ML18114A174: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[L-78-177, Response to Letter of 5/8/1978 Requesting Certain Information to Complete Review of Application to Restart St. Lucie Unit 1 Following Refueling. FP&L Will Provide Schedule to Responses by 6/8/1978]]
| number = ML18114A174
| issue date = 05/19/1978
| title = St. Lucie Unit 1 - Response to Letter of 5/8/1978 Requesting Certain Information to Complete Review of Application to Restart St. Lucie Unit 1 Following Refueling. FP&L Will Provide Schedule to Responses by 6/8/1978
| author name = Uhrig R E
| author affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| addressee name = Reid R W
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000335
| license number = DPR-067
| contact person =
| case reference number = L-78-177
| document type = Letter, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| page count = 4
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS>MS1'RI8UTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-335 EC: REID R W ORG: UHRIG R E NRC FL PNR 8.LIGHT DOCDATE: 05/19/78 DATE RCVD: 05/24/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED:
NO COPIES RECEIVED
 
==SUBJECT:==
LTR 3 ENCL 0 RESPONSE TO NRC REQUEST OF 05/08/78...
FURNISHING INFO CONERNING APPLICANT" S APPL TO RESTART SUBJECT FACILITY FOLLOWING REFUELING>
RE PROPOSED CONSERVATIVE TECH SPECS WITH RESPECT TO TOTAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR (FXYT)AND TOTAL INTERGRATED RADIAL P PLANT NAME: ST LUCIE Ni REVIEWER INIT 1 AL: X JM DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL: QQ DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS++++<<~4+<+<++4+++
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION FOR AFTER lSSUANCE OF OPERATING LICENSE.(DISTRIBUTION CODE A001>FOR ACTION: INTERNAL: EXTERNAL: BR CHIEF REID4~LTR ONLY(7>RFG FII E+~lLTR ONLY(2)HANAUER+4LTR ONLY(i>EISENHUT4+LTR ONLY(1)BAER+~~LTR ONLY(i)EEB+4LTR ONLY(1)J.MCCOUGH~~LTR ONLY(1>LPDR S FT PIERCE, FL~4LTR ONLY(1)TIC++LTR ONLY(1>NSIC~~LTR ONLY(1)ACRS CAT 8++LTR ONLY(ib>NRC PDR4~+LTR ONLY(i>OELD+<LTR ONLY<i)CHECK+4LTR ONLY(i>SHAO+4LTR ONLY(i)BUTLER++LTR ONLY(i>J COLLINS+4LTR ONLY(i)DISTRIBUTION:
LTR 40 ENCL 0 SIZE: 2P%%.f 4%%0l%4%%%%%%%%%%W%%%4
%0l%%%%%%%%%THE END CONTROL NBR: 781450099 4~V y4>I//g~6~//Alii i>'l FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY May 19, 1978 L-78-177 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr.Robert W.Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.4 Division of Operating Reactors U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
 
==Dear Mr.Reid:==
Re: St.Lucie Unit No.1, Docket No.50-335 Your letter of May 8, 1978, requested certain information to complete your review of our application to restart St.Lucie Unit No.1 follow-ing refueling.
Your letter further stated that since resolution of your concerns prior to our planned restart of Unit No.1 was doubtful, we should propose conservative Technical Specifications with respect to Total Planar Radial Peaking Factor (FxyT)and Total Integrated Radial Peaking Factor (Fr)-We have reviewed your suggestion that we resubmit Figure.3.2-3 with FxyT based on a 9.8%uncertainty factor arid FrT based on a 7.8%un-certainty factor and have'determined that these uncertainties are presently incorporated in Figure 3.2-3 as submitted in our application of March 22, 1978.The Fr values related to the DNB LSSS and LCO proposed for Technical Specifications for St.Lucie Unit 51 Cycle 2-are based on a physics uncertainty of 5.1 percent.In addition, the FrT values are augmented by an additional penalty of 4.6 percent to cover the water hole peaks as discussed in the licensing submittal.
This implies a total penalty of F of 9.7 percent.Likewise, the FxyT values related to the peak linear heat rate LSSS and LCO include a 5.8 percent physics uncertainty, plus the 4.6 percent water hole peaking factor, which implies a total penalty of 10.4 percent.Based on these allowances (9.7 percent for Fr and 10.4 percent for T Fxv), the present proposed Technical Specifications, i.e., 3.2.2, 3.2.3, anct Figure 3.2-3, already include uncertainty factors sufficient to address the concerns noted in your letter of May 8.Data to be used in monitoring integrated and planar radial peaking factors from in-core detector measurements will include an incremental adjustment factor of 4.6 percent to explicitly account for water hole peaking.effect's..This will provide appropriately adjusted peaking factors to compare to the pioposed limits.Therefore, there is no need to revise Figure 3.2-3.7aissooo9>ID PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE Mr.Reid May 19, 1978 Pag.e"Two Members of your staff have expressed agreement with this determination in discussions on this matter.Accordingly, it is our understanding that a revised Figure 3.2-3 is unnecessary.
With regard to the information requested in your letter, we propose to provide you a schedule for furnishing our response to the questions contained in Enclosures 1, 2, and 3 by June 8, 1978.Yours very truly, Robert E.Uhrig r Vice President REU:LLL:lc cc: Peter B.Erickson James P.O'Rei13.y, Region XI Harold F.Reis, Esquire}}

Latest revision as of 10:26, 5 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18114A174&oldid=1401546"