L-2014-292, LER 14-004-00 for Turkey Point, Unit 3 Regarding Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit Exceeded Due to Environmental Conditions: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[05000250/LER-2014-004]]
| number = ML14280A484
| issue date = 09/18/2014
| title = LER 14-004-00 for Turkey Point, Unit 3 Regarding Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit Exceeded Due to Environmental Conditions
| author name = Kiley M
| author affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = L-2014-292
| document report number = LER 14-004-00
| document type = Letter, Licensee Event Report (LER)
| page count = 4
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0 PPL.L-2014-292 10 CFR § 50.73 September 18, 2014 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Reportable Event: 2014-004-00 Dates of Event: July 20, 26, 27, 28 and August 7, 2014 Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit Exceeded Due to Environmental Conditions The attached Licensee Event Report 05000250/2014-004-00 is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), any event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to remove residual heat.If there are any questions, please call Mr. Robert Tomonto at 305-246-7327.
Very truly yours, Michael Kiley Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, USNRC, Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power & Light Company 9760 SW 344' St., Florida City, FL 33035 NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 0113112017 (02-2014)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80hours., Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Prvacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
or by~:'IedJLICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) intemetl e-mail to lnfocollects-Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and..(Se Pag 2 for require number of Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC ee rPage 2 o rrequire u m 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB digits/characters for each block) control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not requiredto respond to, the information collection.
: 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET NUMBER 3. PAGE Turkey Point Unit 3 05000250 1 of 3 4. TITLE Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit Exceeded Due to Environmental Conditions
: 5. EVENT DATE 6. LER NUMBER 7. REPORT DATE 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED SEQUENTIAL Rev FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR 0 MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NO. Turkey Point Unit 4 05000251 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 7 20 2014 2014 -004-- 00 9 18 2014 05000 9. OPERATING MODE 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply)El 20.2201(b)
El 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)
W 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
Ej 20.2201(d)
[ 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
[I 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
E] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 1 20.2203(a)(1)
W 20.2203(a)(4)
[1 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
[] 20.2203(a)(2)(i)
D 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
E] 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
: 10. POWER LEVEL [ 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)
El 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A)
.] 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(x)
E] 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
Z 50.36(c)(2)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)
E] 73.71 (a)(4)1 % 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
D 50.46(a)(3)(ii)
[ 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)
[D 73.71 (a)(5)1 % 20.2203(a)(2)(v)
D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)
E] OTHER.50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)
Specify in Abstract below or in LI 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 5B 5DA NRC Form 366A 12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER FACILITY NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)Paul F. Czaya 305-246-7150
: 13. COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THS REPORT CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU- REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU- REPORTABLE FACTURER TO EPIX FACTURER TO EPIX 14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSSION YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE) X NO DATE Ai1AUT (Limit to 7400 spaces i.e, approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines)On July 20, 26, 27, 28 and August 7, 2014, Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 entered and exited the Action for Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.4, Ultimate Heat Sink, once each day for periods of up to 8 hours because the 100 degree F limit for ultimate heat sink (UHS) temperature was exceeded.
The 12 hour requirement to be in Hot Standby was not exceeded during these events and so there was no condition prohibited by the TS.On July 20, 2014, the NRC granted enforcement discretion (NOED No. 14-2-001) to allow the Turkey Point units to continue operation with UHS temperature up to 103 degrees F provided certain compensatory measures were implemented and termination criteria were met. License amendments were issued by the NRC on August 8, 2014, which increased the UHS temperature limit to 104 degrees F and terminated the NOED. Environmental conditions outside of management control negatively impacted UHS water quality (primarily an algae bloom) and the ability of the cooling canal system (CCS) to dissipate the heat rejected by plant operation.
Corrective actions include biocide treatment of the CCS water, revision of the UHS temperature limit to 104 degrees F, and enhancement and integration of existing activities to improve the monitoring of CCS capability to accomodate normal and accident plant heat loads. There were no safety consequences to plant or public safety as a result of these events.
NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 01131/2017 (02-2014)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours.Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch(T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) intemet e-mail to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, CONTINUATION SHEET Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
: 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET 6. LER NUMER 3. PAGE SEQUENTIAL REV YER NUMBER NO. 2 O Turkey Point Unit 3 05000250 2 of 2014 -004 -00 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENT On July 20, 2014 at approximately 1454 hours, with both Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 in Mode I and at 100%power, the Action for Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.4, Ultimate Heat Sink, was entered which requires both units to be placed in Hot Standby within 12 hours and Cold Shutdown within the following 30 hours.The TS Action was entered because ultimate heat sink (UHS) [BS] temperature exceeded the TS limit of 100 degrees F. The TS Action was exited at approximately 2046 the same day when UHS temperature decreased below 100 degrees F. Units 3 and 4 were in the TS Action for a period of approximately 5 hours and 52 minutes. Subsequently, on July 26, 27, 28 and August 7, 2014, both Turkey Point units entered and exited the Action for TS 3.7.4 once each day for periods of up to 8 hours. The 12 hour requirement to be in Hot Standby was not exceeded during these events and so there was no condition prohibited by the TS.The events were reported to the NRC via Event Notification 50287 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B) because UHS capability to remove residual heat was impacted.
This report is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) for the same reason.At 1800 hours on July 20, 2014, the NRC granted enforcement discretion (NOED No. 14-2-001) to allow the Turkey Point units to continue operation with a UHS temperature of up to 103 degrees F provided certain compensatory measures were implemented and termination criteria were met. On August 8, 2014, the NRC issued License Amendments 261 and 256 for Turkey Point-Units 3 and 4, respectively, which raised the UHS temperature limit to 104 degrees F and terminated the need for enforcement discretion.
CAUSE OF THE EVENT Environmental conditions outside of management control negatively impacted UHS water quality and the ability of the cooling canal system (CCS) to dissipate the heat rejected by plant operation.
A cause evaluation identified that existing monitoring activities should be enhanced-and integrated to improve the monitoring of CCS capability to accomodate normal and accident plant heat loads.BACKGROUND INFORMATION Turkey Point Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 use a closed system of cooling canals to support operation of the power plants. For nuclear units 3 and 4, the CCS provides the coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) [KE] system and the UHS for the Intake Cooling Water (ICW) [BS] system. The CW system provides cooling water to the main plant condensers.
The ICW system removes heat loads from the Component Cooling Water [CC]system during normal and accident conditions to support both reactor [AC, RCT] and containment
[NH] heat removal requirements, and spent fuel cooling [DA] requirements.
In June 2014, UHS temperatures approached the TS 3.7.4 limit of 100 degrees F. Engineering and environmental analysis determined that the CCS water was absorbing unusual amounts of solar energy due to NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 01131/2017 (02-2014)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours.Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by-,, ('v, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) intemet e-mail to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, CONTINUATION SHEET Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
: 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET 6. LER NUMER 3. PAGE SEQUENTIAL REV YER NUMBER NO. 3 o Turkey Point Unit 3 05000250 of 2014 -004 -00 the presence of higher than normal algae content. A controlled chemical treatment of the canal system was initiated to gradually restore the normal algae content and improve heat transfer efficiency, without adversely affecting plant and wildlife in the canal system.On July 10, 2014, an application for license amendments to allow plant operation with UHS temperatures less than or equal to 104 degrees F was submitted for NRC review and approval.ANALYSIS OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE There was no increase in risk due to allowing the average water temperature of the UHS to increase from 100 degrees F to 103 degrees F during the period of enforcement discretion.
The analysis performed for the license amendment application determined that an increase in UHS temperature to 104 degrees F had either no impact or an insignificant impact on the loss of coolant accident (LOCA) and non-LOCA results.Additionally, component assessments were performed and determined that components served by the UHS would continue to perform satisfactorily with an increase in UHS temperature to 104 degrees F. Noadverse influences on risk were identified through examination of the probabilistic risk analysis model for the plant.Additionally, despite the hot weather conditions during the period of enforcement discretion (7/20/14 to 8/7/14), the average water temperature of the UHS exceeded the 100 degree F limit for only about 30 hours total.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Corrective actions include: 0 Increase in UHS temperature limit to 104 degrees F (Amendments 261 and 256 issued by the NRC on 8/8/14).* Biocide treatment of the CCS water.* Enhance and integrate existing monitoring activities to improve the monitoring of CCS capability to accomodate normal and accident plant heat loads.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EIIS Codes are shown in the format [IEEE system identifier, component function identifier, second component function identifier (if appropriate)].
Condition Report 1979256 was initiated due to this event.FAILED COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED:
None.PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS: None.}}

Latest revision as of 23:22, 21 January 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=L-2014-292,_LER_14-004-00_for_Turkey_Point,_Unit_3_Regarding_Ultimate_Heat_Sink_Temperature_Limit_Exceeded_Due_to_Environmental_Conditions&oldid=1216597"