ML051330298: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page I Richard Emnch - Millstone Draft EIS Richard Emch Millstone Draft EIS Page 1 111 From:               <NancyBurtonEsq @ aol.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:I Richard Emnch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 1 1 Richard Emch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 11 From:  
To:                 <rle~nrc.gov>
<NancyBurtonEsq @ aol.com>
Date:               Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:12 AM
To:  
<rle~nrc.gov>
Date:
Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:12 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 23: Line 26:


==Dear Mr. Emch,==
==Dear Mr. Emch,==
On January 24, 2005 - one week ago - the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone requested that you provide certain information regarding the NRC's draft Environmental Impact Statement. (See a copy of the request, below.)
On January 24, 2005 - one week ago - the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone requested that you provide certain information regarding the NRC's draft Environmental Impact Statement. (See a copy of the request, below.)
During public proceedings in the Town of Waterford, you have invited the public to direct queries to you concerning the draft EIS. Time is of the essence in this matter because, according to the NRC's timetable, March 2 isthe deadline by which it will accept public comments on the draft EIS. Presumably, it will reject public comments after that date.
During public proceedings in the Town of Waterford, you have invited the public to direct queries to you concerning the draft EIS. Time is of the essence in this matter because, according to the NRC's timetable, March 2 is the deadline by which it will accept public comments on the draft EIS. Presumably, it will reject public comments after that date.
This, therefore, isto request that you act promptly to reply to our request and provide the needed information.
This, therefore, is to request that you act promptly to reply to our request and provide the needed information.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Nancy Burton CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST MILLSTONE P.O. Box Niantic CT 06357
Nancy Burton CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST MILLSTONE P.O. Box Niantic CT 06357
Line 34: Line 36:


==Dear Mr. Emch:==
==Dear Mr. Emch:==
This is a request for information pertaining to the Millstone license renewal application submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The information is urgently needed for review by the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone for timely submission of comments on or before March 2, 2005.
This is a request for information pertaining to the Millstone license renewal application submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The information is urgently needed for review by the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone for timely submission of comments on or before March 2, 2005.
Please provide the following:
Please provide the following:
(1)All Requests for Additional Information submitted by the NRC to the licensee and all reports, documents, emails and other correspondence generated and received therefrom.
(1) All Requests for Additional Information submitted by the NRC to the licensee and all reports, documents, emails and other correspondence generated and received therefrom.
(2)Please identify the names of all officials of the State of Connecticut whose input was received for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and please provide all correspondence between the NRC and such officials and all documents provided by such officials.
(2) Please identify the names of all officials of the State of Connecticut whose input was received for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and please provide all correspondence between the NRC and such officials and all documents provided by such officials.
(3)Please identify the names of all individuals and their professional, business or governmental affiliations who provided input to the DEIS and please identify the specific contribution of each.
(3) Please identify the names of all individuals and their professional, business or governmental affiliations who provided input to the DEIS and please identify the specific contribution of each.
(4)Please identify all consulting contracts entered into with consultants on the DEIS, provide a copy of such contracts and the cost of each such service.
(4) Please identify all consulting contracts entered into with consultants on the DEIS, provide a copy of such contracts and the cost of each such service.
(5)Please identify with specificity what other available information" was considered which led the staff to conclude "that there are no impacts of radiation exposures to the public during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS" and "that there are no impacts of occupational radiation exposures during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS." (DEIS at 4.3) Please further identify all sources considered.
(5) Please identify with specificity what other available information" was considered which led the staff to conclude "that there are no impacts of radiation exposures to the public during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS" and "that there are no impacts of occupational radiation exposures during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS." (DEIS at 4.3) Please further identify all sources considered.
(6)Please identify all refurbishment identified by the licensee other than"
(6) Please identify all refurbishment identified by the licensee other than"


Richard Emch - Millstone Draft EIS                                                     Page 2 major" refurbishment and identify the methodology used by the NRC staff to evaluate this issue and whether the licensee's characterization of refurbishment issues as not 'major" was accurate. (DEIS Section 3.0)
Richard Emch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 2 major" refurbishment and identify the methodology used by the NRC staff to evaluate this issue and whether the licensee's characterization of refurbishment issues as not 'major" was accurate. (DEIS Section 3.0)
Please send all correspondence responsive to this request to 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge, Connecticut 06876, Tel. 203-938-3952.
Please send all correspondence responsive to this request to 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge, Connecticut 06876, Tel. 203-938-3952.
Sincerely, Nancy Burton
Sincerely, Nancy Burton


[ cAtemp\GWI00001.TMP                                                                       Page 11...il .
[ cAtemp\\GWI00001.TMP Page 1 il I.:tm \\G }00.TM Pag 1...
I.:tm \G }00 .TM                                                                           Pag Mail Envelope Properties   (41FE208C.6E2 :4: 59106)
Mail Envelope Properties (41FE208C.6E2 :4: 59106)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Millstone Draft EIS Creation Date:        Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:11 AM From:                <NancyBurtonEsc @aol .com>
Creation Date:
Created By:         NancyBurtonEsqC@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 RLE (Richard Emch)
From:
Post Office                                   Route OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1                             nrc.gov Files                         Size              Date & Time MESSAGE                       3241              Monday,January3l,2005 7:11 AM TEXT.htm                     3978 Mime.822                     8904 Options Expiration Date:             None Priority:                     Standard Reply Requested:             No Return Notification:         None Concealed  
Millstone Draft EIS Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:11 AM
<NancyBurtonEsc @aol.com>
Created By:
NancyBurtonEsq C@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 RLE (Richard Emch)
Post Office OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:                     Standard}}
Security:
Size 3241 3978 8904 Date & Time Monday,January3l,2005 7:11 AM None Standard No None No Standard}}

Latest revision as of 18:55, 15 January 2025

E-Mail from Nancy Burton Re Millstone Draft EIS
ML051330298
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/2005
From: Burton N
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone
To: Emch R
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLEP
References
Download: ML051330298 (3)


Text

I Richard Emnch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 1 1 Richard Emch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 11 From:

<NancyBurtonEsq @ aol.com>

To:

<rle~nrc.gov>

Date:

Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:12 AM

Subject:

Millstone Draft EIS

Dear Mr. Emch,

On January 24, 2005 - one week ago - the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone requested that you provide certain information regarding the NRC's draft Environmental Impact Statement. (See a copy of the request, below.)

During public proceedings in the Town of Waterford, you have invited the public to direct queries to you concerning the draft EIS. Time is of the essence in this matter because, according to the NRC's timetable, March 2 is the deadline by which it will accept public comments on the draft EIS. Presumably, it will reject public comments after that date.

This, therefore, is to request that you act promptly to reply to our request and provide the needed information.

Thank you.

Nancy Burton CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST MILLSTONE P.O. Box Niantic CT 06357

_www.mothballmillstone.org- (http://www.mothballmillstone.org)

January 24, 2005 Richard L. Emch, Jr.

Senior Environmental Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20044 Re: Millstone Nuclear Power Station/Environmental Impact Statement

Dear Mr. Emch:

This is a request for information pertaining to the Millstone license renewal application submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The information is urgently needed for review by the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone for timely submission of comments on or before March 2, 2005.

Please provide the following:

(1) All Requests for Additional Information submitted by the NRC to the licensee and all reports, documents, emails and other correspondence generated and received therefrom.

(2) Please identify the names of all officials of the State of Connecticut whose input was received for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and please provide all correspondence between the NRC and such officials and all documents provided by such officials.

(3) Please identify the names of all individuals and their professional, business or governmental affiliations who provided input to the DEIS and please identify the specific contribution of each.

(4) Please identify all consulting contracts entered into with consultants on the DEIS, provide a copy of such contracts and the cost of each such service.

(5) Please identify with specificity what other available information" was considered which led the staff to conclude "that there are no impacts of radiation exposures to the public during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS" and "that there are no impacts of occupational radiation exposures during the renewal term beyond those discussed in the GEIS." (DEIS at 4.3) Please further identify all sources considered.

(6) Please identify all refurbishment identified by the licensee other than"

Richard Emch - Millstone Draft EIS Page 2 major" refurbishment and identify the methodology used by the NRC staff to evaluate this issue and whether the licensee's characterization of refurbishment issues as not 'major" was accurate. (DEIS Section 3.0)

Please send all correspondence responsive to this request to 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge, Connecticut 06876, Tel. 203-938-3952.

Sincerely, Nancy Burton

[ cAtemp\\GWI00001.TMP Page 1 il I.:tm \\G }00.TM Pag 1...

Mail Envelope Properties (41FE208C.6E2 :4: 59106)

Subject:

Creation Date:

From:

Millstone Draft EIS Mon, Jan 31, 2005 7:11 AM

<NancyBurtonEsc @aol.com>

Created By:

NancyBurtonEsq C@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 RLE (Richard Emch)

Post Office OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:

Priority:

Reply Requested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security:

Size 3241 3978 8904 Date & Time Monday,January3l,2005 7:11 AM None Standard No None No Standard