ML022480312: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CONFIDENTIAL
{{#Wiki_filter:CONFIDENTIAL
UNITED STATES
                                          UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
                OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001
                                  WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001
August 19, 2002
                                            August 19, 2002
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2002-12E  
                NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2002-12E
CATEGORY I FUEL FACILITIES
                              CATEGORY I FUEL FACILITIES
NRC THREAT ADVISORY AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES SYSTEM
    NRC THREAT ADVISORY AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES SYSTEM
ADDRESSEES
ADDRESSEES
All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Category I Fuel Facilities
All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Category I Fuel Facilities
INTENT The NRC is issuing this Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) to inform addressees of changes to
INTENT
The NRC is issuing this Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) to inform addressees of changes to
the descriptions of the various threat advisory conditions and provide guidance that addressees
the descriptions of the various threat advisory conditions and provide guidance that addressees
may use in preplanning graded protective measures to respond to changes in the threat
may use in preplanning graded protective measures to respond to changes in the threat
 
environment. This RIS supersedes Information Notice 98-35, Threat Assessments and
environment. This RIS supersedes Information Notice 98-35, "Threat Assessments and
Consideration of Heightened Physical Protection Measures (dated September 4, 1998).1 It is
 
noted that a RIS is generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of
Consideration of Heightened Physical Protection Measures" (dated September 4, 1998).
matters for which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC
1 It is noted that a RIS is generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of
considers appropriate at each threat level. In the interest of expediency, the Commission has
 
matters for which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC
 
considers appropriate at each threat level. In the interest of expediency, the Commission has
 
determined that issuance of this RIS is the most efficient mechanism to align the Office of
determined that issuance of this RIS is the most efficient mechanism to align the Office of
 
Homeland Security, NRC, and licensee expectations with respect to licensees response to
Homeland Security, NRC, and licensee expectations
with respect to licensees' response to
threat advisories.
threat advisories.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Office of Homeland Security (OHS) has  
The Office of Homeland Security (OHS) has developed a Homeland Security Advisory System
developed a Homeland Security Advisory System (HSAS) to provide a comprehensive and effective  
(HSAS) to provide a comprehensive and effective system to disseminate information regarding
system to disseminate information regarding  
the risk of terrorist attacks to Federal, State, and local authorities and the public. The HSAS
the risk of terrorist attacks to Federal, State, and local authorities and the public. The HSAS
implements Homeland Security Presidential Directive 3 (HSPD-3), March 11, 2002. This new
 
                                                        Upon Removal of Enclosure 2
implements Homeland Security Presidential Directive 3 (HSPD-3), March 11, 2002. This new
                                                        this Document is DECONTROLLED/
Upon Removal of Enclosure 2
                                                        UNCLASSIFIED
this Document is DECONTROLLED/
        1
          Because of its classification as Safeguards Information, NRC restricted distribution of
Information Notice 98-35 to certain classes of licensees.
                                          CONFIDENTIAL


UNCLASSIFIED
                                            CONFIDENTIAL                           RIS 2002-12E
1 Because of its classification as Safeguards Information, NRC restricted distribution of
                                                                                  Page 2 of 5
Information Notice 98-35 to certain classes of licensees.
CONFIDENTIAL  
CONFIDENTIAL
RIS 2002-12E
Page 2 of 5
system includes five color-coded threat conditions with a description of corresponding actions at
system includes five color-coded threat conditions with a description of corresponding actions at
each level. These conditions are:
each level. These conditions are:
!Green (Low Condition) Low risk of terrorist attack
        !       Green (Low Condition)           Low risk of terrorist attack
!Blue (Guarded Condition) General risk of terrorist attack
        !       Blue (Guarded Condition)       General risk of terrorist attack
!Yellow (Elevated Condition) Significant risk of terrorist attack
        !       Yellow (Elevated Condition)     Significant risk of terrorist attack
!Orange (High Condition) High risk of terrorist attack
        !       Orange (High Condition)       High risk of terrorist attack
!Red (Severe Condition) Severe risk of terrorist attack
        !       Red (Severe Condition)         Severe risk of terrorist attack
DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
The HSAS provides a consistent national fram
The HSAS provides a consistent national framework for allowing government officials and
ework for allowing government officials and
citizens to communicate the nature and degree of terrorist threats. The advisory system
citizens to communicate the nature and degree of terrorist threats. The advisory system
 
characterizes appropriate levels of vigilance, preparedness, and readiness for each threat
characterizes appropriate levels of vigilance, preparedness, and readiness for each threat
condition and describes associated actions that should be taken to counter and respond to
condition and describes associated actions that should be taken to counter and respond to
terrorist activities.
terrorist activities.
In declaring threat conditions, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Assistant to the
In declaring threat conditions, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Assistant to the
President for Homeland Security will consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:
President for Homeland Security will consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:
!To what degree is the threat information credible?
        !       To what degree is the threat information credible?
!To what degree is the threat information corroborated?
        !       To what degree is the threat information corroborated?
!To what degree is the threat specific and/or imminent?
        !       To what degree is the threat specific and/or imminent?
!How grave are the potential consequences of the threat?
        !       How grave are the potential consequences of the threat?
!To what degree is the target vulnerable to the threat?
        !       To what degree is the target vulnerable to the threat?
HSAS advisories regarding threat conditions may be declared for the entire nation or for a
HSAS advisories regarding threat conditions may be declared for the entire nation or for a
specific geographical area, or functional or industrial sector, and will be sent to local, State, and
specific geographical area, or functional or industrial sector, and will be sent to local, State, and
 
Federal government agencies as appropriate. In general, the threat conditions escalate as the
Federal government agencies as appropriate. In general, the threat conditions escalate as the
 
likelihood or imminence of an attack increases.
likelihood or imminence of an attack increases.
Although the threat condition will be determined by the Attorney General, the NRC has the
Although the threat condition will be determined by the Attorney General, the NRC has the
obligation under HSPD-3 to establish the appropriate protective measures.   In addition, the
obligation under HSPD-3 to establish the appropriate protective measures. In addition, the
 
NRC has the obligation to respond to risks, threats, incidents, and events at NRC-regulated
NRC has the obligation to respond to risks, threats, incidents, and events at NRC-regulated
facilities, or involving NRC-regulated materials.
facilities, or involving NRC-regulated materials.
Upon a declaration of an HSAS threat condition, the NRC will promptly notify affected licensees
Upon a declaration of an HSAS threat condition, the NRC will promptly notify affected licensees
of the threat condition and of the appropriate protective measures. In addition, the NRC may
of the threat condition and of the appropriate protective measures. In addition, the NRC may
 
find it appropriate to notify affected licensees to establish certain protective measures in the
find it appropriate to notify affected licensees to establish certain protective measures in the
 
absence of an HSAS declaration. The NRC could take such a step, for example, to respond to
absence of an HSAS declaration. The NRC could take such a step, for example, to respond to
an emergency or a site-specific situation.
 
an emergency or a site-specific situation.
The NRC is using this RIS to announce its threat advisory and protective measures system to
The NRC is using this RIS to announce its threat advisory and protective measures system to
implement the HSAS for Category I fuel facilities. The NRC will relay information relating to the
implement the HSAS for Category I fuel facilities. The NRC will relay information relating to the
 
threat conditions using the color-coded system defined by the HSAS. The NRC has also
threat conditions using the color-coded system defined by the HSAS. The NRC has also
 
defined protective measures in five levels, which generally correlate with the five color-coded
defined protective measures in five levels, which generally correlate with the five color-coded
conditions of the HSAS. Protective measures at each level build upon the actions defined in the
                                            CONFIDENTIAL


conditions of the HSAS.  Protective measures at each level build upon the actions defined in the
                                          CONFIDENTIAL                       RIS 2002-12E
CONFIDENTIAL  
                                                                              Page 3 of 5
CONFIDENTIAL
lower levels. For example, measures at level III will include those measures taken at levels I
RIS 2002-12E
and II.
Page 3 of 5
        !     The level I (Low) protective measures, which generally correspond to the green
lower levels. For example, measures at level III will include those measures taken at levels I
              threat condition, are considered to be the routine level of operation and are
and II.!The level I (Low) protective measures, which generally correspond to the green
              satisfied by licensees maintaining the security programs required by the
threat condition, are considered to be the routine level of operation and are
              regulations, individual licenses, and Orders. Measures to enhance security need
 
              to be available so that they can be readied or implemented in higher threat
satisfied by licensees maintaining the security programs required by the
              conditions when called upon.
 
        !     The level II (Guarded) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
regulations, individual licenses, and Orders. Measures to enhance security need
              blue threat condition, warrant more action by the licensees, but will generally not
 
              involve significant action beyond the routine level of operation. These actions
to be available so that they can be readied or implemented in higher threat
              would typically relate to readiness, e.g., notifying personnel to standby, or
 
              bringing in additional security officers to prepare for an enhanced response.
conditions when called upon.  
              Actions taken at level II will include those taken at level I.
!The level II (Guarded) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
        !      The level III (Elevated) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
blue threat condition, warrant more action by the licensees, but will generally not
              yellow threat condition, warrant enhanced security measures and additional
 
              resources, perhaps on a sustained basis, but would be based on hardware and
involve significant action beyond the routine level of operation. These actions
              personnel already at the licensees disposal. (Note: When the HSAS was first
 
              announced on March 12, 2002, OHS also announced that the country was then
would typically relate to readiness, e.g., notifying personnel to standby, or
              considered to be in a Yellow threat condition.) Actions taken at level III will
              include those taken at levels I and II.
        !      The level IV (High) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
              orange threat condition, assume that the licensees security organization is at its
              highest sustainable level and that the licensee will request augmentation by local
              and State, and possibly Federal, resources to provide additional defensive
              capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available. (Note: NRC
              advisories will provide additional specific information to the licensee(s) as
              information about the threat develops. Any additional licensee actions will be
              based upon threat specific information). Actions taken at level IV will include
              those taken at levels I, II, and III.
        !      The level V (Severe) protective measures, which generally correspond to the red
              threat condition, assume that the licensee will request augmentation by Federal
              resources beyond State and local resources to provide additional defensive
              capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available to enhance the
              security of the facility. NRC will facilitate implementation of this added Federal
              presence. (Note: It is expected that this condition will be limited to one or a very
              small number of licensees for a limited period of time. Any additional specific
              actions will be based on an ongoing assessment of the threat by the NRC and
              other Federal agencies.) Actions taken at level V will include those taken at
              levels I, II, III, and IV.
                                          CONFIDENTIAL


bringing in additional security officers to prepare for an enhanced response.
                                            CONFIDENTIAL                         RIS 2002-12E
 
                                                                                  Page 4 of 5
Actions taken at level II will include those taken at level I.
!The level III (Elevated) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
yellow threat condition, warrant enhanced security measures and additional
 
resources, perhaps on a sustained basis, but would be based on hardware and
 
personnel already at the licensee's disposal.  (Note:  When the HSAS was first
 
announced on March 12, 2002, OHS also announced that the country was then
 
considered to be in a Yellow threat condition.)  Actions taken at level III will
 
include those taken at levels I and II.
!The level IV (High) protective measures, which generally correspond to the
orange threat condition, assume that the licensee's security organization is at its
 
highest sustainable level and that the licensee will request augmentation by local
 
and State, and possibly Federal, resources to provide additional defensive
 
capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available.  (Note: NRC
 
advisories will provide additional specific information to the licensee(s) as
 
information about the threat develops.  Any additional licensee actions will be
 
based upon threat specific information).  Actions taken at level IV will include
 
those taken at levels I, II, and III.
!The level V (Severe) protective measures, which generally correspond to the red
threat condition, assume that the licensee will request augmentation by Federal
 
resources beyond State and local resources to provide additional defensive
 
capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available to enhance the
 
security of the facility.  NRC will facilitate implementation of this added Federal
 
presence.  (Note: It is expected that this condition will be limited to one or a very
 
small number of licensees for a limited period of time.  Any additional specific
 
actions will be based on an ongoing assessment of the threat by the NRC and
 
other Federal agencies.)  Actions taken at level V will include those taken at
 
levels I, II, III, and IV.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
RIS 2002-12E
Page 4 of 5
When the Attorney General of the United States makes a change in threat condition that affects
When the Attorney General of the United States makes a change in threat condition that affects
NRC licensees, the NRC will issue a threat advisory notifying its licensees of the change. The
NRC licensees, the NRC will issue a threat advisory notifying its licensees of the change. The
 
NRC will refer licensees to the recommended protective measures outlined in the table attached
NRC will refer licensees to the recommended protective measures outlined in the table attached
 
to this RIS. Regardless of the current threat condition, licensees are required to comply with
to this RIS. Regardless of the current threat condition, licensees are required to comply with
existing regulations, licenses, and Orders. The table is designed to provide a clear description
 
of the basic actions appropriate to achieve the desired level of protection. The NRC may tailor
existing regulations, licenses, and Orders. The table is designed to provide a clear description
 
of the basic actions appropriate to achieve the desired level of protection. The NRC may tailor
 
the protective measures to be implemented based on the nature of the threat, including specific
the protective measures to be implemented based on the nature of the threat, including specific
instructions regarding protection against a specific mode of attack.
instructions regarding protection against a specific mode of attack.
In some cases, the circumstances of a particular threat may warrant that additional security
In some cases, the circumstances of a particular threat may warrant that additional security
measures be implemented beyond those provided in
measures be implemented beyond those provided in the attached table. For example, such
the attached table. For example, such
additional measures may be necessary depending upon the type of licensee affected, the
additional measures may be necessary depending upon the type of licensee affected, the
safeguards risks associated with various licensed activities, the specific vulnerabilities at a given
safeguards risks associated with various licensed activities, the specific vulnerabilities at a given
 
site, the suspected mode of attack, and the likelihood and nature of the threat. Although most
site, the suspected mode of attack, and the likelihood and nature of the threat. Although most
 
terrorist attacks occur without specific warning, whenever possible, the NRC will provide
terrorist attacks occur without specific warning, whenever possible, the NRC will provide
information about the nature and projected time frame of the threat.
information about the nature and projected time frame of the threat.
The protective measures in the attached table are assigned to particular threat levels, reflecting
The protective measures in the attached table are assigned to particular threat levels, reflecting
the seriousness of the threat and the need for timely action to address the threat. Therefore,
the seriousness of the threat and the need for timely action to address the threat. Therefore,
prompt implementation of the measures is essentia
prompt implementation of the measures is essential if the steps are to be effective in protecting
l if the steps are to be effective in protecting
the facility.
the facility.
The Commission may need to direct additional measures to deal with a fast-moving situation in
The Commission may need to direct additional measures to deal with a fast-moving situation in
the transition period before a formal declaration of a threat escalation by the Attorney General.  
the transition period before a formal declaration of a threat escalation by the Attorney General.
 
HSPD-3 makes clear that agency heads retain the authority to respond, as necessary, to risks,
HSPD-3 makes clear that agency heads "retain the authority to respond, as necessary, to risks,
threats, incidents, or events at facilities within the specific jurisdiction of their department or
threats, incidents, or events at facilities within the specific jurisdiction of their department or
agency. In these cases, the NRC threat advisory will include additional specific guidance
 
agency.In these cases, the NRC threat advisory will include additional specific guidance
 
beyond what is generically prescribed in the tables for a particular threat level.
beyond what is generically prescribed in the tables for a particular threat level.
NRC will update the table enclosed with this RIS as necessary to reflect changes in protective
NRC will update the table enclosed with this RIS as necessary to reflect changes in protective
measures for various threat levels and to reflect results from its ongoing comprehensive review
measures for various threat levels and to reflect results from its ongoing comprehensive review
 
of security matters. In addition, this RIS will be reviewed at least once a year and revised as
of security matters. In addition, this RIS will be reviewed at least once a year and revised as
 
necessary consistent with requirements to report changes to the Office of Homeland Security by
necessary consistent with requirements to report changes to the Office of Homeland Security by
 
August 1 of each year. Licensees seeking to provide input to the RIS and possible revisions
August 1 of each year. Licensees seeking to provide input to the RIS and possible revisions
 
should forward comments to the contact listed below.
should forward comments to the contact listed below.
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
RISs are generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of matters for
RISs are generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of matters for
which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC considers
which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC considers
 
appropriate at each threat level, but these actions are not requirements. A backfit analysis has
appropriate at each threat level, but these actions are not requirements. A backfit analysis has
 
not been performed.
not been performed.
CONFIDENTIAL  
                                            CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
RIS 2002-12E
Page 5 of 5
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment was not published in the
Federal Register
because this RIS is informational.  The Commission also plans to issue additional Regulatory Issue
 
Summaries in this series to cover additional
classes of licensees, or NRC-licensed activities, as
NRC's review progresses.  Any specific comments should be forwarded to the contact listed


below.PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
                                        CONFIDENTIAL                        RIS 2002-12E
                                                                            Page 5 of 5
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment was not published in the Federal Register because
this RIS is informational. The Commission also plans to issue additional Regulatory Issue
Summaries in this series to cover additional classes of licensees, or NRC-licensed activities, as
NRCs review progresses. Any specific comments should be forwarded to the contact listed
below.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This RIS does not request any information collection; therefore, this RIS is not subject to the
This RIS does not request any information collection; therefore, this RIS is not subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
If you have any questions about this matter, please telephone or e-mail the technical contact
If you have any questions about this matter, please telephone or e-mail the technical contact
listed below.
listed below.
R/A Daniel M. Gillen for
                                            R/A Daniel M. Gillen for
Robert C. Pierson, Director
                                            Robert C. Pierson, Director
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards
                                            Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards
 
                                            Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and SafeguardsContact:Andrew Rayland, NSIR/DNS
Contact:       Andrew Rayland, NSIR/DNS
(301) 415-8102
                (301) 415-8102
 
                E-mail: adr@nrc.gov
E-mail: adr@nrc.govEnclosures:(1) HSPD-3, Homeland Security Advisory System
Enclosures:     (1) HSPD-3, Homeland Security Advisory System
(2) Threat Conditions and Specific Actions for Category I Fuel Facilities
                (2) Threat Conditions and Specific Actions for Category I Fuel Facilities
CONFIDENTIAL
                                        CONFIDENTIAL
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 05:12, 24 November 2019

Category I Fuel Facilities - NRC Threat Advisory and Protective Measures System
ML022480312
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/19/2002
From: Pierson R
NRC/NMSS/FCSS
To:
Guilen D
References
IN-98-035 RIS-02-012E
Download: ML022480312 (7)


See also: RIS 2002-12E

Text

CONFIDENTIAL

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001

August 19, 2002

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2002-12E

CATEGORY I FUEL FACILITIES

NRC THREAT ADVISORY AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES SYSTEM

ADDRESSEES

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Category I Fuel Facilities

INTENT

The NRC is issuing this Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) to inform addressees of changes to

the descriptions of the various threat advisory conditions and provide guidance that addressees

may use in preplanning graded protective measures to respond to changes in the threat

environment. This RIS supersedes Information Notice 98-35, Threat Assessments and

Consideration of Heightened Physical Protection Measures (dated September 4, 1998).1 It is

noted that a RIS is generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of

matters for which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC

considers appropriate at each threat level. In the interest of expediency, the Commission has

determined that issuance of this RIS is the most efficient mechanism to align the Office of

Homeland Security, NRC, and licensee expectations with respect to licensees response to

threat advisories.

BACKGROUND

The Office of Homeland Security (OHS) has developed a Homeland Security Advisory System

(HSAS) to provide a comprehensive and effective system to disseminate information regarding

the risk of terrorist attacks to Federal, State, and local authorities and the public. The HSAS

implements Homeland Security Presidential Directive 3 (HSPD-3), March 11, 2002. This new

Upon Removal of Enclosure 2

this Document is DECONTROLLED/

UNCLASSIFIED

1

Because of its classification as Safeguards Information, NRC restricted distribution of

Information Notice 98-35 to certain classes of licensees.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL RIS 2002-12E

Page 2 of 5

system includes five color-coded threat conditions with a description of corresponding actions at

each level. These conditions are:

! Green (Low Condition) Low risk of terrorist attack

! Blue (Guarded Condition) General risk of terrorist attack

! Yellow (Elevated Condition) Significant risk of terrorist attack

! Orange (High Condition) High risk of terrorist attack

! Red (Severe Condition) Severe risk of terrorist attack

DISCUSSION

The HSAS provides a consistent national framework for allowing government officials and

citizens to communicate the nature and degree of terrorist threats. The advisory system

characterizes appropriate levels of vigilance, preparedness, and readiness for each threat

condition and describes associated actions that should be taken to counter and respond to

terrorist activities.

In declaring threat conditions, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Assistant to the

President for Homeland Security will consider, but not be limited to, the following factors:

! To what degree is the threat information credible?

! To what degree is the threat information corroborated?

! To what degree is the threat specific and/or imminent?

! How grave are the potential consequences of the threat?

! To what degree is the target vulnerable to the threat?

HSAS advisories regarding threat conditions may be declared for the entire nation or for a

specific geographical area, or functional or industrial sector, and will be sent to local, State, and

Federal government agencies as appropriate. In general, the threat conditions escalate as the

likelihood or imminence of an attack increases.

Although the threat condition will be determined by the Attorney General, the NRC has the

obligation under HSPD-3 to establish the appropriate protective measures. In addition, the

NRC has the obligation to respond to risks, threats, incidents, and events at NRC-regulated

facilities, or involving NRC-regulated materials.

Upon a declaration of an HSAS threat condition, the NRC will promptly notify affected licensees

of the threat condition and of the appropriate protective measures. In addition, the NRC may

find it appropriate to notify affected licensees to establish certain protective measures in the

absence of an HSAS declaration. The NRC could take such a step, for example, to respond to

an emergency or a site-specific situation.

The NRC is using this RIS to announce its threat advisory and protective measures system to

implement the HSAS for Category I fuel facilities. The NRC will relay information relating to the

threat conditions using the color-coded system defined by the HSAS. The NRC has also

defined protective measures in five levels, which generally correlate with the five color-coded

conditions of the HSAS. Protective measures at each level build upon the actions defined in the

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL RIS 2002-12E

Page 3 of 5

lower levels. For example, measures at level III will include those measures taken at levels I

and II.

! The level I (Low) protective measures, which generally correspond to the green

threat condition, are considered to be the routine level of operation and are

satisfied by licensees maintaining the security programs required by the

regulations, individual licenses, and Orders. Measures to enhance security need

to be available so that they can be readied or implemented in higher threat

conditions when called upon.

! The level II (Guarded) protective measures, which generally correspond to the

blue threat condition, warrant more action by the licensees, but will generally not

involve significant action beyond the routine level of operation. These actions

would typically relate to readiness, e.g., notifying personnel to standby, or

bringing in additional security officers to prepare for an enhanced response.

Actions taken at level II will include those taken at level I.

! The level III (Elevated) protective measures, which generally correspond to the

yellow threat condition, warrant enhanced security measures and additional

resources, perhaps on a sustained basis, but would be based on hardware and

personnel already at the licensees disposal. (Note: When the HSAS was first

announced on March 12, 2002, OHS also announced that the country was then

considered to be in a Yellow threat condition.) Actions taken at level III will

include those taken at levels I and II.

! The level IV (High) protective measures, which generally correspond to the

orange threat condition, assume that the licensees security organization is at its

highest sustainable level and that the licensee will request augmentation by local

and State, and possibly Federal, resources to provide additional defensive

capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available. (Note: NRC

advisories will provide additional specific information to the licensee(s) as

information about the threat develops. Any additional licensee actions will be

based upon threat specific information). Actions taken at level IV will include

those taken at levels I, II, and III.

! The level V (Severe) protective measures, which generally correspond to the red

threat condition, assume that the licensee will request augmentation by Federal

resources beyond State and local resources to provide additional defensive

capabilities to the extent such resources can be made available to enhance the

security of the facility. NRC will facilitate implementation of this added Federal

presence. (Note: It is expected that this condition will be limited to one or a very

small number of licensees for a limited period of time. Any additional specific

actions will be based on an ongoing assessment of the threat by the NRC and

other Federal agencies.) Actions taken at level V will include those taken at

levels I, II, III, and IV.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL RIS 2002-12E

Page 4 of 5

When the Attorney General of the United States makes a change in threat condition that affects

NRC licensees, the NRC will issue a threat advisory notifying its licensees of the change. The

NRC will refer licensees to the recommended protective measures outlined in the table attached

to this RIS. Regardless of the current threat condition, licensees are required to comply with

existing regulations, licenses, and Orders. The table is designed to provide a clear description

of the basic actions appropriate to achieve the desired level of protection. The NRC may tailor

the protective measures to be implemented based on the nature of the threat, including specific

instructions regarding protection against a specific mode of attack.

In some cases, the circumstances of a particular threat may warrant that additional security

measures be implemented beyond those provided in the attached table. For example, such

additional measures may be necessary depending upon the type of licensee affected, the

safeguards risks associated with various licensed activities, the specific vulnerabilities at a given

site, the suspected mode of attack, and the likelihood and nature of the threat. Although most

terrorist attacks occur without specific warning, whenever possible, the NRC will provide

information about the nature and projected time frame of the threat.

The protective measures in the attached table are assigned to particular threat levels, reflecting

the seriousness of the threat and the need for timely action to address the threat. Therefore,

prompt implementation of the measures is essential if the steps are to be effective in protecting

the facility.

The Commission may need to direct additional measures to deal with a fast-moving situation in

the transition period before a formal declaration of a threat escalation by the Attorney General.

HSPD-3 makes clear that agency heads retain the authority to respond, as necessary, to risks,

threats, incidents, or events at facilities within the specific jurisdiction of their department or

agency. In these cases, the NRC threat advisory will include additional specific guidance

beyond what is generically prescribed in the tables for a particular threat level.

NRC will update the table enclosed with this RIS as necessary to reflect changes in protective

measures for various threat levels and to reflect results from its ongoing comprehensive review

of security matters. In addition, this RIS will be reviewed at least once a year and revised as

necessary consistent with requirements to report changes to the Office of Homeland Security by

August 1 of each year. Licensees seeking to provide input to the RIS and possible revisions

should forward comments to the contact listed below.

BACKFIT DISCUSSION

RISs are generally used to communicate with the nuclear industry on a variety of matters for

which no response or action is required. This RIS communicates actions the NRC considers

appropriate at each threat level, but these actions are not requirements. A backfit analysis has

not been performed.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL RIS 2002-12E

Page 5 of 5

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION

A notice of opportunity for public comment was not published in the Federal Register because

this RIS is informational. The Commission also plans to issue additional Regulatory Issue

Summaries in this series to cover additional classes of licensees, or NRC-licensed activities, as

NRCs review progresses. Any specific comments should be forwarded to the contact listed

below.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

This RIS does not request any information collection; therefore, this RIS is not subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).

If you have any questions about this matter, please telephone or e-mail the technical contact

listed below.

R/A Daniel M. Gillen for

Robert C. Pierson, Director

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards

Contact: Andrew Rayland, NSIR/DNS

(301) 415-8102

E-mail: adr@nrc.gov

Enclosures: (1) HSPD-3, Homeland Security Advisory System

(2) Threat Conditions and Specific Actions for Category I Fuel Facilities

CONFIDENTIAL