ML23088A082: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Industry Perspective on NRC Oversight of PRA Configuration Control NRC Public Meeting March 30, 2023 | {{#Wiki_filter:Industry Perspective on NRC Oversight of PRA Configuration Control NRC Public Meeting March 30, 2023 | ||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute Overview | |||
Guiding | Guiding principles for effort | ||
Key Industry Lessons Learned from Tabletop Inspection Process Overarching theme: clarity and documentation are vital | Industry lessons learned from tabletop evaluations | ||
* Use and definition of various models Model of record Working models Application specific models | |||
Future and ongoing industry actions | |||
Continuing points for future evaluation | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 2 Guiding Principles for PRA Configuration Control Tabletop Inspection Effort | |||
Industry and NRC resource Consistent with allocation existing appropriate for regulations, relative safety Build on previous regulatory guides, impact reviews (licensing and license reviews, peer conditions reviews) | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 3 Key Industry Lessons Learned from Tabletop Inspection Process | |||
Overarching theme: clarity and documentation are vital | |||
* Use and definition of various models | |||
Model of record | |||
Working models | |||
Application specific models | |||
* Process for incorporating new types of equipment/operational procedures (e.g. FLEX, OPC) | * Process for incorporating new types of equipment/operational procedures (e.g. FLEX, OPC) | ||
* Documentation and procedures for engagement with engineering on modification reviews | * Documentation and procedures for engagement with engineering on modification reviews | ||
Industry Actions Moving Forward Internal industry best practices Owners Continued Group report engagement on best with NRC practices High performance in licensee | ©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 4 Industry Actions Moving Forward | ||
Internal industry best practices Owners Continued Group report engagement on best with NRC practices | |||
High performance in licensee P R A | |||
configuration control | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 5 Future Engagement with NRC | |||
Orderly and predictable roll-out Scope of training for NRC regional staff and other staff supporting inspections | |||
* Consistency in interpretations | * Consistency in interpretations | ||
* Delineation between information and operating experience Appropriately sized inspection process | * Delineation between information and operating experience Appropriately sized inspection process | ||
| Line 41: | Line 62: | ||
* Four years conflicts with schedule for application-driven model updates | * Four years conflicts with schedule for application-driven model updates | ||
* Consider lengthening to make best use of NRC and licensee resources | * Consider lengthening to make best use of NRC and licensee resources | ||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 6}} | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 15 November 2024
| ML23088A082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Issue date: | 03/30/2023 |
| From: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| To: | NRC/NRR/DRA/APOB |
| References | |
| Download: ML23088A082 (1) | |
Text
Industry Perspective on NRC Oversight of PRA Configuration Control NRC Public Meeting March 30, 2023
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute Overview
Guiding principles for effort
Industry lessons learned from tabletop evaluations
Future and ongoing industry actions
Continuing points for future evaluation
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 2 Guiding Principles for PRA Configuration Control Tabletop Inspection Effort
Industry and NRC resource Consistent with allocation existing appropriate for regulations, relative safety Build on previous regulatory guides, impact reviews (licensing and license reviews, peer conditions reviews)
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 3 Key Industry Lessons Learned from Tabletop Inspection Process
Overarching theme: clarity and documentation are vital
- Use and definition of various models
Model of record
Working models
Application specific models
- Documentation and procedures for engagement with engineering on modification reviews
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 4 Industry Actions Moving Forward
Internal industry best practices Owners Continued Group report engagement on best with NRC practices
High performance in licensee P R A
configuration control
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 5 Future Engagement with NRC
Orderly and predictable roll-out Scope of training for NRC regional staff and other staff supporting inspections
- Consistency in interpretations
- Delineation between information and operating experience Appropriately sized inspection process
- Inspection team size
- Scope of inspection
- Ensure no repetition of previous reviews Inspection interval
- Four years conflicts with schedule for application-driven model updates
- Consider lengthening to make best use of NRC and licensee resources
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 6