|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams
| | #REDIRECT [[IR 05000254/1998024]] |
| | number = ML20199E943
| |
| | issue date = 01/14/1999
| |
| | title = Partially Withheld Security Insp Repts 50-254/98-24 & 50-265/98-24.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities Re Physical Protection of Quad Cities Facility.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
| |
| | author name =
| |
| | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
| |
| | addressee name =
| |
| | addressee affiliation =
| |
| | docket = 05000254, 05000265
| |
| | license number =
| |
| | contact person =
| |
| | document report number = 50-254-98-24, 50-265-98-24, NUDOCS 9901210141
| |
| | package number = ML20199E935
| |
| | document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| |
| | page count = 2
| |
| }}
| |
| See also: [[see also::IR 05000254/1998024]]
| |
| | |
| =Text=
| |
| {{#Wiki_filter:. .. . - . - - . . - .-. .-, . . . . _ _ _ - - -.-. . . . .
| |
| .
| |
| 1
| |
| U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
| |
| REGION 111
| |
| , Docket Nos: 50-254;50-265
| |
| l License Nos: DPR-29; DPR-30
| |
| ;
| |
| I
| |
| I Report Nos: 50-254/98024(DRS); 50-265/98024(DRS)
| |
| l Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed) !
| |
| Facility: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 i
| |
| Location: 22710 206'" Avenue North l
| |
| Cordova,IL 61242
| |
| l
| |
| l Dates: December 14-18,1998
| |
| l
| |
| l
| |
| Inspector: Terry J. Madeda, Physical Security Inspector
| |
| l
| |
| l
| |
| l Approved by: James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1
| |
| l Division of Reactor Safety
| |
| i
| |
| l
| |
| i
| |
| I
| |
| <
| |
| 4
| |
| Ehclosure Cent
| |
| i
| |
| . Is Decontrollod
| |
| 9901210141 990114
| |
| PDR ADOCK 05000254
| |
| G PDR
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .
| |
| .
| |
| s
| |
| '
| |
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
| |
| i
| |
| j Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2
| |
| NRC Inspection Reports 50-254/98024; 50-265/98024
| |
| This inspection reviewed plant support activities relating to the physical protection of the Quad
| |
| 2
| |
| Cities facility. The report evaluated security activities related to security plan changes, security
| |
| training and qualifications, security training records, management effectiveness and controls,
| |
| audit and self assessment activities, problem analysis and corrective actions, and follow up to
| |
| .
| |
| a previous inspection finding.
| |
| e The inspector determined that two security plan changes that were implemented by the
| |
| licensee since December 1997 did not decrease the effectiveness of the security plan.
| |
| (Section S3)
| |
| e Security training activities were accurately documented and conducted in an
| |
| appropriate and sound manner. (Section SS)
| |
| e Licensee audit and self-assessment activities regarding the security program were
| |
| , properly implemented. The licensee's plant wide problem identification and corrective
| |
| action tracking program was generally effective. However, discrepancies were
| |
| identified in the security area regarding the documentation of security equipment
| |
| failures. Licensee action was initiated to address this issue. The licensee's security
| |
| department's intemal corrective action tracking system was effective. (Section S7)
| |
| e The inspector identified a violation in which armed response force personnel were
| |
| routinely assigned fire watch duties that prevented them from immediately responding
| |
| to security events. Licensee security management's effectiveness and controls were
| |
| not effective in this case because they did not recognize that response capabilities had
| |
| been reduced. Effective and timely corrective action was implemented. (Section S8.1)
| |
| 2 *" O*" ,.
| |
| e
| |
| ~ c s. 1
| |
| y g C',% t ') -
| |
| }}
| |