ML17242A096

Response to Formal Disagreement and Appeal with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, for Tactics Employed as Part of an NRC-Evaluated Force on Force Exercise - Davis-Besse Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item 05000346/20172

ML17242A096
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/31/2017
From:	Rachel Johnson Security Performance Evaluation Branch
To:	Ellis J FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Josh Berry
References
IR 2017201
Download: ML17242A096 (3)

See also: IR 05000346/2017201

Text

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

August 31, 2017

Mr. James D. Ellis

Director, Fleet Security Program

First Energy Nuclear Operating Company

341 White Pond Drive

Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1

Akron, OH 44320

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY

CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR

PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE

EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND DISPUTED ITEM

05000346/2017201-02

Dear Mr. Ellis,

Thank you for your e-mail sent by Mr. William Willis, Manager, Site Security, at Davis-Besse

Nuclear Power Station, on August 29, 2017, to the Division of Security Operations (DSO),

Security Performance Evaluation Branch with the two attachments entitled Formal

Disagreement with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as

Part of an NRC-Evaluated Force-on-Force Exercise (safeguards encrypted), in accordance

with Addendum 4 of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03 Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing.

In your attachments you dispute tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) within Scenario 1 and

Scenario 2 developed by an NRC Force-on-Force inspection team.

The NRC has carefully reviewed both of your formal escalations and concluded that the

disputed TTPs are approved for use within both the NRC-evaluated exercise scenarios for the

following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat; (2) it is supported by available data;

(3) it is within your program requirements to provide defense-in-depth; (4) it can be safely

performed and controlled; and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your sites

protective strategy.

The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from the

enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

J. Ellis 2

If you would like to appeal this decision, provide a written response within 3 days from the date

of this letter with the basis of your appeal to the Director, DSO.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Johnson, Chief

Security Performance Evaluation Branch

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Enclosures:

1. NRC Response to Disputed Item

05000346/2017201-01

2. NRC Response to Disputed Item

05000346/2017201-02

cc w/enclosures: William Willis, Manager, Site Security

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

ML17242A096

OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB

NAME J. Berry C. Johnson

SIGNATURE

DATE 8 / 29 /2017 8 / 31 /2017