ML20004F897: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:$
{{#Wiki_filter:$
j'   '
j'
        'hk 2DLC-4114 M                                                                       - om 45s-e000 43$ SeNTA AWSRUS
''hk 2DLC-4114 M
            $7''*                                                                       June 23, 1981 I
- om 45s-e000 43$ SeNTA AWSRUS
i United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                 gg'N                     ,
$7''*
D d
June 23, 1981 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission gg'N d
Region.I.                                                                 f 631 Park Avenue                                                                     3-       %
D Region.I.
King of Prussia, PA 19405
f 631 Park Avenue 3-King of Prussia, PA 19405 (v g.
                                                                                  ~
~,7
(v g.       -
~
                                                                                                  -,   4
4
                                                                                                            ~,7
' ATTENTION:
          ' ATTENTION:           MR. BOYCE H. GRIER, DIRECTOR-                   g     g g gjggj > -8 u.s. NUCIAR RIGAMOU 'A
MR. BOYCE H. GRIER, DIRECTOR-g g g gjggj > -8 u.s. NUCIAR RIGAMOU
'A


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2                                 cominion     '/
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 cominion
                              ' Docket No. 50-412                                   \
'/
Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures Significant Deficiency Report'No. 80-07                   N      isi\'g Gentiemen :
' Docket No. 50-412
Enclosed is " Interim Report No. 2" on the above subject. If you have any questions concerning this report, we are available to meet with Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel at their convenience.
\\
Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures isi\\'g N
Significant Deficiency Report'No. 80-07 Gentiemen :
Enclosed is " Interim Report No. 2" on the above subject.
If you have any questions concerning this report, we are available to meet with Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel at their convenience.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By E. 3. Woolever VICE PRESIDENT
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By E. 3. Woolever VICE PRESIDENT
          -cc:       Mr. V. Stello, Director (15)
-cc:
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear itegulatory Commissiory Washing'.on, D. C. 20555 8106260 f                                   ,        _                                .
Mr. V. Stello, Director (15)
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear itegulatory Commissiory Washing'.on, D. C. 20555 8106260 f


{D .
{D.
J.
J.
t' Interim Report No. 2 90
t' Interim Report No. 2 90
                                        ' Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures at Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 i
' Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures at Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 i
1.0- Summary i
1.0- Summary i
A review of seismic calculations for the Auxiliary Building (Category I)'of Millstone Unit No. 3 has shown that the analysis used to design the portions of the structure _ transferring horizontal seismic forces
A review of seismic calculations for the Auxiliary Building (Category I)'of Millstone Unit No. 3 has shown that the analysis used to design the portions of the structure _ transferring horizontal seismic forces
:down through the structure to the mat was incomplete. Beaver Valley
:down through the structure to the mat was incomplete. Beaver Valley
                          . Power Station-Un it 2 has used similar design; methods for analysis of-
. Power Station-U it 2 has used similar design; methods for analysis of-n
                          .the following Category 'I Structures: Auxiliary Building, Control Room Extension and Valve Pit, Service Building, Main Steam and Cable Vault Area, Fuel and Decontamination Building, Safeguards Building, and the Diesel Generator Building.
.the following Category 'I Structures: Auxiliary Building, Control Room Extension and Valve Pit, Service Building, Main Steam and Cable Vault Area, Fuel and Decontamination Building, Safeguards Building, and the Diesel Generator Building.
2.0       ,Immediate Action Taken An initial review of the calculations of the above structures was performed and indicated that .there is no structural deficiency in the design of the structures resulting from the- transfer of horizontal seismic forces. The detailed review and completion of the Auxiliary Building, Diesel Generator Building, Safeguards Building and Service
2.0
                                                  ~
,Immediate Action Taken An initial review of the calculations of the above structures was performed and indicated that.there is no structural deficiency in the design of the structures resulting from the-transfer of horizontal seismic forces. The detailed review and completion of the Auxiliary Building, Diesel Generator Building, Safeguards Building and Service Building seismic calculations is finished and the structures have
Building seismic calculations is finished and the structures have been found adequate. The completion of such calculations for the other structures listed above has been initiated and is scheduled for completion by Decec5er 1981.
~
                  - 3.0       Description of Deficiency The analysis used to design the portions of the structure transferring horizontal seismic forces down through the structure to the mat was incomplete to the extent that the cumulative effect of the vertical force couple resisting flexure was not carried down through the i                             structure to the mat, although the analysis used to design the mat did consider this cumulative effect.
been found adequate. The completion of such calculations for the other structures listed above has been initiated and is scheduled for completion by Decec5er 1981.
4.0       Analysis of Safety Implications Analysis of safety implications will be provided in the final report.
- 3.0 Description of Deficiency The analysis used to design the portions of the structure transferring horizontal seismic forces down through the structure to the mat was incomplete to the extent that the cumulative effect of the vertical force couple resisting flexure was not carried down through the i
5.0       Corrective Action to Remedy Deficiency Pending the outcome of the detailed review of the seismic calculations of the Category I structures listed above, the calculations, drawings and any other design considerations will be corrected as required.
structure to the mat, although the analysis used to design the mat did consider this cumulative effect.
6.0         Additional Reports A. final report will be issued on December 1,1981.
4.0 Analysis of Safety Implications Analysis of safety implications will be provided in the final report.
i~r       , , -                g   ~w ,- ,    ,  ..ev.-   , , , , - - , ., , , - - , , , , a,.r-, ,,-in- , ,,n - , , ,~w.-, -a -,-}}
5.0 Corrective Action to Remedy Deficiency Pending the outcome of the detailed review of the seismic calculations of the Category I structures listed above, the calculations, drawings and any other design considerations will be corrected as required.
6.0 Additional Reports A. final report will be issued on December 1,1981.
i~r g
~w
..ev.-
a,.r-,
,,-in-
,,n
,~w.-,
-a
-,-}}

Latest revision as of 11:23, 23 December 2024

Second Interim Deficiency Rept 80-07 Re Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures.Calculations,Drawings & Other Design Considerations Will Be Corrected as Required.Final Rept Will Be Provided by 811201
ML20004F897
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 06/23/1981
From: Woolever E
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
2DLC-4114, NUDOCS 8106260143
Download: ML20004F897 (2)


Text

$

j'

hk 2DLC-4114 M

- om 45s-e000 43$ SeNTA AWSRUS

$7*

June 23, 1981 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission gg'N d

D Region.I.

f 631 Park Avenue 3-King of Prussia, PA 19405 (v g.

~,7

~

4

' ATTENTION:

MR. BOYCE H. GRIER, DIRECTOR-g g g gjggj > -8 u.s. NUCIAR RIGAMOU

'A

SUBJECT:

Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 cominion

'/

' Docket No. 50-412

\\

Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures isi\\'g N

Significant Deficiency Report'No. 80-07 Gentiemen :

Enclosed is " Interim Report No. 2" on the above subject.

If you have any questions concerning this report, we are available to meet with Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel at their convenience.

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By E. 3. Woolever VICE PRESIDENT

-cc:

Mr. V. Stello, Director (15)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear itegulatory Commissiory Washing'.on, D. C. 20555 8106260 f

{D.

J.

t' Interim Report No. 2 90

' Seismic Calculations for Category I Structures at Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 i

1.0- Summary i

A review of seismic calculations for the Auxiliary Building (Category I)'of Millstone Unit No. 3 has shown that the analysis used to design the portions of the structure _ transferring horizontal seismic forces

down through the structure to the mat was incomplete. Beaver Valley

. Power Station-U it 2 has used similar design; methods for analysis of-n

.the following Category 'I Structures: Auxiliary Building, Control Room Extension and Valve Pit, Service Building, Main Steam and Cable Vault Area, Fuel and Decontamination Building, Safeguards Building, and the Diesel Generator Building.

2.0

,Immediate Action Taken An initial review of the calculations of the above structures was performed and indicated that.there is no structural deficiency in the design of the structures resulting from the-transfer of horizontal seismic forces. The detailed review and completion of the Auxiliary Building, Diesel Generator Building, Safeguards Building and Service Building seismic calculations is finished and the structures have

~

been found adequate. The completion of such calculations for the other structures listed above has been initiated and is scheduled for completion by Decec5er 1981.

- 3.0 Description of Deficiency The analysis used to design the portions of the structure transferring horizontal seismic forces down through the structure to the mat was incomplete to the extent that the cumulative effect of the vertical force couple resisting flexure was not carried down through the i

structure to the mat, although the analysis used to design the mat did consider this cumulative effect.

4.0 Analysis of Safety Implications Analysis of safety implications will be provided in the final report.

5.0 Corrective Action to Remedy Deficiency Pending the outcome of the detailed review of the seismic calculations of the Category I structures listed above, the calculations, drawings and any other design considerations will be corrected as required.

6.0 Additional Reports A. final report will be issued on December 1,1981.

i~r g

~w

..ev.-

a,.r-,

,,-in-

,,n

,~w.-,

-a

-,-