ML062000722: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:To:" " nrc.gov>q<EXN1@nrc.gov> | {{#Wiki_filter:To:" " nrc.gov>q<EXN1@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: 12/15/03 4:17PM | Date: 12/15/03 4:17PM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Review of transcripts Dave and Eileen, I'm proposing Monday, Dec. 22 to come to your offices to review my transcripts and answer any additional questions. | Review of transcripts Dave and Eileen, I'm proposing Monday, Dec. 22 to come to your offices to review my transcripts and answer any additional questions. | ||
Please let me know | Please let me know ifthis is suitable. I realize it will likely take most of the day. | ||
I realize it will likely take most of the day.Thank you, Kymn p.s. PSEG is attempting to haveCnd removed as Defendants. | Thank you, Kymn p.s. PSEG is attempting to haveCnd removed as Defendants. My attorney and I will be fighTmg this motion, especially given "HR" (which was cited in theN"JOWletter to me as being res onsible for my "accelerated departure") reports t 0WW (not "N" Also, technically, I was an employee of PSEG Power, not PSESNuliear. In addition, my claim of further retalitory action once I wrote:icause to keep him as a Defendant. | ||
My attorney and I will be fighTmg this motion, especially given "HR" (which was cited in theN"JOWletter to me as being res onsible for my"accelerated departure") | p.p.s. I realize just now that I don't think we ever spoke of the "work" I had planned in eafly April at Corporate Headquarters. As part of my search for eoitions in the PSEG Enterprise, I had offered my services toij. | ||
reports t 0WW (not "N" Also, technically, I was an employee of PSEG Power, not PSESNuliear. | (who used to be at Nuclear) to do some wor with him and his direct re-orts. I had had one meeting already withofft his office in Newark. Additional meetings with his managers had been scheduled 7-10 days before my departure was "accelerated." Because I was denied access to other company locations as of 3/28, these meetings had to be cancelled. Any chance of gaining a position or consulting work in the IT organization was lost. | ||
In addition, my claim of further retalitory action once I wrote:icause to keep him as a Defendant. | ., accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions .':2-II * "19-Fi}} | ||
p.p.s. I realize just now that I don't think we ever spoke of the "work" I had planned in eafly April at Corporate Headquarters. | |||
As part of my search for eoitions in the PSEG Enterprise, I had offered my services toij.(who used to be at Nuclear) to do some wor with him and his direct re-orts. I had had one meeting already withofft his office in Newark. Additional meetings with his managers had been scheduled 7-10 days before my departure was "accelerated." Because I was denied access to other company locations as of 3/28, these meetings had to be cancelled. | |||
Any chance of gaining a position or consulting work in the IT organization was lost.., accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions | |||
.':2- | |||
Revision as of 17:12, 23 November 2019
| ML062000722 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2003 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Vito D NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062000722 (1) | |
Text
To:" " nrc.gov>q<EXN1@nrc.gov>
Date: 12/15/03 4:17PM
Subject:
Review of transcripts Dave and Eileen, I'm proposing Monday, Dec. 22 to come to your offices to review my transcripts and answer any additional questions.
Please let me know ifthis is suitable. I realize it will likely take most of the day.
Thank you, Kymn p.s. PSEG is attempting to haveCnd removed as Defendants. My attorney and I will be fighTmg this motion, especially given "HR" (which was cited in theN"JOWletter to me as being res onsible for my "accelerated departure") reports t 0WW (not "N" Also, technically, I was an employee of PSEG Power, not PSESNuliear. In addition, my claim of further retalitory action once I wrote:icause to keep him as a Defendant.
p.p.s. I realize just now that I don't think we ever spoke of the "work" I had planned in eafly April at Corporate Headquarters. As part of my search for eoitions in the PSEG Enterprise, I had offered my services toij.
(who used to be at Nuclear) to do some wor with him and his direct re-orts. I had had one meeting already withofft his office in Newark. Additional meetings with his managers had been scheduled 7-10 days before my departure was "accelerated." Because I was denied access to other company locations as of 3/28, these meetings had to be cancelled. Any chance of gaining a position or consulting work in the IT organization was lost.
., accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions .':2-II * "19-Fi