ML20196D653: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
00CKE1 NUMBER ni n10 POSED RULE 01     50 (53         FR /W3gl 7 00Mi. il ?
00CKE1 NUMBER ni n10 POSED RULE 01 50 (53 FR /W3gl 7 00Mi. il ?
                                                                      'h Hi c Ju e           8h N Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission                          Attentionp5f0^IF O s n a- .a k t]intyCf.
'h Hi c Ju e 8h N Samuel J. Chilk f0^IF O s n a-.a Secretary of the Commission Attentionp5 k t]intyCf.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                     and Servic6 Or3nch 1717 H Street, N.W.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Servic6 Or3nch 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.         20555
Washington, D.C.
20555


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
 
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
On May 9,     1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether in doubt.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.
it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.       All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.                         ,
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
Sincerely, b2 d,8             .            J 1
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
Name and Address (f v s s e L L U. /3 A/PN ES
All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
                                                                ~
Sincerely, b2 d,8 J
Name and Address (f v s s e L L U.
/3 A/PN ES
~
j cysTER
j cysTER
                            /N th'7~ /? m D                                               l
/N th'7~ /? m D
        /T o n E ", w t s s C' I M 8007010429     900 #
/T o n E ", w t s s C' I M 8007010429 900 #
p R                P!M I[/h164Me                                   ,
I[/h164Me P!M p R Os -/ o}}
Os -/ o}}

Latest revision as of 17:59, 10 December 2024

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20196D653
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/06/1988
From: Robin Barnes
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00856, 53FR16435-856, NUDOCS 8807010429
Download: ML20196D653 (1)
v • d • e


Text

.

00CKE1 NUMBER ni n10 POSED RULE 01 50 (53 FR /W3gl 7 00Mi. il ?

'h Hi c Ju e 8h N Samuel J. Chilk f0^IF O s n a-.a Secretary of the Commission Attentionp5 k t]intyCf.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Servic6 Or3nch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Sir:

On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.

The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.

In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.

All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.

Sincerely, b2 d,8 J

Name and Address (f v s s e L L U.

/3 A/PN ES

~

j cysTER

/N th'7~ /? m D

/T o n E ", w t s s C' I M 8007010429 900 #

I[/h164Me P!M p R Os -/ o

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20196D653&oldid=4114290"