ML20133C169: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000729/2008012]]
| number = ML20133C169
| issue date = 09/26/1985
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 850729-0812
| author name =
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000322
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-322-85-31, NUDOCS 8510070256
| package number = ML20133C166
| document type = NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF A REGULATION, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 4
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000729/2008012]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.            _                              __    __                              _    _
      .
      '
                                                                                                          ,
    :                                                                                                    l
                                                                                                          ,
i
i-                                                NOTICE OF VIOLATION
            Long Island Lighting Company                              Docket No. 50-322
            Shoreham Nuclear Power Station                            License No. NPF-36
            During an NRC inspection conducted on July 29 - August 12, 1985 a violation of
            NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved conducting startup test
            program test activities not fully in accordance with the governing procedures,
j            In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC En-
            forcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed
            below.
            A.      10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V requires in part that " activities affect-
                    ing quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures and shall be ac-
                  complished in accordance with these procedures." Technical Specification
i                6.8.1 contains similar requirements.
                  Contrary to the above, during the startup testing program three examples
                  were identified wherein test personnel did not implement their governing
                  procedures for activities affecting quality. First, on August 8, 1985,
                  while performing a control rod drive friction test on selected control
*
                  rods, test personnel did not connect the pressure differential test box
                  with the control rod fully inserted and conduct the settling friction test
                  on rod 18-27 with the cooling water valve closed as required in procedure
                  STP-5.8.2. Second, during inspector review of test results on August 9,
                  1985, it was noted that test personnel did not prepare a test exception
                  for those level indicators (1821-LT-154/155 and 1C61-LI-004) that did not
j                  meet the test acceptance criteria of STP-9.8.1 as required by the admini-
                  strative procedure SP-12-075.01. Third, during inspector review of test
                  results on August 11, 1985, it was noted that test personnel did not
                  evaluate the settling friction test of control rod 18-27 in the manner
4
                  prescribed in procedure STP-5.8.2 in that the rod had been identified as
'
                  having passed the test acceptance criteria, whereas the analysis performed
                  as prescribed in the procedure showed that the rod (18-27) did not satisfy.
                  the acceptance criteria.
;'                The consequences of each of the above procedure non-compliances on plant
                  operations, testing and safety are minimal and each item was corrected by
                  the licensee when identified. When considered together, these examples
                  constitute a violation. This is a Severity Level V violation
                  (Supplement I).
!          Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station
i          is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of
            the letter which transmitted this Notice, a written statement or explanation in
            reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the
            results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further
            violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good
i
            cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.
l-          Since item (1) was reviewed by the inspector and is documented in this r'eport
l          you need not address this action item in your reply.
,
                                            ICIAL RECORD COPY        IR SHOREH          -
                                                                                              .0.0
:      8510070256 850926        322                                  09/24/85
                ADOCK 0
l      gDR
        .-          - . --    -.          .    .        . .-.            . .- .  -      .  . . _ -
 
.
  Construction                          4
  50-322    -
  Long Island Lighting Company        Long Island Lighting Company
  ATTN:  E. Youngling, Manager,      ATTN:    R. Kubinak, Director QA, Safety
          Nuclear Engineering                  and Compliance
  Shoreham Nuclear Power Station        Shoreham Nuclear Power Station
  P. O. Box 618                        P. O. Box 618
  Wading River, New York 11792        Wading River, New York 11792
  Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
  General Counsel
  Long Island Lighting Company
  250 Old Country Road
  Mineola, New York 11501
  SHOREHAM HEARING SERVICE LIST
  ADDRESSES (just make labels the individuals are not listed in the cc's)
  Gerald C. Crotty, Esquire                Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire
  Ben Wiles, Esquire                      Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing
  Counsel to the Governor                    Appeal Panel
  Executive Chamber                        U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  State Capitol                            Washington, D. C. 20555
  Albany, New York 12224
  Mr. Jay Dunkleberger                    Fabian G. Palomino, Esquire
  New York State Energy Office            Suffolk County Attorney
  Agency Building 2                        Executive Chamber
  Empire State Plaza                      State Capitol
  Albany, New York 12223                  Albany, NY 12224
  Energy Research 3roup, Inc.              Gary J. Edles, Esquire
  400-1 Totten Pond Road                  Atomic Safety and Licensing
  Waltham, Massachusetts 02154                Appeal Panel
                                          U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                          Washington, D. C. 20555
  W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esquire          Howard A. Wilbur, Esquire
  Hunton & Williams                        Atomic Safety and Licensing
  Post Office Box 1535                        Appeal Panel
  Richmond, Virginia 23212                U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                          Washington, D. C. 20555
  Honorable Peter Cohalan                  Robert Abrams, Esquire
  Suffolk County Executive                Peter Bienstock, Esquire
  County Executive / Legislative Bldg.    Department of Law
  Veteran's Memorial Highway              State of New York
  Hauppauge, New York 11788                Room 46-14
                                          Two World Trade Center
                                          New York, New York 10047
  Martin Bradley Ashare, Esquire          Richard M. Kessel
  Suffolk County Attorney                  Chairman and Executive Director
  H. Lee Dennison Building                New York State Consumer Protection Board
  Veteran's Memorial Highway              Room 1725
  Hauppauge, New York 11788                250 Broadway
                                          New York, New York 10007
  James B. Dougherty, Esquire
  3045 Porter Street, N.W.
  Washington, D.C. 20008
 
                                                -.                  .      .                              .          . -
                '
.              .
          .          Construction                                        4
                    50-322
                    MHB Technical Associates                                Rudolph S. Mazzei, Esquire                            i
                    1723 Hamilton Avenue, Suite K                          Assistant Town Attorney
                    San Jose, California 95125                              Town of Brookhaven
                                                                            Department of Law
                    Stephen Latham, Esquire                                475 East Main Street
                  -John F. Shea, Esquire                                    Patchoque, New York 11772
                    Twomey, Latham & Shea
:                  Post Office Box 398                                    Paul Sabatino, II, Attorney at Law
                    33 West Second Street                                  Counsel to Legislature
                    Riverhead, New York 11901                              Legislative Building
                                                                            Veteran's Memorial Highway
                    Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esquire
                    New York State                                          Joseph I. Lieberman, Attorney General
:                    Department of Public Service                          State of Connecticut
i                    Three Empire State Plaza                                30 Trinity Street
!
                    Albany, New York 12223                                  Hartford, Connecticut 06106
i
                    Ezra I. Bialik, Esquire
i                    Assistant Attorney General
-j                  Environmental Protection Bureau
i                    New York State Department of Law
  '
                    2 World Trade Center
                    New York, New York 10047
                    Herbert H. Brown, Esquire
                    Lawrence Coe Lamnpher, Esquire
                    Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill,
'
                      Christopher & Phillips
  !                  1900 M Street, N.W.
!                  Washington, D.C. 20036
                    Karla J. Letsche, Esquire
                    Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill,
;
        .              Christopher & Phillips
                    1900 M Street, N.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20036
)                                                                                                                                .
,
I
I
'
,
.
    .r-    - --  ,    ,  ,.. e    --- , -e    e n. -, -- ,-. -  v-    ,-e,              , - . , -  ,n- - , ,    e,- --
 
                .        .                      .          _ .    .          . _ _ .            - - _ .
                  :                                                                                                                                        l
        -
                                                                                                                                                            l
      -
                                                                                                                                                            !
                                                                  NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                        Long Island Lighting Company                                      Docket No. 50-322
                        Shoreham Nuclear Power Station                                    License No. NPF-36
i                        During an NRC inspection conducted on July 29 - August 12, 1985 a violation of
                        NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved conducting startup test
                        program test activities not fully in accordance with the governing procedures.
                        In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC En-
                        forcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed
i                        below.
!                      A.        10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V requires in part that " activities affect-
                                  ing quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures and shall be ac-
                                complished in accordance with these procedures." Technical Specification
                                6.8.1 contains'similar requirements.
                                          ~
I                              Contrary to the above, during the startup testing program three examples
,                                were identified wherein test personnel did not implement their governing
1                                procedures for activities affecting quality. First, on August 8, 1985,
                                while performing a control rod drive friction test on selected control
                                rods, test personnel did not connect the pressure differential test box
                                with the control rod fully inserted and conduct the settling friction test
1                              on rod 18-27 with the cooling water valve closed as required in procedure
                                STP-5.8.2. Second, during inspector review of test results on Augt. t. 9,
i                                1985, it was noted that test personnel did not prepare a test exception
i
                                for those level indicators (1821-LT-154/155 and IC61-LI-004) that did not
i                                meet the test acceptance criteria of STP-9.8.1 as required by the admini-
                                strative procedure SP-12-G75.01. Third, during inspector review of test
!                                results on August 11, 1985, it was noted that test personnel did not
,                              evaluate the settling friction test of control rod 18-27 in the manner
!                                prescribed in procedure STP-5.8.2 in that the rod had been identified as
l                                having passed the test acceptance criteria, whereas the analysis performed                                                ,
1                                as prescribed in the procedure showed that the rod (18-27) did not satisfy
j                                the acceptance criteria.
;
                                                                                                                                                          -
l                                The consequences of each of the above procedure non-compliances on plant
:
                                operations, testing and safety are minimal and each item was corrected by
                                the licensee when identified. When considered together,-these examples
                                constitute a violation. This is a Severity Level V violation
                                (Supplement I).
t
'
                        Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station
                        is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of
.;                      the letter which transmitted this Notice, a written statement or explanation in
{                      reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the
                        results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further
!
                        violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good
'
                        cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.
                        Since item (1) was reviewed by the inspector and is documented in this report
                        you need not address this action item in your reply.
:
!
,
l
  - .    ~,4..    ,-      --.    . ,,. . - - - ~ ~ ~ . -    .r-  . , , , ,        -.    ,%-  - , . - - - ~ . , - - ~ . , - - , , . - - - , ~ . - ,
}}

Latest revision as of 22:15, 25 September 2020

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20133C169&oldid=2945873"