NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[ML13211A261]]
| number = ML13211A261
| issue date = 07/25/2013
| title = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14
| author name =
| author affiliation = Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000425
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = NL-13-1236
| document report number = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 57
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2'- 24o3 -74T 00. Equip. Class" 2  /,4A//( -ez6L4$ 2/Equipment Description z9/'.:,'-
Pu 4 71 0/f D0,4y 7-,q ,,<i Location:
Bldg. 9 r'7 Floor El. ZZO " Room, Area &?el&#xfd; A/i2o'T<-7 ?/,/ 1,.Manufacturer.
Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YP NC UC N/AC YX NCI UC N/AC-]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? N- UC N/AX U' 64.be~o covvSer~od To Rk'f77~5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
YPQ NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
A/ _ __ __- o7A 00: ' 14R. 2.0 7/ r//7,6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJX NCI UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?" Enter the equipmcnt class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 243 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment
[D No. 2- 04o9- -.O;:?Equip.
Class" 7"A,4-K -C4A, Z &#xa3; z/Equipment Description P1I9E el54 F'/e' O/f- 11)0 -4 ' 7,,4 /k Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y/ NEI UCI N/Al]Y;9 N] UEC N/AC Y0 N i] U0 N/AC YJNO NCU Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;K No U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NVO AlE Evaluated by: 7767-04 v 1`01P/fRS Z~- Fr n-k Date: t5,2< C-4>PAGE 244 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I1 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 9 I PAGE 245 of 433 qACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20&deg; I Uro__ _ __ _ __ _ _PAGE 246 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: c) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. A- 6; d' Equip. Class" e -., ,W V Equipment Description AJ $CT -)5c /)C'V'Location:
Bldg. .(. T Floor El. 06 Room, Area 9 40C2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) r.s 4 C-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NUj of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
/Y[I NO UO N/A-UD N/AD Y@/?ND UM N/AD YO NEI UD N/A,//YLVND UM 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,<KC-3 >PAGE 247 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.
a2-C -J446 Equip. Class'2 7- T .- ..C. 6 i vlN ,, Equipment Description IV5 CT 13 t c A1 I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIN- UD N/AD YM//N" U" N/AD YWNO- Ur N/AD Y06/ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YMS'Nn U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
N/i. p_ V<Evaluated by: F Y" Date: "" ' &#xfd;C" 4 C4 >PAGE 248 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 249 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 A or PAGE 250 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No. 2 -'-S -'0 6/ Equip. Class'2 fXe Equipment Description kIa A N'M/ A Fi Q Th I-LA,-Z-X.z,0J V-44'VL: Location:
Bldg. A 0, Floor El. I I '-3 I Room, Area 1 D /13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 54,4 TOA/Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraize
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YDE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
S,7 y 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YK NE UE- N/AE Yto'NE U- N/A0 Y1NE1 UE- NIAE YE: NEI UEr N/Ak YVrNED U0 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< PAGE 251 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -Fr5- o Equip. Class'_(01, Equipment Description RAI', iPOAVA T ,o2 to /AevijAZ.o V.-Lt/I Interaction Effects 7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UQ N/AD Y NO UF] N/AQ Y NEI U- N/A-YW"N- U-Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could '"NO U'-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).I Evaluated by: W.. W I mA Date: .L l 29 7~oI?< C-4 >PAGE 252 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2P A-(205)0 PAGE 253 of 433
*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 254 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 4 -Psj -lt -t 5 Equip. Class" 2 I2- In4taoue.,. (a.cis Equipment Description "LJ,,ht StlJ,., St.rh Cpft4r.l ,I rdhw, Location:
Bldg. C 4rgl Floor El. 190L-0" Room, Area IL&. PO p Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YE NX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yg NEI UE N/AO Y[J NEI UE N/AFE YUQ NE UE N/AE[YE NE UE N/As YW NEI UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
-( C-3 )&#xfd;PAGE 255 OF 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.
2--F5L-I2.05 Equip. Class" 2 19-n.ni EquipmentDescription E,.lv..Iock Flo,. Sk.mih CoA4taiJ fu;lcii, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIN NEI UE- N/AC YEN NEI UC] N/AO YfM NOI UtC N/A YI N[I- UM Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[O NCI UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) okN.Vj : 0401 .oec ; o-1q-53-10y 4"or 5 LC.No~e 02.: Thi5 -tvC w,, ot#a*4 n
~...Evaluated by: S/e/..-- P" S"s. 1#. 2, Date: 6/_______
_3 ( ,I /< C-4 0 PAGE 256 OF 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V PAGE 257 of 433
*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.1110 PAGE 258 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-- FiT- O/3p Equip. Class 1 2_f &#xfd; -[&#xfd;'5 &#xfd;/";Wl ell ( 94k TPnlimnmpnt f"pe~erintinn Cc? 4 PIoi~J Location:
Bldg. 4 X FloorEl. I4J"" Room, Area 4. C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 13."Iy" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y6 NE UE] N/AE]Y-j- U-- N/AE]UE] N/AE]YE] NE] UE] N/ADY Y~4 E]-NE UE]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 )PAGE 259 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z -FT-- I6P Equip. Class'2 I Y /l f X. ( kr Equipment Descrintion C-CP '4 -O Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YONCUIOU N/A[C Y NEj U- N/ADU['] N/A-Yg`NUEC Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NC UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
&#xfd;5 ---Wq2 l u4dt (IA rofZ C Evaluated by Date: C' 5/'/f J/ 2< C-4>PAGE 260 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS It ". t inU NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 PAGE 261 of 433 9 A!ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONID 2,0 PAGE 262 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -T O 1 Equip. Class 1 2_a( 1145TR41MC-Afr R-44jtS)Eouinment Description r-HP, A F-&#xfd;01'j Location:
Bldg. ,=U4 FloorEl. /12 -Room, Area RlD 11.3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y&#xfd;'NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage frec of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
CYS -DPMRO17 jv&#xfd;Lo Cx 5-IP P O)9J VI r.3.o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YX'NE UE- N/AE-Y4dNEI UI- N/AE]YVJNO U- N/A-YiNEI U0 N/A[Y/&#xfd;`NEI U13 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 263 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-' FT -0/o 6 $ Equip. Class 1 2_Equipment Description 4/-h& A- raeko Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y'1 N[" U0 N/AC-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UC N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NC:] U'I N/AC-Y('N[- UC Otber Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NCI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: _ #V I k, l'. 1 Date: 0L2-.-< C-4 >-PAGE 264 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P PAGE 265 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 266 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-FT- -L quip. Class" Equipment Description 5i P /I F.10,, Location:
Bldg. kJ,_) Floor El. j 3o Roo.m, Area /A- //. /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
& 0Aa.o'A,-/"l
//4 d,,41." Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N211 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
NoT /AS, -5o7.YX NE UE3 N/AE Y% NEI UE- N/AE Y5 NE- UE- N/AE-YEI NEI UE- N/A["/6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I.EL,, AT fT'P" T"/"7 YX4 NEIUE],#7 t,"Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >, PAGE 267 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -F' 7" -o 0/Q & Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description Sift 0 '4Lrtto Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI UD N/AD YK NDI UD N/AD YK NDI U[] N/ADND UD Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: ,Fritnk Ytic rl~/91 /Date: bL/y-lzW1P V~~:-y A~" ~ (PAGE 268 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 269 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (b , U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FT- 1T Equip. Class 1 -( Zrwj & Equipment Description
.(.W F io0 TTrcsN4+-t1
-A Location:
Bldg. A'0K Floor El. 19_" Room, Area ______Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YK'N'of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
CK ppyP M027 s ,er. 9.0 To0 1 I, ,6,,l~(kol MG 9, vtr, 3.O 30YVM Lac',4 Y 'NEI UC1 N/A-1 Y&#xfd;'ND U0 N/AC YWN- U0 N/A-Y4NEI UEJ N/A--YK NEIUC 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 270 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic-Walkdown Checklist (SWCj .Equipment ID No. FT- I37 Equip.Class 1 2 Equipment Description (l(. FIoy Trant ,1r, -T ,i tA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by neoby equipmentor structures?
YWNC UC] N/AC].Areov eq C i 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NCI UC] N/AC YA/N"] UC] N/AC]Y NO] UC Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could yA NC U"]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-FOIL A. & WjA-t5-Yg CW 1r)
* 5 '--0if'-01qoA.
"/&#xfd;' /M'A'j W1,111 (%got\Evaluated by a~74 i-'O/~o~~9,q$Ay Date: ' -1< C-4 >PAGE 271 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.lq PAGE 272 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 273 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. 'T-SV Equip. Class'2  19 (L,$ste, /0k(d 5)Eauioment Descriotion A"J(X FI o 1 J NOW 'O 5,6e .Go I -FNovi r 4 onas(/r Location:
Bldg. AI]X Floor El. 119" Room, Area P 10Z Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
?WtMdIt+A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraue I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Y1INc 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
k0A I' V 5O' so > ,l .6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y4NEI U0] N/AE-4 NEI U[[ N/AE3 4 NE[1 UII N/AI]YEI NEI UE[ N/A*YNE] UE3 12 Enter tlhe equipment viass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 274 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K- 5"5- Equip. Class'Equipment Description
/Ak/b r-W F 0 1v 5Ih4,1 Gen. L -. Tirmahre " Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YK NEI U[:] N/AD 8. Aresovehaf qimndsrbtotyses eln ie n ihig 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV NDI UD' N/ADl YV NDI UD' N/AD Y4 ND:] UD]Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NO COYA"jf Evaluated by:4~ 1~I1Ak~~ik~~'
Date:&#xfd;3 &#xfd;.oij&#xfd;<C-4 >" PAGE 275 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 276 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 277 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 FV 06 10 Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description Kk?~ P'~OW A /1i4,lcA oi0 le Location:
Bldg. , V-kQ FloorEl. /L-9I1; Room, Area OE-C P.s Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NV of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YEI NE] UE] N/Ao YE] NEI UE N/AO YEI NEI UE] N/A2 "//YE] NEI UE] N/Am&#xfd;-&#xfd;Y NE] UF'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
<C-3 >PAGE 278 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I- r-V a 10 : Equip. Class'3-Pniuinmen t fl,'egcrrntinn It/tg. P 4P A A4tjr-f H', 1.." P-11inment Descrintion Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZINEIU0 N/AO Y ffN &#xfd;U EIN/AE3 YDN0 ON/E Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y2[' ] IUE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
S~~~O /ar-~eq4 h2 Evaluated by: ~ ~ 4 p % {j/01 Date: 0, 1- t7/ f< C-4 >-PAGE 279 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V PAGE 280 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 281 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-RV- OIqO Equip.Class'__
Equipment Description Ccf, A Gn, k chaQ;ng Soeho,'j of Va.vt Location:
Bldg. PI)( FloorEl..
IqS Room,Area RA'W03 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
A',d c Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE] NE] UE] N/AE:T&#xfd;YE] NE] UE] N/A <" YE] NEI UE] YE] NEI UE]YO-E 4 UE]Enter the equipmenl class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
<C-3>PAGE 282 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .2 liv-0 t9O P Equip. Class'2" Equipment Description -CC-P A- Scfe~f G(V-oi 506~f 0;j, Ofp \oVaC.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ"N- UO N/AC Y[&#xfd;NEI UC N/AO YO/N[ UE- N/AC Y/N rU-Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO/NC UC1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Oo~~~p ('%Loo .51w ivn rlwf weta (e5elv[A m~omjrv+ o&#xfd;4 15CGIWI~ L7' or&#xfd;O foa- a, S6zc conc f1.5e 2-H4V-315"2 4rc &%-C.Evaluated by: Date: -e t-i/7 4 1 /2.PAGE 283 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V---S *p~4 , ~S PAGE 284 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-4V '-/2 'i'S" Equip. Class 1 2 0 "p&#xfd;e~" Equipment Description eF-hi A Aj , L 1 -'Location:
Bldg4-/ -re-_ -Floor El. 2-141 Room, Area _/ 02...Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
L , Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[']  of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
I C a-f-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YEr NEI UE] N/A93'YO NO UE N/AIF'YE NE UIE N/Ag'YE NE UE N/Az/Y[/N- UM 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equiipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 285 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- I14V -/ ?-Oc S'" Equip. Class'2 0 A L Equipment Description 11-T) &T kiaj e e-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/AD Yj"/ND UD N/AD Y[2"NO U- N/AD Y[!R/NO U-Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y D/N[- U"i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
V , " 4& IV-o Evaluated by:. -&#xfd; Clyjc. F-,k Date: of/Ll,/4 PAGE 286 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.ll&#xfd;PAGE 287 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status.: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-G Equip. Class 2  Equipment Description G- &#xfd; " Orz-&#xfd;-t=..
_ 'x-y oac- &#xfd;- O Location:
Bldg. SU. 3 FloorEl. 27-.' RoomArea (Z (z S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO  of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
K 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
A NE U' N/A".NO UE N/AA 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE-- N/Aj 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NEI UO N/AX It NE UE 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 288 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.
--7 Equip. Class' 0(0 ,kr)Equipment Description " o _ Ac M )Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y NEI UFI N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI Ul" N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
X 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NO" Ul- N/AONO- UO-Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y&#xfd;Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
< C-4 >PAGE 289 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION q2 PAGE 290 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- I+V 1300SA Equip. Class0 2 7 Equipment Description KWo.4 5V 8y&#xfd;az V-5G I Location:
Bldg. AVX Floor El. __-0_ 1 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO N&#xfd;2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
L19- UMED VtAl , Y- NEI U- N/Ax YO NEI U[- N/A;YO NEI U- N/Ar YO NO UC N/Av YVN- UC 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >PAGE 291 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ED No. 2- N+V- 13005-A Equip. Classu Equipment Description L4'hOG( (515V &#xfd;yms '40 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[) NEI UQ N/AM Yq NLE U- N/AQl Ye NE U- N/A-YodND U-Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y!VNEI LT Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
N~ONE.Evaluated by: r~,"16~ irki Date: , 3'!201 913 /Zo/Z< C-4 >PAGE 292 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 293 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 294 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y (N, U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. -/T(q6 Equip. Class t 2 l ( (Ml 1i /.Equipment Description 4Fv t/ r,79 S6-Location:
Bldg. 4&"-SAeCV Floor El. (qf_____f Room, Area <A"/.7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
/AA(_, ]mf/O //,/A1LAAJg,-
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO Nrix 7 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete nea- the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE NEI UF N/A YE- NE UE- N/Ae YO NE UE N/1A YO NE U[:E N/Az Y% NFE U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
< C-3 >-PAGE 295 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.
2 --It- 1(-q1 1 Equip. CIassU ;(Mb, /4 -,hJ'AJ O,-/,J -Equipment Description 6 FY l/ F-OA" S(' I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NX UOI N/AD,,-,4- ,. * .>". (':A0 5-ozqq3), 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N- Uti- N/AD-and masonry block waUs not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI)(N- U[ N/A-V&sect;NO U'Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y&#xfd; ND Ut'l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)_-I14 -1/- 5z- Z 7 Evaluated by: KC e Date: '5 2x< C4 >" PAGE 296 of 433 9 AAACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 297 of 433 A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 298 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION 9 PAGE 299 of 433}}

Revision as of 18:07, 28 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_6_of_14&oldid=1540858"