NRC Generic Letter 1983-23: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 4 | | page count = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:July 29, 1983 TO ALL OPERATING | {{#Wiki_filter:July 29, 1983 TO ALL OPERATING REACTOR LICENSEES, APPLICANTS FOR Ali OPERATING | ||
REACTOR LICENSEES, APPLICANTS | LICENSE AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FOR COMBUSTION | ||
FOR Ali OPERATING LICENSE AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION | ENGINEERING PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS | ||
PERMITS FOR COMBUSTION | Gentlemen: | ||
ENGINEERING | SUBJECT: SAFETY EVALUATION OF "EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINES" | ||
PRESSURIZED | (GENERIC LETTER 83-23) | ||
WATER REACTORS Gentlemen: | The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed Combustion Engineering Emergency Procedure Guideline (EPG) Program as described in Combustion Engineering Owners Group (CEOG) letters of November 22, 1982 and March 29, 1983, and in the material accompanying those letters. We have concluded that the guidelines are acceptable for implementation and will provide improved guidance for emergency operating procedure development as discussed in Generic Letter 83-09. We suggest that implementation of the guidelines proceed in three steps: | ||
SUBJECT: SAFETY EVALUATION | (1) Preparation of plant specific procedures which, in general, conform to the Emergency Procedure Guidelines referenced above and implemen- tation of these procedures as required by Generic Letter 82-33, dated December 17,'1982; | ||
OF "EMERGENCY | (2) Preparation of supplements to the guidelines which cover changes, new equipment, or new knowledge and incorporation of these supplements into the procedures; and | ||
PROCEDURE | (3) Completion and improvement of the guidelines to meet our long term requirements, followed by incorporation of improvements Into plant specific procedures. | ||
GUIDELINES" (GENERIC LETTER 83-23)The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed Combustion Engineering Emergency Procedure Guideline (EPG) Program as described in Combustion Engineering Owners Group (CEOG) letters of November 22, 1982 and March 29, 1983, and in the material accompanying those letters. We have concluded that the guidelines are acceptable for implementation and will provide improved guidance for emergency operating procedure development as discussed in Generic Letter 83-09. We suggest that implementation of the guidelines proceed in three steps: (1) Preparation of plant specific procedures which, in general, conform to the Emergency Procedure Guidelines referenced above and implemen-tation of these procedures as required by Generic Letter 82-33, dated December 17,'1982;(2) Preparation of supplements to the guidelines which cover changes, new equipment, or new knowledge and incorporation of these supplements into the procedures; | |||
The prompt implementation of Step 1 will allow the benefits of the significant improvements you have achieved to be realized soon. We note however, that the guidelines are written for the procedure writers, not control room operators, and therefore preparation and implementation of procedures will require additional Human Factors input. Step 2 refers to a program for guideline or procedure updates which will be generated as a matter of routine after the implementation. | The prompt implementation of Step 1 will allow the benefits of the significant improvements you have achieved to be realized soon. We note however, that the guidelines are written for the procedure writers, not control room operators, and therefore preparation and implementation of procedures will require additional Human Factors input. Step 2 refers to a program for guideline or procedure updates which will be generated as a matter of routine after the implementation. This essentially is a main- tenance function. Step 3 refers to a program for addressing those aspects of the guidelines and procedures where additional long term work may be needed in your emergency procedure program. | ||
8 3062A.o waft* | |||
OFFICER l ........................... ................................. ......................................... ........................ ............................. ........ ................ ........................ | |||
SURNAME >l............................. ................................. ........................ ............................. ........ ................ ........................ ................ . ................. | |||
DATE t ......... ............... ......... ____................ ....... ................. ......... ................ ............... ......... .................... ........................ | |||
NRC FORM 31B (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY USGPO: 1981t335-960 | |||
- 2 - July 29, 1983 We have identified in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) a number of items associated with the guidelines which need further work by the Combustion Engineering Owners. We require that these items be addressed by either incorporating them into a future guideline revision or otherwise Justifying the disposition of the item. Additionally, because the Emergency Procedure Guidelines must be dynamic in that changes must be made to reflect changes in equipment or new knowledge, we expect the Combustion Engineering Owners' | |||
Group or a similar coalition of utilities and vendors to accept responsi- bility for continued maintenance of the guidelines. Therefore, we have requested in the enclosed letter that the Combustion Engineering Owners' | |||
Group provide a plan for addressing the SER items and by letter dated February 4, 1983, we requested a description of the program for steps 2 and 3 above. | |||
-2 -July 29, 1983 We have identified in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) a number of items associated with the guidelines which need further work by the Combustion Engineering Owners. We require that these items be addressed by either incorporating them into a future guideline revision or otherwise Justifying the disposition of the item. Additionally, because the Emergency Procedure Guidelines must be dynamic in that changes must be made to reflect changes in equipment or new knowledge, we expect the Combustion Engineering Owners'Group or a similar coalition of utilities and vendors to accept responsi-bility for continued maintenance of the guidelines. | |||
As discussed in the enclosed SER, the staff finds that the EPGs represent a significant improvement over the guidance provided in current emergency operating procedures. The approach of dividing the EPGs into a treatment of recognized "simple" conditions using Optimum Recovery Guidelines (ORGs) | |||
and coverage of all other conditions using Functional Recovery Guidelines (FRGs) meets the requirements for a symptom oriented emergency response. | |||
The guidelines provide sufficent guidance such that they can be translated into acceptable emergency operating procedures using the process identified in NUREG-0899, "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures." The staff therefore concludes that although efforts to im- prove the EPGs should continue, the EPGs identified in CEN-152 Revision 1 will provide a greater assurance of operational safety and are acceptable for implementation. | |||
Sincerely, Original signedby ,.parrell G. Eisenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Enclosures: | Sincerely, Original signedby | ||
1. Letter to Mr. ells, dated 2. SER on Guidelines Y1\x DL 5 DL:O A IR OFFICE i. ...... ...... | ,.parrell G. Eisenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Enclosures: | ||
.............. | 1. Letter to Mr. ells, dated | ||
2. SER on Guidelines Y1\x DL 5 DL:O A IR | |||
OFFICE | |||
. | SURNATE | ||
Generic Letter 83-23 185036002947 Arizona Public Service Co Nuclear Projects E E Van Brunt Jr Vice President PO Box 21666 Phoeniz AZ 85036 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co Supply A E Lundvall Jr Vice President | DATE | ||
-Supply PO Box 1475 Baltimore MD 21203 128242028120 | .. | ||
Duke Power Co Nuclear Production Dept K S Canady Manager PO Box 33189 Charlotte NC 28242 133408081117 Florida Power & Light Co Advanced Systems & Technology Robert E Uhrig Vice President PO Box 14000 Juno Beach FL 33408 104336008719 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co John B Randazza Vice President 83 Edison Drive Augusta ME 04336 106101005752 Northeast Utilities Service Co John Opeka Vice President-Nuclear Operation PO Box 270 Hartford CT 06101 | i. ...... | ||
US. A.. | |||
...... | |||
1 US Maritime Administration Ofc of Advanced Ship Operations Z Levine Mar-930 Room 4100 Washington DC 20590 | ** | ||
8 .;......... | |||
. 1... | |||
........... .............. | |||
rutoiel.. | |||
/~83 ~//3 0 | |||
. | |||
/3......... 1 64~8 | |||
_ | |||
Itx NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORDU LOFVY USGPO. 1981-35960 | |||
Generic Letter 83-23 | |||
185036002947 172203005004 Arizona Public Service Co Arkansas Power & Light Co Nuclear Projects Energy Supply E E Van Brunt Jr W Cavanaugh III | |||
Vice President Sr Vice President PO Box 21666 PO Box 551 Phoeniz AZ 85036 Little Rock AR 72203 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co 149201058220 | |||
Supply Consumers Power Co A E Lundvall Jr J W Cook Vice President - Supply Vice President PO Box 1475 1945 W Parnall Rd Baltimore MD 21203 Jackson MI 49201 | |||
128242028120 128242081033 Duke Power Co Duke Power Co Nuclear Production Dept Design Engineering K S Canady L C Dail Manager Vice President PO Box 33189 PO Box 33189 Charlotte NC 28242 Charlotte NC 28242 | |||
133408081117 170174028293 Florida Power & Light Co Louisiana Power & Light Co Advanced Systems & Technology Nuclear Operations Robert E Uhrig L V Maurin Vice President 142 Delaronde St PO Box 14000 PO Box 6008 Juno Beach FL 33408 New Orleans LA 70174 | |||
104336008719 104330004692 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co John B Randazza Elwin W Thurlow Vice President President | |||
83 Edison Drive 9 Green Street Augusta ME 04336 Augusta ME 04330 | |||
106101005752 168102022680 | |||
Northeast Utilities Service Co Omaha Public Power District John Opeka Production Operations Vice President-Nuclear Operation William C Jones PO Box 270 Division Manager Hartford CT 06101 1623 Harney Street Omaha NE 68102 | |||
191770058231 137401023241 Southern California Edison Co Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Engr & Operations Hugh G Parris R Dietch Manager | |||
2244 Walnut Grove Ave 500 A Chestnut St Tower II | |||
PO Box 800 Chattanooga TN 37401 Rosemead CA 91770 | |||
GL 83-23 Page 2 | |||
120590006830 199352008688 | |||
1 US Maritime Administration Washington Pub Power Supl Sys Ofc of Advanced Ship Operations R L Ferguson Z Levine Managing Director Mar-930 Room 4100 PO Box 968 Washington DC 20590 Richland WA 99352}} | |||
{{GL-Nav}} | {{GL-Nav}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:17, 24 November 2019
| ML031210038 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone, Calvert Cliffs, Browns Ferry, Oconee, Mcguire, Palisades, Palo Verde, Catawba, Saint Lucie, Watts Bar, Sequoyah, Arkansas Nuclear, Columbia, Turkey Point, Waterford, San Onofre, Maine Yankee, Big Rock Point, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, McGuire, 05000000, 05000307, 05000308, Washington Public Power Supply System, Satsop |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1983 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| GL-83-023, NUDOCS 8306270422 | |
| Download: ML031210038 (4) | |
July 29, 1983 TO ALL OPERATING REACTOR LICENSEES, APPLICANTS FOR Ali OPERATING
LICENSE AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FOR COMBUSTION
ENGINEERING PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: SAFETY EVALUATION OF "EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINES"
(GENERIC LETTER 83-23)
The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed Combustion Engineering Emergency Procedure Guideline (EPG) Program as described in Combustion Engineering Owners Group (CEOG) letters of November 22, 1982 and March 29, 1983, and in the material accompanying those letters. We have concluded that the guidelines are acceptable for implementation and will provide improved guidance for emergency operating procedure development as discussed in Generic Letter 83-09. We suggest that implementation of the guidelines proceed in three steps:
(1) Preparation of plant specific procedures which, in general, conform to the Emergency Procedure Guidelines referenced above and implemen- tation of these procedures as required by Generic Letter 82-33, dated December 17,'1982;
(2) Preparation of supplements to the guidelines which cover changes, new equipment, or new knowledge and incorporation of these supplements into the procedures; and
(3) Completion and improvement of the guidelines to meet our long term requirements, followed by incorporation of improvements Into plant specific procedures.
The prompt implementation of Step 1 will allow the benefits of the significant improvements you have achieved to be realized soon. We note however, that the guidelines are written for the procedure writers, not control room operators, and therefore preparation and implementation of procedures will require additional Human Factors input. Step 2 refers to a program for guideline or procedure updates which will be generated as a matter of routine after the implementation. This essentially is a main- tenance function. Step 3 refers to a program for addressing those aspects of the guidelines and procedures where additional long term work may be needed in your emergency procedure program.
8 3062A.o waft*
OFFICER l ........................... ................................. ......................................... ........................ ............................. ........ ................ ........................
SURNAME >l............................. ................................. ........................ ............................. ........ ................ ........................ ................ . .................
DATE t ......... ............... ......... ____................ ....... ................. ......... ................ ............... ......... .................... ........................
NRC FORM 31B (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY USGPO: 1981t335-960
- 2 - July 29, 1983 We have identified in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) a number of items associated with the guidelines which need further work by the Combustion Engineering Owners. We require that these items be addressed by either incorporating them into a future guideline revision or otherwise Justifying the disposition of the item. Additionally, because the Emergency Procedure Guidelines must be dynamic in that changes must be made to reflect changes in equipment or new knowledge, we expect the Combustion Engineering Owners'
Group or a similar coalition of utilities and vendors to accept responsi- bility for continued maintenance of the guidelines. Therefore, we have requested in the enclosed letter that the Combustion Engineering Owners'
Group provide a plan for addressing the SER items and by letter dated February 4, 1983, we requested a description of the program for steps 2 and 3 above.
As discussed in the enclosed SER, the staff finds that the EPGs represent a significant improvement over the guidance provided in current emergency operating procedures. The approach of dividing the EPGs into a treatment of recognized "simple" conditions using Optimum Recovery Guidelines (ORGs)
and coverage of all other conditions using Functional Recovery Guidelines (FRGs) meets the requirements for a symptom oriented emergency response.
The guidelines provide sufficent guidance such that they can be translated into acceptable emergency operating procedures using the process identified in NUREG-0899, "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures." The staff therefore concludes that although efforts to im- prove the EPGs should continue, the EPGs identified in CEN-152 Revision 1 will provide a greater assurance of operational safety and are acceptable for implementation.
Sincerely, Original signedby
,.parrell G. Eisenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Enclosures:
1. Letter to Mr. ells, dated
2. SER on Guidelines Y1\x DL 5 DL:O A IR
OFFICE
SURNATE
DATE
..
i. ......
US. A..
......
8 .;.........
. 1...
........... ..............
rutoiel..
/~83 ~//3 0
.
/3......... 1 64~8
_
Itx NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORDU LOFVY USGPO. 1981-35960
185036002947 172203005004 Arizona Public Service Co Arkansas Power & Light Co Nuclear Projects Energy Supply E E Van Brunt Jr W Cavanaugh III
Vice President Sr Vice President PO Box 21666 PO Box 551 Phoeniz AZ 85036 Little Rock AR 72203 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co 149201058220
Supply Consumers Power Co A E Lundvall Jr J W Cook Vice President - Supply Vice President PO Box 1475 1945 W Parnall Rd Baltimore MD 21203 Jackson MI 49201
128242028120 128242081033 Duke Power Co Duke Power Co Nuclear Production Dept Design Engineering K S Canady L C Dail Manager Vice President PO Box 33189 PO Box 33189 Charlotte NC 28242 Charlotte NC 28242
133408081117 170174028293 Florida Power & Light Co Louisiana Power & Light Co Advanced Systems & Technology Nuclear Operations Robert E Uhrig L V Maurin Vice President 142 Delaronde St PO Box 14000 PO Box 6008 Juno Beach FL 33408 New Orleans LA 70174
104336008719 104330004692 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co John B Randazza Elwin W Thurlow Vice President President
83 Edison Drive 9 Green Street Augusta ME 04336 Augusta ME 04330
106101005752 168102022680
Northeast Utilities Service Co Omaha Public Power District John Opeka Production Operations Vice President-Nuclear Operation William C Jones PO Box 270 Division Manager Hartford CT 06101 1623 Harney Street Omaha NE 68102
191770058231 137401023241 Southern California Edison Co Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Engr & Operations Hugh G Parris R Dietch Manager
2244 Walnut Grove Ave 500 A Chestnut St Tower II
PO Box 800 Chattanooga TN 37401 Rosemead CA 91770
GL 83-23 Page 2
120590006830 199352008688
1 US Maritime Administration Washington Pub Power Supl Sys Ofc of Advanced Ship Operations R L Ferguson Z Levine Managing Director Mar-930 Room 4100 PO Box 968 Washington DC 20590 Richland WA 99352