ML19253A571: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
Line 22: Line 22:
                                               *b'        - :; :
                                               *b'        - :; :
(  ;
(  ;
           '[[}    _
           '((}    _
   \b}k (N  Q/
   \b}k (N  Q/
                 ]
                 ]

Revision as of 15:00, 16 March 2020

Forwards Three Technical Reviews of Des Including Reviews of Economic Analysis of alternatives,NUREG-0529,need for Plant, Cost - Benifit Summary & Environ Impacts of Plant Operation
ML19253A571
Person / Time
Site: New England Power
Issue date: 08/29/1979
From: Griscom C
RHODE ISLAND, UNIV. OF, KINGSTON, RI
To: Cota P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19253A572 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0529, RTR-NUREG-529 NUDOCS 7909100339
Download: ML19253A571 (1)


Text

, r

~

  • b' - :; :

(  ;

'((} _

\b}k (N Q/

]

August 29, 1979 Dr. Phillip C. Cota Environmental Projects Branch 1 Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatcry Commission Washington, DC Dear Dr. Cota Enclosed are three additional technical reviews of the Draft Environmental Matement on NEP 1 and 2. One of them, Dr. Hellman's, is to be substituted fo his draft of 26 June 1979.

As stated in Dr. Sean Kelleherr's letter and note of 3 August 1979, these amments,are to be considered provisional in nature, and should the NEP 1 and 2 application be reactivated, the State of Rhode Island will submit more extensive comments.

Yours truly

\ W Clement A. Criscom, Ph.D.

Technical Team Coordinator of the Govenor's Energy Office for the NEP 1 and 2 Review a

CAG/dap Enc: Review by:

Professor R. Hellman (final)

Professors A. Mead & G. Ramsey Dr. C. G .scom (Ch. 5) cc: Dante Ionato G.E.O.

I v

\

l c i , .~

790910033']).

'J