ML19322B906: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
wLth tha' Unit 3 ono-inch control rod d ri ve insert and' withdraw piping l outside o f primary containrant which ara not seismic,Ity qualified. ! | wLth tha' Unit 3 ono-inch control rod d ri ve insert and' withdraw piping l outside o f primary containrant which ara not seismic,Ity qualified. ! | ||
Subsequent an a ly.1 t n o f hangers inside primary containment on Unit 3 nssociated with the same control rod dri ve piping linen indicates that one member o f aach of eight hangers would b* overstressed in the event of a Design Basis Harthquake. I e | Subsequent an a ly.1 t n o f hangers inside primary containment on Unit 3 nssociated with the same control rod dri ve piping linen indicates that one member o f aach of eight hangers would b* overstressed in the event of a Design Basis Harthquake. I e | ||
Apparent Cause of Occurrence: I. | Apparent Cause of Occurrence: I. | ||
Engineering design deficiency. ; | Engineering design deficiency. ; | ||
I | I Analysis of Occurrance : ; | ||
Analysis of Occurrance : ; | |||
An engineering review of vendor design of seismic supports associated with small piping has revealed that four hangers outsLde primary containment on Unit 3 may not be capable of withstanding a seismic ' | An engineering review of vendor design of seismic supports associated with small piping has revealed that four hangers outsLde primary containment on Unit 3 may not be capable of withstanding a seismic ' | ||
ovont. Additional analysis by the architect-engineer has indicated that one member of each of eight hangers inside primary containment escociated with the above control rod drive piping wonid be overstressed in the case of a Design Hasts Earthquake (DBE). Postulating the DBB,- | ovont. Additional analysis by the architect-engineer has indicated that one member of each of eight hangers inside primary containment escociated with the above control rod drive piping wonid be overstressed in the case of a Design Hasts Earthquake (DBE). Postulating the DBB,- | ||
| Line 38: | Line 35: | ||
cr withdrawal line would break under a seismic event. ] | cr withdrawal line would break under a seismic event. ] | ||
; | ; | ||
7 9 1 2 1 8 6 I /./ / Q l | |||
7 9 1 2 1 8 6 I /./ / Q | |||
l | |||
--___m...._ | --___m...._ | ||
- - - l | - - - l | ||
| Line 58: | Line 44: | ||
F .s i l u r e to lin p l e rn en t corractiwa tvtion for the above four hangars | F .s i l u r e to lin p l e rn en t corractiwa tvtion for the above four hangars | ||
( o u t.s i d a of c o n t a i n ne n t. ) within soven days of th- ocenre nee d ri t e will re qtti re Unit 3 to be placed in tha c o l ei s it ti t d own condition (refarenen letter from R. li . Cri o r. | ( o u t.s i d a of c o n t a i n ne n t. ) within soven days of th- ocenre nee d ri t e will re qtti re Unit 3 to be placed in tha c o l ei s it ti t d own condition (refarenen letter from R. li . Cri o r. | ||
S. 1. . D rt i t r o f f . Vlee P r e g l .la n t.. f)ivattur. N ii C . ,l e g i. o n 1, to | S. 1. . D rt i t r o f f . Vlee P r e g l .la n t.. f)ivattur. N ii C . ,l e g i. o n 1, to 1979). ill e c t. r i c Production. d.itad October 21, 81o d i .t'1 c a t i on s to thn a l .u, h t seismic supports inside of contain-nont 12-7-79. will be comp l e teil <lu r i n g tit o Unit 3 outa2e vehedialed to begin P r e v i o u r; Failures: | ||
1979). ill e c t. r i c Production. d.itad October 21, 81o d i .t'1 c a t i on s to thn a l .u, h t seismic supports inside of contain-nont 12-7-79. will be comp l e teil <lu r i n g tit o Unit 3 outa2e vehedialed to begin P r e v i o u r; Failures: | |||
'7 79 r,3/tp 3_ 7 9_ g 9,i : g.. | '7 79 r,3/tp 3_ 7 9_ g 9,i : g.. | ||
2 -7:1 - 3 ". / 1 P i.7c-21/1P 2 - 7 0 - 4 i f 1.' 3 - 7 o - 2 .t / t r-2-70-40/ P T-7'a-2t./i;' | 2 -7:1 - 3 ". / 1 P i.7c-21/1P 2 - 7 0 - 4 i f 1.' 3 - 7 o - 2 .t / t r-2-70-40/ P T-7'a-2t./i;' | ||
2-79-50/19 3 - 7 9 - 2 '.1/ 1 P gTC D 3-79-30/1P OO 3 79-Tt/IP O Q | 2-79-50/19 3 - 7 9 - 2 '.1/ 1 P gTC D 3-79-30/1P OO 3 79-Tt/IP O Q | ||
3-79-32/IP 9 g }( A w s A .J Very truly yours. | |||
3-79-32/IP 9 g }( A w s A .J | |||
Very truly yours. | |||
W. T. Ullrich Station Superintendent WTU:lla | W. T. Ullrich Station Superintendent WTU:lla | ||
; | ; | ||
A I | A I | ||
1 3 | 1 3 | ||
= | = | ||
1 l | 1 l | ||
l 1 | l 1 | ||
1}} | 1}} | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 1 February 2020
| ML19322B906 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1979 |
| From: | Ullrich W PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912130417 | |
| Download: ML19322B906 (2) | |
Text
,- .
Pa : a u sis.Pb : s r urr 9 r r r mw a n y P .. a ,, a . , r. . . . . ., a. .. . o ,. o r ;e .i t i ; a a .. t c. :. . .a.- , es a i ;
1771.4 Decemoer 4, 1979 Mr. Boycn 11 . Grier Office of In.,poc t ton and Enforcement j C' #3 D
Region t United States Nucient Regulatory Commission LD 'R t, 31 P,rk Avanne o D q it King of P russia , PA 1940o A w . L~ - A Q SUDJECT: DEPORTABLE O C C U R R T.N C F. - PROMPT NOTIFICATION - UPDATE Cor(ir-ing tha n o t t e' 3 catlan afHe. (;r a n ti ma n . 4..gion T. United States
'uclear angu lato ry Co=mi s s i on on December 4
. L 9 P2 Reforanca: Onckat No. 5 0 - 2 .* n Peach Doitom Unit 3 Technical S p e c t .t' L e a t i o n Re ferenc e . 6. 9. 2. A (9 )
l Report No. 3-79-39/IP (Update) l Occurrance Date: November 30, 1979 Ifpda t e : December 4, 1979 !
Identification of Occurrence: ,
Initial prompt nortfication conearnad Four selsmic =nsports associnted .
wLth tha' Unit 3 ono-inch control rod d ri ve insert and' withdraw piping l outside o f primary containrant which ara not seismic,Ity qualified. !
Subsequent an a ly.1 t n o f hangers inside primary containment on Unit 3 nssociated with the same control rod dri ve piping linen indicates that one member o f aach of eight hangers would b* overstressed in the event of a Design Basis Harthquake. I e
Apparent Cause of Occurrence: I.
Engineering design deficiency. ;
I Analysis of Occurrance : ;
An engineering review of vendor design of seismic supports associated with small piping has revealed that four hangers outsLde primary containment on Unit 3 may not be capable of withstanding a seismic '
ovont. Additional analysis by the architect-engineer has indicated that one member of each of eight hangers inside primary containment escociated with the above control rod drive piping wonid be overstressed in the case of a Design Hasts Earthquake (DBE). Postulating the DBB,-
failure of these hangers and subsequent failure of the supporting piping would not prevent the control rods from scramming. Additionally, our review of the control rod drive system design related to seismic inadequacies for certain hangers indicates that no drive insert and/
cr withdrawal line would break under a seismic event. ]
7 9 1 2 1 8 6 I /./ / Q l
--___m...._
- - - l
. l l
4 .
. ,..... ~ ; .. . 4 ,. ,, ,
F .s i l u r e to lin p l e rn en t corractiwa tvtion for the above four hangars
( o u t.s i d a of c o n t a i n ne n t. ) within soven days of th- ocenre nee d ri t e will re qtti re Unit 3 to be placed in tha c o l ei s it ti t d own condition (refarenen letter from R. li . Cri o r.
S. 1. . D rt i t r o f f . Vlee P r e g l .la n t.. f)ivattur. N ii C . ,l e g i. o n 1, to 1979). ill e c t. r i c Production. d.itad October 21, 81o d i .t'1 c a t i on s to thn a l .u, h t seismic supports inside of contain-nont 12-7-79. will be comp l e teil <lu r i n g tit o Unit 3 outa2e vehedialed to begin P r e v i o u r; Failures:
'7 79 r,3/tp 3_ 7 9_ g 9,i : g..
2 -7:1 - 3 ". / 1 P i.7c-21/1P 2 - 7 0 - 4 i f 1.' 3 - 7 o - 2 .t / t r-2-70-40/ P T-7'a-2t./i;'
2-79-50/19 3 - 7 9 - 2 '.1/ 1 P gTC D 3-79-30/1P OO 3 79-Tt/IP O Q
3-79-32/IP 9 g }( A w s A .J Very truly yours.
W. T. Ullrich Station Superintendent WTU:lla
A I
1 3
=
1 l
l 1
1