ML18051B423: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.:..*._ .. consumers | {{#Wiki_filter:.:..*._ .. consumers Power company General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES PLANT -David J VandeWalle Director of Nuclear licensing CLARIFICATION OF SUBCOOLING MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) letter dated December 14, 1983 provided _Consumers Power Company an evaluation of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation". | ||
Power company General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation | This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently installed subcooling margin_monitor is acceptable contingent on upgrading of the input range from the pressure and temperature sensors as committed by the licensee". | ||
US Nuclear Regulatory | Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector as documented in Inspection Report 50-255/85005, a clarification of the operabiiity requirements for the subcooling margin monitor is necessary. | ||
Commission | Our Technical Specifications require that at least one channel of the subcooling margin be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature is above 515°F. In addition to a continuous digital display, the subcooling margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to of the two otherwise independent channels. | ||
Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES | The alarm function of this monitor-is not addressed in our Technical Specifications, but we do calibrate the alarm during the performance of the Technical Specification surveillance procedure for the subcooling margin monitor. ' "Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate Core Cooling)". | ||
PLANT -David J VandeWalle | It is our understanding that this requirement is referencing the composite instrumentation system for detection of inadequate core cooling. This system consists of a primary coolant inventory monitoring system, core-exit thermocouples and subcooling margin monitor. Although the alarm function is 'incorporated in our subcooling margin monitor design and certainly does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate core cooling, as does the coolant inventory monitoring system. In addition, there is no specific requirement for an alarm function for the subcooling OC0685-0003B-NL02 I ADOCK ) | ||
Director of Nuclear licensing | . " Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Palisades Plant Subcooling Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2 margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification Criteria for Accident Monitoring Instrumentation". | ||
CLARIFICATION | For operability declarations as well as subsequent reportability determinations, we believe it is appropriate to take credit for the operable display. Consequently, the inoperability of the alarm function of the subcooling margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute inoperability of the subcooling margin monitor provided that the subcooling margin monitor detection and display capabilities are unaffected. | ||
OF SUBCOOLING | The alarm function should, however, be prudently maintained in an operable condition. | ||
MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY | Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector | ||
REQUIREMENTS | -Palisades OC0685-0003B-NL02}} | ||
Nuclear Regulatory | |||
Commission (NRC) letter dated December 14, 1983 provided _Consumers | |||
Power Company an evaluation | |||
of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate | |||
Core Cooling Instrumentation". | |||
This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently | |||
installed | |||
subcooling | |||
margin_monitor | |||
is acceptable | |||
contingent | |||
on upgrading | |||
of the input range from the pressure and temperature | |||
sensors as committed | |||
by the licensee". | |||
Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector | |||
as documented | |||
in Inspection | |||
Report 50-255/85005, a clarification | |||
of the operabiiity | |||
requirements | |||
for the subcooling | |||
margin monitor is necessary. | |||
Our Technical | |||
Specifications | |||
require that at least one channel of the subcooling | |||
margin | |||
be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature | |||
is above 515°F. In addition to a continuous | |||
digital display, the subcooling | |||
margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to | |||
of the two otherwise | |||
independent | |||
channels. | |||
The alarm function of this monitor-is | |||
not addressed | |||
in our Technical | |||
Specifications, but we do calibrate | |||
the alarm during the performance | |||
of the Technical | |||
Specification | |||
surveillance | |||
procedure | |||
for the subcooling | |||
margin monitor. ' "Clarification | |||
of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation | |||
for Detection | |||
of Inadequate | |||
Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication | |||
must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate | |||
Core Cooling)". | |||
It is our understanding | |||
that this requirement | |||
is referencing | |||
the composite | |||
instrumentation | |||
system for detection | |||
of inadequate | |||
core cooling. This system consists of a primary coolant inventory | |||
monitoring | |||
system, core-exit | |||
thermocouples | |||
and subcooling | |||
margin monitor. Although the alarm function is 'incorporated | |||
in our subcooling | |||
margin monitor design and certainly | |||
does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling | |||
margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate | |||
core cooling, as does the coolant inventory | |||
monitoring | |||
system. In addition, there is no specific requirement | |||
for an alarm function for the subcooling | |||
OC0685-0003B-NL02 I ADOCK ) | |||
. " Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Palisades | |||
Plant Subcooling | |||
Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2 margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification | |||
Criteria for Accident Monitoring | |||
Instrumentation". | |||
For operability | |||
declarations | |||
as well as subsequent | |||
reportability | |||
determinations, we believe it is appropriate | |||
to take credit for the operable display. Consequently, the inoperability | |||
of the alarm function of the subcooling | |||
margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute | |||
inoperability | |||
of the subcooling | |||
margin monitor provided that the subcooling | |||
margin monitor detection | |||
and display capabilities | |||
are unaffected. | |||
The alarm function should, however, be prudently | |||
maintained | |||
in an operable condition. | |||
Director, Nuclear Licensing | |||
CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector | |||
-Palisades | |||
OC0685-0003B-NL02 | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 00:20, 17 August 2019
| ML18051B423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1985 |
| From: | Vandewalle D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.F.2, TASK-TM GL-82-28, NUDOCS 8506170442 | |
| Download: ML18051B423 (2) | |
Text
.:..*._ .. consumers Power company General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 10, 1985 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES PLANT -David J VandeWalle Director of Nuclear licensing CLARIFICATION OF SUBCOOLING MARGIN MONITOR OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) letter dated December 14, 1983 provided _Consumers Power Company an evaluation of our response to Generic Letter 82-28, "Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation".
This NRC letter stated "the design of the presently installed subcooling margin_monitor is acceptable contingent on upgrading of the input range from the pressure and temperature sensors as committed by the licensee".
Due to recent concerns of our Senior Resident Inspector as documented in Inspection Report 50-255/85005, a clarification of the operabiiity requirements for the subcooling margin monitor is necessary.
Our Technical Specifications require that at least one channel of the subcooling margin be operable whenever primary coolant system temperature is above 515°F. In addition to a continuous digital display, the subcooling margin monitor also includes an alarm function which is -common _to of the two otherwise independent channels.
The alarm function of this monitor-is not addressed in our Technical Specifications, but we do calibrate the alarm during the performance of the Technical Specification surveillance procedure for the subcooling margin monitor. ' "Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements", NUREG-0737, section II.F.2; Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling, item 5, requires that "the indication must give advanced warning of the approach of ICC (Inadequate Core Cooling)".
It is our understanding that this requirement is referencing the composite instrumentation system for detection of inadequate core cooling. This system consists of a primary coolant inventory monitoring system, core-exit thermocouples and subcooling margin monitor. Although the alarm function is 'incorporated in our subcooling margin monitor design and certainly does provide advanced warning, an operable subcooling margin monitor display, itself, also provides advanced warning of the approach of inadequate core cooling, as does the coolant inventory monitoring system. In addition, there is no specific requirement for an alarm function for the subcooling OC0685-0003B-NL02 I ADOCK )
. " Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Palisades Plant Subcooling Margin Monitor June 10, 1985 2 margin monitor in Appendix B of NUREG-0737, "Design and Qualification Criteria for Accident Monitoring Instrumentation".
For operability declarations as well as subsequent reportability determinations, we believe it is appropriate to take credit for the operable display. Consequently, the inoperability of the alarm function of the subcooling margin monitor, for whatever reason, does not constitute inoperability of the subcooling margin monitor provided that the subcooling margin monitor detection and display capabilities are unaffected.
The alarm function should, however, be prudently maintained in an operable condition.
Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector
-Palisades OC0685-0003B-NL02