ML17256A664: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:I | {{#Wiki_filter:I | ||
FORMATION DISTRIBUTION | ~~s '4 FORMATION DISTRIBUTION EM,(RIDS) | ||
NO DOCKET FACIL:50 | REGULATOR) S | ||
~Operating Reactors Branch 5 | 'ACCESSION NBR:8305060271 DOC DATE: 83/04/28 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50 BYNAME244 Robert Emme,t | ||
~ | |||
Ginna Nuclear Plant~ Unfit ii Rochester G 05000244 | |||
'AUTH AUTHOR AFFILIATION MAIERg J,E ~ Rochester Gas 8 Electric | |||
~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Corp'ECIP CRUTCHFIELDgD ~ Operating Reactors Branch 5 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Forwards,"Containment Vessel Evaluation of Dome Liner L Studsi" re SEP,Topic III-"7'~"load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis)~," DISTRIBUTION CODEt A035S,COPIES RECEIVED:LTR"ENCL SIZE+..'baE | Forwards,"Containment Vessel Evaluation of Dome Liner L Studsi" re SEP,Topic III-"7'~ "load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis) ~ ," | ||
%%@IS. | |||
SEP Topic NOTES;NRR/DI./SEP 1cy, 05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR ORB5 BC 01 INTERNAL: NRR/DL/ORAB 11 | DISTRIBUTION CODEt A035S,COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ( "ENCL ( SIZE+..'baE | ||
~I r v L~ | /~Q / | ||
~~ | TITlE: OR Submittal: SEP Topic NOTES;NRR/DI./SEP 1cy, 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI- ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL NRR ORB5 BC 01 3 3 INTERNAL: NRR/DL/ORAB 11 1 1 NRR/DL/SEPB 12 3 -3 1 1 NRR/DS I/CSB 07 1 1 EG FJ 04 1 1 RGN1 1 EXTERNAL: ACRS 14 e LPDR 03 1 1 NRC PDR 02 1 1 NTIS 5 1 1 NOTES: 1 1 (TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 21 ENCl 21 | ||
/ | |||
/IIIIIII//I//'IIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS | ~I r | ||
~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.14649 1 TEI.EPHOHE AREA coDE Tle 546.2700 April 28, 1983 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: | v L ~ | ||
Mr.Dennis M.Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.5 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 | |||
~ ~ cr IIIIIIIIIIII/ /IIIIIIIIIII | |||
/tI AHD I/Illlj/ggl!I IIII!I!IIIIII | |||
/ IIIIIII//I//'IIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 1 | |||
VOHt4 8< MAILER TEI.EPHOHE Vice Preeident AREA coDE Tle 546.2700 April 28, 1983 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
SEP Topic III-7.B, Load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis)R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket 50-244 | SEP Topic III-7.B, Load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis) | ||
R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket 50-244 | |||
==Dear Mr. Crutchfield:== | |||
Enclosed is a report "Containment Vessel Evaluation of Dome Liner and Studs" prepared by Gilbert/Commonwealth for Rochester Gas and Electric. The purpose of the report is to describe the analysis performed to evaluate the post-accident behavior of the containment liner and studs. The conclusion reached in the report is that failure of some studs in certain areas of the liner, although not expected, is possible. However, it is determined that this condition would not cause tearing of the liner, and thus would not prevent the liner from maintaining its post-accident leak-tight integrity. | |||
As a point of clarification, it should be noted that the accident pressure and temperature profiles used in NUREG/CR-2580 (the SMA/LLL liner analysis) are for the steam line break condition, rather than a LOCA, as implied. This is obvious from the LLL analysis presented in Appendix A to the Safety Evaluation Report for SEP Topics VI-2.D and VI-3, Mass and Energy Release for Pipe Breaks Inside Containment", November 3, 1981. Nonetheless, as shown by the attached analysis, the liner integrity will be maintained for all accident situations. | |||
Very truly yours, J n E. Maier C | |||
83050b027i 830428 j PDR ADOCK 05000244 | |||
! P PDR | |||
A 'I | |||
~ ~ | |||
I r | |||
1 | |||
'N, rr | |||
'f h | |||
~' | |||
1 I | |||
r I}} | |||
Revision as of 18:35, 29 October 2019
| ML17256A664 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1983 |
| From: | Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17256A666 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-03-07.B, TASK-3-7.B, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8305060271 | |
| Download: ML17256A664 (4) | |
Text
I
~~s '4 FORMATION DISTRIBUTION EM,(RIDS)
REGULATOR) S
'ACCESSION NBR:8305060271 DOC DATE: 83/04/28 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50 BYNAME244 Robert Emme,t
~
Ginna Nuclear Plant~ Unfit ii Rochester G 05000244
'AUTH AUTHOR AFFILIATION MAIERg J,E ~ Rochester Gas 8 Electric
~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Corp'ECIP CRUTCHFIELDgD ~ Operating Reactors Branch 5
SUBJECT:
Forwards,"Containment Vessel Evaluation of Dome Liner L Studsi" re SEP,Topic III-"7'~ "load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis) ~ ,"
%%@IS.
DISTRIBUTION CODEt A035S,COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ( "ENCL ( SIZE+..'baE
/~Q /
TITlE: OR Submittal: SEP Topic NOTES;NRR/DI./SEP 1cy, 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCI- ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL NRR ORB5 BC 01 3 3 INTERNAL: NRR/DL/ORAB 11 1 1 NRR/DL/SEPB 12 3 -3 1 1 NRR/DS I/CSB 07 1 1 EG FJ 04 1 1 RGN1 1 EXTERNAL: ACRS 14 e LPDR 03 1 1 NRC PDR 02 1 1 NTIS 5 1 1 NOTES: 1 1 (TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 21 ENCl 21
~I r
v L ~
~ ~ cr IIIIIIIIIIII/ /IIIIIIIIIII
/tI AHD I/Illlj/ggl!I IIII!I!IIIIII
/ IIIIIII//I//'IIIIIIIIIII ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 1
VOHt4 8< MAILER TEI.EPHOHE Vice Preeident AREA coDE Tle 546.2700 April 28, 1983 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
SEP Topic III-7.B, Load Combinations (Containment Liner Analysis)
R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket 50-244
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
Enclosed is a report "Containment Vessel Evaluation of Dome Liner and Studs" prepared by Gilbert/Commonwealth for Rochester Gas and Electric. The purpose of the report is to describe the analysis performed to evaluate the post-accident behavior of the containment liner and studs. The conclusion reached in the report is that failure of some studs in certain areas of the liner, although not expected, is possible. However, it is determined that this condition would not cause tearing of the liner, and thus would not prevent the liner from maintaining its post-accident leak-tight integrity.
As a point of clarification, it should be noted that the accident pressure and temperature profiles used in NUREG/CR-2580 (the SMA/LLL liner analysis) are for the steam line break condition, rather than a LOCA, as implied. This is obvious from the LLL analysis presented in Appendix A to the Safety Evaluation Report for SEP Topics VI-2.D and VI-3, Mass and Energy Release for Pipe Breaks Inside Containment", November 3, 1981. Nonetheless, as shown by the attached analysis, the liner integrity will be maintained for all accident situations.
Very truly yours, J n E. Maier C
83050b027i 830428 j PDR ADOCK 05000244
! P PDR
A 'I
~ ~
I r
1
'N, rr
'f h
~'
1 I
r I