 AUX BLDG 737 Y 4,5 013 07/25/12 2 118 21 WBN-1-TANK-063-0046 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK 063 YARD 729 Y 1 044 08/10/12 2&3 119 21 WBN-1-TANK-068-PRT PRESSURIZER RELIEFTANK 068 RB 708 2,4 045 09/17/12 2 &3 120 21 WBN-1-TANK-070-0001 CCS SURGE TANK A 070 AUX BLDG 757 4.5 026 08/02/12 2&3 Notes:

2. Has anchorage
3. Detailed anchorage inspection to be performed Safety Function(s):

0 - Support Function 1 - Reactivity Control 2 - RCS Pressure Control 3 - RCS Inventory Control 4 - Decay Heat Removal 5 - Containment Isolation Page 101 of 451

Watts Bar Seismic Walkdown Equipment List 2 Created By: Approved By: Risk Significant New or Safety Enhanced Area Date Item # Class ID Description System BLDG ELEV (Yes/No/NA) Replaced Functions for IPEEE Walkby Completed Notes 28 5 WBN-0-PMP-078-0009-8 SPENT FUELPIT CIRCPUMP B-B 078 AUXBLDG 737 0 024 08/01/12 2& 3 29 5 WBN-O-PMP-078-G035-S SPENT FUELPIT CIRCPUMP C-S 078 AUXBLDG 737 0 024 08/01/12 2 &3 115 21 WBN-O-HTX-078-0031 SPENT FUELPIT HEAT EXCHANGER A 078 AUXBLDG 737 0 024 08/01/12 2 &3 116 21 WBN-O-HTX-078-0032 SPENT FUELPITHEAT EXCHANGER B 078 AUXBLDG 737 0 024 08/01/12 2 &3 Notes:

2. Has anchorage
3. Detailed anchorage inspection to be performed Safety Function(s):

0 - Support Function 1 - Reactivity Control 2 - RCS Pressure Control 3 - RCS Inventory Control 4 - Decay Heat Removal 5 - Containment Isolation Page 102 of 451

Area Walkby ID Building Elevation Additional Descriptor WBN-WB-001 DG BLDG 742 DIESEL GENERATOR 1A-A, ROOM D104 WBN-WB-002 DG BLDG 760 AIR EXHAUST ROOM, ROOM D209 WBN-WB-003 AUX BLDG 757 SHUTDOWN BOARD A, ROOM A802 WBN-WB-004 AUX BLDG 676 RHR PUMP 1B-B, ROOM A210 WBN-WB-005 CNTL BLDG 755 MAIN CONTROL ROOM, ROOM C412 WBN-WB-006 AUX BLDG 692 CENTRIFIGUAL CHARGING PUMP lA-A, ROOM A309 WBN-WB-007 AUX BLDG 692 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP 1B-B, ROOM A312 WBN-WB-008 AUX BLDG 713 AREA BOUNDED BY A1-T/A5-R WBN-WB-009 IPS BLDG 741 ERCW PUMP ROOM B, ROOM 1109 WBN-WB-010 IPS BLDG 741 ERCW PUMP ROOM A, ROOM 1105 WBN-WB-011 IPS BLDG 722 ERCW STRAINER, ROOM 1110 WBN-WB-012 IPS BLDG 741 ERCW TRAVELING SCREEN, ROOM 1107 WBN-WB-013 AUX BLDG 737 AREA BOUNDED BY A2-QOA13-U WBN-WB-014 AUX BLDG 772 480V BOARD ROOM 1B, ROOM A852 WBN-WB-015 AUX BLDG 757 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD ROOM A, ROOM A802 WBN-WB-016 AUX BLDG 757 125V VITAL BATTERY BOARD ROOM I, ROOM A804 WBN-WB-017 AUX BLDG 772 480V BOARD ROOM 2B, ROOM A864 WBN-WB-018 AUX BLDG 772 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1A, ROOM A856 WBN-WB-019 AUX BLDG 772 480V TRANSFORMER ROOM 1B, ROOM A855 WBN-WB-020 DG BLDG 760 AIR EXHAUST ROOM, ROOM D203 WBN-WB-021 DG BLDG 742 DIESEL GENERATOR lB-B, ROOM D106 WBN-WB-022 DG BLDG 742 DIESEL GENERATOR 2A-A, ROOM D105 WBN-WB-023 DG BLDG 742 DIESEL GENERATOR 2B-B, ROOM D107 WBN-WB-024 AUX BLDG 737 SPENT FUEL PIT HTX AND PUMPS WBN-WB-025 AUX BLDG 782 CONTROL ROD DRIVE ROOM, ROOM A901 WBN-WB-026 AUX BLDG 757 REFUELING ROOM, ROOM A813 WBN-WB-027 AUX BLDG 772 125V VITAL BATTERY ROOM I, ROOM A854 WBN-WB-028 AUX BLDG 772 125V VITAL BATTERY ROOM II, ROOM A853 WBN-WB-029 AUX BLDG 772 125V VITAL BATTERY ROOM III, ROOM A864 WBN-WB-030 AUX BLDG 772 480V BOARD ROOM 1A, ROOM A851 WBN-WB-031 DG BLDG 760 480V BOARD ROOM 1A, ROOM D204 WBN-WB-032 AUX BLDG 786 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM 1B, ROOM A924 WBN-WB-033 AUX BLDG 692 CENTRIFIGUAL CHARGING PUMP lB-B, ROOM A310 WBN-WB-034 AUX BLDG 692 UNIT 1 PENETRATION ROOM, ROOM A307 WBN-WB-035 TURB BLDG 708 RADIUS AROUND COLUMN T7-K WBN-WB-036 AUX BLDG 737 RADIUS AROUND COLUMN A13-R WBN-WB-037 CNTL BLDG 692 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM, ROOM Cl10 WBN-WB-038 AUX BLDG 757 6.9KV SHUTDOWN BOARD ROOM B, ROOM A824 WBN-WB-039 AUX BLDG 757 125V VITAL BATTERY BOARD ROOM II, ROOM A803 WBN-WB-040 AUX BLDG 757 480V BOARD ROOM 1B WBN-WB-041 AUX BLDG 757 UNIT 1 PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS AREA, ROOM A809 WBN-WB-042 AUX BLDG 692 TURBINE DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP 1A-S, ROOM A306 WBN-WB-043 AUX BLDG 782 TRAIN A PRESSURIZER HEATER TRANSFORMER RM, ROOM A902 WBN-WB-044 YARD 729 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK WBN-WB-045 RB 708 LOWER CONTAINMENT, PRT WBN-WB-046 CNTL BLDG 755 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM, C401 WBN-WB-047 AUX BLDG 772 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM 1A, ROOM A857 WBN-WB-048 CNTL BLDG 708 UNIT 1 AUXILIARY INSTRUMENT ROOM, ROOM C201 WBN-WB-049 RB 716 LOWER CONTAINMENT, ACCUMULATOR 3 Page 103 of 451

Appendix E: SWCs The following signatures are provided for the engineers responsible for the Seismic Walkdown Checklists in Watts Bar Unit 1. Name Signature Date Travis Hockenberry (o/g,2 2.,o Mike Gordon I Phillip York 110/ Page 104 of 451

Status: YE NE] U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-RE-090-0205-A Equip. Class3 0, Other Equipment Description MCR Emergency Air Intake Radiation Monitor Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C401, WBN-WB-046 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEl No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI- UOI N/A--

All items are present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[-] N/A--

oxidation? All items are painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UZ-- N/A[

No significantcracks observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NEI Uil N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[-- U-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from"Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 105 of 451

Equipment ID No. o-RE-090-0205-A Equip. ClasS3 0, Other Equipment Description MCR Emergency Air Intake Radiation Monitor Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE-- N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NM U[- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry black walls. No ceiling tiles present. Lights have safety cables. All items overhead are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEi UEI N/AZl All electrical connections are flex type conduit. Top tube connection does not appearto be flexible enough. After furtherreview, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEl UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEI Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 106 of 451

St arus: YN NDý UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003 Equip. Class' Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEI UE- N/AI-Observed (1) missing anchor bolt nearpipe. This configurationis allowed per Note A of DWG 48N949.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AEl oxidation?

All surfaces painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UEF N/AE3
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UEI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE- UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 107 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-ACUM-063-0003 Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description SIS Cold Leg Accumulator 3 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U-1 N/A--
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE- N/A[-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 N[-E UE- N/AE3
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Congested area with some work in-progress.No areas for concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 108 of 451

Status: Y NEI UlI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-COND-031-0290-A Equip. Class' Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit 1A-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Ellis and Watts Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[O NDI UE-D N/AD No observed bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 oxidation?

Only mild surface oxidation was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NDI UD- N/AD No visible cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDI NDl UD- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 109 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-COND-03 1-0290-A Equip. Class' Equipment Description AB Mech. Eq. Room Condenser Unit IA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI1 N/AZ Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI U[:1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable trays rigidly mounted. No masonry block walls in the area. Conduit is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[1 N/AEl Small metal pipe attached to bottom of condenser unit does not appearto have any flexibility. Pipe is condensate drain pan drain and does not affect operability of equipment.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Duct sections located next to condenser appears to have adequate clearancesand utilizes expansion joints. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 110 of 451

St .tus: YE NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMCL-030-O176-B Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U[-1 N/Al!

All hardware/anchorsin place and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UI- N/AL!

oxidation? Mild surface corrosion present, but not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U-- N/All
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- N[-- UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NE-I UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 111 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-PMCL-030-0 176-B Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Room Cooler Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[I N/A[

Pipe nearby with 1"clearance and minimum 2" insulation (credible but not significant).

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NWI UW- N/AZ1 Attached piping has flexible hose/fittings. Conduit has flexible connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS N[,] UW-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NWI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 112 of 451

Status: YE N- UI-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A Equip. Class' Equipment Description ERCW Strainer 1A-A Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area /I10, WBN-WB-0 I1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) P.X. Engiineerinq Co. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI Ur- N/A[]

Nothing is missing or bent, broken, etc.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UiL N/Ar--

oxidation? Significantsurface corrosion,however base materialis intact.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI Ur] N/A[-1 No observed cracks
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED NEIl U- N/Ar-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 38N219.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI U'-

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Poor housekeeping, extremely wet environment, and neglected paint. Significantsurface corrosion. Still should meet seismic requirements. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 113 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-STN-067-0009-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description ERCW Strainer lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U-1 N/AZ Scaffolding on pressure boundary bolts. There are several areas of concern. They are credible, but not significant.(1) Drain pipe to scaffolding, (2) Pipe valve water operatorto scaffolding, (3) top cover plate bolts to scaffolding, (4) pipe valve in the vertical to the scaffolding.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U[:] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

SignificantAppendix R scaffolding is in place and has ample restraintto the building. No masonry walls present. Conduit is rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI U-1 N/A-1 All electrical connections are flexible. Tubing has adequate flexibility.

Piping is rigidly supported.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-- adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? All components are rigidly supported and guided. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is poorin this area. Significant degradationof protective coatings has occurred. Significant surface corrosionis present. Scaffolding is in direct contact with the equipment. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 114 of 451

s t a t us: Y[I NO UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine 1A 1 StartAir Receiver A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) McDaniel Tank Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEl- N UEI] N/AEl Loose nut on bottom south anchorstrap. Missing washer on bottom north anchor strap.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UE- N/AF-1 oxidation?

Corrosion observed on south bottom anchorwasher, surface corrosion only.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEIl U[- N/AEl Bolted to steel frame attached to diesel engine skid.
5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEl U-] N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWGs C80-0277-1 and 6036C07004.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI- NED UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 115 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-082-0160-A Equip. Class 3 0, Other Equipment Description Diesel Gen Engine IA 1 StartAir Receiver A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI U-- N/ADI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND-] UD- N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NDI UD-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Receiver factory steel name plate is loose on the sides. Could be a personnel hazard. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 116 of 451

Status: YE NEI UII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-213-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board 1A 1-1 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A851, WBN-WB-030 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI ULI N/A[1 All anchorageis in good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appearsto be 1/4"- 5/16"' Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE ULI N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted. There is minor surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NI-- U-] N/AEl There are no credible cracks. All appearto be legacy typical cracking for a floor.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZI NEI UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N--1 UD potentially adverse seismic .conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 117 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-213-AOOI-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor MOV Board IA 1-I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI U-- N/AE-Several support structures are in close proximity to flexible conduit connections. However, they have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE-1 UEr N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safety chained. No masonry walls present. All overhead items are rigidly supported. No ceiling tiles in the area. No Masonry block walls.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-1 U[-I N/AZI All conduit connections are flexible type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping barricadesin the area for work in progress. No adverse seismic conditions. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 118 of 451

Sta t us: YN NE-1 UL-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A I-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U-] N/AE Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition. No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure. Frontpanels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YNI NEI UE- N/AEJ oxidation?

Clean and painted (minor chipping).

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEI UI- N/AE No visible cracks in concrete or damage.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yf- NEI U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE1 Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 119 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[I N/A[

Overhead lighting restrainedwith safety chain/wire. Local emergency light restrainedadequately.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[E U'I N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Cable tray and piping rigidly supported.All in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE- N/AEl All electricalconnections through top of cabinet are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yl NEI UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE1 UE[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is clean and orderly. Temporary rolling scaffolding noted previously in area walk-by still in same condition tied-off in 1 spot instead of 2. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 120 of 451

Sta t us: YN NEI1 ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N[E of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEI UL] N/A[l Welded to embed plate in floor. All welds in good condition. No observed damage. Kick panels at base of MCC were removed on approximately 50-75% of the panels to verify the bolting details inside the enclosure. Frontpanels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UE-1 N/AZl oxidation?

Some chippedpaint. Mild surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UEl N/AZ Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significant observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-] NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE] U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 121 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V C&A Building Vent Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS N[Z] UD1 N/AZ All items appearto have adequate clearance.All items above are rigidly mounted.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE-Z UI] N/AZ-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All items above are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS N[Z] U-- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEJ U[-.

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 122 of 451

St atus: YN N[-] Ur-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board 1A 1-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D204, WBN-WB-031 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UI- N/ALE MCC is welded to embed plates (visually observed on outside of MCC only). No observed issues. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels required extensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI Ur] N/ALl oxidation?

Mild chipping of paint is present with mild surface corrosion. No adverse seismic conditions.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U[-] N/A[]

No significantcracking observed. Floor cracking at the embeds is present but typical for this arrangement.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-- NO-- U-] N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI-Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 123 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 1, MCCs and Wall-Mounted Contactors Equipment Description 480V Diesel Auxiliary Power Board IA 1-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE-1 U[-] N/AZ All connections and switches on the front of the MCC are clear of impact.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YMI NEI Uli N/AZI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Reinforced masonry block wall is present and in good condition. Overhead temperature sensor TS-13-132B does not have a safety cable (housekeeping). All else looks good.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEI N/AZl Electricalconnections are all flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UEZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in the area is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 124 of 451

Sa,.,s: Y-I NO U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board lB-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Imperial Corporation Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UL] N/All All anchorage is in good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Welded to embed. Full length weld on outside of cabinet, appearsto be 1/4"- 5/16". Kick panels removed on 50-75% of the panels to visually observe bolts in base of MCC. Front panels could not be opened due to sensitive equipment that is utilized in all modes of operation. Back panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UI- N/AEl oxidation?

Painted with some minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE- N/AZl No observed cracking >0.5mm near embed plate. Cracking present typical of concrete floor, nothing of significance or concern.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 125 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-MCC-232-B-B Equip. Class 3 1, MCC and Wall Mounted Contactors Equipment Description Reactor Vent Board 1B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YDI NZ U-1 N/A[-]

Cap plate of cable tray support in contact with conduit collar on top of cabinet (Panel8).

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI Ur- N/AD.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition. Lighting has safety chain/wire. (One light previously noted in walk-by does not have safety chain.)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UDI N/AD1 Conduit connections on top of MCC cabinet are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-I NS UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NDI UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? No temporary equipment or scaffolding in immediate vicinity (within 5 ft) Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 126 of 451

S t .a.u: Y[ NEI1 UL-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO01-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[W NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U[] N/A[Z Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UW- N/AZl oxidation?

Welds painted and observed bolts in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UW- N/AZ No visible cracks in weld.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U- N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y NZlU[--

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 127 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AOO1-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A 1-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UM N/AZ Clearance of -5' maintainedaround cabinet.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Piping and cable tray rigidly supported and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE- N/AZ Attached conduit is rigidly supported, cables free to move inside. All other have flexible connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEJ UZ-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UrZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Doors closed, no missing bolts or panels. Scaffolding located near south end of cabinet.Appears to be supportedproperly/adequately. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Phillip York 9-28-2012 Page 128 of 451

S Y ND UI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO02-A Equip. Class3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and BreakerPanels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoragze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE- N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N[-1 UE- N/AZ oxidation?

All surface painted and in good condition. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/AZ No cracks observed of significance. Cracks typical for a concrete floor.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE U[-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No areas of concern. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 129 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltaqe Switchqearand Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1A2-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI- N/A-Good clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD NEI UM- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safely chained. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE! UI N/AZ Conduit connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UFZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) New scaffolding in the area added since WBN-WB-003 was completed. The scaffolding is adequately restrained.Also observed a sprinklerhead touching HVAC Duct Insulation. Duct and pipes are both rigidly supported and of no concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Phillip York 9-28-2012 Page 130 of 451

Sta*t.: YN N[-- U[1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BOO1-B Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgearand Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board IBI-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE] N/AZ Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YU NEI UE- N/AZ3 oxidation?

Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[:] N/AZ Normal cracks observed in the floor near the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ NEI UE] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 131 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BOO1-B Equip. Class 3 2. Low Voltaqe Switchqear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1BI-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NI- UE- N/AZ Soft targets are all clearof objects. All items in the area are well restrained.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[D NE-- U-- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? There is significant scaffolding in the area. It looks to have adequate clearance and is well restrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Phillio York 9-28-2012 Page 132 of 451

St atus: YZ NO U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BO02-B Equip. Class 3 2, Low Voltage Switchgear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area WBN-WB-040 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE- N/AE3 Outside of cabinet is welded to embed plate. Observed bolting to channel on inside of cabinet as well as panel to panel connections.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE] UE] N/AE3 oxidation?

Observed chipped paint and mild surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YER NEI UE] N/AZl Normal floor cracking observed at the embed plate. No significant cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE] N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 133 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-212-BO02-B Equip. Class3 2, Low Voltage Switch-gear and Breaker Panels Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board 1B2-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-1 All items in the area are well restrainedand soft targets have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEJ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it all has acceptable clearance and restraint. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Phillio York 9-28-2012 Page 134 of 451

St atus: YZ NE1 ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-A-A_ Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltaqe Switchqear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board IA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YID NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[-' N/Al All panels/cabinets opened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UF N/AZ oxidation?

No observed corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO U-I N/AF No visible cracks in concrete.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS NEI Ur N/AF-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG1 1846.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 135 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? . YO NEI U--1 N/AI-In close proximity to Reactor Coolant Pump Pot XFMR and Relay Panel.Appears to have adequate clearance to allow for differential displacement. Credible but not significant. Light near 1-BKR-68-341A does not have safety chain/wire, but associatedconduit/wire would prevent it from falling.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE No U-- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead conduit, piping, and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NWI UW1 N/AW--

Attached electricallines are made with flexible connections.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NWI UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Temporary scaffolding near cabinet appears to be adequately restrainedto prevent seismic interaction. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is clean and orderly. Rolling scaffolding in front of cabinet is tied-off appropriatelywith 2 chains and wheel stops are engaged. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Phillio York 9-28-2012 Page 136 of 451 

                                                                                         .status: Y[Z NEI UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-211-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEI UE- N/A[-]

All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UI- N/AE-oxidation?

No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE- N/AE Normal floor cracking. No significant cracking observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCG1 1846.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 137 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-21 1-B-B Equip. Class 3 3. Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 1-B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NO UE1 N/All All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NCI UEI N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI Nn UE1 N/AEI All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NCi UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained. Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE-- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Phillip York 9-28-2012 Page 138 of 451

St atus: YN N[-- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium VoltaQe Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-015 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NZl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U-] N/AE[

All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE- N/A[-

oxidation? No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE Normal floor cracking around the embed plates is present. Nothing significantobserved.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U[] N/A[]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWG 45N247-1 and Calculation WCG 11846.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 139 of 451

Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-A-A Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AZI All items appearto have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI U-I N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.All overhead electricalis rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UW- N/AZI All electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI- U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[W] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Observed scaffolding in the immediate area-wellrestrained.Also work-in-progress-cablesentering the back of the cabinet. Panels are bolted lower than normal. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 PhiiD York 9-28-2012 Page 140 of 451

St atus: YI N[:] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 2-BD-211-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A824, WBN-WB-038 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI Ur- N/A--

All panels/cabinetsopened to verify all (6) bolts per bay as well as panel to panel connections. All bolts present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI Ur-1 N/A[-

oxidation? No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NEI U[-1 N/AEl Normal floor cracking is present. No significant cracking observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NIZ UF- N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 45N247-2 and Calculation WCGI 1846.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 141 of 451

Equipment ID No. 2-BD-21 1-B-B Equip. Class 3 3, Medium Voltage Switch-gear Equipment Description 6.9KV Shutdown Board 2B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI Ur1 N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr-] Ur-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NW UE- N/AZI All electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

There is significant scaffolding in the area, but it appears to be well restrained. Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Also work-in-progress-cablesare inserted into the back of several cabinets with the cover panels bolted in a lower position. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Phillit York 9-28-2012 Page 142 of 451

Status: YE N[-] UI-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yr- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-] N/A[[

No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware. All hardwarepresent.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE Nl[ U-] N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces painted or galvanized. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ* NE-1 U[[] N/A[[]

No visible cracks. Y[[ NEI U[[ N/AZ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) YZ NEI U N]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 143 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer IA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-1 N/AZl The only soft targets are the connections and they have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/AL!

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Lights are safely chained. All conduit is rigidly supported.No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEl UI- N/AZ1 Flexible conduit is in place.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good. There is a lot of scaffolding in the room, but it all has good clearanceand well restrained. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 144 of 451

s t arts: YE ND- UEJ1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer 1B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A803, WBN-WB-039 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE- N/AZ All items are present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UE N/AZ oxidation?

All items are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed. Minor corrosion observed at the grounding connection.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE UE1 N/AZl No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE UE N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 145 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-237-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Instrument Power Transformer lB Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U[-i N/AZ Scaffolding is in close proximity to 4" connection. Scaffold is well restrainedand should not be a problem. (1" clearance)
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-E U[-- N/AZ Electrical connections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NE-I Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequaterestraint. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 146 of 451

S t a t us: YO NE] UZI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-O001 Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Samplingj Power XFMR Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A802, WBN-WB-003 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FederalPacific Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE-I UE- N/A[Z
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE-I N/AZ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE UE- N/AZ-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentalion? YEI NE-- UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[E UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 147 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DXF-242-0001 Equip. Class3 4. Transformers Equipment Description Rad Monitoring and Sampling Power XFMR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/AZ Nearby conduit rigidly connected.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead pipe and conduit rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] UE-1 N/AZ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YED NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? No adverse seismic conditions observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping, no temporary equipment nearby. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 148 of 451

str..o: YE NE] U0Z Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341A-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEi U-- N/A--

Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AF' oxidation?

All surfaces painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[-] UEI N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI U[] N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 149 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-OXF-068-034 A-A Equip. Class3 4. Transformers Equipment Description PZR Backup HTR GRP lA-A Transformer Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N[] UI- N/A[l
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UL- N/AZ 10.IBased on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 150 of 451

St.a.t: YE NEI U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 1D Transformer Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A902, WBN-WB-043 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[D NEI UE- N/AE Wide flange frame welded full-length to embed plates in floor.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE- N/AD oxidation?

All surfaces painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE3 N/AZ3
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U[E N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y* NO UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 151 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-068-0341F Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description PZR Control HTR GRP 10 Transformer Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NI- UI- N/ACl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOI Urn N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE- U- N/Al]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN Nr- uE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ul-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 152 of 451

S t at us: YZ NE- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-AO02-A Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A856, WBN-WB-018 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinghouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NlI UE] N/AZ All viewable hardware is in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NCI UEI N/A[-

oxidation? All surfaces are painted and in reasonablygood condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEI UE- N/A[l No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED NEI UEr N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 153 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-A002-A Equip. Class 3 4. Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown board Transformer 1A2-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-1 N/AEI-No objects in close proximity of soft targets.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present. Overhead lights have safety chains. All other items are rigidly supported or very robust structuralsteel.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NEI Ur- N/AZ Exposed conduits are flexible type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-] U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 154 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-OXF-212-BO02-B Equip. Class 3 4, Transformers Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A855, WBN-WB-019 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Westinqhouse Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEL Ui-1 N/AEl All anchorageis in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UIZ N/AEl oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion is present but is in good working condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y10 NFI UI- N/A[l No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEl U[] N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 48W1227-3 and 48W1227-4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y* NEl UFI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 155 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-OXF-212-B002-B Equip. Classo, B s Transformer1 Equipment Description 480V Shutdown Board Transformer 1B2-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[-] N/A[-]

Soft targets are free of any possible interaction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YID N--] Ur-] N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overheadlights have safety chains.All other overhead objects are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI Ur-n N/AI-Conduit connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE-n U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NC-- Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Upper railing of temporary scaffold No. 113600645 is held together with wire instead of pins. Top railingis not very stable, but not a seismic concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 156 of 451

St*a*.: YN NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) DeLaval Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE!] N/AE!

All bolting was present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[-! UE- N/AE3 oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE] N/AE!

Minor visible cracks. None > 0. 5mm.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE] N/A[!

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWGs 41N353-5, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 157 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-PMP-070-0051-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Pump C-S Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI U-- N/A--

The pump and motor are not soft targets. But all other components have adequate clearance to prevent spatial interaction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE" N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No block walls or ceiling tiles present. All lights are complete with safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI ULI N/AZ All piping is rigidly mounted and power connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[-] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Area is clean and all equipment is painted. Good housekeeping is being maintained. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 158 of 451

Status: Y] N-- Ur-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0009-B Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N-- UL- N/AZ No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted with minor chipping. No visible surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE-- N/AZ No visible cracking in concrete near anchors.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NZ UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 159 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-PMP-078-0 009-B Equip. Class3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UDJ N/AD-Temporary scaffolding present, but adequate clearance and appears to be properly restrained.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDI N/AD3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supportedand in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND: UD- N/ADI Electrical connections are flexible and attachedlines are properly supported.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIN NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDl Ur-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No observed adverse conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 160 of 451

S t atus: Y[ NEI U[ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to-document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NO UI- N/AO All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[Z- N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted and well maintained.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO UZ- N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NZ UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 48N1223-2 and 48N1223-8.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 161 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-PMP-078-0035-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Circ. Pump C-S Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ULI N/AEl Everything has adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE N[-] ULI N/AZ3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All items are rigidly mounted overhead.No masonry black walls are present. No ceiling tiles are present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI ULI N/AF' Piping is rigidly mounted and qualified. Conduit connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UEZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that.could YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding in the area is not secured properly per "TI-276" Scaffold 

      #27076 with only (1) horizontal restraint.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in the area is acceptable. Lots of scaffolding in place. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 162 of 451

Starus: Y[ NEI U[ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-OOO1A-S Equip. Class 3 5. HorizontalPumps Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump IA-S Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO UO N/A[

Anchorage is in place and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO UL] N/AF' oxidation?

Some minor corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI U[-1 N/AO No significant cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NO U[-1 N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 41N353-3, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 163 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-OOOIA-S Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump IA-S Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI ULi N/AE-All soft targets have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NWi U[] N/AW]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? All items overhead are adequately supported.No masonry walls present.No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety wired.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NWI UW- N/AW1 Electricalconnections are flexible type. Piping is flexible and rod/hung piping is analyzed ASME pipe.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NF-1 UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NWI UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonablein the area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 164 of 451

Srat.t: YN NEI UI-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-O128-B Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Aux FeedwaterPump 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UL N/AZ Everything was in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI ULI N/A-1 oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NF-Z Ur] N/Al]

There were cracks observed, but they were smaller than 0.5mm.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI Ul] N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 41N353-6, 48N1221-2, and 48N1221-6.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UF]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found.. Page 165 of 451

  • Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-003-0 128-B Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux FeedwaterPump 1B-B Interaction Effects
7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-I N/A--

The pumps and motor assembly are not soft targets. However, all other items in the area were acceptable.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI ULI N/AZ3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No block walls or ceiling tile were present. Lights have safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE! UEr N/AZ Main piping connections were rigid. Power connections were flexible conduit.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NE-I Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The area was well maintainedand painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 166 of 451

Status: YN NEI UL-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Centrifugal ChargingPump lA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] U-- N/AZ All bolts in place. No apparentproblems with bolting.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI] UEI N/AZ oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI] UE] N/A[[

No cracks were observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NI-] UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 41N353-4, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] UE7 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 167 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-062-0108-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Centrifugal Charging Pump lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI- N/AEI The pump and motor assembly is not a soft target. However, there were no potential threats in the area.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI- UI- N/AE[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Everything was well supported and the lights had safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-I N/A[--
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI- UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEl UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Area was very well maintained. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Everything was painted and clean. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 168 of 451

St a t .s: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-OO15-B Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NL-I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YE NEI UI" N/AZ All anchorageis present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U" N/A-'

oxidation? No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NEI UF- N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U-- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWGs 41N353-2, 48N1219-2, and 48N1219-4.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 169 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-063-0015-B Equip. Class 3 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump lB-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NE-- UI- N/Ar-The pump and motor assembly are not soft targets. No adverse conditions were observed.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-- N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All lights were safety cabled and all piping was well supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Ni-- Ut-- N/AZ Piping and conduit connections have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Area was very well maintained. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Everything was painted and clean. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 170 of 451

Status: YE NE- UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Johnston Pump Co. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE-1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NZI UZ- N/AZ-oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion, paint is degradedand chipped away

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NZI UZ-] N/AZ-1 No cracks observed
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG PCS434485-01

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 171 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0431 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen wash Pump 1A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEIl U'- N/AZ No potential interactions
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Ur- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls or lights overhead. No ceiling tiles. All overhead structures are anchoredin place.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NZI UZ- N/AZl Pipes are rigidly supported and electricalconnections are flexible
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEZ UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable-butcould be better Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 172 of 451

s t atus: YE NE U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-067-0440 Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump 1B-B Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1107, WBN-WB-012 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Johnston Pump Co. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZNIEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN NEI UI- N/AZ No bent, broken, or loose hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM NI" U-] N/AZ oxidation?

Free of corrosion-allpainted, good housekeeping

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE] Ul- N/AL!

No cracks observed

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG PCS434485-01

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No concerns 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 173 of 451

Equipment ID No. I-PMP-067-0440 Equip. Class 3 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Screen Wash Pump lB-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NDI UrD N/AD No potentialinteractions
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U-1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls or lights overhead.No ceiling tiles, all overhead structures are anchoredin place.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N--1 UD1 N/AZl Yes, all piping is rigidly mounted and all electricalhas flex connections
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YED NEI UDI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic concerns Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping-areaclean and painted. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 174 of 451

St .tus: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-070-0131-A Equip. Class 3 5, HorizontalPumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal BarrierBooster Pump 1A-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI NEI UEI N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken. Bolted through channel on pedestal.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI NEI UE- N/AI oxidation?

Painted with minor chipping, no observed corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NI] UI- N/AI No observed cracking or degradation.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI NI] U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 41N353-12, 41N353-16, and N757039 #1 (contract 8324301).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEIUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 175 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-070-0131-A Equip. Class 3 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description CCS Thermal Barrier Booster Pump lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U- N/AZI Adequate clearance aroundpedestal. Temporary flood barrierand scaffolding present with adequate clearanceand appears to be restrainedproperly.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI[ U1 N/At3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Conduit, piping, and duct rigidly supported and in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NZI UZ3 N/AZ Electrical connection is flexible and attached lines are supported with adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YED NEI UFI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI U[Z]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? No observed adverse seismic conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 176 of 451

St.tus: Y[ N[- UM] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A Equip. Class3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YED NEI U[-1 N/AZ-No missing, damaged, or loose.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[D NEI U--1 N/AZ oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO Nil U[-- N/AZ No visible cracks > 0. 5mm.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED NO UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y¥ NrZ Ur]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 177 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0028-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AZ Over head scaffolding close to level indicator,but scaffolding is adequatelyrestrained.Close proximity of electricalconduit and prelube throttle (0-THU-67-506A). Deemed credible, but not significant.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U[] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YER N[] U-- N/AZ All electrical connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[W adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping reasonable,area is dirty and wet as expected. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 178 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1105, WBN-WB-010 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI NEI UII N/AZ No missing, damaged, or loose.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U[] N/A-1 oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion where paint is chipped away.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE N[i UI- N/AEl (1) Minor crack between anchors. Not a significant seismic concern.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[E UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchorsequally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 179 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0036-A Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump C-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[D NEI UE- N/Al Piping in close proximity to motor enclosure, but vertical displacement is negligible.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UEI N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray rigidly and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-- Urn N/A[Z All electrical connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEl U-EJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Observed oil containerin area not restrainedadequately to resist tipping. See area walk-by WBN-WB-010. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping reasonable,area is dirty and wet as expected. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 180 of 451

Starus: YE NEI UEý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 1109, WBN-WB-009 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Sulzer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y NEI-1 ULJ N/A--

No missing, damaged, or loose.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UI- N/A--

oxidation? Anchorage is mostly painted with some paint chipping away with mild surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U-- N/A-1 No visible cracks > 0.5mm near anchorage.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U-' N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified there are (8) 1-1/2" anchors equally spaced on sole plate, per DWG 2E-2373.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 181 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-PMP-067-0047-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description ERCW Pump E-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U-1 N/A[]

No nearby equipment. Overhead scaffolding present and properly restrained.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEl UI- N/A[.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded. No masonry block walls.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UI- N/AZ All electricalconnections are flexible and piping is rigidly supported.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NFI UE-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NfE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Reasonably good housekeeping/maintained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 182 of 451

Status: YZ N[-] uED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI Ur] N/AZ Welded frame to embed plate, painted and in good working condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 NEI Ur- N/AZ--

oxidation? Paintedand clean.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE- N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NI U-- N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNZNlUZ--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 183 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-PMP-074-0020-B Equip. Class 3 6, Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump 18-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YER N[-] UZ-1 N/AZ Nearby chain hoist (credible but not significant). All other equipment and structures have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead conduit and piping rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI Ur- N/AZ Seismic piping supports in place to minimize load to nozzles.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 184 of 451

S t a t us: YE ND U[-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-FCV-032-0082-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow IsoL Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

Mounted in ASME piping.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UE]- N/AE]

oxidation? No corrosion identified. All surfaces were painted, galvanized, or stainless steel.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE] N/AN Inline mounted in ASME piping.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEi UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 185 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-FCV-032-0082-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Essent. Control Air TR A Norm Flow Isol. Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI Ur- N/AE-All items have adequate clearance. No objects overhead to be an issue.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI ULI- N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? None present-this is on the refueling floor.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI UE- N/Al]

All connections are flexible.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y19 NEI Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 186 of 451

St atus: YN NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS Charqing Header/RCPSeal In. Flow Cntl Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YO NEI UE] N/AE]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U-] N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE-1 NEI UE-1 N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE-1 NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 187 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0089 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS CharqingHeader/RCPSeal Ini. Flow Cntl Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI Ur- N/All Tubing to scaffolding clearanceis greaterthan 1". Is not a concern.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U'- N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[ UZ1 N/AZ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 188 of 451

Status: YE N[-] UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-062-0093 Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description CVCS Charging HeaderFlow/PZR Level Control Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A310, WBN-WB-033 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve, in-line mounted in ASME piping.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YE NEI U-- N/All Welded in-line in ASME piping, everything appears to be in place.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI U-- N/AE3 oxidation?

All items are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[-- Nil U-- N/A[D
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NEI UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UCI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 189 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-FCV-062-0093 Equip. Class3 7 Pneumatic-OneratedValves Equipment Description CVCS Changing Header Flow/PZR Level Control Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEIl U[- N/A[]

Observed clearance of Y4"- 1" between the AOD operatorand civil! structuralfeature.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[] N/Al]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? A non-reinforcedmasonry block wall is in the room, but is in good condition and properly restrained.Not in the area of the valve. All overheaditems are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED N[] UL- N/Al]

Tubing connections have good flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is scaffolding present in the room and it appearsto be well restrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in this area is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 190 of 451

Status: Y[ NE] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Safety Injection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YFt NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
  • Valve is in-line mounted in ASME piping.
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEl U[- N/A[

All components are in place and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEl UL-I N/A[:

oxidation? In-line mounted in ASME piping.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI- NOl U[1 N/AN
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEl U-I N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 191 of 451

Equipment ID No. f-FCV-063-0048-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description Safety Iniection Pump 1B-B Suction Isolation Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[E NEI UE- N/A[]

All soft targets are free of spatialinteractions.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI US N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Conduits,pipe, and duct are all rigidly mounted. No masonry walls in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[S N/AZI All conduit connections are flexible. Piping is rigidly supported ASME.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ur3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI US-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Scaffolding was present in the area, but was adequately restrained. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 192 of 451

Status: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0213-A Equip. Class3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler 1A ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space.below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE- NEI U-. N/A[

In-line piping component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UE- N/A0 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- N[E1 UE-1 N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ NE-1 UE1 N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? In-line component in ASME piping. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 193 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0213-A Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler IA ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NOI Ul- N/A[]

More than 2" clearance to all items.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present.All overheaditems are rigidly mounted. Scaffolding is in close proximity but well restrained.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEl U[-] N/AZI All tubing connections have adequate spans and changes in direction to provide adequate flexibility. All electricalconnections are flexible conduit.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N--1 U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Congested area-buthas required clearances. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 194 of 451

Status: YE* N[-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/TBBP Space Cooler 1B ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorawe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YO- NEI UE- N/AO Line mounted.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NEI U[:] N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NE1 UE- N/An
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[-1 U[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 195 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-067-0215-B Equip. Class 3 7, Pneumatic-OperatedValves Equipment Description SFP/IBBP Space Cooler lB ERCW Sup Flow CNTL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI- N/A[l Temporary scaffolding in the area with adequate clearance and appearsto be properly restrained.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI U0I- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead piping and conduit is rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE- N/AEl Tubing connections have adequate spans and bends to provide flexibility. Electricalconnections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Congested area with scaffolding. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 196 of 451

St arus: YE NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description SI Pump 1B-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UI N/AZ This MOV is inline mounted. All flange bolts were in place.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI] U- N/AO oxidation?

No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE1 N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NIl UI-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 197 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-063-O175-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description SI Pump lB-B Min Flow Recirc. to RWST Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE-- UI1 N/A[l There was adequate clearance between the valve and operator to prevent spatialinteractions.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur- N/Ar--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UEl N/AZl Conduit was a flexible connection.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ull of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NZI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The pipe that the valve is installedin is rigidly mounted. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) All surfaces were clean and painted. Good housekeeping was being maintained. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 198 of 451

S t .a.u: YZ NEI UIZ] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RHR Pump lB-B Suction Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI Ur] N/As Line mounted to piping, no additionalanchorageprovided for MOV. All hardware is present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NFI U-] N/Al]

oxidation? See Question 2.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YrI- NEI Ur] N/A2
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NEI Ur- N/AC9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI Ur]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Adequately mounted/supportedby piping. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 199 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FCV-074-0021-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RHR Pump 1B-B Suction Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UE- N/AEl
      .No nearby equipment, adequate clearance around MOV.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overheadpiping/conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nil U-1 N/AZl Attached lines are made with flexible connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIE NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZl UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 200 of 451

Status: Y] N[:] U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operated and Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B RefrigerantLine FSV Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area A924, WBN-WB-032 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used .to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline to ASME piping.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED Nil UE1 N/A[]

Inline to ASME piping.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE] N/A[]

oxidation? Mild surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE-I N[-1 UZ- N/AZ Inline to ASME piping.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U-- N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 201 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FSV-031-0447-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description 480V Bd Rm 1B RefriqerantLine FSV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UrI N/AZ No soft impact issues.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U0 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead duct and electricalare rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE1 N/AZI Conduit is flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very bad in this area. Very wet environment. Anchor bolts on associatedpipe support are corroded.Not a significant concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 202 of 451

Srarusý: YN NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0135-A Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A 307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE' N/AEl Line mounted in ASME piping.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N['I UE1 N/A[[]

oxidation? All surfaces are painted, galvanized, or stainless steel. No corrosion was observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NEI UE- N/As
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ N[E] UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Inline mounted in ASME piping. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 203 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0135-A Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Url N/AZl All soft targets are clear of spatial interactions.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEl U-- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead. All other items are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NZl U-- N/AZ All connections are flexible. Rigidly mounted in piping.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in the area is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 204 of 451

Status: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A307, WBN-WB-034 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline mounted in ASME piping.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE] UE] N/AE]

Line mounted in piping. All hardwareis in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

oxidation? Line mounted in ASME piping.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE-] N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 205 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-LCV-062-0136-B Equip. Class 3 8, Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves Equipment Description RWST CVCS Supply HDR Isolation Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE] U[I- N/AEl All soft targets have sufficient clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. No lights or ceiling tiles overhead.All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NEI U-] N/AE]

All connections are flexible. The valve is rigidly mounted in ASME piping.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in the area is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 206 of 451

Sta t us: YE NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan 1A-A Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) . Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE- N/AF--

Observed from floor of Accumulator 3. Supported by rigid structural steel frame that is bolted to the wall.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEi UL] N/A-1 oxidation?

All surfaces are painted an in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEI UE- N/AE-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE] N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEi UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 207 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0038-A Equip. Class-Equipment Description CNTMT Air Return Fan lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/AZ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[:] N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found' no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 208 of 451

Status: YE N[-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0447-A Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UII N/A[]

No loose, missing, or broken hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YNI NO U-- N/AEF oxidation?

No visible surface corrosion.Fan bolts are painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UI- N/AF-Some observed hairline cracking. No observed structuralcracks near anchorage > 0.5mm.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS Nfl U- N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 209 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-044 7-A Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG IA-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] U[] N/AL]

Adequate clearance aroundfan

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[] N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead conduit,pipe, and airduct rigidly supported and in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[9 N[E] U[] N/AE3 Attached lines are flexible conduit/wire.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N-] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] UM-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping. No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 210 of 451

Sr....: YN NEI Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0449-B Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Peerless Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NDl UD1 N/AD All hardwarepresent and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ ND1 UD- N/AD oxidation?

Hardware is all painted and free of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NiD UD1 N/AD1 Hair-line cracking near anchoragein grout - No cracks apparentin foundation.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDI UD- N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-3, 18N304, and 18N305.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? In good working condition 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 211 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0449-B Equip. Class3 9, Fans Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust Fan 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-I N/ACl All adjacent equipment is adequately anchored and supported.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U- N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safety cable restrained.No other fall concerns.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NEI UEr N/AZI Duct has expansion joint for isolation and there are flexible conduit connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment is clear for the intended service. All components are present and in good working condition. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 212 of 451

Sta t us: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-FAN-030-0459-A Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen lA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D203, WBN-WB-020 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PORTER Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEl UW- N/AZl oxidation?

No visible surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEl U- N/AZl No observed structuralcracks near anchorage >0 .5mm
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U-- N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-3 and 18N305.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N--1 UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 213 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-FAN-030-0459-A Equip. Class 3 9, Fans Equipment Description Diesel Gen IA-A Elect Board Room Exhaust Fan Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[D NE] UEI N/A[

Adequate clearance aroundfan

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UI- N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead conduit, pipe, and air duct rigidly supported and in good condition. Masonry wall present and in good condition..

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NE] UE1 N/AE]

Electrical connection made with flexible conduit/wire.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping. No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 214 of 451

Status: YZ ND] U[] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C401, WBN-WB-046 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YC9 NE UF- N/AEl All hardware is in place and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-- N/AZl oxidation?

Moderate surface corrosion was observed on the anchorbolts.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE Nil Uil N/AZl No significant cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ Nil U-- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 48N1305.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UEZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 215 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0012-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Main Control Room AHU A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ULI N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NEI U[:] N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead. All items overheadare rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NI] Ul-] N/Al]

All piping and tubing have adequate changes in direction.All electrical connections are cable or flex type conduit. Some pipe also has flex hose connections.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[:] U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Observed electrical connection that appearsto be cable, not conduit. After further review was determined to be flex conduit as required. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonablein this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 216 of 451

St .a.u: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-AHU-031-0045 Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A809, WBN-WB-041 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-I N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UI- N/A[

All anchoragepresent and painted. Good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI- U-- N/AZ-oxidation?

All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U-l N/Ar-
        .No significantcracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ- NEI Ur-Z N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE-I Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 217 of 451

Equipment ID No. o-AHU-031-0045 Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Air Handling Unit A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NCI ULI N/A-I Electrical connection is clearof all possible impact items. Expansion joint at duct connection has good clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y19 NE] Ur- N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained. All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UEr N/AZ Electrical connections are flexible conduit type. Piping is rigidly supported with changes in direction.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y E NE Ur-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good in the area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 218 of 451

Status: YZ N[-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-AHU-031-0461-A Equip. Class 3 10, Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU IA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A857, WBN-WB-047 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NE] UE] N/AE]

All items are in place-no bent broken missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE-] UE] N/AE]

oxidation? The anchor bolts have significant corrosion.After further review and comparison with other examples of corrosion, this was deemed to be only moderate corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE] U-] N/AE]

No significant cracks observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE] UE] N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEl UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 219 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-AHU-031-046 1-A Equip. Class 3 10. Air Handlers Equipment Description 480V BD Room IA Supply AHU lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NOI UL- N/A[

Cable tray supports in the area are close-the frame has been notched to allow for a 1/4" clearance. All other items are good.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI- U-I N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry black walls, no ceiling tiles or lights overhead.All items overheadare rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO U- N/AZ All piping has flexible connections. Electrical connections are flex type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonablein this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 220 of 451

sta tus: YEl NO ULý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A Equip. Class3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEr N/AZ Covered with insulation, but intact and no visible maintenance.

Insulation was removed to verify anchorage.All anchorage was present.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yr- NO Ur] N/AE1 oxidation?

Significant corrosion was observed following removal of insulation around base.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI Ur] N/AL!

No visible cracks.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE! UE] N/AE!

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-] NO UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 221 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0036/2-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UL- N/AE Covered by structuralsteel frame and sheet metal. Pipe penetrating sheet metal. Potentialfor impact, but not significant.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI U-- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported. No block walls in vicinity

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NJ-] U-- N/A[l Electrical connections are flexible and attachedpiping is rigidly supported with flexible connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI N-U1u of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Moderately wet environment. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 222 of 451

St at us: YEI NO UM! Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) YORK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YS NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchor points are covered with insulation. Will return with AUO to remove insulation.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE- N/AZ1 All hardware is present and not loose, bent, or broken. (Observed after removal of insulation)
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE-1 NO UE-1 N/AZl oxidation?

The south and north pedestals have significant corrosion. The south base plate has bubbled. Bolts on south side of pedestal have significant corrosion as well.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE- N/AZ Observed spider web type cracking mainly in the paint. No significant cracks (greaterthan 0. 5 mm).
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UEF N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 41N353-13 and 366-79594 (Sht. 1-3).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NO UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 223 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0049/2-B Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UD- N/AZ Adequate clearance is provided to all soft targets.All overhead items are rigidly mounted.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UZI N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. No ceiling tiles. All systems overhead are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UZI N/A[Z Tubing is guided when leaving skid, but has change in direction to allow for flexibility. All electricalconnections are flexible type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEZ U[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is not bad-but there is significant condensation under the insulation leading to the corrosion. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 224 of 451

St.aus: YZ NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0080-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YZ NEI UE] N/AE No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion and chipped paint.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEl UE- N/AE No visible cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE] N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 225 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-03 1-0080-A Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description Main Control Room Chiller A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE--] UI N/AZ Covered with structuralsteel frame and sheet metal.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEIr UEJ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NZ-1 U[-- N/AZ-Electrical and piping have flexible connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UF-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Temporary scaffolding in area, but appears to be adequately restrained/supported. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Protectedequipment stanchions left in area. Should be removed. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 226 of 451

Status: YE NEI U[-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0128 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerA-A Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space-is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE! N/AO No missing, loose, or damaged. Insulation was removed for inspection.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NE! UI- N/A[-]

oxidation? No observed corrosion.Insulation was removed for inspection.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[[ N/AZ No significant cracking observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE! NE! U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 227 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0128 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE1 N/An Evetything is rigidly supported and/orhas sufficient clearance. Note small bore connection at the end of the chiller does not have a guide.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI UE N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Equipment is protected by a permanenthood. All items in the area are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-1 UE- N/A--

One large 4" conduit passes through the permanent hood. After review of WB-DC-20-32, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good in the area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 228 of 451

Status: YE NE- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHR-031-0129 Equip. Class 3 11, Chillers Equipment Description ElectricalBoard Room ChillerB-B Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area Cl10, WBN-WB-037 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PCX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YED NEI U[-J N/AZ Insulation was not on this Unit. All items present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO Nil U-- N/AE' oxidation?

Surfaces are greasy and dirty-no corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UZ-1 N/AZ No cracking observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ- N["Z UZ- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 229 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-CHR-031-0129 Equip. Class 3 11. Chillers Equipment Description Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI UI1 N/A[:]

Small bore connection at the end of the chillerdoes not appear to have adequate protection/guide.Needs further review.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UL-I N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Equipment is protected by a permanenthood.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-1 N/AZl Potentialadverse condition-(2) 2" pipes penetrate the permanent hood. One of them continues on to 1" screwed connections. A 4" conduit penetratingthe permanent hood-has a guide and continues on with flexible type conduit. Not an adverse seismic condition (after review of WB-DC-20-32).
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS N--1 U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 230 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI U[] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air CompressorB Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Ingersoll-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UZ- N/A[-]

No observed bent, broken or missing hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UEZ N/AZ oxidation?

All hardware painted with minor chipping.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U-] N/AZ-No observed cracking.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI U] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG L-9257.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 231 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-COMP-032-0026 Equip. Class 3 12. Air Compressors Equipment Description Station Air Compressor B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[:] UE- N/AZ Adequate clearance maintained aroundequipment. Portable exhaust fan located nearcompressor, wheels are locked to avoid rolling.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All cable tray is rigidly supported.Piping is rod hung and in good condition. No masonry block walls in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE1 N/AZl Electrical line has flexible connection. Attached piping is rod hung and properly supported.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) No staged or housekeeping items in the area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 232 of 451

St a t us: Y[ NiJ UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux Control Air CompressorA-A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN NO UEI N/AZ No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEr- UE- N/AZ oxidation?

All hardware is painted. No observed corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yt NEI UEI- N/AZl No visible cracks in concrete. Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appearto be structuralcracking.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UEl N/AZ-1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Bolts appearedto be incorrect size per DWG 13220-D-1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 233 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0060 Equip. Class3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux ControlAir CompressorA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ Adequate clearance around compressor.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI] U-- N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NZ UZJ N/AZ Piping has adequate support with flex connections. Electrical connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YC9 NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NZI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping practice. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 234 of 451

S t atus: YE NE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-COMP-032-0086 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description Aux ControlAir CompressorB-B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Inciersol-Rand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEi UE- N/AZl No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AZl oxidation?

Paintedand in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NO UZ- N/A--

No visible cracks in concrete. Minor cracking in paint on grout. Does not appearto be structuralcracking.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U[-1 N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Bolts appeared to be incorrectsize per DWG 13220-D-1K (contract 821044). Verified per DWGs 41N353-8 and 41N353-18 (the as-built bolt size was qualified by Calculation WCG-1-1853).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 235 of 451

Equipment ID No. o-COMP-032-0086 EuC Air Equip. ClasS3 1 Air Compressors Compressors 12, Equipment Description Aux Control Air Compressor B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI UL-I N/AZ Adequate clearancearound compressor. Temporary scaffolding in area and appearsto be adequately restrained.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U0 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead building steel and crane in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-- N/AZ Piping has adequate support with flex connections. Electrical connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No observed adverse conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping items observed, see area walk-by WBN-WB-026. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 236 of 451

Status: YE ND U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Quincy Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U-] N/AZI
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?

No rust/corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE Nil UZ-1 N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U-- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UZ]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All items in good working condition painted and free of defects. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 237 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0180 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG IA-A Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ULI N/AEl Observed plastic posts and chain for protection of nearby batteries.

Determined to not be a significant risk.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-1 N/A[3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lights have safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UDI N/AEl Flex hose included for air dischargepipe.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI N[l U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is properly supported and anchored with no proximity interaction risks of significance.

  • Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 238 of 451

Status: YE N[- U[ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0210 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor I Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEZ N/A[

All hardwareis in place and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U-] N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UI] N/AZ-No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U-] N/A[-Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-2, 18N302, and 18N303.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 239 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-COMP-082-0210 Equip. Class 3 12, Air Compressors Equipment Description DG 1B-B Air Start Compressor 1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] ULI N/AEl All piping is rigidly mounted. Nothing in close proximity. Plastic barricadein the area, but not a significant issue.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Url N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. No overhead lights or tiles. All items above are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI NEI UE- N/AZI Pipe has a flex hose and conduit is flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI U--1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) No housekeeping issues, very clean area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-201.2 Page 240 of 451

St atus: YN NEJ UE] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-A Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN NEI' U- N/A[:

Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UI- N/AZ oxidation?

Welds are painted and in good condition. No visible deterioration.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO UI- N/AZ Minor cracking observed around embed plate. Does not appearto be adverse seismic condition.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YU NO U-' N/AOl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UCZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 241 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-A Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UEZ N/AEl Adequate clearancearound equipment
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil] U-I N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded. Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025). Safety chains/wire on all lights.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UL- N/AZ Electricalconnections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. (2) light bulbs overhead are out. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 242 of 451

Status: YN NEI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set 1B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area A901, WBN-WB-025 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Electric Machinery Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[_

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN NO U[1 N/AD3 Wide flange frame welded to embed plate. Weld is full-length both sides and across embed plate.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UD- N/ADl oxidation?

Welds are painted and in good condition. No visible deterioration

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NDI UDI N/AD Minor cracking observed aroundembed plate. Does not appearto be adverse seismic condition.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U[] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 45N226-2 and 48W1228-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 243 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-085-B Equip. Class 3 13, Motor Generators Equipment Description Control Rod Drive M-G Set lB Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-I N/Al Adequate clearance around equipment.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray, piping, and conduit properly supported and in good condition. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded. Overhead hoist frame present and in good condition (see WBN-WB-025). Safety chains/wire on all lights.

9. Do -attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UE N/A[E]

Electricalconnections are flexible.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO UE[[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 244 of 451

Status: YZ NI:] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel I Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEr NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YE N[-] UE] N/A[l Welded to embed plate in floor; appearsto be free of damage (observed on outside of cabinet). Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified as well as the panel-to-panel connections. Front panels required extensive disassembly to open.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UI- N/A[-

oxidation? No visible corrosion.All surfaces painted and in good condition

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UI] N/A[]

No visible cracks in concrete.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N[3 UE] N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 245 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-BD-236-0001/1-D Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N-] U-I N/AE-Scaffolding in close proximity to panel on west end (-3/4" clearance).

After further review, the clearance was deemed satisfactory.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE-] UI-1 N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition. No masonry block walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE-1 UE- N/AZ-Flexible electricalconnections at top of panel/cabinet.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN N[-] UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Light burnt out in south-east corner and center of room. Scaffolding in close proximity to emergency light battery. Could impact seat angle/support, but not significant seismic impact. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Phillib York 9-28-2012 Page 246 of 451

S t atus: YEI NO UIIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003 Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description DistributionBD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-- NIE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AZ All hardware appearsto be in place and in good condition (observed from inside cabinet/panel). Cabinet base is bolted to channel that is welded to embed plate.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N[-1 U[D N/A[-Z oxidation?

All items are painted. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI U[-1 N/AZ No significantcracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI U-] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 247 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-DBD-238-0003 Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description DistributionBD PNL 3 120V AC Preferred Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE- NO U[- N/AEF Observed printerand drawing table in the aisle way adjacent to the equipment that is not properly restrained.Could potentially impact breakerswitches on front of panel.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEi ULI N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. Ceiling tiles and lights are properly restrained.All other items are well restrained.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NE) U-1 N/AE-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 248 of 451

Status: YE N-- U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-OOO1-D Equip. Class3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I DistributionPanel 0 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YO NEI Uil N/AZ No loose, missing, or damaged.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN Nil U-- N/A[Z oxidation?

Clean and painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NiZ UZ-1 N/AZl Wall mounted, no visible cracks in concrete or damage.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ-1 NEI UZ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nil UE--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 249 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-DPL-236-O001-D Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Board I DistributionPanel 0 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE] UL- N/AE]

Scaffolding pick boardin close proximity to flex connection on top of panel (-2'), credible but not significant.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported and in good condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI Ur] N/AZ Flexible electricalconnections on top of cabinet.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Door is missing bolts but appears to be closed securely. Missing bolts are for shipping and transport;they are not requiredfor operation. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good.. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Phillipo York 9-28-2012 Page 250 of 451

St atus: YE NEI U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board 1/11 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y19 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YZ NEI U-1 N/AL]

Mounted to a steel frame. Box is bolted to the frame and the bolts are in good condition. Frame is welded to embed, welds in good condition as well.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-] N/AE3 oxidation?

All surfaces painted or galvanized. No corrosionpresent.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UI- N/AL]

Steel frame is welded to embed and no cracks are visible.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U[-] N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? All is in very good condition with good housekeeping observed. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 251 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-68DC2-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches s//l 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Battery Board Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD' N/AZ No nearby equipment. Hood in place overhead.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] Ur-] N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls. Cable tray is rigidly supported. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported as well.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[-] UD- N/AD Yes, conduits are flexible type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI- Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 252 of 451

Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U-] N/AZ All hardware appearsto be in place and in new condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U-] N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO UI] N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YJE NEI U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DCA 53437-400 and Calculation WCG-ACQ-0443.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? Rigid frame welded to embeds in the floor. Cabinetis bolted to the frame. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 253 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-XSW-236-79DC1-S Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 125V DC TransferSwitch Select Charqers 7S/9S Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI Ur- N/A[:]

Has a protective hood over it and no other items are in close proximity.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEIr UZ N/AL]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? No masonry walls present. All items above are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI NEI Ur] N/AEl Two conduit connections are hard tube conduit. After further considerationand review with FRC, deemed to not be an adverse seismic condition.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-1 U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI Ur--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Wood form work correctly in place for new cabling. Work in-progress. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Some housekeeping issues relatedto in progress work. Nothing of significance. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 254 of 451

S t atus: YE NE!] U[I] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-235-O001-D Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-1 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A804, WBN-WB-016 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Wallkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN N- UL- N/AO Welded to embed plate in floor; appears to be free of damage (observedon outside of cabinet). Back panels were opened and anchorage to structure was verified. The power boards exist in one continuous cabinet and no panel-to-panel anchoragewas observed.

Front panels requiredextensive disassembly to open.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE1 N/ACl oxidation?

No visible corrosion.All surfaces painted and in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UL- N/AZ No visible cracks in concrete.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UL- N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NO- U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 255 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 14, DistributionPanels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Instrument Power Board 1-I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] UE- N/AZ Scaffolding pole near conduit/flex connection on top of cabinet. After further consideration,deemed not to be a significantspatial interaction.

However, it does not meet the requirementsof MMTP- 102.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U-I N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE] U'-Z N/AZl Flexible electrical connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YER NZ-] U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions 11 . Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 256 of 451

Status: Y NEi ULM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BD-278-MO07B Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YO N[-O U-] N/AEl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UrI N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NOI U-] N/AH (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 257 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BD-278-MOO7B Equip. Class 3 14, Distribution Panels and Transfer Switches Equipment Description 120V AC Instrument Power Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NIh U[I N/AU
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UI- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NUl UU1 N/AU-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NUI UI-U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Page 258 of 451

St atus: YN NEI UF-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0001-D Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-027 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk.down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UEI N/AI-The anchorageis in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI NEI UE- N/A--

oxidation? All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE- N/AZ-No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE1 NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 259 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-BA T-236-OO01-D Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-I N/ArI All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U- N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UZ N/AZI All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YER NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The room is clear of temporary equipment. Wood scaffolding is present but adequatelyrestrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 260 of 451

Status: YE NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0002-E Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery II Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-028 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[1 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UD- N/AD--

The anchorageis in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-- N/AD1 oxidation?

All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ ND-] UE- N/AD-No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDI NDI UD- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 261 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0002-E Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery // interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UZ- N/AZI All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NR UI-] N/AZ]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NZI UZ1 N/AZI All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO U[:

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R NZI UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? The room is clear of temporary equipment. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 262 of 451

S t atus: YE NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-BA T-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A854, WBN-WB-029 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y. = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the ilem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] UEr N/A[Z The anchorage is in very good condition. No bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[! NEI UE- N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE] UZ] N/AZ No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/A[K (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI- Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 263 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-BAT-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Ill Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NCI UE- N/A[

All items have adequate clearance.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NO- UI- N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safety cabled and there are no ceiling tiles. All overhead items are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NOI Ur- N/AZ All cables have additionallength to allow for flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI UE" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO-] UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? The room is clear of temporary equipment. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent. (2) light fixtures contain burnt out light bulbs. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 264 of 451

Status: Yt NEIl Ul-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery 1A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q104, WBN-WB-001 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEi UE" N/A[Z All hardware in good condition, appears to be set properly and tight.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE U[L] N/AEZ oxidation?

No visible corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE] N/A]

No visible cracking (majority of concrete covered by rack base plate).

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI NEI U-'

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.. Page 265 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI U[[ N/A[[

Closest equipment is panel mounted on wall (greaterthan 1" clearance)

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE] UL-] N/A[Z and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Hood/structure mounted above rack.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NEI UE] N/A[Z Flexible battery connections.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalgood housekeeping Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 266 of 451

St atus: YE NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-BAT-215-B-B Equip. Class 3 15, Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel GeneratorBattery 1B-B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YlI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UE] N/AE' No loose, missing, or broken hardware. Could not touch equipment-trip hazard-nothinglooked loose.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI U[] N/AE]

oxidation? There is mild surface corrosion, not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

Some observed hairline cracking at south grounding lug connection. No observed structuralcracks near anchorage > 0. 5mm

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI U0- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 267 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-BA T-2 15-B-B Equip. Class 3 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V Diesel Generator BatterV lB-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI UE-1 N/Al[

Plastic barricadepoles observed in the area-butnot significant.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UrI N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Batteries and the rack are protected by an overhead plate steel ventilation hood. No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NEI UL- N/AL All cabling has loops allowing flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NLE UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEl UL--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping, no concerns. All components in the area are rigidly mounted. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 268 of 451

St .a..: YE NEI U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-OOO1-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger! Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NLI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N-] UE-" N/A[

Everything is in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEI N/AE3 oxidation?

All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ Nil UEI N/AE-No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UZ- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DCA 53437-427 and 53437-428.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Very good housekeeping conditions. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 269 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery ChargerI Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE1 N/AZ Scaffolding horizontalpole in close proximity with flexible conduit on south face of charger.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UEr N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Covered by a structuralsteel frame and hood.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE- N/AZ Flex conduit is utilized.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other.Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UZ-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 270 of 451

St a tus: YE NEI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery CharQersand Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery ChargerIll Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk:down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UE- N/AZ All anchorageappears to be in place and in new condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UZ-' N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are clean and painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U-' N/An No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ Nil UZ- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DCAs 53437-427 and 53437-428.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y ! NEI U[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 271 of 451

Equipment ID No. O-CHGR-236-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description 125V Vital Battery Charger IIl Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI UE- N/A-1 Nothing in proximity of soft areas of equipment. No proximity interactions expected.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Nil ULi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights are safely chained. Area heaterabove equipment is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS Nil UI[] N/A[l Connections are flex conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEl UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

None observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good. Light directly over the equipment is burnt out. Another fixture 10' north of the equipment is burnt out as well. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 272 of 451

St atus: YE] NZ UE] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-O001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqers and Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter0-1 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'? YN NEI Ur- N/A[l No missing, damaged, or loose (like new condition).
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEIl UI N/AZ-oxidation?

All surfaces painted or galvanized.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UZ] N/AZ No visible cracks in concrete.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[L] NE Ur- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Bolt spacing on front of inverterdoes not meet the tolerance requirement indicated on DCA 51370-517.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 273 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-INV-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Instrument Inverter 0-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y(9 NEI U-I N/AI-Covered by structuralsteel and sheet metal. Adequate clearance aroundequipment all around.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI N--] UI-] N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? HVAC and cable tray rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NEI UF1 N/AEl Electrical connections rigidly mounted near floor.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI N[-] UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? No adverse seismic conditions observed. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good and orderly. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 274 of 451

Strarus: YN NE!1 UE] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-CHGR-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Batter,Charger Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN-WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AE3 All hardware/anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing, or loose hardware.

3.. Is the anchorage. free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI NEI UE- N/All oxidation? All surface are painted or galvanized. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UEr N/Ar-No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE' NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 275 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-CHGR-215-A-A Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description DG IA-A Battery Charger Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y10 NEI UI- N/AZ The only soft targets are the electricalconnections and switches on the front panel. All have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UZ- N/AlZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All items above are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEi U[: N/AZl Electricalconnections are flexible conduit type.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UEi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good in this area. Plastic barricadeis present but not a significantissue. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 276 of 451

St a tus: YE NEI UIII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0001-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-I Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AZ No missing or damaged parts.All surfaces are painted or galvanized.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UL] N/A--

oxidation? No corrosion. Excellent housekeeping.All surface painted or galvanized.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE- N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UZ3 N/AZ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DCAs 51370-114 and 51370-135.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions observed. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 277 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-OO01-D Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC vital Inverter 1-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U-1 N/AE]

Covered by a hood. No items are close enough for spatial interactions.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls. Lights have safety chains. All items above are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-] N/Al]

Electricalconnection utilizes flex conduit.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[] UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding in the immediate area, but properlyrestrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Very good housekeeping, no adverse conditions observed. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 278 of 451

Status: YN N[-] U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-// Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A852, WBN-WB-014 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UI- N/AEl All items present and in new condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED N[l ULi N/Al1 oxidation?

No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI Uil N/A[l Normal floor cracking is present. Nothing significant observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI ULi N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DCA 51370-214.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NO UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 279 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0002-E Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120VAC Vital Inverter 1-/l Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UL- N/AZ All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-I N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block wall present. No ceiling tiles. All lights are safety chained.All other items are rigidly supported. Smoke detector with missing cable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UEr N/AE]

Connections are low at anchoragepoint. No differential motion expected.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? There is scaffolding nearby, but has adequate restraint. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 280 of 451

Status: YO] NM UL! Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Charqersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-1l Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area A864, WBN-WB-017 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) AMETEK Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[:]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-] N/A[l All hardware is in new condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U-] N/AEj oxidation?

All surfaces are painted or galvanized. No corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NI U[-] N/AE3 No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-- NO U-] N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchor spacing shown on DCA 51370-314 does not match as-built condition.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ Nr] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The cabinet is welded to angles that are anchorbolted to the floor. All are in new condition. 3Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 281 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-INV-235-0003-F Equip. Class 3 16, Battery Chargersand Inverters Equipment Description 120V AC Vital Inverter 1-Ill Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] U[-] N/AZ No equipment or structure within close proximity.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1 NEI UE- N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls. Lights are safety cabled. HVAC is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UZ- N/AZ-Yes, conduit is flex type and other connections are low at the floor where the movement would be the same.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UZi.

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding in the generalarea, however it is adequately restrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 282 of 451

S t atus: YN ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A 1-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1A I Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U[1- N/AZ Clean/paintedin very good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UL] N/AEl oxidation?

Clean and painted, no observable rust.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE N/AZl No observable cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NO! UE- N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

There were no observed adverse seismic conditions. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 283 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A1-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine IA I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN Ni Ur N/A[--

There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UD N/AL!

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NEI Ur- N/A All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEIU[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted. Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO- ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained. Good housekeeping practices have been implemented. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 284 of 451

Status: YZ NEI U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1A2 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO- ULI N/AOl Clean/paintedin very good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U-] N/AL!

oxidation? Clean and painted, no observable rust.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE3 U['- N/AL!

No observable cracks.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE! N/AZl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

There were no observed adverse seismic conditions. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 285 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-A2-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1A2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE-1 UI1 N/AZ There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[l UF-1 N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[-] UEI N/AZ All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted. Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained.Good housekeeping practices have been implemented. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 286 of 451

Status: YN NEI UR-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B1-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine IBI Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UL- N/AL!

All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI U[] N/AE]

oxidation? All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YC9 NEI UF'] N/AE]

No observed cracks.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UFI N/AL1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 287 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B1-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1BI Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE-J Ut- N/AZ All items are adequate and or rigidly supported: There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present.All lights are equipped with safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NZI UZ1 N/AZl All connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI U[--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping observed, very clean area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 288 of 451

St8 t..: YN NM~ U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-DIEG-082-B2-B Equip. Class3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel GeneratorEngine 1B2 Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[i of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UI- N/AEl All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U[] N/A[l oxidation?

All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UI- N/AEl No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NE-- UZJ N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 289 of 451

Equipment ID No. i-DIEG-082-B2-B Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine 1B2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI UI- N/A[l All items are adequate and or rigidly supported. There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UUI N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UUl N/AUl All connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UEU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping observed, very clean area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 290 of 451

Status: YE N[-] U-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIA-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator1A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D104, WBN WB-O01 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GM/Porter(Electric ProductDivision) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NIl Ur] N/Ar-Clean/paintedin very good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U[I] N/AL-oxidation?

Clean and painted, no observable rust.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE Ni-] U-I N/AZ No observable cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NZI UZ- N/AZ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? There were no observed adverse seismic conditions. 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 291 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOO1A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator lA-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U-] N/AEl There are no nearby items for seismic interaction.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UD] N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Piping is rigidly mounted, lights have safety cables, no masonry block walls, and duct is rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U'- N/AL]

All conduit, exhaust, air intake, and piping have flex joints for isolation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[l UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No items are close enough for impact, and all adjacent items are rigidly mounted. Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Equipment is in very good condition and well maintained. Good housekeeping practiceshave been implemented. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012 Page 292 of 451

Status: YZ N - UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator1B-B Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area D106, WBN-WB-021 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI Ui- N/AEl All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NIl U-- N/A[Z oxidation?

All surfaces are painted. There is no visible corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN N[] UI- N/A[

No observed cracks.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI U-- N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI Ur]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 293 of 451

Equipment ID No. 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 1B-B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UE- N/A[

All items are adequate and or rigidly supported. There is sufficient clearance between all soft targets and items in close proximity.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NEI UI- N/AZI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls present. All lights are equipped with safety cables. Temperature sensor overhead is not safety cabled as noted in area walk-by (WBN-WB-021).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE-] UE- N/Al]

All connections are flexible.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NE] UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping observed, very clean area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 294 of 451

St .a.u: Y[ NR U[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2A-A Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q105, WBN-WB-022 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ParsonsPeebles Electric Product Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U[] N/A[Z]

All anchorageis present and painted. Nothing damaged.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UL- N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[[] U"I N/AU No observed cracks.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U-'

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 295 of 451

Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2A-A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEl U-1 N/AEl All items have adequate clearance for proximity interactions.All items are rigidly mounted.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ur1 N/AZl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse .onto the equipment?

Temperature sensor at north end of the A2 engine does not have a safety cable. Everything else is rigidly supported, no masonry walls, lights have cables.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nil Ui- N/AZl All pipe and conduit connections are flexible
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NEI Ur1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[r]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good. Scaffolding installed over the south end of the A l engine. No spatial interactionsobserved. Observed 2" clearance to fuel pipe, not a concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 296 of 451 

                                                                                             &:.t..: YI Ni[ Ul-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Equip. Class 3 17, Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator2B-B Location: Bldg. OG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area Q107, WBN-WB-023 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) The Electric Products Division Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk-down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO Nil UE- N/AE]

All anchorageis present and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/Al]

oxidation? All surfaces are painted. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE] UEI N/Al]

No observed cracks.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NWI UW- N/AW (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 10N320-1 and 18N302.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 297 of 451

Equipment ID No. 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Equip. Class 3 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator 2B-B interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE-] U-1 N/A[Z Relief valve on south-west accumulatoris within 5/8" of rigid pipe support. Tank axial stop will allow 3/8" travel in that direction. After further review, clearance deemed to be adequate.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UE- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry walls, light fixture directly over generatoris missing (broken) a safety cable. This is not significant.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NDl U-1 N/AZl All pipe and conduit connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is very good. Light with missing safety chain. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 298 of 451

s t atus: YN NEI UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: 1-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure) Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area I110, WBN-WB-011 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO N[E UE- N/AZ1 Anchorage is free of broken, missing, and loose.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?

Bolts are painted and no corrosion was present. Mounting plates have some minor surface corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI U[-] N/A[Z No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Page 299 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-L-14 7/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: I-P1-067-0434 (Traveling Screen Inlet Pressure) Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI Ur- N/AZ See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-01 1. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UD N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadsmoke detector does not appearto have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UI- N/AZ All conduit has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 300 of 451

Equipment ID No. 0-L-147/C Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack That Contains: I-P1-067-0434 (TravelinQ Screen Inlet Pressure) Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE UW N/A[-

See comments from area walk-by WBN-WB-0 11. Stored scaffolding in immediate area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U[-1 N/AW and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead smoke detector does not appearto have a safety chain. All conduits are well supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE U[ N/AW All conduit has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[ UE[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] N[: UW adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 72-01 7-24-2012

Status: Y[ N-' U-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-L-155 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains: 0-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoranie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEi UE] N/Ar1 No missing or loose hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] Ni: UE N/Ar-oxidation?

No corrosion, bolts are painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE Nr-1 U[-- N/AE1 No visible cracking.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEf NEI UE- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-L-155 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Instrument Rack that Contains: O-PI-70-49 and 0-PT-70-222C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UD N/A[]

Adequate clearance between rack and rigid pipe support. See question 11.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead piping and conduit rigidly supported and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y-- NDI UDI N/AD Connections'topanel/rack are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is a temporary lifting device restrainedwith rope to an adjacent pipe support. The plannedremoval date has expired. Device is adequately restrainedto prevent interaction, but it is not restrained properly per TI-276. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012

Status: YZ\ NFD UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R127-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE N/AE Visible anchorage is free bent, missing or loose hardware. Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjoining racks at the top inside of the cabinets.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI U-I N/AE oxidation?

Welds and bolting is painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE- N/AE No visible cracks surroundingembed plates.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE: UE[ N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y- NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment IDe No. 1-PNLt-275-R27-A Equip. Class 3 18. instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U[] N/AE Racks are bolted together.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEi N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported. Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y- NEI UE- N/AE Attached conduit is flexibly attached.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[:

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[- Nn U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding is properly supported and secured. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 81-01 8-13-2012

S tats: :YE]N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area C201, WBN-WB-048 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEr U[-1 N/AE Rack is welded to embed plates at bottom and bolted to adjacent racks on outside at the top of the cabinets. No visible anchorage deficiencies.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UE1 N/AE oxidation?

Welds and bolting is painted with no signs of oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE1 N/AE No visible cracks surroundingembed plates.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE3 NE UE N/A[E (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-275-R143-A Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Train A BOP Instrument Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y- ND-1 UE- N/All Racks are bolted together.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO- U-J N/AEL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable trays, conduit, and piping all rigidly supported. Nearby lighting has proper tie-offs and properly attached.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[- NEI Urn N/AEl Conduit connections are flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI Urn-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding is properly supported and secured. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012

s t a t us: YE NFý U7I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-PNL-278-M7 Equip. Class 3 18, Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7) Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-] N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ Nr-1 Ur] N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UW1 N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEr- NW- U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment IDJ No. .1-PNL-278-M7 Equip. Class3 18. Instrument Racks Equipment Description Transfer, PFD PWR, and Instrument Power Racks (1-M-7) Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ N- UE N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE' NO UE N/AE
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 71-01 7-19-2012

Status: Y[Z NM U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-TS-030-0192B-A Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/ITBBP Space CoolerA-A Temp Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) NOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NE U[-] N/AZ No bent, broken, missing, or loose parts.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE1 N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted or stainless steel. No corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UDJ N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NE Uil N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NEI U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-TS-030-0192B-A Equip. Class 3 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SFP Pump/TBBP Space Cooler A-A Temp Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UE- N/A[-

Scaffolding in the area, but it is clear of proximity interactionand well restrained.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/A[-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? No masonry block walls present.All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE- N/AUI Conduit connection is flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012

Status: YZM' ND UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TS-O01-0017A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump Room Temp Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A306, WBN-WB-042 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE7 NE U[-E N/AE[

All painted and in good condition. Wall mounted.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO- NE] U[:] N/A[

oxidation? All painted, no corrosionobserved.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI UE- N/A]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TS-001-0017A-A Equip. ClaSS3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description TD Aux FeedwaterPump Room Temp Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO] NEI UD- N/AD-All items and connections are rigidly mounted and have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND] UD- N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All items overhead are rigidly mounted. No masonry walls present.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NDI UD- N/AD-1 All items are rigidly mounted.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012

SNtatuss YZN 1DU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-O179-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump 1B-B Room Cooler Temp Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A312, WBN-WB-007 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AE Anchored to concrete wall with finger clamp. All hardware is in good working condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE: UE] N/AE oxidation?

No corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE] U- N/AD1 No visible cracks near anchorage.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ NE] U[E] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0179-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description SIS Pump lB-B Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U[] N/A[

No nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overheadpiping rigidly supported and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NWI UE- N/AZ Rigidly mounted to wall.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NF- UrZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NWI UW-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012

s t a t usY- Ni UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. ChargingPump IA-A Room Cooler Temp Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area A309, WBN-WB-006 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U[L] N/AEl All anchorage is in place and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YlM NEI UE- N/AE]

oxidation? All items are painted and in good condition. No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[[] UD] N/AE1 No significant cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-0183-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Cent. Charging Puma IA-A Room Cooler Temp Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y1Z NEI UL- N/AEl All items have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U-1 N/AD' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No masonry block walls present. No ceiling tiles. Lights are safety chained. All other items overhead are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y"I NEI U[:] N/AD Every piece is rigidly mounted to the wall.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO ND-1 U[:]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NEI UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012

St.t..: YE N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B Equip. Class3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG lB-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area D209, WBN-WB-002 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PENN Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE] N/A[

Finger strap in good condition and in place.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE] N/AE-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE UE- N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-453A-B Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensor Equipment Description DG 1B-B Room Exhaust High Temperature Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y- NEI Ur N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZD NI UrI N/A]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Mounted on a reinforcedblock wall.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NO UZ N/AZ All components are supported from the same wall.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NZ UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012

S t a t us: YZ ND- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pumo Room B High Temperature Switch Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area A210, WBN-WB-004 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE:] N/AE Rigidly mounted to unistrut bolted to concrete wall, no loose or missing hardware.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UEr N/AEl oxidation?

No rust or corrosion, painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE N/AE No visible cracking or deterioration.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE-- UE N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TS-030-5237A-A Equip. Class 3 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Pump Room B High Temperature Switch Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE U[D N/ADI Cabinet/box mounted overheadis bolted to concrete wall.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Conduit rigidly mounted and in good working condition.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD1 N/AD Attached line is flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-- ND- U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDI UD-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping in area and clean. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012

St atus::YNEUD Y[- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012 Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitoring MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZD ND UD N/AD Welded to floor at the base.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y-" ND] UD N/AD oxidation?

Welds are painted.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YD N[D] UD N/AN Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD- NDI UD N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[1 U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-M012 Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description Radiation Monitorinq MCR PNL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE7 NZ UD- N/AE1 South face of east end was missing 2 bolts and south face of west end had I bolt missing and 1 bolt was shearedoff. Condition needs to be further evaluated.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[E] UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling is supportedadequately and overhead emergency lighting is tied off.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NEI UE- N/AEI Connections to the cabinet are through the floor.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NE UE[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZJ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012

Status: YD NE U] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO26A-A Equip. Class3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE-] UE] N/AE Welded to floor at the base of the cabinet. All welds are in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE N/A[

Concrete was not observable due to carpet.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NE UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEl UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26A-A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description DG IA-A MCR PNL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI- NED UI- N/A[]

The south face of the cabinet on the west end had 2 missing bolts. This could potentially be an adverse seismic condition as it could affect the cabinet functionality. Condition needs to be further evaluated.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI Ur- N/Al]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Suspended ceiling is supported adequatelyand overhead emergency lighting is tied-off

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE: UE1 N/A[

Connections to the cabinet are through floor.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE[ NZ UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN] NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Some of the ceiling tile clips were missing 1 or 2 bolts. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012

Status: Y-- NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No.. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE N[E UE[ N/AE Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?

Painted welds.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE[ NEI UE N/AO Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE[ N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO26D-B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DG 2B-B MCR PNL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NO UE- N/AEI South face on west end of cabinet is missing 2 bolts. Furtherevaluation required.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE UE3 N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling is adequately supportedand emergency lighting is tied-off

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO- NE-1 UE] N/AE-Connections to cabinet are through floor.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Several of the ceiling clips were missing I or 2 bolts. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012

Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NE-1 U[-1 N/AE]

Welded at base of cabinet, welds are in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN- NEI UE] N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[] NEI UE] N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE-1 NEi UE] N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NEI U[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27A Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description ERCW MCR PNL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI N[-E U-- N/AE Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent panel/cabinet.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U11 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling is supportedadequately and emergency lighting is tied-off.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[9 NEI UE1 N/A[E Connections to cabinet through floor.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEN NE-- UE-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012

S t.atu: Y[Z ND-] UD-- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. O-PNL-278-MO27B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area C412, WBN-WB-005 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[D NE UL-1 N/AZ Welded at base of cabinet, welds in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[O N[l U[- N/AEZ oxidation?

Painted welds and free of rust.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- N[ U[:1 N/AZ Concrete was not observable due to carpet.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NE-1 U- N/Af-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y- NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-PNL-278-MO27B Equip. Class 3 20, Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description CCS MCR PNL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UE3 N/AO Adequate clearance around cabinet and securely fastened to adjacent cabinet.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling supported adequately and emergency lighting tied-off.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI ND UD N/AD Connections to cabinet through floor.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UrD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012

Status: Y[q NI- UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] U-] N/AO No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[D NE] UE] N/AE]

oxidation? Mild surface corrosion nearcracks/chips in paint. All hardware is painted and in fair condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE] UE] N/AE]

No visible cracks in concrete.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE] UE] N/A[J (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[: UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-070-0186 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YLN NEI UE] N/AE]

All connecting hardware is rigidly supported. Valves have adequate clearance.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE- UE:] N/AE Attached lines are rigidly supported.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UE[Z of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012

St.: YZ[7ND-1UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat ExchangerA Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE N[ U-] N/AZ All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO* NEI UEZ N/AZ oxidation?

All surfaces are painted.No corrosion observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/AZ No cracks observed.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UF] N/A[Z (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0031 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YlN NE UE N/AE Only soft target is a drain pipe and valve. Adequately protected.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] U[] N/A[E]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? No masonry walls present.All overhead items are rigidly mounted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEN N[:] UEI N/AE-All piping connections are rigidly mounted.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE1 U[7 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE-1 UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffolding is present in the area, but well restrained. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is good in this area. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012

St a.u,.: YE] ND-- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area WBN-WB-024 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] N7 U-] N/AD All anchorage is in place with no broken, bent, or loose parts.Appears that south east anchor bolts are missing lock nuts. Double nut configuration is not indicatedon the drawing.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UD N/AD oxidation?

All hardware is painted. No visible corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO ND-1 UD] N/AD No cracks observed >0.5mm
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NDI UD1 N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWGs 5598 and 5599 (contract 5411401).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 0-HTX-078-0032 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD1 N/AD No nearby equipment. Temporary scaffolding is present with adequate clearance and appears to be properly supported.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nr- UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead,piping and conduit is rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD1 N/AD All piping connected is analyzed and rigidly mounted.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N[D] U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE ND: UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Good housekeeping, no observed adverse seismic conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Temperature sensoraround HTX has the safety chain disconnected (not credible). Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberrv Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012

S *a*.: t Y[ NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat ExchangerA Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area A2-Q/A13-U, WBN-WB-013 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE1 N/A[

No loose, missing, or broken.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE] UE- N/AEl oxidation?

Mild surface corrosionnear cracks/chips in paint. All hardware is paintedand in fair condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/AE No visible cracks in concrete nearanchorage.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEr NEI U[E- N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UE--

potentially adverse seismic conditions? No potentialadverse seismic conditions noted for the anchorage. I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-HTX-070-0185 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Heat Exchanger A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YlZ NEI U[] N/AEl All connecting hardware is rigidly supported. Valves have adequate clearance.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Cable tray is rigidly supported and not overloaded.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE] NEI UW1 N/AW Attached lines are rigidly supported
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[: UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[W]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Scaffolding near east end of heat exchanger (-1" clearance). Scaffolding appears to be rigidly supported/restrainedby structuralsteel framing. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon7-521 7-25-2012

Status: YN N[-] UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-063-0046 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area Yard, WBN-WB-044 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE- N/AEl All items present and in good condition.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AEl oxidation?

Tank is S. S. and in good condition. Anchor bolts are painted with some minor corrosion present.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE UE7 N/AE]

The well surroundingthe tank had standing water. Direct inspection was not possible. Looking through the water the concrete appeared to be in very good condition.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions? 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-063-0046 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Refueling Water Storage Tank Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U-1 N/A-I Outdoorinstallation. All items on the tank perimeter were protectedby a rain hood.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-l ND UE N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Outside.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NE UE- N/AEl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NF- UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[N NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in this area is reasonable. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon8-021 8-10-2012

St ~t~s: YZ NDIUD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Pressurizer Relief Tank Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI U-- N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEN NDI U[- N/AD oxidation?

All surfaces painted and in good condition, minor chipping present.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y- N[D UD N/ADl
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NDI U N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified per DWG 48N949.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[*ND1UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-068-PRT Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description PressurizerRelief Tank Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UF- N/AL]

No exposed soft targets. Tank is covered by structuralsteel platform.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U-- N/AL]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[E NE] UL] N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NL] UL]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Substantial work in-progressduring refueling outage. Temporary scaffolding and shielding in immediate area. No areas of concern. Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012

Status: YO N[D U[-] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-O001 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area A813, WBN-WB-026 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Nil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE- N/AEl No loose, missing, or broken.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?

Painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE- N/A[]

No observed structuralcracking.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UE' N/AE[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verified per DWGs ISI-0496-C-01 and N-1-2504.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Equipment ID No. 1-TANK-070-0001 Equip. Class 3 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCS Surge Tank A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI NEI U- N/A-(2) soft targets, but well protected.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U--1 N/A[:-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead conduit rigidly supported. Lights have safety chain/wire.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UW N/AO Piping rigidly mounted and tubing is flexible.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NR UW--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? No observed adverse conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. No temporary equipment. Overheadscaffolding appears to be supported adequately (-30' above floor level). Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012

Appendix F: AWCs The following signatures are provided for the engineers responsible for the Area Walk-By Checklists in Watts Bar Unit 1. Name Signature Date Travis Hockenberry I-/'3I/j2 to Mike Gordon t.W I/ . Phillip York /0301/2? Page 345 of 451

Status: YE] NN U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-O01 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and fmdings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE] NE UD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Shear lug on north-west air receiver is resting inside support saddle.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NDI UD- N/AED degraded conditions?

See question 1.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NDI UD- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All cable tray, duct, and conduit are rigidly supported. Cable trays are not over loaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ ND UD- N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All equipment rigidly supported. Lights have cable to prevent them from falling. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located Is .very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D104, WBN-WB-001

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y- NEI UE1 N/AE interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No spray hazard. C02 system implemented.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE UE1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Observed lube oil pipe support clamp not properly seated. Not a significantseismic concern.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE- N/A[1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO* NE Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Observed bent finger clamp on crosstie pipe to receivers. Found loose pipe support hardware on start-up air line 1082-586-2-2-3. Loose double nuts not carrying load. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room was very clean and good housekeeping is being practiced. Observed missing bolts in 1-PNL-82-ANI "DieselEngine Control Panel". Temporary eye wash station tied off using rope, not per TI-276. Observed missing anchor on pipe support nearsouth end of room (tag not legible). Calculationsfor similarsupports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BA T-215-A-A 1-CHGR-215-A-A 1-COMP-082-0180 1-DIEG-082-A I 1-DIEG-082-A2 1-GEN-082-00IA-A 1- TANK-082-0 160-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012

Status: Y[-- N7 U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN ND UD N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NE] UD- N/AD1 degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[Z NDI UD] N/A[D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Good clearances on all items in the rooms. No concerns. 4 If the roo. in -hich the SWEL ite m is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the are. selected should be d ... ribed. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D209, WBN-WB-002

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI Ur- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flood potential in the room. No sprinklers present.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UD1 N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustible products and no ignition source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nr- Ur1 N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No housekeeping issues or temporary equipment.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI UD:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Everything is rigidly supported. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FAN-030-0449-B 1-TS-030-0453A-B Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV Date: 7-17-2012 Mike Gordon 7-17-2012

Status: YZ N-- U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UD] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y- NEI UD- N/AD degraded conditions?

No corrosion or rust. All welded anchoragepainted with no signs of damage.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NDI UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC and cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NDI UD N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All overhead items rigidly supported with adequate clearance. 4 If the room 1,. hich the SWEL itemt is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaIl). the are. selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL it. t.

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO ND] UD1 N/A-l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y-- ND3 UDI N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fuel source or combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y-- NDI UD- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame. Temporary scaffolding secured properly. Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YlN NDI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495). The following equipment is included in the areaencompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-AOOI-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-003

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YID NEI UI- N/AlU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All sprinkler heads in area have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS N[l UED N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fuel source or combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary storage cabinet tied off with cable to rigid cable tray frame. Temporary scaffolding secured properly. Rolling scaffolding/buck not secured/tied off in two places, as indicated when not in use (wheel stop is engaged).

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UF-l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Concern with clearance to security feature (Raise question with security contact, Ext. 8495). The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-AOO1-A 1-DXF-242-0001 1-MCC-214-AOO1-A 1-MCC-214-AO02-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 351 of 451

Status: Y[E NEI UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YS NEI UiZ N/A-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NEI UL-1 N/AZ]

degraded conditions? Minor/mild surface rust on pump room cooler,but not significant.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U-1 N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduit rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NEI Ur] N/AEl, interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All equipment appears to have adequate clearance and supported appropriatelyto minimize interaction. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hail). the .. e.. elected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Ite. Page 352 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 676 Room, Area 4 A210, WBN-WB-004

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UF] N/AZI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerheads in the room.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE] N/Ar-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No fuel source or combustibles in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UE- N/AEZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No portable/temporaryequipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-074-0021-B 1-PMCL-030-0176-B 1-PMP-074-0020-B 1-TS-030-5237A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-18-2012 Mike Gordon 7-18-2012 Page 353 of 451

Status: YE NE-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE[[ UE[ N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All visible anchorageis clean and painted.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/A[

degraded conditions? No corrosion visible. All surfaces are clean and painted.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit. YEI NEI UE] N/AN raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

No cable/conduit raceways or HVAC duct were present or visible.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEl U[-E N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All cabinets, book shelves, lights, and smoke detectors are anchored or cable restrained. 4 If the coo. In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on juda ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 354 of 451

Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C412, WBN-WB-005

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEI NEI UEr N/AN interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No water sources were present.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEr N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Combustible items were present (carpet,paper,cardboard)but all electricalconnections were contained in industrialgrade cabinets that would contain sparks or flash.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No portable equipment was present. Some notebooks were in shelves with no restraintsbut were not a significantrisk.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Some missing bolts were observed in the restraintplates holding the ceiling tiles. In all but one case it was I out of 4 bolts missing. In one plate there were 2 bolts out of 4 missing. Maintenance was called to correct the problem immediately. Returned to the area at a laterdate and confirmed the issue was resolved. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-DBD-238-0003 O-PNL-278-MO12 O-PNL-278-MO26A-A O-PNL-278-MO26D-B O-PNL-278-MO27A O-PNL-278-MO27B 1-BD-278-MOO7B 1-PNL-278-M7 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-19-2012 Mike Gordon 7-19-2012 Page 355 of 451

Status: YN N[-- Uf-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ N[l U[] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Room cooler anchorage in good working condition with no loose or missing parts.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UFI N/AZ degraded conditions?

No corrosion or cracking visible.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[-Z N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Overhead conduit adequately supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UZ] N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance aroundall equipment. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based onjudgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 356 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A309, WBN-WB-006

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UO N/A[

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and piping is properly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-- N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Lube oil piping is adequately supported and in good working condition.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UZ- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding is present and adequately supported/restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NZI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-062-0089 1-PMP-062-0108-A 1-TS-030-0183-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 357 of 451

Status: Y[ NE] U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note- Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE N[] UI- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorageappears to be correct and complete.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI U[] N/A[-]

degraded conditions? No degraded conditions were observed. Good housekeeping was being conducted.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO N[W UW- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NEI U[] N/A[]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Most pipe, duct, cable tray and equipment is rigidly supported. No significant spatialinteractionsare expected. 4 If the room In wh ch the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., TurbIne Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 358 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A312, WBN-WB-007

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI UD- N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The fire protectionpiping is rod hung, but the sprinklers all have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD- N/AD-1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Lube oil was present, but the piping was designedwith adequate flexibility and support. It is also a welded system.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UDI N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Good housekeeping is performed. No temporary equipment was observed.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND-] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The area was clean and painted. Most all items in the room were rigidly mounted. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-063-0048-B 1-FCV-063-0175-B 1-PMP-063-0015-B 1-TS-030-0179-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 359 of 451

Status: YN NE! U[ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area 4 A1-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U1 N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No loose, bent, or broken hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NO- U- N/AZ degraded conditions?

All equipment anchoragepainted and in good condition. No visible cracking in concrete.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NEI U- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All HVAC, conduit, and cable tray rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI U- N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearancesbetween piping systems and support steel and equipment. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the .re.. elected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 360 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 713 Room, Area 4 AI-T/A5-R, WBN-WB-008

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI Ur- N/AEi interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance and are properly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI U"I N/ALl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NErI U1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary lifting device restrained with rope near instrument rack (0-L-155). Adequately restrained,but not per TI-276. Lifting device should be removed.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Nr-- Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-L-155 O-PMP-070-0051-S 1-PMP-003-0128-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-23-2012 Mike Gordon 7-23-2012 Page 361 of 451

Status: YE N-- U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE1 N/AZl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No loose, missing, or broken.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI Uil N/AZl degraded conditions?

Paint chipped away with mild surface rust.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NWI UZ' N/AZ1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable/conduitproperly supported with flexible connections on/off of tray.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE] N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance around all equipment. 4 If the room In which the SWEL ite rm is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judg ment. e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 362 of 451

Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1109, WBN-WB-009

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NE U-1 N/A[]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Water pipe resting againstmotor enclosure; credible but not significant spatialinteraction.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[] UI- N/AE]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? Containerwith combustible materialin area and restrainedwith chain.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YID NEI U-- N/AL3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Two trash cans in area, credible but not significant and one laddernot restrainedresting on the floor. One trash can in front of the fire extinguisher.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N:] UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is reasonable, area is dirty and wet (asexpected). Temporary rolling scaffolding with wheel stops engaged, but tied-off in 2 spots with rope, not per TI-276. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-PMP-067-0047-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 363 of 451

Status: YE] No U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NI] UI] N/AL potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No, loose, missing, or broken anchorage.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UI- N/AL degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion where paint has chipped away.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NI U-l N/AL-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray and conduit rigidly supportedand in good working condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YI] NO UL N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Temporary scaffolding near O-PMP-67-32 not adequately restrainedto prevent seismic interactionwith pump motor. 4 Ir the roo. in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the are. e..ted 

                                                                                                          ..       should   be d .... ibed.

This selected area. should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 364 of 451

Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1105, WBN-WB-010

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UEZ N/AZl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All piping adequately supported, no sprinklerheads in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UI- N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Oil containernot restrainedproperly to prevent tipping (nearO-PMP 36).

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UE- N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary cabinet not restrainedto prevent tipping. Rain hood not properlyrestrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Observed light fixture (PS504A) with safety cover not restrainedwith safety tie-off Credible but not significant. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-PMP-067-0028-A O-PMP-067-0036-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 365 of 451

Status: Y[ No U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area 4 /110, WBN-WB-01 1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI ULI N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All area equipment is in good working orderwith mild surface corrosion.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U[-] N/AZ degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED N[-] UZ N/AZ-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All conduit and it is rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y[ NW-1 UWl N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Monorails on temporaryscaffolding appearto be only friction held. They could fall off and strike the equipment below. 4 It the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected ares should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item. Page 366 of 451

Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 722 Room, Area 4 II10, WBN-WB-011

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED Nil U[I: N/AZ-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerheads in the area. All pipe is properly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[D NEI UE N/AZ-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Overhead lube oil line, but it is adequately supported.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE- N/A-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Lube oil bottle on electricalpanel. Scaffolding and barricadestorage area-piecesnot restrained.Barrels not restrainedin area of SSEL Instrument Rack. Credible but not significant.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[r]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Smoke detector missing safety cable-not connected. Could fall on an instrument rack. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping issues. Light bulb burnt out in the South end of the room. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Are Walk-By: 0-L-147/C 1-S TN-067-0009-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 367 of 451

Status: YE N-- U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 /107, WBN-WB-012 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U-] N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No missing parts observed.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?

Some chipped and missing paint, minor surface corrosion,but acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NZI UZ- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit only and it is rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UEZ N/AZ--

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? All items have plenty of clearance. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 368 of 451

Location: Bldg. IPS Floor El. 741 Room, Area 4 1107, WBN-WB-012

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur] N/AL]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? All piping is rigidly mounted. No sprinkler heads present.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ur] N/A-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? No lube oil lines present.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI NEI Ur] N/Ar]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Temporary security equipment is not adequately secured. Heat trace connections are not restrainedon all screen wash pumps.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NZ Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 

      -Safety lights not properly positioned or directed
      -Hand hole cover in HPFPSump A sump cover is not on or bolted
      -Bolts missing in HPFP Sump B sump cover The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:

1-PMP-067-0431 1-PMP-067-0440 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-24-2012 Mike Gordon 7-24-2012 Page 369 of 451

Status: Y[ Nn- U[ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A2-Q 1A 13-U, WBN-WB-013 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI ULI N/AEI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

The equipment in the area appears to be free of loose, missing, or broken anchorage.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant YO NEi Ufl N/AE]

degraded conditions? No significant degradation.Only minor surface corrosion as noted in heat exchanger and chillerwalk-downs.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI ULi N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded. HVAC ducting is rigidly supported and in good working condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI ULi N/AE' interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No significant spatialinteractionwith equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Hoist not parked in properzone due to scaffolding. In close proximity to fire protection pipe strut. Could potentially damage strut and/orpipe. Deemed credible but not significant. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected ares. hould be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL i.tm. Page 370 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A2-Q/A 13-U, WBN-WB-013

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI UE- N/AE) interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles in area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U['] N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder, fall hardness and mop bucket stored behind XFMR Coil. Bottle cart not tied-off

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

See general comments. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • Loose rods under temporary storage box, should be restrainedor stored somewhere else.
  • Radcon cabinet not visually bolted or restrained,but appears to be permanently restrained(did not move when pushed).
  • Loose table with instrument on it. (Not in proximity of anything that would be damaged if it fell).
  • Scaffolding resting on pipe to support ladder (notproperly supported).
  • Laddertied off but resting on conduit near A2-R.
  • Stored unistrut and tools nearA2-Q.
  • Cable tray covers on floor near A6-R (appearsto be work-in-progress,but no work-in-progress tag).
  • Ladder tied-off with rope to conduit. A12-S.

The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0036/2-A O-CHR-031-0080-A 0-HTX-070-0186 1-HTX-070-0185 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 371 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO N[ U-] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorage free of loose, missing and damaged hardware (like new condition).

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YED NE] U- N/AL]

degraded conditions? No signs of corrosion or cracking in concrete. All surfaces painted or galvanized.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI U-- N/AZ:

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? HVAC, cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance around all equipment. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected erea should be base 

                               .. on judgment,     e.g.. on the order    of about 35 feet   from the  SWEL   it em.

Page 372 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A852, WBN-WB-014

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI U[] N/AL]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Fire protection piping is rigidly supported and sprinkler heads have adequateclearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-] N/AE1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles observed in area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE-] N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.Housekeeping clean and orderly.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? No observed adverse seismic conditions Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHGR-236-0001-D O-INV-235-OOO1-D O-XSW-236-68DC2-S 1-INV-235-0001-D 1-INV-235-0002-E 1-MCC-232-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-25-2012 Mike Gordon 7-25-2012 Page 373 of 451

Status: Y[ NE] U[-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.' Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UEZ N/AE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All visible anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE N[-] UE] N/A[]

degraded conditions? No visible signs of rust/corrosionor damage.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE] UE] N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Cable tray rigidly supported and not overloaded. Conduit and piping is rigidly supported as well.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NE] UE] N/AEr interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No observed spatialinteractions. 4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is .. ry large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area s. lected'should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 374 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A802, WBN-WB-015

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AE!

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Sprinkler heads in area, but have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO! UE- N/AE-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[] N/AE!

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Appendix R work in progress and tagged/stagedappropriately. Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U[--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Good housekeeping observed. Everything in area is rigidly mounted. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-21 1-A-A 1-BD-212-AO02-A 2-BD-21 1-A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 375 of 451

Status: Y[ No U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UI- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All visible anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UI] N/AEl degraded conditions?

All visible anchorageis painted and free of corrosion.No observed concrete cracking or damage.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NEIl UI- N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Cable tray, conduit, and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEIl UI] N/AE1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. Temporary scaffolding within a X" of top of XFMR (WBN-1-DXF-237-A), potential for seismic spatial interaction. Upon return for walk-down of transformerthe scaffolding pole in question was moved to provided properclearance. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item. Page 376 of 451

LocatiOn: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A804, WBN-WB-016

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads present,,but appearto have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U['- N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No .combustiblesobserved.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI UE1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Good housekeeping practice. Temporary scaffolding present and appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BD-236-0001/1-D O-DPL-236-O0O1-D 1-BD-235-0001-D I-DXF-237-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 377 of 451

Status: YN NO UF-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[] N/A[Z]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Good Housekeeping-everything is painted and clean. All objects are well restrained.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UZ- N/AZ degraded conditions?

All welds and bolts are clean and painted.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UZ N/AZ[

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All cable tray and ducts are rigidly mounted on robust steel.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI U[-Z N/AZ3 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All items appearto have more than adequate clearance. 4 If the .roo In which the SWEL ite - i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected shou ld be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 378 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-017

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur-- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All items in the area are rigidly mounted. Sprinklers in the area are rigidly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U' N/AZI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustible material Older cabling is coated with Fire retardant.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Some temporary scaffolding is present, but well installed.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Several light fixtures need bulbs in the area. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHGR-236-0003-F O-XSW-236- 79DC 1-S 1-INV-235-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 379 of 451

Status: YZ NE[] UF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All anchorageis in good condition. No loose, missing, or broken.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NO] UF- N/AE]

degraded conditions? No significantcorrosion observed. No observed cracking in concrete near anchorage.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NEI UE] N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? All conduit and cable tray rigidly mounted.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UE] N/AE]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Adequate clearanceprovided around all equipment. Suspended lighting has appropriatesafety wire. 4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 380 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A856, WBN-WB-018

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UrI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads present, but have adequate clearances.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEI U-] N/A[-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? Combustibles storedin portable fire cabinet. Oil reservoirs have adequate clearance.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary fire cabinet not restrainedto prevent tipping, but adequate clearance to avoid interaction. Other temporary equipment and storage with work-in-progresstags.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-OXF-212-A002-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 381 of 451

Status: Y[ N[-- U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND U[-] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorageis in good condition. All items are rigidly mounted on steel. Some conduits are rod hung but have adequate clearance.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NDI UD" N/AD1 degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosionpresent, no impact.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NDI UD- N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Rigidly mounted on structuraltube steel.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NDI UD] N/ADl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This 6elected area should be based onJudgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 382 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A855, WBN-WB-019

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NE] ULI N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS N]-1 U[] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Oil reservoirs are clear of all objects. No expected spatial interactions.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UrI N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is significant scaffolding in the area but it appears to be well restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-OXF-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-26-2012 Mike Gordon 7-26-2012 Page 383 of 451

Status: Y[ NE] U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[-1 N/AZl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchoragein good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI U-- N/AZl degraded conditions?

Anchorage is painted with only accumulated dust. No corrosion obvious.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y! NEI U-- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All are rigidly supported and acceptablefill capacities. HVAC is rigidly supported as well.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI U--1 N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Possible issue with overhung duct work connected to fan (1-FAN 455). Originaldesign calculationand drawings confirm the configuration. 4 If the rootm in. hih the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected ares should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item. Page 384 of 451

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D203, WBN-WB-020

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE] N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerspresent. Fire protectionpiping is rigidly mounted.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustible source observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UL- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

None in the area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) TS- 13-128A is missing a safety cable. Reinforced masonry wall in the area and is in good condition. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FAN-030-0447-A 1-FAN-030-0459-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 385 of 451

Status: YE Nr-- U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D106, WBN-WB-021 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U--1 N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage (equipment).

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI U-- N/AZl degraded conditions?

All equipment anchoragepainted and in good condition with exception of air receiver tanks. Observed mild surface corrosion on bottom hardware of receiver strap. (Not significant)

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NZI UZ" N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray, conduit, and ducting rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NZJ UZ] N/AZJ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearancemaintainedaround equipment. Overheadlighting has safety chain/wire. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be des cri bed. This selected area should be based on judgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 fet from the SWEL item. Page 386 of 451

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 Q106, WBN-WB-021

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UI N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No fire protection sprinkler heads. C02 system in place, adequately supported and in good condition.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Lube oil and fuel lines rigidly mounted on skids. Flexible connection utilized between engine and generatorskid/frame. Overhead lines rigidly supportedas well.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NOn UI- N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No observed temporary equipment or scaffolding.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[-] ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is reasonable. Observed safety chain/restraintnot attached to sensors 0-TS-13-119B, 119A, and 2 TS on north side of room (unable to read UNID/tag). Observed I missing anchorbolt on pipe support 17A586-1-69 (south end of room). Calculation 17A58601069 for the support confirms the as-built configuration. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BA T-215-B-B 1-COMP-082-0210 1-DIEG-082-BI 1-DIEG-082-B2 1-GEN-082-OOOIB-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 387 of 451

Status: YZ NE] U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO N[] UI] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No loose, missing, or broken anchorageobserved on equipment.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UF- N/A[

degraded conditions? All hardware is painted or galvanized and in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NI] UI]'I N/AE3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions(e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] UI] N/A-I interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance aroundequipment. See general comment about temperature sensor. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g.. TurbIne Hail), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 femet from the SWEL item. Page 388 of 451

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D105, WBN-WB-022

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerheads present. C02 fire protectionsystem in place.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[D] U[-- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Lube oil! fuel line rigidly mounted to skid with flex connection between DG and Engine.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YID NEI UD- N/AD]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Temporary scaffolding in place and appearsto be adequately supported. 8; Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) TS- 13-120E and 120B missing safety chain/wire. TS- 13-120E could potentially impact panel/instrumentof 2-PNL-82-A/1. (1 additionalnoted in walk-down of DG 2A-A). Observed missing anchor on pipe support near south end of room (tag not legible). Calculationsfor similarsupports 17A586-1-69 and 17A586-1-92 confirm the as-built configuration. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 2-GEN-082-0002A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 389 of 451

Status: YO N[- ur-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 D107, WBN-WB-023 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[-I N/A[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? No loose, missing, or broken anchorage observed on equipment.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE N[-] UE'- N/AZ degraded conditions?

All anchoragepainted or galvanized. Some mild surface oxidation near bottom of air receiver tanks.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit* YN NEI U[E- N/AZ1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray, conduit, and HVAC/air duct rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM N[: UZ-I N/A[Z interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance around equipment. Observed loose double nuts on trapeze support on north end of room. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area. hould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 390 of 451

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 742 Room, Area 4 Q107, WBN-WB-023

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UI-- N/AE3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerheads present. C02 F.P. system in place.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U0I N/ALZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Lube oil/fuel line rigidly supported and utilizes flex connections.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE-1 U[-D N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Rolling scaffolding on north side of room; it appearsto be restrained properly.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Observed (2) temperature sensors on south end and (3) on east end all missing safety chains. Light on south end of room is burnt out. One missing bolt on pipe support 17A586-1-92. Calculation 17A58601092 for support confirms as-built configuration. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 2-GEN-082-0002B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 7-31-2012 Mike Gordon 7-31-2012 Page 391 of 451

Status: Y[ N[-- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED NEI UE] N/Al!

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All anchorageis free of loose, missing, or broken.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEIl U-] N/AE]

degraded conditions? No observed degradationor corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[] N/AL!

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Cable tray, conduit and piping are rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearoverloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE] N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearancesaround equipment. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area. elected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 392 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 WBN-WB-024

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinklerheads have appropriateclearance and support.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UI- N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed fuel source/combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YC9 NDI UD- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed housekeeping/portableequipment issues noted in general comments. Comments do not adversely affect equipment in area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UD-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • Job box not restrained(nearCCS boosterpump 2A and B)
  • Rolling cart not restrained
  • 50 gallon drums with loose chain around base
  • Some bulbs burnt out in the area The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By:

0-HTX-078-0031 0-HTX-078-0032 O-PMP-078-0009-B O-PMP-078-0035-S 0-TS-030-0192B-A 1-FCV-067-0213-A 1-FCV-067-0215-B 1-PMP-070-0131-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-1-2012 Mike Gordon 8-1-2012 Page 393 of 451

Status: Y[I N[] U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[[ N/AE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed anchorbolts on several pipe supports are not true-one was bent but still should function as intended.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YS NEI ULi N/All degraded conditions?

ACU Units have minor surface corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduil: YED NEI U[E1 N/AE1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduit, cable tray, and raceway are rigidly supported and adequatelysupported. Fill levels look acceptable. HVAC duct is rod hung but has good clearance around it.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UEr N/A[E interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No ceiling tiles present and lights are secured with safety cables. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very Iarge (e.g.., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 394 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A901, WBN-WB-025

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NDI UD' N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

All piping appears to be correctly supported.All sprinklers have 2" minimum clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD- N/A[']

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? No combustible sources observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UD" N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Step ladder is not stowed per "TI-276"; it has a rope restrainingit.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDI U[[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Cover plate removed and improperly stored on 1-A CU-30-CRB Control Rod Drive EQRM Air Conditioner 1B. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Several lights are out in the area. Observed monorail support structure with only (3) anchorbolts installed. There are only 3 holes in the base plate. By engineeringjudgment, the frame is structurally sound. Not a significant concern. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-GEN-085-A 1-GEN-085-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 395 of 451

Status: YE* NE-- U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage °of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE] U[-] N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if Visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorage visible was in very good condition. All hardwarewas in place and tight. No significant cracking observed.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NO] UE] N/AZ1 degraded conditions?

All surfaces are painted and free of corrosion. Some mild surface corrosion was observed on some surfaces where paint has chipped or worn away.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[ N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray and conduit are rigidly mounted. HVAC is a combination of rod hung and rigid. However, both are good.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE] N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There is good clearancebetween items in the area. Very congested area but still has adequate clearance. 4 Ifthe room In which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), th earea. elected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet frot the SWEL item. Page 396 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A813, WBN-WB-026

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UE- N/AZ3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklers in the area. All fire water piping is rigidly supported. All other piping has proper supports.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustible sources observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEi U['] N/AZ' interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed (2) fire extinguisherbottles on portable cart that are not properlyrestrainedper "TI-276". Two flammable storage cabinets with no restraint..... continued under general comments.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NE] UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Barrels not properly stored. TE stored under the stairs not chained to within "2". Poor housekeeping. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-COMP-032-0060 0-COMP-032-0086 0-FCV-032-0082-A 1-TANK-070-0001 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 397 of 451

Status: YN NE] UF] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area4 A854, WBN-WB-027 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorage is painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware,loose, or damaged hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YI NEI U-1 N/AE3 degraded conditions?

All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE! UE- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interaction or overload issues.

4. Does it appear that the area, is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI U-] N/AO interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall). the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 398 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A854, WBN-WB-027

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UL] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads are presentand have adequate clearance. No other flooding concerns.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U"] N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

All batteriesare secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source. Wood scaffolding is present, but would be protected by sprinklers in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[] Ur-l N/AL]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Observed wooden scaffolding in the room. Perprocedure MMTP-102, wood scaffolding is evaluated by site SE. Scaffolding appears to be adequately restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping in this area is very good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0001-D Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 399 of 451

Status: YN No- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED NE- U-- N/AE-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchorageis painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware,loose, or damaged hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

degraded conditions? All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[-1 N/AE-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interactionor overload issues.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO N-' UE1 N/AE]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance. 4 If the roo. in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area. hould be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet fro. the SWEL item. Page 400 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A853, WBN-WB-028

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance. No other flooding concerns.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI ULI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

All batteriesare secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE UE1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0002-E Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 401 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area4 A864, WBN-WB-029 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED NEI UE- N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All anchoragevisible is painted and well maintained.No visible cracks, missing hardware, loose, or damaged hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN N-] U[] N/AZ degraded conditions?

All surfaces are painted and clean. No visible corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UiE N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduit and HVAC duct are rigidly supported. No interaction or overload issues.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NEI U--i N/A-1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Lights have safety cables. All equipment has sufficient clearance. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is locate d Is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 402 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A864, WBN-WB-029

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U[-1 N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads are present and have adequate clearance.No other flooding concerns.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[l UL- N/AL!

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? All batteries are secured and protected by racks. No other combustible source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE! N/AE3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Housekeeping in this area is excellent, no temporary equipment observed.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Housekeeping is excellent. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-BA T-236-0003-F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-2-2012 Mike Gordon 8-2-2012 Page 403 of 451

Status: Y[:] NZ UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UE-1 N/A[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All MCCs welded to embed, new chargerwith bolts all in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?

All welds painted with some minor chipping, bolts are galvanized.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UEi N/AE raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearto be overfilled. HVAC duct is rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UEi N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Cable tray support cap plate in close proximity to conduit (IPLC-803A) collar (top of MCC-213-A2, Panel 13). Upon further review with FRC it was deemed to have adequate clearance. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turblne HaiI), the area selected should be described. This selected area ahould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL Item. Page 404 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A851, WBN-WB-030

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI- NO UI- N/AZI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler head touching conduit (PLC-1 709), behind panel 10 of 1-MCC-213-A I.. All other sprinklerheads have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[-- U-1 N/AZI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles observed in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[-- UI1 N/A-1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding in area appears to be restrainedproperly. Rolling scaffold (113652196) tied-off with chain in (2) spots.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UWI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is reasonable. Some work-in-progress,but well maintained. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-MCC-213-AOOI-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-3-2012 Mike Gordon 8-3-2012 Page 405 of 451

Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 D204. WBN-WB-031 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE UE-] N/AE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All cabinets welded to embed plates and in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U-] N/AE]

degraded conditions? All welds painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE] UE] N/AF-"

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y* NEI UE] N/AE-interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintainedaround all equipment. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected areas hould be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fet fro. the SWEL item. Page 406 of 451

Location: Bldg. DG BLDG Floor El. 760 Room, Area 4 Q204, WBN-WB-031

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NIl ULI N/AE]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flood source. C02 fire protectionsystem utilized.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEI UI- N/Al]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? No fuel source observed in the area. No stored combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM Nil U[] N/Al]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? No temporary equipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIUE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. TS-13-132A (above 1-MCC-215-AO02) does not have a safety chain. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-MCC-215-AOO1-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 407 of 451

Status: YE] NZ ULJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yr-] NO UE] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Sheared bolt on 1-COND-31-289.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UE] N/A--

degraded conditions? Significant corrosion on 1-ACU-31-475 and 1-COND-31-289. After further review, deemed to be moderate corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NE] UE] N/AZ3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit and ducting rigidly supported. HVAC has flexible connections.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YIO NEI] U] N/AD interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead lighting has safety chains. Adequate clearance around equipment. 4 Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall). the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 f.et from the SWEL item. Page 408 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 786 Room, Area 4 A 924, WBN-WB-032

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Coolant lines present but adequately supported with properdrainage.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI U-- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles present

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary equipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UZ--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary) Observed (5) Lights out in room. Fairlymoist/wet environment. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FSV-031-0447-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 409 of 451

Status: Y[ NEI] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NI] UE- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No loose, missing, or broken.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UI] N/All degraded conditions?

All hardware is painted and in good condition. No observed degradation.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NI] UI- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NI] UIl N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintained aroundequipment. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hail), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based onjudgment. e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 410 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A310, WBN-WB-033

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads present,but no observed clearanceissues.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-I N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles in area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-I N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding present, but appears to have adequate clearance and proper restraint.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Removable masonry black wall present. Restrained with steel straps and anchored to concrete wall. In good condition. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-FCV-062-0093 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 411 of 451

Status: Y[ NR' U[-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UI- N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/AE]

degraded conditions? No observed degradationor corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] UE] N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Overhead conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UE] N/AE]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Adequate clearance around equipment. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the areas elected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 412 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A307, WBN-WB-034

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE' N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Sprinklerheads have adequate clearance and piping appears to be adequatelysupported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE- UE-1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding present, but appears be properly restrained with adequate clearance. Work-in-progress equipment in area with tag and housekeeping barriertape. Rolling scaffolding chained in two places.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fall harness stored under pipe chase cooler 1A-A (1-CLR-30-20 1). Loose unistrutsupports on floor without work-in-progress tag (no interactionconcern). Located on north side of pipe chase cooler. Deemed work-in-progress. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-LCV-062-O135-A 1-LCV-062-O136-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-6-2012 Mike Gordon 8-6-2012 Page 413 of 451

Status: YE N-- U[ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NE] Ur- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All equipment anchorageappearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ ND] UD- N/AD]

degraded conditions? No significant degradation.Most surfaces painted with minor chipping and mild surface corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDI UD N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded. Conduit rigidly supported as well. Piping adequately supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NEI UD" N/AD1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment and piping. 'If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is 

                                                           .ery    large  (e.g., Turbine Hail),   the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 414 of 451

Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 T7-K, WBN-WB-035

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-] U[] N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinklerheads present. No other concerns.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[W N/AW interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Oily waste containerpresent and stored/restrained.No other combustibles observed.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y2 NEI UE- N/AW interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Exhaust fans in area with wheel locks engaged. Scaffolding staging area well maintained/stored.See general comments.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr- Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Some temporary scaffolding, but appearsto have adequate restraint and clearance. Job box not restrained(chain present but not secure). Rolling conduit storage with (1) wheel lock (mechanical). Several 50 gal. drums, trash can, and oil containernot restrained.All deemed to be work-in-progress.Not a significantconcern. Observed bolt missing on 0-HTX-32-27 A/B. Determinedto be non-safety related equipment and therefore is not a potential adverse seismic condition. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 0-COMP-032-0026 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 415 of 451

Status: Y[ N[-- U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A13-R, WBN-WB-036 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UrI N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All visible anchorageappears to be free of any adverse seismic conditions. No loose, missing, or broken hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ Ni] ULI N/AEl degraded conditions?

No significant degradation.Some mild surface corrosion except on 0-PMP-31-49/1 (moderate to significant).

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NI] UEJ N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray and conduit rigidly supported and in good condition. Cable tray is not overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] U[] N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance around equipment. Piping properly supported. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is I ocated is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 416 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 737 Room, Area 4 A 13-R. WBN-WB-036

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UEI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Adequate clearance aroundsprinkler heads.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles/fuel source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unit 2 work-in-progress.Appears to be properly tagged and stored.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Unistrutstrap on top of tube steel frame (7' southwest of A15-R). The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0049/2-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 417 of 451

Status: YE NEI U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE] N/AL]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? No observed loose, missing, or broken hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI U-1 N/A--

degraded conditions? No significantdegradation. Some mild surface corrosion.Most hardware is painted and in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI Uil N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit and large bore piping is rigidly supported. All otherpiping is adequately supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI U-- N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance around equipment. Chillers covered by tube steel frame and sheet metal. Lights have safety chain/wire. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be base d on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 418 of 451

Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 Cl 10, WBN-WB-037

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UiZ N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Adequate clearance around sprinklerheads.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] Ui N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? No observed combustibles/fuel source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UEi N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Motor stored on cart with mechanical wheel locks. Work-in-progress staged equipment/panelsnot properly restrained(no interaction concern, in process of being removed). Service cartwith wire restraint and wheel stop (plannedremoval date expired).

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEi UiE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Trashcan not restrained(housekeeping). The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-CHR-031-0128 O-CHR-031-0129 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-7-2012 Mike Gordon 8-7-2012 Page 419 of 451

Status: YN No UD-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U[-1 N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

6.9KV cabinets have all (6) anchorsper panel. Relay panels are welded to embed plates.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of sigmificant YI NE] U-- N/AZ degraded conditions?

No observed degradationor corrosion.All visible anchorage is in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN N["] UZ- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearto be overloaded. Ducting is rigidly supported as well.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NEI UZ- N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overheadlighting has safety chains/wire. Equipment has adequate clearances. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be b a.sed on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 420 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A824, WBN-WB-038

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NE U-- N/AW interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Adequate clearance around sprinklerheads. Pipingis adequately supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NErI UI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles/fuel source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur- N/AW3 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to be restrainedproperly. Portablejob boxes and ladders restrained.Rolling scaffolding in front of 2-BD-21 1-B with wheel locks and (2) chains.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NWI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? No other observed potential adverse seismic conditions. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Work-in-progress well maintained/storedand labeled. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-21 1-B-B 2-BD-21 1-B-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 421 of 451

(AWC) Status: Y[* Nr- UD-- Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A803, WBN-WB-039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U-] N/AZI potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Cabinets/panelswelded to embed plates. Switches and dist. panels bolted to wall. All visible anchorage appears to be in place.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?

Welds are painted, no observed damage or corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NZI UF] N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray and conduit is rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appear to be overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NE] U-] N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintainedaround all equipment. Observed scaffolding within 1/4" of cabinet (0-BD-236-2/4). After further review, clearancewas deemed to be acceptable. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located I.... y large (e.g., Turbine Halt), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 422 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A803. WBN-WB-039

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[] U[-- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No sprinkler head clearance issues observed.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[-] N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No combustibles observed in area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[E UEZ N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding in place and appearsto be restrainedproperly. See question 4.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UZ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-DXF-237-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-8-2012 Mike Gordon 8-8-2012 Page 423 of 451

Status: YE* NEI Ur] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 480V BoardRm 1B, WBN-WB-040 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UF] N/A[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? All MCCs and Shutdown BDs welded to embed plates. At least 50-75% of bolts observed on front of Shutdown BD anchorage.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UI-] N/AEF degraded conditions?

Welds are painted, observed bolts are free of corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UFI N/ACl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC ducting and cable tray is rigidly supported and in good condition. Cable tray does not appearoverloaded. Conduit rigidly supported as well.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEl UI N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. Equipment has adequate clearance. 4 If the room In w hich the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL ite . Page 424 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 480V Board Rm lB, WBN-WB-040

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UE] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No observed clearance issues with sprinklerheads. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI U-- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U["] N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding in place and appears to have adequate clearanceand restraint.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NErI Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. Observed cable transitionfrom conduit through floor without flex conduit (north end of shutdown boards). After further review, deemed to not have any seismic related significance or concern. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-BD-212-BOO1-B 1-BD-212-BO02-B Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 425 of 451

Status: YE NF-J UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE UF] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] U-] N/AZ]

degraded conditions? All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YEK NEI UZ- N/AZl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray, conduit, and ducting is rigidly supported.All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearance maintained around air handlers and piping. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 foet from the SWEL item. Page 426 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 757 Room, Area 4 A809, WBN-WB-041

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur-- N/A[

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? Adequate sprinkler head clearance.Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No observed temporaryequipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NE-1 U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-AHU-031-0045 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 427 of 451

Status: YE N[-] U[- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI Ur- N/Ar-I potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No observed missing, loose, or damaged hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI ULi N/AEl degraded conditions?

Most visible anchorageis painted or galvanized. No observed degradationor corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN Nil UZl N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Overhead conduit and piping is rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN Nil UZl N/AZ-interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Observed FCV with 1" clearance to pipe support steel. All other equipment appearsto have adequate clearance.After further review with FRC, the valve was deemed to have adequate clearance. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item Is located is. ery large (e..g., T.rbi.e Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fcet from the SWEL item. Page 428 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 692 Room, Area 4 A306, WBN-WB-042

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Adequate clearance around sprinkler heads.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles/fuel source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI US- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary equipment or scaffolding.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-PMP-003-O00IA-S 1-TS-O01-0017A-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-9-2012 Mike Gordon 8-9-2012 Page 429 of 451

Status: YZ N[:] U[-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED NEI ULI N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NEI UE- N/AEl degraded conditions?

All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UZ] N/AZ3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray, conduit, and piping is rigidly supported. All in good condition, cable tray not overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NZI UZ- N/AZ1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearancemaintained around transformersand panels. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item i. located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaiI), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on Judg ment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 430 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 782 Room, Area 4 A902, WBN-WB-043

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UI N/A[1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Adequate sprinkler head clearance. Fire protection piping is rigidly supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI Ur1 N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UI- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No observed temporary equipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[E1 UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-OXF-068-0341A-A 0-OXF-068-0341F Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 431 of 451

Status: Y ] NE U-] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE-] U[] N/AEZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Adjacent Tank is anchoredto concrete foundation. No observed missing, loose, or damaged anchors.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/AZ degraded conditions?

Anchor assembly is painted. Some minor surface corrosionobserved. (outside/wetenvironment)

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE] NEI UE] N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

No HVAC or cable/conduitraceways.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE] N/AZ-I interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

No spatialinteractionconcerns. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area se ected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 f..t fro -the SWEL item. Page 432 of 451

Location: Bldg. N/A Floor El. 729 Room, Area 4 Yard, WBN-WB-044

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO- NEI U[-1 N/AN interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE-] NE] UE- N/AN interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UL- N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Construction of new tank.foundation in area. No observed concerns. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-TANK-063-0046 Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 433 of 451

(AWC) Status: YZ; ND- U[---] Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UI- N/AL]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Observed anchorageis free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YED NEL UL] N/AEl degraded conditions?

All anchorageis painted with minor chipping. No observed corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UIZ N/AL-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YED NEL UL-] N/AL]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No observed interactionconcerns. Adequate clearancemaintained aroundequipment in area. 4 If he room in which the SWEL item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbi.e HaII), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 fee from the SWEL item. Page 434 of 451

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-045

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-1 N/AZ1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEl UI- N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U-1 N/A[-

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Observed temporary scaffolding and shielding for the refueling outage activities. No areas of concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-TANK-068-PRT Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 435 of 451

Status: YE N[J UE] Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NiZ UZ N/A[-]
          -potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No observed loose, missing, or broken anchorage. Rad monitors, fans and panels/racksall in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NEI UL] N/A]

degraded conditions? Majority of anchorageis painted with minor chipping. Some minor corrosion present on anchoragefor AHUs, but not a concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NZI UZ] N/AZ]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Conduit and HVAC rigidly supported and in good condition. Overhead piping is rigidly supported as well.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NEI UZ] N/AZ]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? No ceiling tiles. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. 4 If the room In which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 436 of 451

Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 755 Room, Area 4 C401, WBN-WB-046

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UrI N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Observed sprinklerhead in close proximity to HVAC duct insulation. It does not appearto be touching. Insulation will allow for some movement/flexibility. Piping and HVAC duct is supported nearby.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NE-- UI1 N/AL) interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles/fuel source.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS N--] U-- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

No temporary equipment or installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) General housekeeping is good/reasonable. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: O-AHU-031-0012-A O-RE-090-0205-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-10-2012 Mike Gordon 8-10-2012 Page 437 of 451

Status: Y[* NE] U-- Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE-- UE- N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

No observed loose, missing or broken hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?

No observed degradationother than minor/mild surface corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE-- U[-1 N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC duct rigidly supported. Cable tray and conduit are rigidly supported. Cable tray does not appearto be overloaded.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YNZ NEI UE- N/AZl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintainedaround equipment. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item Is located Is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based onjudgment. e.g.. on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 438 of 451

Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 772 Room, Area 4 A 857, WBN-WB-047

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Sprinkler heads have adequate clearance.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UI- N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area? No observed combustibles in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI Ur- N/AZ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Minor temporary scaffolding, but appearsto have adequate clearance restraint.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Fire protection pipe (1-Y2 " dia.) within 1/2" of ACU-31-461. After review of WB-DC-20-32, potential spatial interaction was deemed to be credible, but not significant (not near threadedjoint). The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-AHU-031-0461-A 1-COND-031-0290-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 439 of 451

Status: Y[ N[] U-' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YS NEI UFI N/A[D potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All visible anchorageappearsto be free of loose, missing or broken hardware. Majority of panels are welded to embed plates.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI UI- N/AZ degraded conditions?

All visible welds are painted and in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDI UD- N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray is rigidly supported and does not appearoverloaded. Ducting is also rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UD- N/ADl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Adequate clearance maintained between rows of panels. Overhead lighting has safety chain/wire. 4 If the oo 

             . in which the SWEL     item Is located is very large (e.g., Turbine HaII), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 440 of 451

Location: Bldg. CNTL Floor El. 708 Room, Area 4 C201, WBN-WB-048

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U-1 N/A[Z interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flood source/concern. C02 fire suppression system.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles/fuel source in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[: U-1 N/AZl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffolding is present but appears to be restrainedproperly.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. Folding chairs and fan chained, but would not prevent items from falling. Does not appearthat this is an adverse seismic condition. Deemed work-in-progress. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-PNL-275-R 127-A 1-PNL-275-R143-A Evaluated by: Travis Hockenberry Date: 8-13-2012 Mike Gordon 8-13-2012 Page 441 of 451

Status: YE NE uF1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Note: Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown, N/A = Not Applicable

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UL- N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed anchorage is free of bent, broken, or missing hardware.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N[Z UI] N/A[-

degraded conditions? All anchorageis painted or galvanized. No observed corrosion.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UZ- N/AZ-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

All conduit and piping rigidly supported and in good condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UZ-1 N/AZ interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Very congested area, but no observed interactionconcerns. 4 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Haii), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item. Page 442 of 451

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 716 Room, Area 4 Lower Containment, WBN-WB-049

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic. YO NEI UFZ N/AZl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U-1 N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No observed combustibles.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-- N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Some minor temporary scaffolding and ladders present in area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Generalhousekeeping is good. The following equipment is included in the area encompassed by this Area Walk-By: 1-ACUM-063-0003 1-FAN-030-0038-A Evaluated by: Travis HockenberrV Date: 9-17-2012 Mike Gordon 9-17-2012 Page 443 of 451

Appendix G: Peer Review Report Page 444 of 451

FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC. Structural& Seismic Engineering @Risk Management NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 PEER REVIEW REPORT Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit I Near-Term Task Force 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns A peer review of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 (WBN1) seismic walkdowns for Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.3: Seismic was performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 50.54 (f) letter (listed as Reference 2 in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report) and the guidance provided in Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report 1025286 (listed as Reference 3 in the Seismic Response Report). A highly interactive process was utilized by the peer review team. This involved ongoing open dialog consultation with project participants throughout training, equipment selection, equipment walkdowns, area walkbys, review of potentially adverse seismic conditions and corrective action program documentation, and final report preparation. In summary, the peer review team is in full concurrence with the final results as documented in the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, and we conclude that all of the project requirements have been met and adequately documented. The following sections summarize the details of the peer review process for the major elements of the project. TRAINING The walkdown teams are described in Section 3 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report. All of the walkdown team members successfully completed the EPRI developed training on NTTF Recommendation 2.3 - Plant Seismic Walkdowns. All of the individual team members meet the qualification requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. In addition to this training, per our recommendations, all walkdown team members received additional training. The purpose of the additional training was two-fold. First, additional technical training was provided on equipment anchorage and seismic interaction evaluations, as an enhancement to the anchorage and interaction issues overview provided in the EPRI training course. Second, background information was provided on the site-specific seismic programs implemented by TVA at WBN1. This provided team members with historical background on the scope and findings of prior seismic reviews, as well as to deepened their understanding of the seismic licensing basis for WBN1. Examples of the additional plant-specific training material provided for the team members include the following:

  • Description of WBN1 seismic design basis including application of Set B and B+C seismic design response spectra for evaluation of existing plant features and new seismic design activity, respectively.
  • Overview of WBN1 seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components and discussion of how to locate calculation packages documenting acceptance.

FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, Inc.

  • 6275 University Dr., Ste. 37 e Huntsville, AL 35806-1776 e Tel: 256-679-3234 www.facilityrisk.com Page 445 of 451

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 2 of 7

  • Nuclear Performance Plan and Civil/Seismic Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) implemented prior to WBN1 start-up. This included a summary of the following major programs:
           - Seismic Analysis Program
           - Hanger Analysis and Update Program (HAAUP)
           - Equipment Seismic Qualification (ESQ)
           - Structural Steel Attachment loads, Thermal Effects, SCV Movements
           - Seismic Verification of Conduit, Cable Trays, HVAC Ducting, & Supports
           - Concrete/Masonry Wall /Embedded Plates Issues
  • Integrated Interaction Program (liP)
           - -Verification of non-safety-related Seismic Category I(L) plant features, equipment items, conduit, and HVAC duct
           - Seismic verification of Seismic category I(L) piping under the Il/I spray program
           - Suspended systems proximity clearance verifications
           - Safety-related equipment seismic proximity reviews
           - Verification of Shakespace crossings
           - SCV proximity review
           - Commodity clearance procedures in place (MAI 2.3)
  • Seismic Individual Plant Examination for External Events (IPEEE)
           - Review Level Earthquake (RLE) for seismic IPEEE implementation at WBN1
           - Scope of review and Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL)
           - Summary of WBN1 seismic IPEEE walkdown results
           - Presentation of results and governing High Confidence Low Probability of Failure (HCLPF) capacities (minimum of 0.36g)
           - Ongoing enhanced seismic IPEEE efforts to increase plant HCLPF capacity SELECTION OF ITEMS ON THE SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LIST (SWEL)

The completed SWEL as described in Section 4 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report is in full compliance with the guidelines in EPRI Report 1025286. The SWEL 1 represents a diverse sample of selected equipment and support systems required to perform the five safety functions of reactor reactivity control, reactor coolant pressure control, reactor coolant inventory control, decay heat removal, and containment function. The SWEL 1 includes, as appropriate, various types of systems, classes of equipment, and equipment environments. The SWEL 1 includes new and replacement equipment. The WBN1 IPEEE review was performed using the EPRI margins methodology and that success path based SSEL was used as a starting point for SWEL 1. No seismic PRA has been performed for WBN1 so no information regarding dominant contributors to seismic risk was available. SWEL 1 was compared to the Core Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Early Release Frequency (LERF) Rankings, and any shared equipment was noted. The SWEL 2 represents selected equipment related to the spent fuel pool system, including those that could cause rapid drain-down of the pool and accidental exposures of the fuel assemblies. There was considerable interaction between the peer review team, the walkdown team, and the equipment selection team during the course of the evaluation. The final SWEL, as documented in Section 4 and in Appendix D of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report, is a culmination of this Page 446 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 3 of 7 interaction. Examples of peer review comments that were adequately addressed and resolved during the SWEL development process include the following:

  • In the preliminary SWEL, the safety functions were not listed for each item of equipment.

This made it very difficult to ensure that all five safety functions were adequately represented. The team updated the list to clearly include the respective safety functions.

  • Based on review of the update list from the above comment, it was discovered that the reactor pressure control safety function was not adequately represented on the preliminary SWEL. It was recommended that the team add additional equipment items representative of the reactor coolant pressure control safety function. Items were added as indicated in the final SWEL
  • In order to include representative equipment items for all of the 21 classes of equipment listed in Table B-1 of the EPRI Report 1025286, items of equipment were added to the SWEL that were not part of the IPEEE review. It was noted that this was unnecessary yet conservative, so the items remained on the SWEL.
  • In the preliminary SWEL there was confusion regarding the equipment class definition of distribution panels, and low and medium voltage switchgears. This is corrected in the final SWEL, such that the 120V vital instrument power board is in the distribution panel equipment class, and the 480V shutdown boards are in the low voltage equipment class.
  • It is noted that the final SWEL adequately includes equipment in each major building structure and encompasses mild to more severe environments.
  • It is noted that there were no outliers in the WBN1 seismic IPEEE review, so there were no items of equipment that had to be added to the SWEL for confirmation of seismic IPEEE upgrades.

SEISMIC EQUIPMENT WALKDOWNS AND AREA WALKBYS The peer review team spent considerable time interfacing with the walkdown team members during the WBN1 seismic equipment walkdowns and area walkbys. This included responding to questions regarding the scope and content of the reviews. This also included in-plant observations of the teams during the reviews as well as independent in-plant reviews of individual equipment components. Walkdown observations and results were reviewed and discussed on a weekly basis with the walkdown team members. Particular emphasis was given to any items preliminarily identified as potential adverse seismic conditions (see discussion in the next section). In the end, the peer review addressed over 50% of the completed walkdown documentation forms. It is noted that the in-plant activity and over 50% documentation review is above and beyond the peer review requirements as defined in EPRI Report 1025286. As a result of this effort, we are highly confident that the teams conducted the reviews in a thorough and competent manner, and that the reviews are fully in compliance with the intent of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter. Examples of seismic issues discussed and resolved during the course of the peer review process for the WBN1 equipment seismic walkdowns and area walkbys include the following:

  • On the RHR Pump Room Cooler 11B-B, it was confirmed that the anchorage had only minor surface rust that would not significantly impact capacity. Also, it was concluded that proximity interaction with a nearby small bore pipe was credible but not significant.

Page 447 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 4 of 7

  • On the ERCW Strainer 1A-1, minor surface rust was judged to be acceptable, and proximity interaction due to vertical contact with a scaffolding pole was determined to not be significant due to massive size of strainer.
  • On the ERCW Pump A-A, the walkdown team observed that overhead scaffolding was in close proximity to a level indicator, but it was determined that the scaffolding is rigidly restrained and that the impact was not credible. Also, close proximity of an electrical conduit and a pre-lube throttle was deemed to be credible, but not significant, so accepted as-is.
  • A civil/structural feature was observed to be in close proximity (3/4" to 1") to 1-FCV-062-0093. Based on closer review, the clearance was found to be sufficient and the interaction was not credible.
  • Minor cracking of concrete was observed by the walkdown team at DG 1A-A Room Exhaust Fan 1A anchor bolts. The cracking in proximity to the anchors was determined to be less than 0.5mm and judged to not be a seismic concern.

" The corrosion noted by the walkdown on anchor bolts for the 480V BD Room 1A Supply AHU 1A-A was determined to be only minor surface rust and accepted. In addition, the close proximity of a cable tray support member to the AHU was determined to have sufficient clearance and was determined to be non-credible.

  • The walkdown team observed a potential seismic interaction flexibility concern at Electrical Board Room Chiller B-B. A 2" pipe penetrating the permanent hood continued to a rigid attachment to a 1" pipe. The screening tools in WB-DC-20-32 were implemented and the flexibility was determined to be adequate.
  • Scaffolding was observed by the walkdown team to be in close proximity to the 125V Vital Battery Board I Panel 1. Based upon further review, the 3/4" clearance was determined to be sufficient to preclude the interaction.
  • On the 125V DC Transfer Switch Select Chargers 7S/9S, the walkdown team observed that two conduit interfaces had hard connections and questioned whether flex conduit should have been used. After further consideration including implementation of screening tools from WB-DC-20-32, the configuration was determined to be acceptable.

" Minor hairline cracking at the grounding bus connection bolt for 125V Diesel Generator Battery 1B-B was identified by the walkdown team. No significant cracks were in the vicinity of the anchors and the condition was determined to not be a potential adverse seismic condition. " Temperature sensors lacking a safety cable were identified by the walkdown teams for several items of equipment. After more detailed assessment utilizing Seismic Category I(L) screening criteria of WB-DC-20-32 and WCG-2-409, these were determined to not represent a failing and falling concern.

  • During the walk-by of area A851 WBN-WB-030, a cable tray support end cap was found to be in close proximity to a conduit exiting MCC-213-A2. Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.
  • During the walkby of area A306 WBN-WB-042, 1" clearance was observed between a flow control valve and adjacent pipe support steel. Based on the screening tools in WB-DC-20-32, the clearance was found to be adequate.

Page 448 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 5 of 7 In the end, the peer review team is in concurrence with the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs) and Area Walkby Checklists (AWCs) as presented in Appendices E and F, respectively, of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report. POTENTIAL ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS The peer review team spent considerable time with the walkdown teams addressing preliminary potential adverse seismic conditions identified during walkdowns. It is noted that there were very many questions early in the walkdown review process on the conservative side of issues, and these kinds of questions diminished towards the end of the project as the judgment of the teams significantly improved. Most of these early concerns were in regards to potential seismic interaction effects. In most cases, these issues were resolved by review of prior evaluations or the TVA procedures and guidance already in place at the plant. All potential adverse seismic conditions were reviewed in detail, including working with the teams to address seismic licensing basis and operability issues for the confirmed potential adverse seismic conditions that resulted in the initiation of Problem Evaluation Reports (PERs) as part of the Corrective Action Program (CAP). In the end, the peer review team is in full concurrence with all of the potential adverse seismic conditions summarized in Section 6.2 of the WBN1 Seismic Response Report. Comments regarding the individual potential adverse seismic conditions for WBN1 include the following:

  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 1 addresses a U-bolt connection that was not tight on the Diesel Generator Engine 1A1 Start Air Receiver A. In our opinion the loose connection still provides an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 2 addresses a similar issue noted during the walkby for Diesel Generator Room D104, where an air receiver tank is not properly aligned. We judged that that the existing configuration still provided an adequate load path for design basis seismic effects. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 3 addresses missing and damaged bolts connecting adjacent Diesel Generator system I&C panels. Although the present bolts were determined to be adequate to hold the adjacent panels together, the walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 4 addresses a temporary scaffold near ERCW Pump 0-PMP-67-32 (area walkby) as a seismic interaction concern. The pump was determined to be sufficiently rugged that the potential interaction was not significant.

The walkdown team noted the non-conforming scaffold as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.

  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 5 addresses a cable tray support cap plate in contact with a conduit collar on 1-MCC-232-B-B. Detailed inspections ascertained that the adjacent MCC cubicles falling within a vertical 45 degree line of the impact location Page 449 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 6 of 7 were free of safety-related plant features. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP. Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 6 addresses a fire protection sprinkler head in contact with a conduit in the 480V Board Room 1A (area walkby). This represents a potential water spray hazard for equipment in the area. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP. The PER review by plant operations concluded that it did not affect plant safety, and a non-essential priority work order was forwarded to plant fire protection for later resolution. The basis for the disposition of the PER was not clear. Based on our recommendations, another CAP entry was initiated to enable a more thorough review of the configuration. This corrective action is currently in process.

  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 7 addresses an unrestrained copy machine in the vicinity of a control room panel. It is our judgment that the seismic accelerations and configuration geometry preclude overturning, and operations concluded that the potential impact condition to the panel did not adversely impact the functionality of the affected equipment. The walkdown team noted the non-conforming copy machine as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 8 addresses a sheared off anchor bolt on 480V Board Room Condenser B-B (from the area walkby). The remaining bolts were judged to possess sufficient capacity for adequate anchorage of the component. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 9 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller A-A. There is evidence of some material reduction. The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
   "  Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 10 addresses significant corrosion on the anchorage and base pedestal of Shutdown Board Room Chiller B-B. There is evidence of some material reduction. The remaining material was determined to possess adequate margin to resist design basis seismic loads. The walkdown team noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.
  • Potentially Adverse Seismic Condition 11 addresses anchor spacing not in compliance with design output documentation for 120V AC Vital Inverters 0-1 and 1-111. The anchorage is robust and meets design basis seismic requirements by inspection, but is outside of the dimension tolerance on the drawings. The walkdown team conservatively noted this as a potential adverse seismic condition and entered it into the CAP.

SUBMITTAL REPORT The peer review team has reviewed the WBN1 submittal report in detail and we are in full concurrence with the documented observations and findings. The report is in compliance with the guidance in EPRI Report 1025286 and meets the requirements and objectives of the NRC 50.54 (f) letter. Page 450 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.

NTTF 2.3/WBN-01 November 12, 2012 Page 7 of 7 In our opinion, the potential adverse seismic conditions identified by the program are in general only minor issues, and this is a reflection of the adequate seismic design criteria as well as the seismic-related construction and maintenance procedures that TVA has in place at WBN1. Further evaluation is ongoing for Potential Adverse Seismic Condition 6 as noted above. Sincerely, i1onU Stephen J. Eder, P.E. John 0. Dizon, P.E. Lead Peer Reviewer Peer Reviewer Page 451 of 451 FACILITY RISK CONSULTANTS, INC.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12353A251&oldid=2089739"