ML18142A560

Forwards Survey Form Re Integrated Schedules for Plant Mods, Per Generic Ltr 85-07.Addl Info Re Late Submittal of Integrated Living Schedule License Amend Provided During 850315 Meeting

ML18142A560
Person / Time
Site:	Surry, North Anna, 05000000
Issue date:	07/05/1985
From:	Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	Harold Denton, Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
85-362, GL-85-07, GL-85-7, NUDOCS 8507120135
Download: ML18142A560 (4)

Text

U'.1LLMM L STEWART Nuclear Operations Department Vice President Nuclear Operations e e Post Office Box 26666 OneJames River Plaza Richmond, Virginia 23261 July 5, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: Mr. H. L. Thompson, Jr., Director E&C/RWC:cwh

• VIRGINIA POWER Serial No.85-362 Docket Nos. 50-280 Division of Licensing 50-281 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 50-338 Washington, D. C. 20555 50-339 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 NPF-4 NPF-7 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA POWER NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 SURRY POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED SCHEDULES FOR PLANT MODIFICATIONS As requested by Generic Letter 85-07, dated May 2, 1985, the completed survey form regarding integrated schedules for plant modifications is provided. in Attachment 1. In a meeting with members of the NRG staff on March 15, 1985, we provided additional information concerning our intention to submit an integrated living schedule license amendment late this year.

If you would like additional information on this subject, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

~~------=

~y w. tewart Attachment

---

------ ----- ------1 95071~0

~DR M 00 1~~ g~g68~ao

.PDR-i l101JI

'/,

e e cc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator

• VIRGINIA POWER Region II Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station Mr. D. J. Burke NRC Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactor Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Mr. Edward J. Butcher, Acting Chief Operating Reactor Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing

' - e

.>

AITACHMENT RESPONSE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-07 PLANT NAME:

North Anna and Surry Power Stations UTILITY:

Virginia Power I. INTENTIONS A. Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS Yes B. Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS N/A C. Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff N/A D. Plan to implement an informal ILS only STATUS A. If you answered I.A above:

1. Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant(s)?

Circle One: Yes (No)*

If yes, select best description:

Engineering judgment SEE~'<'

Analytic Hiearchy process Risk based analysis Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)

If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:

10/85 Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:

N/A Date

• Current engineering judgment based priority matrix is being reviewed and will be revised as appropriate.

e e

2. What is your estimated date for making a submittal to the NRC-12/85 or Date If not presently available, planned date for scheduling a submittal to the NRC B. If you answered I.B above: - N/A

1. Please explain your reservations on separate sheet(s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet(s) N/A or Separate submittal scheduled for N/A Date

2. If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact/Time Frame N/A

---

Phone Number C. If you answered I.C - N/A

1. Would you be willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility(s)?

Circle One: (Yes) No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.

Contact Meeting with NRC already held March 15, 1985 Time Frame If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated III. ADDITIONAL Please make any suggestions you may have as to how a utility sponsored availability /reliability project might be credited for plant safety enhancement. Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.

NONE