Press Release-IV-96-058, NRC Proposes $13,000 Fine Against Cti Alaska, Inc. for Radiation Worker Exposure Incident: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML003706540 | |||
| issue date = 11/01/1996 | |||
| title = Press Release-IV-96-058, NRC Proposes $13,000 Fine Against Cti Alaska, Inc. for Radiation Worker Exposure Incident | |||
| author name = Henderson B | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/OPA/RGN-IV/FO | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = Press Release-IV-96-058 | |||
| document type = Press Release | |||
| page count = 2 | |||
| newsletter region = NRC Region IV | |||
| newsletter year = 2096 | |||
| newsletter integer = 58 | |||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionOfficeofPublicAffairs,RegionIV611RyanPlazaDrive-Suite400Arlington,Texas76011-8064RIV:96-58FORIMMEDIATERELEASECONTACT:BreckHendersonNovember1,1996 OFFICE:817/860-8128 PAGER:(800)443-7243(065477) | |||
E-MAIL:bwh@nrc.govNRCPROPOSES$13,000FINEAGAINSTCTIALASKA,INC.FORRADIATIONWORKEREXPOSUREINCIDENTTheNuclearRegulatoryCommissionhasproposeda$13,000fineagainstCTIAlaska,Inc.,ofAnchorage,foranincidentin whichaworkerwasexposedtoexcessradiationaftera radiographiccameramalfunctioned.Theworkerdidnotreceive morethanhisallowedmaximumannualdoseof5rem.TheincidenttookplaceatEndicottIsland,NorthSlope,duringthenightshiftonDecember23-24,1995.Afterusinga radiographiccamera,workersdidnotrealizethattheradiation sourcefailedtofullyretractintoitsshieldedcontainerwhena safetylatchinsidethelockingmechanismprematurelyengaged.A radiographiccameraisusedinindustrialapplications,muchlike anX-raymachineisusedinmedicine,todetectflawsindense metalobjects.Theworker,calledaradiographer,istrainedintheuseofthecameraandinproperhandlingofradiationsources.Inthis case,theradiographerdidnotperformanadequateradiation surveyasrequiredatthecompletionofthejob,whichwouldhave detectedtheunshieldedradiationsource.Healsofailedto assurehewaswearingafunctioningalarmratemeter,asafety devicethatwouldhavewarnedhimhewasworkinginaradiation field.BothfailuresareviolationsofNRCregulations.Whentheradiographermadeasecondcheckofhisradiationsurveyinstrumentandlookedathispocketdosimeter,asecond personalradiationmonitoringdeviceheisrequiredtocarry,he realizedhehadbeenworkinginahighradiationfield.However, hethenfailedtocontacthissupervisorimmediately.When contacted,thesupervisorfailedtoimmediatelycontactthe company'sradiationsafetyofficer,andthecompanydidnot promptlyprocesstheradiographer'sfilmbadge,athirdpersonal radiationmonitoringdevicethatwouldindicatetheexactdosehe received.TheseactionsarerequiredbyNRC-mandatedsafety proceduresandrepresentviolations.NRCRegionalAdministratorJoeCallansaid,inalettertoCTIpresidentGeorgeE.Haugen,"[Thefirsttwoviolations]are significantbecausetheyrepresenttwobreachedsafetybarriers thataredesignedtopreventoverexposurestoradiographersandthepublic.[Thethirdandfourthviolations]arealso significantbecausetheyresultedinadelayinCTI's notificationsandresponsetotheincident...Therefore,theseviolationsareclassifiedintheaggregate...asa SeverityLevelIIproblem."TheNRCratesincidentsonafour-level scale,withLevelIbeingthemostsevere.Mr.CallannotedintheletterthatCTIhastakenextensivecorrectiveactionswhichincludediscipliningtheradiographers involved,improvedemphasisonreportingofincidents,posting safetymemosregardingtheincident,increasedfrequencyof safetyaudits,additionaltrainingonproperuseofthe radiographycamera,andassignmentofanewsafetycoordinator.CTImustrespondtotheNoticeofViolationinwritingwithin30days.Theresponsemustdocumentspecificactions takentopreventrecurrenceoftheincident.Duringthistime theCompanymaypaythefineorfileaprotest. | |||
####}} | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 14 July 2019
| ML003706540 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/01/1996 |
| From: | Henderson B Office of Public Affairs Region IV |
| To: | |
| Category:Press Release | |
| References | |
| Press Release-IV-96-058 | |
| Download: ML003706540 (2) | |
Text
U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionOfficeofPublicAffairs,RegionIV611RyanPlazaDrive-Suite400Arlington,Texas76011-8064RIV:96-58FORIMMEDIATERELEASECONTACT:BreckHendersonNovember1,1996 OFFICE:817/860-8128 PAGER:(800)443-7243(065477)
E-MAIL:bwh@nrc.govNRCPROPOSES$13,000FINEAGAINSTCTIALASKA,INC.FORRADIATIONWORKEREXPOSUREINCIDENTTheNuclearRegulatoryCommissionhasproposeda$13,000fineagainstCTIAlaska,Inc.,ofAnchorage,foranincidentin whichaworkerwasexposedtoexcessradiationaftera radiographiccameramalfunctioned.Theworkerdidnotreceive morethanhisallowedmaximumannualdoseof5rem.TheincidenttookplaceatEndicottIsland,NorthSlope,duringthenightshiftonDecember23-24,1995.Afterusinga radiographiccamera,workersdidnotrealizethattheradiation sourcefailedtofullyretractintoitsshieldedcontainerwhena safetylatchinsidethelockingmechanismprematurelyengaged.A radiographiccameraisusedinindustrialapplications,muchlike anX-raymachineisusedinmedicine,todetectflawsindense metalobjects.Theworker,calledaradiographer,istrainedintheuseofthecameraandinproperhandlingofradiationsources.Inthis case,theradiographerdidnotperformanadequateradiation surveyasrequiredatthecompletionofthejob,whichwouldhave detectedtheunshieldedradiationsource.Healsofailedto assurehewaswearingafunctioningalarmratemeter,asafety devicethatwouldhavewarnedhimhewasworkinginaradiation field.BothfailuresareviolationsofNRCregulations.Whentheradiographermadeasecondcheckofhisradiationsurveyinstrumentandlookedathispocketdosimeter,asecond personalradiationmonitoringdeviceheisrequiredtocarry,he realizedhehadbeenworkinginahighradiationfield.However, hethenfailedtocontacthissupervisorimmediately.When contacted,thesupervisorfailedtoimmediatelycontactthe company'sradiationsafetyofficer,andthecompanydidnot promptlyprocesstheradiographer'sfilmbadge,athirdpersonal radiationmonitoringdevicethatwouldindicatetheexactdosehe received.TheseactionsarerequiredbyNRC-mandatedsafety proceduresandrepresentviolations.NRCRegionalAdministratorJoeCallansaid,inalettertoCTIpresidentGeorgeE.Haugen,"[Thefirsttwoviolations]are significantbecausetheyrepresenttwobreachedsafetybarriers thataredesignedtopreventoverexposurestoradiographersandthepublic.[Thethirdandfourthviolations]arealso significantbecausetheyresultedinadelayinCTI's notificationsandresponsetotheincident...Therefore,theseviolationsareclassifiedintheaggregate...asa SeverityLevelIIproblem."TheNRCratesincidentsonafour-level scale,withLevelIbeingthemostsevere.Mr.CallannotedintheletterthatCTIhastakenextensivecorrectiveactionswhichincludediscipliningtheradiographers involved,improvedemphasisonreportingofincidents,posting safetymemosregardingtheincident,increasedfrequencyof safetyaudits,additionaltrainingonproperuseofthe radiographycamera,andassignmentofanewsafetycoordinator.CTImustrespondtotheNoticeofViolationinwritingwithin30days.Theresponsemustdocumentspecificactions takentopreventrecurrenceoftheincident.Duringthistime theCompanymaypaythefineorfileaprotest.