IR 05000201/1990001: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1     U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012)
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:   2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE ft*tv Zdj {, vwf-v-t.w+t; ( 0"f' Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i 03 @.uH.pvrl- (l u'-J   2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 6:'l !AJ cJqjtiC tl r (601y   Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER($) 2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)   4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)   5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-32650    24-26380-01 I
ft*tv Z dj {, vwf-v-t.w+t; ( 0"f' i 03 @.uH.pvrl-(l u'-J 6:'l !AJ cJqjtiC tl r (601y REPORT NUMBER($)
LICENSEE:
2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
030-32650 LICENSEE:
ljL Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identifie D Previous violation(s) close D The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfie Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)
-----
5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 24-26380-01 I The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspecto The inspection findings are as follows: ljL 1. D 2. D 3. D 4. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identifie Previous violation(s)
D During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance with 10 CFR 19. 1 (Violations and Corrective Actions)
closed. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfie Non-cited violation(s)
Statement of Corrective Actions I hereby state that. within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requeste TITLE  PRINTED NAME  SIGNATURE  DATE LICENSEE'S REPRESENTATIVE      A NRC INSPECTOR Kevin G. Null BRANCH CHIEF {\_
were discussed involving the following requirement(s):  
  \I ~Ml)~-.- \ *
-----During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance with 10 CFR 19. 11. (Violations and Corrective Actions) Statement of Corrective Actions I hereby state that. within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identifie This statement of corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, date when full compliance will be achieved).
    \.,\ c.. I"_
J . . ' - '-.ilA~
          ,
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)


I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requeste TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE LICENSEE'S REPRESENTATIVE NRC INSPECTOR Kevin G. Null BRANCH CHIEF {\_ -.-\.,\ c.. I"_ \I ~Ml)~ \ * J ... ' -'-.ilA~ NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)
NRC FORM 591 M PART 3     U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION (07-2012)
A ,
10 CFR 2.201   Docket File Information SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:   2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE Herzog Contracting Corporation   Region III 103 Roseport Road   U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Elwood, KS 66024   2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)   4. LICENSE NUMBER{S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-32650  24-26380-01  April 18, 2019 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED  7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS 87124    All SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER 3121  5  Gregory Cayer, RSO   (816) 901-4958
NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 (07-2012)
[{] Main Office Inspection  Next Inspection Date: 04/18/2024 D Field Office Inspection D Temporary Job Site Inspection PROGRAM SCOPE This was a routine, unannounced inspection of a licensee that was authorized to possess and use portable gauges for measuring physical properties of materials. At the time of the inspection, the licensee possessed two troxler model 3400 series gauges. The licensee had three employees, including the radiation safety officer (RSO), who had been trained by the manufacturer to use the devices. The gauges were used at temporary job sites where NRC maintains jurisdiction, namely Missouri. The licensee also possessed a State of Kansas license that authorized the storage and use of portable gauges in Kansa PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS The inspector interviewed the RSO and a trained portable gauge user. The RSO demonstrated how the devices were secured when not in use or under constant surveillance while in NRC jurisdiction. The trained user demonstrated how a gauge would be transported when taken to a temporary job site, and provided examples of the shipping/transportation documentation and emergency procedures that accompanied each gauge when transported to a job site. Gauges were always returned to the main office in Kansas for storage and never stored at temporary job sites. The licensee only performed routine maintenance/cleaning of the gauges. Servicing of the gauges that involved removal of the source rod was performed by the gauge manufacturer. The licensee possessed two survey meters that were calibrated on an annual basis. Authorized users were issued personal dosimetry, which was exchanged quarterl The inspector reviewed records of training (including HAZMAT certificates), personal dosimetry, gauge use log records, results of sealed source leak tests and physical inventory, transportation binders that accompanied each gauge to a job site, and survey meter calibration record No violations of NRC requirements were identified.
10 CFR 2.201 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION Docket File Information SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:
 
Herzog Contracting Corporation 103 Roseport Road Elwood, KS 66024 REPORT NUMBER(S)
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)
2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)
030-32650 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 87124 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE 4. LICENSE NUMBER{S)
24-26380-01 Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION April 18, 2019 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS All SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 3121 2. PRIORITY 5 [{] Main Office Inspection D Field Office Inspection D Temporary Job Site Inspection 3. LICENSEE CONTACT Gregory Cayer, RSO Next Inspection Date: PROGRAM SCOPE 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER (816) 901-4958 04/18/2024 This was a routine, unannounced inspection of a licensee that was authorized to possess and use portable gauges for measuring physical properties of material At the time of the inspection, the licensee possessed two troxler model 3400 series gauges. The licensee had three employees, including the radiation safety officer (RSO), who had been trained by the manufacturer to use the devices. The gauges were used at temporary job sites where NRC maintains jurisdiction, namely Missour The licensee also possessed a State of Kansas license that authorized the storage and use of portable gauges in Kansas. PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS The inspector interviewed the RSO and a trained portable gauge user. The RSO demonstrated how the devices were secured when not in use or under constant surveillance while in NRC jurisdictio The trained user demonstrated how a gauge would be transported when taken to a temporary job site, and provided examples of the shipping/transportation documentation and emergency procedures that accompanied each gauge when transported to a job site. Gauges were always returned to the main office in Kansas for storage and never stored at temporary job sites. The licensee only performed routine maintenance/cleaning of the gauges. Servicing of the gauges that involved removal of the source rod was performed by the gauge manufacture The licensee possessed two survey meters that were calibrated on an annual basis. Authorized users were issued personal dosimetry, which was exchanged quarterl The inspector reviewed records of training (including HAZMAT certificates), personal dosimetry, gauge use log records, results of sealed source leak tests and physical inventory, transportation binders that accompanied each gauge to a job site, and survey meter calibration records. No violations of NRC requirements were identifie NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)
}}
}}

Revision as of 20:42, 19 October 2019

Herzog Contracting Corp. - NRC Form 591M Parts 1 & 3, Inspection Report 03032650/2019001(DNMS)
ML19121A177
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project, 03038850
Issue date: 04/18/2019
From: Kevin Null
NRC/RGN-III
To: Cayer G
Herzog Contracting Corp
References
IR 2019001
Download: ML19121A177 (2)


Text

NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012)

1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE ft*tv Zdj {, vwf-v-t.w+t; ( 0"f' Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i 03 @.uH.pvrl- (l u'-J 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 6:'l !AJ cJqjtiC tl r (601y Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER($) 2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-32650 24-26380-01 I

LICENSEE:

The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:

ljL Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identifie D Previous violation(s) close D The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfie Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):


D During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance with 10 CFR 19. 1 (Violations and Corrective Actions)

Statement of Corrective Actions I hereby state that. within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requeste TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE LICENSEE'S REPRESENTATIVE A NRC INSPECTOR Kevin G. Null BRANCH CHIEF {\_

\I ~Ml)~-.- \ *

\.,\ c.. I"_

J . . ' - '-.ilA~

,

NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)

NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION (07-2012)

10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE Herzog Contracting Corporation Region III 103 Roseport Road U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Elwood, KS 66024 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019-001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER{S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION 030-32650 24-26380-01 April 18, 2019 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS 87124 All SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER 3121 5 Gregory Cayer, RSO (816) 901-4958

[{] Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: 04/18/2024 D Field Office Inspection D Temporary Job Site Inspection PROGRAM SCOPE This was a routine, unannounced inspection of a licensee that was authorized to possess and use portable gauges for measuring physical properties of materials. At the time of the inspection, the licensee possessed two troxler model 3400 series gauges. The licensee had three employees, including the radiation safety officer (RSO), who had been trained by the manufacturer to use the devices. The gauges were used at temporary job sites where NRC maintains jurisdiction, namely Missouri. The licensee also possessed a State of Kansas license that authorized the storage and use of portable gauges in Kansa PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS The inspector interviewed the RSO and a trained portable gauge user. The RSO demonstrated how the devices were secured when not in use or under constant surveillance while in NRC jurisdiction. The trained user demonstrated how a gauge would be transported when taken to a temporary job site, and provided examples of the shipping/transportation documentation and emergency procedures that accompanied each gauge when transported to a job site. Gauges were always returned to the main office in Kansas for storage and never stored at temporary job sites. The licensee only performed routine maintenance/cleaning of the gauges. Servicing of the gauges that involved removal of the source rod was performed by the gauge manufacturer. The licensee possessed two survey meters that were calibrated on an annual basis. Authorized users were issued personal dosimetry, which was exchanged quarterl The inspector reviewed records of training (including HAZMAT certificates), personal dosimetry, gauge use log records, results of sealed source leak tests and physical inventory, transportation binders that accompanied each gauge to a job site, and survey meter calibration record No violations of NRC requirements were identified.

NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)