ML20217H228

Offers Concurrence on New York City Acknowledgement Ltr

ML20217H228
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/24/1999
From:	Duane White NRC
To:	Sollenberger D NRC
Shared Package
ML20217H198	List: ML20217H192 ML20217H228
References
NUDOCS 9910220079
Download: ML20217H228 (3)

Text

o

[Denn::! SoHenberger - R;: NYC Acknowledgement Letter - P:ga 1]

From: Duncan White 1

To: Dennis Sollenberger

! Date: Fri, Sep 24,1999 7:00 AM

Subject:

Re: NYC Acknowledgement Letter Looks good. I concur.

>>> Dennis Sollenberger 09/23 3:26 PM >>>

What do you think?

~

' 9910220079 991007 PDR STPRO ESGNY PM

putn p ,

UNITED STATES ,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '

f WASHINGTON, D.C. :106664001

,,,,,*/~ October 7,1999 Neal L. Cohen, M.D. .

Commissioner I New York City Department of Health )

125 Worth Street, Room 329 i New York, NY 10013 I

Dear Dr. Cohen:

Thank you for your letter dated August 25,1999, responding to our request for an evaluation ,

and response to Recommendations 3,5, and 6 of the final Integrated Materials Performance l Evaluation (IMPEP) review report for the New York City Bureau of Radiation Control Program (Recommendations 3,5, and 6 correspond to renumbered Recommendations 1-3 in the April 1999 follow-up review report). We discussed your response to Recommendation 6, with Mr. Gene Miskin, Chief, Bureau of Radiation Control to clarify the training requirements for the scientist position. Based on this discussion, we understand that the scientists (license reviewers) all were promoted to that position from the assistant scientist positions, which requires completion of the core training. Therefore, we understand why additional explanation of the training requirements above the assistant scientist position was not necessary in the response. The other questions were on the specific courses being required as core training.

Our discussion with the Bureau Chief clarified course content for one course and the need for consideration of adding two other courses to the core requirements. The Bureau Chief stated that he is considering making some changes to the list of core courses. With these proposed changes and additional understanding, we find your responses adequate. We will review the status of these actions during the next periodic meeting with New York City, Bureau of Radiation Control staff and during the routine IMPEP review.

We appree!9ts the positive actions that you and your staff have taken and are continuing to implement with regard to our comments. I look forward to our agencies continuing to work cooperatively in the future.

Si rely, q Paul H. Lohaus, Director Office of State Programs cpnese0% \ P-

u ._ . __. ._

)

AdWSTATE: PROGRAMS: OFFICE TRACKING SYSTEMiy p w mM: m w w n a v n m m me$;.if nan o fd,vyn mn u. nm g'w s N@BJAf.

f 9 g Wjv ' ,W ey ,44 4^

m u y" t ,

E3m *UQ w; % gy,(0,c,gpif',4. w,htM~M W.,', .;;rDa . g;,4;;p:

$G% .: n$/j"K:EACTIVE.

su ,.s ;;,as.j e - -- - . m >

9=

%, M ' dm m , ' s ;w 496p ep

.Wi a oM. .

i% 4,9Q Z.1'

' v;ng w

+ *wy&v.Qtw M bM(WW uT h 7W.

wm - *q;a.4,np afMjn @m,y s

g&g

pKq p.,1. M ywW J..nZ.w . y, O g>+ + %. - -

4

'N4

m _ g -r . ( z,g

, y.( s ; ; q. p;_ pg. { g

..-u g.

g.,

n; Ayy u g , . . . . .; c,. ., , i ~

g. 4 9l 4 W L2 s -

fj a mw . %,-j~W,ar r1 ._ . ,c%' +;%:. o.o r.N w

w. %p.

U,ikygm. %i m.ym.m Ocde: . l4;;q;;;/a=/99%;~ u g di g Q- @4,%q, m _DVy..w g.g

,p.3 r r. +.rm .-

-c f;yg,%l , qa, M%g 3 , x ,-

y 4q.A. 7 ,

holecN9GW  %. g * , JM ; ga s < .%. ~ ,}.w K y]

pfcholec2escf550n:)

a4

!% M,*r~f J45, FINAL IMPEP FOLLOW-UP REVIEW REPORT

[:@Mg's,

.l %Q.<

Ayd:;W % it k: \ h na

.Aggdy

'inJp Ah)  :;k}f ~ Qq' ~V,' ~T Q ".  ;

. m9 f%f m . W 9 Stor9 ate; a -;W&{"p"lmmy/1/99f 9 O

' QnalDatelyl t QMd W ' 1

@M*TNWT" 10/1/99' Pyafw ma+ lSOLLENBERGER v ',.

=c~77mr $ Q

"~~*"~ @iO4 W "@f.TTT3 SJQM Compiegoncede,:ll l M.

- > ' 'Duo - - Date:2l ,o. 10/1/99M sM - *

1. gn . - gn u wAAt .

, w __ _ _ .~ ~ a . e ro, p ,s,.

4 m Q.;.

i MN im, epn$$alue:L LTR 10 FRANK MIRAG' A FROM COMMISS!ONER NEAL COHEN y a %g; -

".4. .

1.

I t

as -5 3

4h,,,WIG%)1 a $k Y. & ? 03 mzy --9j ,sy

>s.}__ -(}

, 'a [' lR 3^ @-wif "*""'""#~**'

MfffR .},[ l

1. ~

. _ _,,y ng sequensvosoe:,[5"N"EAL COHEN /.NYCITY _J%s wa v _ . _ _ , . - w

/ ,

-'g;.~. 9> Ud4 #Mpj Sg Qe~3';49 . . . wp.4p .m$ ,- pe_pW;? e ' N.;f ?, ;;* ;y# ym W 'q gg. g? . o g4: .!..J

)my,,

+:

p, s ephaw y ;an. <?tQ ,'.e. .

>+

e, q ;

a ,.

a v.3 iv - $n .

i

. . k, e P

- e j

yy : , #

r j %:-m @s..4; , , , , ,

,y g m

.v .;,. p ?)  : $$  ;

, . f fy ; y :,1

+

gm f"rN '_#>y., m. ~[. .: > > ~ n, , : , . . : - . = = n w m. _=.; %. . w;- .+

h y.m'A

.. , .c -, > m - ,

. 3.<

[ [ 1 1 p, > . ' 3 ': I j

%u - A'.0 .gy.,.$W wC 049:m w Qw

_ )Afto:

www:.WW, %l ~mv , > .,  ?

.'43:5 , , n M:6 m'v+? +

m, .~,y gpy

• a g.p g:g,e 1 sp, . ' , . , .y a

m ,'

m.y.y* , , < -

p myn .,,Win, Nau#g. s @. , i i < -Xo g.,

r a

<vs "',-h % ~ . , . - +

• v . ce 7^ ' ?

i >

s- m

,. l h' A.f.. h.h%h daT: l&, .sW

' ,. ' j ?'>'.i

.4 .

dv? . , . ,( f %,%.j

, k p,-_ *4

-- + u. 's' . '. ,.+g..,

' . k' c.Q ^ ' .~

• w r j,',,,,-.p -

8./

e t

-rr , .. ' . -. . k,q p

y /, *l IT , pf 8' ^f 8 +-?.,

M,. wMto ab sms:n awebrM t,HIn..: bW<~ w ; t' ' *+ . ;w] #p;<f t.at yp

--'d"-

,4

• ' , " ' ~" " " ;..

.J ,.

w-q k' y.

f

'4 ' r;'

.i

,mWW' manum.

.f '. - vvT'.R aas.wi A4 enc . '"

as.M# "h

l I

l i

ACTl0N EDO Principal Correspondence Control

' ROM s DUE: ./ / EDO CONTROL: G19990446 DOC DT: 08/25/99 FINAL REPLY:

21 L. Cohen

'w Ycrk City Bureau of Radiological Health as Miraglia, DEDR

'OR SIGNATURE OF : ** GRN **

CRC NO:

ESC:

ROUTING:

FINAL IMPEP FOLLOW-UP REVIEW REPORT Travers Knapp Miraglia Norry Blaha Burns JATE: 08/31/99 Paperiello,NMSS sSSIGNED TO: CONTACT:

1 _Lohaus iPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:

For Appropriate Action. IS g

er>

O en 3:

i9 5

l

- - - - - - -