ML17264A889: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:iC>CATEGORY 1 REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (R1DS)ACCE<SIQN"NBR:9705150125 DOC.DATE: 97/05/09 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY 1 iC>                 REGULATO       INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION           TEM (R1DS)
NO FACIE:50'-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.
ACCE<SIQN"NBR:9705150125             DOC.DATE:   97/05/09     NOTARIZED: NO             DOCKET  N FACIE:50'-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear           Plant, Unit 1, Rochester         G 05000244 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.         Rochester Gas     6 Electric   Corp.
Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp." RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G.
  " RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G.             Document Control Branch (Document           Control Desk)
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)DOCKET N 05000244


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Requests approval of relief request 17,rev 1 re,Class 1,ASME Section XI Category B-J,to address cast stainless base metal ultrasonic weld exams.T 05000244 E NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
Requests approval of relief request 17,rev 1 re,Class 1,ASME Section XI Category B-J,to address cast stainless base metal ultrasonic weld     exams.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A047D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: OR Submittal:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A047D         COPIES RECEIVED:LTR         ENCL       SIZE:
Inservice/Testing/Relief from ASME Code-GL-8-04 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 LA VISSING,G.
TITLE: OR Submittal: Inservice/Testing/Relief from ASME Code GL-8 -04 T
INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RAB NRR/DE/EMEB OGC/HDS3 RES/DET/EMMEB EXTERNAL: LITCO ANDERSON NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL~1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD CENTER 0 CT RES/DET/EIB NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D U E N NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).                      05000244 E
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COP1ES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 12 4.I''1 AND 5 ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
RECIPIENT             COPIES            RECIPIENT            COPIES ID CODE/NAME          LTTR ENCL        ID CODE/NAME         LTTR ENCL PD1-1 LA               ~ 1    1      PD1-1 PD                1      1 VISSING,G.                 1    1 INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RAB                 1    1            CENTER    0        1      1 NRR/DE/EMEB               1     1                       CT      1     1 OGC/HDS3                  1     0       RES/DET/EIB             1     1 RES/DET/EMMEB            1     1 EXTERNAL: LITCO ANDERSON                1     1       NOAC                    1     1 NRC PDR                  1     1 D
~89 FASTAYENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.Id6d9-D001 AREA CODE716 546-2700 ROBERT C.MECREDY Vice President Nvdeor Operotions May 9, 1997 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C.20555  
U E
N NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COP1ES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR             13   ENCL     12
 
4 .I
' '
1
 
AND 5
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~     89 FASTAYENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. Id6d9-D001       AREA CODE716 546-2700 ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice President May 9, 1997 Nvdeor Operotions U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document         Control Desk Attn:               Guy Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C.                 20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Relief Request No.17, Rev.1 Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Inservice Inspection ASME Section XI Required Examinations R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244  
Relief Request           No. 17, Rev. 1 Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Inservice Inspection ASME     Section XI Required Examinations R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244
 
==Dear Mr.          Vissing:==
 
The purpose of this letter is to seek approval of a relief request concerning Class 1, ASME Section XI Category B-J, to address Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Weld Examinations.                                            This letter supersedes,                in its  entirety,      Relief        Request        No. 17  submitted  April 9,      1997.      The      justification        and    proposed          alternatives    are  included in the attachments to this letter. It is requested that                                                  this utilized relief request                be  approved      by    June      16,    1997      in order  to be for the upcoming 1997 Outage at R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.
The request for relief is made in accordance with the provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii), in that compliance                                            with the specified requirement would result in an unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The basis of this relief deals with the employment of best effort ultrasonic examination techniques on welds associated with cast stainless                                                      I(
components.                  Due to the nature of cast stainless                                steel and associated welds, attenuation variables adversely                                              impact      the performance of ultrasonic examinations.                                        The performance    of  other volumetric techniques, such as radiography, on associated cast components will provide little increased quantitative benefit due to the high levels of background radiation that exist for the items addressed.                Note that this relief request uses the same rationale as was used to conform with Code Case N-481's part of the current ISI interval program. That code case was applied to RCP bowls made of cast stainless steel and was granted based on the inability of UT      measures          to  be  effective.
9705150125 970509 poR *oocx oeooooee P          ii "-."  '-'"- PDR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIII
 
Rochester Gas and Electric will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available for this industry problem of performing ultrasonic examinations on cast stainless components.
Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy Attachment REZ5460 xc:  Mr. Guy Vissing (Mail Stop 14B2)
Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale  Road King of Prussia,  PA  19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector
 
Relief Request  No. 17, Rev. 1 Category B-J, Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Examination I. Components    for Which  Relief is Requested:
1~    Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Cast Pump Terminal End to Cast Elbow Circumferential Welds and Associated Longitudinal    Seam  Welds.
Weld ID                      ~Te PL-FW-XIII                  Elbow-to-Pump PL-FW-XII-LR    (XIII)      Longitudinal PL-FW-XV                    Elbow-to-Pump PL-FW-XI-LR (XV)            Longitudinal
: 2. Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Inlet/Outlet Cast Elbow to Nozzle Safe End/Pipe Circumferential Welds.
Weld ID                      ~Te PL-FW-I-ASW                  Elbow-to-Safe  End PL-FW-IX-ASW                Safe End-to-Elbow PL-FW-III                    Elbow-to-Safe End PL-FW-X                      Safe End-to-Elbow PL-FW-IX                    Elbow-to-Pipe PL-FW-X-BSW                  Elbow-to-Pipe II. ASME  Requirements    for  Which Relief is Requested:
1~    Category    B-J within Table        IWB-2500-1,  specifies volumetric examination requirements that are to be performed on Terminal Ends, Longitudinal welds, as well as other welds associated with required Circumferential Welds.
: 2. Code Case N-460 specifies that a reduction in examination coverage on any Class 1 or Class 2 weld may be accepted provided the reduction in coverage for that weld is less than 10%.
III. Basis:
Supplement    4 (b)(4) of Appendix    III  identifies ultrasonic requirements on Austenitic and Dissimilar Metal scanning Welds. This paragraph further identifies that Cast items such as fittings, valve bodies, and pump casings may preclude meaningful examinations because of geometry and attenuation variables.
At R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, the Reactor Coolant Pump, Westinghouse Model 93, is cast stainless (A-351 Gr CF8M). The associated fittings (elbows) are also cast stainless (ASTM A-
 
351 Gr CFSM) and  contain longitudinal seam welds. The Reactor Coolant    Inlet/Outlet  Wrought Safe    End/Pipe    to Elbow circumferential welds consists of fittings (elbows) that are cast stainless (ASTM A-351 Gr CFSM). When employing optimized ultrasonic techniques on these cast/wrought welds, the techniques may detect large flaws (254 or greater through wall) but are relatively ineffective in detecting smaller flaws. Therefore, the sensitivity is less than that required by the code.
Cast Stainless base metal and associated welds contain large grain structures, attenuation variables impact on performance of ultrasonic examinations. Experience has shown that these materials are not always amenable to ultrasonic examination and does not produce reliable and meaningful results.
Currently, the industry s Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI)  is not addressing Cast Stainless Ultrasonic Examinations.
Due    to the highly attenuative characteristics of the austenitic grain structure, ultrasonic examination coverage to the extent that is specified within Code Case N-460 may not always be achievable.
Radiography  is an impractical technique to use and,          if applied, the alternative volumetric examinations are not expected to provide any meaningful increase in benefit beyond the alternative presented due to the high levels of background radiation emitting from these areas.
IV. Proposed Alternate Method:
None. Applicable code-required volumetric examination will be completed to the maximum extent practical (a best effort ultrasonic examination of the cast stainless welds based on state-of-the-art techniques and associated            achievable examination coverage).      Ultrasonic examinations shall be performed from the wrought side of applicable components. We will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available.        The code required surface examinations and system leakage tests    will be performed.


==Dear Mr.Vissing:==
ty}}
The purpose of this letter is to seek approval of a relief request concerning Class 1, ASME Section XI Category B-J, to address Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Weld Examinations.
This letter supersedes, in its entirety, Relief Request No.17 submitted April 9, 1997.The justification and proposed alternatives are included in the attachments to this letter.It is requested that this relief request be approved by June 16, 1997 in order to be utilized for the upcoming 1997 Outage at R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.The request for relief is made in accordance with the provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii), in that compliance with the specified requirement would result in an unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.The basis of this relief deals with the employment of best effort ultrasonic examination techniques on welds associated with cast stainless components.
Due to the nature of cast stainless steel and associated welds, attenuation variables adversely impact the performance of ultrasonic examinations.
The performance of other volumetric techniques, such as radiography, on associated cast components will provide little increased quantitative benefit due to the high levels of background radiation that exist for the items addressed.
Note that this relief request uses the same rationale as was used to conform with Code Case N-481's part of the current ISI interval program.That code case was applied to RCP bowls made of cast stainless steel and was granted based on the inability of UT measures to be effective.
I(9705150125 970509 poR*oocx oeooooee P ii"-."'-'"-PDR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIII Rochester Gas and Electric will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available for this industry problem of performing ultrasonic examinations on cast stainless components.
Very truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy Attachment REZ5460 xc: Mr.Guy Vissing (Mail Stop 14B2)Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C.20555 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector Relief Request No.17, Rev.1 Category B-J, Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Examination I.Components for Which Relief is Requested:
1~Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Cast Pump Terminal End to Cast Elbow Circumferential Welds and Associated Longitudinal Seam Welds.Weld ID PL-FW-XIII PL-FW-XII-LR (XIII)PL-FW-XV PL-FW-XI-LR (XV)~Te Elbow-to-Pump Longitudinal Elbow-to-Pump Longitudinal 2.Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Inlet/Outlet Cast Elbow to Nozzle Safe End/Pipe Circumferential Welds.Weld ID~Te PL-FW-I-ASW PL-FW-IX-ASW PL-FW-III PL-FW-X PL-FW-IX PL-FW-X-BSW Elbow-to-Safe End Safe End-to-Elbow Elbow-to-Safe End Safe End-to-Elbow Elbow-to-Pipe Elbow-to-Pipe II.ASME Requirements for Which Relief is Requested:
1~Category B-J within Table IWB-2500-1, specifies volumetric examination requirements that are to be performed on Terminal Ends, Longitudinal welds, as well as other welds associated with required Circumferential Welds.2.Code Case N-460 specifies that a reduction in examination coverage on any Class 1 or Class 2 weld may be accepted provided the reduction in coverage for that weld is less than 10%.III.Basis: Supplement 4 (b)(4)of Appendix III identifies ultrasonic scanning requirements on Austenitic and Dissimilar Metal Welds.This paragraph further identifies that Cast items such as fittings, valve bodies, and pump casings may preclude meaningful examinations because of geometry and attenuation variables.
At R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, the Reactor Coolant Pump, Westinghouse Model 93, is cast stainless (A-351 Gr CF8M).The associated fittings (elbows)are also cast stainless (ASTM A-351 Gr CFSM)and contain longitudinal seam welds.The Reactor Coolant Inlet/Outlet Wrought Safe End/Pipe to Elbow circumferential welds consists of fittings (elbows)that are cast stainless (ASTM A-351 Gr CFSM).When employing optimized ultrasonic techniques on these cast/wrought welds, the techniques may detect large flaws (254 or greater through wall)but are relatively ineffective in detecting smaller flaws.Therefore, the sensitivity is less than that required by the code.Cast Stainless base metal and associated welds contain large grain structures, attenuation variables impact on performance of ultrasonic examinations.
Experience has shown that these materials are not always amenable to ultrasonic examination and does not produce reliable and meaningful results.Currently, the industry s Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI)is not addressing Cast Stainless Ultrasonic Examinations.
Due to the highly attenuative characteristics of the austenitic grain structure, ultrasonic examination coverage to the extent that is specified within Code Case N-460 may not always be achievable.
Radiography is an impractical technique to use and, if applied, the alternative volumetric examinations are not expected to provide any meaningful increase in benefit beyond the alternative presented due to the high levels of background radiation emitting from these areas.IV.Proposed Alternate Method: None.Applicable code-required volumetric examination will be completed to the maximum extent practical (a best effort ultrasonic examination of the cast stainless welds based on state-of-the-art techniques and associated achievable examination coverage).
Ultrasonic examinations shall be performed from the wrought side of applicable components.
We will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available.
The code required surface examinations and system leakage tests will be performed.
t y}}

Revision as of 16:58, 29 October 2019

Requests Approval of Relief Request 17,rev 1 Re Class 1,ASME Section XI Category B-J,to Address Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Weld Exams
ML17264A889
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 05/09/1997
From: Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9705150125
Download: ML17264A889 (7)


Text

CATEGORY 1 iC> REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (R1DS)

ACCE<SIQN"NBR:9705150125 DOC.DATE: 97/05/09 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET N FACIE:50'-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.

" RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VISSING,G. Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Requests approval of relief request 17,rev 1 re,Class 1,ASME Section XI Category B-J,to address cast stainless base metal ultrasonic weld exams.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A047D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: Inservice/Testing/Relief from ASME Code GL-8 -04 T

NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 E

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-1 LA ~ 1 1 PD1-1 PD 1 1 VISSING,G. 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RAB 1 1 CENTER 0 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 CT 1 1 OGC/HDS3 1 0 RES/DET/EIB 1 1 RES/DET/EMMEB 1 1 EXTERNAL: LITCO ANDERSON 1 1 NOAC 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 D

U E

N NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COP1ES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 12

4 .I

' '

1

AND 5

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 FASTAYENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. Id6d9-D001 AREA CODE716 546-2700 ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice President May 9, 1997 Nvdeor Operotions U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Attn: Guy Vissing Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Relief Request No. 17, Rev. 1 Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Inservice Inspection ASME Section XI Required Examinations R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244

Dear Mr. Vissing:

The purpose of this letter is to seek approval of a relief request concerning Class 1, ASME Section XI Category B-J, to address Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Weld Examinations. This letter supersedes, in its entirety, Relief Request No. 17 submitted April 9, 1997. The justification and proposed alternatives are included in the attachments to this letter. It is requested that this utilized relief request be approved by June 16, 1997 in order to be for the upcoming 1997 Outage at R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

The request for relief is made in accordance with the provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii), in that compliance with the specified requirement would result in an unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The basis of this relief deals with the employment of best effort ultrasonic examination techniques on welds associated with cast stainless I(

components. Due to the nature of cast stainless steel and associated welds, attenuation variables adversely impact the performance of ultrasonic examinations. The performance of other volumetric techniques, such as radiography, on associated cast components will provide little increased quantitative benefit due to the high levels of background radiation that exist for the items addressed. Note that this relief request uses the same rationale as was used to conform with Code Case N-481's part of the current ISI interval program. That code case was applied to RCP bowls made of cast stainless steel and was granted based on the inability of UT measures to be effective.

9705150125 970509 poR *oocx oeooooee P ii "-." '-'"- PDR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIII

Rochester Gas and Electric will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available for this industry problem of performing ultrasonic examinations on cast stainless components.

Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy Attachment REZ5460 xc: Mr. Guy Vissing (Mail Stop 14B2)

Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector

Relief Request No. 17, Rev. 1 Category B-J, Cast Stainless Base Metal Ultrasonic Examination I. Components for Which Relief is Requested:

1~ Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Cast Pump Terminal End to Cast Elbow Circumferential Welds and Associated Longitudinal Seam Welds.

Weld ID ~Te PL-FW-XIII Elbow-to-Pump PL-FW-XII-LR (XIII) Longitudinal PL-FW-XV Elbow-to-Pump PL-FW-XI-LR (XV) Longitudinal

2. Class 1, Category B-J, Reactor Coolant Inlet/Outlet Cast Elbow to Nozzle Safe End/Pipe Circumferential Welds.

Weld ID ~Te PL-FW-I-ASW Elbow-to-Safe End PL-FW-IX-ASW Safe End-to-Elbow PL-FW-III Elbow-to-Safe End PL-FW-X Safe End-to-Elbow PL-FW-IX Elbow-to-Pipe PL-FW-X-BSW Elbow-to-Pipe II. ASME Requirements for Which Relief is Requested:

1~ Category B-J within Table IWB-2500-1, specifies volumetric examination requirements that are to be performed on Terminal Ends, Longitudinal welds, as well as other welds associated with required Circumferential Welds.

2. Code Case N-460 specifies that a reduction in examination coverage on any Class 1 or Class 2 weld may be accepted provided the reduction in coverage for that weld is less than 10%.

III. Basis:

Supplement 4 (b)(4) of Appendix III identifies ultrasonic requirements on Austenitic and Dissimilar Metal scanning Welds. This paragraph further identifies that Cast items such as fittings, valve bodies, and pump casings may preclude meaningful examinations because of geometry and attenuation variables.

At R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, the Reactor Coolant Pump, Westinghouse Model 93, is cast stainless (A-351 Gr CF8M). The associated fittings (elbows) are also cast stainless (ASTM A-

351 Gr CFSM) and contain longitudinal seam welds. The Reactor Coolant Inlet/Outlet Wrought Safe End/Pipe to Elbow circumferential welds consists of fittings (elbows) that are cast stainless (ASTM A-351 Gr CFSM). When employing optimized ultrasonic techniques on these cast/wrought welds, the techniques may detect large flaws (254 or greater through wall) but are relatively ineffective in detecting smaller flaws. Therefore, the sensitivity is less than that required by the code.

Cast Stainless base metal and associated welds contain large grain structures, attenuation variables impact on performance of ultrasonic examinations. Experience has shown that these materials are not always amenable to ultrasonic examination and does not produce reliable and meaningful results.

Currently, the industry s Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI) is not addressing Cast Stainless Ultrasonic Examinations.

Due to the highly attenuative characteristics of the austenitic grain structure, ultrasonic examination coverage to the extent that is specified within Code Case N-460 may not always be achievable.

Radiography is an impractical technique to use and, if applied, the alternative volumetric examinations are not expected to provide any meaningful increase in benefit beyond the alternative presented due to the high levels of background radiation emitting from these areas.

IV. Proposed Alternate Method:

None. Applicable code-required volumetric examination will be completed to the maximum extent practical (a best effort ultrasonic examination of the cast stainless welds based on state-of-the-art techniques and associated achievable examination coverage). Ultrasonic examinations shall be performed from the wrought side of applicable components. We will continue to evaluate new emerging inspection technology as they become available. The code required surface examinations and system leakage tests will be performed.

ty