ML21159A223: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Public Meeting between NRC & NEI Migration to RG 1.200 Revision 3 for Existing Risk-Informed Applications June 11, 2021 Shilp Vasavada, Chief (A), PRA Licensing Branch B Division of Risk Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Ed Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
 
==Purpose:==
Discuss process for licensees to incorporate RG 1.200, Revision 3, in existing risk-informed applications that were originally approved using a previous revision.
2
 
Discussion
* When a risk-informed application is approved, the version of RG 1.200 used to support the application is incorporated into the plant licensing basis (either explicitly or implicitly)
* Changes to the licensing basis (such as using a different revision of RG 1.200) need to be evaluated for the need for prior NRC review and approval
* 10 CFR 50.59 provides criteria unless there is a more specific change control process in the code (e.g., 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR 50.55a, etc.)
* Licensees are responsible for performing this evaluation and the evaluation is subject to inspection 3}}

Revision as of 09:12, 8 September 2021

Public Meeting Between NRC & NEI Migration to Rg 1.200 Revision 3 for Existing Risk-Informed Applications June 11, 2021
ML21159A223
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/11/2021
From: Geoffrey Miller, Shilp Vasavada
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, NRC/NRR/DRA
To:
Nuclear Energy Institute
Miller G
References
Download: ML21159A223 (3)


Text