ML20056E407: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1 | {{#Wiki_filter:1 | ||
* Soumern tbelear coeratng Company | * Soumern tbelear coeratng Company Post OMce Box 1235 B>rmingham A:abama 35201 To'epnene (205) 668 5131 | ||
~ | |||
h Southem Nudear Operating Company o.eumy vce Presem r rm p c,em n,e scanem electnc system a | |||
h | 10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos. | ||
Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen: | 50-348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen: | ||
? | |||
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six month reporting period, January 1993 through June 1993, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data is summarized on the attached enclosures. | Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six month reporting period, January 1993 through June 1993, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). | ||
The data is summarized on the attached enclosures. | |||
Should you have any questions, please advise. | Should you have any questions, please advise. | ||
Respectfully submitted, jfl | Respectfully submitted, jfl )fl:.c Dave Morey DNM/JMG s | ||
Enclosures cc: Southern Nuclear Operatina Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley | Enclosures cc: Southern Nuclear Operatina Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley 1 | ||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washinaton. DC Mr. T. A. Reed, Licensing Project Manager - Farley U. S. Nuclear Requlatory Commission. Region II Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. G. F. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley | |||
*'30 0 ' | |||
9308230317 930816 PDR | / | ||
R | 9308230317 930816 PDR ADOCK 05000343 | ||
,1., | |||
R PDR 2d | |||
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Date Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 06-30-93 Cornca'r a kbnra EneN Plant J. M. Farley and Corp. HQ Birmingham, Alabama Locavy Francis Jessup (205) 868-5168 Cor:a nan Phone Onclee a en cooe) | |||
Cutoff s: ScreerrConfirmation (ng'ml) | Cutoff s: ScreerrConfirmation (ng'ml) | ||
Opiates | U Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana | ||
Long-Term | / | ||
Categories | Amphetamines | ||
n | / | ||
/ | |||
l Cocaine | |||
/ | |||
Phencyclidine | |||
/ | |||
/ | |||
Opiates | |||
/ | |||
Alcohol (% BAC) | |||
/ | |||
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number war Unescorted Access 1479 23 60 M | |||
Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 59 0 | |||
2 0 | |||
200 1 | |||
k Post accident 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 n | |||
Eg Observed behavior 1 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 2 | |||
1 Random 797 0 | |||
16 0 | |||
27 0 | |||
Follow-up 22 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
Other Retest /RTW 3 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Total 882 0 | |||
18 0 | |||
229 2 | |||
REV.1/92 | |||
5 | 5 a | ||
F e | |||
e | l l | ||
N | t e | ||
T | e N | ||
T a | |||
*) | |||
..i t*> | |||
t N | t N | ||
t w | t w | ||
\\ | |||
_0 | { F-C s | ||
c | e r | ||
_0 O | |||
C H | |||
0 | ~ | ||
c 5 | |||
i e | |||
k | |||
: c. 3 g | |||
3 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 O | |||
C | C | ||
*C 6* | |||
I C- | 1 O | ||
{. | |||
I C-EE o | |||
o o | |||
o th | |||
<C 4 | |||
b | |||
( | ( | ||
5, | |||
g | --c e | ||
e a | |||
c g | |||
Qh F | |||
-ji. | |||
9 o | |||
0 0 | |||
0 O | |||
a C | |||
Q tt G | |||
2 O | |||
O cC2 C | |||
h C | |||
e O | |||
m | O Q | ||
D f | |||
E E | |||
J C | |||
D E | |||
E p | |||
o O | |||
a f | |||
C U | |||
U e | |||
g g | |||
m t | |||
g, O | |||
.:e p | |||
n w | |||
g 5 | |||
c N | |||
2 0 | |||
a a | |||
v) | |||
W m | |||
>=e | |||
= | |||
J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Corpo' ate Headquarters Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January 1993 through June 1993 has been reviewed and cnalyzed. The data reflected in this report is that of employees of the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and employees of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters. | J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Corpo' ate Headquarters Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January 1993 through June 1993 has been reviewed and cnalyzed. The data reflected in this report is that of employees of the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and employees of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters. | ||
The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on site. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends and holidays at a rate which will equal 100% yearly of the total population. | The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. | ||
In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness For Duty program, it should be emphasized that the incidences of confirming positive tests have been low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of fitness for duty have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken. | Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on site. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends and holidays at a rate which will equal 100% yearly of the total population. | ||
In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness For Duty program, it should be emphasized that the incidences of confirming positive tests have been low. | |||
Consequently, management actions relative to determination of fitness for duty have been limited. | |||
Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken. | |||
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period. | There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period. | ||
There was one occurrence where a performance test specimen (certified by the supplier to be positive and screened on site to be positive for marijuana [THC]) was reported as negative by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) certified laboratory used by Southern Nuclear Operating Company. An investigation was conducted regarding this occurrence. It was determined there was a suppression in discrimination above the cut-off for the THC-100 assay used by the DHHS laboratory which was isolated to channel one on the Olympus instrument. Corrective actions by the DHHS laboratory included switching channels on the Olympus | There was one occurrence where a performance test specimen (certified by the supplier to be positive and screened on site to be positive for marijuana [THC]) was reported as negative by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) certified laboratory used by Southern Nuclear Operating Company. An investigation was conducted regarding this occurrence. | ||
It was determined there was a suppression in discrimination above the cut-off for the THC-100 assay used by the DHHS laboratory which was isolated to channel one on the Olympus instrument. | |||
l l}} | Corrective actions by the DHHS laboratory included switching channels on the Olympus instrument and issuing a repair of the instrument by the manufacturer. A report of the unsatisfactory performance testing was submitted to the NRC on June 28, 1993. | ||
l l | |||
_}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:20, 17 December 2024
| ML20056E407 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley |
| Issue date: | 08/16/1993 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9308230317 | |
| Download: ML20056E407 (4) | |
Text
1
- Soumern tbelear coeratng Company Post OMce Box 1235 B>rmingham A:abama 35201 To'epnene (205) 668 5131
~
h Southem Nudear Operating Company o.eumy vce Presem r rm p c,em n,e scanem electnc system a
10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos.
50-348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:
?
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six month reporting period, January 1993 through June 1993, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d).
The data is summarized on the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, jfl )fl:.c Dave Morey DNM/JMG s
Enclosures cc: Southern Nuclear Operatina Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley 1
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washinaton. DC Mr. T. A. Reed, Licensing Project Manager - Farley U. S. Nuclear Requlatory Commission. Region II Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. G. F. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley
- '30 0 '
/
9308230317 930816 PDR ADOCK 05000343
,1.,
R PDR 2d
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Date Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 06-30-93 Cornca'r a kbnra EneN Plant J. M. Farley and Corp. HQ Birmingham, Alabama Locavy Francis Jessup (205) 868-5168 Cor:a nan Phone Onclee a en cooe)
Cutoff s: ScreerrConfirmation (ng'ml)
U Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
l Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number war Unescorted Access 1479 23 60 M
Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 59 0
2 0
200 1
k Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 n
Eg Observed behavior 1
0 0
0 2
1 Random 797 0
16 0
27 0
Follow-up 22 0
0 0
0 0
Other Retest /RTW 3
0 0
0 0
0 Total 882 0
18 0
229 2
REV.1/92
5 a
F e
l l
t e
e N
T a
- )
..i t*>
t N
t w
\\
{ F-C s
e r
_0 O
C H
~
c 5
i e
k
- c. 3 g
3 0
0 0
0 O
C
- C 6*
1 O
{.
I C-EE o
o o
o th
<C 4
b
(
5,
--c e
e a
c g
Qh F
-ji.
9 o
0 0
0 O
a C
Q tt G
2 O
O cC2 C
h C
e O
O Q
D f
E E
J C
D E
E p
o O
a f
C U
U e
g g
m t
g, O
.:e p
n w
g 5
c N
2 0
a a
v)
W m
>=e
=
J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Corpo' ate Headquarters Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January 1993 through June 1993 has been reviewed and cnalyzed. The data reflected in this report is that of employees of the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and employees of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters.
The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access.
Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on site. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends and holidays at a rate which will equal 100% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness For Duty program, it should be emphasized that the incidences of confirming positive tests have been low.
Consequently, management actions relative to determination of fitness for duty have been limited.
Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken.
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period.
There was one occurrence where a performance test specimen (certified by the supplier to be positive and screened on site to be positive for marijuana [THC]) was reported as negative by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) certified laboratory used by Southern Nuclear Operating Company. An investigation was conducted regarding this occurrence.
It was determined there was a suppression in discrimination above the cut-off for the THC-100 assay used by the DHHS laboratory which was isolated to channel one on the Olympus instrument.
Corrective actions by the DHHS laboratory included switching channels on the Olympus instrument and issuing a repair of the instrument by the manufacturer. A report of the unsatisfactory performance testing was submitted to the NRC on June 28, 1993.
l l
_