ML18227B706: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P. O. BOX 013100. MIAMI, FL 33101 Qt ii~,
{{#Wiki_filter:P. O. BOX 013100. MIAMI, FL 33101 Qt ii~,
Y FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY February 1, 1977 L-77-36 Norman C. Moseley,   Director Office of Inspection & Enforcement, Region   II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree Street, N. W., Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Y FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT COMPANY February 1, 1977 L-77-36 Norman C. Moseley, Director Office of Inspection
& Enforcement, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree
: Street, N. W., Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==Dear Mr.'oseley:==
==Dear Mr.'oseley:==
 
Re:
Re:   IE: II: AKH 50-250/76-1 50-251/76-1 This letter is submitted in accordance with the     commitments made in my letter dated March 29, 1976. The st'atus of the Turkey Point Drawings Program   is as follows:
IE: II: AKH 50-250/76-1 50-251/76-1 This letter is submitted in accordance with the commitments made in my {{letter dated|date=March 29, 1976|text=letter dated March 29, 1976}}.
: l. As of January 31, 1977, a forty-five (845) drawings total of eight hundred have been updated as built in the field.
The st'atus of the Turkey Point Drawings Program is as follows:
: 2. Of these, six hundred & forty-two (642) have re-ceived final approval and released to the field; eighty-six (86) in the final approval cycle; and one hundred & seventeen (117) are undergoing drafting and final, review for adequacy.
l.
As of January 31,
: 1977, a total of eight hundred
& forty-five (845) drawings have been updated as built in the field.
2.
Of these, six hundred
& forty-two (642) have re-ceived final approval and released to the field; eighty-six (86) in the final approval cycle; and one hundred
& seventeen (117) are undergoing drafting and final, review for adequacy.
During this period, nineteen (19) new drawings were gen-erated by Engineering and released to the field, and eighty-six (86) are in the final approval cycle.
During this period, nineteen (19) new drawings were gen-erated by Engineering and released to the field, and eighty-six (86) are in the final approval cycle.
Very truly yours, Robert. E. Uhrig Vice President REU/NFA/hlc cc:   Robert Lowenstein, Esq.
Very truly yours, Robert. E. Uhrig Vice President REU/NFA/hlc cc:
Robert Lowenstein, Esq.
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE


NRC FoRM 195 (2 76)        RC>>-                            I            U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Co" >>"EMISSION.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Co" >>"EMISSION.
NRC DISTRIBUTION FoR PART 60 DOCKE I 1VIATE Rl AL Florida  Power &      Light FILE NUMBER DATE OF DJCVhdfflT J uzi Mr Lear                                                                                       Co Miami, Fla     "
1VIAT Rl L
R E   Uhrig                                                   1"28-77 g1.ETTE R                    .0 NOTOR IZ E D          PROP                      INPUT FORM                  NUMBERNF COPIES RECEIVED gfoRIGINAL                                                                                                I
I NRC FoRM 195 (2 76)
                              %UNCLASSIFIED Dcop'Y                                                                                                  one,sI    ironed DES C 0 IP T ION                                                     ENCLOSURE Ltr re         our NRC   request....t;rans     the                 Addi     info re steam 'Generator'tube Integrity following:                                                                ..(40 cys e'ncl rec'd) lp                                                                          6p . ~
RC>>-
PLANT NAMF:             Turkey Point jj3 & 4
NRC DISTRIBUTION FoR PART 60 DOCKE I E
                                                                                  )KKCZ MM~
A FILE NUMBER J uzi Mr Lear g1.ETTE R gfoRIGINAL Dcop'Y
SAFETY                                 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION ASSXGNED AD:
.0 NOTOR IZE D
N                                   c v                                                                              A>>
%UNCLASSIFIED PROP Florida Power
PRO EC~TNAEA           EEj                     /0                     PROJECT       MANAGER'IC LXC        ASST                                                                 ASST INTERNAL D IST RI BUTION
& Light Co Miami, Fla R E Uhrig INPUT FORM DATE OF DJCVhdfflT 1"28-77 NUMBERNF COPIES RECEIVED Ione,s ironed I
              ~
DES C 0 IP T ION Ltr re our NRC request....t;rans the following:
ILE                           SYSTEMS SAFETY                PLANT SYSTEMS                        S TE SAFF, NRC PDR                                 HEIhTEMAN                      TEDES 0 I&E                                     SCHROEDER OELD GOSSICK & STAFF                         ENGINEERING                   IPPOL TO                            E MIPC                                    MACARRY                                                             ERNST CASE                                    KNIGHT                                                             BALLARD HANAUER                                  SIfSKIL                       OPERATXNG REACTORS                  SPANGLER HARLESS                                  PAWLICK                       STELLO SITE TECII PROJECT MANAGEMENT                       REACTOR SAFE                  OPERATING TECH                      GAMMILL BOYD                                     ROSS                           EXSENHUT                            STEPP PE COLLINS                               NOVAK                                                              HULMAN HOUSTON                                 ROSZTOCZY PETERSON                                 CHECK                         'B      E                            SXTE ANALYSIS MELTZ                                                                                                       VOLLMER HELTEMES                                 AT & I                                                             BUNCH SKOVHOLT                                 SALTZMAN                                                           J ~ COLLINS
lp ENCLOSURE Addi info re steam 'Generator'tube Integrity
                                                                                      ~
..(40 cys e'ncl rec'd) 6p
RUTBERG                                                             KREGER EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION                                                     CONTROL NUMBFR LPDR'SIC:
~
NAT LAB ~
PLANT NAMF:
REG V IE B  ~$
Turkey Point jj3 & 4
ULR KSON                    OR LA PDR ASLB:                                 CONSULTANTS:
)KKCZMM~
ACRE           CYE   iEKCTEC/   E   T~A NRC FORM 196 <2.76)
SAFETY ASSXGNED AD:
N PRO EC~TNAEA EEj LXC ASST c v
/0 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION PROJECT MANAGER'IC ASST A>>
~ ILE NRC PDR I&E OELD GOSSICK & STAFF MIPC CASE HANAUER HARLESS INTERNALD SYSTEMS SAFETY HEIhTEMAN SCHROEDER ENGINEERING MACARRY KNIGHT SIfSKIL PAWLICK REACTOR SAFE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BOYD ROSS NOVAK PE COLLINS HOUSTON ROSZTOCZY PETERSON CHECK MELTZ HELTEMES AT & I SKOVHOLT SALTZMAN RUTBERG EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION NAT LAB~
REG V IE LA PDR LPDR'SIC:
ASLB:
CONSULTANTS:
ACRE CYE iEKCTEC/ E T~A ISTRI BUTION PLANT SYSTEMS TEDES 0 IPPOL TO OPERATXNG REACTORS STELLO OPERATING TECH EXSENHUT
'B E
B ~$~
ULR KSON OR S TE SAFF, E
ERNST BALLARD SPANGLER SITE TECII GAMMILL STEPP HULMAN SXTE ANALYSIS VOLLMER BUNCH J ~ COLLINS KREGER CONTROL NUMBFR NRC FORM 196 <2.76)


.~ 'I, -~
.~
                    ~ ~ ~ ~
'I, - ~
          ~ ~ o ~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
o
~
~


t   P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 Q~l leer Ieguiatory Docket.            FI<A FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY January 21, 1977 L-77-30 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. George Lear, Chief                                           (g  Ip Operating Reactors Branch 53 Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.     20555
Ieguiatory Docket. FI<A t P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 Q~l leer FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY January 21, 1977 L-77-30 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 53 Division of Operating Reactors U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 (g Ip


==Dear Mr. Lear:==
==Dear Mr. Lear:==
Re<
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 Steam Generator Tube Xntegrity Su olemental'n'f oxma't'io'n'he attached information is submitted in response to a request.
from your staff.
Xt supplements previous information submitted in our letters L-76-432, L-76-434, and L-77-3.
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/ms Attachment cc:
Norman C. Moseley, Region IX Robert Lowenstein, Esquire 01 oocxaco I/a g/
U 5. WCIg CORI Nol
'I RI'EOPLE...
SERVING PEOPLE
F
ATTACHMENT'urkey Point Units 3 and 4
Request for Information Steam Generator Tube Int'e rit Q13. Provide a tabulation summary of the total strains in the circumferential, longitudinal and radial direction at the U-bend apex for tubes at flow slot locations in rows 1 to 4.
The summary should. indicate the effects due to manufacturing, service induced. ovality (hourglassing),
change in U-bend radius, operating thermal and pressure loads and accident loads.
Also compute the effective strains at the U-bend apex.
Clarification of above question.
a.
Provide the requested tabulation for a total of 32 tubes (eight tubes adjacent to the flow slot in rows 1 through 4.)
b.
For the tubes in row 1 provide the requested tabulation for the following two cases.
(1)
Flow slot hourglassing based on current field data for the top support plate in Steam Gener-ator 4B (2)
Assuming full closure of the flow slot c.
For those tubes in rows 2, 3 and 4 provide the requested tabulation assuming full closure of the flow slot.
'13.
As indicated in our response to Question li the operating thermal.
and pressure strains are trivial,and can, be neglected.
Similarly, the strains due to =SSE and other accident loads are. quite small and are effectively zero when compared to those due to hourglassing.
Our table will onlv include manu-facturing and in-service (hourglassing)'. strains and a summation, for, each quantity requested.
The summation is inclusive of operating and accident conditions.
j


Re<  Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Steam Generator Tube Xntegrity Su  olemental'n'f oxma't'io'n'he attached information              is submitted in      response to a request. from your  staff.             Xt supplements previous information submitted in our  letters            L-76-432, L-76-434, and L-77-3.
TABLE 1 ROLU 1 8 CURRENT HOURGLASSING (UNIT 4) axial
Very  truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/ms Attachment cc:  Norman C. Moseley, Region IX Robert Lowenstein, Esquire                              oocxaco 01 I/a g/
=hoo radial 6e u.
U 5. WCIg
~
                                                                        'I CORI Nol RI'EOPLE...
~
SERVING PEOPLE
Mfg.
Column
.177
.004
.040
. 133 86 87 88 89 90 92 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.014
.191
.013
.190
.012
.189
.010
.187
.007
. 184
.004
.121
.177
.177
.008
.012
.009
.013
.009
.013
.008
.012
.004
.008
.003
.007
.004
.004
.044
.004
.044
.004
.044
.003
.043
.002
.042
.001
.041
.040
. 141
., 140
. 140
. 138
. 137
. 134
.133
-133
* No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains
 
s


F ATTACHMENT'urkey Point Units 3 and                  4 Request  for Information Steam Generator Tube Int'e                  rit Q13. Provide a  tabulation summary of the total strains in the circumferential, longitudinal and radial direction at the U-bend apex for tubes at flow slot locations in rows 1 to 4. The summary should. indicate the effects due to manufacturing, service induced. ovality (hourglassing),
TABLE 2 ROW 1 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.
change in U-bend radius, operating thermal and pressure loads and accident loads.                     Also compute the effective strains at the U-bend apex.
I Column
Clarification of    above                question.
. 177
: a. Provide the requested tabulation for a total of 32 tubes (eight tubes adjacent to the flow slot in rows 1 through 4.)
.004
: b. For the tubes in row 1 provide the requested tabulation for the following two cases.
-.040 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H
(1)  Flow slot hourglassing based on current field data for the top support plate in Steam Gener-ator 4B (2)  Assuming  full closure of                  the flow slot
T H
: c. For those tubes                  in  rows 2,  3 and 4 provide the requested tabulation assuming                  full closure of  the flow slot.
T H
indicated in our response to Question li the operating thermal.
T H
                                                                                '13.
T H
As and pressure strains are trivial,and can, be neglected.
T H
Similarly, the strains due to =SSE and other accident loads are. quite small and are effectively zero when compared to those due to hourglassing.                     Our table will onlv include manu-facturing and in-service (hourglassing)'. strains and a summation, for, each quantity requested.                     The summation is inclusive of operating and accident conditions.
T H
T H
T
.044
.221
.043
.220
.038
.215
.031
.208
.023
.200
.012
.189
.177
.177
.043
.047
. 043
.047
.039
.043
. 032
.036
.019
.023
. 009.
.013
.004
.004
.014
.054
.014
-.054
-.012
.052
-.010
.050
.007
.047
.004
.044
-. 040
.040
* No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains


j TABLE 1 ROLU  1 8 CURRENT HOURGLASSING (UNIT 4) 6 axial      =hoo    radial      e  u.
TABLE 3 ROW 2 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg I
~ ~
Column
Mfg.                           .040
~axial
                    .177        .004                . 133 Column H          .014      .008    .004      . 141 T          .191      .012    .044 H          .013       .009    .004 86                                  .044      ., 140 T          .190      .013 H          .012      .009    .004      . 140 87                                  .044 T          .189      .013 H          .010      .008    .003 88                                  .043      . 138 T          .187        .012 H          .007      .004    .002 89                                  .042      . 137 T          . 184      .008
.112
                    .004      .003    .001 90                                  .041      . 134
.003
                    .121      .007 H
.030
* T        .177                            .133 H                                        -133 92                          .004    .040 T        .177
~hop
* No   Leg Displacement H   Strains due to hourglassing T   Total Strains
< a
.085 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.022
.134
.022
.134
.021
.133
.018
.130
.013
.125
.008
.120
.112
.034
.037
.034
.037
.027
.030
.021
.024
.011
.014
.006
.009
** PP3
.00
** P04
. 007
.024
.054
.023
.053
.021
.051
.018
.048
.013
.043
-. 008
-.030
.030
.109
.108
.106
.104
.099
. 093
.085
.085
* No Leg Displacement, H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains These strains result from dimensions taken from the removed tubes.
A possible explan-ation is that these tubes had higher ovality, as manufactured, than the statistical average.


s TABLE 2 ROW 1 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.
~
Column I      . 177      .004    -.040 H        .044      .043    .014 85    T          .221      .047    .054 H        .043      . 043    .014 86      T        .220      .047    -.054 87      H        .038      .039    -.012 T        .215      .043    .052 88      H        .031      . 032    -.010 T        .208      .036    .050 H        .023      .019    .007 89                                    .047 T        .200      .023 H        .012      . 009.  .004 90                                    .044 T        .189      .013 H
~
91 T          .177      .004    -. 040 H
92      T          .177      .004    .040
* No Leg Displacement H    Strains due to hourglassing T    Total Strains


TABLE 3 ROW 2 9 FULL CLOSURE
TABLE 4 RON 3 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.
                ~axial      ~hop    < a Mfg I     .112      .003      .030          .085 Column H        .022      .034      .024 85                                     .054          .109 T         .134      .037 H         .022      .034      .023 86                                    .053          .108 T        .134      .037 H        .021      .027      .021 87                                    .051          .106 T        .133      .030 H        .018       .021      .018 88                                    .048          .104 T        .130      .024 H        .013       .011      .013          .099 89      T        .125      .014      .043 90                .008      .006      -. 008        . 093
c I
                  .120      .009      -.030 91
Column axial
                            ** PP3
.082 hoo
                                                      .085
.005
                              .00 H                  ** P04                    .085 92      T        .112      . 007    .030
.020 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H
* No Leg Displacement, H   Strains due   to hourglassing T   Total Strains These strains result from dimensions taken from the removed tubes. A possible explan-ation is that these tubes had higher ovality, as manufactured,    than the  statistical  average.
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.015
.097
.015
.097
.013
.095
.011
.093
.009
.091
.005
.087
.082
.018 23
.018
.023
.013
.013
.009
.014
.004
.009
.001
.006
.005
.024
-.044
-.023
-.043
-.021
>>.041
.017
.037
.012
.032
-.006
.026
.020
" No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains


~ ~
4
TABLE 4 RON 3 9  FULL CLOSURE axial        hoo Mfg. I c
                    .082        .005    .020 Column 85    H          .015        .018    .024 T          .097          23    -.044 86    H          .015        .018    -.023 T          .097        .023    -.043 87      H          .013        .013    -.021 T          .095        .013    >>.041 H          .011        .009    .017 88                                      .037 T          .093        .014 H          .009        .004    .012 89                                      .032 T          .091        .009 90      H          .005        .001    -.006 T          .087        .006    .026 91      H T
H 92      T          .082      .005    .020
        "    No  Leg Displacement H      Strains due to hourglassing T    Total Strains


4 TABLE 5 ROW 4 9 FULL CLOSURE axial       hoo Mfg., s
TABLE 5 ROW 4 9 FULL CLOSURE axial hoo Mfg., s Column
                  .064       .002     .020 Column
.064
        . H     .012       .014    .024 85        T      .076       .016    .044 H      .012        .014     .023 86                                    .043 T      .076        .016 H      .011       .011    .021 87                                    .041 T      .075        .013 H      .010        .007    .017 T      .074        .009    -.037 89              .007        .003    .012 90       H     .004       .002    -.007 T      .068        .004     .027 91                                    .020
.002
                  . 064      .002 92
.020 85 86 87 89
                  .064       .002     .020
. H T
* No Leg Displacement H   Strain due to hourglassing T - Total Strain
H T
H T
H T
.012
.076
.012
.076
.011
.075
.010
.074
.007
.014
.016
.014
.016
.011
.013
.007
.009
.003
.024
.044
.023
.043
.021
.041
.017
-.037
.012 90 91 H
T
.004
.068
. 064
.002
.004
.002
-.007
.027
.020 92
.064
.002
.020
* No Leg Displacement H Strain due to hourglassing T - Total Strain


0 ~ t.}}
0
~
t.}}

Latest revision as of 14:39, 5 January 2025

Provides Additional Information on Steam Generator Tube Integrity
ML18227B706
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/1977
From: Robert E. Uhrig
Florida Power & Light Co
To: Moseley N
NRC/RGN-II
References
L-77-36
Download: ML18227B706 (18)


Text

P. O. BOX 013100. MIAMI, FL 33101 Qt ii~,

Y FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT COMPANY February 1, 1977 L-77-36 Norman C. Moseley, Director Office of Inspection

& Enforcement, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree

Street, N. W., Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr.'oseley:

Re:

IE: II: AKH 50-250/76-1 50-251/76-1 This letter is submitted in accordance with the commitments made in my letter dated March 29, 1976.

The st'atus of the Turkey Point Drawings Program is as follows:

l.

As of January 31,

1977, a total of eight hundred

& forty-five (845) drawings have been updated as built in the field.

2.

Of these, six hundred

& forty-two (642) have re-ceived final approval and released to the field; eighty-six (86) in the final approval cycle; and one hundred

& seventeen (117) are undergoing drafting and final, review for adequacy.

During this period, nineteen (19) new drawings were gen-erated by Engineering and released to the field, and eighty-six (86) are in the final approval cycle.

Very truly yours, Robert. E. Uhrig Vice President REU/NFA/hlc cc:

Robert Lowenstein, Esq.

PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Co" >>"EMISSION.

1VIAT Rl L

I NRC FoRM 195 (2 76)

RC>>-

NRC DISTRIBUTION FoR PART 60 DOCKE I E

A FILE NUMBER J uzi Mr Lear g1.ETTE R gfoRIGINAL Dcop'Y

.0 NOTOR IZE D

%UNCLASSIFIED PROP Florida Power

& Light Co Miami, Fla R E Uhrig INPUT FORM DATE OF DJCVhdfflT 1"28-77 NUMBERNF COPIES RECEIVED Ione,s ironed I

DES C 0 IP T ION Ltr re our NRC request....t;rans the following:

lp ENCLOSURE Addi info re steam 'Generator'tube Integrity

..(40 cys e'ncl rec'd) 6p

~

PLANT NAMF:

Turkey Point jj3 & 4

)KKCZMM~

SAFETY ASSXGNED AD:

N PRO EC~TNAEA EEj LXC ASST c v

/0 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION PROJECT MANAGER'IC ASST A>>

~ ILE NRC PDR I&E OELD GOSSICK & STAFF MIPC CASE HANAUER HARLESS INTERNALD SYSTEMS SAFETY HEIhTEMAN SCHROEDER ENGINEERING MACARRY KNIGHT SIfSKIL PAWLICK REACTOR SAFE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BOYD ROSS NOVAK PE COLLINS HOUSTON ROSZTOCZY PETERSON CHECK MELTZ HELTEMES AT & I SKOVHOLT SALTZMAN RUTBERG EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION NAT LAB~

REG V IE LA PDR LPDR'SIC:

ASLB:

CONSULTANTS:

ACRE CYE iEKCTEC/ E T~A ISTRI BUTION PLANT SYSTEMS TEDES 0 IPPOL TO OPERATXNG REACTORS STELLO OPERATING TECH EXSENHUT

'B E

B ~$~

ULR KSON OR S TE SAFF, E

ERNST BALLARD SPANGLER SITE TECII GAMMILL STEPP HULMAN SXTE ANALYSIS VOLLMER BUNCH J ~ COLLINS KREGER CONTROL NUMBFR NRC FORM 196 <2.76)

.~

'I, - ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

o

~

~

Ieguiatory Docket. FI<A t P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 Q~l leer FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY January 21, 1977 L-77-30 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 53 Division of Operating Reactors U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 (g Ip

Dear Mr. Lear:

Re<

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Steam Generator Tube Xntegrity Su olemental'n'f oxma't'io'n'he attached information is submitted in response to a request.

from your staff.

Xt supplements previous information submitted in our letters L-76-432, L-76-434, and L-77-3.

Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/ms Attachment cc:

Norman C. Moseley, Region IX Robert Lowenstein, Esquire 01 oocxaco I/a g/

U 5. WCIg CORI Nol

'I RI'EOPLE...

SERVING PEOPLE

F

ATTACHMENT'urkey Point Units 3 and 4

Request for Information Steam Generator Tube Int'e rit Q13. Provide a tabulation summary of the total strains in the circumferential, longitudinal and radial direction at the U-bend apex for tubes at flow slot locations in rows 1 to 4.

The summary should. indicate the effects due to manufacturing, service induced. ovality (hourglassing),

change in U-bend radius, operating thermal and pressure loads and accident loads.

Also compute the effective strains at the U-bend apex.

Clarification of above question.

a.

Provide the requested tabulation for a total of 32 tubes (eight tubes adjacent to the flow slot in rows 1 through 4.)

b.

For the tubes in row 1 provide the requested tabulation for the following two cases.

(1)

Flow slot hourglassing based on current field data for the top support plate in Steam Gener-ator 4B (2)

Assuming full closure of the flow slot c.

For those tubes in rows 2, 3 and 4 provide the requested tabulation assuming full closure of the flow slot.

'13.

As indicated in our response to Question li the operating thermal.

and pressure strains are trivial,and can, be neglected.

Similarly, the strains due to =SSE and other accident loads are. quite small and are effectively zero when compared to those due to hourglassing.

Our table will onlv include manu-facturing and in-service (hourglassing)'. strains and a summation, for, each quantity requested.

The summation is inclusive of operating and accident conditions.

j

TABLE 1 ROLU 1 8 CURRENT HOURGLASSING (UNIT 4) axial

=hoo radial 6e u.

~

~

Mfg.

Column

.177

.004

.040

. 133 86 87 88 89 90 92 H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T

.014

.191

.013

.190

.012

.189

.010

.187

.007

. 184

.004

.121

.177

.177

.008

.012

.009

.013

.009

.013

.008

.012

.004

.008

.003

.007

.004

.004

.044

.004

.044

.004

.044

.003

.043

.002

.042

.001

.041

.040

. 141

., 140

. 140

. 138

. 137

. 134

.133

-133

  • No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains

s

TABLE 2 ROW 1 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.

I Column

. 177

.004

-.040 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T

.044

.221

.043

.220

.038

.215

.031

.208

.023

.200

.012

.189

.177

.177

.043

.047

. 043

.047

.039

.043

. 032

.036

.019

.023

. 009.

.013

.004

.004

.014

.054

.014

-.054

-.012

.052

-.010

.050

.007

.047

.004

.044

-. 040

.040

  • No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains

TABLE 3 ROW 2 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg I

Column

~axial

.112

.003

.030

~hop

< a

.085 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T

.022

.134

.022

.134

.021

.133

.018

.130

.013

.125

.008

.120

.112

.034

.037

.034

.037

.027

.030

.021

.024

.011

.014

.006

.009

    • PP3

.00

    • P04

. 007

.024

.054

.023

.053

.021

.051

.018

.048

.013

.043

-. 008

-.030

.030

.109

.108

.106

.104

.099

. 093

.085

.085

  • No Leg Displacement, H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains These strains result from dimensions taken from the removed tubes.

A possible explan-ation is that these tubes had higher ovality, as manufactured, than the statistical average.

~

~

TABLE 4 RON 3 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.

c I

Column axial

.082 hoo

.005

.020 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T H

T

.015

.097

.015

.097

.013

.095

.011

.093

.009

.091

.005

.087

.082

.018 23

.018

.023

.013

.013

.009

.014

.004

.009

.001

.006

.005

.024

-.044

-.023

-.043

-.021

>>.041

.017

.037

.012

.032

-.006

.026

.020

" No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains

4

TABLE 5 ROW 4 9 FULL CLOSURE axial hoo Mfg., s Column

.064

.002

.020 85 86 87 89

. H T

H T

H T

H T

.012

.076

.012

.076

.011

.075

.010

.074

.007

.014

.016

.014

.016

.011

.013

.007

.009

.003

.024

.044

.023

.043

.021

.041

.017

-.037

.012 90 91 H

T

.004

.068

. 064

.002

.004

.002

-.007

.027

.020 92

.064

.002

.020

  • No Leg Displacement H Strain due to hourglassing T - Total Strain

0

~

t.