ML20199E943: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000254/1998024]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20199E943
| issue date = 01/14/1999
| title = Partially Withheld Security Insp Repts 50-254/98-24 & 50-265/98-24.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities Re Physical Protection of Quad Cities Facility.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
| author name =
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000254, 05000265
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-254-98-24, 50-265-98-24, NUDOCS 9901210141
| package number = ML20199E935
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000254/1998024]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
..
.
-
. - - . . -
.-. .-,
.
.
.
.
_ _ _ - -
-.-. . .
. .
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION 111
Docket Nos:
50-254;50-265
,
l
License Nos:
DPR-29; DPR-30
;
I
I
Report Nos:
50-254/98024(DRS); 50-265/98024(DRS)
l
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)
Facility:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2
Location:
22710 206'" Avenue North
Cordova,IL 61242
l
l
Dates:
December 14-18,1998
l
l
Inspector:
Terry J. Madeda, Physical Security Inspector
l
l
l
Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1
l
Division of Reactor Safety
i
l
i
I
<
Ehclosure Cent
4
i
.
Is Decontrollod
9901210141 990114
PDR
ADOCK 05000254
G
PDR
1
.
.
 
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
.
.
.
s
'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
i
j
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2
NRC Inspection Reports 50-254/98024; 50-265/98024
This inspection reviewed plant support activities relating to the physical protection of the Quad
Cities facility. The report evaluated security activities related to security plan changes, security
2
training and qualifications, security training records, management effectiveness and controls,
audit and self assessment activities, problem analysis and corrective actions, and follow up to
a previous inspection finding.
.
The inspector determined that two security plan changes that were implemented by the
e
licensee since December 1997 did not decrease the effectiveness of the security plan.
(Section S3)
Security training activities were accurately documented and conducted in an
e
appropriate and sound manner. (Section SS)
Licensee audit and self-assessment activities regarding the security program were
e
properly implemented. The licensee's plant wide problem identification and corrective
,
action tracking program was generally effective. However, discrepancies were
identified in the security area regarding the documentation of security equipment
failures. Licensee action was initiated to address this issue. The licensee's security
department's intemal corrective action tracking system was effective. (Section S7)
The inspector identified a violation in which armed response force personnel were
e
routinely assigned fire watch duties that prevented them from immediately responding
to security events. Licensee security management's effectiveness and controls were
not effective in this case because they did not recognize that response capabilities had
been reduced. Effective and timely corrective action was implemented. (Section S8.1)
2
*" O*"
,.
~ c s.
1
e
y g C',% t
')
-
}}

Latest revision as of 03:16, 24 May 2025

Partially Withheld Security Insp Repts 50-254/98-24 & 50-265/98-24.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities Re Physical Protection of Quad Cities Facility.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20199E943
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  
Issue date: 01/14/1999
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20199E935 List:
References
50-254-98-24, 50-265-98-24, NUDOCS 9901210141
Download: ML20199E943 (2)


See also: IR 05000254/1998024

Text

.

..

.

-

. - - . . -

.-. .-,

.

.

.

.

_ _ _ - -

-.-. . .

. .

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION 111

Docket Nos:

50-254;50-265

,

l

License Nos:

DPR-29; DPR-30

I

I

Report Nos:

50-254/98024(DRS); 50-265/98024(DRS)

l

Licensee:

Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed)

Facility:

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2

Location:

22710 206'" Avenue North

Cordova,IL 61242

l

l

Dates:

December 14-18,1998

l

l

Inspector:

Terry J. Madeda, Physical Security Inspector

l

l

l

Approved by:

James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1

l

Division of Reactor Safety

i

l

i

I

<

Ehclosure Cent

4

i

.

Is Decontrollod

9901210141 990114

PDR

ADOCK 05000254

G

PDR

1

.

.

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

.

.

.

s

'

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

i

j

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2

NRC Inspection Reports 50-254/98024; 50-265/98024

This inspection reviewed plant support activities relating to the physical protection of the Quad

Cities facility. The report evaluated security activities related to security plan changes, security

2

training and qualifications, security training records, management effectiveness and controls,

audit and self assessment activities, problem analysis and corrective actions, and follow up to

a previous inspection finding.

.

The inspector determined that two security plan changes that were implemented by the

e

licensee since December 1997 did not decrease the effectiveness of the security plan.

(Section S3)

Security training activities were accurately documented and conducted in an

e

appropriate and sound manner. (Section SS)

Licensee audit and self-assessment activities regarding the security program were

e

properly implemented. The licensee's plant wide problem identification and corrective

,

action tracking program was generally effective. However, discrepancies were

identified in the security area regarding the documentation of security equipment

failures. Licensee action was initiated to address this issue. The licensee's security

department's intemal corrective action tracking system was effective. (Section S7)

The inspector identified a violation in which armed response force personnel were

e

routinely assigned fire watch duties that prevented them from immediately responding

to security events. Licensee security management's effectiveness and controls were

not effective in this case because they did not recognize that response capabilities had

been reduced. Effective and timely corrective action was implemented. (Section S8.1)

2

  • " O*"

,.

~ c s.

1

e

y g C',% t

')

-