NRC Generic Letter 1981-32: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:I 4f nAugust 7, 1981 f2 AUG 17l9810_TO ALL APPLICANTS/LICENSEES REFERENCING BWR OWNERS GROUP RESP t 74-ITEM II.K.3.44Gentlemen:SUBJECT: NUREG-0737, ITEM II.K.3.44-EVALUATION OF ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTSCOMBINED WITH SINGLE FAILURE (Generic Letter No. 81-32)The staff has completed its review of the General Electric BWR Owner Groupreport dated December 29, 1980 pertaining to the subject NUREG-0737 item.This report was prepared for the participating applicants/licensees identi-fied in the enclosure.This is to advise you that we have found the response contained in thisreport to be acceptable on a generic basis. However, in order to confirmthe applicability of this report to your facility we request that you pro-vide verification that the assumptions and initial conditions used in theanalyses are representative for your plant(s). Licensees and applicantsare to provide this information according to the following schedule:a. Licensees of operating plants within 90 days of receipt of thisletter,b. Applicants for operating licenses within 90 days of receipt ofthis letter andc. The remaining participating utilities within 30 days of docketingof the FSAR.If the conditions and assumptions used in the analyses are not representative,the licensee should identify the major design differences between the plantanaly~ed and the licensee's plant. A qualitative assessment of the effectthese differences have on the analyses can be offered by the licensee; however,if this assessment lacks technical support, a schedule for providing plantspecific analyses will be required. For applicants for operating licensesthe completion dates for any required analyses should be consistent withyour review schedule.The above information is requested in accordance with Sections 103.b(3) and161.c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The request for informa"tion was approved by OMB under clearance number 3150-0065 which expiresJune 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to theOffice of Management and Budget, Reports Management, Room 3208, New ExecutiveOffice Building, Washington, 0. C.-t Mr. B. Siegel has been assigned the lead on Action Plan Item II.K.3.44.Should you have any questions regarding this request please feel free tot E JwOFFICEO--------,I , ,p.1pSUNME DR28c74eo*-----------............. ............. -..I..................... ..................... ..................... ...................... ....................SURNAME4....8108240477 910807PDR ADOCK 09 +04W O .....................................................DATE P PDR..................I............. ,,........I............. ............ ..................... ................ ..... ............... .....I.......... ................___ _.___ _._NRC FORM 318 410/80) NRCM 0240OFFICIAL RECORD COPY* USGPO: 1980-329-824  
{{#Wiki_filter:I 4f n August 7, 1981 f2 AUG 17l9810_TO ALL APPLICANTS/LICENSEES  
*1At;To ALL Applicants/Licensees ReferencingBWR Owners Group Response to HLREG-0737 Item II.K.3.44_ 2 .contact him at (301) 492,4909.Your time and efforts are appreciated.Sincerely,Original signed byDarrell G. ElselxlDarrell G. Eisenhut, DirectorDivision of LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationEnclosure:Listing of Applicants/Licenseescc w/enclosure:Service ListsDistribution:Docket File (1)NRC PDR (1)L PDR (1)TERA (1)NSIC (1)DL ADs (3)ORBCs (5)LB BCs (1 ea)ORB PMs (lea)ORAB (1)SEPB (1)ORB LAs (6)OELD (5)IE (7)JWetmoreCHarwoodR. DiggsPWooleyGray Files (1 ea.)ACRS (10)DEisenhutPCheckAII ....B i 7f8.... 7ft-1 .......'..O.RS:DLTIppol ito*T 7IPofii.....AB:OR:DL'ITNovak*-7/^^-fa.............................*7 $ f81-----RTA ..o7-AW P .-----*7-f , 4 ............ /...NRC FORM 318 NRCM 8240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1980-329-824NRC FORM 318 110/80) NRCM G240O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OP Y., USGPO: 1980-329-824  
REFERENCING  
~A --PkEnclosureAPPLICANTS/LICENSEES PARTICIPATING IN BWR OWNERS GROUPGENERAL RESPONSE TO NUREG-0737, II.K.3.44Boston EdisonCarolina Power & LightCommonwealth EdisonGeorgia PowerIowa Electric Light & PowerJersey Central Power & LightNiagara Mohawk PowerNebraska Public Power DistrictNortheast UtilitiesPhiladelphia ElectricPower Authority of the State of New YorkTennessee Valley AuthorityVermont Yankee Nuclear PowerDetroit EdisonMississippi Power & LightPennsylvania Power & LightWashington Public Power Supply SystemCleveland Electric IlluminatingHouston Lighting & PowerIllinois PowerPublic Service of OklahomaLong Island LightingNorthern States PowerPilgrim 1Brunswick 1 & 2LaSalle 1 & 2, Dresden 1-3,Quad Cities 1 & 2Hatch 1 & 2Duane ArnoldOyster Creek 1Nine Mile Point 1 & 2CooperMillstone 1Peach Bottom 2 & 3, Limerick 1 & 2FitzPatrickBrowns Ferry 1-3, Hartsville 1-4,Phipps Bend 1 & 2Vermont YankeeEnrico Fermi 2Grand Gulf 1 & 2Susquehanna 1 & 2Hanford 2Perry 1 & 2Allens CreekClinton Station 1 & 2Black Fox 1 & 2ShorehamMonticello
BWR OWNERS GROUP RESP t 74-ITEM II.K.3.44 Gentlemen:
}}
SUBJECT: NUREG-0737, ITEM II.K.3.44-EVALUATION  
OF ANTICIPATED  
TRANSIENTS
COMBINED WITH SINGLE FAILURE (Generic Letter No. 81-32)The staff has completed its review of the General Electric BWR Owner Group report dated December 29, 1980 pertaining to the subject NUREG-0737 item.This report was prepared for the participating applicants/licensees identi-fied in the enclosure.
 
This is to advise you that we have found the response contained in this report to be acceptable on a generic basis. However, in order to confirm the applicability of this report to your facility we request that you pro-vide verification that the assumptions and initial conditions used in the analyses are representative for your plant(s).  
Licensees and applicants are to provide this information according to the following schedule: a. Licensees of operating plants within 90 days of receipt of this letter, b. Applicants for operating licenses within 90 days of receipt of this letter and c. The remaining participating utilities within 30 days of docketing of the FSAR.If the conditions and assumptions used in the analyses are not representative, the licensee should identify the major design differences between the plant analy~ed and the licensee's plant. A qualitative assessment of the effect these differences have on the analyses can be offered by the licensee;  
however, if this assessment lacks technical support, a schedule for providing plant specific analyses will be required.
 
For applicants for operating licenses the completion dates for any required analyses should be consistent with your review schedule.The above information is requested in accordance with Sections 103.b(3) and 161.c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The request for informa" tion was approved by OMB under clearance number 3150-0065 which expires June 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Reports Management, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, 0. C.-t Mr. B. Siegel has been assigned the lead on Action Plan Item II.K.3.44.
 
Should you have any questions regarding this request please feel free to t E Jw OFFICEO--------,I , ,p.1p SUNME DR28c74eo*-----------.............  
.............  
-..I.....................  
.....................  
.....................  
......................  
....................
SURNAME4....8108240477  
910807 PDR ADOCK 09 +04W O .....................................................
DATE P PDR..................
I.............  
,,........I.............  
............  
.....................  
................  
..... ...............  
.....I..........  
...............
.___ _.___ _._NRC FORM 318 410/80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY* USGPO: 1980-329-824  
*1 At;To ALL Applicants/Licensees Referencing BWR Owners Group Response to HLREG-0737 Item II.K.3.44_ 2 .contact him at (301) 492,4909.Your time and efforts are appreciated.
 
Sincerely, Original signed by Darrell G. Elselxl Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
Listing of Applicants/
Licensees cc w/enclosure:
Service Lists Distribution:
Docket File (1)NRC PDR (1)L PDR (1)TERA (1)NSIC (1)DL ADs (3)ORBCs (5)LB BCs (1 ea)ORB PMs (lea)ORAB (1)SEPB (1)ORB LAs (6)OELD (5)IE (7)JWetmore CHarwood R. Diggs PWooley Gray Files (1 ea.)ACRS (10)DEisenhut PCheck A II ....B i 7f8.... 7ft-1 .......'..O.RS:DL
TIppol ito*T 7IPofii.....
AB:OR:DL'I
TNovak*-7/^^-fa........
.....................
*7 $ f81-----RTA ..o 7-AW P .-----*7-f , 4 ............ /...NRC FORM 318 NRCM 8240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1980-329-824 NRC FORM 318 110/80) NRCM G240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OP Y., USGPO: 1980-329-824  
~A --P k Enclosure APPLICANTS/LICENSEES  
PARTICIPATING  
IN BWR OWNERS GROUP GENERAL RESPONSE TO NUREG-0737, II.K.3.44 Boston Edison Carolina Power & Light Commonwealth Edison Georgia Power Iowa Electric Light & Power Jersey Central Power & Light Niagara Mohawk Power Nebraska Public Power District Northeast Utilities Philadelphia Electric Power Authority of the State of New York Tennessee Valley Authority Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Detroit Edison Mississippi Power & Light Pennsylvania Power & Light Washington Public Power Supply System Cleveland Electric Illuminating Houston Lighting & Power Illinois Power Public Service of Oklahoma Long Island Lighting Northern States Power Pilgrim 1 Brunswick
1 & 2 LaSalle 1 & 2, Dresden 1-3, Quad Cities 1 & 2 Hatch 1 & 2 Duane Arnold Oyster Creek 1 Nine Mile Point 1 & 2 Cooper Millstone
1 Peach Bottom 2 & 3, Limerick 1 & 2 FitzPatrick Browns Ferry 1-3, Hartsville  
1-4, Phipps Bend 1 & 2 Vermont Yankee Enrico Fermi 2 Grand Gulf 1 & 2 Susquehanna
1 & 2 Hanford 2 Perry 1 & 2 Allens Creek Clinton Station 1 & 2 Black Fox 1 & 2 Shoreham Monticello}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Revision as of 12:49, 31 August 2018

NRC Generic Letter 1981-032: NUREG-0737, Item 11.K.3.44 - Evaluation of Anticipated Transients Combined with Single Failure
ML031110040
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/07/1981
From: Eisenhut D G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-81-032, NUDOCS 8108240477
Download: ML031110040 (3)


I 4f n August 7, 1981 f2 AUG 17l9810_TO ALL APPLICANTS/LICENSEES

REFERENCING

BWR OWNERS GROUP RESP t 74-ITEM II.K.3.44 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NUREG-0737, ITEM II.K.3.44-EVALUATION

OF ANTICIPATED

TRANSIENTS

COMBINED WITH SINGLE FAILURE (Generic Letter No. 81-32)The staff has completed its review of the General Electric BWR Owner Group report dated December 29, 1980 pertaining to the subject NUREG-0737 item.This report was prepared for the participating applicants/licensees identi-fied in the enclosure.

This is to advise you that we have found the response contained in this report to be acceptable on a generic basis. However, in order to confirm the applicability of this report to your facility we request that you pro-vide verification that the assumptions and initial conditions used in the analyses are representative for your plant(s).

Licensees and applicants are to provide this information according to the following schedule: a. Licensees of operating plants within 90 days of receipt of this letter, b. Applicants for operating licenses within 90 days of receipt of this letter and c. The remaining participating utilities within 30 days of docketing of the FSAR.If the conditions and assumptions used in the analyses are not representative, the licensee should identify the major design differences between the plant analy~ed and the licensee's plant. A qualitative assessment of the effect these differences have on the analyses can be offered by the licensee;

however, if this assessment lacks technical support, a schedule for providing plant specific analyses will be required.

For applicants for operating licenses the completion dates for any required analyses should be consistent with your review schedule.The above information is requested in accordance with Sections 103.b(3) and 161.c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The request for informa" tion was approved by OMB under clearance number 3150-0065 which expires June 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Reports Management, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, 0. C.-t Mr. B. Siegel has been assigned the lead on Action Plan Item II.K.3.44.

Should you have any questions regarding this request please feel free to t E Jw OFFICEO--------,I , ,p.1p SUNME DR28c74eo*-----------.............

.............

-..I.....................

.....................

.....................

......................

....................

SURNAME4....8108240477

910807 PDR ADOCK 09 +04W O .....................................................

DATE P PDR..................

I.............

,,........I.............

............

.....................

................

..... ...............

.....I..........

...............

.___ _.___ _._NRC FORM 318 410/80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY* USGPO: 1980-329-824

  • 1 At;To ALL Applicants/Licensees Referencing BWR Owners Group Response to HLREG-0737 Item II.K.3.44_ 2 .contact him at (301) 492,4909.Your time and efforts are appreciated.

Sincerely, Original signed by Darrell G. Elselxl Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

Listing of Applicants/

Licensees cc w/enclosure:

Service Lists Distribution:

Docket File (1)NRC PDR (1)L PDR (1)TERA (1)NSIC (1)DL ADs (3)ORBCs (5)LB BCs (1 ea)ORB PMs (lea)ORAB (1)SEPB (1)ORB LAs (6)OELD (5)IE (7)JWetmore CHarwood R. Diggs PWooley Gray Files (1 ea.)ACRS (10)DEisenhut PCheck A II ....B i 7f8.... 7ft-1 .......'..O.RS:DL

TIppol ito*T 7IPofii.....

AB:OR:DL'I

TNovak*-7/^^-fa........

.....................

  • 7 $ f81-----RTA ..o 7-AW P .-----*7-f , 4 ............ /...NRC FORM 318 NRCM 8240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1980-329-824 NRC FORM 318 110/80) NRCM G240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OP Y., USGPO: 1980-329-824

~A --P k Enclosure APPLICANTS/LICENSEES

PARTICIPATING

IN BWR OWNERS GROUP GENERAL RESPONSE TO NUREG-0737, II.K.3.44 Boston Edison Carolina Power & Light Commonwealth Edison Georgia Power Iowa Electric Light & Power Jersey Central Power & Light Niagara Mohawk Power Nebraska Public Power District Northeast Utilities Philadelphia Electric Power Authority of the State of New York Tennessee Valley Authority Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Detroit Edison Mississippi Power & Light Pennsylvania Power & Light Washington Public Power Supply System Cleveland Electric Illuminating Houston Lighting & Power Illinois Power Public Service of Oklahoma Long Island Lighting Northern States Power Pilgrim 1 Brunswick

1 & 2 LaSalle 1 & 2, Dresden 1-3, Quad Cities 1 & 2 Hatch 1 & 2 Duane Arnold Oyster Creek 1 Nine Mile Point 1 & 2 Cooper Millstone

1 Peach Bottom 2 & 3, Limerick 1 & 2 FitzPatrick Browns Ferry 1-3, Hartsville

1-4, Phipps Bend 1 & 2 Vermont Yankee Enrico Fermi 2 Grand Gulf 1 & 2 Susquehanna

1 & 2 Hanford 2 Perry 1 & 2 Allens Creek Clinton Station 1 & 2 Black Fox 1 & 2 Shoreham Monticello

Template:GL-Nav