ML20196D178: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:i                                          .
Dov'E NUMBER p' g g                =
PROPOSED ROLE 3 0 I N 43 b)
D'C E ii.F
:U
* C                          Mh N M bre                , 1988 Samuel J. Chilk                                                              IC Secretary of the Commission                              FFKi.
t!'e'uUi  5i .x%ket ing iefti U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                          and{Or"viceBranch 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.      20555
 
==Dear Sir:==
 
On Hay 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including of fsite emergency response                                          .
,    plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any deg:ee of risk to the public, ineluding risks from low power operation.
Sincerely,                        7 h0A+t S            nD cum Name and Address:        [ vo*aw    -  e'n      M 3s ca                u _.                          '
L3    '
hwJwa M H . o 3 r 2. V                      <
T s. J                      t%enPlag ase g p A ealN g-as~ w-{& uWaan A .T.          '
G G tL. eveM L      are_? (b
: a. W %u w no sk          QL O      $ e VYi P_  m%        w                . Such w Q 'N C.L.utt-st.k                fl.C d.ht.
A < Ic>ss % tm.          ~ m o sty w>            capdak % W w'w< 8'&                          '
ca. M 16                                        L t% h                    1 LLAM $^f)Q                      YW%t 5 O D 8807010326 880606 s--
f6              LL l
U PDR    PR 50 53FR16435          PDR    _,
[$-/6      ,}}

Revision as of 05:09, 13 November 2020

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Proposed Rule Developed W/Only Util Interest in Mind
ML20196D178
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 06/06/1988
From: Bingham V
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00829, 53FR16435-829, NUDOCS 8807010326
Download: ML20196D178 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:i . Dov'E NUMBER p' g g = PROPOSED ROLE 3 0 I N 43 b) D'C E ii.F

U
  • C Mh N M bre , 1988 Samuel J. Chilk IC Secretary of the Commission FFKi.

t!'e'uUi 5i .x%ket ing iefti U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and{Or"viceBranch 1717 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Sir:

On Hay 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including of fsite emergency response . , plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any deg:ee of risk to the public, ineluding risks from low power operation. Sincerely, 7 h0A+t S nD cum Name and Address: [ vo*aw - e'n M 3s ca u _. ' L3 ' hwJwa M H . o 3 r 2. V < T s. J t%enPlag ase g p A ealN g-as~ w-{& uWaan A .T. ' G G tL. eveM L are_? (b

a. W %u w no sk QL O $ e VYi P_ m% w . Such w Q 'N C.L.utt-st.k fl.C d.ht.

A < Ic>ss % tm. ~ m o sty w> capdak % W w'w< 8'& ' ca. M 16 L t% h 1 LLAM $^f)Q YW%t 5 O D 8807010326 880606 s-- f6 LL l U PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR _, [$-/6 ,}}