ML11221A352: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:50 51 '52 53   54         57                                         POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED 750 (E) 750                                                        7              ON I . 5 O/t   CRITERIA (INCHES)
{{#Wiki_filter:750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 50 51  
POTENTIAL ON 6 % 6 SETTLEMENT          BASED CRITERIA (INCHES) -
'52 53 54 57 I
DESIGN WATER TABLE 740                                                          740 1
I 1
                                                                    -!E WATER TABLE       (24.HR)
I I
MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT 730
I 1
                                  -1                        730 POTENTI ALLY L IQUEFIA BLE SO IL (SEE NOTE)
A-A
                                    /CCLASS "A" BACK ILL
-1
                                                                    -WS WEATHER1ED SHALE i
/CCLASS "A" BACK AUX BLOG PIPE TUNNEL-UNIT i ILL 7 750 1 740 730 i 720 710 700 690 1
720                                    AUX BLOG                NOTE:
680 670 660 POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON I. 5 O/t CRITERIA (INCHES)
PIPE TUNNEL-        720 I . LtQ~EFACT~ONBASED ON TOP OF GROUND
(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6 % 6 CRITERIA (INCHES) -
                                  --  UNIT i                      ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED IDRtSS   -
DESIGN WATER TABLE  
(1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS.
-!E WATER TABLE (24.
710                                                      -  710 700                                                      - 700 690                                                          690 1
HR)
680                                                          680            Added by Amendment 50 670                                                          670 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT ERCW PIPELINE 1
MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT POTENT I ALLY L I QUEF IA BLE SO I L (SEE NOTE)  
SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571 660    I  I  1    I I    I    1 660 A-A
-WS WEATHER1ED SHALE NOTE:
                ,}}
I. LtQ~EFACT~ON BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED - IDRtSS (1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS.
Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT 1 ERCW PIPELINE SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571  
,}}

Latest revision as of 04:52, 13 January 2025

Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-571, ERCW Pipeline Section A-A, Sheet 4 of 4
ML11221A352
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2010
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML11221A352 (1)


Text

750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 50 51

'52 53 54 57 I

I 1

I I

I 1

A-A

-1

/CCLASS "A" BACK AUX BLOG PIPE TUNNEL-UNIT i ILL 7 750 1 740 730 i 720 710 700 690 1

680 670 660 POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON I. 5 O/t CRITERIA (INCHES)

(E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6 % 6 CRITERIA (INCHES) -

DESIGN WATER TABLE

-!E WATER TABLE (24.

HR)

MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 BLOW COUNT POTENT I ALLY L I QUEF IA BLE SO I L (SEE NOTE)

-WS WEATHER1ED SHALE NOTE:

I. LtQ~EFACT~ON BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCEtlERATlON OF 0.49 AND SEED - IDRtSS (1971) CORRELATION FOR SANDS.

Added by Amendment 50 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT 1 ERCW PIPELINE SECTION A-A SREET 4 OF 4 FIGURE 2.5-571

,