NRC-2018-0263, Comment (1) by Anonymous Individual Opposing Extension for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 12/18/18 8:47 AMReceived:
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD=Beverly Clayton, Sharon Bennett,      As of: 12/18/18 8:47 AM Farideh Saba          Received: December 14, 2018 Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION                                    COMMENT (1)
December 14, 2018Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
PUBLICATION DATE:
1k2-973s-fksuComments Due:
Tracking No. 1k2-973s-fksu 11/14/2018            Comments Due: December 14, 2018 CITATION 83 FR 56876  Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0263 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Comment On: NRC-2018-0263-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2018-0263-DRAFT-0001 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-24814 Submitter Information Name: Anon Anon General Comment I object to this extension. This simply increases risk for a longer period and in a time when a large earthquake may hit. Watts Bar was just hit by a 4.4 M quake. The next one could be worse. Impacts of a nuclear accident would be devastating for most of the country. Watts Bar is own by the US government and should be held to higher standards, not weaker ones. Instead, TVA appears plagued by corruption. Shame, shame on you.
December 14, 2018 Submission Type:
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483994e62&format=xml&showorig=false                        12/18/2018}}
Web Docket: NRC-2018-0263 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Comment On:
NRC-2018-0263-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Document:
NRC-2018-0263-DRAFT-0001 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-24814 Submitter InformationName: Anon Anon General Comment I object to this extension. This simply increases risk for a longer period and in a time when a large earthquake may hit. Watts Bar was just hit by a 4.4 M quake. The next one could be worse. Impacts of a nuclear accident would be devastating for most of th e country. Watts Bar is own by the US government and should be held to higher standards, not weaker ones. Instead, TVA appears plagued by corruption. Shame, shame on you.
Page 1 of 1 12/18/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/g etcontent?objectId=0900006483994e62&fo rmat=xml&showorig=fals e}}

Revision as of 08:13, 20 October 2019

Comment (1) by Anonymous Individual Opposing Extension for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2
ML18352A693
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/2018
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
83FR56876 00001, NRC-2018-0263
Download: ML18352A693 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD=Beverly Clayton, Sharon Bennett, As of: 12/18/18 8:47 AM Farideh Saba Received: December 14, 2018 Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION COMMENT (1)

PUBLICATION DATE:

Tracking No. 1k2-973s-fksu 11/14/2018 Comments Due: December 14, 2018 CITATION 83 FR 56876 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0263 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Comment On: NRC-2018-0263-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2018-0263-DRAFT-0001 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-24814 Submitter Information Name: Anon Anon General Comment I object to this extension. This simply increases risk for a longer period and in a time when a large earthquake may hit. Watts Bar was just hit by a 4.4 M quake. The next one could be worse. Impacts of a nuclear accident would be devastating for most of the country. Watts Bar is own by the US government and should be held to higher standards, not weaker ones. Instead, TVA appears plagued by corruption. Shame, shame on you.

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006483994e62&format=xml&showorig=false 12/18/2018