ML19093A941: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.; -~ L .,.. ':~ . e VIRGINIA.
{{#Wiki_filter:.;
ELECTRIC .A.ND POWER COMl'ANY _R1011M0No;V1R0INIA.
                ':~  .
23261_ . .
e
* Jvlarch* 10,
  -~
* 1978_ Hr~ James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enf°orceiri:ent U. s. Nuclear Regulatory Connnission Region *_II -* Suite_ 818 * .. 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest.  
        .,..
-Atlanta, Georgia 30303 *  
VIRGINIA. ELECTRIC .A.ND POWER COMl'ANY
_R1011M0No;V1R0INIA. 23261_ .
                                                  .* Jvlarch* 10,
* 1978_
Hr~ James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enf°orceiri:ent U. s. Nuclear Regulatory Connnission Region *_II -
* Suite_ 818           *
        .. 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest. -
Atlanta, Georgia 30303                   *


==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==


This is *in *response to your letter of February 21, 1978 .in reference to the
This is *in *response to your letter of February 21, 1978 .in reference to the
* inspection condu_cted at_ Surry Power Station on December 20-21, 1977, January 10--13, 16-19 and 25, 1978 and reported in lE Inspecticm**Report Nos. 50-280/78-:0l and so::..281/1s-01.
* inspection condu_cted at_ Surry Power Station on December 20-21, 1977, January 10-
          - 13, 16-19 and 25, 1978 and reported in lE Inspecticm**Report Nos. 50-280/78-:0l and so::..281/1s-01.
* We have* reviewed your *letter and the enclos¢d inspection reports. _Our re-_*
* We have* reviewed your *letter and the enclos¢d inspection reports. _Our re-_*
* spouse to.*the specific*
* spouse to.*the specific* infraction is contained in .the attachme11t                       to this-_let.ter.'_
infraction is contained in .the attachme11t to this-_let.ter.'_ . l~egarding Type A containment testing o~ Surry Unit .~~s.--1 and 2, we intend to petform'this test OU both units prior _to-reactor startup followlng their. spective*
                    . l~egarding Type A containment testing o~ Surry Unit .~~s.-- 1 and 2,                   we intend to petform'this test OU both units prior _to-reactor startup followlng their.                         re-spective* steam generator *replacement outage~ *. 'He intend*-.to perform these tests in accordance*witl-1: the current Apperidi.."{ J (February- 14,-*1973)'; however, this is*
steam generator  
_contingent upon the approval by the Division of -Nuclear Reactor Regula_tioil .of the necessary changes t*o our Technical Sp~cifications.                                       .   .-
*replacement outage~ *. 'He intend*-.to perform these tests in accordance*witl-1:
We .have determined .that no.*proprietary- information is contained in the~re-ports._ .-Accordingly~* the Virginia _Electric and Power Company interposes* no objec*~
the current Apperidi.."{
tion to these* *insJ.)ection_ reports be:f.ng made _a matter of* public: di_1;1cloE1ute.
J (February-14,-*1973)';
* Vcry truly_ yours,_
however, this is* _ contingent upon the approval by the Division of -Nuclear Reactor Regula_tioil . of the necessary changes t*o our Technical Sp~cifications. . .-We .have determined .that no.*proprietary-information is contained in ports._ .-Accordingly~*
                                                                                ,0.- };/?, \,z!1ac:6;-i,a1 C. H. Stallings .       -
the Virginia _Electric and Power Company interposes*
Vice President. - -Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment cc:      nr.
no objec*~ tion to these* *insJ.)ection_
* Albert S chwincer /                          ' '
reports be:f.ng made _a matter of* public: di_1;1cloE1ute.
                                                                      *,-------   ------..,
* Attachment cc: nr.
                                                                                        '
* Albert S chwincer / V cry truly_ yours,_ ,0.-};/?, \,z!1ac:6;-i,a1 C. H. Stallings . -Vice President.  
                                                                        '
--Power Supply and Production Operations  
                                                                                      --
' ' ' *,-------------.., ' ' --r:=:l)75Cl():3!=:
                                                                        'r:=:l)75Cl():3!=:
r--.... *a e RESPONSE TO* INFRACTION LISTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/78-01, 50-281/78-01 e NRC Comment Surry Power Station Technical Specification 6.6.2.a. states that reportable occurrences which require prompt notification be followed by a written report within two weeks. Contrary to the above: The licensee submitted the written followup report on November 15, 1977,
L
* for a valve. pit flooding incident which occurred -on October 11, 1Q77 (LER 77~021/ 01-T-0) approximately 3 weeks in excess of the requirement.
 
Response The infraction listed above is correct as stated in the inspection reports. 1. 2. 3. Corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved.
r--                                   e                                e RESPONSE TO* INFRACTION
A review of the functions of the operations.support staff at the corporate offices has been completed.
    ....
It has been determined that one individual should be dedicated to follow up all correspondence required for the office of Inspection and Enforcement.
  *a                                 LISTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/78-01, 50-281/78-01 NRC Comment Surry Power Station Technical Specification 6.6.2.a. states that reportable occurrences which require prompt notification be followed by a written report within two weeks.
An individual has been identified to fill this position.
Contrary to the above:
We believe that this will minL~ize the possibility of similar violations in the future. Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further non-compliance.
The licensee submitted the written followup report on November 15, 1977,
* for a valve. pit flooding incident which occurred -on October 11, 1Q77 (LER 77~021/
01-T-0) approximately 3 weeks in excess of the requirement.
 
===Response===
The infraction listed above is correct as stated in the inspection reports.
: 1. Corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved.
A review of the functions of the operations.support staff at the corporate offices has been completed. It has been determined that one individual should be dedicated to follow up all correspondence required for the office of Inspection and Enforcement. An individual has been identified to fill this position. We believe that this will minL~ize the possibility of similar violations in the future.
: 2. Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further non-compliance.
We believe that the.above listed corrective steps will be sufficient.
We believe that the.above listed corrective steps will be sufficient.
Date when full compliance will be-achieved.
: 3. Date when full compliance will be-achieved.
Full compliance has been achieved in that the subject LER has been mitted to NRC Region II.}}
Full compliance has been achieved in that the subject LER has been sub-mitted to NRC Region II.}}

Revision as of 22:03, 19 October 2019

Response to a Letter of 02/21/1978 in Reference to the Inspection Conducted on 0812/20-21/1977, 01/10-13/1978, 01/16-19/1978 & 01/25/1978 and Reported in Inspection Reports IE-05000280/1978001 & 05000281/1978001
ML19093A941
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 03/10/1978
From: Stallings C
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
To: O'Reilly J
NRC/IE, NRC/RGN-II
References
IR 1978001
Download: ML19093A941 (2)


Text

.;

':~ .

e

-~

.,..

VIRGINIA. ELECTRIC .A.ND POWER COMl'ANY

_R1011M0No;V1R0INIA. 23261_ .

.* Jvlarch* 10,

  • 1978_

Hr~ James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enf°orceiri:ent U. s. Nuclear Regulatory Connnission Region *_II -

  • Suite_ 818 *

.. 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest. -

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 *

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

This is *in *response to your letter of February 21, 1978 .in reference to the

  • inspection condu_cted at_ Surry Power Station on December 20-21, 1977, January 10-

- 13, 16-19 and 25, 1978 and reported in lE Inspecticm**Report Nos. 50-280/78-:0l and so::..281/1s-01.

  • We have* reviewed your *letter and the enclos¢d inspection reports. _Our re-_*
  • spouse to.*the specific* infraction is contained in .the attachme11t to this-_let.ter.'_

. l~egarding Type A containment testing o~ Surry Unit .~~s.-- 1 and 2, we intend to petform'this test OU both units prior _to-reactor startup followlng their. re-spective* steam generator *replacement outage~ *. 'He intend*-.to perform these tests in accordance*witl-1: the current Apperidi.."{ J (February- 14,-*1973)'; however, this is*

_contingent upon the approval by the Division of -Nuclear Reactor Regula_tioil .of the necessary changes t*o our Technical Sp~cifications. . .-

We .have determined .that no.*proprietary- information is contained in the~re-ports._ .-Accordingly~* the Virginia _Electric and Power Company interposes* no objec*~

tion to these* *insJ.)ection_ reports be:f.ng made _a matter of* public: di_1;1cloE1ute.

  • Vcry truly_ yours,_

,0.- };/?, \,z!1ac:6;-i,a1 C. H. Stallings . -

Vice President. - -Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment cc: nr.

  • Albert S chwincer / ' '
  • ,------- ------..,

'

'

--

'r:=:l)75Cl():3!=:

L

r-- e e RESPONSE TO* INFRACTION

....

  • a LISTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/78-01, 50-281/78-01 NRC Comment Surry Power Station Technical Specification 6.6.2.a. states that reportable occurrences which require prompt notification be followed by a written report within two weeks.

Contrary to the above:

The licensee submitted the written followup report on November 15, 1977,

  • for a valve. pit flooding incident which occurred -on October 11, 1Q77 (LER 77~021/

01-T-0) approximately 3 weeks in excess of the requirement.

Response

The infraction listed above is correct as stated in the inspection reports.

1. Corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved.

A review of the functions of the operations.support staff at the corporate offices has been completed. It has been determined that one individual should be dedicated to follow up all correspondence required for the office of Inspection and Enforcement. An individual has been identified to fill this position. We believe that this will minL~ize the possibility of similar violations in the future.

2. Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further non-compliance.

We believe that the.above listed corrective steps will be sufficient.

3. Date when full compliance will be-achieved.

Full compliance has been achieved in that the subject LER has been sub-mitted to NRC Region II.